throbber
a2) United States Patent
`US 6,801,799 B2
`qo) Patent No.:
`Mendelson
`Oct. 5, 2004
`(45) Date of Patent:
`
`US006801799B2
`
`(54) PULSE OXIMETER AND METHOD OF
`OPERATION
`
`(75)
`
`Inventor: Yitzhak Mendelson, Worcester, MA
`(US)
`
`(73) Assignee: Cybro Medical, Ltd., Haifa (IL)
`
`(*) Notice:
`
`Subject to any disclaimer, the term ofthis
`patent is extended or adjusted under 35
`US.C. 154(b) by 0 days.
`
`(21) Appl. No.: 10/360,666
`
`(22) Filed:
`
`Feb. 6, 2003
`
`(65)
`
`Prior Publication Data
`US 2003/0144584 Al Jul. 31, 2003
`
`Related U.S. Application Data
`
`(62) Division of application No. 09/939,391, filed on Aug. 24,
`2001, now abandoned.
`
`Foreign Application Priority Data
`(30)
`Oct. 5, 2000
`(IL)
`seseessssssssessseesssseesvesssesssseeesesssess 138884
`
`(SL) Tite C0? eee ceceecceeeneceeeeceeneeneanenns A61B 3/00
`(52) U.S. Ch oc 600/330; 600/322; 600/336
`(58) Field of Search 0.0... 600/310, 322,
`600/323, 330, 336
`
`(56)
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`3,638,640 A
`3,799,672 A
`3,847,483 A
`3,998,550 A
`4,086,915 A
`4,167,331 A
`4,266,554 A
`4,357,105 A
`4,407,290 A
`4,446,871 A
`4,714,341 A
`
`2/1972 Shaw
`3/1974 Vurek oo. 356/41
`w. 356/41
`11/1974 Shaw.......
`
`12/1976 Konishi et al... 356/39
`5/1978 Kolskyet al.
`9/1979 Nielsen wees 356/39
`5/1981 Hamaguri
`11/1982 LoretZ .... eee eceeee 356/40
`10/1983 Wilber
`5/1984 Imura
`12/1987 Hamaguri et al... 356/41
`
`4,740,080
`4,773,422
`4,796,636
`4,802,486
`4,819,649
`4,819,752
`4,854,699
`4,859,057
`4,867,557
`4,892,101
`4,928,692
`4,934,372
`4,960,126
`5,190,038
`5,224,478
`5,348,004
`5,349,519
`
`rrrrrrrrrrrrrree
`
`4/1988
`9/1988
`1/1989
`2/1989
`4/1989
`4/1989
`8/1989
`8/1989
`9/1989
`1/1990
`5/1990
`6/1990
`10/1990
`3/1993
`FA993
`9/1994
`9/1994
`
`........... 356/326
`
`Donohue et al.
`Isaacson etal.
`Branstetter et al.
`Goodmanetal.
`Rogers etal.
`Zelin
`Edgar, Jt. cece 356/41
`‘Taylor et al.
`..
`» 356/41
`
`Takatani et al... 356/41
`Cheunget al.
`Goodmanet al.
`Corenmanetal.
`Conlon
`Polsonet al.
`Sakaiet al.
`Hollub
`Kaestle wc. eeeeeeee 364/413.09
`
`(List continued on next page.)
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`WO
`WO
`WO
`
`{1994
`W09403 102
`5/2001
`WO0154573
`11/2001
`WO0184107
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`“Reflecance Pulse Oximetry at the Forehead of Newborns:
`The Influenece of Varying Pressure on the Probe”; A. Carin
`M. Dassel, MD, et el.; Dept of Obstetrics and Gynecology,
`Univ. Hospital Groningen, Groningen; Journal of Clinical
`Monitoring 12: pp. 421-428, 1990.
`(List continued on next page.)
`Primary Examiner—Eric F. Winakur
`(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Howard & Howard
`ABSTRACT
`(57)
`
`A sensor for use in an optical measurement device and a
`method for non-invasive measurementof a blood parameter.
`The sensor includes sensor housing, a source of radiation
`coupled to the housing, and a detector assembly coupled to
`the housing. The source of radiation is adapted to emit
`radiation at predetermined frequencies. The detector assem-
`bly is adapted to detect reflected radiation at
`least one
`predetermined frequencyand to generate respective signals.
`Thesignals are used to determine the parameter of the blood.
`
`5 Claims, 6 Drawing Shects
`
`17
`
` Oo
`
`18:
`
`0001
`
`Apple Inc.
`APL1053
`U.S. Patent No. 8,923,941
`FITBIT, Ex. 1053
`
`Apple Inc.
`APL1053
`U.S. Patent No. 8,923,941
`
`0001
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1053
`
`

`

`US 6,801,799 B2
`Page 2
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`........... 600/323
`
`10/1994 Thomasetal.
`5,355,880 A
`3/1995 Polsonet al.
`5,398,680 A
`5/1995 Barthelemyet al.
`5,413,100 A
`6/1995 Casciani etal.
`5,421,329 A
`1/1996 Diab etal.
`5,482,036 A
`2/1996 Diab ct al.
`5,490,505 A
`2/1996 Takatani et al.
`5,490,506 A
`2/1996 Robinson et al.
`5,494,032 A *
`5/1996 Gerhard
`5,517,988 A
`7/1996 Potratz
`5,533,507 A
`5/1997 Diab ct al.
`5,632,272 A
`TA997 Yorkey
`5,645,060 A
`11/1997 Diab etal.
`5,685,299 A
`6/1998 Diab etal.
`5,758,644 A
`6/1998 Diab et al. oe. 600/364
`5,769,785 A
`7/1998 Cascianict al.
`5,782,237 A
`10/1998 Diab etal. ..
`... 600/310
`5,823,950 A
`
`12/1998 Larsen etal. ..
`».. 600/323
`5,842,981 A
`12/1998 Taker, Jr. et al.
`... 600/500
`5,853,364 A
`
`F/1999 Diab oe eeeeeee 600/323
`5,919,134 A
`11/1999 Mannheimerct al.
`...... 600/322
`5,995,856 A
`.....
`... 600/323
`1/2000 Diab et al.
`6,011,986 A
`
`.. 356/41
`2/2000 Fine et al.
`..
`6,031,603 A
`
`3/2000 Diab etal. .....
`600/364
`6,036,642 A
`
`.....
`5/2000 Diab et al.
`600/310
`6,067,462 A
`
`. 600/310
`6/2000 Diab ct al.
`..
`6,081,735 A
`7/2000 Baker, Jr. et al. oe. 600/500
`6,083,172 A
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`“Reflectance Pulse Oximetry—Principles and Obstetric
`Application in the Zurich Systen’’; Vokcr Konig, Renate
`Huch, and Albert Huch; Perinatal Physiology Research
`Dept., Dept. of Obstetrics, Computing 14: pp. 403-412,
`1998,
`“Effect of location of the sensor on reflectance pulse oxim-
`etry”; A.C. M. Dassel, Research Fellowetal. British Journal
`of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Aug. 1997, vol. 104, pp.
`910-916.
`
`“Design and Evaluation of a New Reflectance Pulse Oxime-
`ter Sensor”; Y. Mendelson, PhD,etal.; Worcester Polytech-
`nic Institute, Biomedical Engineering Program, Worcester,
`MA 01609; Association for the Advancement of Medical
`Instrumentation, vol. 22, No. 4, 1988; pp. 167-173.
`
`“Skin Reflectance Pulse Oximetry: In Vivo Measurements
`from the Forearm and Calf’; Y. Mednelson, PhD and M.J.
`McGinn, MSc; Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, Worcester
`Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609; Journal of
`Clinical Monitoring, vol. 7, No. 1, 1991; pp. 7-12.
`
`“Experimental and Clinical Evaluation of a Noninvasive
`Reflectance Pulse Oximeter Sensor”; Setsuo Takatani, PhD,
`et al; Dept. of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, One
`Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030; Journal of Clinical
`Monitoring, vol. 8, No. 4, Oct. 1992; pp. 257-266.
`
`“Wavelength Selection for Low-Saturation Pulse Oxim-
`etry”; Paul D. Mannheimer, et al; JEEE ‘lransactions on
`Biomedical Engineering, vol. 44, No. 3, Mar. 1997; pp.
`148-158.
`
`“Noninvasive Pulse Oximetry Utilizing Skin Reflectance
`Photoplethysmography”; Yitzhak Mendelson and Burt D.
`Ochs; IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol.
`35, No. 10, Oct. 1988; pp. 798-805.
`
`“Physio—-optical considerations in the design offetal pulse
`oximetry sensors’; P.D. Mannheimer, M.E. Fein and J.R.
`Casciani; European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and
`Reproductive Biology 72 Suppl. 1 (1997) S9-S19.
`“Fetal pulse oximetry: influence of tissue blood content and
`hemoglobin concentration in a new in-vitro mode?”; ‘Vho-
`mas Edrich, Gerhard Rall, Reinhold Knitza; European Jour-
`nal if Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
`72 Suppl. 1 (1997) $29-S34.
`
`* cited by examiner
`
`0002
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1053
`
`0002
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1053
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Oct. 5, 2004
`
`Sheet 1 of 6
`
`US 6,801,799 B2
`
`HELOGLOBIN SPECTRA IN
`OXIMETRY
`
`It{iIIItI ttt
`
`EXTINCTION
`
`COEFICIENT
`
`100
`
`90
`
`80
`
`70
`
`60
`
`50
`
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`
`
`OXYGENSATURATION
`
`10
`500
`
`600
`
`700
`
`800
`
`900
`
`1000
`
`WAVELENGTH (nm)
`
`Figure 1
`
`CALIBRATION OF A PULSE OXIMETER
`
`0
`
`1.0
`
`2.6
`
`3.0
`
`4.0
`
`5.0
`
`R/IR RATIO
`Figure 2
`
`0003
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1053
`
`0003
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1053
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Oct. 5, 2004
`
`Sheet 2 of 6
`
`US 6,801,799 B2
`
`
`
`EMITTING
`DIODES
`
` LIGHT
`
`VEIN
`
`ARTERY
`
`Figure 3
`
`
`
`0004
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1053
`
`0004
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1053
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Oct. 5, 2004
`
`Sheet 3 of 6
`
`US 6,801,799 B2
`
`REFLECTION SENSOR
`
`1F gu
`
`re5A
`
`REFLECTION SENSOR
`
`SuFFi
`
`re 5B
`
`guFi
`
`re6
`
`0005
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1053
`
`0005
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1053
`
`
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Oct. 5, 2004
`
`Sheet 4 of 6
`
`US 6,801,799 B2
`
`MICROPROCESSOR
`
`
`
`DISPLAY
`
`0006
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1053
`
`0006
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1053
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Oct. 5, 2004
`
`Sheet 5 of 6
`
`US 6,801,799 B2
`
`REJECT DATA POINT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`GOTO STEP 3 Figure 10A
`
`CALCULATE W/W;
`(NEAR AND FAR)
`
`NO
`
`ACCEPT POINT:
`
`REJECT POINT:
`
`
`TURN ON ALARM
`(ADJUST SENSOR POSITION)
`
`0007
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1053
`
`0007
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1053
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Oct. 5, 2004
`
`Sheet 6 of 6
`
`US 6,801,799 B2
`
`
`
` REJECT POINT:
`Is
`
`
`THE QUALITY OF EACH
`
`
`TURN ON ALARM
`PHOTOPLETHYSMOGRAM
`
`(MOVEMENT/BREATHING ARTIFACTS)
`
`ACCEPTABLE
`
`?
`
`
`
`ACCEPT POINT:ON
`Figure 10B
`
`
`
`
`CALCULATE W, /W>
`AND W, /W,
`(NEAR AND FAR)
`
` REJECT POINT:
`
`?
`
`TAKE ANOTHER
`MEASUREMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` ACCEPTPOINT:
`
`COMPUTE AND UPDATE
`DISPLAY WITH NEW SpO» VALUE
`
`
`
`
`
`Figure10C_
`
`0008
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1053
`
`0008
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1053
`
`

`

`US 6,801,799 B2
`
`1
`PULSE OXIMETER AND METHOD OF
`OPERATION
`
`This application is a divisional application of U.S. patent
`application Ser. No. 09/939,391 filed Aug. 24, 2001, now
`abandoned.
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`1. Field of the Invention
`
`10
`
`This invention is generally in the field of pulse oximetry,
`and relates to a sensor for use in a pulse oximeter, and a
`method for the pulse oximeter operation.
`2. Background of the Invention
`Oximetry is based on specirophotometric measurements
`of changes in the color of blood, enabling the non-invasive
`determination of oxygen saturation in the paticnt’s blood.
`Generally, oximetry is based on the fact that the optical
`property of blood in the visible (between 500 and 700 nm)
`and near-infrared (between 700 and 1000 nom) spectra
`depends strongly on the amount of oxygen in blood.
`Referring to FIG. 1,
`there is illustrated a hemoglobin
`spectra measured by oximetry based techniques. Graphs G1
`and G2 correspond,respectively, to reduced hemoglobin, or
`deoxyhemoglobin (Hb), and oxygenated hemoglobin, or
`oxyhemoglobin (HbO,), spectra. As shown, deoxyhemoglo-
`bin (Hb) has a higher optical extinction (i.e., absorbs more
`light) in the red region of spectrum around 660 om, as
`compared to that of oxyhemoglobin (HbO,). On the other
`hand, in the near-infrared region of the spectrum around 940
`nm,
`the optical absorption by deoxyhemoglobin (Hb) is
`lower than the optical absorption of oxyhemoglobin (HbO.).
`Prior art non-invasive optical scnsors for measuring artc-
`rial oxyhemoglobin saturation (SaO,) by a pulse oximeter
`(termed SpO.,) are typically comprised of a pair of small and
`inexpensive light emitting diodes (LEDs), and a single
`highly sensitive silicon photodetector. A red (R) LED cen-
`tered on a peak emission wavelength around 660 nm and an
`infrared (IR) LED centered on a peak emission wavelength
`around 940 nm are used as light sources.
`Pulse oximetry relics on the detection of a photoplethys-
`mographic signal caused by variations in the quantity of
`arterial blood associated with periodic contraction and relax-
`ation of a patient’s heart. The magnitude of this signal
`depends on the amount of blood ejected from the heart into
`the peripheral vascular bed with each systolic cycle,
`the
`optical absorption of the blood, absorption by skin and tissue
`components, and the specific wavelengths that are used to
`wn5
`illuminate the tissue. SaO, is determined by computing the 5
`relative magnitudes of the R and IR photoplcthysmograms.
`Electronic circuits inside the pulse oximeter separate the R
`and IR photoplethysmogramsinto their respective pulsatile
`(AC) and non-pulsatile (DC) signal components. An algo-
`rithm inside the pulse oximeter performs a mathematical
`normalization by which the time-varying AC signal at each
`wavelength is divided by the corresponding time-invariant
`DC component which results mainly from the light absorbed
`and scattered by the bloodlesstissue, residual arterial blood
`when the heart is in diastole, venous blood and skin pig-
`mentation.
`
`bomn
`*
`
`£a
`
`QDa
`
`Since it is assumed that the AC portion results only from
`the arterial blood component, this scaling process provides
`a normalized RAR ratio (ie., the ratio of AC/DC values
`corresponding to R- and IR-spectrum wavelengths,
`respectively), which is highly dependent on SaO., but is
`largely independentof the volumeofarterial blood entering
`
`2
`the tissue during systole, skin pigmentation, skin thickness
`and vascular structure. Hence, the instrument does not need
`to be re-calibrated for measurements on different patients.
`‘Typical calibration of a pulse oximeteris illustrated in FIG.
`2 by presenting the empirical relationship between SaO, and
`the normalized R/IR ratio, which is programmed by the
`pulse oximeters’ manufacturers.
`Pulse oximeters are of two kinds operating, respectively,
`in transmission andreflection modes. In transmission-mode
`pulse oximetry, an optical sensor for measuring SaO, is
`usually attached across a fingertip, foot or earlobe, suchthat
`the tissue is sandwiched between the light source and the
`photodetector.
`In reflection-mode or backscatler type pulse oximetry, as
`shown in FIG. 3,
`the LEDs and photodetector are both
`mounted side-by-side next to cach other on the same planar
`substrate. This arrangement allows for measuring SaO, from
`multiple convenient locations on the body (e.g. the head,
`torso, or upper limbs), where conventional transmission-
`mode measurements are not feasible. or this reason, non-
`invasive reflectance pulse oximetry has recently become an
`important newclinical technique with potential benefits in
`fetal and neonatal monitoring. Using reflectance oximetryto
`monitor SaO,
`in the fetus during labor, where the only
`accessible location is the fetal scalp or checks, or on the
`chest
`in infants with low peripheral perfusion, provides
`several more convenient locations for sensor attachment.
`
`Reflection pulse oximetry, while being based on similar
`spectrophotometric principles as the transmission one, is
`more challenging to perform and has unique problems that
`can not always be solved by solutions suitable for solving
`the problems associated with the transmission-mode pulsc
`oximetry. Generally, comparing transmission and reflection
`pulse oximetry,
`the problems associated with reflection
`pulse oximetry consist of the following:
`In reflection pulse oximetry, the pulsatile AC signals are
`generally very small and, depending on sensor configuration
`and placement, have larger DC components as compared to
`those of transmission pulse oximetry. As illustrated in TIG.
`4, in addition to the optical absorption and reflection due to
`blood, the DC signal of the R and IR photoplethysmograms
`in reflection pulse oximetry can be adversely affected by
`strong reflections from a bone. ‘This problem becomes more
`apparcnt when applying mcasurcments at such body loca-
`tions as the forehead and the scalp, or when the sensor is
`mounted on the chest over the ribcage. Similarly, variations
`in contact pressure between the sensor and the skin can
`cause larger errors in reflection pulse oximetry (as compared
`to transmission pulse oximetry) since someof the blood near
`the superficial layers of the skin may be normally displaced
`awayfrom the sensor housing towards deeper subcutaneous
`structures. Consequently,
`the highly reflective bloodless
`tissue compartment near the surface of the skin can cause
`large errors even at body locations where the bone is located
`too far awayto influence the incident light generated by the
`sensor.
`
`Another problem with currently available reflectance sen-
`sors is the potential for specular reflection caused by the
`superficial layers of the skin, when an air gap exists between
`the scnsor and the skin, or by direct shunting of light
`between the LEDsand the photodetector through a thin layer
`of fluid which may be due to excessive sweating or from
`amniotic fluid present during delivery.
`It is important to keep in mind the two fundamental
`assumptions underlying the conventional dual-wavelength
`pulse oximetry, which are as follows:
`
`0009
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1053
`
`0009
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1053
`
`

`

`US 6,801,799 B2
`
`3
`illuminating
`(1) the path of light rays with different
`wavelengths in tissue are substantially equal and, therefore,
`cancel each other; and (2) each light source illuminates the
`same pulsatile change in arterial blood volume.
`Furthermore,
`the correlation between optical measure-
`ments and tissue absorptions in pulse oximetry are based on
`the fundamental assumption that light propagation is detcr-
`mined primarily by absorbable due to Lambent-Beer’s law
`neglecting multiple scattering effects in biologicaltissues. In
`practice, however, the optical paths of different wavelengths
`in biological tissues is known to vary more in reflectance
`oximetry compared to transmission oximetry, since it
`strongly depends on the light scattering properties of the
`illuminated tissue and sensor mounting.
`Several human validation studies, backed by animal
`investigations, have suggested that uncontrollable physi-
`ological and physical parameters can cause large variations
`in the calibration curve of reflectance pulse oximeters pri-
`marily at low oxygen saturation valucs below 70%. It was
`observed that the accuracy of pulse oximeters in clinical use
`might be adversely affected by a number of physiological
`parameters when measurements are made from sensors
`attached to the forehead, chest, or the buttock area. While the
`exact sources of these variations are not fully understood, it
`is generally believed that there are a few physiological and
`anatomical factors that may be the major source of these
`errors. It is also well known for example that changesin the
`ratio of blood to bloodless tissuc volumes may occur
`through venous congestion, vasoconstriction/vasodilatation,
`or through mechanical pressure exerted by the sensor on the
`skin.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`30
`
`Additionally, the empirically derived calibration curve of
`a pulse oximeter can be altered by the effects of contact
`pressure exerted bythe probe on the skin. ‘This 1s associated
`with the following. The light paths in reficctance oximetry
`are not well defined (as compared to transmission oximetry),
`and thus maydiffer between the red and infrared wave-
`lengths. Furthermore, the forehead and scalp areas consist of
`a relatively thin subcutaneous layer with the cranium bone
`underneath, while the tissue of other anatomical structures,
`such as the buttock and limbs, consists of a much thicker
`layer of skin and subcutaneous lssues withoul a nearby
`bony support that acts as a strong light reflector.
`Several in vivo and in vitro studies have confirmed that
`
`
`uncontrollable physiological and physical parameters (e.g.,
`
`
`different amounts of contact pressure applied by the sensor
`on the skin, variation in the ratio of bloodless tissue-to-blood
`content, or site-to-site variations) can often cause large
`errors in the oxygen saturation readings of a pulse oximeter,
`which are normally derived based on a single internally-
`programmed calibration curve. The relevant in vivo studics
`are disclosed in the following publications:
`1. Dasscl, ct al., “Effcet of location of the scnsor on
`reflectance pulse oximetry”, British Journal of Obstetrics
`and Gynecology, vol. 104, pp. 910-916, (1997);
`the
`2. Dassel, et al., “Reflectance pulse oximetry at
`forehead of newborns: The influence of varying pressure on
`the probe”, Journal of Clinical Monitoring, vol. 12, pp.
`421-428, (1996).
`‘The relevant in vitro studies are disclosed, for example in
`the following publication:
`3. Edrichet al., “etal pulse oximetry: influenceof tissue
`blood content and hemoglobin concentration in a new
`in-vitro model”, European Journal of Obstetrics and Gyne-
`cology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 72, suppl. 1, pp.
`$29-S34, (1997).
`
`40
`
`wn5
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`4
`Improved sensors for application in dual-wavelength
`reflectance pulse oximetry have been developed. As dis-
`closed in the following publication: Mendelson, ct al.,
`“Noninvasive pulse oximetry utilizing skin reflectance
`photoplethysmography”, IEEE ‘Iransactions on Biomedical
`Engineering, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 798-805 (1988), the total
`amount of backscattered light that can be detected by a
`reflectance sensoris directly proportional to the number of
`photodetectors placed around the LEDs. Additional
`improvements in signal-to-noise ratio were achieved by
`increasing the active area of the photodetector and optimiz-
`ing the separation distance between the light sources and
`photodetectors.
`Another approach is based on the use of a sensor having
`six photodiodes arranged symmetrically around the LEDs
`that is disclosed in the following publications:
`4. Mendelson, ct al., “Design and cvaluation of a ncw
`reflectance pulse oximeter sensor”, Medical
`Instrumentation, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 167-173 (1988); and
`5. Mendelson,etal., “Skin reflectance pulse oximetry: in
`vivo measurements from the forearm and calf’, Journal of
`Clinical Monitoring, vol. 7, pp. 7-12, (1991).
`According to this approach,
`in order to maximize the
`fraction of backscattered light collected by the sensor, the
`currents from all six photodiodes are summedelectronically
`by internal circuitry in the pulse oximeter. This configuration
`essentially creates a large area photodetector made of six
`discrete photodiodes connected in parallel
`to produce a
`single current that is proportional to the amount of light
`backscattered from the skin. Several studies showedthatthis
`sensor configuration could be used successfully to accu-
`rately measure SaO,, from the forehead, forearm and the calf
`on humans. However,
`this sensor requires a means for
`heating the skin in ordcrto increase local blood flow, which
`has practical limitations since it could cause skin burns.
`Yet another prototype reflectance sensor is based on eight
`dual-wavelength LEDs and a single photodiode, and is
`disclosed in the following publication: Takatani et al.,
`“Experimental and clinical evaluation of a noninvasive
`reflectance pulse oximeter sensor”, Journal of Clinical
`Monitoring, vol. 8, pp. 257-266 (1992). Here, four R and
`four IR LEDsare spaced at 90-degree intervals around the
`substrate and at an equal radial distance from the photo-
`diode.
`
`A similar sensor configuration based on six photodetec-
`tors mounted in the center of the sensor around the LEDsis
`disclosed in the following publication: Konig, et al.,
`“Reflectance pulse oximetry—principles and obstetric appli-
`cation in the Zurich system”, Journal of Clinical Monitoring,
`vol. 14, pp. 403-412 (1998).
`According to the techniques disclosed inall of the above
`publications, only LEDs of two wavelengths, R and IR, are
`used as light sourecs, and the computation of SaO, is bascd
`on reflection photoplethysmograms measured by a single
`photodetector, regardless of whether one or multiple photo-
`diodes chips are used to construct the sensor. This is because
`of the fact that the individual signals from the photodetector
`elements are all summed together electronically inside the
`pulse oximeter. Furthermore, while a radially-symmetric
`photodetector array can help to maximize the detection of
`backscattered light from the skin and minimize differences
`from local tissuc inhomogencity, human and animal studics
`
`confirmed that this configuration can not completely elimi-
`
`
`
`nate errors caused by pressure differences and site-to-site
`variations.
`
`The use of a nominal dual-wavelength pair of 735/890 nm
`was suggested as providing the best choice for optimizing
`
`0010
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1053
`
`0010
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1053
`
`

`

`US 6,801,799 B2
`
`5
`accuracy, as well as sensitivity in dual-wavelength reflec-
`
`tance pulse oximetry,
`in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,782,237 and
`
`
`
`5,421,329. This approach minimizes the effects of tissue
`heterogeneity and enables to obtain a balance in path length
`changes arising from perturbations in tissue absorbance.
`This is disclosed in the following publications:
`6. Mannheimer at al., “Physio-optical considerations in
`the design of fctal pulse oximctry sensors”, European Jour-
`nal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive
`Biology, vol. 72, suppl. 1, pp. S9-S19, (1997); and
`7. Mannheimerat al., “Wavelength selection for low-
`saturation pulse oximetry”, IEEE Transactions on Biomedi-
`cal Engineering, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 48-158 (1997)].
`However, replacing the conventional R wavelength at 660
`nm, which coincides with the region of the spectrum where
`the difference between the extinction coefficient of Hb and
`HbO,is maximal, with a wavelength emitting at 735 nm, not
`only lowers considerably the overall sensitivity of a pulse
`oximeter, but does not completely eliminate errors due to
`sensor placement and varying contact pressures.
`Pulse oximeter probes of a type comprising three or more
`LEDs for filtering noise and monitoring other functions,
`such as carboxyhemoglobin or various indicator dycs
`injected into the blood stream, have been developed and are 3.
`disclosed, for example, in WO 00/32099 and U.S. Pat. No.
`5,842,981. The techniques disclosed in these publications
`are aimedat providing an improved methadfor direct digital
`signal formation from input signals produced by the sensor
`and forfiltering noise.
`Noneof the above prior art techniques provides a solution
`to overcome the most cssential
`limitation in reflectance
`pulse oximetry, which requires the automatic correction of
`the internal calibration curve from which accurate and
`reproducible oxygen saturation values are derived, despite
`variations in contact pressure or site-to-site tissue heterage-
`neity.
`In practice, most sensors used in reflection pulse oximetry
`rely on closely spaced LED wavelengths in order to mini-
`
`mize the differences in the optical path Icngths of the
`
`different wavelengths. Nevertheless, within the wavelength
`range required for oximetry, even closely spaced LEDs with
`closely spaced wavelengths mounted on the same substrate
`can lead to large random error in the final determination of
`SaQ,.
`
`10
`
`toCc
`
`30
`
`
`
`£a
`
`SUMMARYOF THE INVENTION AND
`ADVANTAGES
`
`The object of the invention is to provide a novel sensor
`design and method that functions to correct the calibration
`relationship of a reflectance pulse oximeter, and reduce
`measurement inaccuracics in general. Another object of the
`invention is to provide a novel sensor and method that
`functions to correct the calibration relationship of a reflec-
`tance pulse oximeter, and reduce measurement inaccuracies
`in the lower range of oxygen saturation values (typically
`below 70%), which is the predominant range in neonatal and
`fetal applications.
`Yet another object of the present invention is to provide
`automatic correction of the internal calibration curve from
`which oxygen saturation is derived inside the oximeter in
`situations where variations in contact pressure or site-to-site
`tissue heterogeneity may cause large measurement inaccu-
`racies.
`
`Another object of the invention is to eliminate or reduce
`the effect of variations in the calibration of a reflectance
`
`wn5
`~
`
`QDa
`
`65
`
`6
`pulse oximeter between subjects, since perturbations caused
`by contact pressure remain one of the major sourcesof errors
`in reflectance pulse oximetry. In fetal pulse oximetry, there
`are additional factors, which must be properly compensated
`for in order to produce an accurate and reliable measurement
`of oxygen saturation. For example, the fetal head is usually
`the presenting part, and is a rather easily accessible location
`for application of reflectance pulse oximetry. However,
`uterine contractions can cause large and unpredictable varia-
`tions in the pressure exerted on the head and by the sensor
`on the skin, which can lead to large errors in the measure-
`mentof oxygen saturation by a dual-wavelength reflectance
`pulse oximeter. Another object of the inventionis to provide
`accurale measurement of oxygen saturation in the fetus
`during delivery.
`The basis for the errors in the oxygensaturation readings
`of a dual-wavelength pulse oximeter is the fact
`that,
`in
`practical situations, the reflectance sensor applications affect
`the distribution of blood in the superficial layers of the skin.
`This is different from an ideal situation, when a reflectance
`sensor measures light backscattered from a homogenous
`mixture of blood and bloodless tissue componcnts.
`Therefore, the R and IR DCsignals practically measured by
`photodetectors contain a relatively larger proportion of light
`absorbed byand reflected from the bloodless tissue com-
`partments. In these uncontrollable practical situations, the
`changes caused are normally not compensated for automati-
`cally by calculating the normalized RAR ratio since the AC
`portions of each photoplethysmogram, and the correspond-
`ing DC components,are affected differently by pressure or
`site-to-site variations. furthermore, these changes depend
`not only on wavelength, but depend also on the sensor
`geometry, and thus cannot be eliminated completely by
`computing, the normalized R/IR ratio, as is typically the case
`in dual-wavelength pulse oximeters.
`The inventor has found that the net result of this nonlinear
`effect is to cause large variations in the slope of the cali-
`bration curves. Consequently, if these variations are not
`compensated automatically, they will cause large errors in
`the final computation of SpO.,, particularly at low oxygen
`saturation levels normally found in fetal applications.
`Another object of the present invention is to compensate
`for these variations and to provide accurate measurement of
`oxygen saturation. The invention consists of, in addition to
`two measurement sessions typically carried out in pulse
`oximetry based on measurements with two wavelengths
`centered around the peak emission values of 660 nm (red
`spectrum) and 940 nm+20 nm (IR spectrum), one additional
`measurementsession is carried out with an additional wave-
`length. At
`least one additional wavelength is preferably
`chosen to be substantially in the IR region of the electro-
`magnetic spectrum,ie., in the NIR-IR spectrum (having the
`peak emission valuc above 700 nm). In a preferred embadi-
`ment
`the use of at
`least
`three wavelengths enables the
`calculation of an at least one additional ratio formed by the
`combination of the two IR wavelengths, which is mostly
`dependent on changes in contact pressure or site-to-site
`variations. In a preferred embodiment, slight dependence of
`the ratio on variations in arterial oxygen saturation that may
`occur, is easily minimized or eliminated completely, by the
`proper selection and matching of the peak emission wave-
`lengths and spectral characteristics of the at
`lcast
`two
`IR-light sources.
`Preferably, the selection of the IR wavelengthsis based on
`certain criteria. The IR wavelengths are selected to coincide
`with the region of the optical absorption curve where HbO.,
`absorbsslightly more light than Hb. The IR wavelengths are
`
`0011
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1053
`
`0011
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1053
`
`

`

`US 6,801,799 B2
`
`5
`
`10
`
`8
`illuminating a measurement location with at least three
`different wavelengths 41, A2 and A3, the first wave-
`length A1 lying in a red (R) spectrum,andtheat least
`second and at least third wavelengths 42 and A3 lying
`substantially in the infrared (IR) spectrum;
`detecting light returned from the measurementlocation at
`different detection locations and generating data indica-
`tive of the detected light, wherein said different detcc-
`tion locations are arranged so as to define at least one
`closed path around the measurement location; and
`analyzing the generated data and determining the bload
`parameter.
`
`BRILI DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`Other advantages of the present invention will be readily
`appreciated as the same becomes better understood by
`reference to the following detailed description when con-
`sidered in connection with the accompanying drawings
`toCc
`) wherein:
`
`7
`in the spectral regions where the extinction coefficients of
`both Hb and HbO, are nearly equal and remain relatively
`constant as a function of wavelength, respectively.
`In a preferred embodiment, tracking changesin the ratio
`formed by the two IR wavelengths, in real-time, permits
`automatic correction of errors in the normalized ratio
`obtained from the R-wavelength and each of the
`IR-wavelengths. The term “ratio” signifies the ratio of two
`values of AC/DC corresponding to two different wave-
`lengths. ‘This is similar to adding another equation to solve
`a problem with at Icast three unknowns(i.c., the relative
`concentrations of HbO, and Hb, whichare usedto calculate
`SaO,, and the unknown variable fraction of blood-to-tissue
`volumes that effects the accurate determination of SaO,),
`which otherwise must rely on only two equations in the case
`of only two wavelengths used in conventional dual-
`wavelength pulse oximetry. In a preferred embodiment, a
`third wavelength provides the added ability to compute
`SaO, based on the ratio formed from the R-wavelength and
`cither of the IR-wavelengths. In a preferred embodiment,
`changes in these ratios are tracked and compared in real-
`time to determine whichratio produces a more stable or less
`noisy signal. Thatratio is used predominantly for calculating
`SaQ,.
`bomn
`The present inventionutilizes collectionof light reflected +
`from the measurement location at different detection loca-
`tions arranged along a closed path around light emitting
`elements, which can be LEDsorlaser sources. Preferably,
`these detection locations are arranged in two concentric
`rings, the so-called “near” and “far” rings, around the light
`emitting elements. This arrangement enables optimal posi-
`tioning of the detectors for high quality measurements, and
`enables discrimination between photodetectors receiving
`“good”

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket