throbber
soY.
`tJA
`11~ I DISPLAY
`
`JANUARY 1984
`VOLUME 81
`NUMBER 1
`
`LIBRARY
`t: E.B
`1qR4
`u~WERSIT'f OF
`l~l c;'lll lr,Tf\1\l
`
`. ! .
`
`..... .
`"-
`
`Proceedings
`
`OF THE
`
`National Acaden1y
`of Sciences
`
`OF THE UNITED STATES ()F AMERICA
`
`BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
`
`PFIZER EX. 1104
`Page 1
`
`

`

`Proceedings
`OF THE
`National Academy
`of Sciences
`OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
`
`Officers
`of the
`Academy
`
`Editorial Board
`of the
`Proceedings
`
`FRANK PRESS, President
`JAMES D. EBERT, Vice President
`BRYCE CRAWFORD, JR., Home Secretary
`WALTER A . ROSENBLITH, Foreign Secretary
`ELKAN R. BLOUT, Treasurer
`
`ROBERT A . ALBERTY
`K . FRANK AUSTEN
`PAUL BERG
`JOHN R . BORCHERT
`JOHN E. DOWLING
`
`DANIEL E . KOSHLAND , JR., Chairman
`PETER D . LAX
`ROBERT E . MARSHAK
`PETER H . RAVEN
`JOHN RODGERS
`NEVIN S . SCRIMSHAW
`
`J. EDWIN SEEGMILLER
`ROBERT L. SINSHEIMER
`CHARLES H. TOWNES
`FRANK H. WESTHEIMER
`JAMES B. WYNGAARDEN
`
`Managing Editor: FRANCES R. ZWANZIG
`Senior Associate Editor: GARY T . COCKS
`Associate Editor: CAY BUTLER
`Associate Editor: TERRY W . PEARSON
`Associate Editor: DOROTHY P. SMITH
`Assistant Managing Editor: JOANNE D'AMICO
`
`Senior Copy Editor: LYNN A. BROWN
`Copy Editors: BARBARA A. BACON , MARYANNE CUNNINGHAM-AGNEW, RUTH E. ESCH,
`P . J. GROFF, JANET L. OVERTON , ERIC R . WASSYNG
`Administrative Assistants: DELORES BANKS, JACQUELINE BODE, BEULAH EDWARDS ,
`CYNDY MATHEWS
`Circulation : JULIA LITTLE, VIRGINIA TREADWAY
`
`Editorial correspondence: PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 2101 Constitution Avenue, Washing(cid:173)
`ton, DC 20418.
`
`Business correspondence: Circulation Office of the PROCEEDINGS , National Academy of Sciences, 2101 Constitution Ave(cid:173)
`nue, Washington, DC 20418 .
`
`Information for Contributors : See issue Number 1, January 1984.
`
`Copyright: The National Academy of Sciences has copyrighted this journal as a collective work and does not own copy(cid:173)
`rights for individual articles. Requests for permission to reproduce parts of individual articles or for reprints of individual
`articles should be addressed to the authors . Microforms of complete volumes are available to regular subscribers only and
`may be obtained from University Microfilms , Xerox Corporation , Ann Arbor, MI 48103.
`
`Subscriptions: All correspondence concerning subscriptions should be addressed to the Circulation Office of the PROCEED(cid:173)
`INGS. Subscriptions are entered on a calendar year basis only. For 1984, subscription rates are $185 in the United States and
`$220 elsewhere. Subscribers are requested to notify the Circulation Office of the PROCEEDINGS 6 weeks in advance of any
`change of address ; also the local postmaster. The Academy is not responsible for nonreceipt of issues because of an
`improper address unless a change of address is on file. The notice of address change should list both the old and new
`addresses . Claims for replacement copies will not be honored more than 60 days after the issue date for domestic subscrib(cid:173)
`ers and not more than 90 days after the issue date for foreign subscribers.
`
`: .. '
`
`Back Issues: Volumes 76-81 , January 1979 and thereafter, are available from the Circulation Office of the PRocEEDINGS .
`The price of a single issue is $21.00 for Volumes 76-78 or $11.00 for Volumes 79-81.
`
`Second class postage paid at Washington, DC, and at additional mailing offices.
`
`PRINTED IN THE USA
`
`PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (ISSN-0027-8424) is pub(cid:173)
`lished semimonthly by THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 2101 Constitution Avenue, Washington , DC 20418.
`
`© 1984 by THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
`
`POSTMASTER: Send address changes to: PROCEEDINGS, 2101 Constitution Ave., Washington, DC 20418.
`
`PFIZER EX. 1104
`Page 2
`
`

`

`Proc. Nat/ . Acad. Sci . USA
`Vol. 81 , pp . 216-219, January 1984
`Immunology
`
`Human anti-idiotype antibodies in cancer patients: Is the
`modulation of the immune response beneficial for the patient?
`
`(internal image of antigen/gastrointestinal cancer/monoclonal antibody)
`
`HILARY KoPROWSKI *, DoROTH EE HERL YN*, MICHAEL LuBECK *, ELAINE DEFREITAs*, AND HENRY F. S EARst
`
`*The Wistar Institute, 36th and Spruce Streets, Philadelphia, PA 19104; and tAmerican Oncologic Hospital , Fox Chase Cancer Center, Central and Shell mire
`Avenues, Philadelphia, PA 19111
`
`Communicated by John R . Brobeck , August31, 1983
`
`Inoculation of human subjects with mouse
`ABSTRACT
`monoclonal antibody results in the production of anti-idiotype
`antibody that reacts with the binding site of the monoclonal
`antibody. This reaction is hapten-inhibited, suggesting that an
`internal image of the antigen is produced by the anti-idiotype
`response. The anti-idiotype antibody isolated from sera of
`three patients showed significant crossreactivity. Patients who
`developed the anti-idiotype antibody improved clinically and
`had long remission from their disease. The possible presence of
`the internal image of cancer antigen on the human immuno(cid:173)
`globulin molecule may change the conditions under which the
`immune system reacts to the tumor antigen and may open new
`approaches to the control of tumor growth.
`
`The treatment of human leukemias with mouse monoclonal
`antibody (mAb) directed against antigen(s) present on leuke(cid:173)
`mia cells results in a transient destruction of the leukemia
`cells (1), observed almost immediately after administration
`of the mAb (2). Sera of some patients who received anti-Leu
`1 mAb for treatment ofT-cell leukemia inhibited binding of
`fluoresceinated mAb to T leukemia cells and were consid(cid:173)
`ered to contain an anti-idiotype (anti-Id) antibody. This was
`also observed in sera of renal transplant patients who re(cid:173)
`ceived an OKT3 anti-T-cell mouse mAb (3). It has been sug(cid:173)
`gested that binding of anti-Id to the mAb may prevent the
`antitumor activity of the mAb (1). This may be true in cases
`when direct action of mAb on cancer cells occurs (2). How(cid:173)
`ever, when no immediate antitumor effect of mAb is ob(cid:173)
`served and when induction of tumor cell destruction occurs
`only a long time after the administration of mAb (4), it may
`be that an immune response of the host to his tumor is in(cid:173)
`duced by mAb treatment.
`Ierne has postulated a network of interacting antibody
`molecules and lymphocytes in the immune system in which
`idiotypes of antibody molecules are recognized by anti-idio(cid:173)
`typic antibodies and cells (5). Within the set of anti-idiotypic
`antibodies could be expected to be those that were directly
`complementary to the parotope-i.e ., the antigen binding
`site of the idiotypic antibody. The binding of such anti-idio(cid:173)
`typic antibodies to the idiotypes has in fact been shown to be
`inhibitable by the antigen . This has led to the concept that
`such anti-idiotypic antibodies are internal images of the anti(cid:173)
`gen. It was therefore predicted that priming an animal with
`anti-Id rather than with an antigen would be possible, and
`this, in fact , has been successfully achieved (6). The first
`physiological evidence that anti-Id could mimic the action of
`an antigen was obtained with anti-Ids against insulin (7). Di(cid:173)
`rect evidence for the beneficial effect of an anti-Id antibody
`in infectious diseases has recently been found in mice primed
`with anti-Id in the absence of antigen that appeared immu(cid:173)
`nized against Trypanosoma rhodesiense after such treatment
`
`(8). When these animals were challenged with T. rhode(cid:173)
`siense, specific idiotype appeared in all animals, some of
`which had the specific idiotype even before challenge.
`In the present paper, we describe the development of anti(cid:173)
`Id in sera of patients with gastrointestinal cancer who were
`treated with mouse mAb. Furthermore , we show that bind(cid:173)
`ing between the anti-Id and mAb can be inhibited by hapten.
`This suggests that the anti-ld is the internal image of the anti(cid:173)
`gen expressed by the cancer cells. Finally, we discuss these
`findings in relation to the outcome of mAb treatment of gas(cid:173)
`trointestinal cancer.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`mAbs. Mouse mAbs 17-1A, C42032, and C41472, which
`bind to human gastrointestinal cancer cells, have been de(cid:173)
`scribed elsewhere (9, 10). mAb C42032 is specific for colo(cid:173)
`rectal carcinoma (CRC)-associated antigen(s) of Mr 180,000,
`160,000, 50,000, and 40,000. mAb C41472 (IgG2a) is specific
`for a CRC-associated antigen of Mr 50,000. The A5C3 mAb
`against hepatitis virus has been described (11) . mAb 17-1A
`(lgG2a, K light chain) and C42032 (lgG2a, K light chain) were
`purified from ascites obtained from hybridoma-bearing mice
`by affinity chromatography on a protein A-Sepharose col(cid:173)
`umn (Pharmacia) as described by Ey et a/. (12).
`Colorectal Cancer Extract. The 3 M KCl extract of SW-
`1222 cells , a cell line derived from colorectal cancer, has
`been described (13). Since this preparation binds mAb 17-
`1A, it seems likely that the material containing the antigen is
`in soluble form.
`Patients. All patients had metastatic or recurrent gastroin(cid:173)
`testinal adenocarcinoma and were injected systemically with
`one dose of a purified sterile pyrogen-free preparation of
`mAb 17-1A (9) concentrated from ascites fluid of BALB/c
`mice (14). Of 9 patients who received 192 mg or less of mAb,
`7 developed anti-mouse globulin antibodies (10). Of 20 pa(cid:173)
`tients who received 200-1,000 mg of mAb, 3 developed anti(cid:173)
`mouse globulin antibodies (10). Sera of 3 patients of the first
`group who developed anti-mouse globulin antibodies (nos.
`07, 08, and 09) (10) and of 2 patients of the second group
`(nos. 14 and 23) were either screened or processed for isola(cid:173)
`tion of anti-ld antibodies. Sera used for isolation of anti-Id
`antibodies from subjects 07, 08, and 23 were obtained at the
`time when all 3 showed the highest concentration of anti(cid:173)
`mouse globulin antibodies (see Fig. 1). Patient 08 received a
`second injection of 130 mg of mAb 20 months after the first
`injection, and serum obtained after this second injection was
`used in a screening test for the presence of anti-Id (Table 1).
`Preparation of Rabbit Anti-ldiotypic Antibodies. New Zea(cid:173)
`land White rabbits were injected subcutaneously at multiple
`sites with 300 p.g of purified mAb 17-lA emulsified in
`Freund's complete adjuvant and , 30 days later, were injected
`intramuscularly with 100 p.g of mAb 17-1A. Sera were col-
`
`The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge
`payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement"
`in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.
`
`Abbreviations: anti-ld, anti-idiotype; mAb , monoclonal antibody;
`CRC, colorectal carcinoma.
`
`216
`-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`
`.....
`
`PFIZER EX. 1104
`Page 3
`
`

`

`Immunology: Koprowski et a/.
`
`Proc. Nat/. Acad. Sci. USA 81 (1984)
`
`217
`
`on day 10 of the secondary response. Antisera were
`on mAb C42032 and on mAb 17-1A immunoadsor-
`as described below .
`Jso11ation of Anti-Idiotypic Antibodies from Human Sera.
`were prepared by coupling purified
`(30 mg each) to 2 ml of Affi-Gel 10 (Bio-Rad). Sera
`obtained from patients injected with one dose of mAb
`(10, 14). Serum samples previously shown by radio-
`11111~'"'a~"UJ to contain anti-murine lgG antibody were se(cid:173)
`adsorbed on mAb C42032 and 17-1A immunoad-
`to remove anti-isotypic and anti-idiotypic antibod(cid:173)
`ly. Adsorbed antibodies were eluted with 0.1
`buffer (pH 2.8), immediately neutralized with
`·-~••h<>rP buffer, and dialyzed against phosphate-buffered
`; the protein was quantitated by absorption at 280 nm
`= 14).
`IOJ•mtJetiitio,n Assay for Detection of Anti-Id. Polystyrene
`in, 6.35 mm) (Precision Plastic Ball, Chicago;
`) were washed three times with 95% ethanol. The
`beads were incubated overnight at 4°C with gentle
`with a dilution of either rabbit or human anti-ld anti-
`in 0.02 M sodium tetraborate (pH 8.2), then washed
`times with phosphate-buffered saline and further incu(cid:173)
`for at least 3 hr at room temperature with phosphate-
`saline/2% bovine serum albumin/ 0.04% NaN 3. The
`were then exposed to 1251-labeled mAb 17-1A as the
`idiotype and incubated with the potential source of
`anti-ld-i.e., human sera diluted to 25% concentra(cid:173)
`in Ca2+ -, Mg2+ -free phosphate-buffered saline/ 2% bo(cid:173)
`serum albumin/ 0.04% NaN 3. After an additional over(cid:173)
`incubation, the beads were washed and the radioactiv-
`was measured in a gamma counter.
`1~tlimulatiion of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells. Peri ph(cid:173)
`blood mononuclear cells were stimulated with F(ab'h
`at 10 ng/ ml of mAb 17-1A in vitro as described
`to activate antigen-specific T cells. During the following
`, aliquots of cells were separated into T- and B-cell
`by rosetting with sheep erythrocytes treated
`2-aminoethylisouronium bromide (16). Both popula(cid:173)
`were stained with F(ab'h fragments of mAb 17-1A or
`mAb and goat anti-mouse fluorescein-conju-
`lg and subsequently analyzed in a cytofluorograph. In
`, peripheral blood mononuclear cells from the same
`were stimulated with F(ab'h fragments of mAb 17-
`or anti-influenza mAb for 9 days in a modified Mishell(cid:173)
`culture for specific human lg production (15). Super(cid:173)
`from these cultures were assayed in a solid-phase
`immunoabsorbent assay for specific human
`(KPL Laboratories, Gaithersburg, MD).
`
`RESULTS
`screen serum samples for the presence ofanti-ld, a com(cid:173)
`assay was performed using rabbit anti-Id and four
`sera previously incubated with 1251-labeled mAb 17-
`The results (Table 1) indicate that the three sera (nos. 23,
`and 14) obtained after one injection of mAb showed in hi(cid:173)
`of binding of mAb 17-1A that was higher than that of
`injection samples. Binding inhibition values ob(cid:173)
`for post-mAb injection serum of patient 14 were low
`compared with those of the other two sera but higher than
`the pre-mAb exposure serum of the same subject. Inhibi(cid:173)
`values for serum obtained from patient 08, 7 days after
`r~>r·pn' '"rl a second injection of mAb were already high .
`crude rapid screening assay with polyclonal rabbit anti(cid:173)
`was followed by isolation and purification of indi(cid:173)
`anti-lds by the immunoadsorbent technique described
`and Methods. Anti-Ids isolated from serum of
`23, who received 750 mg of mAb , and from sera of
`08 and 07, who received 133 and 125 mg of mAb,
`(obtained after the first mAb injection at times
`
`Inhibition of binding of 1251-labeled mAb 17-1A to rabbit
`Table 1.
`anti-1d 17-1A by patients ' sera
`
`Serum
`no.
`
`Days
`after mAb
`injection
`
`23
`
`09
`
`14
`
`08
`
`0*
`108
`184
`0*
`28
`0
`49
`0*
`7t
`
`% inhibition of
`binding of 1251-labeled
`17-1A to rabbit anti-
`Id 17-1A
`
`10%
`
`25%
`
`50%
`
`0
`25
`17
`NT
`NT
`0
`10
`0
`31
`
`21
`96
`NT
`20
`46
`NT
`NT
`21
`64
`
`2
`73
`87
`NT
`NT
`0
`17
`NT
`NT
`
`Rabbit anti-1d 17-1A (7.5 ~-tglml) was coupled to polystyrene
`beads. 1251-labeled 17-1A (12 ,500 cpm) was first incubated on ice
`with 10%, 25%, or 50% serum for 1 hr and then added to the coupled
`beads. Percentage of inhibition of binding of 1251-labeled 17-1A to
`rabbit anti-1d 17-1A was calculated by the following formula: %
`[(100 x cpm bound in presence of ser(cid:173)
`binding inhibition = 100 -
`um)/ cpm bound without serum] . NT, not tested .
`*Sample obtained immediately before mAb injection.
`tserum obtained 7 days after second administration of mAb.
`
`indicated in Fig. 1), were shown to be human immunoglob(cid:173)
`ulins by binding to 1251-labeled anti-human F(ab'h frag(cid:173)
`ments. The yield of anti-ld protein from serum samples var(cid:173)
`ied: from no. 08, 13 JLg/ml; from no. 07, 8.9 JLg/ml; from no.
`23, 43 JLg/ml. The largest amount was obtained from no. 23,
`
`' : ~
`H
`...
`7 w
`,.., f\
`
`8
`
`6
`
`Q
`)( 5
`~
`a..
`(.)
`
`4
`
`~
`
`• t
`
`: .
`)
`) .
`
`•
`
`PAT IENTS •
`• 23
`• 07
`• 08
`
`•
`
`•
`
`3 ~ 2
`J
`l
`
`.
`
`•
`
`20
`
`80
`100 200 300 400 500
`40
`60
`DAYS AFTER MAb TREATMENT
`
`FIG. 1. Presence of human anti-mouse globulin antibody in sera
`of three subjects as determined by binding to mouse mAb 17-1A in
`the presence of 1251-labeled rabbit anti-human F(ab'h immunoglob(cid:173)
`ulin (14) . Dotted arrows indicate days after treatment when serum
`samples used for isolation of anti-idiotypic antibody were taken (one
`sample from patient 23 , pooled sera from patients 07 and 08). Solid
`arrows indicate the last day of circulation of mAb 17-1A in patient
`blood.
`
`PFIZER EX. 1104
`Page 4
`
`

`

`218
`
`Immunology : Koprowski et a/.
`
`Proc. Nat/. Acad. Sci. USA 81 ( 1984)
`
`Patient
`08
`07
`23
`
`Table 2. Binding of human anti-idiotype 17-1A antibodies to monoclonal antibodies
`Binding of 1251-labeled mAb to anti-ld, cpm
`Anti-ld ,
`A5C3
`C41472
`C42032
`17-1A
`1-Lg/ ml
`166 ± 18
`308 ± 44
`1,693 ± 131
`214 ± 31
`< 5.0
`1,023 ± 91
`251 ± 29
`168 ± 26
`363 ± 21
`6
`813 ± 101
`427 ± 24
`512 ± 59
`21,339 ± 156
`18
`427 ± 23
`NT
`7,956 ± 293
`208 ± 15
`7
`cpm bound to normal human lgG (40 1-Lg/ ml) of 1251-labeled 17-1A, C42032, and A5C3 were 151 ± 25,
`139 ± 32, and 247 ± 32, respectively. Results represent mean ± SD of triplicate determinations. NT,
`not tested.
`
`which also showed the highest levels of anti-mouse globulin
`antibodies (Fig. 1).
`Binding of the isolated anti-Id to mAb 17-1A and to three
`other mAbs is shown in Table 2. The results indicate that the
`binding of anti-Ids from all three sera to mAb 17-1A was sig(cid:173)
`nificantly higher than to the three other mAbs, two of which
`(C42032 and C41472) also detect antigenic sites on CRC cells,
`though these sites are different from those recognized by
`mAb 17-1A (10). Immunoglobulin isolated from sera of all
`three subjects prior to exposure to mAb 17-1A was adjusted
`to approximately 2.5 1-tg/ ml and coupled to pol ystyrene
`beads. These preparations did not bind any of the mAbs list(cid:173)
`ed in Table 1, indicating the absence of anti-ld in pre-expo(cid:173)
`sure serum.
`These results indicate that anti-ld could be detected by the
`screening assay in four sera of patients injected with mouse
`mAb and that anti-Id could be isolated and purified from
`three sera reacting only with the idiotype injected into the
`patient.
`Crossreactivity Between Human Anti-Ids. The results of
`the competition assay (Table 3) indicate significant cross(cid:173)
`reactivity between the anti-Ids of sera of patients 07 and 23
`and slightly less but still significant crossreactivity between
`anti-ld sera of patients 08 and 23 . Similar crossreactivity was
`found between anti-Id 07 and post-mAb serum obtained from
`no. 08 (results not shown). These results suggest that the
`anti-Ids in different patients are directed against the same
`site.
`Is the Anti-Id Directed to the Framework or Antigenic Site
`of the ldiotype Determinants? To answer this question , 125I(cid:173)
`Iabeled mAb 17-1A was incubated with a 3 M KCI cell ex(cid:173)
`tract of a human colon carcinoma that binds mAb 17-1A and
`with 3 M KCI extract of melanoma cell s that does not bind
`mAb 17-1A. The antibody-antigen mixture was then added
`to no. 23 anti-Id-coated beads and binding was compared
`with binding of the radiola beled mAb alone . These experi(cid:173)
`ments were performed with non saturating amounts of iodin(cid:173)
`ated mAb to detect changes in binding with small amounts of
`competitive haptens. For control purposes, the iodinated
`mAb 17-1A was mixed with an extract from melanoma cells
`that had previously been shown to not bind mAb 17-1A. The
`CRC cell extracts in concentrations of 0.1 or 0.5 mg/ ml were
`found to inhibit the binding of anti-ld to iodinated mAb 17-
`1A by 39% and 68% , respectively , whereas the extract from
`melanoma cells in concentrations up to 0.5 mg of protein/ ml
`
`Table 3. Crossreactivity between human anti-Ids in competition
`assay for detection of anti-ld
`
`First
`Anti-ld 23
`
`Antibody
`Second
`None
`07 Pre-mAb
`Post-mAb
`08 Pre-mAb
`Post-mAb
`
`cpm bound
`4,297
`4,595
`1,231
`4,097
`2,585
`
`% inhibition
`of mAb 17-1A
`binding
`
`0
`71
`5
`40
`
`did not significantly affect mAb binding (Table 4) . Thi s hap.
`ten inhibition of the binding reaction suggests the presence
`of an " internal image " of the CRC epitope on the anti-ld mol(cid:173)
`ecule , as supported by the finding that the 3M KCI extract of
`CRC cells did not bind to the anti-Id but did bind, as expect(cid:173)
`ed, to mAb 17-1A.
`Stimulation of B Cells by mAb 17-IA. Buffy coat cells were
`obtained from patient 23, 5 months after injection of mAb,
`and from patient 08 , 20 month s after injection of mAb. The
`percentage of lymphocytes that specificall y bound 17-1A
`F(ab'h of patient 08 was 1.2 and that of patient 23 was 0.2.
`During 7 days in culture with mAb 17-1A, the percentage of
`lymphocytes of patient 23 that specifically bound 17-1A
`F(ab'h increased from 0.2 to 13 . All the 17-1A-binding cells
`were present in the B-cell population . In addition , after 9
`days , human anti-17-1A mAb IgG was detected . Incubation
`of lymphocytes from the same patient with anti-influenza
`mAb under identical conditions produced no detectable hu(cid:173)
`man Ig to either mAb 17-1A or anti-influenza mAb .
`Patients Who Responded with a Remission After mAb
`Treatment. Table 5 gives data on five patients , four of whom
`had a small to medium tumor burden of metastatic or recur(cid:173)
`rent colorectal adenocarcinoma (14) and one, no . 14, who
`had a pancreatic carcinoma with small liver metastases . The
`tumors in all five patients regressed after a single admi nistra(cid:173)
`tion of mAb 17-1A. Anti-Id was detected in the sera of four
`patients in the screening test , and the anti-Id was isolated
`and purified from sera of three other patients. Three patients
`(nos. 07, 09, and 14) are currently without evidence of tumor
`growth. Patient 08 had a local recurrence of tumor 18 months
`after mAb 17-1A treatment without any additional therapeu(cid:173)
`tic measures. It is too soon to evaluate the long-term thera(cid:173)
`peutic results in patient 23 .
`
`DISCUSSION
`mAb 17-1A has been used successfully to diagnose gastroin(cid:173)
`testi nal cancers in humans by binding to tumor tissue in situ
`
`Table 4. Hapten inhibition of binding of human anti- ld to
`mAb 17-1A
`
`Hapten
`
`Source
`CRC SW-1222
`
`MEL SK-MEL-21
`
`% inhibition of binding
`of anti-Id 23 to
`Cone.,
`1251-labeled 17-1A
`mg/ ml
`68.5
`0.5
`39.4
`0.1
`6.6
`0.5
`0.1
`0
`CRC = colorectal cancer tissue culture line. MEL = melanoma
`tissue culture line. 1251-Labeled mAb 17-1A was mixed with 3 M KCl
`cell extracts to final extract concentrations of 0.5 and 0.10 mg/ml
`and 62,500 cpm of iodinated mAb per mi. After a 1-hr incubation on
`ice, 200 I-Ll of the mixture or 200 I-Ll of iodinated mAb alone was
`added per polystyrene bead coupled with anti-ld 17-1A (15 1-Lgf ml;
`patient 23) and this mixture was incubated overnight at 4°C. Results
`were calculated by the followi ng formula : % inhibition of binding "'
`[(100 x cpm bound in the presence of extract)/ cpm bound
`100 -
`without extract].
`
`PFIZER EX. 1104
`Page 5
`
`

`

`Immunology: Koprowski et a/.
`
`Proc. Nat/. Acad. Sci. USA 81 (1984)
`
`219
`
`Anti-Id response in patients who had a disease
`after one injection of mAb 17-1A
`
`17-1A mAb treatment
`
`Anti-ld response
`
`Date
`
`Amount , mg Screening*
`
`December 1981
`December 1981 t
`March 1982
`September 1982
`February 1983
`
`125
`92
`133
`433
`845
`
`ND
`+
`+
`+
`+
`
`Isolationt
`+
`+
`ND
`ND
`+
`
`by detection of the radiolabeled antibody by gamma
`(10). This does not preclude the possibility that
`antigen defined by mAb 17-1A may act as an im(cid:173)
`to elicit host immune mechanisms for the control
`growth. As several patients benefited from treat-
`with mAb 17-1A, a functional involvement of immune
`"""''~~<""" specifically connected with the 17-1A-defined
`sted.
`~u"v''"'" mAb may directly destroy tumor cells by activa(cid:173)
`of complement or by interaction with macrophages or
`cells (17, 18), it is possible that other mechanisms may

`in the present study because of the need for
`large amounts of mAb to interact with all antigenic sites
`cells of a solid tumor mass and because of the long
`period to measure the antitumor effect. In fact , the
`in size and eventual disappearance of lung metasta-
`which could be measured by radiography , occurred over
`months in one patient (10). Thus, although one may ex(cid:173)
`to observe an antitumor effect a long time after the ad-
`.
`of mAb , binding of mAb to metastatic tumor
`samples was detected only up to 1 wk after injection
`(results not shown).
`mechanism might involve a network of in(cid:173)
`anti-idiotypic T and B cells directed against the
`Among them may be those that react with the mAb
`site. Such anti-Id would be considered internal im(cid:173)
`the tumor antigen. The hapten inhibition binding de(cid:173)
`in the present paper suggests that an internal image
`the 17-1A CRC antigen was produced by the anti-Id re(cid:173)
`. Although it is still difficult to correlate the presence
`with the outcome of the immunotherapy, it should
`•·mtenlllOlled that three patients who produced anti-Id have
`tumor regression and currently have no detectable dis(cid:173)
`One had remission lasting 18 months, and it is still too
`to evaluate the outcome in the fifth patient. Sera of
`other patients who are apparently in remission were
`for the presence of anti-ld but they did not seem to
`anti-mouse globulin antibodies. The assay for the
`does not reflect the immune status of the individual
`B cells of one of the patients are stimulated in vitro by
`17-1A similarly to patients who had had circulating
`globulin antibodies (results not shown). In such
`repeated injection of mouse mAb could disturb the
`c--·•n•,><u' '"immune state, boosting the production of anti-ld
`may or may not be reactive with other determinants on
`immunoglobulin. Because the test for detection of
`••uumclr antibody in cancer patients is rather insensitive,
`determination of an anti-Id response , which detects small
`(<5.0 J.Lg) of the antibody, may be the only indica(cid:173)
`of functional changes in the network system.
`As all human anti-Ids showed crossreactivity, it seems
`that the inoculation of mAb 17-1A in other subjects
`induce production of crossreacting anti-Ids and possi-
`
`bly identical internal images of the cancer antigen. The pres(cid:173)
`ence of an internal image of an antigen on a human immuno(cid:173)
`globulin molecule, in contrast to the presence of the antigen
`on a tumor cell, may change the conditions under which the
`immune system reacts to the tumor antigen. Modulation of
`the immune response of the subject as a result of such anti(cid:173)
`gen presentation may explain a successful outcome of immu(cid:173)
`notherapy.
`The most direct evidence for a beneficial effect of anti-Id
`would be the administration of anti-Id produced in a patient
`to a nonresponsive cancer patient and the triggering of an
`antitumor response , which could be measured in vivo and in
`vitro. This may not be feasible because of the paucity of hu(cid:173)
`man anti-Id. One must turn , therefore, to the production of
`xenogeneic anti-Id, which can be obtained in animals with(cid:173)
`out difficulty. The slight advantage of this approach lies in
`the possibility of using a variety of mAbs to produce anti-Id
`antibodies and, if internal images are produced , they may
`"mimic" a large number of heterogeneous antigens of the
`tumor cells.
`
`We wish to express our thanks to Dr. Fritz Melchers for his help(cid:173)
`ful critical evaluation of the data and to Dr. Louis Staudt for the
`review of the paper. This research was supported in part by National
`Institutes of Health Grants CA-33491, CA-25874 , CA-10815, and Al-
`19607.
`
`3.
`
`5.
`
`1. Levy , R . & Miller, R. A. (1983) Fed. Proc. Fed. Am . Soc. Exp.
`Bioi. 42, 2650-2656.
`2. Ritz, J ., Pesando, J . M., Sallan, S . E., Clavell, L. A., Notis(cid:173)
`McConarty , J. , Rosenthal , P. & Schlossman, S. F. (1981)
`Blood 58, 141-152.
`Jaffers , G. J. , Colvin , R. B. , Cosimi, A. B., Giorgi , J . V.,
`Goldstein , G., Fuller, T . C. , Kurnick , J. T ., Lillehie, C. &
`Russell , P. S. (1983) Transplant . Proc. 15, 646-648.
`4. Miller, R. A., Maloney , D . G., Warnke, R. & Levy , R. (1982)
`N. Engl. J. Med. 306, 517-522.
`Jerne , N. K . (1980) in ldiotypes-What They Said At The
`Time , Discussion at Les Baux-de-Provence, April 2-3, 1976,
`ed. Schnurr, l. (Basel Institute of Immunology, Basel, Swit(cid:173)
`zerland) , pp. 1-8.
`6. Eichmann , K. & Rajewsky , K. (1975) Eur. J. lmmunol. 5, 661-
`666.
`7. Sege , K . & Peterson , P. A. (1978) Proc. Nat/. Acad. Sci. USA
`75, 2443-2447 .
`.
`8. Sacks , D. L. , Esser, K. M. & Sher, A. (1982) J. Exp. Med.
`155, 1108-1119.
`9. Herlyn, M. , Steplewski, Z. , Herlyn , D. & Koprowski, H .
`(1979) Proc . Nat!. Acad. Sci. USA 16, 1438-1442.
`10. Koprowski , H ., in Monoclonal Antibodies and Cancer, Pro(cid:173)
`ceedings of the Fourth Armand Hammer Cancer Symposium,
`eds . Boss, B. D., Langman , R. E. , Trowbridge , I. S. & Dul(cid:173)
`becco, R. (Academic, New York), in press .
`11. Wands , J . R., Carlson, R. I. , Schoemaker, H., lsselbacher,
`K. J. & Zurawski , V. R. (1981) Proc. Nat/. Acad. Sci. USA 78,
`1214-1218.
`12. Ey, P. L., Prowse , S. J. & Jenkin, C. R. (1978) Immunoch em(cid:173)
`istry 15, 429-436.
`13. Herlyn , M. , Sears, H . F. , Steplewski, Z. & Koprowski , H .
`(1982) J. Clin . lmmuno/. 2, 135-140.
`14. Sears , H . F., Mattis , J., Herlyn , D., Hayry, P., Atkinson, B.,
`Ernst, C., Steplewski , Z. & Koprowski , H. (1982) Lancet i,
`762-765.
`15. DeFreitas, E., Vella, S., Linnenbach, A. , Zmijewski, C. & Ko(cid:173)
`prowski, H. (1982) Proc. Nat/. Acad. Sci. USA 19, 6646-6650.
`16. Pellogrino , M., Ferrone, S., Dierich , M. & Reisfeld , R. (1975)
`Clin. lmmunol. lmmun opathol. 3, 324-333.
`17. Herlyn, D. & Koprowski , H. (1982) Proc. Nat/. Acad. Sci.
`USA 19, 4761-4765.
`18. Steplewski, Z., Herlyn , D. , Maul, G. & Koprowski , H. (1983)
`Hydridoma 2, 1-5.
`
`PFIZER EX. 1104
`Page 6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket