throbber
Jpn. J. Cancer Res. (Gann), 78, 193-201; February, 1987
`
`The Inhibition of Neoplastic Cell Proliferation with Human Natural Tumor Necrosis
`Factor
`
`Masahiro NoBUHARA, * 1 Toshinori KANAMORt, * 1 Yoshikazu AsHIDA, • 1 Hiromi OotNO, • 1
`Yoshifumi HoRISAWA, *1 Kazuyuki NAKAYAMA,*' Tetsuya AsAMI, • 1 Munehiro lKETANI, *'
`Kouichi NooA, *' Syunsaku AN00H* 2 and Masashi KuR1MoT0* 2
`.,Research Laboratories for Cell Science, Machida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 1-1, Kamiya 1-chome, Kita-ku,
`Tokyo J15 and * 1Fujisaki Institute, Hayashibara Biological Laboratories, Inc., 675-1, Fujisaki, Okayama 702
`
`Purified human natural tumor necrosis factor (n-TNF) was prepared by stimulating human
`leukemic B cell line (BALL- I ) with Sendai virus. The colony formations of all of 18 human
`cancer-derived abnormal cell lines were suppressed by 10'- 106 U/ml of n-TNF, while n-TNF was
`nontoxic to all human normal fibroblast cells. This i11 vitro inhibition of cell growth was reversible.
`In breast adenocarcinoma MCF7 cells treated with n-TNF a specific decrease of DNA synthesis
`was observed, and DNA histograms showed a block at G, in the cell cycle. In vivo studies revealed
`that n-TNF suppressed the tumor growth of murine Meth A sarcoma, human renal adeno(cid:173)
`carcinoma (ACHN), malignant melanoma (SK-MEL- 28) and glioblastoma (U- 373 MG).
`Isobologram analysis showed that n-TNF synergistically inhibited cell growth in combination with
`human natural interferon (IFN)-a. 111 vivo synergism of n-TNF and IFN-a was also found in the
`U-373MG tumor model implanted into nude mice.
`
`Key words: Tumor necrosis factor -
`
`Interferon - Synergism
`
`Human cells produce many kinds of cyto(cid:173)
`kines in response to many types of stimuli
`such as endotoxin, virus, bacteria and so on.
`Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) was found as a
`kind of cytokine which showed in vitro L cell
`in vivo hemorrhagic
`killing activity and
`necrotic activity on murine Meth A sarcoma
`implanted into mice. 'l It was originally thought
`that TNF was secreted from monocyte/
`• J> However,
`macrophage cell population. 2
`> recently found that a hemato(cid:173)
`Rubin et a/. 4
`poietic-derived Luk II cell line secreted TNF
`tumor promoter,
`on stimulation with a
`mezerein. T hey purified two types of human
`natural TNFs with molecular weights of
`70,000 daltons and 19,000-25,000 daltons by
`SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS(cid:173)
`PAGE) under reducing conditions. The amino
`acid sequence and cDNA sequence of both
`rabbit TNF from macrophage-like cells 1
`> and
`human TNF from monocyte-like cells6l have
`recently been determined.
`We have found that a human leukemic B
`> secreted human nat(cid:173)
`cell (BALL-1 cell) line1
`ural TNF (n-TNF) into the culture fluid to(cid:173)
`gether with human natural interferon ( IFN)(cid:173)
`a on stimulation with Sendai virus. The
`
`78(2)
`
`1987
`
`crude n-TNF in the culture fluid was purified
`to homogeneity on SOS-PAGE in order to
`determine the profiles of the in vitro anti(cid:173)
`proliferative and in vivo antitumor activities.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`Cell Lines MCF7'> was supplied by Dr. M. Namba
`(Kawasaki Med. Sch.), MKN-1'1 and MKN-28' 1
`were from Dr. T. Motoyama (Niigata Univ. Sch.
`Med.), HEC-1C1°1 was from Dr. T . Kuwata (Chiba
`Univ.), KP! 111 was from Dr. K. Tanaka (Kyushu
`Univ.), SEKI-F 12> was from Dr. M. Sekiguchi
`(Inst. Med. Sci., Univ. Tokyo), Sk-MEL-28"> was
`from Dr. F. Takaku (Tokyo Univ.), U-373MG">
`was from Otsuka Pharm. Co., Ltd ., and HF8209 1»
`and HF821 I were from Dr. J. lmanishi (Kyoto
`Pref. Univ. Med.). M08 was established by the
`authors. A549,'6> A-498,"> BT-20,"> SK-LU-J, 11>
`HT-144,"> SK-CO-I,''> HeLa, 1•> ACHN, 20> U-138
`MG 1'> and KB 21> were supplied by the American
`Type Culture Collection. BALL- I cells, which was
`used for n-TNF production, were established from
`a patient with acute lymphoblastic leukemia by
`> in 1976. BALL-I cells were nega(cid:173)
`Miyoshi et al. 1
`tive for EBNA, virtually 100% surface lg-positive
`and human thymus-related antigen-negative.
`Culture Media, Animals and Reagents MEM,
`methionine-free MEM, Ham's F -12 and RPMI
`
`193
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2089
`Breckenridge v. Novartis, IPR 2017-01592
`Page 1 of 9
`
`

`

`1640 were purchased from Nissui Seiyaku Co.,
`(D(cid:173)
`Ltd., Japan. Dulbecco's modified MEM
`MEM) was purchased from Life Technologies,
`Inc., USA. L-15 medium and non-essential amino
`acid mixture were purchased from Flow Labo(cid:173)
`ratories, Inc., USA. All sera were obtained from
`Irvine Scientific, USA, through Nippon Bio-Supply
`Center, Japan. The 15.5 mm</> well dishes, 35 mm</>
`Petri dishes and 96-microwell plates were pur(cid:173)
`chased from A/S Nunc, Denmark and 60 mm</>
`Petri dishes from Corning Glass Works, USA.
`Mitomycin C (MMC), fluorouracil (5-FU) and
`doxorubicin hydrochloride (DXR) were purchased
`from Kyowa Hakka Kogyo Co., Ltd., Japan, and
`nimustine hydrochloride (ACNU) was purchased
`from Sankyo Co., Ltd., Japan. [3H]Thymidine,
`3H]uridine, [31S]methionine and Bolton-Hunter
`[
`reagent for protein iodination (uil) were supplied
`by Amersham International plc. UK. RNase and
`iodide were purchased from Sigma
`propidium
`Chemical Co., USA, and pronase P was obtained
`from Kaken Pharmaceutical Co., Japan. CBF1
`mice and BALB/c nu/nu mice were purchased
`from Shizuoka Laboratory Center, Japan and
`Nippon Clea, Japan, respectively.
`The purified human natural IFN-a was prepared
`from the culture fluid of BALL- I cells stimulated
`with Sendai virus by the authors as described by
`Imanishi et al.m and Tanimoto.n> Sendai virus was
`also prepared by the authors. 2•>
`Sepharose gel coupled with murine anti-IFN-a
`monoclonal antibody (NK-2 Sepharose gel ) was
`purchased from Celltech Ltd., UK. An ultra(cid:173)
`filtration membrane (AIP-3013, MW 6000-cut)
`was purchased from Asahi Chemical Industry Co.,
`Ltd., Japan. Phenyl-Sepharose gel and Sephadex
`G-200 gel were obtained from Pharmacia, Sweden.
`Murine anti-n-TNF monoclonal antibody (3D6
`antibody) was prepared by the authors (unpub(cid:173)
`lished).
`n-TNF Preparations BALL-I cells suspended in
`RPMI 1640 (5 X 106 cells/ml) were stimulated
`overnight with about 100 HAU/ml of Sendai virus
`at 35°. The cells were discarded by centrifugation
`and the supernatant was concentrated by using an
`ultrafiltration membrane (AIP-3013). The concen(cid:173)
`trated solution containing n-TNF was applied to a
`phenyl-Sepharose column. n-TNF was then eluted
`in O.OlM sodium
`with 60% ethylene glycol
`phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), followed by dial(cid:173)
`ysis against PBS. The partially purified n-TNF
`solution was passed through an NK-2 Sepharose
`gel column to remove IFN-a. n-TNF was purified
`to homogeneity by affinity chromatography on a
`3D6 antibody coupled-Sepharose gel column by
`eluting with 0.035M ethylamine, followed by gel
`filtration on a Sephadex G-200 column with X 2
`PBS (maned fraction No. H-7-1). The purified
`
`M. NOBUHARA, ET AL.
`n-TNF showed a single homogeneous band with a
`molecular weight of 17,000 to 18,000 daltons on
`SOS-PAGE by the method of Laemli.m Protein
`sequencing and cDNA sequencing of n-TNF26
`> in(cid:173)
`dicated it to be almost identical with human TNF
`secreted from a premyelocytic leukemic cell (HL-
`60) line. 6> All in vitro and in vivo experiments in this
`study were carried out by using purified n-TNF
`preparations with a specific activity of about 109 U/
`mg protein.
`Titration of n-TNF was carried out by measur(cid:173)
`ing the cytopathic effeci (CPE) against murine Ln,
`in MEM sup(cid:173)
`cells, which were subcultured
`plemented with 10% bovine serum in a 96-micro(cid:173)
`well plate ( 1 x 10• cells/well). Actinomycin D ( 1.6
`µg/ml final concentration) and n-TNF were
`simultaneously added to all microwells and the
`plate was incubated overnight at 37°. The final
`concentration of n-TNF giving half CPE was arbi(cid:173)
`trarily defined as SO Laboratory units/ml. A Japan
`Standard Reference for TNF was recently supplied
`by Dr. S. Yamazaki, NIH, Japan, and 1 JRU was
`equivalent to 350 Laboratory units.
`In vitro Cell Proliferation Inhibition Table I shows
`the compositions of media employed for in vitro
`colony formation. One hundred to three thousand
`cells of each cell line were inoculated in 35 mm</> or
`60 mm</> Petri dishes and cultured at 37° under~%
`CO,/95% air for 7- 13 days either in the presence
`or absence of n-TNF, followed by Giemsa stain(cid:173)
`ing.m The number of colonies consisting of more
`than 20 cells was counted in order to calculate the
`n-TNF concentration which decreased colony for(cid:173)
`mation by 50% (IC!O) ,
`In order to clarify whether or not the anti(cid:173)
`proliferative activity of n-TNF was reversible,
`MCF7 cells were cultured by the mass culture
`method in the presence of 104-10' U/ml of n-TNF
`for 2 days, then culture was continued in fresh
`medium without n-TNF for another 7 days.
`Isobologram analysis of the combination of
`n-TNF with human IFN-a or chemotherapeutics
`such as MMC, 5-FU, DXR and ACNU was
`performed as described by Steel and Peckham. 21> In
`the case of HEC-1 C cells, which are totally resis(cid:173)
`tant to human IFN-a, the combination effect of
`n-TNF (0 or 350 U/ml) and IFN-a (0, 101, or 104
`IU/ml) was analyzed in triplicate at each concen(cid:173)
`tration by the method of Dannecker et a/,2'l
`The effects of n-TNF on DNA, RNA and pro(cid:173)
`tein syntheses were also investigated by using MCF
`7 cells cultured in the presence of 106 U/ml of
`n-TNF for 24 hr according to the method of Fuse
`and Kuwata, 30> The DNA histogram ofMCF7 cells
`treated with 106 U/ml of n-TNF was analyzed for
`36 hr in a fluorescence-activated ceU sorter (FACS
`IV, Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems,
`USA) by the method of Crissman et al. 31> n-TNF
`
`194
`
`Jpn. J. Cancer Res. (Gann)
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2089
`Breckenridge v. Novartis, IPR 2017-01592
`Page 2 of 9
`
`

`

`protein was iodinated by the method of Littman et
`a/.">
`In vivo Antitumor Animal Experiments The in vivo
`experiments were carried out with murine Meth A
`sarcoma intradermally (id) implanted into CBF,
`(U-373MG),
`and human glioblastoma
`mice,
`human renal adenocarcinoma (ACHN) and human
`malignant melanoma (SK-MEL-28) which were
`subcutaneously (sc) implanted into BALB/c nu/
`nu mice. The n-TNF was intravenously (iv) or
`intratumorally (itu) administered either alone or in
`combination with human natural IFN-a.
`
`HUMAN NATURAL TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR
`the in vitro inhibition spectra against the 18
`abnormal cell lines did not show any spe(cid:173)
`cificity regarding the origin of the tumors
`from which the cell lines had been established.
`MCF7 cells, which were most sensitive to
`n-TNF in vitro, were employed in order to
`clarify how n-TNF would affect the intra(cid:173)
`cellular macromolecule synthesis. Figure 1 in(cid:173)
`dicates that over a 24 hr period, 106 U/ml of
`n-TNF specifically suppressed DNA synthesis
`and brought about very little decrease of
`RNA and protein syntheses. As shown in Fig.
`2, the DNA histogram analysis revealed that
`control (untreated) MCF7 cells constantly
`divided during 36 hr under these experimental
`conditions. On the other hand, a major por(cid:173)
`tion of S-, G2- and M-phase cells had dis(cid:173)
`appeared almost completely after a 24 hr
`
`RESULTS
`In vitro Experiments As shown in Table I, the
`colony formation of all of 18 human cancer(cid:173)
`derived abnormal cell lines was inhibited by
`n-TNF but that of three normal fibroblasts
`was not suppressed. The results also show that
`
`Table I.
`
`Cell line
`
`In vitro Antiproliferative Activity of n-TNF against Twenty-one Human Cell Lines
`re,.
`Culture
`media''
`(U/ml)
`
`Origin
`
`A. Extremely sensitive group
`Breast adenocarcinoma
`MCF7
`Renal carcinoma
`A-498
`Lung carcinoma
`A549
`B. Highly sensitive group
`Glioblastoma
`U-373MG
`SEKI-F
`Malignant melanoma
`Breast carcinoma
`BT-20
`Uterine cervical carcinoma
`HeLa
`Glioblastoma
`U-138MG
`HT-144
`Malignant melanoma
`Lung adenocarcinoma
`SK-LU-I
`C. Sensitive group
`SK-MEL-28
`MKN-1
`HEC-lC
`ACHN
`KPI
`MKN-28
`KB
`SK-CO-I
`D. Resistant group
`I.O X 106<
`E
`Normal diploid fibroblast
`HF8209
`I.OX 106<
`E
`Normal diploid fibroblast
`HF82! 1
`'I.O X 106<
`E
`Normal diploid fibroblast
`M08
`The colony count was carried out by using a colony counter (Colony Analyzer CA-7, Orient Instruments Ltd.,
`Japan).
`a) A, 10% fetal bovine serum/D-MEM; B, 10% fetal bovine serum/MEM; C, 10% fetal bovine serum/
`RPMI 1640; D, 10% fetal bovine serum/Ham's Fl2; E, 20% fetal bovine serum/L-15; F, 20% fetal
`bovine serum/MEM; G, 20% fetal bovine serum/MEM/non-essential amino acids/2mM sodium pyruvate.
`All media were supplemented with IOmM HEPES.
`
`2.8 X 101
`3.0 X 101
`4.3 X 101
`
`1.8 X 102
`2.5 X 10'
`2.7 X 10'
`3.0Xl02
`4.5 X 102
`4.7 X 102
`5.4 X 102
`
`1.0 X 10'
`1.1 X 10'
`2.4 X 10'
`4.0 X IO'
`4.5 X 10'
`8.3 X 10'
`4.0 X 104
`2.3 X JOl
`
`A
`D
`A
`
`G
`F
`D
`A
`E
`E
`B
`
`D
`C
`A
`A
`D
`A
`A
`B
`
`Malignant melanoma
`Stomach adenocarcinoma
`Uterine adenocarcinoma
`Renal adenocarcinoma
`Renal pelvic carcinoma
`Stomach adenocarcinoma
`Oral epidermoid carcinoma
`Colon adenocarcinoma
`
`78(2) 1987
`
`195
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2089
`Breckenridge v. Novartis, IPR 2017-01592
`Page 3 of 9
`
`

`

`M. NOBUHARA, ET AL.
`
`Inhibition of DNA, RNA and protein
`Fig. 1.
`syntheses of MCF7 ceJls. • , DNA; o, RNA; 6,
`protein. CeJls were inoculated in 15.5 mm¢ well
`dishes at a concentration of 4 X 10' cells/ml/dish in
`D-MEM supplemented with 5% bovine serum, and
`cultured for 3 days at 37°. The culture was con(cid:173)
`tinued for another 0, 3, 8, 16 and 24 hr in the
`presence of 106 U/ml of n-TNF. At the indicated
`time,
`the medium was changed
`to
`fresh
`methionine-free MEM containing 106 U/ml of
`n-TNF, and the cells were pulse-labeled for 1 hr
`with (3H)thymidine (0.55 µCi/weJI), [3H]uridine
`(5.5 µCi/well) or [3'S)methionine (5.5 µCi/well)
`as described in "Materials and Methods." The
`trichloroacetic acid-insoluble
`isotopic count in
`fractions was measured in a liquid scintillation
`counter (Liquid Scintillation System LSC-700,
`Aloka). The figures indicate the relative values as
`compared with control groups at each time.
`
`8
`16
`Incubation Time (hr)
`
`24
`
`1000
`
`12hr
`
`24hr
`
`500
`
`0
`
`!:!J.
`Q)
`(.)
`....
`0 ... Q)
`.0 1000
`E
`::::l z
`
`500
`
`DNA Content
`
`Fig. 2. DNA histogram of MCF7 ceJls treated with n-TNF. (a) Control (b) 106 U/ml. CeJls
`were inoculated in 60 mm¢ Petri dishes at a concentration of 2.5 X 10' ceJls/10 ml/dish in
`D-MEM supplemented with 5% calf serum, and cultured for 2 days at 37°. The cells were treated
`with n-TNF for another 12, 24 or 36 hr. At the indicated time, ceJls were detached from the dishes
`with 0.25% pronase P, treated with 1 % sodium azide and fixed with 70% ethanol. They were
`stocked at - 20° until analysis. Flow cytometric analysis was conducted after treating the cells
`with 50 µg/ml of propidium iodide and 1 mg/ml of RNase as described in "Materials and
`Methods."
`
`treatment with 106 U/ml of n-TNF. These
`results strongly suggest that n-TNF mainly
`blocked the G1-phase of the cell cycle.
`Figure 3 shows that n-TNF also inhibited
`the cell growth of MCF7 cells in the mass
`culture method, and immediate reprolifera(cid:173)
`tion of MCF7 cells was observed on changing
`to fresh culture medium without n-TNF at a
`
`growth rate similar to that of the control cells.
`Isobologram analysis indicated clear syn(cid:173)
`ergistic effects ofn-TNF and human IFN-a or
`ACNU in the inhibition of colony formation,
`as shown in Fig. 4. It was also observed that 5-
`FU and MMC inhibited synergistically, and
`DXR inhibited additively the cell prolifera(cid:173)
`tion of ACHN cells in the presence of n-TNF
`
`196
`
`Jpn. J. Cancer Res. (Gann)
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2089
`Breckenridge v. Novartis, IPR 2017-01592
`Page 4 of 9
`
`

`

`HUMAN NATURAL TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR
`
`1X105 -
`
`FICIFN
`1.0
`
`' ' ',,
`
`0.5
`
`{a)
`
`' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ',
`
`FICIFN
`
`' ' ',
`
`{b)
`
`' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
`
`' ' '
`
`o-l--.....:=:=::==~
`
`1X104
`
`r ~
`
`8
`6
`4
`Incubation Period (days)
`
`FICIFN
`
`FIG ACNU
`
`,b
`
`Fig. 3. Reversible in_hibition by n-TNF of the cell
`proliferation of MCF7 cells. O, Control; (cid:143) , 10• U/
`ml; 6, 105 U/ml. Cells were inoculated into a 96-
`. microwell plate at a concentration of0.2 X 10• cells/
`0.2 ml/well in D-MEM supplemented with 5%
`bovine serum. One day later, n-TNF was added to
`give a final concentration of 10•. or 105 U/ml, and
`the culture was continued for a further 2 days
`(indicated by hatched bars). After the 2-day treat(cid:173)
`ment with n-TNF, cells were cultured for another 7
`days in fresh medium without n-TNF.
`
`(data not shown). Interestingly, HEC-lC
`cells, which are totally resistant to IFN-a
`> also
`because they lack the IFN receptor, 10
`showed synergistic inhibition of colony for(cid:173)
`mation by the combination of n-TNF and
`IFN-a.
`Receptor analysis shows that all the cell
`lines including a normal fibroblast cell line
`expressed the n-TNF receptor on the cell sur(cid:173)
`face (Table II). Even normal fibroblast cells,
`which are resistant to n-TNF, expressed the
`receptor on the cell surface with similar Kd
`value and receptor number to those of sensi(cid:173)
`tive abnormal cell lines. We could not observe
`any correlation between n-TNF sensitivity
`and affinity/number of the receptor.
`In vivo Experiments The tumor mass increase
`of Meth A sarcoma was significantly inhibited
`by both iv and itu administration of n-TNF at
`doses of 2 X 105-2 X 106 U/mouse, as shown in
`Table III. In addition, a high frequency of
`complete tumor regression was observed in
`both itu and iv administration groups. The
`
`78(2) 1987
`
`0.5
`FICTNF
`
`0
`
`0.5
`FICTNF
`
`1.0
`
`Isobologram studies on the combination
`Fig. 4.
`of n-TNF and human IFN-a (a, b, c) or ACNU
`(d). (a) Renal adenocarcinoma ACHN, (b) malig(cid:173)
`nant melanoma SK-MEL-28, (c) glioblastoma U-
`373MG, (d) renal adenocarcinoma ACHN. Either
`200 cells/2 ml for SK-MEL-28 cells or 500 cells/2
`ml for ACHN and U-373MG cells was inoculated
`into 35 mm¢ dishes in the media listed in• Table I
`and cultured for 7-9 days in the presence of n-TNF
`(0-1 X 10(cid:141) U/ml) and human IFN-a (0-5 x 10' IU/
`ml) or ACNU (0-40 µg/ml). After Giemsa stain(cid:173)
`ing, the number of colonies was counted in order
`to obtain the fractional inhibitory concentration
`(FIC) for n-TNF (FICmp) and human IFN-a
`(FIC1PN) or ACNU (FIC;.CN1J) by the method de(cid:173)
`scribed in "Materials and Methods."
`
`antitumor activity by the itu route, however,
`seemed to be 3 to 10 times stronger than that
`by the iv route.
`Table IV shows that intratumoral adminis(cid:173)
`tration of n-TNF also effectively suppressed
`the mass increase of human tumors implanted
`into BALB/c nu/nu mice. In particular,
`ACHN tumor was a very sensitive model; 5
`out of 6 mice were completely cured by daily
`itu administration of 2 X 106 U/mouse. The
`combined effect of n-TNF and human IFN-a
`on U-373MG glioblastoma was also studied in
`vivo by daily itu administration (Table IV).
`
`197
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2089
`Breckenridge v. Novartis, IPR 2017-01592
`Page 5 of 9
`
`

`

`M. NOBUHARA, ET AL.
`
`Cell line
`
`Kd
`(M X IO")
`
`IC,a''
`(U/ml)
`
`Medium
`used"
`
`Table II. n-TNF Receptor Analysis in the Absence or the Presence of Human IFN-a
`No. of
`receptor/cell
`( X 10- ')
`A
`2.8 X 101
`7.7
`7.8
`MCF7
`B
`3.0X 101
`3.9
`1.7
`A-498
`B
`1.8 X 102
`5.6
`3.5
`U-373MG
`A
`2.4X 103
`9.8
`8.4
`HEC-IC
`C
`2.3 X 10'
`2.3
`2.7
`SK-CO-I
`LOX 106<
`D
`7.2
`8.1
`HF8209
`Cells were inoculated into 35 mm¢ dishes (6-18 X IO' cells/dish) and incubated overnight at 37°. "'1-n-TNF
`(ca. 3.8 mCi/mg protein) in 0. I% HSA/D-MEM was added to each dish (2 X 10'- l X IO' cpm/dish), f~llowed
`by incubation at 37° for 2 hr either in the presence or absence of 1.4 µg/dish of cold n-T~F protem. The
`specific binding of n-TNF on the cell surface was counted in the I% SDS cell lysate by usmg an autowell
`gamma system ARC-300 (Aloka, Tokyo).
`a) Each IC50 value is cited from Table I.
`b) A, 5% bovine serum/D-MEM; B, 10% fetal bovine serum/MEM/non-essential amino acids/2mM
`sodium pyruvate; C, 10% fetal bovine serum/MEM; D, 10% bovine serum/D-MEM.
`
`Table III.
`
`Group
`
`Route
`
`Complete
`regression
`0/6
`0/6
`1/6
`3/6
`0/6
`1/6
`4/6
`
`In vivo Antitumor Effect of n-TNF on Meth A Sarcoma
`Tumor weight''
`Dose
`(mg)
`(U/mouse)
`1520 ± 256
`861 ± 108*
`529 ± 132 * *
`176±84**
`1520± 130
`644±159*
`52±44*
`
`2X 10'
`6X 10'
`2 X 106
`
`iv
`iv
`iv
`iv
`itu
`itu
`itu
`
`Control
`n-TNF
`n-TNF
`n-TNF
`Control
`2 X 10'
`n-TNF
`6 X 10'
`n-TNF
`'P< 0.05, "P< 0.01.
`a) Mean± SE.
`Ascitic Meth A sarcoma cells (2 X JO' cells/0.1 ml), which had been serially passaged in BALB/c mice, were
`id implanted into CBF, mice. Seven to nine days later, when the tumor became palpable, n-TNF was
`administered iv or itu once every three days for 15 days. On day 15 the excised tumor was weighed and
`complete regression was macroscopically checked.
`
`The results show that the combined effect of
`n-TNF and human IFN-a in vivo was definite(cid:173)
`ly synergistic, in agreement with the results of
`the in vitro isobologram studies;
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`We have shown here that human leukemic
`B cells (BALL-1 cell line) produced n-TNF
`on viral stimulation with Sendai virus. Al(cid:173)
`though n-TNF effectively inhibited the cell
`proliferation of this human cancer-derived
`cell line in a reversible manner, n-TNF did not
`affect the colony formation of normal fibro(cid:173)
`biast cell lines. It is suggested that this inhibi(cid:173)
`tion is mainly due to the specific reduction of
`DNA synthesis at the G,-phase of the cell
`cycle (Figs. 1 and 2).
`
`198
`
`This specific in vitro antiproliferative activ(cid:173)
`ity against abnormal cells coincides well with
`other reports.''·!4> With the aim of explaining
`the mechanism of specific inhibition of abnor(cid:173)
`mal cell growth, several studies have been
`conducted from the viewpoint of the affinity/
`5> Our results dem(cid:173)
`number ofTNF receptors. 3
`l-l
`onstrate that the sensitivity of each cell line is
`not directly dependent upon the affinity/
`number of the receptors. Baglioni et a/. 35> re(cid:173)
`cently found a positive correlation between
`the degree of sensitivity to TNF and the
`number of the receptors, but other groupsll,!4l
`could not observe any correlation between
`them. It is possible that Baglioni et al. might
`have obtained positive results just by chance,
`because only three cell lines were used in their
`
`Jpn. J. Cancer Res. (Gann)
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2089
`Breckenridge v. Novartis, IPR 2017-01592
`Page 6 of 9
`
`

`

`Table IV.
`
`Group
`
`6XJ0'
`2X 10'
`
`6X 10'
`2 X IO'
`
`2 X 10'
`
`2 X 10'
`6 X 10' IU
`2 X 10'
`+6 x 10• IU
`
`126 ± 11
`84 ± 13•
`49 ± 3 .. -
`
`74± 12
`6 ± 3**
`2 ± 2 ..
`
`721±113
`226±40**
`868 ± 175
`714 ± 134
`625 ± 164
`
`166 + 77• •
`
`HUMAN NATURAL TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR
`In vivo Antitumor Effect of n-TNF on Human-derived Tumors
`Tumor weight•l
`Dose
`(mg)
`(U/mouse)
`SK-MEL-28 (malignant melanoma)
`Control
`n-TNF
`n-TNF
`ACHN (renal adenocarcinoma)
`Control
`n-TNF
`n-TNF
`U-373MG (glioblastoma)
`Exp. I Control
`n-TNF
`Exp. 2 Control
`n-TNF
`IFN-a
`n-TNF
`+IFN-a
`' P<0.05, .. P<0.01.
`a) Mean ± SE.
`One tumor fragment (2- 3 mm in size), which had been serially passaged in BALB/c nu/nu mice, was sc
`implanted into BALB/c nu/nu mice. Ten days to three weeks later, when the tumor became palpable, the daily
`itu administration of n-TNF and IFN-a was started for 14 days (SK-MEL-28 and U-373MG) or 28 days
`(ACHN) . On day 14 (SK-MEL-28 and U-373MG) or on day 28 (ACHN), the excised tumor was weighed
`and complete regression was macroscopically checked.
`
`Complete
`regression
`
`0/6
`0/6
`0/6
`
`0/6
`3/6
`5/6
`
`0/6
`0/6
`0/5
`0/5
`0/5
`
`0/5
`
`study. It seems likely that an unknown in(cid:173)
`tracellular mechanism(s) involving the recep(cid:173)
`tor must exist to explain these experimental
`results.
`In in vivo studies, n-TNF showed a strong
`antitumor activity against both murine and
`human solid tumors, which often completely
`regressed in the cases of murine Meth A and
`human ACHN tumors (Tables III and IV).
`and
`clear hemorrhagic
`a
`Furthermore,
`necrotic appearance of Meth A tumor was
`commonly observed as early as on day 1 of
`ad(cid:173)
`intratumoral
`and
`intravenous
`both
`ministrations of n-TNF. A similar necrotic
`appearance was also observed in the murine
`Lewis lung carcinoma model (unpublished
`data), while n-TNF induced no apparent ne(cid:173)
`crosis in any human tumor model, even a
`highly sensitive one such as ACHN. These
`observations suggest that the antitumor mech(cid:173)
`anism(s) of n-TNF are somewhat different
`the human tumor model (nu/nu
`between
`mice) and the murine tumor model (CBF)
`mice). It was observed that severe destruction
`of the vascular system causes hemorrhagic
`necrosis in the case of murine solid tumor as
`
`78(2) 1987
`
`judged from the histopathological findings on
`Meth A tumor (data not shown), but this
`destruction may not occur in human tumor
`models. Therefore, it is presumed that T cell(cid:173)
`related function or some deficient gene(s) in
`BALB/c nu/nu mice might be involved in the
`hemorrhagic necrosis.
`The studies of combined n-TNF and human
`IFN-a provided direct evidence that they syn(cid:173)
`ergistically inhibit in vitro cell proliferation
`and in vivo tumor growth. An in vitro syn(cid:173)
`ergistic cytotoxic effect of TNF and IFN-r
`reported by Aggarwal
`has recently been
`et al. 1'> They stated that IFN-r stimulated the
`number of TNF receptors on the cell surface
`two- to three-fold, with a similar Kd value to
`those of IFN-r-untreated cells, and speculated
`that this increment of the number possibly
`augments TNF activity. Williamson et a/. 31
`reported that the cell-killing activity of par(cid:173)
`tially purified human natural TNF, which was
`secreted from a hematopoietic cell line stim(cid:173)
`ulated with tumor promoter, was augmented
`by combining it with IFN-a and -r. It is
`reasonable, therefore, to think that the syn(cid:173)
`ergism observed in our in vitro studies can also
`199
`
`>
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2089
`Breckenridge v. Novartis, IPR 2017-01592
`Page 7 of 9
`
`

`

`M. NOBUHARA, ET AL.
`be explained as resulting from the same mech(cid:173)
`anism as proposed by Aggarwal! et al. 16
`>
`In the model using nu/nu mice it is thought
`that human IFN-a inhibits the tumor growth
`directly but not through any host-mediated
`system because of the species-dependent
`specificity of IFN-a. Accordingly, participa(cid:173)
`tion of a host-mediated mechanism in the nu/
`nu mice system seems unlikely to be able to
`explain our in vivo synergy.
`It would seem to be worth setting up a
`clinical trial to examine whether the anti(cid:173)
`tumor activity of n-TNF can be augmented
`by combined therapy with human IFN-a
`through direct and probably also indirect
`mechanisms.
`
`ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
`We thank Miss M. Katayama and Mr. K. Baba
`for their help in the in vitro studies and Mr. S.
`Murakami and Mr. Y. Harada for their help in the
`in vivo experiments. We also thank Miss Y.
`Yamaguchi and Miss R. Nakano for typing the
`manuscript.
`(Received Nov. 11, 1986/Accepted Dec. 27, 1986)
`
`REFERENCES
`1) Carswell, E. A., Old, L. J., Kasel, R. L.,
`Green, S., Fiore, N. and Williamson, B. An
`endotoxin-induced serum factor that causes
`necrosis · of tumors. Proc. Natl. A cad. Sci.
`USA., 12, 3666-3670 (1975).
`2) Matthews, N. Tumor-necrosis factor from
`the rabbit. II. Production by monocytes. Br.
`J. Cancer, 38, 310-315 (1978).
`3) Manne!, D. N., Moore, R. N. and Mergen(cid:173)
`hagen, S. E. Macrophages as a source of
`tumoricidal
`activity
`(tumor-necrotizing
`factor). lnfec. lmmun., 30, 523-530 (1980).
`4) Rubin, B. Y., Anderson, S. L., Sullivan, S.
`A., Williamson, B. D., Carswell, E. A. and
`Old, L. J. Purification and characterization
`of a human tumor necrosis factor from the
`LuK II cell line. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
`82, 6637- 6641 (1985).
`5) Haranaka, K., Satdmi, N., Sakurai, A. and
`Nariuchi, H. Purification and partial amino
`acid sequence of rabbit tumor necrosis fac(cid:173)
`tor. Int. J. Cancer, 36, 395-400 (1985) ..
`6) Pennica, D., Nedwin, G. E., Hayflick, J. S.,
`Seeburg, P. H., Dernyck, R., Palladino, M.
`A., Kohr, W. J., Aggarwal, B. B. and
`
`200
`
`Goedde), D. V. Human tumor necrosis
`factor: precursor structure, expression and
`homology to lymphotoxin. Nature, 312, 724-
`729 (1984).
`7) Miyoshi,
`I., Hiraki, S., Tsubota, T.,
`Kubonishi, I., Matsuda, Y., Nakayama, T.,
`Kishimoto, H. and Kimura, I. Human B
`cell, T cell and null cell Jeukaemic cell lines
`derived from acute lymphoblastic leukae(cid:173)
`mias. Nature, 261, 843-844 (1977).
`8) Soule, H. D., Vazquez, J., Long, A., Albert,
`S. and Brennan, M. A human cell line from
`a pleural effusion derived from a breast carci(cid:173)
`noma. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 51, 1409- 1416
`(1973).
`9) Hojo, H. Establishment of cultured cell lines
`of human stomach cancer: origin and their
`morphological characteristics. Niigata Med.
`J., 91, 737-763 ( 1977).
`10) Morinaga, N., Yonehara, S., Tomita, Y. and
`Kuwata, T.
`Insensitivity to interferon of
`two subclones of human endometrial carci(cid:173)
`noma cell line, HEC-1. Jnt. J. Cancer, 31, 21 -
`28 (1983) .
`11) Naito, S., Tanaka, K., Kanamori, T.,
`Hisano, S. and Momose, S. Establishment of
`a human renal pelvic cancer cell line produc(cid:173)
`ing tissue thromboplastin and plasminogen
`activator. Ural. Res., 10, 19-25 ( 1982).
`12) Shimoyama, M., Ishihara, K., Sakano, T.
`and Kimura, K. A suspension cultured cell
`line established from a malignant melanoma.
`Proc. Jpn. Cancer Assoc., 30th Ann. Meet.,
`219 (1971).
`13) Carey, T. E., Takahashi, T., Resnic, L. A.,
`Oettgen, H. F. and Old, L. J. Cell surface
`antigens of human malignant melanoma:
`mixed hemadsorption assays for humoral im(cid:173)
`munity to cultured autologous . melanoma
`cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 73, 3278-
`3282 (1976).
`14) Beckman, G., Beckman, L., Ponten, J. and
`Westennark, B. G-6-PD and PGM pheno(cid:173)
`types of 16 continuous human tumor cell
`lines: evidence against cross-contamination
`and contamination by HeLa cells. Hum.
`Hered., 21, 238- 241 (1971).
`15) Tanaka, A., Matsuoka, H., Uemura, H.,
`Kakui, Y., Imanishi, T., Nishino, H. and
`Imanishi, J. Production and characterization
`of tumor degenerating factor. J. Natl. Cancer
`Inst., 74, 575-581 (1985).
`16) Giard, D. J., Aaronson, S. A., Todaro, G. J.,
`Arnstein, P., Kersey, J. H., Dosik, H. and
`Parks, W. P. In vitro cultivation of human
`tumors: establishment of cell lines derived
`from a series of solid tumors. J. Natl. Cancer
`Inst., 51, 1417- 1423 (1973).
`
`Jpn. J. Cancer Res. (Gann)
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2089
`Breckenridge v. Novartis, IPR 2017-01592
`Page 8 of 9
`
`

`

`HUMAN NATURAL TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR
`
`22)
`
`117) Lasfargues, E. Y. and Ozzello, L. Cultiva(cid:173)
`tion of Human breast carcinomas. J. Natl.
`Cancer Inst., 21, 1131- 1147 ( 1985).
`18) Fogh, J., Wright, W. C. and Loveless, J. D.
`Absence of HeLa cell contamination in 169
`cell lines derived from human tumors. J.
`Natl. Cancerlnst., 58, 209- 214 ( 1977).
`19) Gey, G . 0., Coffman, W. D. and Kubicek,
`M. T. Tissue culture studies of the prolifera(cid:173)
`tive capacity of cervical carcinoma and
`normal epithelium. Cancer Res., 12, 264-265
`(1952).
`20) Borden, E. C., Hogan, T. F. and Voelkel, J.
`G. Comparative antiproliferative activity in
`vitro of natural interferons a and f3 for dip(cid:173)
`loid and transformed human cells. Cancer
`Res., 42, 4948---4953 (1982).
`21) Eagle, H . Propagation in a fluid medium of a
`human epidermoid carcinoma, strain KB .
`Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med., 89, 362- 364 ( 1955).
`Imanishi, J., Pak, C. B., Kawamura, H.,
`Kita, M., Sugino, S., Sakamoto, M.,
`Tanimoto, T., Masuda, K., Yokobayashi, K.,
`Mitsuhashi, M., Nagano, Y. and Kishida, T.
`Production and characterization of interfer(cid:173)
`on from human leukemic lymphoblastoid
`cells grown in hamsters. J. Appl. Biochem., 2,
`257- 269 (1980).
`23) Tanimoto, T. Production and purification of
`interferon from human leukemic lympho(cid:173)
`blastoid cells (BALL- I) grown in hamsters.
`J. Kyoto Pref Univ. Med., 91, 1321- 1331
`( 1982).
`24) Cantell, K. and Hirvonen, S. Preparation
`and assay of Sendai virus. Methods Enzymol.,
`78, 299- 301 (1981).
`25) Laemmli, U. K. Cleavage of structural pro(cid:173)
`teins during the assembly of the head of
`bacteriophage T4. Nature, 221, 680-685
`( 1970).
`26) Nobuhara, M., Kanamori, T ., Nagase, Y.,
`Nii, A., Morishita, H., Tohyama, J., Andoh, S.
`and Kurimoto, T. The expression of human
`tumor necr

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket