throbber
letters to nature
`
`locus. In agreement, the wing phenotypes (thickened veins and
`wing-edge loss) of Nnd-3 mutants are completely suppressed by pk-
`sple13 (data not shown). The inhibitory effect of Sple provides a
`second mechanism for polarizing Notch signalling in R3/R4 that
`could be coordinated by Fz/Dsh (Fig. 4d).
`In conclusion, Notch signalling is activated in R3/R4 in response
`to Fz/Dsh and we propose that Fz/Dsh sets up an initial bias in
`Notch activity between R3 and R4 by promoting Dl activity and
`inhibiting Notch via Sple in a coordinated manner. Feedback in the
`Notch pathway ampli®es this bias so that even a subtle variation in
`the amount of signal received by Fz in the equatorial (pre-R3) and
`polar (pre-R4) cells in each ommatidium would generate distinct
`cell fates. This explains how a signal from the equator could be
`interpreted by the whole ®eld of ommatidia (Fig. 4e) and is likely to
`be of widespread signi®cance in the development of polarized
`structures within planar epithelia. The asymmetrical expression of
`Notch-pathway genes detected in feather primordia is consistent
`with this model24. Furthermore, this mechanism for the coordinated
`regulation of Notch signalling can also explain how neural precursors
`develop at speci®c positions within competent proneural ®elds. M
`. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
`
`Methods
`Fly strains. Alleles used were: Nts1, Nnd-3, dsh1, fzR54, Dlrf , Dl6B; sple1 and
`pk-sple13. For analysis of E(spl) a combination between Df(3R)NF1P1 (removing
`NF1, E(spl)md and E(spl)mg promoter25; M.T.D.C. and S.J.B., unpublished
`data) and Df(3R)E(spl)grob32.2 (removing all E(spl) genes and NF1) was used.
`Rescue of NF1 activity25 did not modify the eye phenotypes and no defects were
`observed in NF1P2/Df(3R)NF1P1, which eliminates NF1 only25. For mis-expression
`studies we used heat-shock-inducible, intracellular Notch (hs-Nicd; ref. 15), a
`transmembrane-activated Notch derivative driven by sevenless
`enhancer
`(sevE-NDecd; ref. 17), and the Gal4/UAS-targeted expression system26. UAS lines
`were: UAS-Nicd (gift of M. Haenlin), UAS-Ndn (ECN, containing Notch extra-
`cellular and transmembrane domains16), UAS-dsh19, UAS-E(spl)md and UAS-
`E(spl)mb. These were combined with sev-Gal4 (expressed in R3, R4, R7, mystery
`and cone cells) and/or spalt-Gal4 (expressed in R3, R4 and cone cells).
`For Nts experiments, larvae were incubated at 30 8C for 6 h, returned to 25 8C for
`10 h or until eclosion. Nicd expression was induced in hs-Nicd larvae by 2 h at 37 8C.
`md0.5 transgenic lines. A 487-bp fragment from the 1.9-kb genomic HindIII
`fragment upstream of E(spl)md was ampli®ed using the primers GATCTA-
`GATGCCATCAGATGTCAGC and CTACTAGTCTTTTGGCGCACAGTCAC,
`digested with SpeI (®lled in) and XbaI, and ligated into Asp 718 (®lled in) and
`XbaI sites of HZ50PL. Transgenic lines were established by injection in cn;ry ¯ies
`using standard procedures and all lines gave identical patterns of expression.
`Immuno¯uorescence. the following antibodies were used: rabbit anti-b-
`galactosidase (Cappell), rabbit anti-Bar27, guinea-pig anti-Coracle28, rat anti-
`Elav (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank), rat anti-Spalt (a gift of
`R. Barrio) and mouse monoclonal antibodies against b-galactosidase (Pro-
`mega), E(spl) proteins29, Rough30 and Delta20.
`
`Received 26 October; accepted 18 December 1998.
`
`1. Tomlinson, A. Cellular interactions in the developing eye. Development 104, 183±193 (1988).
`2. Wolff, T. & Ready, D. F. in The Development of Drosophila melanogaster (eds Bate, M. & Martinez-
`Arias, A.) 1277±1325 (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, 1993).
`3. Zheng, L., Zhang, J. & Carthew, R. W. frizzled regulates mirror-symmetric pattern formation in the
`Drosophila eye. Development 121, 3045±3055 (1995).
`4. Fanto, M., Mayes, C. A. & Mlodzik, M. Linking cell-fate speci®cation to planar polarity: determina-
`tion of the R3/R4 photoreceptors is a prerequisite for the interpretation of the Frizzled. Mech. Dev. 74,
`51±58 (1998).
`5. Wolff, T. & Rubin, G. M. strabismus, a novel gene that regulates tissue polarity and cell fate decisions in
`Drosophila. Development 125, 1149±1159 (1998).
`6. Theisen, H. et al. dishevelled is required during wingless signaling to establish both cell polarity and cell
`identity. Development 120, 347±360 (1994).
`7. Krasnow, R. E., Wong, L. L. & Adler, P. N. dishevelled is a component of the frizzled signaling pathway
`in Drosophila. Development 121, 4095±4102 (1995).
`8. Strutt, D. I., Weber, U. & Mlodzick, M. The role of RhoA in tissue polarity and Frizzled signalling.
`Nature 387, 292±295 (1997).
`9. Boutros, M., Paricio, N., Strutt, D. I. & Mlodzik, M. Dishevelled activates JNK and discriminates
`between JNK pathways in planar polarity and wingless signaling. Cell 94, 109±118 (1998).
`10. Wehrli, M. & Tomlinson, A. Independent regulation of anterior/posterior and equatorial/polar
`polarity in the Drosophila eye; evidence for the involvement of Wnt signaling in the equatorial/polar
`axis. Development 125, 1421±1432 (1998).
`11. de Celis, J. F. et al. Functional relationships between Notch, Su(H) and the bHLH genes of the E(spl)
`complex: the E(spl) genes mediate only a subset of Notch activities during imaginal development.
`Development 122, 2719±2728 (1996).
`
`12. Eastman, D. S. et al. Synergy between suppressor of Hairless and Notch in the regulation of Enhancer of
`split mg and md expression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 5620±5628 (1997).
`13. Cagan, R. L. & Ready, D. F. Notch is required for successive cell decisions in the developing Drosophila
`retina. Genes Dev. 3, 1099±1112 (1989).
`14. Baker, N. E., Sung, Y. & Han, D. Evolution of proneural atonal expression during distinct regulatory
`phases in the developing Drosophila eye. Curr. Biol. 6, 1290±1301 (1996).
`15. Struhl, G., Fitzgerald, K. & Greenwald, I. Intrinsic activity of the Lin-12 and Notch intracellular
`domains in vivo. Cell 74, 331±345 (1993).
`16. Klein, T., Brennan, K. & Arias, A. M. An intrinsic dominant negative activity of serrate that is
`modulated during wing development in Drosophila. Dev. Biol. 189, 123±134 (1997).
`17. Fortini, M. E., Rebay, I., Caron, L. A. & Artavanis-Tsakonas, S. An activated Notch receptor blocks cell-
`fate commitment in the developing Drosophila eye. Nature 365, 555±557 (1993).
`18. Fischer-Vize, J. A., Vize, P. D. & Rubin, G. M. A unique mutation in the Enhancer of split gene complex
`affects the fates of the mystery cells in the developing Drosophila eye. Development 115, 89±101 (1992).
`19. Axelrod, J. D., Matsuno, K., Artavanis-Tasakonas, S. & Perrimon, N. Interaction between Wingless
`and Notch signaling pathways mediated by Dishevelled. Science 271, 1826±1832 (1996).
`20. Parks, A. L., Turner, F. R. & Muskavitch, M. A. T. Relationships between complex Delta expression and
`the speci®cation of retinal cell fates during Drosophila eye development. Mech. Dev. 50, 201±216
`(1995).
`21. Greenwald, I. LIN-12/Notch signaling: lessons from worms and ¯ies. Genes Dev. 12, 1751±1762
`(1998).
`22. Choi, K. W., Mozer, B. & Benzer, S. Independent determination of symmetry and polarity in the
`Drosophila eye. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 5737±5741 (1996).
`23. Gubb, D. Cellular polarity, mitotic synchrony and axes of symmetry during growth. Where does the
`information come from? Int. J. Dev. Biol. 42, 369±377 (1998).
`24. Chen, C.-W. J., Jung, H.-S., Jiang, T.-X. & Chuong, C.-M. Asymmetric expression of Notch/Delta/
`Serrate is associated with the anterior-posterior axis of feather buds. Dev. Biol. 188, 181±187 (1997).
`25. The, I. et al. Rescue of a Drosophila NFl mutant phenotype by Protein Kinase A. Science 276, 791±794
`(1997).
`26. Brand, A. H. & Perrimon, N. Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating
`dominant phenotypes. Development 118, 401±415 (1993).
`27. Higashijima, S. et al. Dual Bar homeo box genes of Drosophila required in two photoreceptor cells, R1
`and R6, and primary pigment cells for normal eye development. Genes Dev. 6, 50±60 (1992).
`28. Fehon, R. G., Dawson, I. A. & Artavanis-Tsakonas, S. A Drosophila homolog of membrane skeleton
`protein-4.1 is associated with septate junctions and is encoded by the coracle gene. Development 120,
`545±547 (1994).
`29. Jennings, B., Preiss, A., Delidakis, C. & Bray, S. The Notch signalling pathway is required for Enhancer
`of split bHLH protein expression during neurogenesis in the Drosophila embryo. Development 120,
`3537±3548 (1994).
`30. Kimmel, B. E., Heberlein, U. & Rubin, G. M. The homeodomain protein Rough is expressed in a
`subset of cells in the developing Drosophila eye where it can specify photoreceptor subtype. Genes Dev.
`4, 712±727 (1990).
`
`Acknowledgements. We thank R. Barrio, J. de Celis, M. Dominguez, D. Gubb and M. Haenlin for
`reagents; M. Dominguez for valuable advice; the multi-imaging center for technical assistance, and
`N. Brown, K. Moses and M. Freeman for comments on the manuscript. This research was supported by a
`Project Grant from the MRC and M.T.D.C. was funded by an MRC studentship.
`
`Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to S.J.B. (sjb32@mole.bio.cam.ac.uk).
`
`Cyclosporine induces
`cancer progression by a
`cell-autonomous mechanism
`Minoru Hojo*², Takashi Morimoto³, Mary Maluccio*,
`Tomohiko Asano§, Kengo Morimoto², Milagros Lagman*,
`Toshikazu Shimbo² & Manikkam Suthanthiran*
`
`* Department of Transplantation Medicine and Extracorporeal Therapy, Division
`of Nephrology, and Departments of Medicine and Surgery, Weill Medical College
`of Cornell University, 525 East 68th Street, New York, New York 10021, USA
`² Department of Pediatrics, Mizonokuchi Hospital, Teikyo University School of
`Medicine, 3-8-3 Mizonokuchi, Takatsu-ku, Kawasaki 213, Japan
`³ Department of Cell Biology, New York University School of Medicine,
`550 First Avenue, New York, New York 10016, USA
`§ Department of Urology, National Defense Medical College, 3-2 Namiki,
`Tokorozawa, Saitama 359, Japan
`. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
`Malignancy is a common and dreaded complication following
`organ transplantation1±4. The high incidence of neoplasm and its
`aggressive progression, which are associated with immunosup-
`pressive therapy, are thought to be due to the resulting impair-
`ment of the organ recipient's immune-surveillance system5±9.
`Here we report a mechanism for the heightened malignancy
`that is independent of host immunity. We show that cyclosporine
`(cyclosporin A), an immunosuppressant that has had a major
`impact on improving patient outcome
`following organ
`transplantation4,5, induces phenotypic changes, including inva-
`siveness of non-transformed cells, by a cell-autonomous mechanism.
`
`530
`
`© 1999 Macmillan Magazines Ltd
`
`NATURE | VOL 397 | 11 FEBRUARY 1999 | www.nature.com
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2070
`Breckenridge v. Novartis, IPR 2017-01592
`Page 1 of 5
`
`

`

`Our studies show that cyclosporine treatment of adenocarcinoma
`cells results in striking morphological alterations, including mem-
`brane ruf¯ing and numerous pseudopodial protrusions, increased
`cell motility, and anchorage-independent (invasive) growth. These
`changes are prevented by treatment with monoclonal antibodies
`directed at transforming growth factor-b (TGF-b). In vivo, cyclos-
`porine enhances tumour growth in immunode®cient SCID±beige
`
`mice; anti-TGF-b monoclonal antibodies but not control anti-
`bodies prevent the cyclosporine-induced increase in the number of
`metastases. Our ®ndings suggest that immunosuppressants like
`cyclosporine can promote cancer progression by a direct cellular
`effect that is independent of its effect on the host's immune cells, and
`that cyclosporine-induced TGF-b production is involved in this.
`We explored an alternative and autonomous cellular mechanism
`
`letters to nature
`
`e ~
`
`,!:
`
`0
`<ii .c
`E
`::, z
`
`1,500
`
`I
`
`:i:..
`E
`
`0)
`
`.S 1 000
`C:
`'
`
`0 e E
`
`l1l
`8
`ca. u..
`
`C:
`
`(!)
`I-
`
`Figure 1 Cyclosporine induces A-549 cells to acquire an invasive phenotype.
`Scanning electron microscopic photographs of A-549 cells grown on glass
`coverslips and incubated for 72 h with: nothing (control cells, a, b); 1 mg ml-1
`f); 1 mg ml-1
`cyclosporine (c, d); 2 ng ml-1 recombinant TGF-b1 protein (e,
`cyclosporine plus 30 mg ml-1 anti-TGF-b (g, h). Note that cyclosporine-conditioned
`cells, in a similar fashion to TGF-b1-treated cells, display membrane ruf¯ing and
`acquire exploratory pseudopodia, and that anti-TGF-b antibodies prevent these
`cyclosporine-induced morphological alterations. Scale bars, 10 mm. i, TGF-b
`concentrations (mean 6 s:d:) in supernatants obtained from untreated or cyclos-
`porine-treated A-549 cells. The cells were incubated for 72 h, in the absence or
`presence of 0.5 or 1.0 mg ml-1 cyclosporine, and a sandwich ELISA assay11 was
`used to quantify TGF-b levels.
`
`Figure 2 Cyclosporine stimulates the motility of A-549 cells. A-549 cells were
`grown for 72 h on 10-mm round polycarbonate membrane ®lters with 0.4 mm (a, b)
`or 3 mm (c, d) pore size in the absence (a, c) or presence (b, d) of 1 mg ml-1
`cyclosporine. The ®lters were removed from the culture dishes and the bottom
`surfaces were examined by scanning electron microscopy. Note that
`the
`pseudopodia of cyclosporine-treated cells grown on 0.4-mm pore size ®lters
`protrude through the pores to the bottom surface (b) whereas cyclosporine-
`treated cells grown on 3-mm pore ®lters migrate through the pores onto the
`bottom surface (d). Scale bars, 10 mm. e, Cyclosporine promotes migration of
`A-549 cells. A-549 cells were placed in the upper chamber of 12-well transwells
`(8 mm pore) at a density of 105 cells, and were incubated alone or with 0.5 or
`1.0 mg ml-1 cyclosporine or with 1.0 mg ml-1 cyclosporine plus 30 mg ml-1 anti-TGF-b
`antibodies (Ab). The cells that migrated into the lower chamber through the 8-mm
`pores of the polycarbonate membrane ®lters were counted after the cells had
`been dissociated by trypsinization. Results (mean 6 s:e:m:) are of three experi-
`ments carried out with duplicate samples.
`
`NATURE | VOL 397 | 11 FEBRUARY 1999 | www.nature.com
`
`© 1999 Macmillan Magazines Ltd
`
`531
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2070
`Breckenridge v. Novartis, IPR 2017-01592
`Page 2 of 5
`
`

`

`letters to nature
`
`for immunosuppressant-associated tumour progression. We tested
`the hypothesis that cyclosporine, independently of any effects on the
`host immune system, would programme non-invasive cells to
`acquire an invasive phenotype. The experimental basis for our
`hypothesis was our demonstration that cyclosporine promotes the
`transcription and functional expression of the TGF-b1 gene10,11 and
`the observation by others that TGF-b can promote tumour-cell
`invasion and metastasis12±14.
`A non-transformed human pulmonary adenocarcinoma (A-549)
`cell line14 that is not invasive in vitro was used as the indicator cell to
`test the hypothesis that cyclosporine can induce an invasive phe-
`notype. A-549 cells express functional receptors for TGF-b, and
`their growth and function are regulated by TGF-b (refs 11, 14). We
`carried out these experiments ex vivo to avoid any confounding
`effects of cyclosporine-associated inhibition of in vivo immune
`surveillance mechanisms.
`Figure 1 shows the striking morphological changes observed
`following cyclosporine treatment of A-549 cells. Scanning electron
`microscopic examination revealed that untreated A-549 cells display
`a cuboidal epithelial and non-invasive phenotype (Fig. 1a, b),
`whereas cyclosporine-treated cells show phenotypic alterations
`that are characteristic of invasive cells, that is, marked membrane
`ruf¯ing and the formation of numerous pseudopodia (Fig. 1c, d).
`Additional data (Fig. 1)
`support
`the hypothesis
`that
`the
`cyclosporine-induced acquisition of an invasive phenotype is due
`
`a
`
`b
`
`• 1so~--------~
`
`CsA-treated
`
`CsA-treated
`
`0.L..J---'--~
`Anchorage-dependent
`
`Anchorage-Independent
`
`Figure 3 Anchorage-independent growth of cyclosporine-conditioned A-549
`cells. Culture medium (3 ml) containing 104 cells and 1 mg ml-1 cyclosporine (b, d)
`or no cyclosporine (a, c) was loaded onto 5 ml of a 0.3% agarose layer containing
`MEM±10% FBS in 60-mm dishes. After 96 h incubation at 37 8C, cells grown on the
`surface of the agarose layer were examined with a phase-contrast microscope (a,
`b). For scanning electron microscopic observation (c, d), the soft gels were ®xed
`and then vertical thin sections were made. These slices were processed for
`scanning electron microscopy as described in Methods. Twenty slices were
`made from each agarose plate, and representative ones are shown. Note that
`pseudopodia of cyclosporine-treated A-549 cells protrude deeply into the soft gel
`under anchorage-independent growth conditions. Scale bars, 10 mm. e, Cyclos-
`porine-associated inhibition of anchorage-dependent proliferation of A-549 cells;
`f, cyclosporine-induced stimulation of anchorage-independent growth.
`
`to TGF-b. First, cyclosporine stimulated TGF-b secretion by A-549
`cells in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 1i); second, anti-
`15, in contrast to
`TGF-b monoclonal antibodies (1D11.16 IgG)1
`control IgG1 monoclonal antibodies, prevented the cyclosporine-
`induced morphological alterations (Fig. 1g, h); and third, recombi-
`nant TGF-b1 induced morphological alterations in A-549 cells that
`were similar to those elicited by cyclosporine (Fig. 1e, f). Our
`®nding that cyclosporine stimulates TGF-b1 production in A-549
`cells extends earlier observations that it induces T cells10, CCL-64
`mink lung epithelial cells11 and renal cells16 to hyperexpress TGF-b1.
`The phenotypic changes elicited by cyclosporine were reversible;
`incubation of cyclosporine-treated A-549 cells in cyclosporine-free
`culture medium for 48 h resulted in the reversal of the invasive
`phenotype and a return to the original morphology (data not
`shown).
`Cells capable of locomotion and invasiveness display exploratory
`pseudopodia17,18. Because cyclosporine induced numerous, long
`pseudopodia in A-549 cells, we investigated whether such cells
`acquired motility. To explore this, A-549 cells were seeded on
`polycarbonate membrane ®lters with three pore sizes (0.4, 3 and
`8 mm) in the presence or absence of cyclosporine; and the bottom
`surfaces of the membrane ®lters were examined by scanning
`electron microscopy. Our results show that many cyclosporine-
`induced pseudopodia protrude through 0.4-mm pores onto the
`bottom surface (Fig. 2b), whereas only a few pseudopodia protrude
`in the control (Fig. 2a). When the cells were grown on 3-mm pore
`®lters, many cyclosporine-treated cells and only few untreated cells,
`migrated through the pores to the bottom surface of the membrane
`®lter (Fig. 2c, d).
`To quantify the cell motility resulting from cyclosporine treat-
`ment, we used 8-mm pore ®lters in the migration assay. We found
`that the number of A-549 cells that migrated increased in propor-
`tion to the concentration of cyclosporine used to treat the cells, and
`that the increased cell motility was suppressed by anti-TGF-b
`antibodies (Fig. 2e), but not by the control IgG1 antibodies. Thus,
`cyclosporine-induced alterations in both morphology (Fig. 1) and
`cell motility (Fig. 2) were dependent on cyclosporine-induced TGF-
`b production.
`Anchorage-independent growth in vitro is considered a correlate
`of invasive tumour growth in vivo19,20, and so we next examined
`whether cyclosporine treatment results in anchorage-independent
`growth. A-549 cells were plated on soft agarose gels and grown for
`96 h (Fig. 3, see legend for details). Phase-contrast microscopic
`examination revealed that untreated A-549 cells retained their
`spherical shape and remained suspended in the culture medium,
`whereas cyclosporine-treated cells spread and proliferated strongly
`on the soft gel (Fig. 3a, b). Because it was dif®cult to determine by
`phase-contrast microscopy whether the pseudopodia extended
`along the surface of the agarose or penetrated deeper into the
`agarose layer, we made vertical thin sections of the soft gels and
`examined them by scanning electron microscopy to obtain side
`views. This strategy revealed that many fully grown pseudopodia of
`the cyclosporine-treated cells penetrated the agarose-gel layer and
`extended vertically into the gel plate (Fig. 3d). Also,
`these
`cells appeared to be supported by the extensively invaded pseudo-
`podia, in contrast to the absence of pseudopodial extensions in the
`control A-549 cells (Fig. 3c).
`Cyclosporine's effect on A-549 cells growth was contingent
`upon whether the culture conditions were anchorage-dependent
`or -independent. It inhibited the proliferation of A-549 cells under
`anchorage-dependent conditions but
`stimulated proliferation
`under anchorage-independent conditions (Fig. 3e, f).
`We next examined whether cyclosporine induces morphological
`and functional alterations in other cell types, looking at murine
`renal cell adenocarcinoma (Renca) cells, mouse mammary gland
`epithelial (NMuMG) cells and mink lung epithelial (CCL-64) cells.
`We found that cyclosporine treatment produced phenotypic
`
`532
`
`© 1999 Macmillan Magazines Ltd
`
`NATURE | VOL 397 | 11 FEBRUARY 1999 | www.nature.com
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2070
`Breckenridge v. Novartis, IPR 2017-01592
`Page 3 of 5
`
`

`

`letters to nature
`
`alterations in these epithelial cells as well. A representative example
`(Fig. 4a, b) shows that cyclosporine-treated Renca cells, in a similar
`fashion to cyclosporine-treated A-549 cells, display an invasive
`phenotype.
`We investigated whether cyclosporine would enhance the invasive
`and metastatic growth of tumour cells in vivo using Renca cells21,
`and two other tumour cell lines, mouse-derived Lewis lung carci-
`noma cells22 and human bladder transitional carcinoma cells23, as
`the tumour inoculum. SCID±beige mice (mice homozygous for
`both SCID and beige mutations24), which are de®cient in T cells, B
`cells and natural killer cells, were used as the host. The use of SCID±
`beige mice minimized the possibility that cyclosporine-induced
`depression of the host's immune system contributed to tumour
`progression.
`Cyclosporine increased the number of murine renal carcinoma
`metastases in SCID±beige mice (Fig. 4c, d). Data from four separate
`experiments showed that the number of renal cell cancer pulmonary
`metastases was 241 6 22 (mean 6 s:e:m:, n (cid:136) 21) in the control
`SCID±beige mice compared with 338 6 26 (n (cid:136) 18) in the cyclos-
`porine-treated mice (P (cid:136) 0:007; t-test) (Table 1). Also, the number
`of pulmonary metastases resulting from inoculation of murine
`Lewis lung carcinoma cells was 11 6 2 (n (cid:136) 9 mice) in the control
`mice compared with 28 6 4 (n (cid:136) 8 mice) with cyclosporine treat-
`ment (P (cid:136) 0:003), while the number of pulmonary metastases
`resulting from inoculation of human bladder transitional cancer
`cells was 63 6 18 (n (cid:136) 9 mice) in controls and 138 6 21 (n (cid:136) 9
`mice) in cyclosporine-treated mice (P (cid:136) 0:01) (Table 1).
`We
`investigated
`the
`effect
`of
`anti-TGF-b antibodies
`(1D11.16 IgG1)15 on the cyclosporine-induced increase in the
`metastases to determine whether in vivo tumour progression by
`cyclosporine was dependent on TGF-b1. Anti-TGF-b antibodies,
`but not control IgG1 antibodies, prevented the cyclosporine-
`induced increase in metastases. The number of pulmonary metas-
`tases was 350 6 22 (mean 6 s:e:m:, n (cid:136) 12) in the control mice,
`441 6 20 (n (cid:136) 10) in cyclosporine-treated mice, 284 6 34 (n (cid:136) 8)
`in mice treated with both cyclosporine and anti-TGF-b, and
`490 6 56 (n (cid:136) 4) in mice treated with cyclosporine and control
`IgG1 (P (cid:136) 0:0005; one-way ANOVA). The reduction in the number
`
`Table 1 Cyclosporine increases pulmonary metastases in SCID±beige mice
`
`Tumour inoculum
`
`Number of pulmonary metastases (mean 6 s:e:m:)
`
`P*
`With CsA
`Without CsA
`.............................................................................................................................................................................
`Murine Renca
`241 6 22 (n (cid:136) 21)
`338 6 26 (n (cid:136) 18)
`0.007
`.............................................................................................................................................................................
`Murine Lewis lung
`11 6 2 (n (cid:136) 9)
`28 6 4 (n (cid:136) 8)
`0.003
`carcinoma (LLC)
`.............................................................................................................................................................................
`Human bladder
`63 6 18 (n (cid:136) 9)
`138 6 21 (n (cid:136) 9)
`0.01
`cancer (T24)
`.............................................................................................................................................................................
`Tumour cells (1 3 105 or 5 3 105 in HBSS) were injected in the tail vein of SCID±beige mice.
`Cyclosporine (cyclosporin A; CsA; 20 mg per kg) was administered every other day from day
`-1 to the day of death. The mice were killed on day 19 (Renca),16 (LLC) or 23 (T24), and the
`number of metastases was counted as described30. n, Number of mice in each group; P
`value derived with t-test.
`
`of metastases found following the administration of anti-TGF-b
`antibodies to cyclosporine-treated mice was signi®cant at P , 0:01
`by ANOVA (Bonferoni P-value). In contrast, there was no signi®-
`cant difference between the number of metastases found in cyclos-
`porine-treated mice and that found in mice treated with combined
`cyclosporine and control IgG1 (P . 0:05). Our in vitro experiments
`show that the tumour cells are the sole source of TGF-b1 (Figs 1, 2).
`Many cell types, in addition to tumour cells, might contribute to
`cyclosporine-induced TGF-b1 hyperexpression in vivo.
`The malignancy-promoting effects of immunosuppressive drugs
`are thought to result from drug-induced T-lymphocyte dysfunction
`and resultant immunosuppression. On the other hand, the produc-
`tion of TGF-b by tumours represents a potential mechanism by
`which they evade the host's immune system25±28. Our demonstration
`that cyclosporine-treated, non-transformed cells acquire invasive-
`ness under in vitro conditions that allow no possible involvement of
`the host's immune system, and our in vivo data that cyclosporine
`promotes tumour growth in SCID±beige mice, suggest a cell-
`autonomous mechanism for cancer progression (Fig. 5). Speci®c
`therapeutic strategies that target pathways responsible for height-
`ened invasiveness (such as TGF-b1 regulation) are worth exploring
`and may be of value to people who are given allografts and to other
`individuals at increased risk of neoplasms.
`M
`
`Cyclosporlne
`
`_m_,Q;:..::1 ~.--1 ____ _
`
`~ . T-lymphocyte function t I
`
`+
`I Malignant transdifferentiation I
`Invasive carcinoma ! I TGF-~ H I
`~ ----1 lmmunosuppressionl
`\.------/
`ff
`
`Invasion
`Metastasis
`Recurrence
`
`Figure 5 Potential mechanisms for cyclosporine-associated tumour progression.
`In this formulation, cyclosporine induced TGF-b production by tumour cells
`promotes cell invasiveness by a cell-autonomous mechanism that is indepen-
`dent of and/or complementary to cyclosporine's immunosuppressive effect on
`the host's immune system.
`
`Figure 4 Cyclosporine induces renal cancer cells to acquire an invasive
`phenotype and promotes tumour growth in vivo. Scanning electron micrograph
`of murine renal adenocarcinoma cells incubated for 72 h in the absence (a) or
`presence of 1 mg ml-1 cyclosporine (b). Scale bars, 10 mm. Representative lungs,
`retrieved from untreated mice (c) and from cyclosporine-treated mice (d), are
`shown to illustrate the cyclosporine-associated increase in renal cell cancer
`pulmonary metastasis in SCID±beige mice.
`
`NATURE | VOL 397 | 11 FEBRUARY 1999 | www.nature.com
`
`© 1999 Macmillan Magazines Ltd
`
`533
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2070
`Breckenridge v. Novartis, IPR 2017-01592
`Page 4 of 5
`
`

`

`letters to nature
`
`. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
`
`Methods
`Cell line and culture. Human lung adenocarcinoma cells (A-549 cells; ATCC
`CCL 185; American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD), human bladder
`transitional carcinoma cells (ATCC HTB4, T24), mink lung epithelial cells
`(CCL-64; ATCC), mouse mammary gland epithelial cells (NMuMG; ATCC)
`and Lewis lung carcinoma cells (ATCC) were grown in minimum essential
`medium (MEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), at 37 8C in
`a 95% air±5% CO2 atmosphere. Murine renal adenocarcinoma cells (Renca
`cells; a gift from R. H. Wiltrout, National Cancer Institute) were maintained by
`in vivo serial passages in syngeneic BALB/c mice, as described21.
`Scanning electron microscopy. Cells were seeded at a density of 105 on 12-
`mm round glass coverslips or 10-mm round polycarbonate membrane ®lters
`(0.4 or 3 mm pore size) in 12-well Transwells (Costar), and grown for 72 h in the
`presence or absence of cyclosporine. To assess the ability of TGF-b-speci®c
`antibody to inhibit cyclosporine-mediated effects, A-549 cells were incubated
`in the presence of both cyclosporine and monoclonal antibodies (Genzyme)
`that recognize TGF-b1, -b2 and -b3. Cells were ®xed with PBS, pH 7.4,
`containing 2.0% glutaraldehyde, and processed as previously described29.
`Samples were examined using a JEOL 25SIII electron microscope.
`Quanti®cation of TGF-b. TGF-b was quanti®ed using a sandwich enzyme-
`linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method as previously described11. In
`brief, each well of multiwell ELISA assay plates was coated with anti-TGF-b1
`antibodies (1 mg ml-1). The plates were incubated for 2 h at 37 8C after the
`addition of various amounts of TGF-b1 in PBS or conditioned medium. After
`washing with PBS containing 0.2% Tween-20 (PBST), rabbit antiserum against
`TGF-b was added to each well. The plates were incubated at 37 8C for 1 h, the
`wells were washed with PBST, and then 100 ml of goat anti-rabbit IgG±alkaline
`phosphatase conjugates was added. Absorbance at 430 nm was measured using
`an ELISA assay reader. A-549 cells were cultured in serum-free medium to
`exclude contamination of cell-free supernatants by serum-derived TGF-b.
`Cell proliferation assay. For assaying anchorage-dependent growth, A-549
`cells were grown at a density of 2 3 104 cells per well in 12-well plates in the
`presence or absence of cyclosporine. After 96 h treatment, each well received
`2 mCi of methyl-3H-thymidine, and cells were incubated for an additional 4 h.
`They were washed twice with ice-cold PBS and ®xed with methanol for 60 min.
`After washing, the ®xed cells were lysed with 0.2 M NaOH and treated with cold
`10% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) for 15±20 min on ice. The radioactivity,
`recovered as cold TCA-insoluble precipitates, was used for measuring relative
`cell proliferation by comparing the radioactivity between control and experi-
`ment. For an anchorage-independent cell growth, cells spread well on agarose
`gel were counted using a phase-contrast microscope.
`In vivo tumour growth. Murine renal cell adenocarcinoma cells (1 3 105 in
`Hank's balanced salt solution; HBSS), murine Lewis lung carcinoma cells
`(5 3 105 cells) or human bladder cancer cells (1 3 105 cells) were injected in the
`tail vein of 6-week-old male SCID±beige mice. Cyclosporine (20 mg per kg in
`0.2 ml olive oil) was administered every other day starting from day -1, to day
`19 or 23 after tumour inoculation. On day 19 or 23 after tumour inoculation,
`mice were killed and the number of pulmonary metastases was determined30
`following endotracheal insuf¯ation of lungs with 15% India ink solution and
`bleaching the collected lungs in Fekete's solution. The effect of anti-TGF-b
`antibody and the control IgG1 antibody on the cyclosporine-induced increase
`in the number of pulmonary metastases was determined by intraperitoneal
`administration of 200 mg of antibody, on a daily basis starting from day -1 to
`day 19 after tumour inoculation.
`
`Received 21 September; accepted 15 December 1998.
`
`1. Penn, I. Cancers following cyclosporine therapy. Transplantation 43, 32±35 (1987).
`2. Yokoyama, I., Carr, B., Saitsu, H., Iwatsuki, S. & Starzl, T. E. Accelerated growth rates of recurrent
`hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation. Cancer 68, 2095±2100 (1991).
`3. London, N. J., Farmerry, S. M., Will, E. J., Davison, A. M. & Lodge, J. P. A. Risk of neoplasia in renal
`transp

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket