throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`
`Confirmation No: 1675
`Filed: September 15, 2015
`For: C1-INH CONEPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR THE PREVENTION AND
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`TREATIVLENT OF DISORDERS ASSOCIATED WITH C1 ESIERASE INHIBITOR
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DEFICIENCY
`
`
`spent over 20 years conducting clinical research and trials involving treatments for various
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In re application of: GALLAGHER, Cynthia, et a]. Examiner: MIKNIS, Zachary I.
`
`
`
`Application No: 14/855,168
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Group Art Unit: 8760
`
`
`
`
`
`VIA EFS WEB FILING — WWW.USPTO.GOV
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Commissioner for Patents
`
`
`PO. Box 1450
`
`
`
`
`
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF DR. JENNIFER SCHRANZ UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 1.132
`
`
`
`Dear Commissioner:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1, Jennifer Schranz, hereby declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 am currently a Vice President of Clinical Development and the Global
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Development Team Lead for Angioedema at Shire, the assignee of the above-identified patent
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`application US l4/855, 168 (the “present application”) as a result of Shire’s acquisition of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ViroPharma, the original assignee of the application. Before Shire acquired ViroPharma, I
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`served as ViroPharma’s Vice President of Clinical Research. Since March 2011, I have overseen
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the development of CINRYZE®, including the ongoing effort for developing subcutaneous
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`formulation of C1 esterase inhibitor (Cl—INH), the active ingredient in CINRYZE®.
`
`
`2.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I hold a doctorate of medicine degree from the University of Toronto and have
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Docket No: SHR—l 184US
`
`
`
`
`
`(PATENT)
`
`CSL EXHIBIT 1002
`CSL v. Shire
`
`Page 1 of 12
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`: Gallagher, er al.
`In re
`
`
`
`Appl. No. : 14/855,168
`
`
`
`: September 15, 2015
`Filed
`
`
`
`
`: 2 of 12
`Page
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attomey’s Docket No.: SHR—1184US
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`diseases including hereditary angioedema (HAE). Before joining ViroPharma, I held various
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`positions at other biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, including Merck & Co., Inc,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`GlaxoSmithKline, Vicuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Pfizer Inc, and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Cempra, Inc, where I was involved in early and late stage clinical development (pre-clinical and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`clinical) for various diseases. My experience and education, including publications in which I
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`am an author are summarized in my curriculum vitae, a true and accurate copy of which is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`provided with this declaration as Exhibit A.
`
`
`3.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In preparation of this declaration, I have read and understand the specification and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`pending claims of the present application and the following documents:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`0 ViroPharma Phase 2b Combination Study for Subcutaneous Administration of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Cinryze® With Hyaluronidase (rHuPH20), press release published 19 December
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2012 (“ViroPharma Press Release”);
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`0 Kreuz, W., ClinicalTrialsgov NCTOO748202, published 4 September 2008: SC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`vs IV comparison study of Berinert P (“Kreuz”); and
`
`
`
`
`o
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Jiang et al., Clinical Immunology 136:323-328, published 8 June 2010 (“Jiang”).
`
`
`
`
`4.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I have been asked to comment on, among other things, the development of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`subcutaneous formulation for the treatment of hereditary angioedema (HAE).
`
`
`
`
`5.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HAE is a rare and potentially life-threatening genetic disorder characterized by
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`recurrent acute attacks of non-whealing, non-pruritic edema affecting the cutaneous tissues or
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`mucous membranes. See, A. Agostoni er al, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2004; 114(3): S51-131,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`attached as Exhibit B. HAE symptoms include episodes of edema (swelling) in various body
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`parts including the hands, feet, face, abdomen, genitalia, and airway. See Figures 1 and 2 below.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Airway swelling is particularly dangerous and can lead to death by asphyxiation. In addition,
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 2 of 12
`
`Page 2 of 12
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`: Gallagher, er a1.
`In re
`
`
`
`Appl. No. : 14/855,168
`
`
`
`: September 15, 2015
`Filed
`
`
`
`
`: 3 of 12
`Page
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attomey’s Docket No.: SHR—1184US
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`patients often have bouts of excruciating abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting that are caused
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`by swelling in the intestinal wall.
`
`
`
`
`6.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Thus, HAE is a debilitating disease that dramatically affects patients’ lives. The
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`uncertainty of attack onset combined with the severity of the symptoms results in many patients
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`suffering from anxiety and depression. Many patients also avoid normal daily activities, as well
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`as necessary medical and dental procedures out of fear of triggering an attack. Accordingly,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`prevention of attacks is critical for both the mental and physical health of affected individuals,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`often referred to as humanistic burden, and is an important part of treatment of HAE. As this is a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`hereditary disorder, transfer of the genetic defect to children also brings significant burden to the
`
`
`
`parents.
`
`
`
`
`7.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HAE patients have a defect in the gene that encodes Cl-INH, which results in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`inadequate or non-functioning Cl-INH. In the majority of cases, this defect is transmitted in an
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`autosomal dominant fashion; however in 25% of cases a spontaneous mutation occurs. Absent
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the defect, Cl-INH functions as a constituent of human blood that regulates the complex
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`biochemical interactions of blood-based systems involved in disease fighting, inflammatory
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`response and coagulation. Because inadequate or defective Cl-INH does not adequately perform
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`this regulatory function, a biochemical imbalance can occur and produce unwanted peptides such
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`as bradykinin that induce the capillaries to release fluids into surrounding tissue, thereby causing
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`edema. Triggering events include stress, hormonal fluctuations (e. g. estrogen), toxins, injury,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`inflammation, ischemia, viral infections, among others.
`
`
`
`
`8.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The photos below show the debilitating effects of HAE attacks on patients who
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`suffer from the disorder, specifically upper airway or laryngeal edema:
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 3 of 12
`
`Page 3 of 12
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`: Gallagher, er a1.
`In re
`
`
`
`Appl. No. : 14/855,168
`
`
`
`Filed
`: September 15, 2015
`
`
`
`
`: 4 of 12
`Page
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attomey’s Docket No.: SHR—1184US
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Fig. 1: Female patient suffering from edema and requiring nasal intubation. See, K. Bork er al.
`
`
`Am JMed 2006;119: 267-274.
`
`
`
`\Ԥ
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Fig. 2: Progression of attack symptoms in male patient. See, Banerji A, Ann Allergy Asthma
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Immunol 111 (2013) 329-336, Figure 2.
`
`
`9.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`At present, the treatment options for HAE prophylaxis are limited. CINRYZE®
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(C1 esterase inhibitor [Human]) is the only Cl-INH replacement product approved for HAE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`prophylaxis. CINRYZE® is human plasma derived Cl-INH, indicated for routine prophylaxis
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`against angioedema attacks in adolescent and adult patients. CINRYZE® is provided as 500 U of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`lyophilisate per vial. Each vial is reconstituted in 5 mL of sterile water, to a concentration of 100
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`U/mL prior to administration. Two vials, or a total of 10 mL, are administered by intravenous
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`infusion every 3-4 days in order to achieve an appropriate threshold of functional Cl-INH
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`activity for routine prophylaxis against angioedema attacks in adolescent and adult patients.
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 4 of 12
`
`Page 4 of 12
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`: Gallagher, er a1.
`In re
`
`
`
`Appl. No. : 14/855,168
`
`
`
`: September 15, 2015
`Filed
`
`
`
`
`: 5 of 12
`Page
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attomey’s Docket No.: SHR—1184US
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10. While the current IV formulation of CINRYZE® provides an important and life-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`saving treatment for HAE, a subcutaneous (SC) formulation of Cl-INH could represent a more
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`convenient and patient friendly option for many HAE patients and healthcare providers. For
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`example, SC formulation allows for self-administration by patients, especially those who do not
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`want to, or cannot, access an intravenous site. SC administration has the important advantage of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`not requiring access to veins twice weekly or in some patients, maintaining a central venous
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`access port, when peripheral IV access is no longer possible. It also avoids significant
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`complications of central IV access, such as thromboembolism due to a foreign body, infections,
`
`
`
`61C.
`
`
`11.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`However, typically it is difficult or impossible to formulate protein drugs like
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CINRYZE® for SC administration. A successful SC formulation requires sufficiently high
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`protein concentration so that therapeutically effective dosages may be delivered in a small
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`volume into human patients safely. In other words, a successful SC formulation requires high
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`concentration, small volume, and acceptable viscosity and syringeability. Achieving this
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`combination of features has proven very difficult, particularly when dealing with large proteins,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`due to physical and chemical instability at high protein concentrations. For example, physical
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`instability causes protein aggregation. Aggregated protein increases risk of immunogenicity and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`may result in loss of potency. Chemical instability results in oxidation of the protein, particulate
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`formation, or product precipitation, which affects product homogeneity, safety, and efficacy.
`
`
`
`12.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The key to developing a formulation suitable for SC administration of Cl-INH is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`to increase Cl-INH concentration in order to permit the administration of therapeutically
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`effective dosage (e.g., > 1000 IU) in as small a volume as feasible, typically, no more than 2-4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`mL per injection site. In addition to the common challenges for SC formulation described above,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Cl-INH has certain characteristics that posed unique challenges in a high concentration SC
`
`
`formulation.
`
`Page 5 of 12
`
`
`
`Page 5 of 12
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`: Gallagher, er a1.
`In re
`
`
`
`Appl. No. : 14/855,168
`
`
`
`: September 15, 2015
`Filed
`
`
`
`
`Page
`: 6 of 12
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attomey’s Docket No.: SHR—1184US
`
`
`
`13.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Cl-INH is a large protein, the largest member of serpin superfamily. Human C1-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`INH is made up of 478 amino acids plus a 22-amino acid signal peptide. It has an apparent
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`molecular weight of about ~105 KDa. Cl-INH is highly glycosylated. In fact, Cl-INH is one of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the most highly glycosylated plasma proteins. More than 26% of the molecular weight of C1-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`INH is carbohydrate. Cl-INH bears both N— and O-linked glycans. See Figure 3 below. Like
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`many highly glycosylated proteins, Cl-INH has high viscosity. Moreover, plasma-derived C1-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`INH is particularly prone to aggregation due to the presence of certain co-eluates.
`
`
`
`
`9351155 {Length’fiflfié
`
`
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
` .
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`....
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Fig. 3: Structural schematic of Cl-INH. N—linked glycans are represented at N, O-linked
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`glycans are represented at T or S.
`
`
`
`14.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Thus, it was highly uncertain whether Cl-INH could be formulated at a high
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`concentration for SC injection. Indeed, for a long period of time prior to the present invention,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the consensus in the field was that it might not be feasible to develop high concentration with a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`small volume SC formulation for Cl-INH. Leaders in the Cl-INH therapeutic field, ViroPharma
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(the manufacture of CINRYZE®) and CSL Behring (the manufacturer of Berinert indicated for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`acute HAE attack at 50 U/mL) appreciated the long-felt need by HAE patients for a more
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`convenient non-parenteral delivery of Cl-INH, ability for self-administration and thereby better
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`Page 6 of 12
`
`Page 6 of 12
`
`

`

`: Gallagher, er a1.
`In re
`Appl. No.: 14/855,168
`Filed
`: September 15, 2015
`Page
`: 7 of 12
`
`Attomey’s Docket No.: SHR-1184US
`
`control of their disease.1 Each of ViroPharma and CSL Behring initiated human clinical studies
`
`of SC administration of C l-INH using low concentration formulations that had been developed
`
`for IV injection. As explained below, those earlier human clinical trials were either
`
`unsuccessful or did not continue to Phase 3.
`
`15.
`
`As Vice President of Clinical Research of ViroPharma, I was responsible for
`
`ViroPharrna’s earlier human clinical studies of SC administration of CINRYZE® described in the
`
`ViroPharma Press Release. In that study, subjects were subcutaneously infused with 20 mL of
`
`liquid containing either 1000 U of Cinryze with 24,000 U of rHuPH20 or 2000 U of Cinryze
`
`with 48,000 U recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20), a dispersing agent. Accordingly,
`
`the final concentration of C 1-INH administered was 50 U/mL or 100 U/mL, respectively. See
`
`ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01756157 which describes the same study in further detail:
`
`
`
`
`23
`5; mefis seemed fiea‘imea'ta in Fem: ‘3 am. Tania-381' E as Ferrari 2. {or 8 wears each as a
`ions} WWW éS‘G}
`per «we- .5: wasms
`of a? $9.35? 1’ elm 5931m- more than are
`
`do; race U ES'NRYEE Rita 3.0535 1.3
`Ymaiment 8: m U CiNR‘s‘ZE width #8300 t}
`
`twice misty {every 3 or 4 gears} tar E weeks.
`Mice $29163; {may 3 or 4 days} Zia 8mm:
`
`secemfmmfissm 3am: Mammkiaf'mfiz:mamgmhas.asm§em:fi£
`
`QC "ingedimperé'sse.AmeeersfiemCEFGstwmmwandfismmafi‘mmflm
`
`_
`
`5
`
`
`
`Tim-aim 3: 29533 U CSNRYEE mi‘h fiim 3.3
`.Yreasmani A; was} I.) SME’s‘EE
`24.§0§ Li
`
`_.
`
`twice may {every 3 or 4 stages}
`Minority {may 3 a? vi days}
`
`8'm
`Smacks.
`
`Fig. 4: Table describing patient dosing regimen of SC Study NCT01756157 which involved SC
`
`injection of Cinryze and rHuPH20.
`
`16.
`
`To enable subcutaneous delivery of such a large volume, we used Halozyme’s
`
`proprietary drug delivery platform technology based on recombinant human hyaluronidase
`
`' See the Background section of ViroPharma’s 2012 AAAAI poster (attached as Exhibit D).
`7
`
`Page 7 of 12
`
`Page 7 of 12
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`: Gallagher, er a1.
`In re
`
`
`
`Appl. No. : 14/855,168
`
`
`
`: September 15, 2015
`Filed
`
`
`
`
`: 8 of 12
`Page
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attomey’s Docket No.: SHR—1184US
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`enzyme (rHuPH20)2. Hyaluronidase is an enzyme which catalyzes the hydrolysis of hyaluronan,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a component of the human extracellular matrix. By degrading hyaluronan, hyaluronidase
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`increases tissue permeability. Hyaluronidase had been used to enhance absorption and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`dispersion of therapeutics and enable the subcutaneous administration of much larger volumes
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`than can normally be administered subcutaneously. See Haller, M. F., “Converting Intravenous
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dosing to Subcutaneous Dosing with Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase,” Pharm. Tech,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`published 02 October 2007, available at http://www.pharmtech.com/converting-intravenous-
`
`
`
`dosing-subcutaneous-dosing-recombinant-human-hyaluronidase.
`
`
`
`17.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`However, this study was terminated due to safety concerns over emergence of,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and unexpected incidence and titer of, non-neutralizing anti-rHuPH20 antibodies after
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`administration of CINRYZE® in combination with rHuPH20 in a Phase 2 clinical study in HAE
`
`
`
`subjects.
`
`
`
`18.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CSL Behring’s study was designed to investigate the subcutaneous versus
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`intravenous administration of Berinert P in patients with mild or moderate HAE to evaluate the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`possibility of an alternative administration mode in cases where IV access is not suitable. See,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Kreuz. According to published reports, CSL Behring’s study involved the SC administration of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a large volume of 50 U/mL Cl-INH formulation, Berinert. See Martinez-Saguer et al.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`TRANSFUSION, 54: 1552-1561 (2014) (providing more detail regarding the Kreuz study and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`subsequent findings) (Exhibit C). As described in Martinez-Saguer, 20 mL of 50 U/mL Cl-INH
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`were administered to the patients. In order to administer such a large volume, 10 mL of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`composition were administered in each of two different subcutaneous abdominal sites over 15
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`minutes using two medical infusion pumps for continuous, simultaneous administration. In my
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`experience, SC administration of such large volumes can be traumatic and labor intensive with
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`infusion pumps, particularly without the co-administration of a permeability enhancing agent
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`such as rHuPH20. In some cases, it may trigger an HAE attack. As far as I know, CSL
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2 ViroPharma entered into a multi-million dollar license agreement with Halozyme for the purpose of this study.
`8
`
`
`
`
`Page 8 of 12
`
`Page 8 of 12
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`: Gallagher, er a1.
`In re
`
`
`
`Appl. No. : 14/855,168
`
`
`
`: September 15, 2015
`Filed
`
`
`
`
`: 9 of 12
`Page
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attomey’s Docket No.: SHR—1184US
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Behring’s earlier clinical subcutaneous study using low concentration high volume formulation
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Berinert as described in Kreuz was not further developed.
`
`
`
`19.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I am also familiar with the animal study described in Jiang, which sought to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`assess whether reasonable levels of functional human Cl-INH could be achieved in swine
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`plasma following SC administration. In that study, again, a large volume of CINRYZE®(1OO
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`U/mL) was infused subcutaneously into pigs by continuous pump over a 60-minute period. See,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Jiang, p. 325, left column.
`
`
`
`
`20.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Prior to the successful development of high concentration formulations by the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`present inventors, the entire field had been focused on SC delivery of Cl-INH at a low
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`concentration (e. g., f 100 U/mL) in a large volume (e.g., 10-20 mL) due to the safety and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`efficacy concerns over increasing Cl-INH concentrations in formulations. In other words, the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`consensus in the field was that it was not an easy or obvious strategy to increase Cl-INH
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`concentration for SC injection purposes because of the various challenges described above.
`
`
`21.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Indeed, it took years and millions of dollars in investment for Shire and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ViroPharma scientists to eventually develop a clinically acceptable, high concentration SC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`formulation of Cl-INH that was safe and effective. Examples of such formulations were
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`described in the present application. One such high concentration SC formulation containing ~
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`500 U/mL Cl-INH is being tested in human clinical studies, which enables subcutaneous
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`delivery of 1000-2000 IU C1-INH in 2-4 mL.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`22. We have now successfully completed a Phase I human clinical study and found
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`that the high concentration SC formulation is surprisingly safe, well-tolerated, stable, and has
`
`
`
`
`
`unexpectedly good bioavailability.
`
`
`
`
`23.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Despite concerns about increased Cl-INH aggregation at high protein
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`concentrations, there was no immunogenicity concerns, specifically no development of anti-C1-
`
`9
`
`
`
`Page 9 of 12
`
`Page 9 of 12
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`: Gallagher, er a1.
`In re
`
`
`
`Appl. No. : 14/855,168
`
`
`
`: September 15, 2015
`Filed
`
`
`
`
`Page
`: 10 of 12
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attomey’s Docket No.: SHR—1184US
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`INH antibodies in the Phase I healthy volunteers who received 2 subcutaneous doses of the new
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`high concentration formulation. The injection was unexpectedly well tolerated, with little or no
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`pain reported by the subjects, when I observed the injections. More surprisingly, the SC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`injection of a high concentration formulation (e.g., 500 U/mL) achieved better bioavailability of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Cl-INH total antigen as compared to low concentration formulations. For example, SC injection
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of 1000 U of Cl-INH at a concentration of 100 U/mL has achieved about 70% relative
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`bioavailability as compared to IV administration of Cl-INH at a concentration of 100 U/mL. By
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`contrast, the results reported by Martinez-Saguer showed that SC injection of Cl-INH at a low
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`concentration of 50 U/mL had about 40% bioavailability. See Martinez-Saguer at p. 1556. This
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`was unexpected because the increased viscosity of the high concentration formulation appeared
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`to have no negative impact on absorption and tissue distribution of Cl-INH.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`24. We have now obtained FDA permission to advance to a phase III clinical trial
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`based on our successful Phase I study. Based on the totality of data, bioavailability data from
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`our phase I studies and prior human efficacy studies in HAE prevention, we have simulated a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`twice-weekly efficacious dose regimen. See Figure 5 below. As shown below, injection of 1000
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`U or more Cl-INH at a high concentration (e. g., ~500 U/mL) twice a week would result in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`maintaining functional Cl-INH blood levels above a threshold level (~04 U/mL or 40% of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`functional C1 INH activity) to achieve therapeutic effects (see the red line in Figure 5 below).
`
`
`
`10
`
`
`
`Page 10 of 12
`
`Page 10 of 12
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`: Gallagher, er al.
`In re
`
`
`
`Appl. No.: 14/855,168
`
`
`
`: September 15, 2015
`Filed
`
`
`
`
`Page
`: 11 of 12
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attomey’s Docket No.: SHR—l 184US
`
`
`
`1:9
`
`C:'1-<1HH{U}i":L)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Fig. 5: Predicted concentration of functional Cl-INH in adult HAE patients receiving twice
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`weekly subcutaneous injection of 500 U/mL Cl-INH formulation.
`
`
`25.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Many have predicted that the successful development of this high concentration
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`small volume Cl-INH formulation would be a game-changer for HAE patients because this will
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`not only allow for a safer and potentially more effective treatment of HAE, but also permit self-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`administration and give patients more control over their disease through routine prevention.
`
`
`
`11
`
`
`
`Page 11 of 12
`
`Page 11 of 12
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a.
`
`
`2853.
`
`
`
`13:: $531: r; 22;?
`1“a
`l
`_ :1: 3m ‘pimiu x‘?
`
`PC;
`
`V
`
`3,
`
`“(x\
`w kmwi
`
`z)
`
`A,\\
`
`$0ua;
`fix
`
`":{i
`
`\.x
`
`Hi
`
`q1
`
`.
`if}?!
`
`a.A».
`‘t
`aka {a}? §,-::1§2“‘>_:‘:3m
`
`n
`“3..
`{3
`3 m
`Iii, {:Ei’
`
`‘i
`
`‘
`
`c‘
`G
`
`1
`{Iii
`
`,. isms -
`
`Page 12 of 12
`
`Page 12 of 12
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket