throbber
United States Patent {191
`
`[11] Patent Number:
`
`4,568,535
`
`Diesel“!
`
`[45] Date of Patent:
`
`Feb. 4, 1986
`
`[54] COMPOSITION FOR PERIODONTAL
`ADMINISTRATION
`.
`
`‘[56]
`
`References Cited
`PUBLICATIONS
`
`[1'6]
`
`Inventor: Walter J. Inesehe, 1814 Hermitage,
`Ann Arbor, Mich. 48104
`
`Soskolne et al., New Sustained Release Dosage Form of
`Chlorhexidine
`for Dental Use,
`J. Perio, Res,
`18:330-336.
`
`[21] Appl' No“ 631’s“
`[22] Fiied:
`Jul. 16, 1934
`
`Pn‘maly Examiner—Johnnie R. Brown
`AW!“ Examineruc. Joseph Faraei
`[57]
`ABSTRACT
`
`Related U.S. Application Data
`-
`-
`_
`.N _
`,
`-
`[63] fififlm “a” “5” ° 405 790’
`
`A _
`“g 6’ ‘9
`
`82’
`
`A composition for periodontal administration and a
`method of periodontal treaunent involving a slow re-
`lease device which can be placed directly into the peri-
`odontal pocket where metronidazole, with or without
`- AGIK 9% antic! '
`are released over periods ofdaysm weeks
`A61]! 9
`4 , ant/36$ at a c'
`noentration for anaerobes in the domain of
`I
`424/23
`the .
`-
`, 26, fi, 19,
`1’35;
`W5
`I.
`
`Int. Cl.‘
`[51]
`[52] us. (:1.
`
`[53] Field of Search
`
`42
`424/273 R, 52;
`
` tai pocket.
`
`_
`
`— 2 Gains, 3 Drawing Figures
`I
`
`Dr. Reddy's - EX1015
`
`Page 1
`
`Dr. Reddy's - EX1015
`Page 1
`
`

`

`. US. Patent Feb. 4, 1986
`
`Sheet] of3
`
`4,568,535
`
`
`
`
`
`El
`
`
`
`FIG.[
`
`
`
`
`
`=
`
`5
`
`.
`
`I—m
`2' 2|
`$3
`DH
`'52
`E:LIJn-
`
`3-—
`
`
`
`V
`
`“Ml A
`
`
`
`Page 2
`
`

`

`U. S. Patent
`
`Feb. 41.1986
`
`Sheet 2 of 3
`
`4,363,535
`
`
`
`
`
`uuzgmfim4Emma9562quOImEmu...mumE.nowinema—N.07..
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`#5....who:.343am...“20m92mm2.05:$352.0zuuahmm
`
`
`
`
`
`hum:uE.5.30miHE_Elmaz.2:ao...u.mhuzuon.Luna
`
`
`
`._mu02¢5ENE._$2.52azoummoz:
`
`1..#2925mm
`
`5:“
`
`EH33:8.—
`
`L635as:mm
`
`:55...
`
`-Li:
`
`553:52
`
`
`
`
`
`22:23..22:23;_gangs...”
`
`.
`
`_
`
`-3
`
`Page 3
`
`Page 3
`
`
`

`

`U. S. Patent
`
`Feb. 4, 1986
`
`S35.1
`
`m.07..
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`onmind—LGas—Edamun—EDGEN—DOPZOU035.02—50%Ewan—h.Mum—ELOHus—kg."—
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`E—F‘EDh—flMEMEDunn‘s—n—unEUMEI—.1.—MrFP5:NFC:.NKOEE25.BM5mph—Un—FEUEMI...HEM;mun—LNME2—.rumzo.flHU<JlstJ¢>_02—§m
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`em%2.23..
`\EE.
`r...#325mu
`
`
`.—
`
`.gB.E3E3“.0\1\\
`....x»EEN
`
`..IIIIIaII
`
`.mNWEB-W
`
`__
`
`
`gaaficuwcaz#35»5HmX.a\Emma3.23352.22:
`49___.a..._...X)a....__.5.2:,
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 4
`
`Page 4
`
`
`
`

`

`4,568,535
`
`1
`
`COMPOSITION FOR PERIODONTAL
`ADMINISTRATION
`
`CROSS-REFERENCES
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`55
`
`This is a continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 405,790 filed
`8/6/82 now abandoned.
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`1. Technical Field
`This invention relates to a composition for periodon-
`tal administration that is cidal for anaerobes in the do-
`main of the periodontal pocket and to a novel method of
`treatment of anaerobic infections in periodontal disease
`that is dependent upon the slow release of metronida-
`21012 from a plastic film that is placed within the peri-
`odontal pocket, and which film resides in such pocket
`for a period of days to weeks.
`2. Description of Prior Art
`The main cause of tooth loss in adults is periodontal
`disease. Yet, surprisingly, less than one percent of the
`public expditures for dental treatment is for periodon-
`tal disease (see J. Dent. Educ. 43:320‘0979). This is
`because conventional periodontal treatment is too ex-
`pensive for most individuals, mainly due to the labor
`intensive, symptomatic treatment that is usually per-
`formed by highly skilled specialists. .
`Periodontal disease is an all-inclusive term for a vari-
`ety of clinical entities that are forms of either gingivitis
`or periodontitis. Gingivitis is an inflammation of the
`gingiva or gums that can be associated with poor oral
`hygiene and/or hormonal states of the host. It is as-
`sumed, but not proven in the human, that gingivitis will
`progress to a periodontitis, which is the form of the
`disease in which the infection has progressed to involve
`the oral tissues which retain the teeth in the jaw bone.
`Periodontitis is the more severe form of the disease, and
`if untreated, will eventuate in the loss of the tooth.
`Dentists have long assumed that periodontal disease
`originates by the overgth of bacteria on the tooth
`surfaces in aggregates known as dental plaque. If this
`plaque persists for long periods of time on the tooth
`surfaces, it may in some instances calcify, forming the
`hard substance known as calculus. Numerous studies
`describe chemical agents which can in vitro and in vivo
`reduce plaque formation and calculus However, none
`of these chemical agents has been reported to be suc-
`cessful in treating periodontitis.
`A substantial number of difi'erent types of compounds
`and compositions have been deveIOped for use as anti-
`bacterial and antiplaque agents, e.g., benzethonium
`chloride and cetyl pyridinlurn chloride, disclosed in
`US. Pat. No. 4,110,429, or as anticalculus agents, e.g.,
`2-phosphono-butane 1,2,4—triearbosy1ic acid, discloaed
`in U.S. Pat. No. 4,224,303. These compounds are do
`signed to be used by the individual in dentifrices, dental
`powders, pastes, mouthwashes, nonabrasive gels, chew-
`ing gums, topical solutions and the like, e.g., see U.S.
`Pat. No. 4,205,061. They are designed to be used as
`prophylactic agents, usually without requiring a pre-
`scription or supervision during usage, e.g., see US. Pat.
`No. 4,251,507. Often they are compounded with deter-
`gents and other cleaning agents, and this cleaning action
`is often an important aspect of the invention, e.g., sec
`15.8. Pat. Nos. 4,251,507 and 4,205,061. None of these
`compounds or compositions are designed to be used as
`antimicrobial agents for the treatmt of periodontitis,
`
`2
`nor are they formulated to be slow release devices for
`these antimicrobial agents in vivo.
`Recent research in periodontal disease (see, for exam-
`ple. Chemotherapy of Dental Plaque Infections, Oral
`Sci. Rev. 9:65-107, 1976) indicates that gingivitis and
`periodontitis are characterized by different types of
`bacteria. Gingivitis is associated with the accumulation
`of gram positive cocci and actinomyces, whereas perio—
`dontitis is characterized by proportional increases in
`anaerobic bacteria, Such as spirochetes and black pig-
`mented bacteroides (see Host-Parasite Interactions in
`Periodontal Disease. R. J. Genoo and S. E. Mergenlta-
`gen, eds. Amer. Soc. for Microbiol. Washington, DC.
`p. 27—45, 62—75, 1982). The difl'erent bacterial composi-
`tions of plaque associated with either gingivitis or perio-
`dontitis suggest that a mode of treatment that is effec-
`tive in gingivitis may not be efi'ective in periodontitis.
`This is an important factor in the present invention, as
`previous discoveries in the area of periodontal disease
`have assumed that there is no bacterial specificity in
`periodontal disease. This is now known to be incorrect.
`Thae bacterial differences in plaque may explain why
`an agent effective in plaque control, arch as chlorhesi-
`dine, has little effect on gingivitis and no published
`effect on periodontitis.
`Another important finding from recent periodontal
`research is that the composition of the dental plaque
`will differ according to its location on the tooth surface.
`Above the gingival or gum margin, facultative bacteria,
`such as gram positive cocci and rods, are numerically
`dominant, whereas below the gum margin, anaerobic
`motile bacteria such as spirochetes, and anaerobic gram
`negative rods including the black-pigmented bacteroi-
`des are predominant.
`in other words, two different
`microbial ecosystems are present on the same tooth
`surface.
`This is illustrated in the accompanying drawings in
`FIGS. 1a and lb. which show a cross section of a tooth
`10, a periodontal packet 11, and the gingiva or gum 12.
`The tooth illustrated in FIG. 1c exhibits periodontal
`disease in which periodontal attachment of the tooth to
`the alveolar bone has is destroyed, and a periodontal
`pocketllhasbeenformedbetweenthegumflandthe
`root surface of the tooth. Clinical assessment of such
`deterioration of teeth is made by measuring the depth of
`the pocket. This is done by inserting a periodontal
`probe or ruler, a thin metal rod (not shown), to the base
`of the pocket 14. Two measurements can be obtained
`with the probe. One, called the pocket depth a, in illus-
`tration 1a is the distance between the height of the
`gingival margin 13 to the base of the pocket 14. The
`other measurement. 5!.
`is the distance between the
`height of the gingival margin 13 and the cemente-
`enamel junction (012.015. The CEJ is extremely valu-
`able because it gives a permanent reference mark on
`eachtoothsurfacefromwhichonecanbasefurther
`measurements. It enables one to divide the pocket depth
`measurement into two components: the distance be-
`tween the CEJ and the top ofthe gingival margin. y.
`and the distance between the CE] and the bottom ofthe
`pocket, z. This letter measurement is called the attach-
`mean distance. As illustrated in the diseased tooth, the
`attachmentdistanoeisfimmandthepocketdepthiss ,
`mm.
`
`FIG. 1b is an enlargent of a section of the type
`shown in FIG. la in which the periodontal pocket 11 is
`now filled with bacterial plaque. Note that the plaque
`lies between the tooth and the gingiva in the space
`
`Page 5
`
`Page 5
`
`

`

`-.
`
`3
`called the periodontal pocket. Also note that the bacte-
`rial composition of the plaque varies according to its
`spatial relationship to the gingival margin 13. Above the
`gingival margin the plaque is known as the supragingi-
`val plaque, and it generally has equal numbers of gram
`positive (+) cocci and rods, fewer gram negative (-)
`rods and even fewer motile rods. Next comes a section
`of plaque which contains proportionally more gram
`negative (—) rods and some spirochetes. This plaque is
`known as the gingival margin plaque. Finally, in the
`bottom of the pocket, is found a plaque which is domi-
`nated by anaerobic gram negative rods and motile rods,
`including black-pigmented bacteroides and spirochetes.
`This plaque is known as subgingival or pocket plaque
`and it is this plaque that is the etiologic agent of perio-
`dontitis.
`It is clear from this illustration and from recent elec-
`tronmicroscopic examinations of plaque that the subgin-
`gival plaque is distinct from supragingival plaque (see J.
`Periodontol. 47:1-18, 1976). This has important implica-
`tions for our invention, as previous patents for the use of
`antimicrobials described agents that are delivered to the
`supragingival plaque. it can be surmised from the illus-
`tration and now accepted as fact,
`that antimicrobial
`agents delivered in dentifrices, dental powders, pastes,
`mouthrinses, nonabrasive gels, chewing gums, topical
`solutions and the like, will minimally penetrate into the
`pocket for a distance of about 1 to 3 mm. As periodontal
`pockets may be 12 to 13 mm in depth, it is apparent that
`the topical application of any antimicrobial agent, even
`metronidazole, to the supragingival plaque will have no
`_. or minimal effect on the subgingival plaque and accord-
`ingly, should have little if any effect on periodontitis.
`Our invention is, therefore, quite distinct from the topi~
`cal application of metronidazole in water or in vehicles,
`such as gels or pastes as disclosed in US. Pat. No.
`3700,685, as our invention will place the metronidazole
`directly into the periodontal pocket, where it will be in
`contact with the bacteria in the subgingival plaque.
`Also, our invention is different frOm previous patent
`applications which incorporated antimicrobials in denti-
`. frices, gels, powders, etc. which were designed to be
`delivered to the supragingival tooth sites, e.g., see US.
`Pat. Nos. 4,205,061, 4,251,507, 4,224,308 and 3,700,685
`and had as their treatment goal, the control of dental
`plaque and oral cleanliness.
`From a review of these patents and other information
`in the literature it is apparent that an improved means of
`treating periodontitis is needed in dentistry. From a
`reading of information in the art, it is obvious that the
`basic need of treating an anaerobic infection in the peri-
`odontal pocket is not satisfied. None of the means pres-
`ently available appears to get at the heart of the prob-
`lem, which is finding an improved means of delivering
`an antimicrobial agent specific for anaerobic organism,
`such as spirochetes and black pigmented bacteroides, to
`the periodontal pocket for continuous periods of S to 10
`days or more.
`Such a delivery can be achieved with systemic anti-
`microbials. Indeed, short-term oral administration of
`metronidazole in humans and in dogs caused a sustained
`reduction of spirochetes and black pigmented bacteroi-
`des for weeks to months (see for example J. Clinical
`Periodontol. 8:29—44, 1981,
`ibid 10:100—1 12 1983).
`However, as is known, such sysric usage of metroni-
`dazole can be associated with undesirable side effects,
`such as nausea. Also, there is the suggestion from animal
`toxicity studies that metronidazole is a weak tumorigen
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`SS
`
`60
`
`65
`
`4,568,535
`
`4
`(for example, see Proceedings of International Metroni-
`daze-1e Conference, Excerpta Mcdica, 1976). For these
`reasons, it is desirable to use the lowest possible dosage
`of metronidazole consistent with a therapeutic effect.
`The slow-releasefilm-metronidazole device, which is
`described in this invention, may reduce the amount of
`metronidazole necessary to treat advanced cases of
`periodontitis by as much as 99%.
`Thus, the present invention not only describes an
`effective means of treating anaerobic periodontal infec-
`tion, but does so at dosages that are greatly reduced
`commred to systemic or oral administration of the same
`agent(s). This safety factor is an important aspect of the
`present inventiou.
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`INVENTION
`
`It is an object of the present invention to provide
`improved means for treating periodontal
`infections,
`such as periodontitis which occur below the gingival
`margin in the periodontal pocket.
`It is another object of the invention to provide means
`of distributing metronidazole, or other antimicrobial
`agents, to the peridontal pocket that avoids the disad-
`vantages of the prior art.
`It is another object of the invention to incorporate
`metronidazole, or other antimicrobial agents, in a slow
`release device that can be placed by the clinician di-
`rectly into the infected periodontal pocket.
`It is a further object of the invention that the slow
`release device will release metronidazole, or other anti-
`microbial agents, over a period of 5 to 10 days or more.
`It is a further object of this invention that the release
`of metronidazole, or other antimicrobial agents, by the
`slow release device will significantly reduce and/or
`eliminate the levels of periodontopathic bacteria resid-
`ing in the periodontal pocket.
`Other objects of this invention will be set forth in, or
`be apparent from, the following description of the in-
`vention.
`-
`A novel means for accomplishing the foregoing ob-
`jects and other features and advantages of the present
`invention are achieved by incorporating metronidazole
`(Zenith Laboratory, Northvale, NJ.), or other antimi-
`crobial agents,
`in a polymer, such as ethylcellulose
`(Hercules, Inc, Wilmington, Del.), which can be placed
`directly into the diseased periodontal pocket by the
`clinician. Such metronidazole-ethylcellulose films Will
`release metronidazole continuously into the pocket
`over a period of 7 to 14 days or more.
`The present invention concerns a composition for
`subgingival administration of an antimicrobial agent
`directly to the periodontal pocket in patients exhibiting
`periodontitis. The composition comprises a pharmaceu-
`ticale acceptable polymeric matrix, such as ethylcellu-
`lose, (see J. Dent. Res. 54:1392, 1980), which contains
`metronidazole. The polymer-metronidazole combina-
`tion is formulated so that the metronidazole is slowly
`released from the polymer into the environment of the
`periodontal packet. For purposes of this invention one
`uses a concentration of metronidazole such that a single
`dose of the composition provides sustained release of
`metronidazole for 7 to 14 days or more. A preferred
`dosage for a periodontal pocket, for example, is one in
`which each pocket receives about two mg of metroni-
`dazole, preferably in a slow release form that releases
`from 0.01 to 0.2 mg per day for each day that the poly-
`meric device remains in the periodontal pocket.
`
`Page 6
`
`Page 6
`
`

`

`4,568,535
`
`5
`A preferred anti-periodontitis formulation is given
`hereinafter by way of example and is presented for the
`purpose of illustration but not of limitation.
`In this regard, the invention contemplates a preferred
`embodiment in which metronidazole comprises 1 to
`20% th of the ethylcellulose film. Such a film is
`achieved by slowly dissolving 20 g of metronidazole
`(Zenith Laboratory) in chloroform, followed by 80 g of
`ethylcellulose Type N-Zz (Hercules, Inc), so as to form
`a slurry. Ethylcellulose Type N—‘l or N-7NF may also
`be used. This slurry is then poured or cast into molds,
`which determine the thickness of the film. The chloro-
`form is allowed to evaporate, leaving behind a thin film
`in which the metronidazole is enmeshed within the
`matrix of the ethylcellulose. This meuonidazole-ethyl-
`cellulose film acts as a slow release device for metroni-
`dazole, as is described in the following test procedure.
`Acirculardiscofthefilm,measufing5mmindiame-
`ter and 0.3 mm thick was placed on a bacteriological
`agar medium in a Petri plate that had been previously
`inoculated with Bacteraides gingiwiit. a bacterium com-
`monly found in the subginglval plaque and a suspected
`periodontal pathogen. This bacterium or germ subse-
`quently grew on this medium, except in the vicinity of
`the disc. In the vicinity of the disc there was a zone of
`no growth that measured from I to 1.5 cm in diameter.
`This zone of inhibition would have been larger, except
`that the disc was removed after one day and placed on
`a second agar plate that also had been previously inocu-
`lated with B. girtgfmltit After a zone of bacterial inhibi-
`tion was noted about the site where the disc had been
`placed. This disc was subsequently transferred sequen-
`tially to other agar plates, inoculated with B. gingimiir
`and each time a zone of inhibition was noted. The sup-
`ply of metronidacole in the disc was eventually ex-
`hausted after 70 days incubation on agar medium. dur-
`ing which time it was transferred about 55 times. If the
`disc was made thicker, i.e., about 0.5 mm thick, it could
`be incubated about 110 days before its supply of metro-
`nidazole was exhausted. During this period the disc was
`transferred about 75 times to fresh bacteriological me-
`dium newly inoculated with B. gingivalis. Thus the
`length of time that the disc can release the metronida-
`zole is a factor of the film thickness provided that the
`composition remains unchanged. In other trials the
`discs were able to similarly inhibit Bacterom'es interme-
`dias and the anaerobic spirochete known as Theponemc
`denricelc. These three species of bacteria are representa-
`tive of the anaerobic black pigmented bacteroides spe-
`cies and spirochetes respectively that are associated
`with periodontitis. The fact that these bacteria were
`inhibited by the disc containing 20% metronidazole,
`80% ethylcellulose after 70 to 110 days of incubation
`during which 55 to 75 serial transfers of the disc oc-
`curred, attests to the fact that the formulation described
`in this invention acts as a slow release device for the
`metronidazole.
`
`As it is well known in the periodontal literature, the
`absence ofblack pigmented bacteroides and spirochetes
`is associated with periodontal health, and the propor-
`tional increase of these organisms is associated with
`periodontal disease (see J. Clin. Pmiodontol. 5:115-132,
`1978: Host-Parasite Interactions in Periodontal Disease.
`R. I. Genco and S. E. Mergenhagen, eds. Amer. Soc.
`for Microbiol. Washington, DC. pp. 27—45, 62-75,
`1982). Thus, antimicrobial agents, which suppress these
`microbes, have therapeutic value in the treatment of
`periodontitis. Indeed, in studies in which systemic met-
`
`6
`ronidazole was given for one week and compared to
`placebo medication, the metronidazole treatment was
`associated with a significant improvement in periodon-
`tal health. as evident by pocket reduction and decreased
`proportions of spirochetes and black pigmented bacte-
`roides. (J. Clin. Periodontal. 8:29-44, 1980; J. Periodon-
`tol. 55:325, 1984).
`-
`The usage of a metronidazole-ethylcellulose film, as
`embodied in this invention, will achieve the same thera-
`peutic result, but at much lower dosages. For example,
`a standard art-recognized systemic treatment for perio-
`dontitis by the oral route using oral tablets requires a
`total of about 5250 to 7000 mg of metronidazole. How-
`ever, non-systemic treatment for periodonth with the
`slow release composition of the present invention uses
`only about 2.4 mg per periodontal pocket. As patients
`with the most advanced cases of periodontitis may have
`about 20 diseased pockets, and if the metronidazole
`discsareplacedineachofthesepoekets, thenthetotal
`dosage of metronidazole would be about 50 mg. This
`total dosage is less than 1% of the total systemic (Oral)
`dose and reflects a substantial safety factor over sys-
`temic treatment with oral men-onidazole. Thus, another
`aspect of the present invtion is its outstanding safety
`factor relative to systemic administration.
`This is possible because the nature of the invention
`allows the metronidazole to be placed exactly in and to
`the depths of the pockets where the periodontitis exists.
`The clinician diagnoses the site where the periodontitis
`exists and then cuts or contours the metronidazole-
`ethylceliulose film for each of the individual pockets, so
`that its resulting contour matches the dimensions and
`contour of each pocket in turn so that the resulting
`contoured film can be placed completely and match-
`ineg within all of the pockets below the gingival mar-
`gin. This is illustrated in FIG. 2, which shows a premo-
`lar 20, a first molar 21 and a second molar 22. The
`gingival margin 23 is that level ofgum which is seen
`about the teeth. The pocket is that space below the
`gingival margin where the tooth was formerly attached
`toitssupportingtissueAsshownandasexpressed
`dimensionally the difference between the gingival mar-
`gin and the base of the pocket. is. pocket depth 24,
`about the first and second molars ranges from 6 to 8
`mm, and about the premolar, ranges from about 2 to 4
`mm. The metronidazole-ethyloellulose film is con-
`toured by the dentist to fit subgingivally in those sites
`about the molars that have pockets of 6 or more mm.
`This is shown in FIG. 3, where two such contoured
`films 36 have been placed in the pockets about the first
`and second molars. Note in particular the area on the
`teeth where the roots separate or bifurcate. These bifur-
`cations 25, are notoriously difficult to treat by conven-
`tional mechanical debridement and are completely inac-
`cessible to antimicrobials delivered by mouthrinses,
`dentifrices, gels, etc. However, the film can be placed
`over and within the bifurcations, thus delivering the
`metronidazole to this part of the tooth that usually is
`refractory to most forms of conventional periodontal
`therapy. Thus, another aspect of the present invention is
`that bifurcations and trifurcations (root separation on
`the maxillary or upper teeth) can be exposed to thera-
`peutic levels of metronidazole for periods of time suffi-
`cient to treat an anaerobic infection.
`The placement of the films in this fashion below the
`gum line is novel to this invention and has not been
`described in previous patents devoted to antimicrobials
`
`IO
`
`is
`
`25
`
`3D
`
`35
`
`45
`
`55
`
`65
`
`Page 7
`
`Page 7
`
`

`

`4,568,535
`
`_
`
`7
`in plaque control, eg., see U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,700,685,
`4,205,061, 4,224,308 and 4,251,501.
`Mctronidazole‘saction can be counteracted by the
`presence of oxygen. As bleeding is a common finding in
`periodontitis and the oxygen contained in blood may 5
`reduce the activity of the released me'tronidazole, a
`preferred embodiment of the compositions of the inven-
`tion includes an antioxidant that is compatible with the
`formulation. For this purpose, one may use one or more
`of a wide variety of pharmaceutically-acceptable anti- 10
`oxidant agents that provide the desired oxidation reduc-
`tion potential for Optimal bactericidal action of metroni-
`dazole. Such antioxidants include agents such as ascor-
`bic acid, sodium thiosulfate, dithiothreitol, cysteine,
`thioglycollate and glutathione. Anti—oxidants that are 15
`recognized as safe for use as food additives. such as
`ascorbic acid and sodium thiosulfate, are preferred. One
`uses an amount of anti-oxidant sufficient, when the
`composition is administered to the subgingival site or
`pocket site, to enhance or maintain the anaerobic state 20
`of the site during the period of treatment. A preferred
`composition is one in which the concentration of anti-
`oxidant is in the range from about 0.1 to about 1% by
`weight of the composition. This usage of an antioxidant
`to enhance the action of metronidazole is novel to this 25
`invention.
`As indicated, the composition of the invention com-
`prises a pharmaceutically acceptable polymer that is
`solid at body temperatures. The polymer can be se-
`lected from naturally occurring and synthetic poly- 30
`meric materials and manufactured in composition forms
`-_. as inserts or containers by known methods. Thus, the
`.
`invention contemplates use of matrices compoaed of
`any of a wide variety of art-recognized polymeric mate-
`rials, such matrices and their method of manufacture 35
`being described, for example, by Shell et al. in their U.S.
`_. Pat. No. 4,304,165, incurporated herewith by reference.
`The matrix in solid form suitably is adapted for osmotic
`. release, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,303,765, or it
`may be bioerodible, such that the active components are 40
`slowly released over a prolmged period of time, for
`example, from live to 15 days. A preferred polymeric
`matrix is a solid form comprising ethylcellulose, prefer-
`ably constituting from about 79 to about 98 percent by
`weight of the composition. The solid form matrix or 45
`insert is manufactured, sized, shaped, structured and
`adapted for easy insertion and comfortable prolonged
`retention in the periodontal pocket. The matrix can
`have any geometric shape, and its dimensions can vary
`to conform to the subgingival site. The lower limit on 50
`the size of the matrix is governed by the amount of
`metronidazole to be honsed and administered to elicit
`the desired pharmacological and periodontal response,
`as well as the smallest size of matrix that can be conve-
`niently inserted and maintained in the pocket.
`Inanother aspect, the invention concerns a method of
`periodontal treatment which comprises administering
`subgingivally a composition according to the invention
`in unit dOse form within at least one periodontal pocket
`in one or more quadrants of the dentition. A preferred 60
`embodiment of the method is one where the metronida~
`zole content of the composition is in a form adapted for
`sustained release.
`
`Page 8
`
`isms such as spirochetes and black pigmented bacteroi-
`des. The invention involves the incorporation of metro-
`nidazole an antimicrobial which has a specific spectrum
`of activity against anaerobic bacteria, into an ethylcellu-
`lose film in such a way that the metronidazole is slowly
`released. The metronidazole ethylcellulose film is
`placed by the clinician directly into the periodontal
`pocket of 6 mm or more depth and left in situ for peri-
`ods of 7 to 14 days or more during which time the
`metrOnidazole is continuously released at bacteriocidal
`levels for anaerobes. This manner of application assures
`that furcation sites on molars will be exposed to thera-
`peutic levels of metronidazole. The release kinetics of
`the metronidazole can be controlled by the dimensions
`of the film and by the addition of polyethylene glycol.
`The activity of metronidazole can be enhanced by the
`usage of reducing agents.
`DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED
`EMBODIMENT
`
`The invention and best mode of practicing the same is
`given hereafter by way of example and is presented for
`the purpose of illustration, but not of limitation.
`EXAMPLE 1
`
`Sustained Release Solid Form
`
`Component
`Parts by Weight
`1 to 20
`Metronidazole
`
`
`
`Antioxidant, Ascorbic Acid 0.0 to 1.0
`Eth ] Cellulose
`e N22, NT, or N-‘lNFl' 80 to 98
`‘Manu aclured by Hercfifine. Delaware.
`The ethylcellulose is dissolved in chloroform and
`then after complete dissolution. the metronidazole and
`antioxidant are added. The restdtiug mixture is cast on
`glass plates and after evaporation of the chloroform, the
`residual film is removed from the plate. Films of vary-
`ing thickness and containing varying amounts e.g., from
`one to 20 percent, of metronidaaolc can be prepared.
`The films are to be cut to approximate the dimensions of
`the pocket (for example, 8 mm long by 3 mm wide by
`0.5 mm thick) and then placed within the pocket by the
`dentist (See FIG. 3).
`The latter film weighs about 12 mg. If metronidazole
`comprises 20 percent of this weight, then about 2.4 mg
`of metrOnidazole is added via the film to each infected
`pocket. If the patient has 20 such deep pockets, then
`about 50 mg (20X2.4 mg) of metronidazole is needed to
`treat the periodoutal infection over a 7 to 14 day period.
`This dosage is about one one-hundredth (1/ 100th) the
`dosage ofmetronidaaole currently given systemically to
`treat periodontal infections. This reduction in dosage is
`oue of the important advantages of the the present in-
`vention over the systemic route of administration.
`Other solid state polymers can be substituted in the
`composition to provide for equivalent or comparable
`sustained release of metronidazole in the pocket.
`Among these preferred are Vynathene, a soft and elas-
`tomeric vinyl acetate-ethylene copolymer and the bio-
`degradable polymer. polycaprolactone, as described in
`U.S. Pat. No. 4,304,765 (J. Dent. Res. 60:Spec. Iss.
`IADR Abstracts, p.274).
`In a modification of the invention, for faster sustained
`release, polyethylene glycol is dissolved in the chloro-
`form with the other components, so as to give a final
`coucentration of 10 percent. The 10 percent polyethyl-
`
`55
`
`SUMMARY
`The Invention describes a novel method of treating
`advanced forms of periodontal disease that are associ-
`ated with the proportional increase of anaerobic organ-
`
`65
`
`Page 8
`
`

`

`4,568,535
`
`9
`ene glycol will result in a controlled faster release of the
`metronidazole from the polymer, which is especially
`useful in the prompt treatment of active periodoatal
`infections. It should be obvious to anyone familiar with
`the art that metronidazole derivatives, such as those
`described in U.S. Pat. No.
`3,700,685 other ni-
`troimidazoles active against anaerobes, as well as other
`antimicrobial agents, such 'as chlorhexidine, fluoride,
`tetracyclines, penicillin and other compounds, could be
`incorporated singly or in various combinations in such a
`slow release device for the treatment of periodontitis.
`The above formulations may optionally include ex-
`cipient components, such self-sterilizing agents. flavou-
`ing agents, coloring or visualizing agents, and the like,
`in suitable preponion.
`When compositions of this invention are placed in the
`periodontal pocket that exhibits bleeding and high pro-
`portions of spirochetes and black pigmented bacteroi-
`des in the subgingival plaque, highly favorable results
`are observed: For purposes of clinical proof of this
`result, human subjects of widely varied age groups,
`who have active periodontitis with pockets of 6 mm or
`more, can be used. Evidence of clinical effectiveness
`can be obtained in the following manner. Patients with
`6 to 30 sites with pockets depths of 6 mm or more will
`be randomly assigned to one of two groups. Patients in
`group one will have ethylcellulose films containing
`' metronidazole placed into these deep pockets, whereas
`‘ --patients in group two will have ethylcellulose films
`without metronidazole placed within their deep pock-
`ets. The film that is designated to be placed in the
`pocket will be contoured by the clinician so that it can
`' be placed below the gingival margin, so as to occupy
`the majority of the space in the periodontal pocket (See
`- FIG. 3). Prior to placement of these films in the pocket,
`the pocket depth and attachment distance will be mea-
`snred as described previously, and an aliquot of plaque
`-will be removed for microscopic and cultural analysis.
`- The microscopic analysis will determine the numbers
`- and proportions of various spirochetes, while the cul-
`-
`_- tural analysis will determine the numbers and types of
`various black pigmented bacteroides species. The films
`- will be left in place in the pockets for one or two-week
`periods. After this time the pocket depth, attachment
`
`10
`
`15
`
`25
`
`3D
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`SD
`
`55
`
`65
`
`1|]
`distance and bacteriological measurements are re»
`peated. Reduction in pocket depth, a decrease in attach-
`ment distance and a decrease in the proportions of spi

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket