throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`Paper 23
`Entered: July 26, 2018
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`_____________
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`HTC CORPORATION, HTC AMERICA, Inc.
`ZTE CORPORATION, and ZTE (USA), Inc.,
`Petitioners
`v.
`
`CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`___________
`
`Case IPR2017-01508 (Patent 8,385,966 B2)
`Case IPR2017-01509 (Patent 9,037,129 B2)1
`____________
`
`
`
`Before BRYAN F. MOORE, JENNIFER S. BISK, and
`GREGG I. ANDERSON, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`ANDERSON, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`DECISION
`Joint Motion to Terminate with Respect to HTC Corporation and HTC
`America, Inc.
`37 C.F.R. § 42.72
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 The parties are not authorized to use this caption. The parties should use
`the caption appropriate to the specific case.
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01508 (Patent 8,385,966)
`IPR2017-01509 (Patent 9,037,129)
`
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`On November 26, 2017, we instituted an inter partes review in both
`
`IPR2017-01508 and IPR2017-01509 (“’1508 IPR” and “’1509 IPR,”
`
`respectively), both captioned HTC Corporation, HTC America, Inc.
`
`(“HTC”), ZTE Corporation, and ZTE (USA), Inc. (“ZTE”) (collectively,
`
`“Petitioners”) versus Cellular Communications Equipment LLC (“Patent
`
`Owner”). In both proceedings, a final hearing was held on July 10, 2018.
`
`The Board has not issued a final written decision. Per our email dated July
`
`18, 2018, we authorized the filing of a motion to terminate and to treat the
`
`settlement documents as confidential as to HTC. See Ex. 3001. Per our
`
`authorization, on July 20, 2018, Petitioners and Patent Owner filed a Joint
`
`Motion to Terminate Petitioners Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317 and 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 42.74 as to HTC only (“Joint Motion”). ’1508 IPR, Paper 19; ’1509 IPR,
`
`Paper 20. Concurrent with the filing of the Joint Motion, a true copy of
`
`Release Agreement and a Patent License and License Option Agreement
`
`(’1508 IPR, Exs. 2014 and 2015; ’1509 IPR, Exs. 2005 and 2006) were
`
`filed. Also concurrent with the filing of the Joint Motion, a Joint Request to
`
`Treat Agreement as Business Confidential Information Under 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c) was filed. ’1508 IPR, Paper 20; ’1509
`
`IPR, Paper 21.
`
`Under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a), “[a]n inter partes review instituted under
`
`this chapter shall be terminated with respect to any petitioner upon the joint
`
`request of the petitioner and patent owner, unless the Office has decided the
`
`merits of the proceeding before the request for termination is filed.” The
`
`grant of the motion to terminate will not result in the termination of the
`
`instant proceeding, because ZTE remains a Petitioners. The parties are
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01508 (Patent 8,385,966)
`IPR2017-01509 (Patent 9,037,129)
`
`reminded that the Board is not a party to the settlements, and may identify
`
`independently any question of patentability. 37 C.F.R § 42.74(a).
`
`Generally, however, the Board expects that a proceeding will
`
`terminate as to settling parties after the filing of a settlement agreement.
`
`See, e.g., Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48,756, 48,768
`
`(Aug. 14, 2012). The Board is persuaded that, under these circumstances, it
`
`is appropriate to terminate this proceeding only as to HTC. See 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 42.72.
`
`Accordingly, it is:
`
`ORDER
`
`ORDERED that the joint motion to terminate this proceeding with
`
`respect to HTC is GRANTED, and this proceeding is hereby terminated only
`
`as to HTC; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ Joint Request to Treat
`
`Agreement as Business Confidential Information Under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b)
`
`and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c) relating to ’1508 IPR Exhibits 2014 and 2015 and
`
`’1509 IPR Exhibits 2005 and 2006, is GRANTED, and the specified exhibits
`
`shall be: (i) treated as business confidential information; (ii) kept separate
`
`from the files of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,385,966 and 9,037,129; (iii) kept
`
`confidential from any third party (including from the non-settling Petitioner
`
`ZTE); (iv) filed as “BOARD ONLY,” and (v) made available only to
`
`Federal Government agencies on written request, or to any person on a
`
`showing of good cause, under the provisions of 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37
`
`C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01508 (Patent 8,385,966)
`IPR2017-01509 (Patent 9,037,129)
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Steve Moore
`steve.moore@pillsburylaw.com
`
`Brian Nash
`brian.nash@pillsburylaw.com
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Matthew Juren
`matthew@nelbum.com
`
`Barry Bumgardner
`barry@nelbum.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket