`Trials@uspto.gov
`Paper No. 30
`571-272-7822
`Entered: December 15, 2017
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`Pfizer, Inc.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`GENENTECH, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-01488
`Patent 6,407,213
`____________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before SHERIDAN K. SNEDDEN, ZHENYU YANG, and
`ROBERT A. POLLOCK, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`POLLOCK, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ERRATUM
`
`Institution of Inter Partes Review
`37 C.F.R. § 42.108
`
`An error was made in the conclusory section (IV. ORDER) of the
`Board’s December 1, 2017 Decision (Paper 27) omitting claims 73, 74, and
`77 under 35 U.S.C. §103, otherwise identified as subject to institution of
`inter partes review.
`
`
`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`Case IPR2017-01488
`Patent No. 6,407,213
`
`
`In addition, the order commencing inter partes review incorrectly
`identified the patent at issue as “’158.” The following correction of the
`conclusory section corrects the errors contained in the Board’s Decision of
`December 1, 2017:
`
`Accordingly, it is
`ORDERED that pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314, an inter partes review is
`hereby instituted on the following grounds:
`1. claims 1, 2, 25, 29, 63, 66, 67, 71, 72, 75, 76, 80, and 81, as
`anticipated by Kurrle;
`
`IV. ORDER
`
`2. claims 1, 2, 4, 25, 29, 62–64, 66, 67, 69, 71, 72, 75, 76, 78,
`80, and 81, as obvious over the combination of Kurrle and
`Queen 1990;
`
`3. claims 1, 2, 4, 29, 62–64, 80, and 81 as anticipated by Queen
`1990;
`
`4. claim 12 as obvious over the combination of Kurrle, Queen
`1990, and Furey;
`
`5. claims 73 and 77 as obvious over the combination of Kurrle,
`Queen 1990, and Chothia & Lesk;
`
`6. claim 74 as obvious over the combination of Kurrle, Queen
`1990, and Chothia 1985;
`
`7. claims 65 and 79 as obvious over the combination of Kurrle,
`Queen 1990, Chothia & Lesk, and Chothia 1985;
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`Case IPR2017-01488
`Patent No. 6,407,213
`
`
`8. claims 30, 31, 33, and 42 as obvious over the combination of
`Queen 1990 and Hudziak;
`
`9. claim 42 as obvious over the combination of Queen 1990,
`Furey, and Hudziak; and
`
`10. claim 60 as obvious over the combination of Queen 1990,
`Chothia & Lesk, and Hudziak; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that no other ground of unpatentability is
`authorized in this inter partes review;
`FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), inter
`partes review of the ’213 patent is hereby instituted commencing on the
`entry date of this Order, and pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(c) and 37 C.F.R. §
`42.4, notice is hereby given of the institution of a trial; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall, within two weeks of the
`entry date of this Order, file a joint statement indicating which, if any,
`portions of this Decision are requested to remain sealed subject to the
`protective order entered in this case.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`Case IPR2017-01488
`Patent No. 6,407,213
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Amanda Hollis
`Stefan M. Miller
`Karen Younkins
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`amanda.hollis@kirkland.com
`stefan.miller@kirkland.com
`karen.younkins@kirkland.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`David L. Cavanaugh
`Rebecca A. Whitfield
`Robert J. Gunther, Jr.
`Lisa J. Pirozzolo
`Andrew J. Danford
`Kevin S. Prussia
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP
`david.cavanaugh@wilmerhale.com
`Rebecca.Whitfield@wilmerhale.com
`Robert.Gunther@wilmerhale.com
`Lisa.Pirozzolo@wilmerhale.com
`Andrew.Danford@wilmerhale.com
`Kevin.Prussia@wilmerhale.com
`
`Adam R. Brausa
`Daralyn J. Durie
`DURIE TANGRI LLP
`abrausa@durietangri.com
`ddurie@durietangri.com
`
`
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
