throbber
),
`
`·. · U1 715272 · .
`JPRESS MAIL LABEL NO. 859937585
`DATE MAILED: June 14, 1991
`GENENTECH, INC.
`
`
`
`460 Point San Bruno Boulevard, South San Francisco, CA 94080
`(415) 266-1000
`
`Docket No. 709
`
`
`
`NEW APPLICATION TRANSMITTAL
`
`r·
`
`SIR:
`
`
`
`
`
`Transmitted herewith for filing is the patent application of lnvantor(sl:
`PAUL J. CARTER ET AL.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Title: IMMUNOGLOBULIN VARIANTS
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATION UNDER 37 CFR §1.10
`
`I hereby certify that this New Application and the docunents referred to es enclosed herein ere being deposited with the United
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mell Ing Lebel Mell Post Office To Addressee" States Postal Service on this date June 14, 1991, In en envelope bearing "Express
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Nurt>er 859937585 addressed to: Patent Application, Honorable Comnlssloner of etents nd T ad ks, ashlngton, D.C. 20231.
`
`Carolyn R, Adler
`
`(Name of person malling paper)
`
`Enclosed are:
`
`1.· The papers required for filing date under CFR § 1.53(b):
`
`
`
`
`
`.1filL Pages of specification (Including claims); _L Sheets of drawings Lformal / .lL informal)
`
`.2L Declaration/Oath/Power of Attorney
`
`
`_ Assignment of the invention to GENENTECH, INC.
`4. Fee Calculation
`
`3.
`
`CLAIMS AS FILED
`
`Rate
`
`X $20.00
`
`I-
`
`*
`
`Total Claims
`
`16 -20"
`
`. \ndep. Claims
`
`8 -3 ..
`
`I Basic Fee
`I
`x S60.00
`·s200.ooI
`
`$630
`
`630.
`
`300.
`
`tNll!ber F !led INuroer Extra
`-
`I
`* 5
`depe ndent c:lalm.<s>, If any
`Hllltlple
`011•
`11
`Recordlng Assignment [$8.001 Total Fees Enclosed
`
`
`*If less than zero, enter
`8. Payment of Fees
`
`SU tbi§ tran.s,mjttl,ll l§ attached.
`..lL Charge Account No. 07-0630 In the amount of $_. A mtQllcate
`
`Fees 9. -2L Authorization to Charge Additional
`
`
`
`
`
`The Commissioner is hereby authorized to charge any additional fees (or credit any overpayment) associated
`
`
`
`
`with this communication and which may be required under 37 CFR § 1.16 or § 1. 17 to Account No. 07-0630.
`8 sfypljcate sheet is
`attached.
`
`
`1'0. Information Disclosure Statement
`
`11. .2L . Return Receipt Postcard
`
`7.
`
`$
`
`
`
`. . . . . . $930.00
`
`14, 1991
`Dated _June
`
`�,�/(,�
`Name: CarotvnRAd1er
`
`Registration No. 32,324
`
`. .
`
`·Pfizer v. Genentech
`IPR20I 7-01489
`
`
`
`I
`
`
`
`
`
`Genentech Exhibit 2032
`
`

`

`o 2
`rroune ia: v, owsrn
`=
`
`s7522°70
`
`10
`
`pred]
`
`4D5
`
`HU4D5
`
`HUV,«I
`
`p1v#ngsitsSVCDRVSICKASQDVNTAVAWYQQKPCHSPKLLTYSASPRUT
`prgltnasrS$hsaSveoRvritcRASQDVNTAVANYGQKPGRAPKLLTYSASFLES
`p0M7QSPSSLSASVGDRVIITCRASQDVSSYLAWYQQKPGKAPKLLTYAASSLES
`V,_-CDR1.
`V,-CDR2
`
`,
`
`30
`
`40
`
`50
`
`an the ten fente Sen cee me se RAENGem in Sh
`
`oe a ee oe oe me
`
`4D5
`
`HU4D5
`
`HUV,K Ir
`
`60
`70
`80. 90
`100
`GVPDRFTGNRSGTDFTFTISSVQAEDLAVYYCOQHYTTPPTFGGGTHLETERA
`evebarbchascrprniarsstorEpraryveqgiymnrprecacnkvErKt
`GvPSRFSGSSGPDPTLTSSLQPEDFATYYCOQYNSLPYTFGQGTAVETKR?
`
`ea ete ce ne a ere Ue HN sea
`
`
`
`-—y
`
`

`

`oe.
`FIGURE 1B: Vy DOMAIN
`
`e
`
`|
`
`I 715272
`
`4D5
`
`HU4D5
`
`HUV,III
`
`A
`50
`40
`30
`-20 |
`10 -
`EVQLQQSGPELVKPGASLKLSCTASGENIKDTYIHWVKQRPEQGLEWIGRIYPTN
`|
`|
`\
`EVOLVESGGGLVOPGGSLRLSCAASGFNIKDTYIHWVROAPGKGLEWVARIYPTN
`poyiid
`|
`Vil pyre
`EVQLVESGGGLVQPGGSLRLSCAASGFTFSDYAMSWVRQAPGKGLEWVAVI SENG
`chen matnaheuteniemioende dea!
`ee ae ae ee oe oe ee
`— a ee oe
`
`Vy~CDR2
`
`60
`70
`80
`ABC
`90
`1OOABC
`GYTRYDPKFQDKATITADTSSNTAYLQVSRLTSEDTAVYYCSRWGGDGFYAMDYW
`pireyeel
`GYTRYADSVKGRFTISADTSKNTAYLONNSLRAEDTAVY¥CSRNGGDGFYAMDVW
`SDT'YYADSVKGRFTISRDDSKNTLYLOWNSLRAEDIAVYYCARDRGGAVSYFDVH
`
`penis
`
`:
`
`om cone ones sen as ee same
`
`4D5
`
`. HU4D5
`
`HUV,III
`
`ee
`
`4D5
`
`HU4D5
`
`110
`
`p GQGASVTVSS
`. GOGTLVTVSS
`
`HUV,III
`
`GOQOGTLVTVSS
`
`
`
`

`

`Figure 2
`Anneal huV,_ or huV, oligomers to pAKI template
`
`715272
`
`
`
`1. Ligate
`2. Isolate assembled oligomers
`3. Anneal to pAK1 template (Xhol-, Stul*)
`4. Extend and ligate
`
`| Xhol ~
`
`
`
`1. Transform E.coli
`2. Isolate phagemid pool
`3. Enrich for huV, and huVy(Xho II+, Stul-)
`4. Sequence verify
`
`\
`
`,
`
`

`

`muMAb4D5
`
`715272
`
`416
`
`~ buMAD4D5-8
`
`4 8 12
`[MAb4D5variant] pg/ml
`
`pl
`
`Percentofcontrolcell
`proliferation
`
`
`
`

`

`Wl 718272
`
`
`
`

`

` eo
`
`pense
`
`DOCKET 709 |
`.
`EXPRESS MAIL NO. B59937585
`
`MAILED 14 JUNE 1991
`
`4
`
`A6/
`
`IMMUNOGLOBULIN VARIANTS
`
`Field of the Invention
`
`This invention relates to methods for the preparation and useof
`variant antibodies and finds application particularly in the fields of
`
`Immunology and cancer diagnosis and therapy.
`
`Backoround of the Invention
`
`Naturally occurring antibodies (immunoglobulins) comprise two
`heavy chains linked together by disulfide bonds and twolight chains, one
`light chain being linked to each of the heavy chainsby disulfide bonds. Each
`heavy chain has at one end a variable domain (V,) followed by a numberof
`constant domains. Each light chain has a variable domain (V,) at one end
`and a constant domainat its other end; the constant domain of the light
`chain is aligned withthe first constant domain of the heavy chain, and the
`
`light chain variable domain is aligned with the variable domain of the heavy
`chain. Particular amino acid residues are believed to forman interface
`betweenthe light and heavy chain variable domains, see e.g. Chothia etal.,
`J. Mol. Biol. 186:651-663 (1985); Novotny and Haber, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`30
`
`
`
`

`

` ©@
`
`e
`USA 82:4592-4596 (1985).
`involved directly in binding the
`The constant domains are not
`antibody to an antigen, but are involved in various effector functions, such
`as participation of the antibody in antibody-dependentcellular cytotoxicity.
`The variable domains of each pairof light and heavy chains are involved
`directly in binding the antibody to the antigen. The domains of natural light
`and heavy chains have the same genera! structure, and each domain
`
`comprises four framework (FR) regions, whose sequences are somewhat
`conserved,
`connected
`by three hyper-variable
`or
`complementarity
`determining regions (CDRs) (see Kabat, E. A. et af., Sequences of Proteins
`of Immunological Interest, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD,
`(1987)). The four framework regions largely adopt a B-sheet conformation
`and the CDRs form loops connecting, and in somecasesforming part of, the
`B-sheet structure. The CDRs in each chain are held in close proximity by the .
`framework regions and, with the CDRs from the other chain, contribute to
`the formation of the antigen binding site.
`Widespread use has been made of monoclonal antibodies,
`particularly those derived from rodents including mice, however they are
`frequently antigenic in human clinical use. For example, a major limitation in
`the clinical use of rodent monoclonal antibodies is an anti-globulin response
`during therapy (Miller, R. A. et a/., Blood 62:988-995 (1983); Schroff, R. W.
`et al., Cancer Res. 45:879-885 (1985)).
`
`|
`
`The art has attempted to overcome this problem by constructing
`
`“chimeric” antibodies in which an animal antigen-binding variable domain is
`coupled to a human constant domain (Cabilly et a/., U.S. patent No.
`4,816,567; Morrison, S.L. et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81:6851-6855
`(1984); Boulianne, G. L. et a/., Nature 312:643-646 (1984); Neuberger, M.
`
`S. et al., Nature 314:268-270 (1985))..The term"chimeric" antibody is used
`herein to describe a polypeptide comprising at least the antigen binding
`portion of an antibody molecule linked to at least part of another protein |
`
`(typically an immunoglobulin constant domain).
`The isotype of the human constant domain maybeselected totailor
`
`10
`
`15
`
`"20
`
`30
`
`

`

`the chimeric antibody for participation in antibody-dependent cellular
`cytotoxicity (ADCC) and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (see e.g.
`Briiggemann,M.et a/., J. Exp. Med. 166:1351-1361 (1987); Riechmann,L.
`et al., Nature 332:323-327 (1988); Love et a/., Methods in Enzymology
`“178:515-527 (1989); Bindon et a/., J. Exp. Med. 168:127-142 (1988).
`In the typical embodiment, such chimeric antibodies contain about
`
`one third rodent (or other non-human species) sequence and thus are capable
`of eliciting a significant anti-globulin response in humans. For example,in the
`-case of
`the murine anti-CD3 antibody, OKT3, much of
`the resulting
`anti-globulin responseis directed against the variable region rather than the
`constant region (Jaffers, G. J. et al, Transplantation 41:572-578 (1986)).
`in a further effort
`to resolve the antigen binding functions of
`antibodies and to minimize the use of heterologous sequences-in human
`antibodies, Winter and colleagues (Jones, P. T. et al., Nature 321:522-525
`(1986); Riechmann, L. et al., Nature 332:323-327 (1988); Verhoeyen, M. et
`al., Science 239:1534-1536 (1988)).have substituted rodent CDRs or CDR
`sequences for the corresponding segments of a humanantibody. As used
`herein,
`the term "humanized" antibody is an embodiment of chimeric
`‘antibodies wherein substantially less than an intact human variable domain
`has been substituted by the corresponding sequence from a non-human
`species.
`In practice, humanized antibodies are typically human antibodies in
`which some CDRresidues and possibly some FR residues are substituted by
`residues from analogous sites in rodent antibodies.
`,
`The therapeutic promise of this approachis supported by the clinical
`efficacy of a humanized antibody specific for the CAMPATH-1 antigen with
`two non-Hodgkin lymphomapatients, one of whom had previously developed
`an anti-globulin response to the parentalrat antibody (Riechmann, L. et a/.,
`Nature 332:323-327 (1988); Hale, G. et a/., Lancet ist 394-1399 (1988)).
`A murine antibody to the interleukin 2 receptor has also recently been
`humanized (Queen, C. et a/., Proc. Natl, Acad. Sci. USA 86:10029-10033
`(1989)) as a potential immunosuppressive reagent. Additional references
`related to humanization of antibodies include Co et a/., Proc. Natl, Acad. Sci.
`4uv
`
`10
`
`20
`
`30
`
`
`
`

`

`USA 88:2869-2873 (1991); Gorman et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
`88:4181-4185 (1991); Daugherty etal., NucleicAcids Research 19(9):2471-
`2476 (1991); Brown et al., Proc. Nath Acad. Sci, USA 88:2663-2667
`(1991); Junghanset a/., Cancer Research 50:1495-1502 (1 990).
`In some cases, substituting CDRs from rodent antibodies for the
`human CDRs in human frameworks is sufficient to transfer high antigen
`binding affinity (Jones, P. T. et a/., Nature 321:522-525 (1986); Verhoeyen,
`M. et al., Science 239:1534-1536 (1988)), whereas in-other casesit has
`been necessary to additionally replace one (Riechmann,L. et a/., Nature |
`332:323-327 (1988)) or several (Queen, C. et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
`86:10029-10033 {1989)) framework region (FR) residues. See also Co ef.
`
`a/., supra.
`.
`.
`For a given antibody a small number of FR residues are anticipated
`to be important for antigen binding. Firstly for example, certain antibodies
`have been shown to contain a few FR residues which directly contact antigen
`in crystal structures of antibody-antigen complexes (e.g., reviewed in Davies,
`D. R. et a/., Ann. Rev. Biochem. 59:439-473 (1990)). Secondly, a number
`of FR residues have beenproposed by Chothia, Lesk and colleagues (Chothia,
`. & Lesk, A. M., J. Mol, Biol. 196:901-917. (1987); Chothia, C. e¢ a/.,
`Nature 342:877-883 (1989); Tramontano, A. et al.,
`J. Mol. Biol.
`215:175-182 (1990)) as critically affecting the conformation of particular
`CDRsand thustheir contribution to antigen binding. See also Margolies et
`‘al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 72:2180-2184 (1975).
`It is also known that, in a few instances, an antibody variable
`‘domain (either V,, or V,) may contain glycosylation sites, and that this
`glycosylation may improve
`or
`abolish antigen binding, Pluckthun,
`Biotechnology 9:545-51 (1991); Spiegelberget a/., Biochemistry 9:4217-
`4223 (1 970); Wallic et a/., J. Exp. Med. 168:1099-1109 (1988); Sox etal,
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 66:975-982 (1970); Margni et a/., Ann. Rev.
`Immunol. 6:535-554 (1988). Ordinarily, however, glycosylation has no
`_ influence on the antigen-binding properties of an antibody, Pluckthun, supra,
`
`(1991).
`
`10
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`30
`
`
`
`

`

`' The three-dimensional structure of immunoglobulin chains has been
`studied, and crystal structures for intact ifnmunoglobulins, for a variety of
`
`immunoglobulin fragments, and for antibody-antigen complexes have been
`
`published (see e.g., Saul et a/., Journal of Biological Chemistry 25:585-97
`re 978); Sheriff et a/., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84:8075-79 (1987); Segal
`et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 71:4298-4302 (1974): Eppet al.,
`Biochemistry 14(22):4943-4952 (1975); Marquart
`et a/., J. Mol. Biol.
`141:369-391 (1980); Furey et a/., J. Mol.Biol. 1 67:661-692 (1983); Snow
`and Amzel, Protein: Structure, Function, and Genetics 1:267-279, Alan R.
`Liss, Inc. pubs. (1986); Chothia and Lesk,J. Mo/. Biol. 196:901-917 (1 987):.
`Chothia eta/., Nature 342:877-883 (1989); Chothia eta/., Science 233:755-
`58 (1986); Huber et a/., Nature 264:415-420 (1976); Bruccoleri et a/.,
`Nature 335:564-568 (1988) and Nature 336:266 (1988); Sherman et a/.;
`Journal of Biological Chemistry 263:4064-4074 (1988); Amzel and Poljak,
`‘Ann. Rev. Biochem. 48:961-67 (1979); Silverton et al, Proc. Natl. Acad.
`Sci. USA 74:5140-5144 (1977); and Gregory et a/., Molecular Immunology
`24:821-829 (1987).
`It
`is known that the function of an antibody is
`dependent on its
`three dimensional
`structure, and that amino acid
`substitutions can change the three-dimensional structure of an antibody,
`Snow and Amzel, supra.
`It has previously been shown that the antigen
`binding affinity of a humanized antibody can.be increased by mutagenesis
`based upon molecular modelling (Riechmann,L. et a/., Nature 332:323-327
`(1988); Queen, C. et a/., Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 86:10029-10033
`
`(1989)).
`
`.
`Humanizing an antibody with retention of high affinity for antigen
`‘and other desired biological activities is at present difficult to achieve using
`currently available procedures. Methods are needed for rationalizing the
`selection of sites for substitution in preparing such antibodies and thereby
`increasing the efficiency of antibody humanization.
`The proto-oncogene HER2
`(human epidermal growth factor.
`receptor 2) encodes a protéin tyrosine kinase (p1g5HER2) that is relatedto
`and. somewhat homologous to the human epidermal growth factor receptor
`
`5
`
`au
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`30
`
`
`
`

`

`“
`
`
`
`15
`
`20
`
`30
`
`eo ®
`(see Coussens,L. et a/., Science 230:1132-1139 (1985); Yamamoto,T. et
`al., Nature 319:230-234 (1986); King, C. R. et al., Science 229:974-976 |
`Q 985). HER2is also knownin thefield as c-erbB-2, and sometimes by the
`name of the rathomolog, neu. Amplification and/or overexpression of HER2.
`is associated with multiple human malignancies and appears to be integrally
`involved in progression of 25-30% of human breast and ovarian cancers
`(Slamon, D. J. et al., Science 235:17.7-182 (1987), Slamon, D. J. et a/.,
`Science 244:707-712 (1989)). Furthermore, the extent of amplification is
`inverselycorrelated with the observed median patient survival time (Slamon,
`supra, Science 1989).
`—_ Ce .
`.
`The murine monoclonal antibody known as muMAb4D5 (Fendly, B.
`M. et af, Cancer Res. 50:1550-1558- (1990)), directed against
`the
`extracellular domain (ECD) of p18S4ER2, specifically inhibits the growth of
`tumor cell lines overexpressing p1 g5HER2 in monolayer culture or in soft agar
`(Hudziak, R. M. et al., Molec. Cell, Biol. '9:1165-1172 (1989); Lupu,R. et af,
`Science 249:1552-1555 (1990)). MuMAb4D5also has the potential of
`enhancing tumor cell sensitivity to tumor necrosis factor, an important
`effector molecule in macrophage-mediated tumorcell cytotoxicity (Hudziak,
`supra, 1989; Shepard, H. M. ‘and Lewis, G. D. J. Clinical Immunology-
`8:333-395 (1988)). Thus muMAb4D5 has potential for clinical intervention
`in and imaging of carcinomas in which pi gsHeR2 is overexpressed. The
`muMAb4D5 and its uses are described in copending U.S. patent applications
`07/143,912 and 07/147,461, and in corresponding PCT application WO
`89/06692 published 27 July 1989. This murine antibody was deposited
`with the ATCC and designated ATCC CRL 10463. However,this antibody
`may be immunogenic in humans.
`.
`it is therefore an object of this invention to provide methodsfor the
`preparation of antibodies whichare less antigenic in humans than non-human
`antibodies but have desired antigen binding and other characteristics and
`activities.
`.
`It is a further object of this invention to provide methods for the
`efficient humanization of antibodies, i.e. selecting non-human amino acid
`
`6
`
`12
`
`

`

` — e
`eo
`residues for importation into. a human antibody background sequence in such
`a fashion as to retain or
`improve the affinity of the non-human donor
`antibody for a given antigen.
`,
`It
`is another object of
`this invention to provide humanized
`antibodies capable of binding pig5hER2
`Other objects, features, and characteristics of the present invention
`will become apparent upon consideration of the following description and the
`appended claims.
`
`.
`
`Summary
`
`of
`
`the Invention
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`d.
`
`The objects of this invention are accomplished. by a method for
`making a humanized antibody comprising amino acid sequence of an import,
`non-human antibody anda human antibody, comprising the steps of:
`a.
`obtaining the amino acid sequencesof at least a portion
`of animport antibody variable domain and of a consensus
`human variable domain;
`.
`identifying Complementarity Determining Region (CDR)
`amino acid sequences in ‘the import and the human
`variable domain sequences;
`|
`;
`.
`substituting an import CDR amino acid sequencefor the
`corresponding human CDR amino acid sequence;
`aligning the amino acid sequences of a Framework Region
`(FR) of the import antibody and the corresponding FR of
`the consensus antibody:
`identifying import antibody FR residues in the aligned FR
`sequencesthat are non-homologous to thecorresponding
`consensus antibody residues;
`-determining if the non-homologous import amino acid
`residue Is reasonably expected to have at least one of the
`following effects:
`1.
`non-covalently binds antigen directly,
`
`e.
`
`f.
`
`13
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`30
`
`
`
`

`

`g.
`
`interacts with a CDR; or
`2.
`participates in the V, - V,, interface; and
`3.
`for. any non--homologous import antibody amino acid
`residue whichis reasonably expected to have at least one-
`of
`these effects,
`substituting that
`residue for
`the
`corresponding amino acid residue in the consensus
`antibody FR sequence.
`|
`Optionally, the method of this invention comprises the additional
`stepsof determining if any non-homologous residues identified in step (e)are
`exposedon the surface of the domain or buried within it, and if the residue
`is exposed but has none of the effects identified in step (f), retaining the
`consensusresidue.
`|
`‘Additionally, in certain embodirnents the method of this invention
`comprises the feature wherein the corresponding consensus antibody -
`residues identified in step (e) above are selected from the group consisting
`of 4L, 35L, 36L, 38L, 43L, 44L, 46L, 58L, 62L, 63L, 64L, 65L, 66L, 67L,
`68L, 69L, 7OL, 71L, 73L, 85L; 87L, 98L, 2H, 4H, 24H, 36H, 37H, 39H,
`43H, 45H, 49H, 58H, 60H, 68H, 69H, 70H, 73H, 74H, 75H, 76H, 78H,
`91 H, 92H, 93H, and 103H(utilizing the numbering system set forthin Kabat,
`E. A. et al, Sequences of ‘Proteins of Immunological interest (National
`Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 1987).
`In certain embodiments, the method ofthis invention comprises the
`additional steps of searching either or both of the import, non-human and the
`consensus variable domain sequences for glycosylation|sites,determining if
`reneeSate eenmwenre9ARO
`. RCA Beh
`ate
`the glycosylation is reasonablyexexpected to be important for the desired
`antigenbindingand biological activity oftheantibody(i.e.é.,,_determiningi ifthe.
`glycosylation site binds to antigen or changes a side chain of an amino acid
`residue that binds to antigen, or if the glycosylation enhances or weakens
`antigen binding, or is important for maintainingantibody affinity).
`If the
`importsequence bearstheglycosylation site, itis preferred to substitutethat
`site for the corresponding residues in the consensus human sequenceif the
`glycosylation site is reasonably expected to be important.
`If only the
`
`15
`
`20
`
`30
`
`
`

`
`—_—s
`
`14
`
`

`

`consensus sequence, and not the import, bears the glycosylation site, it is
`preferred to eliminate that glycosylation site or substitute therefor the ,
`corresponding amino acid residues from the import sequence.
`
`Another embodiment of this invention comprises aligning import
`
`\
`
`identifying. import
`antibody and the consensus antibody FR sequences,
`_ antibody FR residues which are non-homologous with the aligned consensus
`FR sequence, and for each such non-homologous import antibody FR residue,
`determining if the corresponding consensus antibody residue represents a
`residue which is highly conserved acrossall species at that site, and if it is
`so conserved, preparing a humanized _antibody which comprises the
`consensus antibody amino acid residue at that site..
`Certain alternate embodiments of the methods of this invention
`comprise obtaining the amino acid sequence of at least a portion. of an
`import, non-human antibody variable domain having a CDR and a FR,
`_ obtaining the amino acid sequence of at least a portion of a consensus
`human antibody variable domain having a CDR and a FR, substituting the
`non-human CDR for the human CDRin the consensus human antibody
`variable domain, and then substituting
`an amino acid residue for the .
`consensus aminoacid residue at at least one of the following sites:
`a.
`(in the FR of the variable domainof the light chain) 4L,
`35L, 36L, 38L, 43L, 44L, 58L, 46L, 62L, 63L, 64L, 65L,
`66L, B7L, BBL, GOL, 7OL, 71L, 73L, BSL, 87L, BL,or
`"(in the FR of the variable domain of the heavy chain) 2H,
`4H, 24H, 36H, 37H, 39H, 43H, 45H, 49H, 58H, 60H,-
`68H, 69H, 70H, 73H, 74H, 75H, 76H, 78H, 91H, 92H, |
`93H, and 103H.
`in preferred embodiments, the non-CDRresidue substituted at the consensus
`FR site is the residue found at the corresponding location of the non-human
`antibody.
`,
`|
`Optionally, this just-recited embodiment comprises the additional
`steps of following the method steps appearing at the beginning of this
`summary and determining whether aparticular amino acid residue can
`
`b.
`
`15
`
`15
`
`20
`
`30
`
`
`
`

`

`@
`eo
`reasonably be expected to have undesirable effects.
`This invention also relates to a humanized antibody comprising the
`
`-
`
`CDR sequence of an import, non-human antibody and the FR sequenceof a
`human antibody, wherein an amino acid residue within the human FR
`sequence located at any one. of the sites 4L, 35L, 36L, 38L, 43L, 44L, 46L,
`58L, 62L, 63L, 64L, 65L, GEL, G7L, 6BL, 69L, 7OL, 7IL, 73L, BBL, 87L,
`98L, 2H, 4H, 24H, 36H, 37H, 39H, 43H, 45H, 49H, 58H, 6OH, 68H, 69H,
`70H, 73H, 74H, 75H, 76H, 78H, 91H, 92H, 93H, and 103H has been
`substituted by another residue.
`In preferred embodiments,
`the residue
`_ substituted at the human FRsite is the residue found at the corresponding
`location of the non-human antibody from which the non-human CDR was _
`obtained.
`In other embodiments, no human FRresidue other than those set
`forth in this group has been substituted.
`- This invention also encompasses specific humanized antibody
`variable domains, and isolated polypeptides having homology with the
`following sequences.
`4. SEQ.
`ID NO. 1, which is thelight ‘chain variable domain of a
`humanized version of muMAb4D5:
`DIOMTOSPSSLSASVGDRVTITCRASQDVNTAVAWYQQKPGKAP
`KLLIY SASFLESGVPSRFSGSRSGTDFTLTISSLOPEDFATYYCQQHY
`TTPPTFGOGTKVEIKRT
`,
`
`_
`;
`
`2. SEQ. ID NO. 2, which is the heavy chain variable domain ofa
`humanized version of muMAb4D5):
`- EVOLVESGGGLVOPGGSLRLSCAASGFNIKDTYIHWVROAPGKGLE
`WVARIYPTNGYTRYADSVKGRFTISADTSKNTAYLOMNSLRAEDT
`AVYYCSRWGGDGFYAMDVWGOGTLVTVSS
`
`In another aspect, this invention provides a consensus human
`antibody variable domain amino acid sequencefor use in the preparation of
`humanized antibodies, methods for obtaining, using, and storing a computer .
`representation of such a consensus sequence, and computers comprising the
`
`10
`
`16
`
`20 ,
`
`30
`
`
`
`

`

`In one embodiment, the following
`sequence data of such a sequence.
`consensus human antibody variable domain. amino acid sequences are
`
`provided:
`
`SEQ. ID NO. 3 light chain):
`DIOMTOSPSSLSASVGDRVTITCRASQDVSSYLAWYQOKPGKAPK
`LLIYAASSLESGVPSRFSGSGSGTDFTLTISSLOPEDFATYYCQQYN
`SLPYTFGQGTKVEIKRT, and
`.
`
`;
`SEQ..ID NO. 4 (heavy chain):
`EVOLVESGGGLVOPGGSLRLSCAASGFTFSDYAMSWVRQAPGKG
`LEWVAVISENGGYTRYADSVKGRFTISADTSKNTAYLQMNSLRAE
`DTAVYYCSRWGGDGFYAMDVWGQGTLVTVSS
`
`Brief Description of the Drawings
`
`FIGURE 1A shows the comparison of the V; domain amino acid
`residues of muUMAb4D5, huMAb4D5, and a consensus human sequence (Fig.
`1A, SEQ.ID NO. 5, SEQ. ID NO. 1 and SEQ. ID NO. 3, respectively). FIGURE
`1B shows the comparison between the Vi, domain aminoacid residues of the
`muMAb4d5, huMAb4D5, and a consensus human sequence (Fig. 1B, SEQ.
`ID NO. 6, SEQ. ID NO. 2:and SEQ.ID NO. 4, respectively). Both Figs 1A and
`1B use the generally accepted numbering scheme from Kabat, E. A., et a/.,
`Sequences of Proteins of Immunological Interest (National Institutes of
`Health, Bethesda, MD (1987)).
`In both Fig. 1A and Fig. 1B, the CDR
`residues determined according to a standard sequencedefinition (as in Kabat,
`E. A. et al., Sequences of Proteins of Immunological Interest (National
`“Institutes of ‘Health, Bethesda, MD, 1987)) are indicated by the first
`underlining beneath the sequences, and the CDR residues determined
`according to a structural definition (as in Chothia, C. & Lesk, A. M., J. Mol.
`
`Biol. 196:901-917 (1987)) are indicated by the second, lower underlines.
`
`11
`
`17
`
`10
`
`20
`
`30
`
`
`
`

`

`Pod
`
`are shownby the verticallines.
`ie The mismatches between
`FIGURE 2 shows a scheme for humanization of muMAb4D5 V,and
`Vy, by gene conversion mutagenesis.
`FIGURE 3 showstheinhibition of SK-BR-3 proliferation by MAb4D5
`variants. Relative cell proliferation was determined as described (Hudziak,R.
`M. et a/., Molec. Cell. Biol. 9:1165-1172 (1989)) and data (average of
`triplicate determinations) are presented as a percentage of results with
`untreated cultures for MUMAb4D5(}), huMAb4D5-8 (n) and huMAb4D5-1 ();
`FIGURE 4 showsa stereo view of'a-carbon tracing for model of
`huMAb4D5-8 V, and Vy. The CDR residues (Kabat, E. A. et a/., Sequences
`of Proteins ofImmunologicalInterest (NationalInstitutes of Health, Bethesda,
`MD, 1987)) are shownin bold and. side chains of Vi residues A71, 773,
`A78, $93, Y102 and Vy residues Y55 plus R66 (see Table 1) are shown.
`
`Detailed Description of the Invention
`
`Definitions
`the following words or phrases have the indicated:
`In general,
`definitions when used in the description, examples, and claims:
`The murine monoclonal antibody known as muMAb4D5 (Fendly, B
`M. et al., Cancer Res. 50:1550-1558 (1990)) is directed against
`the
`extracellular domain (ECD) of p1gsHeR2, The muMAb4D5 and its uses are
`described in
`copending U.S. patent
`applications 07/143,912 and
`_07/147,461, and in corresponding PCT application WO 89/06692 published
`' 27 July 1989. This murine antibody was deposited with the ATCC and
`designated ATCC CRL 10463.
`In this description and claims, the terms
`muMAb4D5, chMAb4D5 and huMAb4D5represent murine, chimerized and
`humanized versions of the monoclonal antibody 4D5, respectively.
`A humanized antibody for the purposes hereinis an immunoglobulin
`amino acid sequence variant or fragment thereof which is capable of binding
`toa predetermined antigen and which comprises a FR region having
`
`12
`
`18
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`30
`
`
`
`

`

`substantially the amino acid sequence of a human immunoglobulin and a CDR
`having
`substantially
`the
`amino acid
`sequence
`of
`a
`non-human
`immunoglobulin.
`In general, the humanized antibody will comprise substantially all of
`at least one, and typically two, variable domains (Fab)
`in which all or
`
`- substantially all of the CDR regions correspond to those of a non-human
`immunoglobulin and all or substantially all of the FR regions are those of a
`human immunoglobulin consensus sequence.
`‘The humanized antibody
`optimally also will comprise at least a.portion of an immunoglobulin constant
`region (Fo),
`typically that of a human immunoglobulin. Ordinarily,
`the
`_antibody will contain both the light chain as well as at least the variable
`domain of a heavy chain. The antibody also may include the CH?1, hinge,
`CH2, CH3, and CH4 regions of the heavy chain.
`The humanized antibody will be selected from any class of
`immunoglobulins,
`including IgM, IgG, IgD, IgA and IgE, and any isotype,
`including IgG1, IgG2, IgG3 and IgG4. Usually the constant domain is a °
`complement fixing constant domain whereit is desired that the humanized
`antibody exhibit cytotoxic activity, and the classis typically IgG,. Where
`such cytotoxic activity is not desirable, the constant domain maybe of the
`igG, class. The humanized antibody may comprise sequences. from more.
`than one class or isotype, and selecting particular constant domains to
`optimize desired effector functions is within the ordinary skill in the art..
`The FR and CDR regions of the humanized antibody need not
`
`—
`
`correspond precisely to the parental sequences, e.g., the import CDR or the
`consensus FR may be mutagenized by substitution, insertion or deletion of
`a residue so that the CDR or FR residue at that site does not correspond to.
`
`‘either the consensus or the import antibody. Such mutations, however, will
`not be extensive. Usually, at least 75% of the humanized antibody residues
`will correspond to those of the parental FR and CDR sequences, more often
`' 90%, and most preferably greater than 95%.
`in general, humanized antibodies prepared by the methodofthis
`invention are produced by a process of analysis of the parental sequences
`
`13
`
`19.
`
`10
`
`15.
`
`20
`
`30
`
`
`
`

`

`|
`
`@
`
`10
`
`_ and various conceptual humanized products using three dimensional models
`of
`the
`parental
`and
`humanized
`sequences.
`Three
`dimensional
`immunoglobulin models are commonly available and are familiar to those
`’ skilled in the art. Computer programs are available which illustrate and
`display probable three dimensional conformational structures of selected ~
`candidate immunoglobulin sequences.
`Inspection of these displays permits
`analysis of the likely role of the residues in the functioning of-the candidate
`immunoglobulin sequence, i.e., the analysisofresidues that influence the
`ability of the candidate immunoglobulin to bind its antigen.
`Residues that influence antigen binding are defined to be residues -
`that are substantially responsible for the antigen affinity or antigen specificity |
`of acandidate immunoglobulin, in a positive or a negative sense, The object
`here is toselect FR residues from the consensus and import sequence so that
`the desired immunoglobulin characteristic is achieved. Such desired
`characteristics include increases in affinity and greater specificity for the
`target antigen, although itis conceivable that in some circumstances the
`opposite. effects might be desired. - In general, the CDR residues are directly _
`and most substantially involved in influencing antigen binding (although not
`all CDR residues are so involved and therefore need not be substituted into ©
`the consensus sequence). However, FR residues also have a significant
`effect and can exert their influence in. at least three ways: They may .-
`noncovalently directly bind to antigen, they mayinteract with CDR residues
`and they may affect the interface between the heavy and light chains.
`A residue that noncovalently directly binds to antigen is one that,
`by three dimensional analysis,
`is reasonably expected to noncovalently
`directly bind to antigen. Typically, it is necessary to impute the position of
`antigen from the spatial location of neighboring CDRsandthe dimensionsand
`structure of the target antigen. In general, only those humanized antibody
`‘residues that are capable of
`forming salt bridges, hydrogen bonds, or
`“hydrophobic interactions arelikely to be involved in non-covalent antigen
`binding, however residues which are2SeparatedS|spatially by,3.2{Angstroms )
`ee
`~~|angrier
`_orless may also non-covalently interact.
`Suchresidues typically are the
`essMaya'soNon’covereyeee
`
`'
`
`414
`
`20
`
`Jw
`
`20
`
`30
`
`
`
`

`

`e
`

`
`relatively larger aminoacids,suchastyrosine,arginine,andlysine. Antigen-
`binding FR residuesalso typically will have side chains that are oriented into
`an envelope surrounding the solvent oriented face of a CDR which extends
`about 7 Angstroms into the solvent from the CDR domain and about 7
`Angstroms on either side of the CDR domain, again as visualized by three
`dimensional modeling.
`.
`,
`-
`A residue that interacts with a CDR generally.is a residue that either
`affects the conformation of the CDR polypeptide backbone or forms a
`noncovalent bond with a CDR residue side chain. Conformation-affecting
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`30
`
`
`
`residues ordinarily are those that change the spatial position of any CDR 7
`backbone atom (N, Ca, C, O, Cf) by more, than about 0.2 Angstroms.
`Backbone atoms of CDR sequences are displaced for example by residues ,
`that interrupt or modify organized structures such as beta sheets,helices o

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket