throbber
PCT
`
`WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION
`International Bureau
`
`INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT)
`
`. (SlJiiternational Patent Classification 4 :
`A:61'K 39/395, C12N 15/00
`C:12P 21/00
`
`A2
`
`(11) International Publication Number:
`
`WO 89/01783
`
`(43) International Publication Date:
`
`9 March 1989 (09.03.89)
`
`, (ti)International Application Number:
`
`PCT/GB88f00731
`
`(22):1ittemational Filing Date: 5 September 1988 (05.09.88)
`
`(74) Agent: MERCER, Christopher, Paul; Carpmaels &
`Ransford, 43 Bloomsbury Square, London WC1A
`2RA(GB).
`
`...
`
`~a:t~;Priority Application Number:
`
`8720833
`
`· (32) Priority Date:
`
`4 September 1987 (04.09.87)
`
`(33) Priority Country:
`
`GB
`
`(81) Designated States: AT (European patent), AU, BE (Eu(cid:173)
`ropean patent), CH (European patent), DE (Euro(cid:173)
`pean patent), DK, FI, FR (European patent), GB
`(European patent), HU, IT (European patent), JP,
`KR, LU (European patent), NL (European patent),
`NO, RO, SE (European patent), SU, US.
`
`(Vl~lApplieant (for all designated States except US): CELL(cid:173)
`TECH LIMITED [GB/GB]; 216 Bath Road, Slough,
`Berkshire SL1 4EN (GB).
`
`(l72) Inventors; and
`· (~Inventors/Applicants (for US only) : BODMER, Mark,
`William [GB/GB]; 131 Reading Road, Henley-on(cid:173)
`Thames, Oxfordshire RG19 1DJ (GB). ADAIR, John,
`Robert [GB/GB]; 23 George Road, Stokenchurch,
`High Wycombe HP14 3RN (GB). WHITTLE, Nigel,
`Richard [GBJGB]; 5 Leigh Road, Cobham, Surrey
`KT11 2LF (GB).
`
`(S"4)1'.liitle: RECOMBINANT ANTIBODY AND METHOD
`
`($))Abstract
`
`The present invention provides a humanised antibody
`molecule (HAM) having specificity for the TAG-72 antigen
`and having an antigen binding site wherein at least the com(cid:173)
`plementarity determining regions (CDRs) of the variable do(cid:173)
`main· are: derived from the mouse monoclonal antibody B72.3
`(BVZ:Y MAb) and the remaining immunoglobulin-derived
`partS'-oflhe HAM are derived from a human immunoglobulin
`andi a process for its production.
`
`Published
`Without international search report and to be repu(cid:173)
`blished upon receipt of that report.
`
`•
`
`A
`
`50
`30
`10
`GAATTCCCACTGACTCTAACCATGGAATGGAGCTGGGTCTTTCTCTTCTTCCTGTCAGTA
`MetG 1 uTrpSerTrpVa1PheLeuPhePheLeuserva 1
`
`7
`llO
`90
`70
`ACTACAGGTGTCCACTCCCAGGTTCAGCTGCAGCAGTCTGACGCTGAGTTGGTGAAACCT
`ThrThrG1yVa1HisSerG1nVa1G1nLeuG1nG1nSerAspA1aGluLeuVa1LysPro
`
`170
`150
`130
`GGGGCTTCAGTGAAGATATCCTGCAAGGCTTCTGGCTACACCTTCACTGACCATGCTATT
`GlyAlaSerValLysileSercysLysA1aSerG1yTyrThrPheThrAspHisA1aile
`
`230
`210
`190
`CACTGGGCGAAGCAGAAGCCTGAACAGGGCCTGGAATGGATTGGATATATTTCTCCCGGA
`HisTrpAlaLysGlnLysProG1uG1nGlyLeuGluTrpileGlyTyrileSerProGly
`
`290
`270
`250
`AATGATGATATTAAGTACAATGAGAAGTTCAAGGGCAAGGC~ACACTGACTGCAGACAAA
`AsnAspAspileLysTyrAsnGluLysPheLysGlyLysAlaThrLeuThrAlaAspLys
`
`350
`330
`310
`TCCTCCAGCACTGCCTACATGCAGCTCAACAGCCTGACATCTGAGGATTCTGCAGTGTAT
`SerSerSerThrAlaTyrMetGlnLeuAsnserLeuThrSerGluAspSerAlaValTyr
`
`"
`410
`390
`370
`TTCTGTAAAAGATCGTACTACGGCCACTGGGGCCAAGGCACCACTCTCACAGTCTCCTCA
`PheCysLysArgSerTyrTyrGlyHisTrpGlyGlnG1yThrThrLeuThrValSerSer
`
`B
`
`50
`30
`10
`ATCACACACACACACATGAGTGTGCCCACTCAGGTCCTGGGGTTGCTGCTGCTGTGGCTT
`MetSerValPro'l'hrGlnValteuGlyLeuLeuLeuteuTrpLeu
`
`ACAGATGC~1GATG~ACATCCAGATGA~~CAGTCTCCAGCCTCCCT*~gTGTATCTGTG
`ThrAspAlaAr(]cysAspileGlnMetThrGlnSerProAlaSerteuSerValSerVal
`
`170
`150
`130
`GGAGAAACTGTCACCATCACATGTCGAGCAAGTGAGAATATTTACAGTAATTTAGCATGG
`GlyGluThrValThrileThrCysArqAlaSerGluAsnileTyrserAsnteuAlaTrp
`
`230
`210
`190
`TATCAACAGAAACAGGGAAAA TCTCCTCAGCTCCTGGTCTATGCTGCAACAAACTTAGCA
`TyrGlnGlnLysGlnGlyLysSerProGlnLeuLeuValTyrAlaAlaThrAsnLeuAla
`uo
`no
`no
`GATGGTGTGCCATCAAGGTTCAGTGGCAGTGGATCGGGCACACAGTATTCCCTCAAGATC
`AspGlyValProSerArgPheSerGlySerGlySerGlyThrGlnTyrSerLeuLysile
`
`350
`330
`310
`AACAGCCTGCAGTCTGAAGATTTTGGGAGTTATTACTGTCAACATTTTTGGGGTACTCCG
`AsnSerLeuGlnSerGluAspPheGlySerTyrTyrCysGlnHisPheTrpGlyThrPro
`
`,.
`410
`390
`370
`TACACGTTCGGAGGGGGGACCAGGCTGGAAATAAAACGGGCTGATGCTGCACCAACTGTC
`TyrThrPheGlyGlyGlyThrArgLeuGluileLysArgAlaAspAlaAlaProThrVal
`
`PFIZER EX. 1182
`Page 1
`
`

`

`-.,.
`
`•
`
`FOR THE PURPOSES OF INFORMATION ONLY
`
`Codes used to identifY States party to the PCT on the front pages ofpamphlets publishing international appli(cid:173)
`cations under the PCT.
`
`AT Austria
`AU Australia
`BB; Barbados
`BE.. Belgium
`Bfi, Bulgaria
`BJ Benin
`BR Brazil
`CF Central African Republic
`CG, Congo
`CH Switzerland
`CM Cameroon
`DE Germany, Federal Republic of
`DK Denmark
`FI
`Finland
`
`France
`FR
`GA Gabon
`GB United Kingdom
`HU Hungary
`IT
`Italy
`Japan
`JP
`KP Democratic People's Republic
`of Korea
`KR Republic of Korea
`U
`Liechtenstein
`LK Sri Lanka
`LU Luxembourg
`M€ Monaco
`MG Madagascar
`
`ML Mali
`MR Mauritania
`MW Malawi
`NL Netherlands
`NO Norway
`RO Romania
`SD Sudan
`SE Sweden
`SN Senegal
`SU Soviet Union
`TD Chad
`TG Togo
`US United States of America
`
`PFIZER EX. 1182
`Page 2
`
`

`

`PCTJGB88f00731
`
`RECOMBINANT ANTIBODY AND METHOD'
`The present invention relates to a humanised
`antibody molecule (HAM) having specificity for an,
`antigen present on certain malignant cells and to a
`process for its production using recombinant DNA
`technology.
`In the present application, the term
`"recombinant antibody molecule" (RAM) is used to
`describe an antibody produced by any process
`involving the use of recombinant DNA technology,
`including any analogues of natural immunoglobulins or
`their fragments. The term "humanised antibody
`molecule" (HAM) is used to describe a molecule having
`an antigen binding site derived from an
`immunoglobulin from a non-human species, the
`remaining immunoglobulin-derived parts of the
`molecule being derived from a human immunoglobulin.
`The antigen binding site may comprise either complete
`variable domains fused onto constant domains or only
`the complementarity determining regions grafted onto
`appropriate framework regions in the variable
`domains. The abbreviation "MAb" is used to indicate
`a monoclonal antibody.
`In the description, reference is made to a_
`number of publications by number. The publications
`are listed in numerical order at the end of the
`description.
`Natural immunoglobulins have been known for
`many years, as have the various fragments thereof,
`such as the Fab, (Fab' )2
`and Fe fragments, which
`can be derived by enzymatic cleavage. Natural
`immunoglobulins comprise a generally Y-shaped
`molecule having an antigen-binding site at the end of
`
`PFIZER EX. 1182
`Page 3
`
`

`

`W089f01783
`
`PCTJGB88f00731
`
`- 2
`
`each upper arm. The remainder of the structure, and
`particularly the stem of the Y, mediates the effector
`functions associated with immunoglobulins.
`Natural immunoglobulins have been used in
`assay, diagnosis and, to a more limited extent,
`therapy. However, such uses, especially in therapy,
`have been hindered by the polyclonal nature of
`natural immunoglobulins. A significant step towards
`the realisation of the potential of immunoglobulins
`as therapeutic agents was the discovery of monoclonal
`antibodies of defined specificity (1). However, most
`MAbs are produced by fusions of rodent spleen cells
`with rodent myeloma cells. They are therefore
`essentially rodent proteins. There are very few
`reports of the production of human MAbs.
`Since most available MAbs are of rodent origin,
`they are naturally antigenic in humans. Therefore,
`the use of rodent MAbs as therapeutic agents in
`humans is inherently limited by the fact that the
`human subject will mount an immunological response to
`the MAb and will either remove it entirely or at
`least reduce its effectiveness.
`There have therefore been made proposals for
`making non-human MAbs less antigenic in humans. Such
`techniques can be generically termed "humanizing"
`MAbs. These techniques generally involve the use of
`recombinant DNA technology to manipulate DNA
`sequences encoding the polypeptide chains of the
`antibody molecule.
`Some early methods for carrying out such a
`procedure are described in EP-A-0 171 496 (Res. Dev.
`Corp. Japan), EP-A-0 173 494 (Stanford University),
`EP-A-0 194 276 (Celltech Limited) and WO-A-8 702 671
`(Int. Gen. Eng. Inc.). The Celltech application
`discloses a proces~ for preparing an
`
`PFIZER EX. 1182
`Page 4
`
`

`

`PCT /GB88f00731
`
`- 3
`
`antibody molecule having the variable domains from a
`mouse MAb and the constant domains from a human
`immunoglobulin.
`It also shows the production of an
`antibody molecule comprising the variable domains of
`the CHl and CL domains of a human
`a mouse MAb 1
`immunoglobulin/ and a non-immunoglobulin-derived
`protein in place of the Fe portion of the human
`immunoglobulin.
`In an alternative approach 1 described in
`the complementarity
`EP-A-87302620.7 (Winter) 1
`determining regions (CDRs) of a mouse MAb have been
`grafted onto the framework regions of the variable
`domains of a human immunoglobulin using site directed
`mutagenesis using long oligonucleotides .
`The earliest work on humanizing MAbs has been
`carried out based on MAbs recognising synthetic
`antigens, such as the NP or NIP antigens. However/
`examples in which a mouse MAb recognising lysozyme
`and a rat MAb recognising an antigen on human T cells
`respectively were humanized are shown by Verhoeyen et
`al. (2) and Reichmann et al. (3)
`.
`It has been widely suggested that
`immunoglobulins, and in particular MAbsr could
`potentially be very useful in the diagnosis and
`treatment of cancer (4 1 5). There has therefore been
`much activity in trying to produce immunoglobulins or
`MAbs directed against tumour-specific antigens. So
`far 1 over one hundred MAbs directed against a variety
`of human carcinomas have been used in various aspects
`of tumour diagnosis or treatment (6).
`There have been a number of papers published
`concerning the production of chimeric monoclonal
`antibodies recognising cell surface antigens. For
`instance, Sahagan et al. (7) disclose a genetically
`enginee~ed murine/human chimeric antibody which
`
`PFIZER EX. 1182
`Page 5
`
`

`

`WOfW[fJ1783
`
`PCTJGB88f00731
`
`- 4
`
`retains specificity for a human tumour-associated
`antigen. Also Nishimura et al. (8) disclose a
`recombinant murine/human chimeric monoclonal antibody
`specific for common acute lymphocytic leukemia
`antigen.
`According to the present invention/ there is
`provided a humanised antibody molecule (HAM) having
`specificity for the TAG-72 antigen and having an
`antigen binding site wherein at least the
`complementarity determining regions (CDRs) of the
`variable domain are derived from the mouse monoclonal
`antibody B72.3 (B72.3 MAb) and the remaining
`immunoglobulin-derived parts of the HAM are derived
`from a human immunoglobulin.
`The variable domains of the HAM may comprise
`either the entire variable domains of the B72.3 MAb
`or may comprise the framework regions of a human
`variable domain having grafted thereon the CDRs of
`the B72.3 MAb.
`The B72.3 MAb is a mouse MAb of the type
`IgG1-Kappa raised against a membrane-enriched extract
`of a human liver metastatis of a breast carcinoma
`(9). The B72.3 MAb has been extensively studied in a
`number of laboratories. It has been shown to
`recognise a tumour-associated glycoprotein TAG-72 1 a
`mucin-like molecule with a molecular weight of
`approximately 106
`(10).
`Immunohistochemical
`studies have demonstrated that the B72.3 MAb
`recognises approximately 90% of colorectal
`carcinomas/ 85% of breast carcinomas and 95% of
`ovarian carcinomas. Howeverr it shows no significant
`cross-reactivity with a wide spectrum of normal human
`tissues (11 to 14).
`It has surprisingly been found that humanizing
`the B72.3 MAb does not adversely affect its binding
`
`PFIZER EX. 1182
`Page 6
`
`

`

`WCl\89'/~1783
`
`PCT /GBSS/00731
`
`-
`
`5
`
`activity, and this produces a HAM which is extremely
`usefu~ in both therapy and diagnosis of certain
`carcinomas.
`Preferably, the HAM of the present invention
`will be produced by recombinant DNA technology.
`The HAM of the present invention may comprise:
`a complete antibody molecule, having full length
`heavy and light chains; a fragment thereof, such as
`the Fab or (Fab')z
`fragment;
`a light chain or heavy
`chain dimer; or any other molecule with the same
`specificity as the B72.3 antibody.
`Alternatively, the HAM of the present invention
`may have attached to it an effector or reporter
`molecule. For instance, the HAM may have a
`macrocycle, for chelating a heavy metal atom, or a
`toxin, such ai ricin, attac~ed to it by a covalent
`bridging structure. Alternatively, the procedures of
`recombinant DNA technology may be used to produce a
`HAM in which the Fe fragment or CH3 domain of a
`complete antibody molecule has been replaced by an
`enzyme or toxin molecule.
`The remainder of the HAM may be derived from
`any suitable human immunoglobulin. However, it need
`not comprise only protein sequences from the human
`immunoglobulin. For instance, a gene may be
`constructed in which a DNA sequence _encoding part of
`a human immunoglobulin chain is fused to a DNA
`sequence encoding the amino acid sequence of a
`polypeptide effector or reporter molecule.
`According to a second aspect of the present
`invention, there is provided a process for producing
`the HAM of the first aspect of the invention, which
`process comprises:
`(a) producing in an expression vector an operon
`having a DNA sequence which encodes an antibody heavy
`
`.·
`
`PFIZER EX. 1182
`Page 7
`
`

`

`W089[01783
`
`PCT[GB88f00731
`
`t
`
`-
`
`6
`
`or light chain wherein at least the CDRs of the
`variable domain are derived from the B72.3 MAb and
`the remaining immunoglobulin-derived parts of the
`antibody chain are derived from a human
`immunoglobulin;
`(b) producing in an expression vector an
`operon having a DNA sequence which encodes a
`complementary antibody light or heavy chain wherein
`at least the CDRs of the variable domain are derived
`from the B72.3 MAb and the remaining
`immunoglobulin-derived parts of the antibody chain
`are derived from a human immunoglobulin;
`(c) transfecting a host cell with the or each
`vectori and
`(d) culturing the transfected cell line to
`pr9duce the HAM.
`The cell line may be transfected with two
`vectors, the first vector containing an operon
`encoding a light chain-derived polypeptide and the
`second vector- containing an operon encodi-ng ~a. heavy
`chain-derived polypeptide. Preferably, the vectors
`are identical except in so far as the coding
`sequences and selectable markers are concerned so as
`to ensure as far as possible that each polypeptide
`chain is equally expressed.
`Alte~natively, a single vector may be used, the
`vector including the sequences encoding both light
`chain- and heavy chain-derived polypeptides.
`The DNA in the coding sequences for the light
`and heavy chains may comprise eDNA or genomic DNA or
`both. However, it is preferred that the DNA sequence
`encoding the heavy or light chain comprises at least
`partially genomic DNA. Most preferably, the heavy or
`light chain encoding sequence comprises a fusion of
`eDNA and genomic DNA.
`
`PFIZER EX. 1182
`Page 8
`
`

`

`wo 89/01783
`
`PCT/GB88f00731
`
`- 7
`
`The host cell used to express the HAM of the
`present invention is preferably a eukaryotic cell,
`most preferably a mammalian cell, such as a CHO cell
`or a myeloid cell. It has been found, surprisingly,
`that the use of eDNA/genomic DNA fusions for the
`heavy or light chain coding sequences leads to
`enhanced production of the HAM of the present
`invention in non-myeloid mammalian cells. Thus, an
`important aspect of the invention is the use of such
`fusions in non-myeloid mammalian cells in order to
`express the HAM.
`The present invention also includes cloning and
`expression vectors and transfected cell lines used in
`the process of the invention, therapeutic and
`diagnostic compositions containing the HAM of the
`invention and uses of such compositions in therapy
`and diagnosis.
`The general methods by which the vectors may be
`constructed, transfection methods and culture me~hods
`are well known per se and form no part of the
`invention. Such methods are shown, for instance, in
`references 15 and 16.
`The present invention is now described, by way
`of example only, with reference to the accompanying
`drawings, in which:-
`Figure 1 shows the DNA sequences encoding the
`unprocessed variable regions of the B72.3 MAb
`obtained by sequencing the eDNA clones pBH41 and
`pBL52. Panel A shows the sequence coding for the VH
`region and the predicted amino acid sequence. Panel
`B shows the sequence coding for the VL region and the
`first 21 residues of the CL region, together with the
`predicted amino acid sequence. The points of fusion
`with the human C regions are indicated with arrows.
`
`.-
`
`PFIZER EX. 1182
`Page 9
`
`

`

`WO'S!'Jft1783
`
`PCTJGB88f00731
`
`-l
`
`- 8
`
`The putative sites of cleavage of the signal peptide
`are indicated by open triangles. The numbers refer
`to the nucleotides in th_e original eDNA clones;
`Figure 2 is a schematic diagram of the
`construction by site directed mutagenesis,
`restriction and ligation of the chimaeric heavy chain
`gene;
`
`Figure 3 is a schematic diagram of the
`construction by partial restriction and ligation of
`the chimaeric light chain gene;
`(In Figures 2 and 3, coding sequences are shown
`as boxes, dark for the variable regions and light for
`the constant regions. Restriction enzymes are
`abbreviated as follows: EcoRI=E; Bglii=B; Hindiii=H;
`Mboii=M; Hpai=Hp; and Scai=Sc. Dotted lines indicate
`the continuation of the sequence into vector or
`constant region DNA.)
`Figure 4 is a schematic diagram of the hCMV
`expression vector and the four alternative eDNA or
`gene constructs inserted into the EcoRI site. The
`chimaeric heavy chain gene was inserted using a
`BamHI-EcoRI oligonucleotide adapter. Coding
`sequences are represented by boxes, dark for the
`variable regions and light for the constant regions.
`The direction of transcription is indicated with an
`arrow;
`Figure 5 shows an ELISA analysis of COS-cell
`transfectant supernatants. The level of
`antigen-binding capacity in the supernatant of
`COS-cell transfectants was analysed as described
`later. Dilution curves were plotted out against the
`optical density of the colour change. Different
`antibodies were used to recognise mouse or human
`epitopes, and consequently the antigen-binding levels
`for each curve are not strictly comparable. Each
`
`PFIZER EX. 1182
`Page 10
`
`

`

`W089/01783
`
`PCT /GB88f00731
`
`- 9
`
`curve represents a co-transfection, as follows:
`A mouse heavy chain, mouse light chain; .A mouse
`heavy chain, chimaeric light chain; CJ chimaeric heavy
`chain, mouse light chain; . . chimaeric heavy chain,
`chimaeric light chain;
`Figure 6 shows SDS-PAGE analysis in a reducing
`gel of immunoprecipitations from the supernatants of
`transfected COS-cells. The DNA used for the
`transfection was as follows: Lane 1, mouse light
`chain alone; Lane 2, mouse light chain, mouse heavy
`chain; Lane 3, mouse light chain, chimaeric heavy
`chain; Lane 4, chimaeric light chain alone; Lane 5,
`chimaeric light chain, mouse heavy chain; and Lane 6,
`chimaeric light chain, chimaeric heavy chain. The
`antibodies used for the immunoprecipitations were:
`Lanes 1-3, rabbit anti"':'mouse F(ab' )z
`; Lanes 4-6,
`rabbit anti-human F(ab' )2
`Figure 7 shows SDS-PAGE analysis of
`immunoprecipitations from the supernatants of
`transfected cos-cells, under non-reducing (lanes
`1-3), and reducing (lanes 4-6) conditions. The DNA
`used for transfection was as follows:
`lanes 1 and 4,
`chimaeric light chain clone; lanes 2 and 5, chimaeric
`light chain, mouse heavy chain; lanes 3 and 6,
`chimaeric light chain, chimaeric heavy chain. The
`antibody used for the immunoprecipitation in each
`case was rabbit anti-human F(ab' )z
`Figure 8 shows SDS-PAGE analysis on a reducing
`gel of immunoprecipitations from the supernatants of
`transfected cos-cells, grown and labelled in the
`absence (lanes 1 and 3), and the presence (lanes 2
`and 4) of tunicamycin. The DNA used for the
`transfections was as follows:
`lanes 1 and 2,
`chimaeric light chain clone; and lanes 3 and 4,
`chimaeric light chain and chimaeric heavy chain. The
`
`PFIZER EX. 1182
`Page 11
`
`

`

`W089J01783
`
`PCf/GB88f00731
`
`- 10 -
`
`antibody used for immunoprecipitation in each case
`was rabbit anti-human F(ab')z
`Figure 9 shows reducing and non-reducing
`SDS-PAGE gels of chimeric B72.3 produced by CHO cells;
`Figure 10 shows a two dimensional SDS-PAGE gel
`of chimaeric B72.3 produced by CHO cells;
`Figure 11 shows a time course study of tumour
`labelling using B72.3 antibodies;
`Figure 12 shows the tissue/tumour ratio of the
`B72.3 antibodies; and
`Figure 13 shows the construction of plasmid
`
`TR002
`
`EXAMPLE 1
`
`Molecular cloning and seguencing of the B72.3 heavy
`and light chain cDNAs.
`
`Polyadenylated RNA was isolated from the B72.3
`hybridoma cell line using the guanidinium
`isothiocyanate/caesium chloride method (15). Double
`stranded eDNA was synthesised (17) and a eDNA library
`was constructed in bacteriophage ~ gt 10 vector
`using EcoRI linkers (18). Two screening probes were
`synthesised, complementary to mouse immunoglobulin
`heavy and light chain constant regions. The heavy
`chain probe was a 19 mer complementary to residues
`~ 1 sequence
`115-133 in the CH1 domain of the mouse
`(19). The light chain probe was a 20 mer
`complementary to residues 4658-4677 of the genomic
`mouse CK sequence (20). The probes were
`
`radio-labelled at the 5' terminus with [ C 3 Zp]
`
`ATP
`
`using T4 polynucleotide kinase (Amersham
`International) and used to screen the eDNA library.
`Clones which contained the complete leader,
`variable and constant regions of both the heavy and
`
`PFIZER EX. 1182
`Page 12
`
`

`

`WG89'Ltlt783
`
`PCT/GBSS/00731
`
`- 11 -
`
`light chains were isolated. The EcoRI eDNA inserts
`were subcloned into M13mp8 vectors for sequencing
`(21), generating a heavy chain clone, designated
`:
`- pBH41, and a light chain clone, designated pBL52.
`Nucleotide sequence analysis was carried out
`according to the chain termination procedure (22).
`The 980 base pair EcoRI insert in pBL52 was
`fully sequenced (22). The EcoRI insert in pBH41 was
`shown to comprise approximately 1700 base pairs by
`agarose gel electrophoresis. The variable domain and
`the 5' region of the CHl domain were sequenced, as
`was the 3' end of the clone to confirm the presence
`of the correct mouse C, 1 termination sequences. The
`DNA and predicted amino acid sequences for the
`unprocessed variable regions of pBH41 and pBL52 are
`shown in Figure 1. Examination of the derived amino
`acid sequence revealed considerable homology with
`other characterised immunoglobulin genes, and enabled
`the extent of the leader, variable and constant
`domains to be accurately determined.
`In addition,
`MAb B72"3 was confirmed to be an IgG1 K antibody, as
`previously reported (9).
`
`Construction of the Chimaeric Mouse-Human Heavy Chain
`Clone
`
`A genomic clone containing sequences coding for
`the human C 0 4 region was isolated as a Hindi II
`fragment from the cosmid COS Ig8 (23) and then cloned
`via pAT153 into M13tg130 as an EcoRI-BamHI fragment
`to form pJA78. Following DNA sequence analysis, an
`18 mer oligonucleotide was synthesised and site
`specific mutagenesis was performed to convert a C
`residue to an A residue, thereby generating a novel
`Hindiii site at the start of the CH1 exon, to yield
`pJA91.
`
`PFIZER EX. 1182
`Page 13
`
`

`

`W089J01783
`
`PCT/GB88f00731
`
`- 12 -
`
`Site directed mutagenesis was performed (24)
`using EcoRI- and Bgli-cut M13mp18 to generate a
`gapped duplex with the relevant phage template. DNA
`was transformed into E. coli HB2154 and resultant
`transformants were propagated on E. coli HB2151
`(Anglian Biotechnology Ltd) as described in the
`protocols provided. All mutations were sequenced
`using the chain termination procedure (22). All
`sequenced fragments were subsequently recloned into
`other vectors in order to exclude the possibility of
`secondary mutations which may have occurred during
`the mutagenesis procedure.
`The VH domain from the B72.3 heavy chain eDNA,
`cloned in M13mp9 as pBH41, was isolated as an
`EcoRI-Bgli fragment and introduced into the
`EcoRI-Hindiii sites of pJA91 in conjunction with a 32
`base pair Bgli-Hindiii adaptor to yield pJA93. The
`product was therefore a chimaeric immunoglobulin
`heavy chain gene containing a variable region derived
`from a mouse eDNA clone fused to a sequence,
`comprising the CHl, H, CH2 and CH3 domains separated
`by introns, derived from a human genomic clone. The
`accuracy of the variable/constant region junction was
`confirmed by nucleotide sequence analysis. A
`schematic diagram of details of the construction is
`given in Figure 2. The Q 4 constant region was
`selected as it possesses a limited repertoire of
`effector functions, but does bind to staphylococcal
`protein A, a potentially useful reagent for
`purification.
`
`Construction of the Chimaeric Mouse-Human Light Chain
`Gene
`
`The mouse light chain eDNA clone, pBL52,
`contains a cutting site for Mboii 18 base pairs
`
`PFIZER EX. 1182
`Page 14
`
`

`

`W0¥89{01783.
`
`PCT /GBSS/00731
`
`- 1'3 -
`
`downstream from the junction of the variable and
`constant domains. Due to sequence homology between
`the mouse and human CK genes, an identical cutting
`site exists in the latter gene (25) and use of this
`site provides a method of fusing the mouse variable
`and human constant domains. Partial digestion of the
`EcoRI fragment containing the mouse eDNA clone with
`Mboii generated a 416 base pair EcoRI-Mboii fragment
`with a single residue overhang. A genomic clone,
`comprising an M13-derived vector containing the human
`C-kappa gene on a Psti-Hindiii fragment was digested
`with Foki. A 395 base pair fragment containing the
`majority of C-kappa was cloned into pAT153 using
`EcoRI linkers to form pNW200. Digestion of a 945
`base pair Scai-Hindiii fragment from pNW200 with
`Mboii generated a 374 base pair Mboii-Hindiii
`fragment, which could anneal with and be ligated to
`the 416 base .pair EcoRI-Mboii fragment described
`above. The two fragments were ligated into a pSP64
`vector linearised with EcoRI and Hindiii, and used to
`transform competent E. coli HB101. The
`variable/constant region junction was sequenced in
`order to confirm the correct fusion. The
`construction is outlined schematically in Figure 3.
`
`Construction of Expression Vectors for Transient
`Expression in COS Cells
`
`The heavy and light chain chimaeric genes, as
`well as the mouse heavy and light chain eDNA clones,
`were inserted separately into the unique EcoRI site
`of plasmid pEE6 (27). The light chain encoding
`plasmid was designated EE6.cL.neo. For the chimaeric
`heavy chain, this was accomplished by using an
`oligonucleotide adapter to change the 3' BamHI site
`
`PFIZER EX. 1182
`Page 15
`
`

`

`W089J01783
`
`PCT [GB88[00731
`
`- 14 -
`
`to an EcoRI site to give an EcoRI fragment for
`cloning. The heavy chain encoding plasmid was
`designated EE6.cH.gpt. This plasmi_d contains the
`strong promoter/enhancer and tran~criptional control
`element from the human cytomegalovirus (hCMV)
`inserted into a unique Hindiii site upstream of the
`EcoRI site.
`In addition, an SV40 origin of
`replication site is provided by the SV40 early
`promoter which drives a selectable marker gene,
`either a neomycin-resistance gene (nee) for light
`chain genes or a guanine phosphoribosyl transferase
`gene (gpt) for heavy chain genes, inserted into a
`unique BamHI site. The plasmid also contains an
`ampicillin-resistance gene allowing selection and
`propagation in bacterial hosts. The structures of
`the expression vector and immunoglobulin gene inserts
`are shown schematically in Figure 4.
`
`Transfections and ELISA Analysis of Antibody
`Production
`
`The four expression constructs described above
`were used singly or in heavy/light chain gene pairs
`to transfect COS-1 cells {26). The cells were left
`to incubate in DNA-DEAE dextran solution for six
`hours, then shocked for two minutes with 10% DMSO in
`HEPES-buffered saline. The cells were washed and
`incubated in medium containing 10% foetal calf serum
`for 72 hours.
`for 72 hours the
`Following incubation at 37°C
`cell supernatants and lysates were analysed by ELISA
`for heavy and light chain production and binding of
`antigen.
`cells) was removed
`The medium (500 Ml per 10 5
`for ELISA analysis. Cell lysates were prepared by
`
`PFIZER EX. 1182
`Page 16
`
`

`

`W0'89/01783
`
`PCT/GBSS/00731
`
`- 15 -
`
`cells in 500 ~1 1% Triton X-100, 0.5%
`lysis of 10s
`deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 0.01M sodium phosphate pH
`7.5, 0.1M sodium chloride and 0.001M EDTA. Lysates
`and conditioned medium were centrifuged for 5 minutes
`in an Eppendorf centrifuge to remove nuclei and cell
`debris, and stored at 4°C
`before analysis.
`Microtitre plates were coated with 0.25 ~g per
`well of sheep or goat antibody reactive against
`either human or mouse specific epitopes on the heavy
`or light chains. Supernatants or lysates from
`transfected cos cells were diluted 1:2 or 1:4
`respectively in sample conjugate buffer containing
`O.lM Tris-HCl pH 7.0, O.lM sodium chloride, 0.02%
`Tween 20 and 0.2% casein.
`100 ~1 of each diluted
`sample were added to each well and incubated for 1
`hour at room temperature with gentle agitation.
`Following washing six times with wash buffer
`(phosphate buffered saline containing 0.2% Tween 20 1
`pH 7.2), 100 ~1 of 1:5000 dilution of standard
`horseradish peroxidase - conjugated antibody reactive
`against either human or mouse specific epitopes were
`added per well. The plates were incubated for 1 hour
`at room temperature/ and then washed six times with
`wash buffer. 100 ~1 of substrate buffer containing
`0.1 mg/ml tetramethylbenzidine (TMB), 0.1M sodium
`were added to
`citrate, pH 6.0 and 0.005% H202
`ea~h well to generate a colour change. The reaction
`was terminated after 2-3 minutes by adjusting the
`solution to pH 1.0 with 1.5M sulphuric acid. The
`optical density was determined at 450nm for each well
`by measurement in a Dynatech laboratories MR600
`microplate reader. Standard curves were generated
`using known concentrations of the appropriate human
`or mouse immunoglobulins.
`
`PFIZER EX. 1182
`Page 17
`
`

`

`W089/01783:
`
`PCT /GB88f00731
`
`- 16 -
`
`Antigen binding assays were performed in an
`analogous manner. Microtitre plates were coated with
`0~25 ~g per well of purified TAG-72 antigen (6)
`obtained from human patients or from tumour
`xenografts implanted in nude mice (both gifts of J.
`Schlomr NCI). Following washing six times in wash
`buffer, samples from cos-cell transfections were
`added as previously/ and the same subsequent
`procedures carried out, using goat anti-mouse or
`human F(abr)2
`linked to HRP as the second antibody.
`A number of assay systems using different
`capture antibodies were developed and
`cross-correlated to investigate the potential
`products of each transfection.
`In all cases, mouse
`light chain and chimaeric light chain were detected
`in the supernatants and lysates of appropriately
`transfected cells. However heavy chains were only
`detected in the supernatants when co-transfected with
`light chain. A low level of heavy chain was detected
`in the cell lysate in each case, supporting a
`suggestion of inhibition of heavy chain secretion in
`the absence of light chain.
`Assembly assays, which detect the presence of
`associated polypeptide chains, demonstrated the
`formation of multimers containing at least one heavy
`and one light chain when both genes were
`co-transfected. Mouse genes and chimaeric genes
`·appeared equally capable of assembly and formation of
`hybrid molecules.
`Antigen binding analysis (see above)
`demonstrated that the mouse heavy and light chain
`co-transfections generated an antibody molecule
`capable of recognising antigen. Replacement of the
`mouse gene for either chain with the appropriate
`chimaeric gene led to the production of a hybrid
`
`PFIZER EX. 1182
`Page 18
`
`

`

`WOD/9'1783
`
`PCTJGB88f00731
`
`- 17 -
`
`molecule with antigen binding specificity in the
`ELISA assays. Finally, transfection of the COS cells
`with both the chimaeric heavy and light chain genes
`generated a complete chimaeric antibody molecule with
`antigen binding specificity. The ELISA data from one
`experiment are presented in Figure 5. These
`experiments demonstrate that 11 humanisation" of the
`antibody molecule does not have a significant effect
`on its antigen recognition capability.
`
`ImmunopreciPitation of Antibody Molecules from
`Biosynthetically Labelled COS-Cell Transfectants
`
`Preliminary experiments suggested that there
`was little expression from the transfected DNA in the
`initial 24 hours.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket