throbber
United States Patent [19]
`4,955,379
`Hall
`Date of Patent:
`[45]
`Sep. 11, 1990
`
`Patent Number:
`
`[111
`
`[54]
`
`MOTION ARTEFACT REJECI'ION SYSTEM
`FOR PULSE OXIMETERS
`
`[55]
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`[75]
`
`Inventor:
`
`Peter R. Hall, Dyfed, United
`Kingdom
`
`[73] Assignee: National Research Development
`Corporation, London. England
`
`{21] App]. No.: 229,692
`
`[221 Filed:
`
`Aug. 3, 1933
`
`Foreign Application Priority Date
`[30]
`Aug. 14, 1987 [GB] United lflngdom
`
`3719333
`
`Int. (21.5
`[511
`[52} us. Cl.
`
`A6113 5/00
`123/533; 128/664;
`128/666; 128/687
`[58] Field of Search ............. .. 1281’633, 634, 664, 665,
`128/666, 63?; 356/39. 41
`
`3/1978 Band et a1.
`4,109,613
`9/1979
`45162.331
`4/1981
`4.260.951
`4,353,152 Ill/1982
`6,641,658 2/1987
`4.651341
`3/1981'
`4,723,554- 2/1983
`
`
`
`128/666
`356/41
`.. 1281'690
`128/666
`128/633
`.. 128/633
`.. 128/633
`
`Primaar Examiner—Kyle L. Howell
`Ass-Man: Examiner—J0111: C. Hanley
`Attorney; Agent, or Firm—Howard F. Mandelbaum
`
`ABSTRACT
`[57]
`A pulse oximeter apparatus characten'zed in that it com-
`prises a bandpass filter adapted selectively to exclude
`motion artel'act from wanted signal is disclosed.
`Also disclosed is the use of such an apparatus for the
`determination of pulse rate and/or arterial blood oxy-
`gen saturation.
`
`6 Claims, 4 Drawing Sheen
`
` 11! In
`
`lune liar
`5511.!
`
`
`'red it
`mull Ill
`
`
`
`
`
`:m
`main]
`unlit
`
`
`siqnl val
`
` if It!
`
`0001
`
`Apple Inc.
`APLl 048
`
`US. Patent No. 8,923,941
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1048
`
`Apple Inc.
`APL1048
`U.S. Patent No. 8,923,941
`
`0001
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1048
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Sep. 11,1990
`
`Sheet 1 014
`
`4,955,379
`
`i’ulse rate
`
`Frequency [Hz]
`(Bflflnm channel)
`
`Pulse rate
`
`1.7
`
`[1
`
`Frequency {Hz}
`[13!]Dnm channel)
`
`.
`Fl 9. 2
`
`0002
`
`FITBIT, EX. 1048
`
`0002
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1048
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Sep. 11,1990
`
`' Slleet 2 014
`
`4,955,379
`
`Pulse rate
`
`7.5
`
`5
`
`2.5
`
`1?
`
`B
`
`Frequency {Hzl
`llSflflnm channel}
`
`3
`
`after
`
`lillering
`
`belore
`
`filtering
`
`
`
`lime
`
`Fl 9. 4
`
`0003
`
`FITBIT, EX. 1048
`
`0003
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1048
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Sep. 11, 1990
`
`Sheet 3 of 4
`
`4,955,379
`
`red All
`
`
`
`red AB
`
`signal in
`
`
`
`
`
`129 lap
`129 tap
`lawpass filler
`bandpass filter
`5.5 Hz
`[[75 -L H z
`
`
`
`signal out
`
`
`
`ir All
`signal in
`
`
`
`
`
`129 tap
`lnwpass filter
`5.5 Hz
`
`129 fall
`bandpass filter
`DIE-Hi:
`
`zero
`
`crossing
`cnunler
`
` ir AC
`signal out
`
`loop filter
`llawpassl
`
`
`
`
` calculate
`sample
`
`rate
`
`
`Fig.5
`
`0004
`
`FITBIT, EX. 1048
`
`0004
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1048
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`1
`
`.4
`
`Cl
`
`97
`
`
`
`00;SEE:ENEEn:fi:25;.23“9E;:5:2E;ES.“.2
`
`
`
`32.Sas:2;=3n.Em:w:as:“32Ea
`D...)lr49¢?eEESEEEB
`
`L,332.:~me251ENE31C\C
`._mI“mmanS2:2Ihasa
`
`I
`
`2.2S
`
`4»womE4444h“Bma.“.4umSttwe2:
`
`mi:____‘_I
`
`E;.u«3E:$2522%-.94:m.3w—:2.
`
`:9:
`
`0005
`
`FITBIT, EX. 1048
`
`0005
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1048
`
`
`

`

`1
`
`4,955,379
`
`MOTION ARTEFACI' REJECI'ION SYSTEM FOR
`PUISE OXIIMEI'ERS
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`This invention relates to a motion artefact rejection
`system for pulse osimeters; more particularly, it relates
`to a system for filtering out signals due to patient move-
`ment, in motion artefact signals, from wanted sis-nah.
`The operation of pulse ordmeters which measure
`arterial blood oxygen saturation and pulse rate is prej u-
`diced when the patient performs any movement. Oxim—
`eters have difficulty in distinguishing the pulsating sig-
`nals due to arterial blood flow from the pulsating signals
`due to patient movement. Since the results are calcu-
`lated from this pulsatile signal and the size thereof, it is
`highly desirable to be able to distinguish signals from
`these two sources. The present invention, which en-
`compasses an apparatus and the use thereof. reduces the
`severity of this probl and offers signifith advan-
`tages to a clinician.
`In general terms. a pulse oximeter apparatus will
`typically comprise the following units: a sensor. con-
`taining two LEDs of different wavelength (commenly
`660 nm and 940 am), and a photodetector, which are
`applied directly to a patient. The sensor is connected to
`the main instrument by a cable. The instrument contains
`a system to adjust LED power. hence controlling light
`intensity, and a system to analyse the incoming light
`from the photodetector. Means are provided to isolate
`the pulsatile components of these incoming light signals.
`The nonvarying ("DC signals") at each wavelength are
`either maintained equal by the LED power adjusting
`system, whereby the effects thereol' cancel, or they may
`themselves be isolated and measured. The time-varying
`signals (“AC signals") then pass through an AGC (auto-
`matic gain control) system to ensure that they supply an
`adequate signal
`to an analogue-todigital converter,
`where they are digitised. The AC and DC signals are
`then taken into a microprocessor, which analyses the
`AC signals for amplitude and frequency (corresponding
`to pulse rate). Oxygen saturation is calculated by the
`mimproaessar by inserting the amplitudes of the vari-
`ous signals into the following formula:
`
`AClmCI
`Ace/DC;
`
`and reading the result from an experimentally-deter-
`mined reference table. The results may be displayed on
`LEDs or LCDs. There is additionally provided a. sys-
`tem to judge whether motion artefact is present by
`examination of variability of AC signal frequency. If
`motion is judged to be present, displayed values are
`frozen and, if this state of affairs continues for any
`length of time, a warning message is given.
`In use. the sensor is closely applied to a well-perfused
`region of a patient, such as a fingertip. Light from the
`LEDs needs to pass through a well-perfiJsed region to
`ensure a good AC signal is obtained. The emergent light
`pulsates in intensity due to arterial pulsation. Since dur-
`ing systole the internal vessels are dilated, the total path
`length for the light is increased and intensity falls. Arte-
`rial blood is examined exclusively since it alone is the
`cause of the AC signals.
`Patient movement interferes with the operation of
`pulse oximeters in several ways. If either the LEDs or
`photodetector is not fixed directly in contact with the
`
`5
`
`10
`
`IS
`
`20
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`2
`skin. their distance from it may vary slightly when the
`patient moves. By simple I/dl function through air,
`measured light levels may change disastroust in real-
`life situations.
`Additionally, even if the optical components are ide-
`ally fixed to the skin, the path length between them may
`change if the tissue is slightly deformed by the move-
`ment. Again. light level changes by this mechanism may
`seriously interfere with measurements. In this case, the
`ftmction of intensity versus distance is more compli-
`cated than ld/z, since, as tissue is deformed, its optical
`characteristics change. This is because of the mobility
`of the blood, the major absorbing species at the wave-
`lengths in use; for instance, as the fingertip is com-
`pressed, the path length between the optical compo-
`nents will reduce, but, additionally, venous and capil-
`lary blood is squeezed out of the light path.
`Furthermore. during severe motion, one or both opti-
`cal transducers may be pulled laterally along the tissue
`under measurement, effectively changing the measure-
`ment site. This typically occurs when the cable connect-
`ing the sensor to the instrument is pulled and may cause
`major optical disturbance.
`Since the AC signal is typically only 24% of the
`amplitude of the DC signal, it is this which is propor-
`tionally most seriously affected by movement artefact.
`Considering this, it is a reasonable approximation to
`apply a filtering algorithm to the AC signals and to
`ignore errors in the DC signals.
`Surprisingly,
`it has now been discovered that the
`wanted AC signals, otherwise known as plethysmo-
`graph waveforms, have typical frequency versus power
`spectra as illustrated in accompanying FIG. 1. That is,
`about 90% of their energy is contained at the fundamen-
`tal frequency (the pulse rate) with relatively little har-
`monic energy. Additionally,
`the unwanted signal
`caused by motion artefact frequently lies outside the
`frequency band of the pulse rate. Accompanying FIGS.
`2 and 3 illustrate the frequency versus power spectra of
`signals with which motion artefacts, random and peri-
`odic, respectively, are interfering. It follows from these
`realisations that a bandpass filter may be adapted selec-
`tively to exclude motion artefact from wanted signals.
`Accompanying FIG. 4 illustrates the effectiveness of
`the present system in the removal of unwanted motion
`artel'act signals from wanted plethysmograph signals.
`SUMMARY OF THE lNVENTION
`
`In a first embodiment, the present inventiOn relates to
`a pulse oximeter apparatus characterised in that it com-
`prises a bandpass filter adapted selectively to exclude
`motion artefact from wanted signal.
`In order to achieve this, the filter must initially be
`tuned to the pulse rate. Moreover, as the pulse rate
`changes, the filter is souadapted that its pass-band will
`follow the frequency change.
`DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`FIG. 1 is a graphical view of the plethysmographic
`signals found in the environment of the preferred em-
`bodiment of the invtion.
`FIG. 2 is a graphical view of the plethysmographic
`signals with random motion artefacts found in the envi-
`ronmt of the preferred embodiment of the invention.
`FIG. 3 is a graphical view of the plethysmographic
`signals with periodic motion artefaots found in the envi-
`ronment of the preferred embodiment of the invention).
`
`0006
`
`FITBIT, EX. 1048
`
`0006
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1048
`
`

`

`3
`FIG. 4 is a graphical view of plethylsmographic sig-
`nals demonstrating the effectiveness of the preferred
`embodiment of the invention.
`FIG. 5 is a subtle block diagram view of the
`preferred embodiment of the invention.
`FIG. 6 is a schematic block diagram view of appara-
`tus comprising an environment for the preferred em-
`bodiment of the invention.
`
`DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED
`EMBDDmIENT OF THE INVENTION
`
`As mentioned above, a motion artefaet detector sys~
`tem decides by examination of the variability of the
`amplitude and frequency of the incoming AC signals
`whether motion artefact is present. If artefaet is not
`judged present, the bandpass filter is tuned to the pulse
`rate as determined by the normal osimeter algorithms.
`Additionaly, the AGC system adjusts the input signal
`levels to the bandpass filter such that there is a large
`overland margin, for example :16, above the incoming
`wanted AC signals. When artefact is present. the AGC
`system is frozen. fixing the gain level, and the bandpass
`filter is configured in a feedback loop as illustrated in
`accompanying FIG. 5. The output of the bandpass fil-
`ters is substantially sinusoidal and so a simple frequency
`detector, for example a zero crossing counter. is suitable
`to determine its output frequency. The output of this
`frequency detector passes through a low-pass loop fil-
`ter, whose output in turn directly turns the bandpass
`filter. The system thus formed is a frequency-locked
`loop or tracking filter.
`Thus, when motion artefact is present, the bandpass
`filters can stay tuned to the pulse rate,
`tracking its
`change. The filters selectively exclude motion artefact
`during operation and the amplitude of the AC signals
`emergent from the filters may be used by the oximeter
`as normal. The errors in oxygen saturation measure-
`ments, as well as pulse rate, caused by patient move-
`ment are thus advantageoust reduced.
`For purposes of amplification. the present system
`has been incorporated into a Novametr'tx osimeter
`model 5CD as an additional 6mm slave processor. A.
`hardware block
`is illustrated in accompanying
`FIG. 6.
`Regarding digital signal processing algorithms, the
`present system is illustrated in accompanying FIG. 5.
`AC signals are first passed through a high grade 5.5 Hz
`lowpeas filter, 129 tap FIR filter, which is a necessary
`anti-aliasing filter at the lowest bandpass filter sampling
`rates. The low-pass filter sampling rate is fixed at 100 Hz.
`The bandpass filter has fixed coefficients, and is tuned
`by varying its sample rate as illustrated in accompany-
`ing FIG. 5. Finite impulse response (FIR) filters have
`been used for their predictable frequency versus delay
`characteristics. The design of this filter is the result of a
`number of conflicting requirements which are outlined
`below:
`(i) optimal artefact filtering demands a narrow pass-
`bend and high stop-band rejection,
`implying long
`tap-length filters;
`(ii) adequate tracking of changes in pulse rate demands
`a wide pass-band and fast servo loop performance,
`implying short tap-length filters.
`One suitable filter is a 129 tap FER of sampling rate
`15—30 Hz, with —3 dB points $1695 of centre fre-
`quency and stopband rejection of -40 dB at 350% of
`centre frequency.
`I claim:
`
`l0
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`SD
`
`55
`
`65
`
`4,955,379 '
`
`4
`1. In a pulse osimeter for making a measurement of
`blood oxygen saturation which produces pulsatile sig-
`nals in response to a patient’s pulsating arterial blood
`flow in a first variable range of frequencies and motion
`srtefact signals at frequencies outside of said first vari-
`able range of frequencies, apparatus for minimizing the
`effect of said motion artefact signals on said measure
`ment of blood oxygen saturation comprising
`a tunable bandpass filter having an input to which
`said pulsatile signals and said motion artefact sig-
`nals are applied;
`a frequency determining means connected to the
`output of said tunable bandpass filter for determin-
`ing the frequency of the pulsatile signals at the
`output of said tunable bandpass filter;
`and a tuning means operativer connected to said
`frequency determining means and said tunable
`bandpass filter for tuning said tunable bandpass
`filter in response to said determined frequency to
`align the pass band of said band pass filter with the
`determined frequency of said pulsatile signals
`whereby motion artefsct signals are attenuated.
`2. Apparatus according to claim 1 further comprising
`a first low pass filter connected to the input of said
`tunable bandpass filter.
`3. Apparatus according to claim 1 further comprising
`a loop filter connected between said frequency deter-
`mining means and said tuning means.
`4. Apparatus according to claim 1 wherein said band
`pass filter is a digital pass filter tunable by changing its
`sampling rate, and said tuning means comprises means
`for changing said sampling rate in accordance with the
`output of said frequency determining means.
`5. Apparatus according to claim 6 wherein said fre-
`quency determining means comprises a zero crossing
`counter.
`6. In a pulse oximeter for making a measurement of
`blood oxygen saturation having a first channel wherein
`there are produced first pulsatile signals in response to
`red light absorbed by a patient’s pulsating arterial blood
`flow and a second channel wherein there are produced
`second pulsatile signals in response to infrared light
`absorbed by a patient’s pulsating arterial blood flow in a
`first variable range of frequencies, and in which motion
`artefact signals at frequencies outside of said first vari-
`able range of frequencies are produced in said first and
`second channels. apparatus for minimizing the effect of
`said motion artefact signals on said measurement of
`blood oxygen saturation comprising
`a first tunable bandpass filter disposed in said first
`channel and having an input to which said first
`pulsatile signals and said first channel motion
`srtefsct signals are applied:
`a second tunable bandpass filter disposed in said sec-
`ond channel and having an input to which said
`second pulsatile signals and said second channel
`motion artefact signals are applied;
`frequency determining means connected to the
`output of at least one of said first and second tun-
`able bandpass filters for determining the frequency
`of the pulsatile signals at the output of said at least.
`one tunable bandpass filter;
`and a tuning means operativer connected to said
`frequency determining means and said first and
`second tunable bandpass filters for tuning said tun-
`able bandpass filters to align the pass bands of the
`band pass filters with the determined frequency.
`
`0007
`
`FITBIT, EX. 1048
`
`0007
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1048
`
`

`

`f—._——*"‘#%—‘—I
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE
`
`CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION
`
`PATENT NO.
`
`‘ 4,955,379
`
`DATED
`INVENTOR(S)
`
`; Sep. 11, 1990
`: Peter R. Hall
`
`It is certified that error appears in the above—Identified patent and {hat said Lettels Patent
`is hareby connected as shown below:
`At
`column 1,
`line 1]., change "16/2" to -—1/d2--.
`
`At column 4,
`
`line 36, after "digital" insert ~-band--.
`
`Signed and Sealed this
`
`Eleventh Day of February, 1992
`
`
`
`
`
`‘
`
`
`
`'-
`
`Anesr:
`
`AIMEE-fig OfiCBf
`
`HARRY F. MANBECK. JR.
`
`Camin‘i‘oner ofParents and de'emarlcs‘
`
`__ -.J
`
`
`
`0008
`
`FITBIT, EX. 1048
`
`0008
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1048
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket