`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`PFIZER, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`GENENTECH, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-01488
`Patent 6,407,213 B2
`____________
`
`DECLARATION OF BENJAMIN A. LASKY IN SUPPORT OF
`PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR THE PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION
`
`
`
`PFIZER EX. 1190
`Pfizer v. Genentech
`IPR2017-01488
`
`
`
`Declaration of Benjamin A. Lasky in Support of
`Petitioner’s Motion for the Pro Hac Vice Admission of Benjamin A. Lasky
`
`
`I, Benjamin A. Lasky, do hereby declare:
`
`1.
`
`I am a Partner in the law firm Kirkland & Ellis LLP. Lead counsel in
`
`the inter partes review proceeding is Amanda Hollis, who also is a Partner in the
`
`law firm Kirkland & Ellis LLP, and is registered to practice before the PTO and
`
`holds Registration No. 55,629. Backup counsel are (1) Stefan Miller, who is a
`
`Partner in the law firm Kirkland & Ellis LLP, and is registered to practice before
`
`the PTO and holds Registration No. 57,623 and; (2) Karen Younkins, who is an
`
`Associate in the law firm Kirkland & Ellis LLP, and is registered to practice before
`
`the PTO and holds Registration No. 67,554. With respect to the proceeding, I will
`
`work closely with Ms. Hollis, Mr. Miller and Ms. Younkins.
`
`2.
`
`I hold a Bachelor of Science degree in Genetics and a Bachelor of
`
`Laws from the University of New South Wales, Australia.
`
`3.
`
`I have approximately fifteen (15) years of experience as a litigation
`
`attorney, specializing in patent litigation and representing clients in patent
`
`litigation matters in various United States District Courts, and the Court of Appeals
`
`for the Federal Circuit. My experience includes numerous matters in the life
`
`sciences and pharmaceuticals arts. I have particular experience relevant to the
`
`technological and legal matters at issue in this proceeding, including matters
`
`concerning monoclonal antibody therapies and methods of preparing antibodies,
`
`including representing Pfizer, Inc. (“Petitioner”) with a number of related matters.
`
`
`
`1
`
`PFIZER EX. 1190
`Pfizer v. Genentech
`IPR2017-01488
`
`
`
`Declaration of Benjamin A. Lasky in Support of
`Petitioner’s Motion for the Pro Hac Vice Admission of Benjamin A. Lasky
`
`I am, therefore, an experienced patent litigation attorney with particular expertise
`
`that is pertinent to the proceeding. Petitioner desires, and has a need, to be
`
`represented in certain aspects of this proceeding by an experienced patent litigation
`
`attorney who has particular expertise that is relevant to the issues involved.
`
`4.
`
`I am very familiar with U.S. Patent No. 6,407,213, and with the legal
`
`subject matter, technical subject matter, and prior art discussed in the Request for
`
`Inter Partes Review. I have personally reviewed the patent at issue, as well as the
`
`prosecution history, submissions filed in this proceeding, and accompanying
`
`declarations and exhibits. I have been and continue to be actively involved with
`
`strategy and with the factual and technical developments in that matter.
`
`5.
`
`I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of New York,
`
`U.S. District Courts for the Southern District of New York, Eastern District of
`
`New York and Eastern District of Michigan, and the Court of Appeals for the
`
`Federal Circuit.
`
`6.
`
`I have never been suspended or disbarred from practice before any
`
`court or administrative body.
`
`7.
`
`I have never had a court or administrative body deny my application
`
`for admission to practice.
`
`8.
`
`I have never been sanctioned or cited for contempt by any court or
`
`administrative body.
`
`
`
`2
`
`PFIZER EX. 1190
`Pfizer v. Genentech
`IPR2017-01488
`
`
`
`Declaration of Benjamin A. Lasky in Support of
`Petitioner’s Motion for the Pro Hac Vice Admission of Benjamin A. Lasky
`
`
`9.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of 37 C.F.R.
`
`10.
`
`I agree to be subject to the United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`Code of Professional Responsibility set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et. seq. and
`
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`11.
`
`I have previously been admitted pro hac vice as counsel in IPR2014-
`
`00949, IPR2017-00804, IPR2017-00805 and IPR2017-00737.
`
`12.
`
`I declare that all statements made herein of my own knowledge are
`
`true and that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true;
`
`and further that these statements were made with the knowledge that willful, false
`
`statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both,
`
`under Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
`
`
`
`Date: November 2, 2017
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /Benjamin A. Lasky/
`Benjamin A. Lasky
`Kirkland & Ellis LLP
`601 Lexington Avenue
`New York, NY 10022
`Telephone: (212) 446-6415
`Facsimile: (212) 446-4900
`benjamin.lasky@kirkland.com
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PFIZER EX. 1190
`Pfizer v. Genentech
`IPR2017-01488
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
