throbber
119)
`United States Patent
`5,595,980
`(11) Patent Number:
`
`[45] Date of Patent: Jan. 21, 1997
`Brodeetal.
`
`ACAA
`
`US00559
`
`(54)
`
`CONTRACEPTIVE COMPOSITIONS
`
`[75]
`
`Inventors: George L. Brode, Bridgewater, N.J.;
`Gustavo F. Doncel, Norfolk, Va.;
`Henry L. Gabelnick, N. Bethesda,
`Md.; Russell L. Kreeger, Flemington;
`.
`8/1986 European Pat. Off.
`0189935
`George A. Salensky, White House
`2078110==1/1982 United Kingdom .
`Station, both of N.J.
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`4,707,362 11/1987 NUWAYSET sss 424/433
`4,845,175
`7/1989 LO...
`wee 326/200
`4,929,722
`5/1990 Partain et ALL secserersnrvecvevntseee 536/20
`4,946,870
`8/1990 Partain et al. wees SLA/777
`
`
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`(73]
`
`[21]
`
`[22]
`
`[63]
`
`(51)
`(52]
`
`[58]
`
`[56]
`
`Assignees: Medical College of Hampton Roads,
`Arlington, Va.; Biomaterials
`Corporation, Plainsboro, N.J.
`
`Appl. No.: 418,884
`
`Filed:
`
`Apr. 7, 1995
`
`Related U.S. Application Data
`
`Continuation of Ser. No. 129,253, Sep. 29, 1993, abandoned.
`
`Baits CU.
`ssscscesssssessosssesssssssssssessssss
`. AGIK 31/72
`U.S. Cl.....
`a "514/57;514/59; 514/55;
`
`514/814;514/843; 514/935; 514/944; 514/945;
`536/44; 536/55.1; 536/99; 424/DIG. 14
`
`Field of Search .
`. 514/814, 843,
`514/55,57,59,935,“944, 945; 536/99,
`44, 55.1; 424/DIG. 14
`
`References Cited
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`4,228,277 10/1980 Landoll.....
`5/1983 Kazmiroski etal
`4,242,359 12/1980 Cooper etal. ....
`4,284,003
`
`424/329
`3/1982 Saurino .........00
`4,321,277
`
`424/180
`6/1983 Bagros ..
`4,387,094
`424/180
`7/1984 Maltz ....
`4,459,289
`4,474,769 10/1984 Smith ........
`1. 424/180
`
`4,551,148 11/1985 Riley et al.
`“
`...
`4,663,159
`5/1987 Brode ct al.
`scesssssensesnscnsesseun
`
`The Effects of Frequent Nonoxynol-9 Use On The Vaginal
`and Cervical Mucosa Somchai Niruthisard, MD etal., pp.
`176-179, 1991.
`Comparison of Vaginal Tolerance Test of Spermicidal Prepa-
`rations in Rabbits and Monkeys P. Eckstein etal., pp. 85-93,
`1969.
`HEC Cellosize Hydroxyethyl Cellulose-Union Carbide
`Corporation, pp. 1-32, 1991.
`
`Primary Examiner—Michael G. Wityshyn
`Assistant Examiner—Francisco C. Prats
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Banner & Witcoff Ltd.
`
`[57]
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`Improved contraceptive compositions are disclosed which
`comprise a spermicide or virucide, a polymeric delivery
`component and optionally a cosmetic ingredient. The
`improvementis directed to the use of certain hydrophobi-
`cally modified polysaccharides as the polymeric delivery
`component. Quite advantageously,
`the hydrophobically
`modified polysaccharides of the present invention can alter
`sperm motility. Moreover,
`the hydrophobically modified
`polysaccharides can provide reduced irritation potential
`when used in combination with spermicides such as, for
`example, nonoxynol-9, which may reduce the potential for
`infection of sexually transmitted diseases such as HIV and
`herpes.
`
`8 Claims, No Drawings
`
`Dr. Reddy's - EX1009
`Page 1
`
`Dr. Reddy's - EX1009
`Page 1
`
`

`

`5,595,980
`
`1
`CONTRACEPTIVE COMPOSITIONS
`
`This invention was made with government support under
`Cooperative Agreement DPE-3044-A-00-6063-00 between
`the United States Agency for International Development and
`the Medical College of Hampton Roads. The government
`has certain rights in this invention.
`This application is a continuation of application Ser. No.
`08/129,253, filed Sep. 29, 1993, now abandoned.
`
`FIELD OF THE INVENTION
`
`Thepeesent invention generally relates to contraceptive
`
`positions, and more specifically relates to improved
`
`give compositions comprising certain hydrophobi-
`
`caliy-medified polysaccharides as polymeric delivery com-
`ponents.
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`Contraceptive compositions typically comprise an active
`ingredient, such as, for example, nonoxynol-9, a polymeric
`delivery component for delivering the active ingredient,
`such as, for example, hydroxyethyl cellulose or carboxym-
`ethyl cellulose, cosmetic ingredients, such as, for example,
`water, sorbitol and propylene glycol, and optionally other
`ingredients, such as, for example, stabilizers, fragrances,
`viscosity adjusters, and the like.
`One importantattribute of contraceptive compositions is
`that the active ingredients should be effective as a spermi-
`cide, In addition, the other ingredients present in the con-
`traceptive compositions should not interfere with the effec-
`tiveness
`of
`the
`active
`ingredient. Many
`existing
`contraceptive compositions possess these properties. How-
`ever, such existing contraceptive compositions typically do
`not have a high degree of substantivity to the mucosal lining
`of the vagina. Moreover, existing polymeric delivery com-
`ponents generally do not provide any functional effect with
`respect to altering sperm motility.
`Spermicides such as nonoxynol-9 and benzalkonium
`chloride have been used effectively as active ingredients in
`contraceptive compositions for many years. However,it has
`been found that such ingredients can be irritating to the
`mucosal lining of the vagina and cause an increased risk of
`vaginal irritation. Along with such increasedrisksof vaginal
`irritation, there may be increased risks of contracting sexu-
`ally transmitted diseases of bacterial, fungal or viral origin,
`such as, for example, HIV and herpes.
`Accordingly, improved contraceptive compositions are
`desired which are substantive and which can provide a low
`degree ofirritation to the mucosal lining of the vagina. In
`addition, improved contraceptive compositions are desired
`wherein polymeric delivery components are provided which
`can alter sperm motility.
`
`SUMMARYOF THE INVENTION
`
`In accordance with the present invention, improved con-
`traceptive compositions comprising a spermicide or viru-
`cide, a polymeric delivery component for the spermicide or
`virucide and cosmetic ingredients are provided wherein the
`polymeric delivery component comprises a hydrophobically
`modified polysaccharide. By virtue of the present invention
`it is now possible to provide contraceptive compositions
`wherein the polymeric delivery component can enhance
`effectiveness of the spermicide. As a result, the overall
`spermicidal effectiveness of the contraceptive compositions
`
`10
`
`20
`
`35
`
`50
`
`55
`
`2
`can be improved. In addition, the improved contraceptive
`compositions ofthe present invention are substantive to the
`mucosal lining of the vagina and can provide a reduced
`degree of vaginal
`irritation which may lower the risk of
`contracting sexually transmitted diseases.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`INVENTION
`
`The contraceptive compositions of the present invention
`are suitable for use in mammals. As used herein, the term
`“mammals” means any class of higher vertebrates that
`nourish their young with milk secreted by mammary glands,
`e.g., humans, rabbits and monkeys.
`The spermicides useful in accordance with the present
`invention are known to those skilled in the art. Typical
`spermicides include, for example, benzalkonium chloride,
`octoxynol-9, ricinoleic acid, phenol mercuric acetates and
`nonoxynol-9, etc. Nonoxynol-9 and benzalkonium chloride
`are preferred spermicides for use in accordance with the
`present invention.
`The virucides suitable for use in the contraceptive com-
`positionsof the present invention are knownto thoseskilled
`in the art. Typical virucides include, for example, acyclovir,
`idoxyurnidine,
`ribavirin, nonoxynol-9, vidarabine
`and
`rimantadine.
`
`the contraceptive compositions of the present
`Thus,
`invention may typically comprise one or more spermicide or
`one or more virucide or both. Some ingredients such as, for
`example, nonoxynol-9, may function both as spermicide and
`virucide.
`
`Thetotal amount of spermicide and virucide, or mixtures
`thereof, will typically range from about 0.1 to 50 weight
`percent based on the weight of the contraceptive composi-
`tion. Preferably,
`the amount of spermicide or virucide
`employed will be that amount necessary to achieve the
`desired spermicidal or virucidal
`results. Appropriate
`amounts can be determined by those skilled in the art.
`Preferably,
`the total concentration of the spermicide or
`virucide, or mixtures thereof, will comprise from about1 to
`25 weight percent, and more preferably from about 1 to 5
`weight percent, based on the weight of the contraceptive
`composition.
`The polymeric delivery componentssuitable for use in the
`contraceptive compositions of the present invention com-
`prise one or more hydrophobically modified polysaccharides
`selected from the group consisting of cellulosics and chito-
`sans. Such polysaccharidestarting materials from which the
`hydrophobically modified polysaccharides of the present
`invention can be made are known to those skilled in the art.
`Typical cellulosics include, for example, hydroxyethyl cel-
`lulose, hydroxypropyl] cellulose, methy] cellulose, hydrox-
`ypropylmethyl cellulose, hydroxyethyl methyl cellulose,
`and the like. Preferred cellulosics include hydroxyethyl
`cellulose and hydroxypropyl cellulose. Typical chitosans —
`include, for example, the following chitosan salts; chitosan
`lactate, chitosan salicylate, chitosan pyrrolidone carboxy-
`late, chitosan itaconate, chitosan niacinate, chitosan formate,
`chitosan acetate, chitosan gallate, chitosan glutamate, chi-
`tosan maleate, chitosan aspartate, chitosan glycolate and
`quaternary amine substituted chitosan and salts thereof,etc.
`Chitosan lactate and chitosan pyrrolidone carboxylate and
`are preferred chitosans. The polymeric delivery component
`may comprise mixtures of polysaccharides between classes
`of the group,e.g,, cellulosics and chitosans,or within a class,
`e.g., two cellulosics.
`
`Page 2
`
`Page 2
`
`

`

`5,995,980
`
`3
`The hydrophobically modified polysaccharides of the
`present invention comprise a hydrophobic substituent con-
`taining a hydrocarbon group having from about 8 to 18
`carbon atoms, preferably from about 10 to 18 carbon atoms
`and more preferably from about 12 to 15 carbon atoms. The
`hydrocarbon group of the hydrophobic substituent may
`comprise an alkyl or arylalkyl configuration. As used herein
`the term “arylalkyl group” means a group containing both
`aromatic and aliphatic structures. Procedures for hydropho-
`bically modifying the above mentioned polysaccharides are
`knownto those skilled in the art. See, for example, U.S. Pat.
`Nos. 4,228,277 issued Oct. 14, 1980 and 4,663,159 issued
`May5, 1987.
`The degree of substitution of the hydrophobic substituent
`on the polysaccharide is typically from about 0.05 to 0.5,
`preferably from about 0.08 to 0.25, more preferably 0.08 to
`0.16 and most preferably from greater than about 0.11, e.g.,
`0.12, to less than 0.16, e.g., 0.15, moles of the hydrophobic
`substituent per mole of polysaccharide. The hydrophobic
`substituent may be anionic, cationic, nonionic or amphot-
`eric. More than one particular hydrophobic substituent can
`be substituted onto the polysaccharide provided that the total
`substitution level] is within the ranges set forth above.
`A preferred hydrophobic substituent is a cationic, quater-
`nary, nitrogen-containing radical having the formula:
`
`R,
`
`RoHOR (Ai?)
`R3
`
`wherein:
`
`each R, and R, are CH, or C,H;
`R, is CH,CHOHCH,or CH,CH,;
`R, is an alkyl or arylalkyl group having about 8 to 18
`carbon atoms; and
`A, is a halide ion.
`Preferably, R, and more preferably, both R, and R, are
`CH,. Preferably, R, is CH,CHOHCH,. Preferably, R, is
`C,H(2n+1), where n is from 8 to 18. An especially preferred
`hydrophobicgroup,i.e., Ry, has the formula C,,H,,. Chlo-
`rine is a preferred halide ion.
`Other preferred hydrophobic substituents include those
`prepared from hydrophobe containing reagents such as
`glycidyl ethers, e.g., nonylphenylglycidyl ether or dode-
`cylphenylglycidyl ether, alphaolefin epoxides, e.g., 1,2
`epoxy hexadecane andtheir respective chlorohydrins, alkyl
`halides, e.g., dodecylbromide, and mixtures thereof.
`The ionic character of the hydrophobically modified
`polysaccharides of the present invention is not critical and
`can be anionic, cationic, nonionic or amphoteric. However,
`cationic polysaccharides are preferred for use in accordance
`with the present invention. Thus, in a preferred aspect ofthe
`invention, the polysaccharides are also substituted with an
`ionic substituent in addition to the hydrophobic substituent.
`The amountoficnic substituent typically ranges from about
`0.05 to 0.9, preferably from 0.10 to 0.25, moles of the ionic
`substituent per mole of the polysaccharide for cellulosics
`and preferably from about 0.5 to 0.9 moles of the ionic
`substituent per mole of the polysaccharide for chitosan
`derivatives. More than one particular ionic substituent can
`be substituted onto the polysaccharide providedthat the total
`substitution level is within the ranges set forth above.
`A preferred cationic substituent for cellulosics is a cat-
`ionic quaternary nitrogen containing radical having the
`formula:
`
`4
`
`*
`Ro“WOR [A2®]
`Ry
`
`10
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`wherein
`
`each R,, R, and R, are CH, or C,H,;
`R, is CH, CHOHCH, or CH,CH,; and
`Azis a halide ion.
`Preferably, at
`least one of R;, Rg and R, are CH.
`Preferably R, is CH,CHOHCH,,.Preferably, A, is a chloride
`anion,
`
`A preferred cationic substituent for chitosans is an ammo-
`nium group containing radical having the formula:
`
`NH,@ A,®
`
`wherein A, is an organic acid counter ion. Preferably, A, is
`lactate pyrrolidone carboxylate, acetate or combinations
`thereof.
`In addition to the above described hydrophobically modi-
`fied polysaccharides, the contraceptive compositions may
`contain other polysaccharides, or deriyatives thereof, such
`as,
`for example; hydroxyethyl celiufose, carboxymethyl
`cellulose, dextran sulfate and hyaluronic acid. Such other
`polysaccharides may or may not be hycrophobically modi-
`fied. Such other polysaccharides, when present in the com-
`position, may comprise from about 0.1 to 25%, based on the
`weight of the contraceptive compositions. One preferred
`contraceptive composition in accordance with the present
`invention comprises a cationic hydrophobically modified
`hydroxyethyl cellulose in combination with chitosan lactate
`as the polymeric delivery component.
`Preferably, the hydrophobically modified polysaccharides
`of the present invention are water soluble. As used herein,
`the term “water soluble” means that at least
`1 gram and
`preferably at least 2 grams of the hydrophobically modified
`polysaccharideare soluble in 100 gramsofdistilled water at
`25° C. and 1 atmosphere. The degree of water solubility can
`be controlled by varying the amount of ether substitution,
`hydrophobe substitution and cation substitution on the
`polysaccharide,
`the details of which are known to those
`skilled in the art.
`The molecular weight of the polysaccharides suitable for
`use in accordance with the presentinvention typically ranges
`from about 10,000 to 500,000 grams per gram mole and
`preferably ranges from about 20,000 to 200,000 grams per
`gram mole. As used herein, the term “molecular weight”
`means weight average molecular weight. Methodsfor deter-
`mining weight average molecular weight of polysaccharides
`are knownto those skilled in the art. One preferred method
`for determining molecular weight is low angle laser light
`scattering. The viscosity of the polysaccharides typically
`ranges from about 5 to 5000 centipoise, preferably from
`about 10 to 500 centipoise. Unless otherwise indicated, as
`used herein the term “viscosity” refers to the viscosity of a
`2.0 weight percent aqueous solution of the polymer mea-
`sured at 25° C. with a Brookfield viscometer. Such viscosity
`measuring techniques are knownto those skilled in the art.
`Typically, the amount of the polymeric delivery compo-
`nent will range from about 0.1 to 99.9 weight percent,
`preferably, from about 0.5 to 50 weight percent and more
`preferably from about 1 to 10 weight percent, based on the
`weight on the contraceptive composition.
`The balance of the contraceptive compositions of the
`presentinvention,i.e., typically from about 0.1 to 99.8% and
`
`Page 3
`
`Page 3
`
`

`

`5,595,980
`
`5
`often about 50 to 99.8 weight percent, may optionally
`comprise one or more cosmetic ingredients. Such cosmetic
`ingredients are known to those skilled in the art and are often
`referred to in the art as diluents, solvents and adjuvants.
`Typically cosmetic ingredients include, for example; water,
`ethyl alcohol, isopropyl alcohol, glycerin, glycerol propy-
`lene glycol, sorbitol and other high molecular weight alco-
`hols. In addition, contraceptive compositions of the present
`invention may contain minor amounts, e.g. from about 0.1 to
`5% weight based on the weight of the contraceptive com-
`positions, of other additives, such as, for example; stabiliz-
`ers, surfactants, menthol, eucalyptusoil, other essential oils,
`fragrances, and the like. Polyoxyethylene 20osorbitan
`monolaurate is a preferred stablizer for use in the compo-
`sitions of the present invention. In fact, in accordance with
`the present invention, it is believed that certain stabilizers,
`such as, for example, polyoxyethylene 20-sorbitan mono-
`laurate, may contribute to the sperm blocking properties of
`the hydrophobically modified polysaccharides of the present
`invention. Details concerning the selection and amounts of
`cosmetic ingredients, other additives, and blending proce-
`dures are knownto those skilled in the art.
`The contraceptive compositions of the present invention
`may be delivered to the vagina of a mammal by any means
`knownto those skilled in the art. Typical forms for delivery
`of the compositions include, for example; creams, lotions,
`gels, foams, sponges, suppositories andfilms. In addition the
`compositions of the present invention may be used as
`personal care lubricants, such as, for example, as condom
`lubricants, and the like. Such lubricants may comprise
`commonly knowningredients such as, for example: humec-
`tants; e.g., glycerine, sorbitol, mannitol, glycols and glycol
`ethers; buffers, e.g., glucono-d-lactone; germicides or bac-
`tericides, e.g., chlorhexidine gluconate; preservatives, e.g.,
`methylparaben; viscosifiers; e.g., hydroxyethyl cellulose,
`etc.; other adjuvents; e.g., colors and fragrances;in addition
`to the compositions of the present invention. Those skilled
`in the art will recognize that the physical properties, e.g.,
`viscosity, of such delivery forms may vary widely. For
`example, the viscosity of a gel form of the composition of
`the present invention, e.g. 150,000 centipoise, may be sub-
`stantially higher than the viscosity of lotion form of the
`composition of the present invention, e.g., 100 centipoise.
`Further details concerning the materials, ingredients, pro-
`portionsand proceduresof such delivery forms are known to
`those skilled in the art.
`The contraceptive compositions of the present invention
`are preferably administered to the vagina of the mammal in
`a dosage whichis effective to immobilize sperm present in
`the vagina and/or to inhibit their penetration in cervical
`mucus. Typical dosages range between about 0.01 to 0.2
`gramsof the composition per kilogram of body weightof the
`mammal.
`Quite surprisingly, it has been found that the hydropho-
`bically modified polysaccharides of the present invention
`can provide a high degree of substantivity to the mucous
`membrane ofthe vagina, in addition to being non-irritating
`to the mucous membrane even in the presence of normally
`irritating active ingredients such as Nonoxonyl-9, Moreover,
`the hydrophobically modified polysaccharides of the present
`invention can provide a high degreeofsaline compatibility.
`Saline compatability is an importantattribute of contracep-
`tive compositions. As usedherein, the term “saline compat-
`ability” means that the contraceptive composition remains
`dissolved, i.e., does not separate at 25° C. and ] atmosphere,
`in a saline solution, i.e., 9 grams of NaCl per liter of water,
`at concentrations of up to at least 2 weight percent, prefer-
`
`6
`ably 5 weight percent, for at least one hour, preferably at
`least 24 hours. Preferably, there are appropriate levels of the
`hydrophobic substituentandthe ionic substituent to enhance
`the saline compatibility of the composition. The molar ratio
`of the ionic substituent to the hydrophobic substituent is
`preferably at least 1.5:1, more preferably 2.0:1 and most
`preferably at least 2.5:1. When the hydrophohic substituen)..
`is not ionic, the molar ratio of the ionic sut#gigient to the
`hydrophobic substituent is equal to the molar ratio of the
`ionic substituent to the hydrophobic substituent. When the
`hydrophobic substituentis ionic, the molar ratio of the ionic
`substituent to the hydrophobic substituent is equal to the
`sum of the moles of ionic substituents and hydrophobic
`substituents per mole of hydrophobic substituent. For
`example,if the substitution level of a cationic, hydrophobic
`substituent is 0.12 gram moles per gram mole of polysac-
`charide, and the substitution level of the cationic substituent
`is 0.2 gram moles per mole of polysaccharide,then the molar
`ratio of the ionic substituent to the hydrophobic substituent
`would be 2.67,i.e., (0.12+0.20)+0.12=2.67.
`Thus, the compounds of the present invention are par-
`ticularly suitable for use as excipients for contraceptive
`compositions because of their desirable combination of
`saline compatibility, low irritation potential, substantivity
`and ability to impair sperm motility.
`
`20
`
`EXAMPLES
`
`30
`
`The following examples are provided for illustrative
`purposesandare not intendedto limit the scope of the claims
`which follow.
`
`DEFINITIONS
`
`The following ingredients were used in the Examples.
`CMC—carboxymethyl cellulose having a viscosity of
`400-800 centipoise, available from Aqualon Company,
`Wilmington, Del.
`CL—chitosan lactate having a 1% solution viscosity of 15
`to 250 centipoise, available from Dainichiseika Colors and
`Chemicals Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
`CONCEPTROL—a commercially available contracep-
`tive composition containing CMC and POV sold by
`Advanced Care Products, Ortho, Johnson and Johnson, New
`Brunswick, N.J.
`trimethyl ammonium chloride
`CS1—2,3 epoxypropyl
`available from DeGussa Corporation, sold as Quab 151.
`DS—dextran sulfate having a molecular weight of
`40,000-50,000 g/gmole, available from United States Bio-
`medical Corp., Cleveland, Ohio.
`HECi1—hydroxyethyl cellulose having a viscosity of
`4400-6000 centipoise (1% solution) available from Union
`Carbide Corp., Danbury, Conn., sold as Cellosize® QP-100
`M.
`
`HPC1—hydroxypropyl cellulose having a viscosity of
`1500-3000 centipoise (1% solution) available from Aqualon
`Company, Wilmington, Del.
`dimethyldodecyl
`HS1—3-chloro-2-hydroxypropy]
`ammonium chloride available from DeGussa Corporation,
`Ridgefield Park, N.J., sold as Quab 342.
`dimethyloctadecyl
`HS2—3-chloro-2-hydroxypropyl
`ammonium chloride available from DeGussa Corporation,
`Ridgefield Park, N.J., sold as Quab 426.
`HS3—nonylphenylglycidyl ether available from Rhone
`Poulenc sold as Heloxy 64.
`
`50
`
`65
`
`Page 4
`
`Page 4
`
`

`

`5,595,980
`
`7
`JR—a cationic hydroxyethyl cellulose having a viscosity
`of 300-500 centipoise available from Union Carbide Corp.,
`Danbury, Conn.
`N-9—Nonoxynol-9 USP available from Rhone Poulenc,
`Cranberry, N.J., sold as Igepal CO-630 Special.
`P-20—polyoxyethylene 20-sorbitan monolaurate, avail-
`able from ICI Americas, Inc., Wilmington, Del., sold as
`Tween 20.
`
`P-80—polyoxyethylene 80-sorbitan mono-oleate, avail-
`able from ICI Americas, Inc., Wilmington, Del., sold as
`Tween 80.
`
`PG—propylene glycol USP,available from Fisher Scien-
`tific, Fairlawn, N.J.
`POL. 1—acationic, hydrophobically modified hydroxy-
`ethyl cellulose having a viscosity of 100 to 500 centipoise
`(2% solution) and containing a hydrophobic substituent
`containing a hydrocarbon portion having 12 carbon atoms
`and a cationic substituent, available from Union Carbide,
`Danbury, Conn. sold as Quatrisoft®.
`POL. 2—a cationic, hydrophobically modified hydroxy-
`ethyl cellulose having a viscosity of 50 to 500 (2% solution)
`centipoise and containing a hydrophobic substituent con-
`taining a hydrocarbon portion having 12 carbon atoms and
`a cationic substituent.
`
`POL. 3—a cationic, hydrophobically modified hydroxy-
`ethyl cellulose having a viscosity of 50 to 500 (2% solution)
`centipoise and containing a hydrophobic substituent con-
`taining a hydrocarbon portion having 18 carbon atoms and
`a cationic substituent.
`
`POL. 4—a non-ionic hydrophobically modified hydroxy-
`ethyl cellulose having a molecular weight of 300,000
`g/gmole having a hydrophobic substituent containing a
`hydrocarbon portion having 16 carbon atoms available from
`the Aqualon Company, Wilmington, Del., sold as Natrosol®
`Plus.
`
`POL. 5—a hydrophobically modified dextran sulfate hav-
`ing a molecular weight of 50,000 g/gmole and containing
`2.8 wt. % of a hydrophobic substituent containing a hydro-
`carbon portion having 15 carbon atoms.
`POL. 6—a hydrophobically modified carboxymethy! cel-
`lulose having a viscosity of 50 to 500 (2% solution) centi-
`poise and containing 1.2 wt. % of a hydrophobic substituent
`containing a hydrocarbon portion having 15 carbon atoms.
`POV—polyvinyl pyrrolidone Povidone USP having a
`molecular weight of 45,000 g/gmole, available from ISP
`Chemicals Wayne, N.J.
`SOR—sorbitol, available from Fisher Scientific, Fair-
`lawn, N.J,
`The following tests were used in the Examples.
`Modified One End Test (MOET)—This test was used to
`determine the effect of various compounds on sperm pen-
`etration in cervical mucus. Capillary tubes containing
`bovine cervical mucus obtained from Serono-Baker Diag-
`nostics Inc., Allentown, Pa. sold as Penetrax, were used to
`conductthe test. Each of the test compositions containing
`the polymer to be tested was diluted in a saline solution,i.e.,
`at 9 grams of NaC!per liter of water, to a polymer concen-
`tration of between 0.007 w/v % and 0.45 wiv % (wiv %
`equals grams per 100 milliliters). The test was conducted at
`a concentration of either 0.003 w/v% polymer, 0.007 w/v %
`polymer or 1 g of test composition per 11 ml of saline. The
`tubes were thawedbriefly and then broken open. The open
`end was placed in a container containing the sample in
`saline. The sample was allowed to migrate for 30 minutes
`through the tube. A semen sample was then diluted with a
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`8
`buffer solution to 60 million motile sperm per milliliter and
`mixed with the polymer sample. The tube containing the
`polymer sample was then re-inserted into the container
`containing the mixed solution and stored in an incubator at
`37° C. in an atmosphere of 5 percent carbon dioxide in air
`for 60 minutes. The container and tube were then removed
`
`from the incubator and the tube wasvisually analyzed under
`a microscope for the migration of motile vanguard sperm
`through the tube. The results are expressed as percentage of
`migration as compared to control samples. In the control
`samples, the tubes were incubated with saline containing no
`polymer.
`Double End Test (DET)—This test was also used to
`biologically evaluate the diffusion of the compounds in
`cervical mucus. The DET is similar to the MOET with the
`exception that 20 millimeter capillary tubes were exposed to
`the polymer samples by one end for 60 minutes and subse-
`quently by the other end to the semen solution for 60
`minutes so that sperm could migrate in the opposite direc-
`tion of the polymer sample. Penetration length of vanguard
`motile sperm is recorded and the results are expressed as
`percentage of migration as compared to control samples, i.e.,
`saline containing no polymer. The shorter the sperm pen-
`etration, the greater the compoundbiodiffusion. In addition,
`the samples used for the DET were further modified to
`contain 4 weight percent of N-9. The DET valuesreflect how
`far a test compound can physically diffuse in cervical mucus
`while still displaying sperm penetration inhibitory activity.
`Simultaneous One End Test (SOET)—This test was used
`to detect
`the quick blocking effects of the compounds
`particularly exerted through sperm motility alterations. The
`SOET is similar to the MOET except that the solution
`containing the polymer is mixed with the semen sample and
`then oneendofthe capillary tube containing bovine cervical
`mucusis inserted into the mixture of the polymer and semen
`sample andstoredin an incubatorat 37° C. in an atmosphere
`of 5% carbon dioxide in air for 60 minutes. Penetration
`length of vanguard motile sperm is recorded and the results
`are expressed as percentage of migration as compared to
`control samples, i.c., saline containing no polymer. In the
`SOET,if not impeded by the test compound, the sperm have
`the ability to migrate into the tube immediately after contact.
`Sander-Cramer test—This test was used to evaluate the
`spermicidal effectiveness of contraceptive compositions.
`The Sander-Cramertest was developedin the laboratories of
`Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation. A slight modification of
`the original protocol was used as described below. Serial
`dilutions of each test composition in volumes of 250 micro-
`liters were added to 50 microliters of semen adjusted to 60
`million motile sperm per milliter at room temperature. The
`end point was thegreatest. dilution at which all of the sperm
`were immobilized within 20 seconds. Results are expressed
`as minimum effective concentrations in milligrams per mil-
`liliter.
`
`Example 1
`
`Preparation of Cellulose Ether Derivative
`
`A reaction vessel equipped with a stirrer, condenser,
`addition funnels, and nitrogen supply, was charged with 39
`grams of HEC] and 272 grams of anhydrous acetone. The
`reactor was purged with nitrogen and 23 grams of an
`aqueous sodium hydroxide solution containing 20 wt %
`sodium hydroxide was added. After stirring for 30 minutes,
`64 g of an aqueous solution containing 40 wt % HS1 was
`added. The reactor mixture was heated to 55° C. and held
`
`Page 5
`
`Page 5
`
`

`

`5,595,980
`
`10
`9
`Thereafter, 2.62 grams were dissolved in 97.38 grams of
`there for 2 hours. Then 8.7 grams of an aqueous solution
`containing 70 wt % CS1 was added. The mixture was held
`water with good agitation and heated to 75° C. for complete
`at 55° C. for another hour. The reaction was cooled and
`solution. The pH of the solution was adjusted to 4.7 with
`neutralized with 3 grams glacial acetic acid. The reaction
`lactic add. The solution viscosity as determined by a Brook-
`.
`slurry wasfiltered and washed 7 times with 400 grams of an 5
`‘ld Cone & Plate Viscometer Model DV-1 CP-41 at 20 rpm
`aqueous solution containing 90 wt % acetone, once with 400
`grams of an aqueoussolution containing 94 wt % acetone,|Was 609 centipoise. The 2.5 wt. % solution was thenused to
`and once with 400 grams of a solution containing 0.5
`make test compositions with varying polymer solids content
`milliliter of a 40 wt % glyoxal solution, 0.5 milliliter of
`by dilution with water.
`acetic acid and the balance acetone. After drying, 58 grams
`2) A test compositi
`taining
`1.25 wt. % polymer and
`of product containing 1.5% volatiles was obtained. The
`i Oe by >00aoe eretbemca 50 ee of the
`nitrogen content of the polymer was 1.60 wt. %, and the
`WE
`®Y
`BN
`8)
`“<0
`prepared
`polymer had a 2% solution viscosity of 190 centipoise.
`above 2.5 wt. % solution (1) with 1.25 grams of P-20 and
`48.75 grams of water. The MOET was then performed using
`15 a sample containing1 g of the test composition per 11 ml
`Example 2
`saline. The MOETvalue was 0% indicating an exceptional
`cn ae
`reduction in sperm penetration in cervical mucus. This
`Nonoxynol-9 Compatibility
`finding is particularly important since the same sample
`In order to compare the compatibility of nonoxynol-9
`with non-hydrophobically modified polymeric delivery . failed to completely immobilize sperm underthe conditions
`compo and thepolymeric oooanole.taeconofthe
`employed in the Sander-Cramertest. The MOETvalue was
`present
`invention,
`ie
`TOWOWwINg Cx
`- Was condu
`“
`:
`5a
`HEC1, HPC1 and POL.4 were used in this Example.
`12% ata polymer concentration of 0.007 wiv% also ind
`:
`os
`cating an exceptional reduction in sperm penetration in
`One hundred gram aqueous solutions containing 1.5
`ical
`weight percent of the polymeric delivery component being ,;
`cervical mucus.
`tested were prepared. To each solution, 4,16 grams of N-9
`(3) An additional quantity of the above test composition
`were added and mixed for 20 minutes. Each solution was
`was used to prepare a 4 wt. % N-9 composition containing
`then divided into two portions. The first portion wasstored
`1.25 wt. % polymer and 1.25 wt. % P-20, Approximately 96
`at room temperature, i.¢., about 25° C., and the second
`gramsofthe test composition described in (2) above was
`solution was stored at about 35° C. After 24 hours, the 4,
`—.
`d
`with 4.0
`f N-9 for 30 minutes. The DET was
`
`solution containing HEC1 demonstrated a phase separation~XC WHS Erams oO! N= ures. 7 was
`
`
`
`which indicated that the HEC1, which was not hydropho-
`__then performedand the result showeda sperm penetration of
`bically modified, was incompatible with N-9. Similarly,
`60%. This reveals a compound cervical mucusbiodiffusion
`after 24 hours t

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket