`
`
`
`
`
`
`Confirmation No: 1675
`Filed: September 15, 2015
`For: C1-INH CONEPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR THE PREVENTION AND
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`TREATIVLENT OF DISORDERS ASSOCIATED WITH C1 ESIERASE INHIBITOR
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DEFICIENCY
`
`
`spent over 20 years conducting clinical research and trials involving treatments for various
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In re application of: GALLAGHER, Cynthia, et a]. Examiner: MIKNIS, Zachary I.
`
`
`
`Application No: 14/855,168
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Group Art Unit: 8760
`
`
`
`
`
`VIA EFS WEB FILING — WWW.USPTO.GOV
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Commissioner for Patents
`
`
`PO. Box 1450
`
`
`
`
`
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF DR. JENNIFER SCHRANZ UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 1.132
`
`
`
`Dear Commissioner:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1, Jennifer Schranz, hereby declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 am currently a Vice President of Clinical Development and the Global
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Development Team Lead for Angioedema at Shire, the assignee of the above-identified patent
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`application US l4/855, 168 (the “present application”) as a result of Shire’s acquisition of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ViroPharma, the original assignee of the application. Before Shire acquired ViroPharma, I
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`served as ViroPharma’s Vice President of Clinical Research. Since March 2011, I have overseen
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the development of CINRYZE®, including the ongoing effort for developing subcutaneous
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`formulation of C1 esterase inhibitor (Cl—INH), the active ingredient in CINRYZE®.
`
`
`2.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I hold a doctorate of medicine degree from the University of Toronto and have
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Docket No: SHR—l 184US
`
`
`
`
`
`(PATENT)
`
`CSL EXHIBIT 1002
`CSL v. Shire
`
`Page 1 of 12
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`: Gallagher, er al.
`In re
`
`
`
`Appl. No. : 14/855,168
`
`
`
`: September 15, 2015
`Filed
`
`
`
`
`: 2 of 12
`Page
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attomey’s Docket No.: SHR—1184US
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`diseases including hereditary angioedema (HAE). Before joining ViroPharma, I held various
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`positions at other biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, including Merck & Co., Inc,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`GlaxoSmithKline, Vicuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Pfizer Inc, and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Cempra, Inc, where I was involved in early and late stage clinical development (pre-clinical and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`clinical) for various diseases. My experience and education, including publications in which I
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`am an author are summarized in my curriculum vitae, a true and accurate copy of which is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`provided with this declaration as Exhibit A.
`
`
`3.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In preparation of this declaration, I have read and understand the specification and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`pending claims of the present application and the following documents:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`0 ViroPharma Phase 2b Combination Study for Subcutaneous Administration of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Cinryze® With Hyaluronidase (rHuPH20), press release published 19 December
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2012 (“ViroPharma Press Release”);
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`0 Kreuz, W., ClinicalTrialsgov NCTOO748202, published 4 September 2008: SC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`vs IV comparison study of Berinert P (“Kreuz”); and
`
`
`
`
`o
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Jiang et al., Clinical Immunology 136:323-328, published 8 June 2010 (“Jiang”).
`
`
`
`
`4.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I have been asked to comment on, among other things, the development of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`subcutaneous formulation for the treatment of hereditary angioedema (HAE).
`
`
`
`
`5.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HAE is a rare and potentially life-threatening genetic disorder characterized by
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`recurrent acute attacks of non-whealing, non-pruritic edema affecting the cutaneous tissues or
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`mucous membranes. See, A. Agostoni er al, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2004; 114(3): S51-131,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`attached as Exhibit B. HAE symptoms include episodes of edema (swelling) in various body
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`parts including the hands, feet, face, abdomen, genitalia, and airway. See Figures 1 and 2 below.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Airway swelling is particularly dangerous and can lead to death by asphyxiation. In addition,
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 2 of 12
`
`Page 2 of 12
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`: Gallagher, er a1.
`In re
`
`
`
`Appl. No. : 14/855,168
`
`
`
`: September 15, 2015
`Filed
`
`
`
`
`: 3 of 12
`Page
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attomey’s Docket No.: SHR—1184US
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`patients often have bouts of excruciating abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting that are caused
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`by swelling in the intestinal wall.
`
`
`
`
`6.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Thus, HAE is a debilitating disease that dramatically affects patients’ lives. The
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`uncertainty of attack onset combined with the severity of the symptoms results in many patients
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`suffering from anxiety and depression. Many patients also avoid normal daily activities, as well
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`as necessary medical and dental procedures out of fear of triggering an attack. Accordingly,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`prevention of attacks is critical for both the mental and physical health of affected individuals,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`often referred to as humanistic burden, and is an important part of treatment of HAE. As this is a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`hereditary disorder, transfer of the genetic defect to children also brings significant burden to the
`
`
`
`parents.
`
`
`
`
`7.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HAE patients have a defect in the gene that encodes Cl-INH, which results in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`inadequate or non-functioning Cl-INH. In the majority of cases, this defect is transmitted in an
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`autosomal dominant fashion; however in 25% of cases a spontaneous mutation occurs. Absent
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the defect, Cl-INH functions as a constituent of human blood that regulates the complex
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`biochemical interactions of blood-based systems involved in disease fighting, inflammatory
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`response and coagulation. Because inadequate or defective Cl-INH does not adequately perform
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`this regulatory function, a biochemical imbalance can occur and produce unwanted peptides such
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`as bradykinin that induce the capillaries to release fluids into surrounding tissue, thereby causing
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`edema. Triggering events include stress, hormonal fluctuations (e. g. estrogen), toxins, injury,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`inflammation, ischemia, viral infections, among others.
`
`
`
`
`8.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The photos below show the debilitating effects of HAE attacks on patients who
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`suffer from the disorder, specifically upper airway or laryngeal edema:
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 3 of 12
`
`Page 3 of 12
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`: Gallagher, er a1.
`In re
`
`
`
`Appl. No. : 14/855,168
`
`
`
`Filed
`: September 15, 2015
`
`
`
`
`: 4 of 12
`Page
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attomey’s Docket No.: SHR—1184US
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Fig. 1: Female patient suffering from edema and requiring nasal intubation. See, K. Bork er al.
`
`
`Am JMed 2006;119: 267-274.
`
`
`
`\Ԥ
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Fig. 2: Progression of attack symptoms in male patient. See, Banerji A, Ann Allergy Asthma
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Immunol 111 (2013) 329-336, Figure 2.
`
`
`9.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`At present, the treatment options for HAE prophylaxis are limited. CINRYZE®
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(C1 esterase inhibitor [Human]) is the only Cl-INH replacement product approved for HAE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`prophylaxis. CINRYZE® is human plasma derived Cl-INH, indicated for routine prophylaxis
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`against angioedema attacks in adolescent and adult patients. CINRYZE® is provided as 500 U of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`lyophilisate per vial. Each vial is reconstituted in 5 mL of sterile water, to a concentration of 100
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`U/mL prior to administration. Two vials, or a total of 10 mL, are administered by intravenous
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`infusion every 3-4 days in order to achieve an appropriate threshold of functional Cl-INH
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`activity for routine prophylaxis against angioedema attacks in adolescent and adult patients.
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 4 of 12
`
`Page 4 of 12
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`: Gallagher, er a1.
`In re
`
`
`
`Appl. No. : 14/855,168
`
`
`
`: September 15, 2015
`Filed
`
`
`
`
`: 5 of 12
`Page
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attomey’s Docket No.: SHR—1184US
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10. While the current IV formulation of CINRYZE® provides an important and life-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`saving treatment for HAE, a subcutaneous (SC) formulation of Cl-INH could represent a more
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`convenient and patient friendly option for many HAE patients and healthcare providers. For
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`example, SC formulation allows for self-administration by patients, especially those who do not
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`want to, or cannot, access an intravenous site. SC administration has the important advantage of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`not requiring access to veins twice weekly or in some patients, maintaining a central venous
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`access port, when peripheral IV access is no longer possible. It also avoids significant
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`complications of central IV access, such as thromboembolism due to a foreign body, infections,
`
`
`
`61C.
`
`
`11.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`However, typically it is difficult or impossible to formulate protein drugs like
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CINRYZE® for SC administration. A successful SC formulation requires sufficiently high
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`protein concentration so that therapeutically effective dosages may be delivered in a small
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`volume into human patients safely. In other words, a successful SC formulation requires high
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`concentration, small volume, and acceptable viscosity and syringeability. Achieving this
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`combination of features has proven very difficult, particularly when dealing with large proteins,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`due to physical and chemical instability at high protein concentrations. For example, physical
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`instability causes protein aggregation. Aggregated protein increases risk of immunogenicity and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`may result in loss of potency. Chemical instability results in oxidation of the protein, particulate
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`formation, or product precipitation, which affects product homogeneity, safety, and efficacy.
`
`
`
`12.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The key to developing a formulation suitable for SC administration of Cl-INH is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`to increase Cl-INH concentration in order to permit the administration of therapeutically
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`effective dosage (e.g., > 1000 IU) in as small a volume as feasible, typically, no more than 2-4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`mL per injection site. In addition to the common challenges for SC formulation described above,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Cl-INH has certain characteristics that posed unique challenges in a high concentration SC
`
`
`formulation.
`
`Page 5 of 12
`
`
`
`Page 5 of 12
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`: Gallagher, er a1.
`In re
`
`
`
`Appl. No. : 14/855,168
`
`
`
`: September 15, 2015
`Filed
`
`
`
`
`Page
`: 6 of 12
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attomey’s Docket No.: SHR—1184US
`
`
`
`13.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Cl-INH is a large protein, the largest member of serpin superfamily. Human C1-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`INH is made up of 478 amino acids plus a 22-amino acid signal peptide. It has an apparent
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`molecular weight of about ~105 KDa. Cl-INH is highly glycosylated. In fact, Cl-INH is one of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the most highly glycosylated plasma proteins. More than 26% of the molecular weight of C1-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`INH is carbohydrate. Cl-INH bears both N— and O-linked glycans. See Figure 3 below. Like
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`many highly glycosylated proteins, Cl-INH has high viscosity. Moreover, plasma-derived C1-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`INH is particularly prone to aggregation due to the presence of certain co-eluates.
`
`
`
`
`9351155 {Length’fiflfié
`
`
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
` .
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`....
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Fig. 3: Structural schematic of Cl-INH. N—linked glycans are represented at N, O-linked
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`glycans are represented at T or S.
`
`
`
`14.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Thus, it was highly uncertain whether Cl-INH could be formulated at a high
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`concentration for SC injection. Indeed, for a long period of time prior to the present invention,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the consensus in the field was that it might not be feasible to develop high concentration with a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`small volume SC formulation for Cl-INH. Leaders in the Cl-INH therapeutic field, ViroPharma
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(the manufacture of CINRYZE®) and CSL Behring (the manufacturer of Berinert indicated for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`acute HAE attack at 50 U/mL) appreciated the long-felt need by HAE patients for a more
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`convenient non-parenteral delivery of Cl-INH, ability for self-administration and thereby better
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`Page 6 of 12
`
`Page 6 of 12
`
`
`
`: Gallagher, er a1.
`In re
`Appl. No.: 14/855,168
`Filed
`: September 15, 2015
`Page
`: 7 of 12
`
`Attomey’s Docket No.: SHR-1184US
`
`control of their disease.1 Each of ViroPharma and CSL Behring initiated human clinical studies
`
`of SC administration of C l-INH using low concentration formulations that had been developed
`
`for IV injection. As explained below, those earlier human clinical trials were either
`
`unsuccessful or did not continue to Phase 3.
`
`15.
`
`As Vice President of Clinical Research of ViroPharma, I was responsible for
`
`ViroPharrna’s earlier human clinical studies of SC administration of CINRYZE® described in the
`
`ViroPharma Press Release. In that study, subjects were subcutaneously infused with 20 mL of
`
`liquid containing either 1000 U of Cinryze with 24,000 U of rHuPH20 or 2000 U of Cinryze
`
`with 48,000 U recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20), a dispersing agent. Accordingly,
`
`the final concentration of C 1-INH administered was 50 U/mL or 100 U/mL, respectively. See
`
`ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01756157 which describes the same study in further detail:
`
`
`
`
`23
`5; mefis seemed fiea‘imea'ta in Fem: ‘3 am. Tania-381' E as Ferrari 2. {or 8 wears each as a
`ions} WWW éS‘G}
`per «we- .5: wasms
`of a? $9.35? 1’ elm 5931m- more than are
`
`do; race U ES'NRYEE Rita 3.0535 1.3
`Ymaiment 8: m U CiNR‘s‘ZE width #8300 t}
`
`twice misty {every 3 or 4 gears} tar E weeks.
`Mice $29163; {may 3 or 4 days} Zia 8mm:
`
`secemfmmfissm 3am: Mammkiaf'mfiz:mamgmhas.asm§em:fi£
`
`QC "ingedimperé'sse.AmeeersfiemCEFGstwmmwandfismmafi‘mmflm
`
`_
`
`5
`
`
`
`Tim-aim 3: 29533 U CSNRYEE mi‘h fiim 3.3
`.Yreasmani A; was} I.) SME’s‘EE
`24.§0§ Li
`
`_.
`
`twice may {every 3 or 4 stages}
`Minority {may 3 a? vi days}
`
`8'm
`Smacks.
`
`Fig. 4: Table describing patient dosing regimen of SC Study NCT01756157 which involved SC
`
`injection of Cinryze and rHuPH20.
`
`16.
`
`To enable subcutaneous delivery of such a large volume, we used Halozyme’s
`
`proprietary drug delivery platform technology based on recombinant human hyaluronidase
`
`' See the Background section of ViroPharma’s 2012 AAAAI poster (attached as Exhibit D).
`7
`
`Page 7 of 12
`
`Page 7 of 12
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`: Gallagher, er a1.
`In re
`
`
`
`Appl. No. : 14/855,168
`
`
`
`: September 15, 2015
`Filed
`
`
`
`
`: 8 of 12
`Page
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attomey’s Docket No.: SHR—1184US
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`enzyme (rHuPH20)2. Hyaluronidase is an enzyme which catalyzes the hydrolysis of hyaluronan,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a component of the human extracellular matrix. By degrading hyaluronan, hyaluronidase
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`increases tissue permeability. Hyaluronidase had been used to enhance absorption and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`dispersion of therapeutics and enable the subcutaneous administration of much larger volumes
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`than can normally be administered subcutaneously. See Haller, M. F., “Converting Intravenous
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dosing to Subcutaneous Dosing with Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase,” Pharm. Tech,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`published 02 October 2007, available at http://www.pharmtech.com/converting-intravenous-
`
`
`
`dosing-subcutaneous-dosing-recombinant-human-hyaluronidase.
`
`
`
`17.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`However, this study was terminated due to safety concerns over emergence of,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and unexpected incidence and titer of, non-neutralizing anti-rHuPH20 antibodies after
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`administration of CINRYZE® in combination with rHuPH20 in a Phase 2 clinical study in HAE
`
`
`
`subjects.
`
`
`
`18.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CSL Behring’s study was designed to investigate the subcutaneous versus
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`intravenous administration of Berinert P in patients with mild or moderate HAE to evaluate the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`possibility of an alternative administration mode in cases where IV access is not suitable. See,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Kreuz. According to published reports, CSL Behring’s study involved the SC administration of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a large volume of 50 U/mL Cl-INH formulation, Berinert. See Martinez-Saguer et al.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`TRANSFUSION, 54: 1552-1561 (2014) (providing more detail regarding the Kreuz study and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`subsequent findings) (Exhibit C). As described in Martinez-Saguer, 20 mL of 50 U/mL Cl-INH
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`were administered to the patients. In order to administer such a large volume, 10 mL of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`composition were administered in each of two different subcutaneous abdominal sites over 15
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`minutes using two medical infusion pumps for continuous, simultaneous administration. In my
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`experience, SC administration of such large volumes can be traumatic and labor intensive with
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`infusion pumps, particularly without the co-administration of a permeability enhancing agent
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`such as rHuPH20. In some cases, it may trigger an HAE attack. As far as I know, CSL
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2 ViroPharma entered into a multi-million dollar license agreement with Halozyme for the purpose of this study.
`8
`
`
`
`
`Page 8 of 12
`
`Page 8 of 12
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`: Gallagher, er a1.
`In re
`
`
`
`Appl. No. : 14/855,168
`
`
`
`: September 15, 2015
`Filed
`
`
`
`
`: 9 of 12
`Page
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attomey’s Docket No.: SHR—1184US
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Behring’s earlier clinical subcutaneous study using low concentration high volume formulation
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Berinert as described in Kreuz was not further developed.
`
`
`
`19.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I am also familiar with the animal study described in Jiang, which sought to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`assess whether reasonable levels of functional human Cl-INH could be achieved in swine
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`plasma following SC administration. In that study, again, a large volume of CINRYZE®(1OO
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`U/mL) was infused subcutaneously into pigs by continuous pump over a 60-minute period. See,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Jiang, p. 325, left column.
`
`
`
`
`20.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Prior to the successful development of high concentration formulations by the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`present inventors, the entire field had been focused on SC delivery of Cl-INH at a low
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`concentration (e. g., f 100 U/mL) in a large volume (e.g., 10-20 mL) due to the safety and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`efficacy concerns over increasing Cl-INH concentrations in formulations. In other words, the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`consensus in the field was that it was not an easy or obvious strategy to increase Cl-INH
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`concentration for SC injection purposes because of the various challenges described above.
`
`
`21.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Indeed, it took years and millions of dollars in investment for Shire and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ViroPharma scientists to eventually develop a clinically acceptable, high concentration SC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`formulation of Cl-INH that was safe and effective. Examples of such formulations were
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`described in the present application. One such high concentration SC formulation containing ~
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`500 U/mL Cl-INH is being tested in human clinical studies, which enables subcutaneous
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`delivery of 1000-2000 IU C1-INH in 2-4 mL.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`22. We have now successfully completed a Phase I human clinical study and found
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`that the high concentration SC formulation is surprisingly safe, well-tolerated, stable, and has
`
`
`
`
`
`unexpectedly good bioavailability.
`
`
`
`
`23.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Despite concerns about increased Cl-INH aggregation at high protein
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`concentrations, there was no immunogenicity concerns, specifically no development of anti-C1-
`
`9
`
`
`
`Page 9 of 12
`
`Page 9 of 12
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`: Gallagher, er a1.
`In re
`
`
`
`Appl. No. : 14/855,168
`
`
`
`: September 15, 2015
`Filed
`
`
`
`
`Page
`: 10 of 12
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attomey’s Docket No.: SHR—1184US
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`INH antibodies in the Phase I healthy volunteers who received 2 subcutaneous doses of the new
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`high concentration formulation. The injection was unexpectedly well tolerated, with little or no
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`pain reported by the subjects, when I observed the injections. More surprisingly, the SC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`injection of a high concentration formulation (e.g., 500 U/mL) achieved better bioavailability of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Cl-INH total antigen as compared to low concentration formulations. For example, SC injection
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of 1000 U of Cl-INH at a concentration of 100 U/mL has achieved about 70% relative
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`bioavailability as compared to IV administration of Cl-INH at a concentration of 100 U/mL. By
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`contrast, the results reported by Martinez-Saguer showed that SC injection of Cl-INH at a low
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`concentration of 50 U/mL had about 40% bioavailability. See Martinez-Saguer at p. 1556. This
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`was unexpected because the increased viscosity of the high concentration formulation appeared
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`to have no negative impact on absorption and tissue distribution of Cl-INH.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`24. We have now obtained FDA permission to advance to a phase III clinical trial
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`based on our successful Phase I study. Based on the totality of data, bioavailability data from
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`our phase I studies and prior human efficacy studies in HAE prevention, we have simulated a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`twice-weekly efficacious dose regimen. See Figure 5 below. As shown below, injection of 1000
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`U or more Cl-INH at a high concentration (e. g., ~500 U/mL) twice a week would result in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`maintaining functional Cl-INH blood levels above a threshold level (~04 U/mL or 40% of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`functional C1 INH activity) to achieve therapeutic effects (see the red line in Figure 5 below).
`
`
`
`10
`
`
`
`Page 10 of 12
`
`Page 10 of 12
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`: Gallagher, er al.
`In re
`
`
`
`Appl. No.: 14/855,168
`
`
`
`: September 15, 2015
`Filed
`
`
`
`
`Page
`: 11 of 12
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attomey’s Docket No.: SHR—l 184US
`
`
`
`1:9
`
`C:'1-<1HH{U}i":L)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Fig. 5: Predicted concentration of functional Cl-INH in adult HAE patients receiving twice
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`weekly subcutaneous injection of 500 U/mL Cl-INH formulation.
`
`
`25.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Many have predicted that the successful development of this high concentration
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`small volume Cl-INH formulation would be a game-changer for HAE patients because this will
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`not only allow for a safer and potentially more effective treatment of HAE, but also permit self-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`administration and give patients more control over their disease through routine prevention.
`
`
`
`11
`
`
`
`Page 11 of 12
`
`Page 11 of 12
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a.
`
`
`2853.
`
`
`
`13:: $531: r; 22;?
`1“a
`l
`_ :1: 3m ‘pimiu x‘?
`
`PC;
`
`V
`
`3,
`
`“(x\
`w kmwi
`
`z)
`
`A,\\
`
`$0ua;
`fix
`
`":{i
`
`\.x
`
`Hi
`
`q1
`
`.
`if}?!
`
`a.A».
`‘t
`aka {a}? §,-::1§2“‘>_:‘:3m
`
`n
`“3..
`{3
`3 m
`Iii, {:Ei’
`
`‘i
`
`‘
`
`c‘
`G
`
`1
`{Iii
`
`,. isms -
`
`Page 12 of 12
`
`Page 12 of 12
`
`