throbber
Multi-Institutional Study of the Angiogenesis Inhibitor
`TNP-470 in Metastatic Renal Carcinoma
`
`By Walter M. Stadler, Timothy Kuzel, Charles Shapiro, Jeffery Sosman, Joseph Clark, and Nicholas J. Vogelzang
`
`Purpose: Renal cell carcinoma is resistant to most
`chemotherapy, and only a minority of patients respond
`to immunotherapy. Its highly vascular nature suggests
`that antiangiogenesis therapy might be useful. We thus
`performed a phase II study of the fumigillin analog
`TNP-470 in previously treated patients with metastatic
`renal cell carcinoma.
`Patients and Methods: Metastatic renal cell carci-
`noma patients with good organ function were entered
`onto the study through five separate institutions. There
`were no exclusion criteria for prior therapy. All patients
`were treated at a dose of 60 mg/m2 of TNP-470 infused
`over 1 hour three times per week.
`Results: Thirty-three patients were enrolled. Therapy
`was generally well tolerated, but asthenia, fatigue,
`vertigo, dizziness, sense of imbalance, and loss of con-
`
`TREATMENT OF METASTATIC renal cell carcinoma
`
`is woefully inadequate, and approximately 11,900
`Americans will die of disease in 1999.1 Although immuno-
`therapy with interleukin-2 (IL-2), interferon alfa (IFNa), or
`both is considered standard, only 15% of individuals experi-
`ence an objective response and only 5% experience a
`complete response.2-5 Renal cell cancer is also resistant to
`most chemotherapeutic agents, in part due to overexpression
`of various multidrug resistance proteins.6,7 Novel ap-
`proaches to this disease are thus needed. Because of the
`vascular nature of renal tumors, an antiangiogenesis ap-
`proach is attractive. Furthermore, experimental studies have
`suggested that such an approach may circumvent the devel-
`opment of drug resistance.8
`One of the first antiangiogenesis compounds to undergo
`clinical testing is the fumigillin analog TNP-470. Fumigillin
`was originally isolated from Aspergillus fumigatus contami-
`nating endothelial cell cultures.9 Subsequent studies re-
`vealed that fumigillin was a potent inhibitor of endothelial
`growth in vitro as well as in vivo, but that administration to
`animals led to profound weight loss.9 A number of analogs
`were then synthesized, and TNP-470 was selected as the
`least
`toxic compound with the greatest antiangiogenic
`activity.9,10 TNP-470 inhibits in vitro endothelial cell prolif-
`eration,
`including growth stimulated by basic fibroblast
`growth factor (bFGF).9-11 Additionally, it inhibits angiogen-
`esis in the chorioallantoic membrane and rat corneal as-
`says.9-11 It can also inhibit tumor growth and metastases in a
`number of rodent tumor model systems, including a rodent
`renal cell carcinoma.9,10,12-14
`
`centration were common and severe enough to lead to
`therapy discontinuation in five patients. There was only
`one partial response of short duration (response rate,
`3%, 95% confidence interval, 0% to 16%), but six
`patients (18%) remained on study for 6 or more months
`without toxicity or disease progression.
`Conclusion: Long-term therapy with TNP-470 has
`manageable toxicities and is feasible in patients with
`metastatic renal cell carcinoma but does not lead to any
`significant objective responses. Further studies in this
`population using TNP-470 schedules that produce more
`prolonged drug levels and clinical trial end points other
`than objective tumor regression may be indicated.
`J Clin Oncol 17:2541-2545. r 1999 by American
`SocietyofClinicalOncology.
`
`Animal studies have revealed that the highest doses lead
`to myelosuppression, microhemorrhages in various organs,
`and neurotoxicity consisting of seizures, tremors, and ataxia.15
`Phase I studies in humans have revealed reversible neurotox-
`icity as the major dose-limiting toxicity. These consisted of
`fatigue/asthenia, weakness, nystagmus, diplopia, vertigo,
`dysmetria, and truncal ataxia.16-18 Hemorrhage into a CNS
`lymphoma and into a cytomegalovirus retinitis lesion was
`also observed in AIDS patients with Kaposi’s sarcoma.16
`One patient with biopsy-proven metastatic cervical carci-
`noma on a phase I study experienced a complete and
`long-lasting response in her lung lesions.17
`We initiated a phase II study of TNP-470 in patients with
`refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma using a three times
`weekly bolus infusion. We confirm previous observations of
`asthenia and cerebellar toxicities as the most significant
`adverse events. We also report one partial response and
`several patients with prolonged freedom from progression
`and suggest that this compound may be worthy of further
`study in this population.
`
`From the University of Chicago, Northwestern University, and
`Loyola University of Illinois, Chicago; Loyola University Medical
`Center, Maywood, IL; and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
`Submitted November 4, 1998; accepted March 18, 1999.
`Supported in part by TAP Pharmaceuticals.
`Address reprint requests to Walter M. Stadler, MD, University of
`Chicago, Section Hematology-Oncology, 5841 S Maryland, MC2115,
`Chicago, IL 60637; email wmstadle@mcis.bsd.uchicago.edu.
`r 1999 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
`0732-183X/99/1708-2541
`
`JournalofClinicalOncology, Vol 17, No 8 (August), 1999: pp 2541-2545
`
`2541
`
`Downloaded from ascopubs.org by Reprints Desk on February 23, 2018 from 072.037.250.188
`
`Copyright © 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology. All rights reserved.
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2073
`Breckenridge v. Novartis, IPR 2017-01592
`Page 1 of 5
`
`

`

`2542
`
`Patients
`
`PATIENTS AND METHODS
`
`Patients were required to have recurrent or inoperable renal cell
`carcinoma, a World Health Organization performance status of 0 to 2,
`and no history of other invasive cancers in the previous 5 years. There
`were no exclusions for prior therapy, but at least 3 weeks had to have
`elapsed since the last dose of the prior drug (6 weeks for nitrosoureas
`and 4 weeks for any investigational agent). At least 4 weeks had to have
`elapsed since any prior surgery or radiotherapy, and any previously
`irradiated lesions could not be used for response evaluation. Patients
`were required to have adequate organ function defined by serum
`creatinine # 2.0 mg/dL; total bilirubin, ALT, and alkaline phosphatase #
`2 times the upper limit of normal; hemoglobin $ 9.0 g/dL; platelet
`count greater than 100,000/µL; WBC count greater than 3,000/µL; and
`absolute neutrophil count greater than 1,500/µL. In addition, patients
`were required to have a normal prothrombin time and partial thrombo-
`plastin time, no history of bleeding diathesis, and could not receive
`concomitant anticoagulation except for maintenance of central-line
`patency. Finally, all patients provided written informed consent before
`participating. Thirty-three patients were enrolled between January and
`June 1997 at five separate institutions: University of Chicago, Chicago,
`IL (eight patients); Northwestern University, Chicago, IL (nine pa-
`tients); Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA (nine patients);
`University of Illinois, Chicago, IL (six patients), and Loyola University,
`Chicago, IL (one patient).
`
`Therapy and Dose Modifications
`
`TNP-470 (60 mg/m2) was administered by intravenous infusion over
`1 hour three times per week. The first week of therapy was administered
`in the outpatient area of the parent institution. If no significant toxicities
`were encountered, subsequent infusions could be administered at the
`patient’s home with the use of a home nursing service. Any grade 3 or 4
`toxicity led to therapy discontinuation until toxicity resolved to patient’s
`baseline or # grade 1. Therapy could then be reinitiated at a dose of 45
`mg/m2 three times per week. Recurrent grade 3 or 4 toxicity required
`therapy discontinuation.
`
`Patient Follow-up and Study End Points
`
`The primary end points for this study were objective tumor response
`rate and toxicity assessment. Response evaluations were performed
`after an initial 12 weeks of therapy and every 8 weeks thereafter.
`Toxicity evaluations were performed every 2 weeks for the first 8 weeks
`and then every 4 weeks thereafter. Interim evaluations were performed
`in patients who experienced clinical signs or symptoms of toxicity or
`disease. Partial response was defined as a 50% or greater decrease in the
`sum of the products of diameters of all measurable lesions persisting for
`at least 4 weeks without the development of any new lesions. Complete
`response was defined as disappearance of evidence of tumor persisting
`for at least 4 weeks. Progressive disease was defined as a 25% or greater
`increase in the sum of the products of diameters of all measurable
`lesions or the appearance of any new lesion. All other situations were
`defined as stable disease. Toxicity grading was by the National Cancer
`Institute common toxicity criteria.
`
`Statistical Considerations
`
`Patient accrual was performed with a two-step mechanism. An initial
`19 patients were accrued, with at least one response needing to be
`observed to proceed to the second accrual stage. The null hypothesis to
`be tested in the first stage was that the response rate was 15% or greater.
`
`STADLER ET AL
`
`If no patients responded then the null hypothesis could be rejected with
`a confidence of greater than 95%. The second stage was designed to
`accrue a cumulative total of 30 patients such that the SE on the response
`rate would be # 0.09. To maintain simultaneous commitments made to
`patients at the various participating institutions, the total accrual was 33
`patients. All patients were deemed assessable for response, survival, and
`toxicity. Event-free survival was defined as the time from the start of
`therapy until discontinuation as a result of either progressive disease or
`a toxic event. Overall survival was defined as the time from the start of
`therapy until death. All survival estimates were censured as of August 1,
`1998, and calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
`
`RESULTS
`Table 1 depicts baseline characteristics of all patients.
`Because there was no exclusion criteria for prior therapy, a
`heavily pretreated group was enrolled. In fact, 30 (91%) of
`33 patients had received at least one prior therapy, and in all
`cases this included IL-2 and/or IFNa. Twenty-seven percent of
`patients also underwent prior chemotherapy, usually in the
`
`Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of All Enrolled Patients
`
`Characteristic
`
`No. of Patients
`
`Total enrolled
`Sex (M/F)
`Age, years
`Median
`Range
`Performance status (World Health Organization)
`0
`1
`2
`Number of metastatic sites
`1
`2
`$ 3
`Sites of metastatic disease
`Lung only
`Lymph node only
`Liver (with or without other sites)
`Bone (with or without other sites)
`Prior nephrectomy
`Interval, nephrectomy to therapy, months
`Median
`Range
`Interval, metastatic disease diagnosis to therapy, months
`Median
`Range
`Prior therapy for metastatic disease
`Immunotherapy
`Chemotherapy
`Radiation
`Surgery
`Other
`Number of prior regimens
`Median
`Range
`
`33
`25/8
`
`58
`40-81
`
`11
`17
`5
`
`7
`16
`10
`
`4
`1
`6
`10
`24
`
`30
`8
`10
`3
`4
`
`41
`7-277
`
`14
`2-84
`
`2
`0-7
`
`NOTE. Metastatic sites are defined as the number of organs involved.
`Multiple enlarged lymph nodes were still considered one site of disease.
`
`Downloaded from ascopubs.org by Reprints Desk on February 23, 2018 from 072.037.250.188
`
`Copyright © 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology. All rights reserved.
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2073
`Breckenridge v. Novartis, IPR 2017-01592
`Page 2 of 5
`
`

`

`TNP-470 IN METASTATIC RENAL CARCINOMA
`
`context of a clinical trial. This selection bias favored the accrual
`of patients with indolent disease, and the median interval from
`diagnosis of metastatic disease to study initiation was 14 months.
`The median interval between nephrectomy, in those patients who
`underwent this procedure, and study initiation was even longer at
`41 months. Nevertheless, patients had a significant disease
`burden and 30% had three or more metastatic sites. In addition,
`only 33% of patients had no disease symptoms and a normal
`performance status.
`The primary study end point was response rate. There was
`one response among the first 19 patients, and, therefore, the
`study proceeded to the second stage, in which no additional
`responses were observed. The overall response rate was thus
`3% (95% confidence interval, 0% to 16%). The lone
`responder had a 1.4 3 1.4 cm paratracheal lymph node and
`two approximately 1.0-cm lung nodules, which regressed at
`the initial 12-week evaluation. He was, however, removed
`from the study at that time due to the development of
`asthenia and neurocortical toxicity and subsequently pro-
`gressed and died 8 months after study discontinuation as a
`result of progressive metastatic renal cancer. Figure 1
`depicts event-free survival, with events being defined as
`progressive disease or toxicity requiring study discontinua-
`tion. The median event-free survival was 12 weeks (Fig 1).
`Six patients (18%) remained on study without toxicity or
`progressive disease for 6 months or more. Five of these six
`patients had progressive disease on prior therapy, and one
`had recurrent disease after adjuvant IFNa therapy. As of this
`report, three patients remain on study at 591, 601, and 721
`weeks. Reasons for therapy discontinuation were progres-
`sive disease in 20 patients, drug toxicity in five, and
`intercurrent event (for which relatedness to drug therapy
`could not be definitively determined) in five. These latter
`events included a gastrointestinal hemorrhage on day 3 of
`therapy, depression and suicidal ideation on day 3, hypercal-
`cemia and increasing back pain during week 4, a line
`infection during week 19, and a pulmonary embolism during
`week 47. At a median follow-up of 14 months, the median
`survival is 56 weeks (Fig 1).
`Table 2 depicts observed toxicities that were interpreted to
`have some possible relation to the study drug by each
`investigator. Therapy, was, in general, well tolerated, al-
`though neurocortical toxicities were common. These symp-
`toms were not usually associated with objective neurologic
`findings. Because no formal neuropsychiatric tests were
`performed, they were conveniently categorized as cerebellar
`symptoms, confusion, and other psychiatric symptoms. In
`total, 67% of patients experienced at least one of these
`toxicities. Although these toxicities were usually mild, in
`five patients they were considered severe and led to drug
`discontinuation. Fatigue and asthenia were also common
`
`A 1.0
`
`0.8
`
`0.6
`
`ro >
`·:,;;
`:::,
`(f)
`Q)
`[I'
`LL
`c 0.4
`Q) > w
`
`0.2
`
`0.0
`
`B 1.0
`
`0.8
`
`ro > 0.6
`2' :::,
`
`(f)
`~
`Q) 0.4
`>
`0
`
`0.2
`
`0.0
`
`0
`
`2543
`
`20
`
`40
`
`60
`
`80
`
`Time (weeks)
`
`20
`
`40
`
`60
`
`80
`
`Time (weeks)
`
`(A) Event-free and (B) overall survival for all enrolled patients. Tick
`Fig 1.
`marks represent censured patients. Events included progressive disease and
`toxicity necessitating discontinuation of therapy.
`
`and occurred in 60% of patients. Because therapy was
`administered three times per week, and because there was
`poor documentation in the clinical notes, it was difficult to
`discern whether the fatigue was worse on the treatment days.
`However, patients did not seem to become tolerant to these
`effects, nor did there seem to be a cumulative effect, as is
`seen with prolonged IFN-a or IL-2 therapy. All fatigue and
`neurocortical symptoms resolved rapidly after TNP-470 was
`discontinued.
`Other severe toxicities included pain, pulmonary embo-
`lism and gastrointestinal hemorrhage (as noted previously),
`and hypotension. The treating physician interpreted the first
`three events to be most likely disease-related, but contribu-
`tion from TNP-470 could not be ruled out. The hypotension
`event was correlated with drug infusion and persisted during
`treatment and was thus considered probably drug-related.
`Five patients underwent a protocol-defined dose reduction
`from 60 to 45 mg/m2 due to neurologic toxicities.
`
`Downloaded from ascopubs.org by Reprints Desk on February 23, 2018 from 072.037.250.188
`
`Copyright © 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology. All rights reserved.
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2073
`Breckenridge v. Novartis, IPR 2017-01592
`Page 3 of 5
`
`

`

`2544
`
`Table 2. Total Number of Patients Who Experienced an Adverse Event
`Interpreted by Investigator to Have Some Relation to the Study Drug
`
`Toxicity
`
`Grade 1
`
`Grade 2
`
`Grade 3
`
`Grade 4
`
`Cerebellar symptoms*
`Confusion
`Other psychiatric†
`Fatigue/asthenia
`Pain‡
`Fever/chills
`Anorexia
`Nausea/vomiting
`Other§
`
`21
`8
`15
`9
`16
`7
`8
`11
`0
`
`8
`2
`5
`7
`4
`0
`4
`1
`0
`
`4
`0
`1
`2
`1
`0
`0
`0
`2
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`1
`
`NOTE. A large number of unusual toxicities were described in various ways
`by individual investigators. Several have been grouped as symptom complexes.
`Some patients had more than one toxic event recorded. See Results for
`percentage of patients experiencing selected toxicities.
`*Abnormal gait, ataxia, dizziness, incoordination, tremor, and vertigo.
`†Abnormal dreams, anxiety, depression, emotional lability, insomnia, ner-
`vousness, and somnolence.
`‡Abdominal pain, back pain, chest pain, flank pain, headache, pelvic pain,
`and pain not otherwise specified.
`§Gastrointestinal hemorrhage (grade 4), pulmonary embolism, hypotension.
`
`DISCUSSION
`We have demonstrated that TNP-470, when administered
`to a group of heavily pretreated patients with metastatic
`renal cell carcinoma, is well tolerated, even when adminis-
`tered for prolonged time periods. TNP-470 administration,
`however, does not lead to significant objective responses;
`thus this trial did not meet
`its primary objective, and
`TNP-470 must be considered ineffective per the original trial
`design. Based on animal data, it has been hypothesized that
`TNP-470 may only prevent further tumor growth and not
`necessarily lead to tumor shrinkage.12-14 Whether the pro-
`longed median survival and prolonged progression-free
`survival in several patients was due to TNP-470 or simply a
`reflection of these patients’ natural disease history cannot be
`determined by this study.
`
`STADLER ET AL
`
`TNP-470 has now been evaluated in several clinical
`trials.16-18 Our study supports observations in previous
`studies of low response rate and good general tolerability,
`but asthenia and neurocortical toxicity are dose-limiting.
`Nevertheless, our observations suggest that further studies
`with TNP-470 may be indicated. Such studies should seek to
`specifically answer the question of whether TNP-470 truly
`delays progression and may be best performed in the
`minimal disease or adjuvant setting.9,12 Future trials should
`also include more formal neuropsychiatric evaluations to
`better delineate the neurocortical
`toxicities and perhaps
`identify patients who are particularly vulnerable to such
`difficulties. Combination studies of TNP-470 and other
`known or putative angiogenesis inhibitors may also be
`indicated. A potentially attractive candidate for metastatic
`renal cell carcinoma is IFNa, which has both antiangiogen-
`esis and direct antitumor properties.19
`Before such studies commence, it is likely that a more
`convenient formulation for TNP-470 will need to be devel-
`oped. Animal studies suggest that prolonged exposure to
`TNP-470 may be necessary to fully realize all of its
`antiangiogenic properties. Pharmacokinetic studies, how-
`ever, have shown that the half-life of TNP-470 and its active
`metabolite are only 2 and 6 minutes, respectively (M.
`Dordal, personal communication, September 1998).16,18,20,21
`Ongoing studies should determine the feasibility and toxic-
`ity of more prolonged exposure to TNP-470.
`In conclusion, TNP-470 is one of the first specific
`antiangiogenesis drugs to undergo wide clinical evaluation.
`Our study shows that prolonged therapy with TNP-470 is
`feasible and tolerable in patients with metastatic renal cell
`cancer but does not lead to an appreciable objective response
`rate. Additional studies with formulations or schedules that
`give more prolonged TNP-470 exposure to determine its
`effect on tumor progression in renal cell carcinoma may be
`indicated.
`
`REFERENCES
`6. Chapman AE, Goldstein LJ: Multiple drug resistance: Biologic
`1. Landis SH, Murray T, Bolden S, et al: Cancer Statistics, 1999. CA
`basis and clinical significance in renal cell carcinoma. Semin Oncol
`Cancer J Clin 49:8-31, 1999
`22:17-28, 1995
`2. Stadler WM, Vogelzang NJ: Low dose interleukin-2 in the treatment of
`7. Kim WJ, Kakehi Y, Kinoshita H, et al: Expression patterns of
`metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Semin Oncol 22:67-73, 1995
`multidrug-resistance (MDR1), multidrug resistance-associated protein
`3. Hawkins MJ: Immunotherapy with high-dose interleukin 2, in
`(MRP), glutathione-S-transferase-pi (GST-pi) and DNA topoisomerase
`Vogelzang NJ, Scardino PT, Shipley WU, et al (eds): Comprehensive
`II (Topo II) genes in renal cell carcinomas and normal kidney. J Urol
`Textbook of Genitourinary Oncology. Baltimore, MD, Williams and
`156:506-511, 1996
`Wilkins, 1996, pp 242-247
`8. Boehm T, Folkman J, Browder T, et al: Antiangiogenic therapy of
`4. Minasian LM, Motzer RJ, Gluck L, et al: Interferon alfa-2a in
`experimental cancer does not induce acquired drug resistance. Nature
`advanced renal cell carcinoma: Treatment results and survival in 159
`390:404-407, 1997
`patients with long-term follow-up. J Clin Oncol 11:1368-1375, 1993
`9. Ingber D, Fujita T, Kishimoto S, et al: Synthetic analogues of
`5. Negrier S, Escudier B, Lasset C, et al: Recombinant human
`fumagillin that
`inhibit angiogenesis and suppress tumour growth.
`interleukin-2, recombinant human interferon alfa-2a, or both in meta-
`Nature 348:555-557, 1990
`static renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 338:1272-1278, 1998
`
`Downloaded from ascopubs.org by Reprints Desk on February 23, 2018 from 072.037.250.188
`
`Copyright © 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology. All rights reserved.
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2073
`Breckenridge v. Novartis, IPR 2017-01592
`Page 4 of 5
`
`

`

`TNP-470 IN METASTATIC RENAL CARCINOMA
`
`10. Kusaka M, Sudo K, Fujita T, et al: Potent anti-angiogenic action
`of AGM-1470: Comparison to the fumagillin parent. Biochem Biophys
`Res Commun 174:1070-1076, 1991
`11. Kusaka M, Sudo K, Matsutani E, et al: Cytostatic inhibition of
`endothelial cell growth by the angiogenesis inhibitor TNP-470 (AGM-
`1470). Br J Cancer 69:212-216, 1994
`12. Yanase T, Tamura M, Fujita K, et al: Inhibitory effect of
`angiogenesis inhibitor TNP-470 on tumor growth and metastasis of
`human cell lines in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Res 53:2566-2570, 1993
`13. Fujioka T, Hasegawa M, Ogiu K, et al: Antitumor effects of
`angiogenesis inhibitor 0-(chloroacetyl-carbamoyl) fumagillol (TNP-
`470) against murine renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 155:1775-1778, 1996
`14. Morita T, Shinohara N, Tokue A: Antitumour effect of a synthetic
`analogue of fumagillin on murine renal carcinoma. Br J Urol 74:416-
`421, 1994
`15. TNP-470: Information for Clinical Investigators. TAP Holdings,
`July, 1996
`16. Dezube BJ, Von Roenn JH, Holden-Wiltse J, et al: Fumagillin
`analog in the treatment of Kaposi’s sarcoma: A phase I AIDS Clinical
`
`2545
`
`Trial Group study—AIDS Clinical Trial Group No. 215 Team. J Clin
`Oncol 16:1444-1449, 1998
`17. Kudelka AP, Levy T, Verschraegen CF, et al: A phase I study of
`TNP-470 administered to patients with advanced squamous cell cancer
`of the cervix. Clin Cancer Res 3:1501-1505, 1997
`18. Bhargava P, Marshall J, Rizvi N, et al: A study of TNP-470 in
`patients with advanced cancer. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 38:1489,
`1997 (abstr)
`19. Dinney CP, Bielenberg DR, Perrotte P, et al: Inhibition of basic
`fibroblast growth factor expression, angiogenesis, and growth of human
`bladder carcinoma in mice by factor expression, angiogenesis, and
`growth of human bladder carcinoma in mice by systemic interferon-
`alpha administration. Cancer Res 58:808-814, 1998
`20. Cretton-Scott E, Placidi L, McClure H, et al: Pharmacokinetics
`and metabolism of O-(chloroacetyl-carbamoyl) fumagillol (TNP-470,
`AGM-1470) in rhesus monkeys. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 38:117-
`122, 1996
`21. Figg WD, Pluda JM, Lush RM, et al: The pharmacokinetics of
`TNP-470, a new angiogenesis inhibitor. Pharmacotherapy 17:91-97,
`1997
`
`Downloaded from ascopubs.org by Reprints Desk on February 23, 2018 from 072.037.250.188
`
`Copyright © 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology. All rights reserved.
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2073
`Breckenridge v. Novartis, IPR 2017-01592
`Page 5 of 5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket