throbber
United States Patent
`
`[19]
`
`[11] Patent Number:
`
`4,713,243
`
`Schiraldi et a].
`
`'
`
`[45] Date of Patent:
`
`Dec. 15, 1987
`
`[54] BIOADHESIVE EXTRUDED FILM FOR
`INTRA-ORAL DRUG DELIVERY AND
`PR
`
`[75}
`
`Inventors: Michael T. Schiraldi. East
`Brunswick, N.J.; Martin M. Perl,
`Brooklyn‘ Nix; Howard Rubin.
`Rockaway, NJ.
`
`[73] Assignee:
`
`Johnson & Johnson products, Inc“
`New Brunswick, Nu].
`
`[21] APP]. N05 87419.)“
`
`-
`
`[22] Filed:
`
`Jun. 16, 1986
`
`Int. Cl.‘ .................... .. AGIN 59/ 10; AfilK 33/16
`{51]
`[52] U.S. Ci. .................................. .. 424/151; 424/449;
`424/435
`[58] Field of Search ................. .. 424/21, 28, 449, 435,
`424/ 151
`
`
`
`[56]
`
`References Cited
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`......................... 424K115
`4,292,299
`9/1931 Suzuki et a].
`
`4,421,738 12/ 1983 Yamigawa et a].
`..
`424/21
`4,517,173
`5/1985 Kizawa et a].
`...................... .. 424/16
`.
`.
`Puma)? Examiner—Peter F. Kulkcsky
`[57]
`ABSTRACT
`A bioadhesive extruded single or multi-layered thin
`film, especially useful in intra~oral controlled-releasing
`delivery, having a water soluble or swellable polymer
`matrix bioadhesive layer which can adhere to a wet
`mucous surface and which bioadhesive layer consists
`essentially of 40—95% by weight of a hydroxypropyl
`cellulose, 5—6096 of a homopolymer of ethylene oxide,
`{ii—10% of a water-insoluble polymer such as ethyl cellu-
`lose, propyl cellulose, polyethylene and polypropylene,
`and 2—10% of a plasticizer, said film having incorpo-
`rated therein a medicament, e. g., anesthetics, analgesics,
`anticaries agents, anti-inflammatories, antihistamines,
`antibiotics. antibacterials. fungistats, etc.
`
`9 Claims, No Drawings
`
`Dr. Reddy's - EX1014
`
`Page 1
`
`Dr. Reddy's - EX1014
`Page 1
`
`

`

`
`
`1
`
`4,713,243
`
`'
`
`BIOADHESIVE EXTRUDED FILM FOR
`INTRA-ORAL DRUG DELIVERY AND PROCESS
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`1. Field of the Invention
`
`The present invention relates to a controlled-releas-
`ing medicament-containing preparation for intra-oral
`use, and is more especially concerned with such a prep-
`aration (and the process of using it) in the form of a very
`thin extruded thermoplastic film (which can be in single
`layer or laminated multi-layer form) having at least one
`bioadhesive layer containing 40-95% of a thennOplastic
`cellulose ether and 540% of a homopolymer of ethyl-
`ene Oxide which can adhere to the mucosa of the oral
`cavity. The extruded film drug delivery system of the
`present invention, which has incorporated therein the
`medicament to be dispensed, is so thin and flexible when
`Wet as to be unobtrusive to the patient after it has been
`properly positioned and placed in the mouth.
`2. Description of the Prior Art
`Several systems have previously been described
`which pertain to the delivery of drugs into the oral
`cavity. These include:
`1. Treatment of periodontal disease with tetracycline,
`chlorhexidine or metronidazole loaded into hollow
`cellulose acetate fibers. These fibers are packed in the
`periodontal pockets and provide controlled release of
`the drug to the infected area.
`2. Cast films containing ethyl cellulose/propylene gly-
`col With cltlorhexidine or metronidazole for treat-
`ment of periodontal disease.
`3. An orthodontic appliance with a hydroxyethyl me-
`thacrylate/methyl methacrylate copolymer
`(HE-
`MA/MMA) matrix. Sodium fluoride is incorporated
`into the HEMA/MMA matrix to provide sustained
`fluoride release and enhanced anticaries activity.
`HEMA/MMA with fluoride may also be attached to
`the tooth in the form of a wafer-like tablet.
`
`films
`4. Silicone/ethyl cellulose/polyethylene glycol
`containing sodium fluoride are applied as coatings on
`orthodontic bands or in chewing gum. Controlled
`release of fluoride and anticaries activity is claimed.
`The ab0ve systems are discussed in the “The Compen-
`dium of Continuing Education" Vol VI, No. 1, January
`1985 p. 27—36 review article “Controlled Drug Deliv-
`ery: A New Means of Treatment of Dental Disease”, by
`.l. Max Goodson, D.D.S., PhD. of the Forsyth Dental
`Center. Other systems, described in GB patent applica-
`tion
`No.
`2,042,888
`and
`U.S.
`Pat.
`Nos.
`4,292,299/4,226,848 (Teijin Ltd., Japan), use combina-
`tions of cellulosic and polyacrylate polymers. The pre-
`ferred materials are hydroxypropyl cellulose (“Klucel”)
`and a copolymer of acrylic acid ("Carbopol") that is
`administered in the form of thin tablets (discs), granules
`or powder. Other polymers that might be added are
`vinyl copolymers, polysaccharides, gelatin and colla-
`gen. U.S. Pat. No. 4,517,173 (Nippon Soda Co. Ltd,
`Japan} uses various 'celIuloses in a multiwlayered non-
`extruded cast film preparatiou.
`Examples of prior art products currently on the mar-
`ket include ointments such as ORABASE“ with Benzo-
`caine (Squibb), Kenalog“ (Triamcinolone Acetonide) in
`ORABASE“ (Squibb) and Mycostatin“ (Nystatin) oint-
`ment (Squibb).
`
`2
`The prior art products and delivery systems de~
`scribed above are useful but have the following disad-
`vantages:
`Tablets, appliances, hollorav fibers are “bulky” in the
`mouth. are difficult to keep in place and inconve-
`nient to apply.
`Ethyl cellulose and/or silicone films do not adhere to
`mucosal tissue.
`Ointments (i.e., ORABASE‘} have an unpleasant feel
`and do not last very long.
`Except for ORABASE“, all the foregoing systems
`require professional application to the tooth or
`periodontal pockets.
`The bioadhesive film of the present invention alleviates
`many of the above problems. It may be applied easily by
`the consumer. It has very little or no mouthfeel. it has
`good adhesion to the mucosal
`tissues, and provides
`controlled release of the medicament.
`
`OBJECT OF THE INVENTION
`
`It is an object of this invention to provide an extruded
`film that is an effective and convenient intra—oral drug
`delivery system and method for applying and delivering
`controlled dosages of therapeutic agents into the oral
`cavity. This technology may also be extended for con-
`trolled drug delivery in skin care, gynecological appli-
`cations, wound care and like uses.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`The invention involves a pharmaceutically accept-
`able controlled-releasing medicament-containing ex-
`truded single or main-layered thin film. capable of ad-
`hering to a wet mucous surface, comprising a water
`soluble or swellable polymer matrix bioadhesive layer
`which can adhere to a wet mucous surface and which
`bioadhesive layer consists essentially of 40—95% by
`weight of hydroxypropyl cellulose 5—60% of a homo-
`polymer of ethylene oxide. 0-10% of a water-insoluble
`polymer selected from the group consisting of ethyl
`cellulose, propyl cellulose, polyethylene and polypro-
`pylene, and 240% of a plasticizer, said film having
`incorporated therein a phatmaceutically effective
`amount of said medicament.
`The present invention is directed to an extruded sin-
`gle or multi-layered laminated thin (1—10 mils or
`0.025—0.25 mm) film, composed of selected water solu-
`ble and/or insoluble polymers. Various therapeutic
`agents are incorporated into the film during manufac-
`ture which are useful for treatment of oral disorders
`(i.e., denture discomfort, caries, periodontal disease,
`aphthous ulcers, etc.).
`The extruded film of the present invention must have
`at least one bioadhesive layer, but may also have a reser-
`voir layer and/or an outer protective barrier membrane
`layer. The therapeutic agent may be incorporated into
`any or all of the layers. when properly formulated and
`fabricated, these films will adhere to wet mucosal sur-
`faces, provide a protective barrier for injured flame and
`deliver controlled/sustained dosages of medication to
`the infected areas. The film may be designed for local-
`ized drug delivery (i.e., the periodontal pocket, an aph-
`thous lesion), or may allow diffusion ofthe drug into the
`oral cavity.
`-
`An example of a non-localized system would be the
`delivery of sodium fluoride for caries prevention. A
`single or laminated film with good adhesion to the tooth
`or mucosal tissue may be employed in which the fluo-
`ride release rates may be controlled by varying film
`
`
`
`Page 2
`
`Page 2
`
`

`

`3
`solubilities and/or concentration of fluoride in a multi-
`layered film.
`An example of a localized application of medication
`would be in the treatment of aphthous lesions. A lami—
`hated two layer film with benzocaine incorporated into
`the adhesive layer would directly contact the injured
`mucosa. The outer layer would consist of non-soluble/-
`non-adhesive polymers that provide durability, protec-
`tion and directs the delivery of benzocaine toward the
`lesion.
`The film forming polymers that are useful in this
`invention are selected from pharmaceutical grade mate-
`rials, or those that are considered generally regarded as
`safe (GRAS) as food additives. They include, hydroxy-
`propyl cellulose, and polyethylene oxide homopoly-
`mers. Small amounts of other polymers, e.g., polyvinyl
`ether-maleic acid copolymers and the like may be used
`in small amounts as well, replacing a small portion of
`the other polymers. The above materials are either
`water soluble of swellable and are most useful in the
`bioadhesive layer of the film. Various non-soluble poly-
`mers may also be incorporated for modification of the
`film’s permeability properties, such as ethyl cellulose,
`propyl cellulose, polyethylene, polypropylene and car-
`boxymethylcellulose (free acid). By varying the ratios
`of the above polymers both the solubility and the adhe-
`sive properties of each layer of film may be controlled.
`Therefore, depending on the desired delivery rate, the
`type of disorder to be treated, the area to be treated and
`the medication being administered it is possible to cus—
`tom design the film by selecting and blending various
`polymers. The final film product may also be fabricated
`into flexible tapes of varied thickness and width, “spots”
`of different sizes and shapes or other pre-shaped forms.
`'The medicaments and pharmaceutical agents set forth
`in the prior art discussed above may generally be deliv-
`ered by the drug delivery system of the present inven-
`tion. Usable medicaments are those which are capable
`of withstanding the heats and pressures generated in the
`extrusion process involved in making the film of the
`present invention. Preferred medicaments include:
`Anesthetics/Analgesicsabenzocaine, dyclonine HCl,
`phenol, aspirin, phenacetin, acetaminophen, potas—
`sium nitrate, etc.
`sodium mono‘
`Anticaries Agents-sodium fluoride,
`fluorophosphate, stannous fluoride, etc.
`Anti-inflammatories-hydrocortisone acetate, triamcino-
`lone acetonide, dipotassium, glycyrrhizinate, etc.
`Antiliistaminesvchlorpheniramine maleate, ephedrine
`HCL, diphenhydrnmine HCL, etc.
`Antibiotics-Le, tetracycline, doxycycline hyclate, me-
`clocycline, minocycline, etc.
`Antibacterials-chlorhexidine, cetyl pyridinium chlo-
`ride, benzethonium chloride, dequalinium chloride,
`silver sulfadiazene, phenol, thymol, hexedine, hexeti-
`dine, alexidine, etc.
`Fungistats-nystatin, miconazole, ketoconazole, etc.
`The above are illustrative examples of therapeutic
`agents that are used to treat oral disorders. The present
`invention is not to be limited to these specific materials
`especially where it is intended to deliver drug outside of
`the oral cavity e.g. to skin where other drugs may be
`desirable.
`
`The film of the present invention has the advantage of
`being an extruded film, rather than a cast film. When a
`multi-Iayered film is involved, the different layers can
`be coextruded and then laminated together, or else each
`layer can be separately extruded one on the other, and
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`.
`
`
`
`4,713,243
`
`4
`then laminated together, so that the final multi-layered
`film is still very thin. The films of the present invention
`can be made in thicknesses of only 1—10 mils or
`0025—025 mm. The films are so thin that when placed
`in the mouth after they become wet they soon become
`unobtrusive, and hardly noticeable by most patients.
`The film must always have a bioadhesive layer,
`which enables it to adhere to wet mucosal surfaces. The
`bioadhesive layer has 40—95% of hydroxypropyl cellu-
`lose, 5-60% of a homopolymer of ethylene oxide and
`240% of a glycol plasticizer (all percents are % by
`weight).
`The Hydroxypropyl cellulose (HPC), useful for pur-
`poses of the present invention is commercially available
`from Hercules, Inc. (Wilmington, DE) under the trade-
`name KLUCEL‘. Preferred grades include Klucel MF,
`with a molecular weight around 600,000 and having a
`viscosity of 4,000-6,000 cps (Brookfield) in 2 percent
`water solutions, or Klucel HF, having a molecular
`weight around 1,000,000 and viscosity of 1500-2500 cps
`in 1 percent water solution. In general, any HPC having
`a Molecular Weight above about 100,000 is useful for
`purposes of this invention.
`The homopolyrner of ethylene oxide useful for pur-
`poses of the present invention has a relatively high
`molecular weight,
`i.e., above 100,000 and preferably
`above 3,000,000. Such polymers are commercially
`available from various sources. The Union Carbide
`Corporation material, “Polpo WSR—301", which has a
`molecular weight of approximately 4,000,000-5,000,000
`is most preferred for purposes of the present invention.
`The “plasticizer” useful for purposes of the present
`invention are selected from glycols such as propylene
`glycol and polyethylene glycol; polyhydric alcohols
`such as glycerin and sorbitol; glycerol esters such as
`glycerol
`triacetate;
`fatty acid triglycerides such as
`NEOBEE“ M-5 and MYVEROLS‘; mineral oil; vege-
`table oils such as castor oil, etc.
`For the uses for the present invention contemplated
`here, the plasticizer should be non—toxic. The purpose of
`the plasticizer is to improve polymer melt processing by
`reducing the polymer melt viscosity and to impart flexi-
`bility to the final product.
`The preferred .plasticizer for use in the present inven-
`tion is either propylene glycol or polyethylene glycol
`(such as is available from Union Carbide Corporation as
`their series of Carbowaxes which runs from 200 to 600
`molecular weight, of which we prefer to use Carbowax
`400, which has a molecular weight of 400, average.
`In addition to the polymers and plasticizer which are
`required ingredients of the films of the present inven-
`tion, minor amounts of other non-essential but custom-'
`aty ingredients will often be used if desired, e.g., antiox-
`idants, preservatives, flavors, colorants.
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION
`
`The following examples will serve to illustrate the
`present invention in greater detail. The units shown in
`the examples are parts by weight. The thickness of the
`layers is expressed in either mils (0.001 inches) or milli-
`meters. For easy cOnversion, 4 mils is approximately
`equal to 0.1 mm.
`
`EXAMPLE 1
`
`_ Triple Layered Laminate Containing Sodium Fluo-
`ride for Anticaries Protection
`This three layered film laminate is comprised of a
`“bioadhesive” layer, a sodium fluoride “reservoir”
`
`Page 3
`
`
`
`Page 3
`
`

`

`4,713,243
`
`
`
` 6
`
`continued
`
`185
`Die Zone I
`185
`Die Zone 2
`
`Die Zone 3 135
`
`Each layer is extruded separately with the first layer
`extruded as a “free film". SucceSSive layers are extruded
`Onto each other and laminated by passing them through
`heated stainless steel rollers.
`Test Results:
`In vitro fluoride ion release studies were conducted
`
`an samples of the above described triple laminate film
`measuring 0.5 crnX 1.25 cm (0.625 cml) according to
`the following procedures:
`The test sample is adhered to a glass slide by prewet-
`ting the film and placing the bioadhesive layer on the
`glass surface. The slide is then immersed in a beaker
`containing l00 ml of distilled water with continuous
`stirring. Five milliliter aliquots are withdrawn from the
`solution, at prescribed time intervals, and analyzed for‘
`fluoride content with an Orion Ionanlyzer equipped
`with a fluoride specific electrode. Release rates are then
`calculated from the data.
`The results obtained indicated fluoride release rates in
`the order of 005-02 mgs/cmZ/hr for 24 hours. This
`falls within the desired range for maintaining constant
`low levels of fluoride in the mouth and enhanced anti-
`caries activity. Release rates may be tailored to desired
`use levels by modification of the film composition and
`construction.
`
`EXAMPLE 2
`
`Single Layer Adhesive Film Containing Hydrocorti-
`sone Acetate (0.5%) As An Anti-Inflammatory Agent
`The composition of the film, which was 0.1 mm.
`thick, was as follows:
`
`Ingredients
`9:: w/w
`Ethylene Oxide Homopolymer
`59.4
`(Polyox‘ WSR—JOI)
`Hydroxypropyl Cellulose
`(Klucel‘ MF)
`Polyethylene (AC-6A)
`Propylene Glycol
`Polyethylene Glycol 400
`Butylaled Hydroxy Toluene (BHT)
`FCC (preservative)
`0.5
`Hydrocortisone Acetate
`[00.0
`
`5.0
`3.0
`2.0
`0.1
`
`30.0
`
`The powder blending process and extruder conditions
`used were the same as those described in Example I for
`the "bioadhesive layer" of the sodium fluoride trilami-
`nate. In vitro tests were performed on the above film
`and demonstrated a prolonged drug release pattern.
`EXAMPLE 3
`
`Single Layer Adhesive Film Containing Triamcino-
`lone Acetonide (0.1%) As An Anti-Inflammatory
`The composition of the film. which was 0.1 mm.
`thick, was as follows:
`
` Ingredients % wr'w
`
`Ethylene Oxide Homopolymer
`59.9
`(Polyox WSR-JUI)
`Hydroitypropyl Cellulose
`(Klucel MF)
`
`29.9
`
`ID
`
`is
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`The prooesa used to make the above laminate was:
`3. Powder Blending-Each layer is made soparately and
`all ingredients used therein except propylene glycol
`and Neobee M-S (liquid plasticizers) are placed in 21
`Patterson Kelley (PK) V-blender equipped with liq-
`uid addition capabilities. The ingredients which are
`all powders are blended for approximately 10-15
`minutes while the liquid plasticizer is slowly added to
`the mix. Three separate powder blends are made, one
`for each layer.
`b. Extrusion Process-A standard Johnson 2-; inch vi-
`nyl/polyolefin extruder equipped with a single three
`stage screw was used to extrude the “powder blend”.
`The temperature conditions for the water soluble
`powders are however quite different from those used
`for vinyls and polyolefins. The temperature CC.)
`profile for the "reservoir" and “membrane layers” of
`the triple laminate was as follows:
`
`Barrel Zone I
`[00
`Barrel Zone 2
`us
`Barrel Zone 3
`135
`Barrel Zone ‘3
`145
`Barrel Zone 5
`160
`Barrel Zone 6
`ill]
`Adapter
`130
`Die Zone 1
`180
`Die Zone 2
`180
`
`Die Zone 3 I30
`
`The films which had a width of 18 inches, were ex-
`truded at approximately 20 feet/minute through a flat
`lipped die. The temperature profile for the “bioadhesive
`layer" was:
`
`Barrel Zone 1
`I25
`Barrel Zone 2
`I40
`Barrel Zone 3
`165
`Barrel Zone 4
`I‘ll)
`Barrel Zone 5
`135
`Barrel Zone 6
`135
`Adapter
`[35
`
`5
`layer and, an “outer protective barrier membrane”
`layer, in which the composition and thickness of each
`layer are as shown below:
`
`Outer
`Protective
`Barrier
`% w/w
`Bio-
`Reservoir Membrane
`adhesive
`Layer
`Layer
`Layer
`(4 mils)
`{l mil)
`(1 mil)
`
`Ingredients
`(0.l mm}
`(0.025 mm)
`(0.025 mm)
`Polyethylene oxide
`60.0
`—
`—
`homopolymer (Union
`Carbide-Polyox' WSR—ifll)
`Hydroxypropyl Cellulose
`(Hercules. inc-Klucel‘ MFJ
`Polyethylene (Allied
`Chemical-6A)
`(Low Density)
`Propylene Glycol, U.S.P.
`Polyethylene Glycol
`400 (Union Carbide)
`Ethyl Cellulose (Hercules,
`Inc-hilij
`Caprylichapric
`Triglyceride (PVO
`Incorporated-Neobee Md)
`
`list)
`—
`Sodium Fluoride. U.S.P.
`0.4
`
`
`100.0100.0 100.0
`
`30.0
`
`5.0
`
`3.0
`2.0
`
`-
`
`—
`
`20.0
`
`24.0
`
`—
`
`—
`—
`
`59.0
`
`5.0
`
`—
`
`—
`—
`
`69.6
`
`6.0
`
`
`
`Page 4
`
`

`

`4,713,243
`
`-continued
`____—_-—————-
`_._._.—__._————-——
`Ingredients
`9‘5 wr’w
`Polyethylene (AC-6A)
`5.0
`Propylene Glycol
`3.0
`Polyethylene Glycol 400
`2.0
`BHT
`0.1
`
`0.1
`Triarncinolone Aoetonide
`100.0
`
`5
`
`The powder blending process and extruder conditions 10
`used to make the film of this Example 3 were the same
`as those of the “bioedhesive layer” of Example 1.
`Other desired active medicament ingredients may be
`incorporated into the adhesive films of any of Examples 15
`1-3 in place of the particular medicament used in said
`examples. These include Benzooaine (analgesic), Potas-
`sium nitrate (analgesic), Silver sulfadiazene (antimicro-
`bial),
`Chlorhexidine (antimicrobial), miconazole nitrate 20
`(antifungal), Benzethonium chloride (antimicrobial),
`Tetracycline (antibiotic) and other similar therapeutic
`compounds.
`
`EXAMPLE 4
`Analgesic Films with Potassium Nitrate
`This example shows 5 variations of the film having
`different solubilities, resulting in different release rates.
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`
`-continued
`100.00
`
`B.
`
`Outer protective/barrier layer
`Hydrorypropyi Cellulose
`(Klucel‘I MF)
`Ethyl Cellulose
`20.00
`
`Polyethylene Glycol 400
`2.00
`100.00
`
`78.00
`
`Part A was extruded on a Johnson extruder followed by
`subsequent extrusion and lamination of Part B to A.
`Samples were applied to oral lesions, and provided
`profound anesthetic effects
`(lasting several hours)
`within minutes of application.
`The identical two-layer laminate may also be made
`by coextruding the inner medicated bioadhesive layer
`(Part A) and the outer protective barrier layer (Part B)
`through separate die slots within a coextruder and lami-
`nating the two layers together.
`EXAMPLE 6
`
`Anesthetic Films with Phenol and Dyclonine HCl
`Four variations of a single layer bioadhesive film
`were made as shown below:
`
` Ingredients i 2 3 4
`
`
`
`
`Polyethylene oxide homo-
`59.10
`54.00
`59.?0
`58.20
`polymer (Polycr‘ WSRJGI)
`Hydroxypropyl Cellulose
`(KluceI HF)
`4.85
`4.98
`4.50
`4.93
`Ethyl Cellulose
`2.91
`2.99
`2.70
`1.96
`Propylene Glycol, U.S.P.
`1.94
`1.99
`1.80
`1.9?
`Polyethylene Glycol 4-00
`0.l0
`0.09
`0.09
`0.09
`BHT. F.C.C.
`—
`-—
`—
`1.50
`Phenol, U.S.P.
`
`Dyclonine HCI 3.00 - 10.00 0.50
`
`
`
`
`29.45
`
`26.9]
`
`29.75
`
`29.00
`
`Following the procedures for the bioadhesive layer of
`Example I, the powders were blended in P-K blender
`equipped with liquid addition capabilities. Resulting
`powders were extruded on a Killian laboratory-sized
`extruder.
`
`EXAMPLE 7
`
`Silver Sulfadiazene Films-Antimicrobial
`Three different single-layered bioadhesive films con-
`taining 1.0% 0.5% and 0.5% respectively of silver sul-
`fadiazene (SSD) were prepared on a heated Carver
`laboratory press (designed to simulate extruded condi-
`tions) as shown below.
`
`% W/w
`
`A
`60.00
`
`23.9
`
`Ingredients
`Polyethylene oxide homopolymer
`(Polyox‘ WEE-301)
`Hydroxypropyl Cellulose
`(Klucel‘ HF)
`Polyethylene (AC-6A)
`5.0
`5.0
`Propylene Glycol, U.S.P.
`3.0
`3.0
`Polyethylene Glycol 400
`2.0
`2.0
`BHT. F.C.C.
`0.1
`0.1
`
`Silver Suiladiazine
`1.0
`0.5
`
`HIM:| 153.0
`
`B
`60.00
`
`29.4
`
`Effects on wound repair and activity against Staphylo-
`coccus auraus were evaluated in the guinea pig model.
`Full-thickness excisions were inoculated with 3.8X105
`organism, (Staph. duress) and wound surface microbi-
`
`- Page 5
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`23.75
`
`2
`5100
`
`96 w/w
`3
`55.00
`
`4
`55.00
`
`S
`57.00
`
`‘
`
`.
`"Ingredients
`Polyethylene oxide
`homopolymer (Polyox‘
`WSR—Jfll}
`Hydroxypropyl Cell-
`--ulose, N.F. (Klucel‘ HID
`Hydroxypropyl Cell-
`ulose. N.F. (Klucei' MF)
`"Ethyl Cellulose
`‘lPoiyethylene GlycoHOO
`.mPolyerhylene Glycol 8000
`Propylene Glycol. U.S.P.
`BHT, F.C.C.
`Potassium Nitrate. F.C.C.
`
`68.30 —
`
`—
`
`—
`
`——
`
`—
`
`28.40
`
`29.90
`
`22.40
`
`22.40
`
`4.75
`1.90
`1.90
`0.95 —
`—
`2.85
`0.l0
`0.!0
`5.00
`5.00
`
`5.00
`2.00
`—
`3J1!)
`0.10
`5.00
`
`12.50
`2.00
`_
`3.00
`0.10
`5.00
`
`12.50
`2.00
`_
`3.00
`0.03
`3.00
`
`The above ingredients are blended in a Patterson-Kelly
`powder blender equipped with liquid addition capabili-
`ties. The resulting powder blend is then extruded into
`film on a Killion or Johnson vinyl extruder using pro-
`cessing procedures similar to those of the bioadhesive 50
`layer of Emnple 1.
`
`EXAMPLE 5
`
`Anesthetic Films with Benzocaine (Laminate)
`This is an example of a two-layer laminate. The pro- 55
`cessng conditions used were similar to those of the
`bioadhesive layer and outer protective barrier mem~
`brane layer of Example I.
`
`
`A-
`
`Polyonyethylene Homopolyrner
`(Polyott‘ “(SR-301)
`Hydroxypropyi Cellulose. NF.
`(Klucei' MF)
`Polyethylene (AC-6A)
`Propylene Glycol. {LS-P.
`Polyethylene Glycol 400
`BHT. F.C.C.
`Benzocaine, U.S.P.
`
`5"
`
`65
`
`57.00
`
`28.40
`
`4.75
`2.35
`1.90
`0.10
`5.00
`
`
`
`Page 5
`
`

`

`
`
`4,713,243
`
`9
`ology samples taken 10 minutes and 24 hours after treat-
`ment. Test films were placed on the wound and covered
`with BIOCLUSIVE“ Transparent Dressings secured
`with elastic tape. Wound contraction was measured
`Over an eight-day period using 0FTOMAX‘ Comput—
`er—Assisted Image Analysis. The three films tested were
`the following:
`A. 1.0% Silver Sulfadiazene, 125“ 0/2 minutes/4 tons
`B. 0.5% Silver Sulfadiazene, 125° C./2 minutes/4 tons
`C. 0.5% Silver Sulfadiazene, 150° C./3 minutes/4 tons
`SILVADENE Cream and an untreated occluded
`control. The results indicated that:
`l. SILVADENE‘ treated wounds significantly inhib-
`ited full-thickness wound contraction.
`2. Film A, B and C inhibited wound contraction relative
`to that of BIOCLUSIVE‘ dressed wounds.
`
`3. The three SSD films each permitted substantially
`faster wound contraction than that of wounds treated
`daily with SILVADENB‘ cream.
`4. All films were very active against S. aureus 24 hours
`after inoculation.
`
`The films may be scaled up by using an extruder. This
`example demonstrates the feasibility of such a film to
`perform its intended purpose. Use of a press for larger
`samples would result in a non-uniform and lower-qual-
`ity film than an extruded film.
`Based on the above findings, the films were very
`effective antibacterial agents, while mildly inhibiting
`wound contraction. They offer clinicians a convenient
`and more effective delivery system for antimicrobials
`which can be place in wounds beneath any dressing or
`can be laminated to any acceptable dressing face.
`What is claimed is:
`
`l. A pharmaceutically acceptable controlled-releas-
`ing medicament-containing extruded single or multi-
`layered thin film, capable of adhering to a wet mucous
`surface, comprising a water soluble or swellable poly-
`mer matrix bioadhesive layer which can adhere to a wet
`mucous surface and which bioadhesive layer consists
`essentially of 40—95% by weight of a hydroxypmpyl
`cellulose having a molecular weight above 100,000,
`5—60% of a homepolymer of ethylene oxide having a
`molecular weight from 3,000,000 to 5,000,000, 040%
`of a water-insoluble polymer selected from the group
`consisting of ethyl cellulose, propyl cellulose, polyeth-
`ylene and polypropylene, and 2-10% of a plasticizer,
`said film having incorporated therein a pharmaceuti-
`cally effective amount of said medicament.
`2. The extruded film of claim 1, made in a form which
`is so thin and flexible when wet as to be unobtrusive to
`the patient when properly positioned and placed in the
`patients mouth.
`
`[0
`
`I5
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`10
`3. The extruded film of claim 2 having a thickness no
`greater than 0.25 millimeters.
`4. The extruded film of claim 1, in single layer form,
`which also contains up to 10% by weight of a non-solu-
`ble polymer selected from the group consisting of ethyl
`cellulose, polyethylene, polypropylene and carboxy-
`methyl cellulose free acid.
`5. The extruded film of claim 1, in multi-layer lami-
`nated form, which is addition to the bioadhesive layer
`also contains a reservoir layer in which at least a major
`portion of the medicament is contained.
`6. The extruded multi-layer film of claim 5 in which
`the reservoir layer consists essentially of a polymer
`matrix comprised of both a water soluble or swellable
`polymer and a non-water soluble polymer selected from
`the group consisting of ethyl cellulose, propyi cellulose,
`polyethylene and polypropylene, and also hydroxypro-
`pyl cellulose.
`'l. The extruded film of claim 1 in multi-layer lami-
`nated form, which in addition to the bioadhesive layer
`also contains an outer protective-barrier membrane
`layer.
`8. The extruded multi-layer film of claim 7 in which
`the outer protective-barrier membrane layer is thinner
`than the bioadhesive layer, and said outer protective
`barrier layer consists essentially of a polymer matrix of
`a major proportion of a non-water-soluble polymer
`selected from the group consisting of ethyl cellulose,
`propyi cellulose, polyethylene and polypropylene, and
`a minor proportion of hydroxypropyl cellulose.
`9. The extruded multi-layer film of claim 1 in the
`form of a triple layered laminate containing sodium
`fluoride for anticaries protection having the following
`composition:
`
`Outer
`Protective
`Barrier
`95 wfiw
`Bio-
`Reservoir Membrane
`adhesive
`Layer
`Layer
`Layer
`
`Ingredients
`(0.1 mm)
`(0.025 mm)
`(0.025 mm)
`Polyethylene oxide
`60.0
`—
`—
`homopolyrner
`(MW 3,000,000 minimum)
`Hydroxypropyl Cellulose
`(MW £000,000}
`Polyethylene (Low Density)
`Propylene Glycol, USP.
`Polyethylene Glycol
`(MW 400)
`Ethyl Cellulose
`69.6
`59.0
`CaprylicKCapric
`5.0
`6.0
`Triglyceride
`
`—
`Sodium Fluoride
`[6.0
`0.4
`
`
`100.0100.0 [03.0
`
`20.0
`
`—
`—
`—
`
`24.0
`
`-_
`—
`—
`
`30.0
`
`5.0
`3.0
`2.0
`
`—
`—
`
`
`
`Page 6
`
`Page 6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket