`
`
`Handbook
`
`of
`
`Basic
`
`Pharmacokinetics
`
`. . . including Clinical Applications
`
`
`
`
`
`FOURTH EDITION
`
`
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2060
`Breckenridge v. Novartis, IPR 2017-01592
`Page 1 of 6
`
`
`
`r
`
`
`
`
`
`To my wife, Ingrid
`
`Handbook
`
`of
`
`Basic
`
`Pharmacokinetics
`
`. . . including Clinical Applications
`
`
`
`
`
`by W. A. Ritschel
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Ph.D., M.D., Mr. Pharm., F.A.S.A., F.C.P.
`
`Professor of Pharmacokinetics
`
`
`
`
`
`and Biopharmaceutics
`College of Pharmacy
`
`
`
`Professor of Pharmacology
`
`
`
`
`
`-:-CIENTIF/C& TEe .. HNICAlnd Cell Biophysics
`
`
`
`
`'~NFnp~'AT(nM!;~t-lT~.Ff0I!ege of ~e~icin~
`
`
`
`' l'Tirlverslty of Cmcmnatl
`
`
`
`
`
`JUN 2 1 199 j
`
`
`
`Cincinnati 45267
`
`Y., ~;\ , _ .. ' - _ . :~~AI1I\Offe(;;_
`
`
`
`
`
`FOURTH EDITION, 1992
`
`
`DnUG INTELLIGENCE PUBLICATIONS, INC.
`
`
`
`
`HAMILTON, IL 62341
`
`
`
`
`
`•
`
`
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2060
`Breckenridge v. Novartis, IPR 2017-01592
`Page 2 of 6
`
`
`
`Copyright © 1992 by
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DRUG INTELLIGENCE PUBLICATIONS, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1241 Broadway, Hamilton, IL 62341 U.S.A.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`All rights, including that of translation, reserved . T his book is protected
`by copyright. No part of this book may bc rcproduced in any form or by
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`any means, including photocopying, or utilized by any information
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`storage and retrieval system without prior written permission from the
`copyright owner.
`
`
`
`Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
`
`
`
`
`
`
`mtschel, W. A. (Wolfgang A.)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Handbook of basic pharmacokinetics-including
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`clinical applications/by W. A. Ritschel - 4th cd.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`588 p. 10.8 X 18.2 em.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Includes bibliographical references and index.
`
`
`
`ISBN 0-914768-50-6 (soft)
`I. Title.
`I. Pharmacokinetics-Handbooks, manuals, etc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[DNLM: 1. Biopharmaceutics. 2. Chemistry, Pharmaceutical.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3. Drug Interaclions. 4. Kinetics. 5. Pharmacology.
`QV 38 R612h]
`
`
`
`
`RM301.5.R57
`
`615'.7- dc20
`DNLMIDLC
`
`
`
`
`
`for Library of Congress
`
`
`1992
`
`
`91-38402
`
`CIP
`
`I(
`
`
`NOTICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The information in this book has been derived from a wide variety of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`published drug information as well as appropriate unpublished data.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`While diligent care has been taken to assure the accuracy of the book's
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`content when it went to press, neither the author nor the publisher can
`be responsible [or the continued accuracy and completeness of informa(cid:173)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tion or any consequences therefrom. Ongoing research and new
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`developments in the field should be consulted.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pri nuxl ill the United States of America by Production Press, Inc.
`
`
`
`Jacksonville, Il linois 62650
`
`
`
`
`Fourth Edition 1992
`
`
`
`First Printing 1992
`
`
`
`Second Printing 1995
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2060
`Breckenridge v. Novartis, IPR 2017-01592
`Page 3 of 6
`
`
`
`r
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dose Dumping is a term used to describe the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`achievement of sustained drug concentration by
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`simply increasing the dose size or by accidental
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`fast release of drug from a sustained release dosage
`
`form.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dose-Response Curve is the graphical presenta(cid:173)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tion of the pharmacological or clinical effectiveness
`
`
`
`
`
`
`or toxicity (response) versus dose. A log dose-re(cid:173)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`sponse curve is sigmoid with a straight-line ~iddle
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`section; a log dose-probability curve results III an
`
`
`
`entirely straight line.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dose Size is the amount of drug in lAg ( = mcg) ,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`mg, units or other dimensions to be administered.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dosing Interval is the time period between ad(cid:173)
`
`
`
`
`ministration of maintenance doses.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`A Drug is a chemical compound of synthetic,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`semisynthetic, natural or biological origi,? whic~ in(cid:173)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`teracts with human or animal cells. The mterachons
`
`may be quantified, whereby these resulting actions
`
`
`
`
`
`
`are intended to prevent, to cure or to reduce ill
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`effects in the human or animal body, or to detect
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`disease-causing manifestations.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`A Drug Specialty or Brand Product is a drug
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`product, usually of unvarying com~osition, labeled
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`with a registered trade mark of a smgle company.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Drug Release or Liberation is the delivery of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`active ingredient from a dosage form .into .solutio?
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The dissolution medium is either a bIOlogICal flUId
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`or an artificial test fluid (in vitro). Drug release is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`characterized by the speed. (liberation rate con-
`
`7
`DEFINITIONS AND GLOSSARY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`stant) and the amount of drug appearing in solu(cid:173)
`
`tion.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`A Drug Product or Dosage Form is the gross
`
`
`
`
`pharmaceutical form containing the active in(cid:173)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[drug(s)] and vehicle substances
`gredient(s)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`necessary in formulating a medicament of desired
`
`
`
`
`
`
`dosage, desired volume and desired application
`
`
`
`
`form, ready for administration.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Drug-Receptor Interaction is the combining of a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`drug molecule with the receptor for which it has
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`affinity, and the initiation of a pharmacologic
`
`
`
`
`
`response by its intrinsic activity.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Elimination Half-Life of a drug is the time in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`hours necessary to reduce the drug concentration
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in the blood, plasma or serum to one-half after
`
`
`
`
`
`
`equilibrium is reached. The elimination half-life
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`may be influenced by: dose size, variation in
`urinary excretion (pH),
`
`
`
`
`intersubject variation,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`age, protein binding, other drugs and diseases
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(especially renal and liver diseases).
`Loss of drug from the body, as described by the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`elimination half-life, means the elimination of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`administered parent drug molecule
`(not
`its
`
`
`
`
`
`
`metabolites) by urinary excretion, metabolism or
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`other pathways of elimination (lung, skin, etc.).
`
`
`
`
`
`Enterohepatic Recirculation (Biliary Recycling)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`is the phenomenon in which drugs emptied via bile
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`into the small intestine can be reabsorbed from the
`
`
`
`
`
`intestinal lumen into systemic circulation.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Enzyme Induction is the increase in enzyme
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`content or rate of enzymatic processes resulting in
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2060
`Breckenridge v. Novartis, IPR 2017-01592
`Page 4 of 6
`
`
`
`264
`
`
`
`
`Equation 17 Al can be rewritten for total drug
`
`
`
`
`
`concentration:
`
`
`
`
`Eq. 17.49
`
`and, hence, the free drug concentration is:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`css, f = DIT
`
`
`
`u
`-
`
`Clintr
`
`
`-
`
`
`
`Eq.17.50
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The influence of protein binding due to dis(cid:173)
`
`
`
`
`
`placement from binding on pharmacokinetic
`
`
`parameters is shown in Table 17-14.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Inspection of Tables 17-3 and 17-4 reveals some
`
`
`
`
`
`
`important facts which can be summarized as
`
`
`
`
`
`follows:
`
`
`
`
`
`• Change in liver blood flow will influence the
`
`
`
`
`
`rate of metabolism of drugs with high extrac(cid:173)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tion ratios (E > 0.7). Increase in liver blood
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`flow will increase hepatic and total clear(cid:173)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ance.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`• Change in liver blood flow will not influence
`
`drugs with low extraction ratios (E < 0.3).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`• Change in protein binding of drugs with high
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`extraction ratios (E > 0.7) will not influence
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`total clearance.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`• Decrease in protein binding increases the
`
`total clearance of drugs with low extraction
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ratios (E < 0.3).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`• Decrease in protein binding does not in(cid:173)
`fluence the total clearance of drugs with high
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`extraction ratios (E > 0.7). However, be-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`265
`CLEARANCE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`cause the intrinsic clearance decreases, the
`
`
`
`
`
`free drug concentration increases; hence,
`
`
`
`
`pharmacodynamic response may increase.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`• In the relationship between Cltot. V d and tl/2'
`
`
`
`
`
`
`total clearance and volume of distribution
`
`
`
`
`
`are the independent variables, the elimina(cid:173)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tion half-life is the dependent variable:
`
`
`0.693, Vd
`
`tl/2 = _ _ _ _
`
`
`Cltot
`
`
`
`
`Eq.17 .51
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`For clinical applications, it is not feasible to col(cid:173)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`lect a sufficient number of blood samples to either
`
`
`
`
`perform pharmacokinetic parameter calculations
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`after curve-fitting, or to calculate the AUC. Two
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`methods can be used for estimating the total
`
`
`
`
`
`clearance from a single blood sample. If the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`bioavailability is not known, the clearance is
`Cltot/f:
`
`
`
`Method I
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Method I is based on a blood sample C(t) taken
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`during the terminal phase, the literature value for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Vd, and the body weight, BW:
`
`
`D
`
`Cltot/f = [In (_
`
`
`) -
`
`Vd/f
`
`
`Vd/f
`
`
`In C(t)]. _
`
`t
`
`
`
`. BW
`
`
`
`Eq.17.52
`
`
`
`Method II
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Method II is based on the postulate that in the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`absence of enzyme induction or enzyme inhibi(cid:173)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tion, the total area under the curve after a single
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`dose, AUCo-oo, is equal to the area under the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`curve during one dosing interval at steady state,
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2060
`Breckenridge v. Novartis, IPR 2017-01592
`Page 5 of 6
`
`
`
`266
`
`AUCTn-Tn+l. AUCTn-+Tn+l can be obtained frOth
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the steady state concentration:
`
`
`
`
`
`<,\
`
`
`
`Eq. 17.53
`
`
`
`
`Eq. 17.54
`
`
`or
`
`
`D
`
`Cltotlf = -~,----
`C~v • T
`
`Eq.17.55
`
`
`
`If one wants to convert the total plasma
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`clearance to blood clearance, Equation 17.56 can
`
`
`
`
`
`be used:
`
`
`
`Cltot blood
`
`
`
`Cltot plasma
`
`
`I-Hematocrit
`
`
`Eq. 17.56
`
`
`
`~or drugs bound to erythrocytes, Equation 17.57
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IS used:
`
`
`
`Cltot blood
`
`
`
`Cltot plasma
`
`
`
`Eq. 17.57
`
`
`
`
`where A
`is
`
`
`blood/plasma.
`
`
`
`
`the drug concentration
`
`
`
`
`ratio
`
`
`
`267
`CLEARANCE
`
`
`
`Table 17-13. Influence of Change in Blood Flow on
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Total Clearance and Extraction Ratio
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CHANGE IN:
`DR~~ERTY:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Extraction Ratio Total Clearance
`BLOOD
`E
`FLOW
`PXR TRACTION RATIO E
`Cltol
`
`
`
`
`
`
`:----~------------------~--
`
`
`LOW
`n.C .
`
`E < 0.3
`
`
`
`n.c .
`
`
`n.C.
`High
`
`~=.~7 ____ ____ __ _ n._c_. _______ _
`
`
`
`
`
`t" Increase; ~ = decrease; n.c. = no change
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Table 17-14. Influence of Change in Protein Binding due to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Displacement (Increase in Free, Unbound Fraction iu) from
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Protein Binding On Apparent Volume of Distribution, Vd,
`
`
`
`Elimination Half-Life, tl/2, Total Clearance, Cltoto Intrinsic
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Clearance, Clintro Total Area Under the Curve, AUCo-+oo,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`~ Pharmacologic Response, R.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DRUG PROPERTY: ____ C_H_A_N_G_ E _IN_: ________ __
`
`
`
`
`EXTRACTION
`
`
`RATIO E
`LoW
`
`
`E < 0.3
`
`
`
`Vd
`Large
`
`Small
`
`
`
`Vd
`t
`n.c.
`
`
`
`t'l'
`
`Cllot
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Cllntr AUCo~oo R
`
`n.C.
`
`n.c.
`
`
`Large
`
`n.c.
`High
`
`
`E > 0.7
`
`n.C.
`Small
`
`
`n.c.
`
`
`t = increase; ~ '" decrease; n.c. = no change
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`n.c.
`
`n.c.
`
`
`Extrarenal Clearance Clext l"lIren.
`
`
`
`Being able to calculate the total clearance from
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`blood level curves and the renal clearance from
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`blood and urine data, it is then possible to combine
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`all other pathways of excretion, including metabo(cid:173)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`lism, in one parameter, the extrarenal clearance
`
`
`
`
`
`which is the difference between the total and the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`renal clearance as given in Equation 17.58.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Clextrnren. = Cl tot -- Clren . corr. [ml/min]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Eq. 17.58
`
`
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2060
`Breckenridge v. Novartis, IPR 2017-01592
`Page 6 of 6
`
`