throbber
Mobile Monitoring
`with Wearable
`Photoplethysmographic
`Biosensors
`
`WearableTechnology
`
`©EYEWIRE
`
`H. HARRY ASADA,
`PHILLIP SHALTIS,
`ANDREW REISNER,
`SOKWOO RHEE, AND
`REGINALD C. HUTCHINSON
`
`Technical and Clinical Aspects of a Ring Sensor for
`Ambulatory, Telemetric, Continuous Health Monitoring
`in the Field, in the Hospital, and in the Home
`
`W earable biosensors (WBS) will permit contin-
`
`uous cardiovascular (CV) monitoring in a
`number of novel settings. Benefits may be real-
`ized in the diagnosis and treatment of a number
`of major diseases. WBS, in conjunction with appropriate
`alarm algorithms, can increase surveillance capabilities for
`CV catastrophe for high-risk subjects. WBS could also play a
`role in the treatment of chronic diseases, by providing infor-
`mation that enables precise titration of therapy or detecting
`lapses in patient compliance.
`WBS could play an important role in the wireless surveil-
`lance of people during hazardous operations (military,
`fire-fighting, etc.), or such sensors could be dispensed during
`a mass civilian casualty occurrence. Given that CV physio-
`logic parameters make up the “vital signs” that are the most
`important information in emergency medical situations, WBS
`might enable a wireless monitoring system for large numbers
`of at-risk subjects. This same approach may also have utility
`in monitoring the waiting room of today’s overcrowded emer-
`gency departments. For hospital inpatients who require CV
`monitoring, current biosensor technology typically tethers pa-
`tients in a tangle of cables, whereas wearable CV sensors
`could increase inpatient comfort and may even reduce the risk
`of tripping and falling, a perennial problem for hospital
`patients who are ill, medicated, and in an unfamiliar setting.
`On a daily basis, wearable CV sensors could detect a
`missed dose of medication by sensing untreated elevated
`blood pressure and could trigger an automated reminder for
`the patient to take the medication. Moreover, it is important
`for doctors to titrate the treatment of high blood pressure,
`since both insufficient therapy as well as excessive therapy
`(leading to abnormally low blood pressures) increase mortal-
`ity. However, healthcare providers have only intermittent val-
`ues of blood pressure on which to base therapy decisions; it is
`possible that continuous blood pressure monitoring would
`permit enhanced titration of therapy and reductions in mortal-
`ity. Similarly, WBS would be able to log the physiologic sig-
`nature of a patient’s exercise efforts (manifested as changes in
`heart rate and blood pressure), permitting the patient and
`healthcare provider to assess compliance with a regimen
`proven to improve health outcomes. For patients with chronic
`cardiovascular disease, such as heart failure, home monitoring
`employing WBS may detect exacerbations in very early (and
`
`often easily treated) stages, long before the patient progresses
`to more dangerous levels that necessitate an emergency room
`visit and costly hospital admission.
`In this article we will address both technical and clinical is-
`sues of WBS. First, design concepts of a WBS will be pre-
`sented, with emphasis on the ring sensor developed by the
`author’s group at MIT. The ring sensor is an ambulatory, tele-
`metric, continuous health-monitoring device. This WBS com-
`bines miniaturized data acquisition features with advanced
`photoplethysmographic (PPG) techniques to acquire data re-
`lated to the patient’s cardiovascular state using a method that is
`far superior to existing fingertip PPG sensors [1]. In particular,
`the ring sensor is capable of reliably monitoring a patient’s
`heart rate, oxygen saturation, and heart rate variability. Techni-
`cal issues, including motion artifact, interference with blood
`circulation, and battery power issues, will be addressed, and ef-
`fective engineering solutions to alleviate these problems will be
`presented. Second, based on the ring sensor technology the
`clinical potentials of WBS monitoring will be addressed.
`
`WBS System Paradigm
`For novel healthcare applications to employ WBS technology,
`several system criteria must be met. The WBS hardware solu-
`tion must be adequate to make reliable physiologic measure-
`ments during activities of daily living or even more
`demanding circumstances such as fitness training or military
`battle. There must exist data processing and decision-making
`algorithms for the waveform data. These algorithms must
`prompt some action that improves health outcomes. Finally,
`the systems must be cost effective when compared with less
`expensive, lower technology alternatives.
`
`WBS Design Paradigm
`The monitoring environments for out-of-hospital, wearable
`devices demand a new paradigm in noninvasive sensor design.
`There are several design requirements central to such devices.
`Compactness, stability of signal, motion and other distur-
`bance rejection, durability, data storage and transmission, and
`low power consumption comprise the major design consider-
`ations. Additionally, since WBS devices are to be worn with-
`out direct doctor supervision, it is imperative that they are
`simple to use and comfortable to wear for long periods of
`time. A challenge unique to wearable sensor design is the
`
`28
`
`IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY MAGAZINE
`
`0739-5175/03/$17.00©2003IEEE
`
`MAY/JUNE 2003
`
`Apple Inc.
`APL1005
`U.S. Patent No. 8,989,830
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1005
`
`

`

`WBS solutions, in various stages of
`technologic maturity, exist for measuring
`established cardiopulmonary “vital signs”:
`heart rate, arterial blood pressure, arterial
`oxygen saturation, respiratory rate,
`temperature, and even cardiac output.
`
`trade-off between patient comfort, or long-term wearability,
`and reliable sensor attachment. While it is nearly needless to
`say that WBS technology must be safe, it should be noted that
`there have been tragic reports of serious injury resulting from
`early home monitoring technology [2]. Evolving regulatory
`guidelines for hospital and home monitoring technology can
`be found in the U.S. National Fire Protection Association
`Health Care Facilities Handbook.
`At the same time, the physiologic information generated
`by WBS technology must trigger some appropriate system ac-
`tion to improve health outcomes. Abnormal states must be ef-
`ficiently recognized while false alarms are minimized. This
`requires carefully designed WBS devices, as well as innova-
`tive postprocessing and intelligent data interpretation. Post-
`processing of sensor data can improve usability, as illustrated
`by recent improvements in pulse oximetry technology [3]-[5].
`Data interpretation can occur in real time (as is necessary for
`detecting cardiovascular-related catastrophes) or offline (as is
`the standard-of-care for arrhythmia surveillance using Holter
`and related monitoring). Real-time alarm “algorithms” using
`simple thresholds for measured parameters, like heart rate and
`oxygen saturation, have demonstrated high rates of false
`alarms [6], [7]. Algorithms for off-line, retrospective data
`analysis are also in a developmental stage. Studies of novel
`automated “triage” software used to interpret hours of contin-
`uous noninvasive ECG data of monitored outpatients suggest
`that the software’s diagnostic yield is not equal to a human’s
`when it comes to arrhythmia detection [8], [9]. It will presum-
`ably require further
`improvements in WBS hardware,
`middleware, and software in order to fully exploit the promise
`of wearable ambulatory monitoring systems.
`It is important to bear in mind the present limitations of the
`technology, such as reliability, system complexity, and cost,
`but there is a wide scope of exciting healthcare applications
`available for this technology, as will be discussed later in this
`article. WBS technology is a platform upon which a new para-
`digm of enhanced healthcare can be established. Considering
`that hardware solutions will
`inevitably become smaller,
`cheaper, and more reliable, and diagnostic software more so-
`phisticated and effective, it seems more a matter of when cost
`effectiveness will be achieved for WBS solutions, not if.
`
`Available WBS Monitoring Modalities
`WBS solutions, in various stages of technologic maturity, exist
`for measuring established cardiopulmonary “vital signs”: heart
`rate, arterial blood pressure, arterial oxygen saturation, respira-
`tory rate, temperature, and even cardiac output. In addition,
`
`there are numerous WBS modalities that can offer physiologic
`measurements not conventional in contemporary medical mon-
`itoring applications, including acoustic sensors, electrochemi-
`cal
`sensors,
`optical
`sensors,
`electromyography
`and
`electroencephalography, and other bioanalytic sensors (to be
`sure, some of these sensors have well-established medical util-
`ity, but not for automated surveillance). These less established
`WBS modalities are outside the scope of this review.
`Wearable electrocardiogram systems represent the most
`mature WBS technology. Holter and related ambulatory
`electrophysiologic monitoring solutions have established util-
`ity in the diagnosis of cardiac arrhythmias. There has been
`substantial examination of this technology in the medical lit-
`erature, with excellent reviews available [10]. Temperature is
`technically trivial to measure using WBS, but the continuous
`monitoring of body temperature is only a soft surrogate for
`perfusion, and it lacks established utility outside of traditional
`clinical settings [11], [12]. There is not a satisfactory ambula-
`tory solution for cardiac output measurement; it has been
`shown that cardiac output can be extracted from thoracic
`bioimpedance measurements, although speaking and irregu-
`lar breathing, as well as posture changes and ambulation, can
`corrupt this signal. In the future, bioimpedance is likely to
`prove a powerful WBS modality, since the signal carries in-
`formation about pulsatile blood volumes, respiratory vol-
`umes, intracellular and extracellular fluid balances, and has
`been shown to enable tomographic imaging. Respiration can
`be measured using bioimpedance, chest wall geometry, and
`acoustic means. While the basic sensor technology exists for
`monitoring respiratory rate, it requires the conversion of a
`continuous waveform into an integer (breaths per unit time),
`or the imprecise conversion of the measured parameter into an
`estimated volumetric rate (liters of gas per unit time).
`Ambulatory systems for arterial blood pressure measure-
`ment exist. The portapres, employing the volume clamp tech-
`nique for measuring ABP, offers a continuous waveform. The
`technology encumbers a finger and the wrist of the subject, is
`somewhat uncomfortable, and requires some expertise to set
`up for a subject (for instance, the finger cuff size must be care-
`fully matched to the finger). A more common WBS solution
`for 24-hour monitoring of ABP involves a portable version of
`the common oscillometric cuff that fits around the upper arm.
`This solution requires that the patient keep the monitored arm
`immobile while the cuff inflates for measurements. By report,
`this solution has been known to interfere with the sleep and
`other activities of monitored subjects (and has been reported
`to cause bruising of the arm at the cuff site) [13].
`
`IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY MAGAZINE
`
`MAY/JUNE 2003
`
`29
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1005
`
`

`

`small size, rings are generally worn without removal more of-
`ten than watches. Additionally, recent studies have indicated
`that the finger is one of the best places for WBS sensor attach-
`ment [16]. The primary vasculature of the finger is located
`near the surface and therefore makes it optimal for monitoring
`arterial blood flow using noninvasive optoelectronic sensors.
`Thus, a ring is ideal for long-term measurements. As will be
`illustrated in the following sections, the development of the
`ring sensor has stressed first an understanding of and then the
`subsequent elimination of front-end signal artifacts. By im-
`plementing a mechanical design that is sensitive to the true
`causes of signal corruption, significant improvements in over-
`all signal quality can be achieved and sensor effectiveness for
`various environments can be improved.
`Figure 1 shows the typical waveform of a photoplethys-
`mograph signal obtained from a human subject at rest. The
`signal comprises a large segment of dc signal and a small-am-
`plitude ac signal. The dc component of photon absorption re-
`sults from light passing through various nonpulsatile media,
`including tissue, bones, venous blood, and nonpulsatile arte-
`rial blood. Assuming that these are kept constant, a bandpass
`filter can eliminate the dc component. However, wearable
`PPG sensors do not meet this premise since, as the wearer
`moves, the amount of absorption attributed to the nonpulsatile
`components fluctuates. Power spectrum analysis reveals that
`this motion artifact often overlaps with the true pulse signal at
`a frequency of approximately 1 Hz. Therefore, a simple noise
`filter based on frequency separation does not work for PPG
`ring sensors to eliminate motion artifact.
`Furthermore, wearable PPG sensors are exposed to diverse
`ambient lighting conditions, ranging from direct sunlight to
`flickering room light. In addition, wearable PPG sensors must
`be designed for reduced power consumption. Carrying a large
`battery pack is not acceptable for long-term applications. The
`whole sensor system must run continually using a small bat-
`tery. Several ways to cope with these difficulties are:
`➤ secure the LEDs and the photodetector (PD for short) at a
`location along the finger skin such that the dc component
`may be influenced less by the finger motion
`➤ modulate the LEDs to attenuate the influence of
`uncorrelated ambient light as well as to reduce power
`consumption
`➤ increase the amplitude of the ac component so that the
`signal-to-noise ratio may increase
`➤ measure the finger motion with another sensor or a sec-
`ond PD and use it as a noise reference for verifying the
`signal as well as for canceling the disturbance and noise.
`In the following sections these methods will briefly be dis-
`cussed, followed by specific sensor designs and performance
`tests. There are other techniques for reducing motion artifact
`for general-purpose PPG. These, however, are mostly signal
`processing techniques applicable to PPG intended for short-
`term use. The motion artifact problem we are facing in wear-
`able PPG design is different in nature; the source signal qual-
`ity must be improved before applying signal processing.
`Therefore, the focus must be placed on basic sensor design.
`
`Techniques for Reduced Motion Artifact
`Sensor Arrangement
`The location of the LEDs and a PD relative to the finger is an
`important design issue determining signal quality and robust-
`ness against motion artifact. Figure 2 shows a cross-sectional
`
`No fully satisfactory WBS solution exists for ABP monitor-
`ing. Because this physiologic parameter has been the corner-
`stone of many decades of clinical and physiology practice, it
`will be important to develop future WBS solutions for monitor-
`ing ABP. It is also worth investigating surrogate measures of
`ABP that prove easier to measure, such as pulse wave velocity
`(which correlates well with degree of hypertension [14], [15])
`and the second-derivative of the photoplethysmograph. This ar-
`ticle focuses on a wearable ring pulse-oximeter solution, which
`measures the PPG as well as the arterial oxygen saturation. The
`PPG contains information about the vascular pressure wave-
`forms and compliances. Efforts to extract unique circulatory in-
`formation, especially an ABP surrogate, from the PPG
`waveform are discussed later in this article. The PPG provides
`an effective heart rate (measuring heart beats that generate
`identifiable forward-flow), useful for circulatory consider-
`ations though less useful for strict electrophysiologic consider-
`ations. For instance, the PPG signal may reveal heart rate
`variability, provided ectopic heart beats, which corrupt the as-
`sociation with autonomic tone, can be excluded.
`
`Development of a Wearable Biosensor—
`The Ring Sensor
`Technical Issues of PPG Ring Sensors
`Central
`to the ring sensor design is the importance of
`long-term wearability and reliable sensor attachment. Since
`continuous monitoring requires a device that must be
`noninvasive and worn at all times, a ring configuration for the
`sensor unit is a natural choice. Because of the low weight and
`
`Pulsatile Arterial Blood
`Nonpulsatile Arterial Blood
`
`Venous Blood
`
`Tissue, Bone, Etc...
`
`AC
`
`DC
`
`LightAbsorption
`
`Time
`
`Fig. 1. Illustrative representation of the relative photon
`absorbance for various sections of the finger. The dc compo-
`nent is significantly larger than the ac component.
`
`Control Volume 2
`
`Digital Artery
`
`Bone
`
`Bone
`
`21
`
`21
`
`Photodiode
`
`Control Volume 1
`
`LED
`
`(a)
`
`(b)
`
`Fig. 2. (a) For the reflective illumination method, movement of
`the photodiode relative to the LED (position 1 to position 2)
`leads to a photon path that no longer contains the digital ar-
`tery. (b) For the transmittal illumination method, movement of
`the photodetector relative to the LED still contains photon
`paths that pass through the digital artery.
`
`30
`
`IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY MAGAZINE
`
`MAY/JUNE 2003
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1005
`
`

`

`view of the finger with the ring sensor. The LEDs and PD are
`placed on the flanks of the finger rather than the dorsal and
`palmar sides. These locations are desirable for two reasons:
`➤ both flanks of fingers have a thin epidermal tissue layer
`through which photons can reach the target blood vessels
`with less attenuation
`➤ the digital arteries are located near the skin surface paral-
`lel to the length of the finger.
`It should be noted that an arterial pulsation is not only
`greater in magnitude than cutaneous pulsations but is also less
`susceptive to motion due to the naturally higher internal pres-
`sure. While the capillary collapses with a small external pres-
`sure on the order of 10~30 mmHg, the artery can sustain an
`external pressure up to 70~80 mmHg [17], [18]. Therefore,
`light static loads, such as contact with the environment, may
`not disturb the arterial pulsation.
`For these reasons, at least one optical device, either the PD
`or the LED, should be placed on one lateral face of the finger
`near the digital artery. The question is where to place the other
`device. Figure 2 shows two distinct cases. One case places both
`the PD and the LED on the same side of the fin-
`ger-base, and the other places them on opposite
`sides of the finger. Placing both the PD and the
`LED on the same side creates a type of reflective
`PPG, while placing each of them on opposite
`sides makes a type of transmittal PPG. In the fig-
`ure the average pathway of photons is shown for
`the two sensor arrangements. Although the exact
`photon path is difficult to obtain, due to the heter-
`ogeneous nature of the finger tissue and blood, a
`banana-shaped arc connecting the LED and PD,
`as shown in the figure, can approximate its aver-
`age path [19]. Although these two arrangements
`have no fundamental difference from the optics
`point of view, their practical properties and per-
`formance differ significantly with respect to mo-
`tion artifact, signal-to-noise ratio, and power
`requirements [20]-[22].
`Reflective PPG needs more secure attach-
`ments of the LED and PD to the skin surface,
`when compared to transmittal PPG. Once an air
`gap is created between the skin surface and the
`optical components due to some disturbance, a
`direct optical path from the LED to the PD may
`be created. This direct path exposes the PD di-
`rectly to the light source and consequently
`leads to saturation. To avoid this short circuit,
`the LED light beam must be focused only in the
`normal direction, and the PD must also have a
`strong directional property (i.e., polarity), so
`that it is sensitive to only the incoming light
`normal to the device surface. Such strong di-
`rectional properties, however, work adversely
`when a disturbance pressure acts on the sensor
`bodies, since it deflects the direction of the
`LED and PD leading to fluctuations in the out-
`put signal. As a result, reflective PPG configu-
`rations are more susceptive to disturbances.
`In contrast, transmittal PPG configurations
`do not have the short circuit problems, since the
`LED and PD are placed on the opposite sides of
`the finger; no direct path through the air can be
`
`created. Additionally, this design allows us to use devices hav-
`ing a weak polarity, which is, in general, more robust against
`disturbances. Furthermore, transmittal PPG is less sensitive to
`local disturbances acting on the finger, since the LED irradi-
`ates a larger volume of the finger. In the transmittal PPG con-
`figuration, the percentage of the measured signal does not
`significantly change although some peripheral capillary beds
`are collapsed. The percentage change is greater for reflective
`PPG, since this volume is smaller.
`Figure 3 shows an experimental comparison between trans-
`mittal and reflective PPGs. Two sets of PPG sensors, one re-
`flective and one transmittal, were attached to the same finger.
`Both were at rest initially, and then shaken. The transmittal
`PPG was quite stable, while the reflective PPG was susceptive
`to the motion disturbances.
`
`Lighting Modulation
`As is the case with most other WBS technologies, on-board
`power is an extremely important design consideration and is of-
`ten the limiting factor in design size, function, and flexibility.
`
`Reflective
`
`Start of
`Applied Motion
`
`Transmittal
`4
`6
`
`2
`
`8
`
`10
`
`12
`
`14
`
`16
`
`18
`
`20
`
`Time (s)
`
`10
`
`8 6 4 2 0
`
`0
`
`Voltage(V)
`
`Fig. 3. Corruption of a continuous PPG waveform during the application of a
`simple chopping motion. Note that while the motion corrupts the reflective
`sensor signal, the transmittal sensor signal remains unaffected.
`
`LED Brightness
`
`Photodetector Output
`
`Data Sampling
`(a)
`
`T1
`
`High-Speed
`Photo-
`detector
`
`Short, Bright
`LED Pulse
`
`Ts
`
`(b)
`
`Fig. 4. (a) The slow response time of the photodetector meant that the LED
`had to be modulated at lower frequencies for data sampling. (b) A faster
`photodetector response time makes it possible to increase the modulation
`frequency of the LED.
`
`IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY MAGAZINE
`
`MAY/JUNE 2003
`
`31
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1005
`
`

`

`described above is an effective method for preventing these
`types of injuries.
`In addition to saving power, the modulation of LED light-
`ing provides an effective means for reducing ambient light
`disturbances. Reading the PD output while the LED is turned
`off yields the baseline PPG level attributed to the ambient
`light alone. Subtracting this reading from the one acquired
`with the LED illuminated gives the net output correlated with
`the LED lighting. More sophisticated modulation schemes
`can be applied by controlling the LED brightness as a periodic
`time function. Computational power requirements often pro-
`hibit complex modulation, however. Design trade-offs must
`be considered to find the best modulation scheme.
`
`40
`
`50
`
`60
`
`Transmural Pressure
`Increasing the detected amplitude of arterial pulsations (i.e.,
`the ac component in Figure 1) improves the signal-to-noise ra-
`tio of PPG. It is well understood that the application of an ex-
`ternal pressure on the tissue surrounding the artery will
`increase the pulsatile amplitude. Such a pressure reduces the
`transmural pressure; that is, the pressure difference between
`inside and outside of the blood vessel. The pulsatile amplitude
`becomes a maximum when the transmural pressure ap-
`proaches zero, since the arterial compliance becomes maxi-
`mal with zero transmural pressure
`[25], [26]. Applying a pressure, how-
`ever, may interfere with tissue perfu-
`sion. Since the device is worn for long
`periods of time, the pressure must be
`kept such that it does not exceed levels
`that could damage other vasculature
`[27]. Thus, the mechanism for holding
`the LED and PD must be designed
`such that it provides a safe level of
`continuous pressure, well below the
`established clinical threshold.
`Figure 5 shows the pulsatile ampli-
`tude of a finger base PPG for varied
`pressures generated by a finger cuff. As
`the cuff pressure increases, the PPG
`amplitude increases until it reaches a
`maximum. As the pressure keeps in-
`creasing further,
`the amplitude de-
`creases due to occlusion of the blood
`vessels. The cuff pressure yielding the
`largest PPG amplitude, generally near
`the mean arterial pressure [28], is too
`high to apply for a long period of time.
`But, to prevent the capillary beds from being collapsed, the cuff
`pressure must be on the order of 10 mmHg, which is too low to
`obtain a sufficient PPG amplitude.
`A solution to this problem is to apply the pressure only at a
`local spot near the photodetector. When using a cuff or any of
`the devices that provide uniform surface pressure onto the fin-
`ger or the arm, it constricts the blood vessels, thus limiting or
`significantly impeding the amount of blood supplied down-
`stream. However, by providing a local, noncircumferential in-
`crease in pressure near the sensor’s optical components, it is
`possible to amplify the plethysmograph waveform while
`avoiding the potentially dangerous situation of long-term
`flow obstruction. As shown in Figure 6, the tissue pressure in
`the vicinity of one of the arteries can be increased with use of a
`
`40
`
`50
`
`60
`
`To keep the overall unit small, the ring sensor design demands a
`power source that is no larger than the coin batteries used for
`wristwatches. Despite the superior stability and robustness,
`transmittal PPG consumes more power. According to the Lam-
`bert-Beer law, the brightness decreases exponentially as the
`distance from the light source increases. Transmittal PPG must
`have a powerful LED for transmitting light across the finger.
`This power consumption problem can be solved with a lighting
`modulation technique using high-speed devices. Instead of
`lighting the skin continually, the LED is turned on only for a
`short time, say 100 ~ 1000 ns, and the signal is sampled within
`this period. High-speed LEDs and PDs, which have become
`available at low cost in recent years, can be used for this pur-
`pose. Figure 4 shows a schematic of high-frequency, low-duty
`cycle modulation implemented to minimize LED power con-
`sumption. Utilizing fast rise-time optical detectors, it is possi-
`ble to incorporate a modulation frequency of 1 kHz with a duty
`ratio of 0.1%, a theoretical power usage that is 1,000 times less
`than conventional full-cycle modulation methods [23].
`Use of a strong light source needed for transmittal PPG
`may cause a skin-burning problem. As reported in [24], if the
`sensor is attached for a long time the heat created by a power-
`ful LED may incur low-temperature skin burning. The afore-
`mentioned
`high-frequency,
`low-duty
`rate modulation
`
`2.5
`
`−2.5
`
`0
`
`300
`
`10
`
`20
`
`30
`Time (s)
`(a)
`
`0
`
`0
`
`10
`
`20
`
`30
`Time (s)
`(b)
`
`Voltage(V)
`
`Pressure(mmHg)
`
`Fig. 5. (a) PPG signal amplitude. (b) Pressure at the photodetector.
`
`Finger
`
`Sensor
`
`Locally
`Pressurized
`
`Photo-
`detector A
`
`Vein
`
`Photo-
`detector B
`
`LED
`
`Artery
`
`Pusher
`
`Fig. 6. The schematic of a locally pressurized sensor band.
`
`32
`
`IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY MAGAZINE
`
`MAY/JUNE 2003
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1005
`
`

`

`special mechanism pushing Photodetector A toward the skin.
`This mechanism, which is attached to the sensor band, would
`change the pressure distribution such that the transmural pres-
`sure of one of the arteries could be high enough to obtain a
`large pulsatile signal while keeping the pressure low else-
`where to allow for sufficient blood perfusion. As long as the
`pressurized area is small enough to perfuse it from the sur-
`rounding tissue, the local pressurization causes no major
`complication although the pressure is applied for many days.
`
`Noise Reference
`Wearable sensors are to be used with no supervision by medi-
`cal professionals, as mentioned previously. It is therefore im-
`portant to monitor whether signals have been obtained under
`proper conditions. Although the techniques described above
`are effective for reducing motion artifact, it is still necessary
`to verify the signal before sending it out for clinical diagnosis.
`Questionable data can be rejected if the wearable sensor has a
`means to monitor the hand motion and other sources of distur-
`bances. In the following section, a novel method for detecting
`finger motion for the verification of signal reliability as well
`as for recovering the correct signal from a distorted signal will
`be described.
`The motion of the finger can be measured with an acceler-
`ometer attached to the body of the ring.
`MEMS accelerometers are now avail-
`able at low cost, but they are still too
`bulky and/or consume too much power
`to use for the ring sensor. There is no
`commercially available product satis-
`fying both the power limit and form
`factor requirements. Instead of using a
`standard sensor dedicated for motion
`measurement, the PPG optical sensor
`can be used as a motion sensor. The fact
`that PPG is susceptive to motion distur-
`bances implies that the sensor has the
`potential to be an effective detector of
`motion. With minor modifications to
`the original PPG design, the PPG mo-
`tion detector would have a high sensi-
`tivity to detect
`the nonpulsatile dc
`component shown in Figure 1. The
`techniques developed for reducing mo-
`tion artifact are to be reversed in order
`to increase the motion sensitivity. First,
`the reflective PPG arrangement should
`be used, so the distance between the
`LED and PD must be shortened. The
`pressure should be kept low so that less
`pulsatile signals may be observed. The
`location of the PD should be away from
`the arteries and close to a vein instead. In addition, the wave-
`length of the LED should be selected such that it is more sensi-
`tive to the reduced hemoglobin (i.e., approximately 660 nm),
`since the nonpulsatile vein is filled mostly with the reduced he-
`moglobin. Figure 6 shows a desirable location for
`the
`photodetector detecting the finger motion. Photodetector B in
`the figure is placed close to the LED as well as to a vein on the
`low-pressure side. Figure 7 shows an experimental result of the
`reflective PPG exposed to hand motion. It is clear that the PPG
`signal has a strong correlation with the acceleration of the hand.
`
`Vertical
`Motion
`
`Horizontal
`Motion
`
`Motion Detection PD
`
`The motion detector can be used not only for monitoring
`the presence of motion but also for canceling noise. By us-
`ing PD-B as a noise reference, a noise cancellation filter
`can be built to eliminate the noise of PD-A that correlates
`with the noise reference signal. Assuming that the hemo-
`dynamic process observed by PPG is stationary and that the
`noise is additive, adaptive noise canceling methods, such as
`the classical Widrow method [29], can be applied in order
`to recover the true pulsation signal from corrupted wave-
`forms. As shown in Figure 8, the noise-canceling filter
`combines two sensor signals; one is the main signal cap-
`tured by PD-A and the other is the noise reference obtained
`by PD-B. The main signal mostly consists of the true pulsa-
`tile signal, but it does contain some noise. If we know the
`proportion of the noise contained in the main signal, we can
`generate the noise of the same magnitude by attenuating the
`noise reference signal and then subtract the noise from the
`main signal to recover the true pulsatile signal. If the noise
`magnitude is not known a priori, it must be determined
`adaptively during the measurement. Various algorithms for
`adaptive filtering can be applied to tune the filter in real
`time. Some can determine optimal filter gains and parame-
`ters based on the evaluation of the recovered signal, as
`shown in Figure 8 by the feedback from the output to the
`
`Acceleration Applied
`
`No
`Accel
`
`Medium
`Accel
`
`No
`Accel
`
`Low
`Accel
`
`No
`Accel
`
`High
`Accel
`
`0
`
`10
`
`20
`
`30
`Time (s)
`(a)
`
`40
`
`50
`
`60
`
`0
`
`10
`
`20
`
`30
`Time (s)
`(b)
`
`40
`
`50
`
`60
`
`2 1 0
`
`−1
`−2
`
`2 1 0
`
`−1
`−2
`
`Voltage(V)
`
`Voltage(V)
`
`Signal
`Source
`
`Noise
`Source
`
`Photodetector A
`Main
`Signal
`
`+
`
`−
`
`Noise
`Reference
`
`Adaptive
`Filter
`
`Photodetector B
`
`Fig. 8. Block diagram of adaptive noise cancellation using
`second PPG sensor as noise reference.
`
`Fig. 7. Reflective PPG used as a motion detector: PPG output has a strong correlation
`with the vertical and horizontal acceleration of the finger. (a) Photoplethysmogram
`with vertical acceleration. (b) Photoplethysmogram with horizontal acceleration.
`
`IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY MAGAZINE
`
`MAY/JUNE 2003
`
`33
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1005
`
`

`

`Since continuous monitoring requires
`a device that must be noninvasive
`and worn at all times, a ring
`configuration for the sensor unit
`is a natural choice.
`
`adaptive filter block. Details of this adaptive filtering
`method are beyond the scope of this article. The dual
`photodetector design shown

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket