throbber
NEOPLASIA - - - -- - - - -- -- - - --
`
`- - - - - - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - -- --
`
`Endostatin, an antiangiogenic d1ug, induces tumor stabilization after
`chemotherapy or anti-CD20 therapy in a NOD/SCID mouse 1nodel
`of human high-grade non-Hodgkin lymph01na
`Francesco Bertolini, Lisa Fusetti, Patrizia Mancuso, Alberto Gobbi, Chiara Corsini, Pier Francesco Ferrucci,
`Giovanni Martinelli, and Giancarlo Pruneri
`
`Both chemotherapy and chimeric anti(cid:173)
`CD20 monoclonal antibodies are effective
`agents against B-cell non-Hodgkin lym(cid:173)
`phoma (NHL). However, patients achiev(cid:173)
`ing remission are at risk of relapse. To
`evaluate the effect of the antiangiogenic
`drug endostatin used alone and after the
`administration of cyclophosphamide
`(CTX) or the anti-CD20 antibody ritux(cid:173)
`imab, we generated a new model of
`human NHL by transplanting Namalwa
`cells intraperitoneally into nonobese dia(cid:173)
`betic/severe combined immunodeficient
`(NOD/SCIO) mice. First, we determined
`the most effective treatment schedule for
`the drugs assessed. When administered
`alone, CTX (3 courses of 75 mg/kg of
`
`body weight given intraperitoneally), ritux(cid:173)
`imab (3 courses of 25 mg/kg given
`(5
`intraperitoneally), and endostatin
`courses of 50 µg given subcutaneously)
`delayed tumor growth, and CTX was the
`most effective in controlling bulky dis(cid:173)
`ease. When given after chemotherapy or
`immunotherapy, endostatin effectively in(cid:173)
`duced tumor stabilization. When mice
`given CTX or rituximab on days 3, 5, and 7
`after transplantation were randomly as(cid:173)
`signed to receive endostatin or phos(cid:173)
`phate-buffered saline on days 15 to 19,
`in end-
`tumor growth was prevented
`ostatin-treated mice as long as the drug
`was administered. Furthermore, adminis(cid:173)
`tration of endostatin on days 25 to 29
`
`after tumor regrowth still induced signifi(cid:173)
`cant tumor regression, whereas CTX and
`rituximab were not effective. The specific
`antiangiogenic action of endostatin was
`confirmed by in vitro and in vivo studies
`indicating that the drug inhibited prolifera(cid:173)
`tion and induced apoptosis of endothelial
`(but not of NHL) cells. In conclusion,
`sequential administration of chemother(cid:173)
`apy and endostatin seems promising for
`treating bulky NHL, and the less toxic
`sequential administration of rituximab
`and endostatin is promising for treating
`limited disease. (Blood. 2000;96:282-287)
`
`'-'· 2000 by The American Society of Hematology
`
`Introduction
`
`Despite recent advances in the treatment of B-cell non-Hodgkin
`lymphoma (NHL) and the introduction into mainstream hematology(cid:173)
`oncology of the chimeric anti-CD20 antibody rituximab, approxi(cid:173)
`mately one half of patients with NHL who achieve partial or complete
`remission after chemotherapy or immunotherapy do relapse. 1
`Because the growth of most types of cancers,2 possibly including
`hematologic malignancics,3·5 depe nds on the generation of new
`blood vessels, it was proposed that antiangiogenic therapy may
`induce solid-tumor dormancy or stab ilization. 2 Preclinical studies
`of antiangiogenic therapy in nonhematologic malignancies con(cid:173)
`firmed this hypothesis 6 Moreover, the antiangiogcnic drug thalido(cid:173)
`mide was found to be effective in patients with refractory myeloma,
`another B-eell malignancy. 7 In addition, a new generation of
`antiangiogenic drngs was determined to be significantly more etlective
`than thalidomide in inhibiting the growth of endothelial cells. 2 We
`generated a novel murine model of human B-cell N 11 L to evaluate
`the effect of the new antiangiogcnic drug endostatin 8 used alone
`and sequentially after chemotherapy or immunotherapy.
`Mice bearing the nude or severe combined immunodefici ent
`(SCIO) mutation have been used extensively to evaluate human
`malignancies in vivo. However, these strains have residual immu(cid:173)
`nity that may limit posttransp lantation neoplastic cell growth, and
`
`evidence has indicated that the nonobese diabetic/SCIO (NOD/
`SCIO) strain is more convenient for human leukemia and lym(cid:173)
`phoma xenotransplantation. 9• 11 With the aim of generating a
`disease similar to human high-grade B-cell NHL, we used intraperi(cid:173)
`toneal instead of subcutaneous transplantations in NOD/SCID mice
`and found that Namalwa cells generated intraperitoneal tumors in
`the injection site. These tumors cou ld be precisely measured with
`ca lipers to evaluate the ctlicacy of different therapies.
`
`Materials and methods
`
`Cell lines and in vitro studies of endostatin
`
`line (phenotype CDJ - , CDI0 +, CDl3 - , CDl9 +,
`The Namalwa ce ll
`CD20 +, GlyA - ) derives from an Epstein-Barr virus- pos iti ve Burki II NI·IL.
`It was obtained from the American Type Culture Collect ion (Ma nassas, VA)
`and cu ltured in RPMI and 8% fetal bov ine scrum (FBS; HyClonc, L ogan ,
`UT). Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) were obtained from
`Cascade Biologics (Portland. OR) and cultured in medium 200 (Cascade
`Biologics) supplemented with 2% FBS and IO ng/mL each of vascular
`endothelia l growth factor (VEGF) and basic fibroblast growth factor
`(b-FGF; Pcprotech, Rocky Hill, NJ). lluman recombinant cndostntin
`
`From the Divisions of Hematology-Oncology, Experimental Oncology, and
`Pathology-Laboratory Medicine, IRCCS European Institute of Oncology,
`Milan. Italy.
`
`Submilled December 30, 1999; accepted February 24, 2000.
`
`Reprints: Francesco Bertolini, Hematology-Oncology Unit, European Institute of
`Oncology, via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; e-mail: f.bertolini@agora.stm.it.
`
`The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge
`payment. Therefore , and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby
`marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734.
`
`F.B. is a scholar of the US National Bl ood Foundation.
`
`([) 2000 by The American Society of Hematology
`
`282
`
`BLOOD, 1 JULY 2000 • VO LUME 96, NUMBER 1
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2076
`Breckenridge v. Novartis, IPR 2017-01592
`Page 1 of 6
`
`

`

`BLOOD, 1 JULY 2000 • VOLUME 96, NUMBER 1
`
`ENDOSTATIN, CTX,AND RITUXIMAB IN MURINE NHL
`
`283
`
`produced in Pichia pastoris was obtained from Calbiochcm (San Diego,
`CA). In accordance with the findings of O' Reilly ct al,8 cndostatin activity
`was tested in vitro on HUVEC and Namalwa cells at concentrations ranging
`from 250 to I 000 ng/mL.
`
`Animal studies
`
`Our model of high-grade human NHL was generated by injecting 6- to
`8-,week-old NOD/SCIO mice intraperitoncally with 10 X 106 Namalwa
`cells. The mice were evaluated for tumor growth every other day. Tumor
`volume was measured with calipers, and the formula, width2 X length X
`0.52, was applied to approximate the volume of a spheroid, as described
`previously. 6 Injections of treatment agents were given in a site remote from
`the inoculated tumor. Cyclophosphamide (CTX; Sigma, St Louis, MO) and
`the chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab (Roche, Monza,
`Italy) were given intraperitoneally, whereas endostatin was given subcuta(cid:173)
`neously. Control mice received intraperitoneal or subcutaneous injections
`of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Tumor-bearing mice were killed by
`carbon dioxide asphyxiation, and tumor engraftment was confirmed by
`histologic, immunohistochemislly (IHC), and flow cytometry (FC) studies.
`All procedures involving animals were done in accordance with national
`and international laws and policies.
`For histologic and IHC evaluations, tumor samples were fixed in I 0%
`formalin and embedded in paraffin. Then, 4-µm-thick sections were stained
`with hematoxylin and eosin and with Giemsa stain for conventional
`histologic assessment. For IHC, sections were immunostained with anti(cid:173)
`CD l 0 and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (DAKO, Glostmp, Denmark).
`Tumor expression of human CD 19 and CD20 antigens was evaluated by FC
`using monoclonal antibodies from Becton Dickinson (Mountain View; CA).
`Tumor angiogenesis was evaluated by FC using a new monoclonal antibody
`(Phanningen, San Diego, CA) against murine FLK, a VEGF-related
`receptor found on endothelial cells. Fresh tumors were dissolved at the
`single-cell level, and 500 to I 000 X l 03 cells were incubated at 22°C for 30
`minutes in PBS and I% bovine serum albumin with monoclonal antibodies.
`The percentage of stained cells was determined in comparison with an
`isotypic control by using a fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACScalibur;
`Becton Dickinson). A portion of each sample was incubated with the
`appropriate isotype control antibodies to establish the background level of
`nonspecific staining, and positivity was defined as staining greater than
`nonspecific background staining. To identify apoptotic and dead cells,
`7-amino actinomycin D (7AAD) was used as described previously. 12
`
`Statistical analysis
`
`Statistical comparisons were done with r tests and analysis of variance when
`data were normally distributed. Nonparametric Spearman and Mann(cid:173)
`Whitney analyses were used when data were not normally distributed. P
`values lower than 0.05 were considered to represent significance.
`
`Resu lts
`
`Atier intraperitoneal injection of 10 X I 06 Namalwa cells, measur(cid:173)
`able tumors developed in the injection site in all mice given the
`transplants (in the middle of the right posterior quadrant of the
`abdomen; Figure I). Tumors grew as solid masses in the peritoneal
`cavity that infiltrated the peritoneum of the abdominal wall. In a
`few cases, infiltration of the small and large bowel also occurred.
`Tumors were composed of large cells growing in a diffuse pattern,
`with round or slightly convoluted nuclei, at least I eosinophilic
`nucleolus, and a thin rim of basophilic cytoplasm. A few larger cells
`with 2 or more nuclei were also present. Apoptotic bodies were
`observed frequently, and larger areas of necrosis were also
`detectable. Scattered among the neoplastic cells were a few
`histiocytes, although a "starry-sky" pattern was not evident.
`Visible and measurable tumors were observed beginning on day I 0
`after transplantation. When left untreated, tumors reached a volume
`of approximately 5000 mm3 by day 20 (Figures 2-9). This pattern
`
`Figure 1. Namalwa tumor grow1ti in nonobese diabetic-severe combined
`immunodeficient (NOD/SCIO) mice given transplants of 10 x 106 cells intraper(cid:173)
`itoneally. A control mouse is shown on the bottom. The tumor growing in the injection
`site (arrow) is visible and measurable in the mouse that had transplantation (top).
`
`of tumor growth was similar to that previously described in a
`subcutaneous model ofNamalwa cell xenotransplantation. 10 In the
`first 30 days after transplantation, tumor metastasis in sites other
`than the injection site was not observed. In some mice that were
`given transplants and not treated, metastasis to regional lymph
`nodes and multiple visceral organs was observed during the second
`month after transplantation.
`
`CTX, rituximab, and endostatin used as single agents
`
`We first determined the most appropriate treatment schedule for
`rituximab, CTX, and endostatin used as single agents (n = 4-10
`animals per group). In our NOD/SCID mouse model, the maximum
`
`100000
`
`E 10000
`
`.......
`
`-M
`E -(l)
`
`E
`:J
`0
`>
`0
`E
`:J
`I-
`
`I,,.
`
`1000
`
`CTX
`
`.1.
`
`100
`
`10
`
`iii
`,.,,-·;
`1 - ' 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
`
`Day
`
`Figure 2. Results of treatment with 2 different doses of cyclophosphamide
`(CTX). NOD/SCIO mice given transplants of 10 x 106 Namalwa cells intraperitone(cid:173)
`ally were treated with either 150 mg/kg of body weight of CTX or 75 mg/kg of CTX on
`days 3, 5, and 7. When 150 mg/kg of CTX was administered(• , n = 10), 60% of the
`mice died of drug-related toxicity. When 75 mg/kg of CTX was given ((cid:127)
`, n = 10),
`none of the mice died of drug-related toxicity, and the delay in tumor growth was not
`significantly different than at the higher dose. The dotted line indicates tumor growth
`in 6 untreated controls (A). Results are mean:±: SD values for tumor volume.
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2076
`Breckenridge v. Novartis, IPR 2017-01592
`Page 2 of 6
`
`

`

`284
`
`BERTOLINI et al
`
`BLOOD, 1 JULY 2000 • VOLUME 96, NUMBER 1
`
`(Figure 4). For endostatin, our in vitro studies indicated that 250 to
`1000 ng/mL of this agent inhibited 34% to 66% ofHUVEC prolifera(cid:173)
`tion , whereas no effect was observed on Namalwa cell proliferation
`(P < .001; Figure SA). In vivo, 5 courses of 50 µg endostatin given
`on days 3 to 7 significantly delayed tumor growth (Figure SB).
`
`CTX, rituximab, and endostatin used sequentially
`
`Four to 6 animals per group were evaluated in sequential(cid:173)
`administration studies. When given after CTX or rituximab,
`
`__ ,,1
`J.· ..
`
`1..
`
`100000
`
`E 10000
`
`-M
`E -Q)
`
`E
`::1
`0
`>
`lo..
`0
`E
`::1
`I-
`
`1000
`
`100 -
`
`10
`
`Rituximab
`
`! ! !
`
`I
`
`,•
`
`A 100
`90
`80
`70
`60
`50
`40
`30
`20
`10 -
`0
`
`r:: -0 ... C:
`
`C:
`0
`:;;
`.c
`.c:
`
`Q)
`~
`<1)
`a.
`
`5
`
`0
`
`10 15 20 25 30
`Day
`Figure 3. Results of treatment with 2 different doses of rituximab. NOD/SCIO
`mice given transplants of 10 x 106 Namalwa cells inlraperitoneally were treated with
`75 mg/kg (• )or 25 mg/kg((cid:127)) of riluxlmab. Delay in tumor growth was not significantly
`different in mice given 75 mg/kg of rituximab and those given 25 mg/kg on days 3, 5,
`and 7 (n = 4 per group). The dotted line indicates tumor growth in untreated controls
`(A). Results are mean :t SD values for tumor volume.
`
`tolerable dose of CTX was found to be 7 5 mg/kg per body weight
`given on days 3, 5, and 7. This treatment significantly delayed tumor
`growth, and dose escalation to I 50 mg/kg killed 60% of the treated
`mice while not producing a significantly greater response (Figure
`2). Three courses of25 mg/kg ofrituximab given on days 3, 5, and
`7 were found to delay Namalwa tumor growth, and dose escalation
`(up to 75 mg/kg) did not produce an additional benefit (Figure 3).
`Interestingly, when we evaluated the effect of CTX and rituximab
`on bulky disease by administering these drugs on days 15, 17, and
`19 after transplantation, we found that CTX induced a transient
`reduction in tumor burden, whereas rituximab was not effective
`
`100000
`
`E 10000
`
`1000
`
`100
`
`10
`
`-M
`E -<1)
`
`E
`::1
`0
`>
`'-
`0
`E
`::1
`I-
`
`Rituximab or CTX
`
`Ir
`
`lll ~ ~-1
`I
`".~
`I
`~
`
`I~ (cid:127)
`250 500 750 1000
`0
`Endostatin concentration
`(ng/ml)
`
`E
`
`B -M
`E -Q,)
`E
`::l
`0 > ,._
`0
`E
`::l
`.....
`
`100000
`
`10000
`
`1000
`
`100
`
`10
`
`1
`
`*
`
`*
`
`Endostatin
`
`lllll
`
`0
`
`5
`
`10 15 20 25
`Day.
`
`0
`
`5 10 15 20 25 30 35
`Day
`Figure 4. Treatment of bulky disease with CTX (75 mg/kg) or rituximab (25
`mg/kg). NOD/SCIO mice (n = 4 per treatment group) that received transplants of
`1 O x 106 Namalwa cells intraperiloneally were treated on days 15, 17, and 20 after
`transplantation. CTX ((cid:127) ) induced a significant but transient reduction in tumor
`burden, whereas rituximab ( • ) did not. The dotted line indicates tumor growth in
`untreated controls (.6. ). Results are mean :!: SD values for tumor volume.
`
`Figure 5. Results of in vitro and in vivo studies of endostatin. (A) Specific inhibition of
`human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) ( •) by endoslatin. HUVEC were cullured
`in medium 200 supplemented with 10 ng/ml vascular endothelial growth factor and basic
`fibroblast growth factor. Namalwa ceUs ((cid:127)) were cultured in RPM!~% fetal bovine serum
`in a 72-hour proliferation assay.• Endostatin inhibited proliferation of HUVEC but not
`Namalwa cells in a dose-dependent fashion. Results are mean :t SD values (n = 3). (B)
`Endostatin treatment ( • , 50 µg per mouse on days 3 lo 7) significantly delayed tumor
`growth in NOD/SCIO mice given transplants of 10 x 106 Namalwa cells inlraperiloneally.
`The dotted line indicates tumor growth in untreated controls ((cid:127)). Results are mean :t SD
`values for tumor volume (n = 4 per group). ' P < 0.01.
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2076
`Breckenridge v. Novartis, IPR 2017-01592
`Page 3 of 6
`
`

`

`BLOOD, 1 JULY 2000 • VOLUME 96, NUMBER 1
`
`ENDOSTATIN, CTX, AND RITUXIMAB IN MURINE NHL
`
`285
`
`endostatin effectively induced tumor stabilization. As shown in
`Figure 6, mice given 3 courses ofrituximab on days 3, 5, and 7 after
`transplantation were randomly assigned to receive 50 µg of
`endostatin or PBS on days 15 to 19. In endostatin-treated mice, but
`not in PBS-treated mice, tumor growth was prevented as long as the
`endostatin was administered. Endostatin was similarly effective in
`mice given 3 courses ofCTX on days 3, 5, and 7 after transplanta(cid:173)
`tion and randomly assigned to receive 50 µg of endostatin or PBS
`on days 15 to 19 (Figure 7). It is noteworthy that administration of
`endostatin on days 25 to 29 after tumor regrowth still induced
`significant tumor regression (P = .02 by paired t test; Figure 7).
`Conversely, when rituximab was administered after CTX, it delayed
`tumor growth in comparison with results in PBS-treated controls but did
`not prevent tumor growth or induce a significant tumor regression after
`tumor regrowth (Figure 8). Similarly, when CTX was administered after
`rituximab, tumor growth was delayed in comparison with results in
`PBS-treated controls, but neither prevention of tumor growth nor
`regression after tumor regrowth was observed (Figure 9).
`
`Induction of in vivo endothelial cell apoptosis by endostatin
`
`Figure IO shows the frequency of apoptosis in endothelial cells
`from dissolved Namalwa tumors. As indicated by double staining
`for murine FLK and 7 AAD, 8.3% ± 1.9% of endothelial cells from
`endostatin-treated animals were apoptotic. This value was 4 times
`higher than that in control mice given PBS, CTX, or rituximab
`(1.7% ± 1.1%;P > .001).
`
`Discussion
`
`Studies using preclinical models of nonhematologic malignancies
`have indicated that antiangiogenic therapies may delay or even
`abrogate tumor growth.2•6•8 Moreover, several findings suggest that
`angiogenesis may be clinically relevant in hematopoietic malignan(cid:173)
`cies,3·5 and the antiangiogenic drug thalidomide has been found to
`
`100000
`
`Endostatin or PBS
`
`-
`E -Q)
`
`E
`:::i
`0
`>
`I.,
`0
`E
`::,
`1--
`
`100000
`
`M
`E 10000
`
`Endostatin or PBS
`
`Jilll
`
`• .. .1
`
`1000
`
`100
`
`10
`
`i
`
`CTX
`
`!!!
`
`... i
`
`;✓
`
`I
`
`Endostatin or PBS
`
`0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
`Day
`Figure 7. Results with CTX followed by endostatin. NOD/SC ID mice that received
`transplants of 10 x 106 Namaiwa cells intraperitoneally were given 3 courses of CTX
`(75 mg/kg) on days 3, 5, and 7 after transplantation and randomly assigned to receive
`50 µg of endostatin (•) or PBS((cid:127)) on days 15 to 19. In endostatin-treated mice, but
`not in PBS-treated mice, tumor growth was prevented as long as endostatin was
`administered. Moreover, administration of endostatin on days 25 to 29 after tumor
`regrowth induced significant tumor regression (P = .02 by paired t test comparing
`tumor volume on day 25 with that on day 30). The dotted line indicates tumor growth
`in untreated controls (A). Results are mean :!: SD values for tumor volume (n = 6 per
`group).• P = .02 vs day 25.
`
`be effective in patients with multiple myeloma refractory to
`chemotherapy. 7 Furthermore, thalidomide also seems to be effec(cid:173)
`tive in myelodysplastic syndromes, myeloproliferative disorders,
`and myelofibrosis. 13,14 All these hematologic diseases, including
`myeloma, are associated with relevant bone marrow angiogen(cid:173)
`esis.4•5 We and others 15•18 have investigated the role of angiogenesis
`and angiogenic growth factors in NHL. Expression of VEGF and
`related receptors Flt-I and FLK-KDR has been observed in most
`B-cell hematopoietic malignancies, 17 and the autocrine and
`paracrine roles of this growth factor are being evaluated. In
`addition, remodeling and immature vessels were observed in biopsy
`
`I
`
`· ·-····"'
`
`100000
`
`M
`E 10000
`
`Rituximab or PBS
`
`!!!
`
`E
`:::i
`0
`
`1000
`
`100
`
`10 -
`
`CTX
`
`-
`E -(I)
`.. ~
`> ...
`0
`E
`::I
`1--
`
`-M
`E -Q)
`
`E
`:::J
`0
`>
`I..
`0
`E
`:::J
`I-
`
`E 10000
`
`1000
`
`100
`
`10 -
`
`Rituximab
`
`,,
`
`l.
`II!
`
`! ! !
`, .. ·
`1 •
`
`5
`
`0
`
`10 15 20 25 30
`Day
`Figure 6. Results of treatment with rituximab followed by endostatin. NOD/
`SC ID mice that received transplants of 10 x 106 Namalwa cells intraperitoneally
`were given 3 courses of rituximab (25 mg/kg) on days 3, 5, and 7 alter transplantation
`and randomly assigned to receive 50 µg of endoslatin ( •) or phosphate-buffered
`saline (PBS)((cid:127)) on days 15 to 19. In endostatin-treated mice, but not in PBS-treated
`mice, tumor growth was prevented as long as endostatin was administered. The
`dotted line indicates tumor growth in untreated controls (A). Results are mean :!: SD
`values for tumor volume (n = 4 per group).
`
`0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
`Day
`Figure 8. Results with CTX followed by rituxlmab. NOD/SCIO mice that received
`transplants of 1 O x 106 Namalwa cells intraperitoneally were given 3 courses of CTX
`(75 mg/kg) on days 3, 5, and 7 after transplantation and randomly assigned to receive
`25 mg/kg olrituximab or PBS on days 15, 17, and 19 (first course) and on days 25, 27,
`and 29 (second course). Rituximab (•) delayed tumor growth in comparison with
`results in PBS-treated controls ((cid:127)) but did not prevent tumor growth or induce
`significant tumor regression after tumor regrowth. The dotted line indicates tumor
`growth in untreated controls (.t.). Results are mean :!: SD values for tumor volume
`(n = 4 per group).
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2076
`Breckenridge v. Novartis, IPR 2017-01592
`Page 4 of 6
`
`

`

`286
`
`BERTOLINI et al
`
`BLOOD, 1 JULY 2000 • VOLUM E 96, NUMBER 1
`
`100000
`
`CTX or PBS
`
`E 10000
`
`--('I')
`E -Cl)
`
`E
`:J
`0
`>
`i..
`0
`E
`:J
`I-
`
`J.
`
`Rituximab
`
`!!!
`
`1000
`
`100
`
`10
`
`1
`
`CTX or PBS
`
`iii
`
`0 5 10 15 20 25 30
`Day
`Figure 9. Results with rituximab followed by CTX. NOD/SCIO mice that received
`transplants of 10 x 106 Namalwa cells intraperitoneally were given 3 courses of
`rituximab (25 mg/kg) on days 3, 5, and 7 after transplantation and randomly assigned
`to receive 75 of mg/kg CTX (• ) or PBS((cid:127) ) on days 15, 17, and 19 (first course) and
`on days 25, 27, and 29 (second course). CTX delayed tumor growth in comparison
`with results in PBS-treated controls but did not prevent tumor growth or induce
`significant tumor regression after tumor regrowth. The dotted line indicates tumor
`growth in untreated controls (J. ). Results are mean ± SD values for tumor volume
`(n = 4 per group). •p = .003; tP = .02.
`
`specimens of high-grade NHL (F. Pezzella, unpublished data), and
`high circulating levels ofVEGF and b-FGF (the other endothelial
`cell mitogenic factor) were found to correlate with a poor prognosis
`in patients with NHL. 15•16•18
`When generating animal models of human cancer, it is impor(cid:173)
`tant to consider that tumor angiogenic phenotype can be modulated
`by cytokines released by host cells in specific microenvironments.
`Human renal cancer cells, for instance, express high levels of the
`angiogenic growth factor b-FGF when growing in kidney, but not
`when growing subcutaneously. 19 Thus, we reasoned that an intra(cid:173)
`peritoneal tumor model was more appropriate than a subcutaneous
`model for evaluating the effect of endostatin in B-cell NHL. By using
`NOD/SCID mice given transplants ofNamalwa cells, we generated a
`reliable in vivo model of aggressive intraperitoneal human B-cell
`
`c·~.------c=,.,.--,
`~~ 1,----t,,ti,. -I
`
`,-.. ,....~
`
`~~~-...... 1---;
`
`0
`
`102' 10":I
`10
`Mc,t;se FLK
`
`1114
`
`Control
`
`3.0%
`
`8.8°/o
`
`Endostatin
`
`Figure 10. Representative dot plots indicating the frequency of endothelial cell
`apoptosis in Namalwa tumors generated in NOD/SCID mice. Tumors dissolved
`as single cells were evaluated by flow cytometry. Panel A shows forward and side
`scatters of the cell suspension and the analysis gate, panel B the negative control,
`and panel C the human CD19' phenotype of the tumor. As indicated by the
`percentage of murine cells positive for FLK and 7-amino actinomycin D (panels D and
`E), the frequency of endothelial apoptotic cells was significantly increased in mice
`given endostatin.
`
`NHL that allows measurement of tumor, closely resembles the
`human disease, and has 100% engraftment efficiency. In fact, the
`animal model described in this study was similar to human Burkitt
`NHL, a B-cell malignancy that, in most endemic and sporadic cases,
`affects abdominal viscera. The model had 100% engraftment effi(cid:173)
`ciency: measurable intraperitoneal tumors developed in the injec(cid:173)
`tion site in all mice given transplants. Remarkably, the Namalwa
`line was previously found to be the most aggressive in a panel of
`lymphoid lines tested in subcutaneous xenotransplant studies. JO
`To study the efficacy of endostatin used alone and in combina(cid:173)
`tion with established chemotherapy and immunotherapy protocols
`in our NHL model, we chose drug-administration schedules in
`accordance with previously published inforrnation. 1 When seeking
`the most effective dosages of CTX and rituximab, we found that
`toxicity limited CTX administration and that drug resistance was
`progressively acquired. Rituximab efficiency reached a plateau at a
`dose of 25 mg/kg, and in our model, as well as in NHL patients (F.
`Pezzella et al, unpublished data), this agent was less active than
`CTX in cases of bulky disease. To our knowledge, our study is the
`first to indicate that rituximab is effective in NOD/SCID mouse
`models of human B-cell NHL. The evidence that rituximab was
`active in vivo against human NHL, despite the fact that the host
`mice had a severe deficiency of B cells, T cells, natural killer cells,
`myeloid cells, and complement, 11 is of particular interest. In fact, it
`suggests that at least some ofrituximab-induced biologic responses
`may not be due to antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity or
`complement-dependent cell lysis.
`Endostatin is one of the more promising antiangiogenic drugs, and
`our in vitro data indicate that it has a direct effect on newly generated
`endothelial cells without producing a detectable effect on NHL
`cells. Our study indicates that sequential administration of end(cid:173)
`ostatin after rituximab or CTX effectively induces tumor stabiliza(cid:173)
`tion. It should be noted that in mice treated in the first week after
`tumor transplantation, sequential administration of the nontoxic drugs
`rituximab and endostatin was at least as effective as sequential
`administration of CTX (a highly toxic drug) and endostatin. Our
`data also confirm the results of a study6 in mice treated for 240 to
`320 days with multiple cycles of high-dose endostatin that indi(cid:173)
`cated that this antiangiogenic drug, in sharp contrast to chemother(cid:173)
`apy drugs such as CTX, does not induce acquired drug resistance.
`On the other hand, long-te1m administration of endostatin is needed
`because tumor relapse has been observed after discontinuation of the
`drug. The ultimate goal of antiangiogenic therapy is to induce
`long-term tumor stabilization. 20 Because data from studies in
`nonhuman primates have indicated that endostatin may be adminis(cid:173)
`tered for long periods without producing toxicity,21 we suggest that
`this agent might be evaluated in clinical trials as a consolidation
`drug for patients who have achieved remission. The data we obtained by
`using our murine model indicate that sequential administration of
`chemotherapy and endostatin seems appropriate in patients with
`bulky disease, whereas the less toxic sequential administration of
`rituximab and endostatin seems effective in patients with limited
`disease. In this context, B-cell malignancies are of particular
`interest because molecular probes for quantifying minimal residual
`disease in blood and bone marrow are available for most patients.
`
`Acknowledgments
`
`We thank Francesco Pezzella, Domenico Delia, Caimelo Carlo(cid:173)
`Stella, and Davide Soligo for critical reading of the manuscript.
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2076
`Breckenridge v. Novartis, IPR 2017-01592
`Page 5 of 6
`
`

`

`BLOOD, 1 JULY 2000 • V OLUME 96, NUMBER 1
`
`ENDOSTATIN, CTX, AND RITUXIMAB IN MURINE NHL
`
`287
`
`References
`
`1. Longo DL. Lymphoma treatment: you have to ad-
`mit it's getting better. Curr Opin On col. 1999; 11 :
`319.
`2. Folkman J. Angiogenesis in cancer, vascular, meu-
`matoid and other diseases. Nat Med. 1995; 1 :27.
`3, Perez-Atayde AR, Sallan SE, Tedrow U, Connors
`S, Allred E, Folkman J, Spectrum of tumor angio-
`genesis in the bone marrow of children with acute
`lymphoblastic leukemia.Am'J Pathol. 1997;150:
`815.
`4. Pruneri G, Bertolini F, Soligo D, et al. Angiogen-
`esis in myelodysplastic syndromes. Br J Cancer.
`1999;81:1398.
`5. Vacca A, Ribatti D, Presta M, et al. Bone marrow
`neovascularization, plasma cell angiogenic po-
`tential, and matrix metalloproteinase-2 secretion
`parallel progression of human multiple myeloma.
`Blood. 1999;93:3064.
`6. Bohem T, Folkman J, Browder T, O'Reilly MS.
`Antiangiogenic therapy of experimental cancer
`does not induce acquired drug resistance. Na-
`ture. 1997;390:404.
`7. Singha! S, Mehta J, Desikan R, et al. Antitumor
`activity of thalidomide in refractory multiple my-
`eloma. N Engl J Med. 1999;341 :1565.
`8. O'Reilly MS, Boham T, Shing Y, et al. Endostatin:
`an endogenous inhibitor of angiogenesis and tu-
`mour growth. Cell. 1977;88:277.
`
`9. Bonnet D, Dick JE. Human acute myeloid leuke-
`mia is organized as a hierarchy that originates
`from a primitive hematopoietic cell. Nat Med.
`1997;3:730.
`10. Hudson WA, Li Q, Le C, Kersey JH. Xenotrans-
`plantation of human lymphoid malignancies is
`optimized in mice with multiple immunologic de-
`fects. Leukemia. 1998;12:2029.
`11, Greiner DL, Hesselton RA, Shultz LD. SCIO
`mouse models of human cell engraftment. Stem
`Cells. 1998;16:166.
`12. Philpott NJ, Turner AJC, Scopes J, et al. The use
`of 7-amino actinomycin D in identifying apoptosis:
`simplicity of use and broad spectrum of applica-
`lion compared with other techniques. Blood.
`1996;87:2244.
`13. Thomas DA, Aguayo A, Giles FJ, et al. Thalido-
`mide anti-angiogenesis therapy in Philadelphia-
`negative myeloproliferative disorders and myelo-
`fibrosis [abstract]. Blood. 1999;94:702a.
`14, Raza A, Lisak L, Andrews C, et al. Thalidomide
`produces transfusion independence in patients
`with long-standing refractory anemias and myelo-
`dysplastic syndromes [abstract]. Blood. 1999;94:
`661a.
`15, Bertolini F, Paolucci M, Peccatori F, et al. Angio-
`genie growth factors and endostatin in non-
`
`Hodgkin's lymphoma. BrJ Haematol. 1999;106:
`504.
`16. Salven P, Teerenhovi L, Joensuu H. A high pre-
`treatment serum vascular endothelial growth fac-
`tor concentration is associated with poor outcome
`in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Blood.
`1997;90:3167,
`17. Bellamy WT, Richter L, Frutiger Y, Grogan TM.
`Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor
`and its receptors in hematopoietic malignancies.
`Cancer Res. 1999;59:728.
`18, Salven P, Teerenhovi L, Joensuu H. A high pre-
`treatment serum basic-fibroblast growth factor
`concentration is an independent predictor of poor
`prognosis in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Blood.
`1999;94:3334.
`19, Singh RK, Bucana CD, Gutman M, Fan D, Wilson
`MR, Fidler IJ, Organ-site dependent expression
`of b-FGF in human renal cell carcinoma cells. Am
`J Pathol. 1994;145:365.
`20. Harris AL. Antiangiogenesis for cancer therapy.
`Lancet 1997;349(suppl 11):13.
`21. Fortier AH , Fogler WE, Tomszewski JE, et al. Re-
`combinant human endostatin protein in cynomol-
`gus monkey produces no toxicological effects fol-
`lowing iv administration for 28 consecutive days
`[abstract]. Clin Cancer Res. 1999;5:3813s.
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2076
`Breckenridge v. Novartis, IPR 2017-01592
`Page 6 of 6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket