throbber
eIEEE
`
`Advancing Technology
`for Humanity
`
`DECLARATION OF GERARD P. GRENIER
`
`I have never been convicted
`1, Gerard P. Grenier, am over twenty-one (21) years of age.
`of a felony, and I am- fully competent to make this declaration. I declare the following to be true
`to the best of my knowledge, information and belief:
`
`1.
`
`I am Senior Director of Publishing Technologies of the Institute of Electrical and
`Electronics Engineers, Inc. (“IEEE”).
`
`.
`
`IEEE is a neutral third party in this dispute.
`
`. Neither I nor IEEE itself is being compensated for this declaration.
`
`. Among my responsibilities as Senior Director of Publishing Technologies, I act as a
`custodian of certain records for IEEE.
`
`.
`
`I make this declaration based on my personal knowledge and information contained
`in the business records of IEEE.
`
`. As part of its ordinary course of business IEEE publishes and makes available
`technical articles and standards. These publications are made available for public
`download through the IEEE digital library, IEEE Xplore.
`
`.
`
`US. Patent No. 8,923,941
`
`It is the regular practice of IEEE to publish articles and other writings including
`article abstracts and make them available to the public through IEEE Xplore. IEEE
`maintains copies of publications in the ordinary course1 of its regularly conducted
`' activities.
`
`. The article below has been attached as Exhibit A to this declaration:
`
`A. G. Comtois, et a]. “A Comparative Evaluation of Adaptive Noise
`Cancellation Algorithms for Minimizing Motion Artifacts in a Forehead-
`Mounted Wearable Pulse Oximeter” 28“ Annual International Conference
`
`of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2007, August
`22-26, 2007.
`
`.
`
`I obtained a copy of Exhibit A through IEEE Xplore, where it is maintained in the
`ordinary course of IEEE’s business. Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of the
`Exhibit as it existed on or about October 25, 2016.
`
`10. The article abstracts from IEEE Xplore shows the date of publication. IEEE Xplore
`populates this information using the metadata associated with the publication
`
`445 Hoes Lane Piscataway, NJ 08854
`0001
`
`Apple Inc.
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1033
`
`

`

`. I hereby declare that all statements made herein of my own knowledge are true and
`that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true, and further
`that these statements were made with the knowledge that willful false statements and
`the like are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. § 1001.
`
`I declareunderpenalty ofperjurythatthe foregoing statements areWW.
`Executed on: {95'If loft
`
`11. G. Comtois, et al. “A Comparative Evaluation of Adaptive Noise Cancellation
`Algorithms for Minimizing Motion Artifacts in a Forehead-Mounted Wearable Pulse
`Oximeter" was published in the 28“1 Annual International Conference of the lEEE
`Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2007. The 28'h Annual International
`Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2007 was held
`from August 22-26, 2007. Attendees of the conference were provided copies of the
`publication no later than the last day of the conference. The article is currently
`available for public download from the IEEE digital library, IEEE Xplore.
`
`x_’ Z; ‘
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1033
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1033
`
`

`

`IEEE Xplore Document - A Comparative Evaluation of Adaptive Noise Cancellation Algorithms for Minimizing Motion Artifacts in a Forehead-Mounted
`10/25/2016
`IEEE.org| IEEE Xplore Digital Library I IEEE-SAI IEEE Spectrum More Sites
`Cart (0) | Create Account | Personal Sign In
`
`BROWSE
`
`MY SETHNGS
`
`GET HELP
`
`WHAT CAN I ACCESS?
`
`SUBSCRIBE
`
`Institutional Sign In
`
`Browse Conferences > Engineering in Medicine and B...
`
`Back to Results
`
`A Comparative Evaluation of Adaptive Noise Cancellation
`Algorithms for Minimizing Motion Artifacts in a Forehead-
`Mounted wearable Pulse Oximeter
`
`Related Articles
`Ra..an
`' AWearame
`Recognition
`Reflectance
`of Physical
`Pulse Oximeter
`Activities and
`for Remote ._
`
`Amends
`cancellation
`using MEMS
`acceleromete...
`
`9
`Paper
`Citations
`
`2
`Patent
`C ltstions
`
`609
`Full
`Text Views
`
`3
`Author(s)
`
`'
`
`Gary Comtois; Yitzhak Mendelson ;
`
`Piyush Ramuka
`
`View All Authors
`
`Abstract
`
`Authors
`
`Figures
`
`References
`
`Citations
`
`Keywords
`
`Metrics
`
`Abstract:
`
`http:/fieeexplore.ieee.orgldocum ent/4352592/
`
`Wearable physiological monitoring using a pulse oximeter would enable field medics to monitor multiple injuries simultaneously, thereby prioritizing
`medical intervention when resources are limited. However, a primary factor limiting the accuracy of pulse oximetry is poor signal-to-noise ratio since
`photoplethysmographic (PPG) signals, from which arterial oxygen saturation (SpOz) and heart rate (HR) measurements are derived, are compromised
`by movement artifacts. This study was undertaken to quantify SpO2 and HR errors induced by certain motion artifacts utilizing accelerometry-based
`adaptive noise cancellation (ANC). Since the fingers are generally more vulnerable to motion artifacts, measurements were performed using a custom
`forehead-mounted wearable pulse oximeter developed for real-time remote physiological monitoring and triage applications. This study revealed that
`processin motion-corrupted PPG signals by least mean squares (LMS) and recursive least squares (RLS) algorithms can be effective to reduce SpO2
`and HR errors during jogging, but the degree of improvement depends on filter order. Although both algorithms produced similar improvements,
`implementing the adaptive LMS algorithm is advantageous since it requires significantly less operations.
`
`Published in: Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2007. EMBS 2007. 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE
`
`Date of Conference: 22-26 Aug. 2007
`
`INSPEC Accession Number: 9910101
`
`Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 22 October 2007
`
`DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2007.4352592
`
`ISBN Information:
`
`ISSN Information:
`
`PubMed ID: 18002258
`
`Publisher: IEEE
`
`55 Contents
`
`Download PDF
`
`I. Introduction
`
`Download Citations
`
`Wew References
`
`The implementation of wearable diagnostic devices would enable real-time remote physiological
`assessment and triage of military combatants, firefighters, miners, mountaineers, and other individuals
`operating in dangerous and high-risk environments. This, in turn, would allow first responders and
`front-line medics working under stressful conditions to better prioritize medical intervention when
`resources are limited, thereby extending more effective care to casualties with the most urgent needs.
`
`Read document
`
`P'i'“
`
`Kevwords
`
`Full Text
`
`AbStraCt
`
`Authors
`
`Figures
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1033
`
`

`

`10/25/2016
`
`lEEE Xplore Document - 'A Comparative Evaluation of Adaptive Noise Cancellation Algorithms for Minimizing Motion Artifacts in a Forehead-Mounted . ..
`"-1 ..~._-
`
`Request Permissions
`
`lEEE Keywords
`Noise cancellation, Biomedical monitoring. Pulse measurements, Heart rate. Least squares
`approximation, Injuries, Limiting, Signal to noise ratio, Fingers. Motion measurement
`
`INSPEC: Controlled Indexing
`plethysmography, accelerometers, blood vessels, cardiology, least mean squares methods, oximetry,
`oxygen, patient diagnosis
`
`References
`
`Citations
`
`Keywords
`
`INSPEC: Non-Controlled Indexing
`recursive least square algorithm, adaptive noise cancellation algorithms, motion artifacts, wearable
`pulse oximeter, photoplethysmographic signals, arterial oxygen saturation, heart rate, least mean
`squares algorithm
`
`Back to Top
`
`Algorithms, Artifacts, Clothing, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Forehead, Humans, Monitoring,
`Ambulatory. Movement, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity and Specificity
`
`Authors
`
`Gary Comtois
`Member lEEE, Graduate Student, Department of Biomedical Engineering,
`Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609 USA.
`comtoisg@wpi.edu
`
`Yitzhak Mendelson
`Member lEEE, Professor, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Worcester
`Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609 USA. phone: 508~831-5103; fax:
`508-831-5541: email: ym@wpi.edu
`
`Piyush Ramuka
`Graduate Student. Department of Biomedical Engineering. Worcester
`Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609 USA. pramuka@wpi.edu
`
`Related Articles
`» Real-Time
`Recognition of
`Physical Activities
`and
`Emmanuel
`Munguia Tapia; S...
`
`» A Wearable
`Reflectance Pulse
`Oximeter for
`Remote
`Y. Mendelson: R. J.
`Duckw..
`
`» Active noise
`cancellation using
`MEMS
`acceleromete...
`H.H. Asada; Hang-
`Hui Jia..
`
`» Unobstrusive heart
`rate and
`respiratory rate
`mom...
`Octavian
`Postolache: Pedr.,
`
`» Reducing motion
`artifact in wearable
`bio-sensors
`P. Gibbs; H.H.
`Asada
`
`» Estimation of
`respiratory
`waveform using an
`accel...
`P.D. Hung: S.
`Bonnet: R.
`
`» Pulse arrival time
`and
`ballistocardiogram
`applica...
`Eduardo Pinheiro;
`Octavia...
`
`» Development at
`real-time motion
`artifact reductio...
`Hyonyoung Han;
`Min-Joan K...
`
`» Survey and
`evaluation of real-
`time tall
`detection...
`James T. Perry;
`Scott Kel .
`
`http://ieeexpiorejeee.org/dooument/4352592/
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1033
`
`

`

`IEEE Account
`
`Purchase Details
`
`Profile Information
`
`Need Help?
`
`Personal Sign In | Create Account
`
`» Change Usemame/Password
`» Update Address
`
`» Payment Options
`» Order History
`» \fiew Purchased Documents
`
`» Communications Preferences
`» Profession and Education
`» Technical Interests
`
`» US & Canada: +1 800 678 4333
`» Worldwide: +1 732 981 0060
`» Contact & Support
`
`About IEEE Xplorel Contact Us | Help i Terms ostel Nondiscrimination Policy i Sitemapl Privacy & Opting Out ofCookies
`
`10/25/2016
`
`IEEE Xplore Document - A Comparative Evaluation of Adaptive Noise Cancellation Algorithms for Minimizing Motion Artifacts in a Forehead-Mounted
`
`»JAutomatic
`segmentation of
`heart sound
`signals usl...
`A.D. Ricke; R.J.
`Povlnell...
`
`A not-for-protit organization. IEEE l5 lhe world's largesltechnical professional organization dedicated to advancing technology for the benefit ofhumanily.
`Copyright 2016 IEEE - All rights reserved, Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.
`
`http:/Iieeexplore.ieee.orgldocument/4352592I
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1033
`
`

`

`Proceedings of the 29111 Annual Intematlonal
`Conference of the IEEE EMBS
`Cite Internationale, Lyon, France
`August 23-26, 2007.
`
`ThD13.1
`
`A Comparative Evaluation of Adaptive Noise Cancellation
`Algorithms for Minimizing Motion Artifacts in a Forehead-Mounted
`Wearable Pulse Oximeter
`
`Gary Comtois, Member IEEE, Yitzhak Mendelson, Member IEEE, Piyush Ramuka
`
`impractical for field applications because they limit mobility
`and can interfere with regular activity. Equally important,
`since these devices are designed for clinical settings where
`patient movements
`are
`relatively constrained, motion
`artifacts during field applications can drastically affect
`measurement accuracy while subjects remain active.
`Practically, the primary factor limiting the reliability of
`pulse oximetry is attributed to poor signal-to-noise ratio
`(SNR) due to motion artifacts. Since photoplethysmographic
`(PPG) signals, which are used to determine SpOz and HR,
`are obscured during movements, the implementation of a
`robust pulse oximeter
`for
`field applications
`requires
`sophisticated
`noise
`rejection
`algorithms
`to
`eliminate
`erroneous readings and prevent false alarms.
`To minimize the effects of motion artifacts in wearable
`pulse oximeters, several groups proposed various algorithms
`to accomplish adaptive noise cancellation (ANC) utilizing a
`noise reference signal obtained from an accelerometer
`(ACC) that is incorporated into the sensor to represent body
`movements [1]-[3]. These groups demonstrated promising
`feasibility for movement artifact rejection in PPG signals
`acquired from the finger. However,
`they did not present
`quantifiable data showing whether
`accelerometry—based
`ANC resulted in more accurate determination of SpOz and
`HR derived from PPG signals acquired from more motion-
`tolerant body locations that are more suitable for mobile
`applications.
`
`0007
`
`Abstracl— Wearable physiological monitoring using a pulse
`oximeter would enable field medics to monitor multiple injuries
`simultaneously, thereby prioritizing medical intervention when
`resources are limited. However, a primary factor limiting the
`accuracy of pulse oximetry is poor signal-to-noise ratio since
`photoplethysmographic (PPG) signals,
`from which arterial
`oxygen saturation (Sp02) and heart rate (HR) measurements
`are derived, are compromised by movement artifacts. This
`study was undertaken to quantify SpOz and HR errors induced
`by certain motion artifacts utilizing accelerometry-based
`adaptive noise cancellation (ANC). Since the fingers are
`generally more vulnerable to motion artifacts, measurements
`were performed using a custom forehead-mounted wearable
`pulse oximeter developed for real-time remote physiological
`monitoring and triage applications. This study revealed that
`processing motion-corrupted PPG signals by least mean
`squares (LMS) and recursive least squares (RLS) algorithms
`can be effective to reduce SpOz and HR errors during jogging,
`but
`the degree of improvement depends on filter order.
`Although both algorithms produced similar improvements,
`implementing the adaptive LMS algorithm is advantageous
`since it requires significantly less operations.
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`HE implementation of wearable diagnostic devices
`would enable real-time remote physiological assessment
`and triage of military combatants, firefighters, miners,
`mountaineers, and other individuals operating in dangerous
`and high-risk environments. This, in turn, would allow first
`responders and fiont-line medics working under stressfirl
`conditions to better prioritize medical
`intervention when
`resources are limited, thereby extending more effective care
`to casualties with the most urgent needs.
`Employing commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) solutions,
`for example finger pulse oximeters to monitor arterial blood
`oxygen saturation (SpOz),and heart rate (HR), or adhesive-
`type disposable
`electrodes
`for ECG monitoring,
`are
`
`Manuscript received April 2, 2007. This work is supported by the U.S.
`Army MRMC under Contract DAMD17-03-2-0006, The views, opinions
`and/or findings are those of the author and should not be construed as an
`official Department of the Army position, policy or decision unless so
`designated by other documentation.
`in the Department of Biomedical
`Y. Mendelson is a Professor
`Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609 USA
`(phone: 508-831-5103; fax: 508-831-5541; email: ym@wpi edu)
`G Comtois is a graduate student
`in the Department of Biomedical
`Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic institute, Worcester, MA 01609 USA
`(comtoisg@wpi.edu).
`in the Department of Biomedical
`P. Ramuka is a graduate student
`Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609 USA
`(pramuka@wpi. edu).
`
`11. BACKGROUND
`
`Generally, linear filtering with a fixed cut-off frequency is
`not effective in removing in-band noise with spectral overlap
`and temporal similarity that is common between the signal
`and artifact. Thus, we utilized ANC techniques to filter noisy
`PPG waveforms acquired during field experiments. The
`performance of
`this
`signal processing approach was
`evaluated based on its potential
`to lower Sp02 and HR
`measurement errors.
`
`Among the most popular ANC algorithms are the least
`mean squares (LMS) and recursive least squares (RLS)
`algorithms. Briefly,
`to
`attenuate
`the
`in-band
`noise
`component in the desired signal,
`these algorithms assume
`that
`the reference noise
`received from the ACC is
`statistically correlated with the additive noise component in
`the corrupted PPG signal, whereas the additive noise is
`uncorrelated with the noise-flee PPG signal. An error signal
`is used to adjust continuously the filter’s tap-weights in
`order to minimize the SNR of the noise-corrected PPG
`signal.
`
`1-4244-0788-5/07/$20.00 ©2007 IEEE
`
`1528
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1033
`
`

`

`The performance of ANC algorithms is highly dependent
`on various filter parameters,
`including filter order (M).
`Accordingly, careful consideration must be given to the
`selection of these parameters and the trade-off between
`algorithm complexity and its computation time.
`Although the basic principles of the LMS and RLS
`techniques share certain similarities,
`the LMS algorithm
`attempts to minimize only the current error value, whereas in
`the RLS algorithm, the error considered is the total error
`from the beginning to the current data point. Furthermore,
`the performance of each algorithm depends on different
`parameters. For example, the step size (u) has a profound
`effect on the convergence behavior of the LMS algorithm.
`Similarly, the forgetting factor 0») determines how the RLS
`algorithm treats past data inputs.
`Compared to the LMS algorithm, the RLS algorithm has
`generally a faster convergence rate and smaller error.
`However, this advantage comes at the expense of increasing
`complexity and longer computational time which increases
`rapidly and non—linearly with filter order.
`
`111. METHODS
`
`collected
`and PPG data were
`accelerations
`Body
`concurrently fi'om 7 healthy volunteers during 32 jogging
`experiments. These jogging experiments comprised 16
`treadmill,
`12
`indoor,
`and 4 outdoor
`exercises. Each
`experiment comprised a 1-minute free jogging at speeds
`corresponding to 3.75—6.5 mph, fi'amed by 2-minute resting
`intervals. For validation,
`reference SpOz and HR were
`acquired concurrently from the Masimo transmission pulse
`oximeter sensor attached to the subject’s fingertip which was
`kept in a relatively stationary position throughout the study.
`We chose the Masimo pulse oximeter because it employs
`unique signal extraction technology (SET®) designed to
`greatly extend its utility into high motion environments. A
`PolarTM ECG monitor, attached across the subject’s chest,
`provided reference HR data.
`The ACC provided reference noise inputs to the ANC
`algorithms. The X, Y, and Z axes of the triaxial ACC were
`oriented according to the anatomical planes as illustrated in
`Fig. 1. Accelerations generated during movement depend
`upon the types of activity performed. Generally, during
`jogging, acceleration is greatest
`in the vertical direction,
`although the accelerations in the other
`two orthogonal
`directions are not negligible. Therefore, the noise reference
`input applied to the ANC algorithms was obtained by
`summing all
`three orthogonal axes of the ACC. By
`combining signals
`from all
`three axes, measurements
`become insensitive to sensor positioning and inadvertent
`sensor misalignment that may occur during movements. To
`compensate for differences in response times, the SpOz and
`HR measurements
`acquired from each
`device were
`processed using an 8-second weighted moving average.
`
`ACC axial
`orientations
`
`Finger
`Sensor \ _
`
`
`
`\ Masimo
`Pulse Oximeter
`
`0008
`
`To simulate movement artifacts, we performed a series of
`outdoor and indoor experiments that were intended to
`determine the effectiveness of using the accelerometer-based
`ANC algorithms
`in processing motion-corrupted PPG
`signals acquired by a forehead pulse oximeter. The focus of
`this study was to compare the performance of each algorithm
`by quantifying the improvement in SpOz and HR accuracy
`generated during typical activities that are expected to
`induce considerable motion artifacts in the field.
`Data were collected by a custom forehead-mounted pulse
`oximeter developed in our laboratory as a platform for real-
`time remote physiological monitoring and triage applications
`[4]-[6]. The prototype wearable system is comprised of three
`units: A battery-operated optical Sensor Module (SM)
`mounted on the forehead, a belt-mounted Receiver Module
`(RM) mounted on the subject’s waist, and a Personal Digital
`Assistant (PDA) carried by a remote observer. The red (R)
`and infrared (IR) PPG signals acquired by the small ((1) =
`22mm) and lightweight (4.5g) SM are transmitted wirelessly
`via an RF link to the RM. The data processed by the RM can
`be transmitted wirelessly over a short range to the PDA or a
`PC, giving the observer the capability to periodically or
`continuously monitor the medical condition of multiple
`subjects. The system can be programmed to alert on alarm
`conditions, such as sudden trauma, or when physiological
`values are out of their normal range. Dedicated software was
`used to filter the reflected PPG signals and compute SpOz
`and HR based on the relative amplitude and frequency
`content of the PPG signals. A triaxial MEMS-type ACC
`embedded within the SM was used to get a quantitative
`measure of physical activity. The information obtained
`through the tilt sensing property of the ACC is also used to
`determine body posture. Posture and acceleration, combined
`with physiological measurements, are valuable indicators to
`assess the status of an injured person in the field.
`
`Fig.
`
`l: Experimental setup For data collection
`
`The outputs of the MEMS ACC and raw PPG signals were
`acquired in real-time at a rate of 80 s/s using a custom
`written LabVIEW® program. Data were processed off-line
`using Matlab programming. The ANC algorithms were
`implemented in Matlab with parameters optimized for
`computational speed and measurement accuracy. The LMS
`algorithm was implemented using a constant p. of 0.016. The
`
`1529
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1033
`
`

`

`0009
`
`
`
`
`II L2
`
`
`RestingI
`1 D
`0
`
`I"
`-
`‘u-_-f--..-‘_____’I
`‘5.“
`Mnsrmo
`
`..
`
`wimp-.-“
`
`Resting I
`
`I
`20
`
`I
`an
`
`80
`
`I
`7|]
`
`[J Resting
`an
`90
`
`100
`
`lJogging
`H]
`to
`Time (a)
`Fig. 2 Representative SpOz (top) and HR (bottom) measurements obtained
`during outdoor jogging. Filter order M = 16.
`sSpectral analysis of the data using FFT revealed that
`during jogging fi‘equency components associated with body
`acceleration and the subject’s HR shared a relatively small
`
`V. DISCUSSION
`
`Pulse oximeters are used routinely in many clinical
`settings where patients are at rest. Their usage in other areas
`is limited because of motion artifacts which is the primary
`contributor to errors and high rates of false alarms. In order
`to design wearable cost-effective devices that are suitable for
`field deployment, it is important to ensure that the device is
`robust against motion induced disturbances. PPG signals
`recorded from the forehead are generally less prone to
`movement artifacts compared to PPG signals recorded from
`
`1530
`
`frequency band ranging between 1.5—3.0 Hz. Further
`analysis of the data showed that in 8 out of the 32 jogging
`experiments (25%),
`the cardiac-synchronized frequencies
`and movement-induced acceleration frequencies shared a
`common band.
`The averaged errors observed from the series of 32
`experiments are summarized in Figures 3 and 4. Analysis of
`the data clearly revealed that utilizing either the LMS or
`RLS algorithm to process the noise-corrupted PPG signals
`can improve both SpOz and HR accuracy during jogging.
`Although the degree of improvement varied, because
`different methods are employed to compute SpO; and HR
`from the PPG signal,
`these
`figures
`show that
`the
`performance of both algorithms depends on filter order used
`to implement each algorithm.
`
`
`
`._ru.
`
`
`
` SpOzRMSE(%) a
`
`20
`16
`12
`8
`
`Filter Order (M)
`Fig. 3 Averaged SpOz errors for varying filter orders. Error bars indicate
`iISD, For comparison, M = 0 represents the error obtained without ANC.
`
` HRRMSE(%)
`
`8
`
`12
`Filter Order (M)
`Fig. 4 Averaged HR errors for varying filter orders. Error bars indicate
`:tlSD. For comparison, M = 0 represents the error obtained without ANC.
`
`16
`
`20
`
`the RLS algorithm were
`for
`selected filter parameters
`I. = 0.99 and an inverse correlation matrix P = 0.1. These
`filter parameters were found to be optimal in preliminary
`experiments. For comparison, data were processed by each
`algorithm using variable order filters.
`
`IV. RESULTS
`
`SpOz and HR data were derived from the R and IR PPG
`signals utilizing custom extraction algorithms. SpOz root
`mean squared errors (RMSE) were quantified based on the
`differences between the readings measured by the custom
`and Masimo pulse oximeters, whereas HR errors were
`defined with respect
`to the Polar HR monitor. For
`comparison, RMSE were determined by processing the PPG
`signals off-line either with or without the ANC algorithms.
`Fig. 2 shows a representative tracing of SpOz and HR
`measurements obtained from the custom pulse oximeter with
`and without ANC. Reference measurements obtained
`simultaneously fiom the Masimo pulse oximeter and Polar
`HR monitor during resting and outdoor jogging were also
`included for comparison.
`
`
`
`II II :
`
`Without ANC
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1033
`
`

`

`essential in real-time applications. However, this comes at
`the expense of a longer computational time since the RLS
`algorithm requires M2 operations per iteration. Considering
`for example that an implementation based on a Balm-order
`filter would provide an acceptable error
`reduction,
`this
`implies that
`the LMS algorithm would require only 24
`operations compared to 576 operations that will be required
`to
`implement
`an
`adaptive RLS
`algorithm. Table
`1
`summarizes the relative execution times of the LMS and
`RLS adaptive algorithms for processing one data point,
`
`Table 1. Execution times for LMS and RLS algorithms
`Filter Order
`
`
`
`a finger. Nonetheless, morphological distortions of the
`underlying PPG waveforms,
`from which SpOz and HR
`measurements are derived, could lead to measurement
`errors, false alarms, and frequent dropouts when subjects
`remain active. For example, as shown in Fig. 2, it is evident
`that the Masimo pulse oximeter, which employs advanced
`signal extraction technology designed to greatly extend its
`utility into high motion environments, was clearly unable to
`accurately track SpOz and HR while the subject was jogging.
`Although to a
`lesser
`extent, we
`also noticed more
`pronounced fluctuations in SpOz recorded by the wearable
`forehead pulse oximeter during jogging. These fluctuations
`are likely caused by PPG waveforms obscured by motion
`artifacts associated with heavier breathing.
`To address the need to improve the performance of a
`prototype reflectance pulse oximeter during jogging, we
`investigated the effectiveness of a MEMS ACC as a noise
`reference input to two popular ANC algorithms. We chose
`the LMS and RLS adaptive routines since other investigators
`showed the promising utility of these algorithms to reduce
`errors attributed to motion artifacts in pulse oximeters [l]-
`[3].
`Analysis of the data acquired during jogging experiments
`showed that ANC implemented using the LMS and RLS
`algorithms can help to improve considerably the accuracy of
`a pulse oximeter, as shown in Fig. 2. However, although the
`differences are not considered clinically significant, we
`found that processing the corrupted PPG signals by each
`algorithm produced slightly different improvements. These
`differences are anticipated since different computational
`principles are employed by a pulse oximeter.
`Since ANC-based filtering implements an adaptive notch
`filter with a notch frequency corresponding to the dominant
`fiequency of the measured ACC signal, we expected that an
`overlap of the HR and movement-induced ACC frequencies
`would attenuate
`the
`fimdamental
`cardiac-synchronized
`frequency of the PPG signals and,
`therefore significantly
`affecting SpO; and HR measurements. However, separate
`analysis of
`the data
`from experiments where body
`accelerations
`and cardiac rhythms were found to be
`synchronized confirmed that applying either the LMS or
`RLS algorithm did not adversely impact the ability to obtain
`accurate SpOz and HR readings while subjects remain
`active.
`
`0010
`
`VI. CONCLUSIONS
`
`This study was designed to investigate the performance of
`accelerometry—based ANC implemented using the LMS and
`RLS algorithms as an effective method to minimizing both
`SpO;
`and HR errors
`induced
`during movement.
`Measurements were performed using a custom, forehead-
`mounted wearable pulse oximeter that was developed in our
`laboratory to serve as a platform for
`real-time remote
`physiological monitoring and triage applications. The results
`obtained in this study revealed that processing motion-
`corrupted PPG signals by the LMS and RLS algorithm can
`reduce HR and SpOz errors during jogging. Although both
`algorithms
`produced
`similar
`improvements,
`the
`implementation of the adaptive LMS algorithm is preferred
`since it requires significantly less operations.
`
`[1]
`
`[2]
`
`REFERENCES
`
`.T. Y A. Foo, S J Wilson, “A computational system to optimize noise
`rejection in photoplethysmography signals during motion or poor
`perfusion states,” Med. Biol. Eng. Conlme 2006, pp. 140-145
`L. B. Wood, H H Asada, “Noise cancellation model validation for
`reduced motion artifact wearable PPG sensors using MEMS
`accelerometers," in Proc, 28'” IEEE/EMBS Arm. Int. Canf, New York,
`2006, pp. 3525-3528
`A R. Relente, L.G. Siren, Clmmctcriaation and adaptwe filtering of
`inclion artifacts in pulse oximetry using acceleromclcrs, I'mc. 2""
`Joint EMBS/BMES Conf, Houston, TX, 2002, 1769-1770
`Y Mendelson and V Floroff, A FDA based ad—hoc mobile wireless
`pulse oximeter, in Prue. IASTED International Conference Telehealth
`2005, Banfl, Canada, 2005, pp. 1-6.
`Y. Mendelson. R. J. Brickworth. G. ('nmtois. “A wearable reflectance
`pulse oximeter for remote pliysiolugieai monitoring," in Proc.
`.23”
`IEEE EMBS Annual International Canf, New York, 2006, pp. 912-
`915.
`G Comtois, Y Mendelson, “A noise reference input to an adaptive
`filter algorithm for signal processing in a wearable pulse oximeter,” in
`Proc. 33’"i Annual Northeast Bioengineering Conf, New York, 2007,
`pp. 106-107.
`
`As shown in Fig. 3 and Fig. 4, we found that the degree of
`improvement depends on the filter order
`(M) used to
`implement each adaptive algorithm, however filters order
`greater
`than
`24
`produced
`diminished
`improvements.
`Furthermore, we also found that the LMS algorithm was
`slightly more effective in reducing HR errors compared to
`the RLS implementation.
`it is important to take into
`Given similar performances,
`consideration the
`complexity of the LMS and RLS
`algorithms and the trade-off between algorithmic complexity
`and computation time. These principal
`tradeoffs
`are
`important since our goal is to implement ANC to improve
`the performance of a wearable pulse oximeter during
`motion. For example, compared to the LMS algorithm, the
`RLS algorithm has a faster convergence rate which is
`
`1531
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1033
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket