throbber
W091109967
`
`- 41 -
`
`PCT/GB90/02017
`
`TABLE 1
`CODE
`
`CDR-GRAFTED GENE CONSTRUCTS
`MOUSE SEQUENCE
`CONTENT
`
`METHOD OF
`CONSTRUCTION
`
`KOZAK
`SEQUENCE
`
`+
`
`121B
`
`221
`221A
`
`LIGHT CHAIN
`ALL HUMAN FRAMEWORK REl
`121
`26-32, 50-56. 91-96 inclusive
`l21A
`26-32 , 50-56, 91-96 inclusive
`+1, 3. 46. 47
`26-32, 50-56, 91 - 96 inclusive
`+ 46, 47
`24 -24 , 50-56, 91-96 inclusive
`24-34 , 50-56, 91- 96 inclusive
`+1, 3, 46, 47
`24-34, 50- 56 , 91 - 96 inclusive
`+1. 3
`24-34, 50-56, 91-96 inclusive
`
`221B
`
`221C
`
`HEAVY CHAIN
`ALL HUMAN FRAMEWORK KOL
`121
`26-32, 50·56, 95 -lOOB inclusive
`131
`26- 32, 50-58, 95- l OOB inclusive
`141
`26 - 32, 50·65, 95-lOOB inclusive
`321
`26- 35, 50·56 , 95- l OOB inclusive
`331
`26-35, 50-58, 95-lOOB inclusive
`
`341
`
`26-35 , 50· 65, 95-lOOB inclusive
`
`341A
`
`341B
`
`26-35 , 50-65, 95-lOOB inclusive
`+6, 23 , 24, 48 , 49, 71, 73, 76,
`
`(~8~8~~ 9~\+-t:-u--ruman)
`26-35, 50-65 , 95- l OOB inclusive
`+ 48 , 49, 71, 73, 76, 78, 88, 91
`(+63 + human)
`
`SDM and gene
`Partial gene
`
`assembly
`assembly
`
`n . d.
`+
`n.d. +
`
`Parcial gene assembly
`
`n.d. +
`
`Parcial gene assembly
`Parci al gene assembly
`
`Parcial gene assembly
`
`+
`
`+
`
`+
`
`Par tial gene assembly
`
`+
`
`+
`+
`
`+
`
`+
`
`Gene assembly
`Gene assembly
`Partial gene assembly
`Parcial gene assemb l y
`Partial gene assembly
`Gene assembly
`SOH
`Par tial gene assembly
`Gene assembly
`
`n.d . +
`n . d. +
`n.d.
`+
`n. d .
`+
`+
`
`+
`
`+
`
`+
`n.d .· +
`
`Gene as sembly
`
`n.d. +
`
`KEY
`n .d .
`SDM
`Gene assembly
`Parcial gene
`assembly
`
`not done
`Site directed mutagenesis
`Variabl e region assembled entirely f r om oligonucl eotides
`Variabl e region assembled by combination of restriction
`fragments either from ocher genes ori ginally created by SDM
`and gene assembly or by ol i gonucleotide assembly of pare of
`the variable region and reconstruction with restriction
`fragments from other genes originally created by SDM and gene
`assembly
`
`-- ---
`
`Board Ass gned Page #723
`
`PFIZER EX. 1095
`Page 876
`
`

`

`wo 91/09967
`
`PCT/GB90/02017
`
`14.
`14 .1.
`
`- 42 -
`
`EXPRESSION OF CDR-GRAFTED GENES
`PRODUCTION OF ANTIBODY CONSISTING OF GRAFTED LIGHT
`(gL) CHAINS WITH MOUSE HEAVY (mH) OR CHIMERIC
`HEAVY (cH) CHAINS
`All gL chains, in association with mH or cH
`produced reasonable amounts of antibody.
`Insertion of the Kozak consensus sequence at a
`position 5' to the ATG (kgL constructs) however,
`led to a 2-5 fold improvement in net expression.
`Over an extended series of experiments expression
`levels were raised from approximately 200ng/ml to
`approximately 500 ng/ml for kgL/cH or kgL/mH
`combinations.
`When direct binding to antigen on HUT 78 cells was
`measured, a construct designed to include mouse
`sequence based on loop length (gL121) did not lead
`to active antibody in association with mB or cH.
`A construct designed to include mouse s~quence
`r .::.o r:o NO·.?.D_
`based on Kabat CDRs ( gL221 ~'demonstrated some weak
`binding in association with mH or cH.
`However,
`when framework residues 1, 3, 46, 47 were changed
`from the human to the murine OKT3 equivalents
`based on the arguments outlined in Section 12.1
`antigen binding was demonstrated when both of the
`new constructs, which were termed 121A and 221A
`were co-expressed with cH. When the effects of
`these residues were examined in more detail, it
`appears that residues 1 and 3 are not major
`contr~uting r7ftdues as the product of the gL221B
`cs h -:til w:.t,_ 1 d
`bl b · d ·

`· t

`geneAs ows li t e etecta e ~n ~ng act~v~ y ~n
`association wit~ ~H.
`The l ight chain product of
`~~t:-U ~\) ND.Z$
`gL221~, in wbich ouse sequences are present at 46
`and 47, shows good binding activity in association
`with cH.
`
`I -·~
`
`Board Ass gned Page #724
`
`PFIZER EX. 1095
`Page 877
`
`

`

`W091/09967
`
`PCf/GB90/02017
`
`14. 2
`
`- 43 -
`
`PRODUCTION OF ANTIBODY CONSISTING OF GRAFTED HEAVY
`( gH) CHAINS WIT~ MOUSE LIGHT
`( rnL ) OR CHIMERI C
`LIGHT (cL ) CHAINS
`Expression of .the gH genes proved to be more
`difficult to achieve than f o r gL.
`First,
`inclusion of the Kozak sequence appeared to have
`no marked effect on expressio n of gH genes.
`Expression appears to be slightly improved but not
`to the same degree as seen f o r the grafted light
`chain.
`Also, it p~oved difficult to demonstrate
`production of expected quantities of material when
`the loop choice (amino acid 26-3 2) f or CDRl is
`used, e.g. 9H121, 131, 141 and . no conclusions can
`~ :r)) NO: 11)
`be drawn about these constructs.
`Moreover, co~expressio n of the gH341 gene~ with cL
`o r mL has been variable and has tended to produce
`l ower amounts of antibody than the cH/cL o r mH/mL
`)
`( $6Q I.b NO'. I I
`.
`,
`.
`comb1.nat1.ons .
`The al t..erat,Lo.ns to gH~ l.A t o
`f"~-s;:,>~:l'l;-1 L~J:(,.(, ~.() \'IU5<2.J ) ....
`produce gH34l~ana gH341B lead t o ~mproved level s
`1\
`A
`of expression.
`This may be due either to a general increase in
`the fraction of mouse sequence in the variable
`region, or to the alteration at position 63 where
`the residue is returned to the human amino acid
`Valine (Val) from Phenylalanine (Phe) to avoid
`possible internal packing prob l ems with the rest
`of the human framework.
`This arrangement also
`occurs in gH331 and gH32 1.
`When gH321 or gH331 were expr e s sed i n association
`with cL, ant i body was produced but a n tib ody
`( '5\!0- ~ ~Oi !1)
`binding act i vity was not detected.
`When the more c onservative gB34 1 geneAwas u~ed
`antigen binding could be detected i n association
`with cL or rnL, but the activity was only
`marginally above the background level.
`
`f
`
`•
`
`'
`•
`
`Board Ass gned Page #725
`
`PFIZER EX. 1095
`Page 878
`
`

`

`wo 91/09967
`
`PCf/GB90/02017
`
`14.3
`
`- 44 -
`
`When f urther mouse residues were substituted based
`on the arguments in 12.1, antigen binding could be
`clearly demonstrated for the antibody produced
`when kgB341A and kgB341B were expresse d in
`association with cL.
`PRODUCTION OF FULLY CDR-GRAFTED ANTIBODY
`The kgL221A gene was co-expressed wit h kgH341,
`kgH341A or kgH341B.
`For the combination
`kgH221A/ kgH341 very lit t l e mat erial was produced
`in a normal COS c e l l expression.
`For the combinations kgL221A/ kgH341A or
`kgH221A/ kgH341B amounts of antibody s imil ar t o
`gL/ cH was produced.
`In several experiments no antigen binding activi t y
`coul d be detected with kgB221A/ gH341 or
`kgH221A/ kgH341 combinations , a l though expression
`levels were very low.
`Ant igen binding was de t ec t ed when kgL221A/ kgH341A
`or kgH221A/ kgH341B combinations were expressed.
`In the case of the antibody produced from the
`kgL221A/kgH341A combination the antigen binding
`was very similar to that of the chimeric antibody.
`
`An analysis of the above results is given bel ow.
`
`15.
`
`DISCUSSION OF CDR-GRAFTING RESULTS
`I n the design of the ful l y humanised antibody the
`aim was t o transfer the minimum number of mouse
`amino acids that would confer ant igen binding onto
`a human antibody framework.
`LIGHT CHAIN
`15 . 1.
`15.1.1. EXTENT OF THE CDRs
`For the l ight c hain the regions defining the loops
`known from structural studies of other antibodies
`to contain t he antigen cont acting residues, and
`
`f • /
`
`Board Ass gned Page #726
`
`PFIZER EX. 1095
`Page 879
`
`

`

`W09l/09967
`
`PCf/G 890/02017
`
`- 45 -
`
`those hypervariable sequences defined by Kabat ~
`al (refs. 4 and 5 ) as Complementarity Determining
`Regions ( CDRs) are equivalent for CDR2 .
`For CDR!
`the hypervariable region extends from residues
`:1
`24-34 inclusive while the structural l oop extends
`(.)~Q .I'D Y'«)S;
`from 26-32 inclusive.
`In the case of OKT3Athere
`is only one amino acid difference between the two
`options, at amino acid 24, where the mouse
`sequence is a serine and the human framework REl
`has glutamine.
`For CDR3 the loop extends from
`residues 91-96 inclusive while the Kabat
`;q
`hypervariability extends from residues 89-97
`inclusive.
`For 0KT3 amino acids 89, 90 and 97 . N" 'b~rJ9
`{SEQ t:-D
`v_:,..
`/
`are the same between OKT3 and REl (Fig. 3~; When
`constructs based on the l oop choice for CDRl
`{gL12l) and the Kabat choice (gL221) were made and
`co-expressed with mH or cH no evidence for antigen
`binding activity could be found for gL121, but
`trace activity could be detected for the gL221,
`suggesting that a single extra mouse residue in
`the grafted variable region could have some
`detectable effect.
`Both gene constructs were
`reasonably well expressed in the transient
`expression system.
`15.1.2. FRAMEWORK RESIDUES
`The remaining framework residues were then further
`examined, in particular amino acids known from
`X-ray analysis of other an t ibodies to be close to
`the CDRs and also those amino acids which in OKT3
`showed differences from the consensus framework
`for the mouse subgroup (subgroup VI) to which 0KT3
`shows most homo logy.
`Four positions 1, 3 , 46 and
`47 were identified and their possible contribution
`was examined by substituting the mouse amino acid
`for the human amino acid at each position.
`Therefore gL221A (gL221 + DlQ, Q3V, L46R, L47W,
`
`I /
`
`Board Ass gned Page #727
`
`PFIZER EX. 1095
`Page 880
`
`

`

`wo 91/09967
`
`PCT/GB90/020J 7
`
`- 46 -
`
`see Figure 3 and Table 1) was made, cloned in
`EE6hCMVneo and co-expressed with cH (pJA144). The
`resultant antibody was wel l expressed a nd showed
`good bindi9q activity. When the rela ted genes
`l)fD .).."<;:!
`['ol~·.t..~l
`gL2 21BA( gL221 + Dl Q, Q3V) and gL221C (gL221 +
`L46R, L47W ) were made and similarly tested, whi l e
`both genes produced antibody when co-expressed
`with cH, only the gL221C/c.H combination s howed
`good antigen binding. When the gL121A (gL121 +
`DlQ, Q3V, L46R, L47W) gene was made and
`co-expressed with cH, antibody was produced which
`also bound to antigen.
`HEAVY CHAIN
`15.2.
`15. 2 .1. EXTENT OF THE CDRs
`For the heavy chain the loop and hypervariability
`analyses agree only in CDR3.
`For CDRl t he loop
`region extends from r e sidues 26-32 inclusive
`whereas the Kabat CDR e xtends from residues 31-35
`incl usive.
`For CDR2 the loop region is from
`S0-58 inclusive while the hypervariable region
`c overs amino acids 50-65 incl usive.
`Therefore
`humani sed heavy chains were constructed using the
`f ramework from antibody KOL and with various
`combinations of these CDR choices, including a
`shorter choice for CDR2 of S0-56 inclusive as
`t here was some uncertainty as to the definition of
`the end point for the CDR2 loop around residues 56
`to 58 .
`The genes were co-expressed with mL or cL
`initially.
`In the case of the gH genes with loop
`choices for CDRl e.g. gH121, gH131 , gB141 very
`little antibody was produced in the culture
`supernatants.
`As no free light chain was
`detected it was presumed that the antibody was
`being made and assembled inside the cell but that
`the heavy chain was aberrant in some way, possibly
`incorrectly folded, and t herefore the an tibody was
`
`Board Assigned Page #728
`
`PFIZER EX. 1095
`Page 881
`
`

`

`wo 91 /09967
`
`PCT/GB90/02017
`
`- 47 -
`
`In some experiments
`being degraded internally.
`trace amoun~s of antibody could be detected in 35s
`labelling studies.
`As no net antibody was produced, analysis of t hese
`constructs was not pursued further.
`When, however, a combination of the loop choice -
`and the Kabat choice for CDRl was t e sted (mouse
`amino acids 26-35 i nc lusive) and in which residues
`31 (Ser to Arg ) , 33 {Ala to Thr ) , and 35 (Tyr to
`His) were changed f rom the human residues t o the
`mouse residue and c ompared to the first series,
`antibody was produced f or gH321, kgH33 1 and kgH341
`Expression was
`when co-expressed wi th cL.
`generally low and could not be markedly improved
`by the insertion of the Kozak consensus sequence
`5 ' to t he ATG of the s i gnal sequence of t he gene,
`as distinct from the case of the gL genes where
`such insert ion led to a 2-5 fold increase in net
`However, only in the case
`antibody production.
`of gH341 / mL or kgH341/cL could marginal antigen
`binding activity be demonstrated. When tg~ 'J.."\:1 1-JD'. 2. ~
`kgH341 gene was co-expressed with kgL221~ the net
`yield of antibody was t oo low to give a signal
`above the background level in the antigen binding
`assay.
`15.2.2. FRAMEWORK RESIDUES
`As in the case of the light chain the heavy chain
`frameworks were re-examined.
`Possibly because of
`the lower initial homology between the mouse and
`human heavy variable domains compared to the light
`chains, more amino acid positions proved to be of
`interest.
`Two genes kgH341A and kgH341B were
`constructed, with 11 or 8 human residues
`respecti vel y substitut ed by mouse residues
`compared to gH341, and with the CDR2 residue 63
`returned to the human amino acid potentially to
`
`Board Assigned Page #729
`
`PFIZER EX. 1095
`Page 882
`
`

`

`wo 91/09967
`
`PCf/GB90/02017 ·
`
`1 5. 3
`
`- 48 -
`
`Both showed antigen
`improve domain packing.
`binding when combined with cL or kgL221A, the
`kgH3 4 1A gene with all 11 changes appearing to be
`the superior choice.
`INTERIM CONCLUSIONS
`It has been demonstrated, therefore, for 0KT3 that
`to transfer antigen binding ability to the
`humanised antibody, mouse residues outside the CDR
`regions defined by the Kabat hypervariability or
`structural loop choices are required for both the
`light and heavy chains.
`Fewer e xtra residues are
`needed for the light chain, possibly due to the
`higher initial homology between the mouse and
`human kappa variab le regions~
`Of the . changes seven (1 a nd 3 from the light chain
`and 6 , 23, 71 , 73 and 76 from the heavy chain) are
`predicted from a know l edge of other antibody
`structures t o be eit her partly exposed or on t he
`antibody surface.
`It has been shown here that
`residues 1 and 3 in the light chain are not
`absolutely required to be the mouse sequence;
`for the heavy chain the gH341B heavy c hain in
`combination with the 221A light chain generated
`only weak binding activity.
`Therefore the
`presence of the 6, 23 and 24 changes are important
`to maintain a binding affinity similar to that of
`the murine antibody.
`It was important,
`therefore, to further study the individual
`contribution of othe other 8 mouse residues of the
`kgH341A gene compared to kgH341.
`
`and
`
`16.
`
`FURTHER CDR-GRAFTING EXPERIMENTS
`Additional . CDR-grafted heavy chain genes were
`prepared substantially as described above. With
`reference to Table 2 the further heavy chain genes
`were based upon the gh341 (plasmid pJAl 78) and
`
`Board Assigned Page #730
`
`PFIZER EX. 1095
`Page 883
`
`

`

`wo 91/09967
`
`PCf/GB90/02017
`
`. (J--'
`~'0· 'l
`
`- 49 -
`c.:;8Q '(_\)
`gH341A (pl asm~d pJA185 ~ wi th either mouse OKT3 or
`human KOL res~dues at _6 , 23 , 24 , 48, 4 9, 63, 71,
`The CDR(cid:173)
`73, 76, 78, 88 and 91, as indicate d.
`grafted light c hain g~nes us~d in these furthef
`(~:fDI'JV.i
`lSEQl>PNO:tb ) l~E:Q:COND:Zt> )~'l"J>!IO: Z!7
`experiments were gL22~ , gL221~ gL22 1BAand gL221~
`as described above.
`
`Board Assigned Page #731
`
`PFIZER EX. 1095
`Page 884
`
`

`

`PCT / GB90/02017
`
`wo 91/09967
`
`TA@LE 2
`
`OKT3 HEAVY CHAI N CDR GRAFTS
`
`l.
`
`gH34l and derivatives
`
`- 50 -
`
`24 . 48 . 49
`A
`G
`I
`v
`s
`I
`A
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`23
`K
`s
`K
`
`K
`
`K
`
`K
`
`K
`
`RES 1NUM
`OKT3vh
`gHJ4l
`gH341A
`gH34lE
`gH34l*
`gHJ41*
`gH341D
`gH341*
`gH34_1C
`gHJ4 l *
`gH341*
`gH34l.B
`gH341*
`gH34l*
`
`A
`
`A
`
`A
`
`A
`
`I
`v
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`A
`A
`A
`
`A
`s
`
`A
`A
`
`gH341"*
`KOL
`(_pf-'Q ·t:-v
`OKTJ LIGHT CHAIN CDR GRAITS
`
`~6
`
`6
`g
`E
`g
`g
`g
`g
`g
`g
`K
`g
`K
`g
`s
`s
`E
`s
`E
`g
`s
`s
`E
`I
`g
`s
`I
`A
`v
`s
`s
`E
`f'.lO: ?f: ID Oild l! - t+)
`';0
`
`63
`
`F
`
`F
`v
`v
`v
`v
`v
`v
`F
`v
`v
`v
`v
`v
`v
`
`7l
`T
`R
`T
`T
`T
`R
`T
`R
`
`R
`T
`T
`
`T
`T
`T
`T
`R
`
`73
`K
`
`N
`
`K
`
`K
`
`K
`
`N
`
`K
`
`N
`
`N
`
`K
`
`K
`
`K
`K
`
`K
`K
`
`N
`
`76
`s
`N
`s
`s
`N
`N
`
`N
`
`N
`N
`s
`s
`s
`s
`s
`N
`
`N
`
`78
`
`A
`L
`
`A
`
`A
`
`A
`A
`L
`
`L
`
`L
`
`A
`
`A
`A
`
`A
`
`A
`
`A
`L
`
`88
`A
`G
`
`A
`G
`
`G
`G
`
`G
`
`G
`G
`A
`
`A
`
`A
`
`G
`G
`G
`G
`
`91
`y
`
`F JA178
`Y JA185
`G JA198-..._
`F JA207-=-
`F JA209
`F JA197
`F JA199
`F JA184
`Y JA203
`Y JA205
`Y J A183
`F JA204
`F J A206
`F JA208
`F
`
`A
`G
`G
`
`G
`
`G
`
`G
`
`G
`A
`G
`
`G
`
`G
`
`G
`
`G
`G
`
`A
`
`2.
`
`gL221 and derivatives
`
`RES ~ l
`g
`OKT3vl
`GL221
`D
`g
`gL2 21A
`g
`gU21B
`GL2 21C
`D
`REl
`
`D
`
`46
`
`47
`
`3
`v
`R
`\.l
`L DA221
`L
`Q
`v
`R W 0A221A
`v
`L
`L DA221B
`t.J DA221C
`R
`Q
`Q !).q L
`L
`
`MURINE RESIDUES ARE UNDERLINED
`
`~ ~ lo£Q ~\) ~o·. %\~ l q &fe\ 'ltD,.. n)
`
`------~
`
`Board Assigned Page #732
`
`PFIZER EX. 1095
`Page 885
`
`

`

`WO 91109967
`
`PCf/GB90/02017
`
`- 51 -
`
`The CDR- grafted heavy and light chain genes were
`co-expressed in COS cells e i ther wit h one another in
`various combinations but also with the corresponding
`murine and chimeric heavy and light chain genes
`substantially as described above.
`The resultant antibody
`products were then assayed in binding and blocking assays
`with BPB-ALL cells as described above.
`
`The results of the assays for various graftgd heavy ~ains
`_f'i:> tc.Q 4=D NU : t~/
`co-expressed with the gL22lC light chai ,~are given in
`Figures 7 and 8 (for the JA184, JA185, JA197 and JA198
`constructs - see Table 2), in Figure 9 (for the JALB~,
`CJ. ~na b
`JA184, JA185 and JA197 constructs) i n Figure 10 (for the
`II
`chimeric, JA185, JA199, JA204, JA2051.~\A207, J A208 and
`JA209 constructs) and in Figure ll;(for the JA183, JA184,
`JA185, JAl98, JA203, JA205 and J A206 co nstructs).
`
`.
`The basic grafted product without any human to murine
`~J
`221(2F..R 4--D NQ.W;


`k

`
`h c anges 1.n the varl.able framewor s, 1..e. ) gL
`.11
`[sro :tP IXb • \ I
`/ '
`co-expressed with gh341 (JA1 78~, and also the "fully
`grafted" product, having most human to murine changes in )
`tsEO :1-0 N.IY. 2..8
`.
`the grafted heavy chain framework , 1..e. gL22lCA
`cswn ~0: 1'2.)
`co-expressed with gh341A (JAlBS~, were assayed for
`relative binding affinity in a competition assay against
`murine OKT3 reference standard, using HPB-ALL cells.
`The
`assay used was as described above in section 3.3.
`The
`results obtained are given in Figure 12 for the basic
`grafted product and in Figure 13 for the fully grafted
`product .
`These results indicate that the basic grafted
`product has neglibible binding abil ity as compared with
`the OKT3 murine reference standard; whereas the "fully
`grafted" product has a binding ability very similar to
`that of the OKT3 murine reference standard.
`
`The binding and blocking assay results indicate the
`following:
`
`Board Assigned Page #733
`
`PFIZER EX. 1095
`Page 886
`
`

`

`wo 91/01)967
`
`PCf/GB?0/02017
`
`- 52 -
`
`The JA198 and JA207 constructs appear to have the best
`binding characteristics and similar binding abilit ies,
`both substantially the same as the chimeric and fully
`grafted gH341A products.
`This indicates that positions
`88 and 91 and position 76 are not highly critical for
`maintaining the OKT3 binding ability; whereas at least
`some of positions 6, 23, 24, 48, 49, 71, 73 and 78 are
`more important.
`
`This is borne out by the finding that the JA20 9 and JA199,
`alt hough of similar binding ability to one anot her, are of
`lower binding ability than the JA198 and JA207
`const ructs.
`This indicates t he import ance of having
`mouse residues at positions 71, 73 and 78, which are
`either completely or parti a l ly human in the JA199 and
`JA209 constructs respectively.
`
`Moreover, on comparing the results obtained for the JA205
`and JA183 constructs it is seen that there is a decrease
`in binding going from the JA2 05 to the JA183 const ructs.
`This indicates the import ance of retaining a mouse residue
`at position 23, the only position changed between JA205
`and JA163.
`
`These and other r e sults lead us t o the conclusion that of
`the 11 mouse framework residues used in the gH341A (JA185 )
`construct, it is import ant to retain mouse residues at all
`of positions 6, 23, 24, 48 and 49, and possibly for
`maximum binding affinit y a t 71, 73 and 76.
`
`Similar Experiments were carried out to CDR-graft a number
`of the rodent antibodies including antibodies having
`specificity for CD4
`(OKT4), ICAM-1 (R6-5 ) , TAG72 (B72.3),
`and TNF~( 6 1E71, 101.4, hTNFl, hTNF2 and hTNF3).
`
`Board Assigned Page #734
`
`PFIZER EX. 1095
`Page 887
`
`

`

`wo 91/09967
`
`PCT/ GB90/0l0 17
`
`- 53 -
`
`EXAMPLE 2
`
`CDR-GRAFTING OF A MURINE ANTI-CD4 T CELL
`RECEPTOR ANTIBODY, OKT4A
`Anti OKT4A CDR-grafted heavy and light chain genes were
`prepared, expressed and tested substantially as described
`above in Example 1 for CDR-grafted OKT3.
`The CDR
`grafting of OKT4A is described in detail in Ortho patent
`application PCT/GB 90 .•••••••• of even date herewith
`entitled "Bwnanised Antibodies ".
`The disclosure of this
`Ortho patent application PCT/GB 90 ··••.••• • • • is
`incorporated herein by reference. A number of
`CDR-grafted OKT4 antibodies have been prepared.
`Presently the ·CDR-graf ted OKT4A of choice is the
`combination of the grafted light chain LCDR2 and the
`grafted heavy chain HCDR10.
`
`THE LIGHT CHAIN
`The human acceptor fr~e~o[k used for the grafted light
`.
`0'S p ~: ~o..ro ~
`chains was REJ,\-
`The pref rred LCDR2 light chain has
`human to mouse changes at positions 33, 34, 38, 49 and 89
`in addition to the structural loop CDRs.
`Of these
`changed positions, positions 33, 34 and 89 fall within the
`preferred extended CDRs of the present invention
`(positions 33 and 34 in CDRl and position 89 in CDR3).
`The human to murine changes at positions 38 and 49
`corresponds to positions at which the amino acid residues
`are preferably donor murine amino acid residues in
`accordance with the present invention.
`A comparison of the amino acid sequences of the donor
`murine light chain variable domain and the RE1 human
`acceptor light chain variable further reveals that the
`murine and human residues are identical at all of
`positions 46, 48 and 71 and at all of positions 2, 4, 6,
`35, 36, 44, 47, 62, 64-69, 85, 87, 98, 99 and 101 and 102.
`However the amino acid residue at position 58 in LCDR2 is
`
`Board Assigned Page #735
`
`PFIZER EX. 1095
`Page 888
`
`

`

`W091/09967
`
`PCf /GB90/ 02017
`
`- 54 -
`
`the human REl framework residue not the mouse OKT4 residue
`as would be pref erred in accordance with the present
`invention.
`
`THE HEAVY CHAIN
`The human acceptor f ramework used for the grafted heavy
`(Sf.G. L-'t> w·. It)~
`.
`cha1.ns was KOL,.r
`The preferred CDR graft HCDR10 he avy chain has human to
`mous e changes at positions 24, 35, 57, 58, 60, 88 and 91
`in addition to the structural l oop CDRs.
`Of thes e positions , positions 35 (CDR1) and positions 57,
`58 and 60 (CDR2 ) fall within the pre f erred extended CDRs
`of the present invention. Also the human t o mouse change
`at position 24 corresponds to a posi tion at which the
`amino acid residue is a donor murine residue in accordance
`with the present invention. Moreover, the human to mouse
`changes at positions 88 and 91 correspond to positions at
`which the amino acid residues are optionally donor murine
`residues.
`Mor eover, a comparison o f the murine OKT4A and human KOL
`heavy chain variable amino acid sequences reveals that the
`murine and huma n res i dues are ide ntical at all of
`positions 2 3 , 49, 7 1, 73 and 78 and at all of positions 2,
`4, 6, 25 , 36, 37, 39, 47, 48, 93, 94, 103, 104, 106 and
`107.
`Thus the OKT4A CDR-grafted heavy chain HCDR10 corresponds
`t o a particularly preferred embodiment according to the
`present inve ntion •
`
`. /
`
`Board Assigned Page #736
`
`PFIZER EX. 1095
`Page 889
`
`

`

`WO 91/09967
`
`PCT/GB90/02017
`
`- 55 -
`
`EXAMPLE 3
`
`CDR-GRAFTING OF AN ANTI-MUCIN SPECIFIC MURINE
`ANTIBODY, 872. 3
`The cloning of the genes coding for the anti-mucin
`specific murine monoclonal antibody 872.3 and the
`preparation of B72.3 mouse-human chimeric antibodies has
`been described previously (ref. 13 and WO 89/01783).
`CDR-grafted versions of B72.3 were prepared as follows.
`(a)
`872.3 Light Chain
`CDR-grafting of this light chain was accomplished
`by direct transfer of the murine CDRs into the
`framework of the human light chain REl.
`The regions transferred were:
`
`CDR Number
`1
`2
`3
`
`Residues
`24-34
`50-56
`90-96
`
`The activity of the resulting grafted light chain
`was assessed by co-expression in COS cells, of
`genes for the combinations:
`B72.3 cB/B72.3 cL
`B72.3 cH/B72.3 gL
`
`and
`
`Supernatants were assayed for antibody
`concentration and for the ability to bind to
`microtitre plates coated with mucin.
`The
`results obtained indicated that, in combination
`with the 872.3 cH chain, 872.3 cL and 872.3 gL
`OJ'~ £1
`had similar binding properties.
`( SeQ 1:~ 00'·V
`Comparison of the murine 872.3 and REIAlight chain amino
`acid sequences reveals that the residues are identical at
`positions 46, 58 and 71 but are different at position 48 •
`
`Board Assigned Page #737
`
`...
`
`. -··
`
`PFIZER EX. 1095
`Page 890
`
`

`

`WO 91/09967
`
`PCr/GB90/02017
`
`- 56 -
`
`Thus changing the human residue to the donor mouse residue
`at position 48 ma y further improve t he b i nding
`c haracteristics of the CDR- grafted light chain, (872.3 gL }
`in accordance with the present invention.
`
`(b)
`
`872 . 3 heavy chain
`i .
`Choice of framework
`At the outset it was necessary to make a
`choice of human framework .
`Simply put,
`the question was as follows : Was it
`necessary to use the framework regions from
`an antibody whose crystal structure was
`known or could the choice be made on some
`other criteria?
`For 872.3 heavy chai n , it wa s reasoned
`that, while knowledge of structure was
`important, transfer of the CDRs from mouse
`to human frameworks might be facilitated if
`t he overall homology between the donor and
`receptor frameworks was maximised.
`Comparison of the B72.3 heavy chain
`sequence with those i n Kabat (ref. 4 ) for
`human heavy chains showed c lear{Jf.~n.t§ (UD'.!OJ
`872.3 had poor homology for KOLAand NEWM
`(for which crystal structures are
`available) but was very homologous to the
`heavy chain for EU.
`On this basis, EU was c hosen for the
`CDR-grafting and the following residues
`transferred as CDRs.
`
`CDR Number
`1
`2
`3
`
`Res idues
`27-36
`50-63
`93-102
`
`Board Assigned Page #738
`
`··---·-- - -
`r -
`
`.... --------·--... '
`
`PFIZER EX. 1095
`Page 891
`
`

`

`wo 91/09967
`
`PCT/GB90/02017
`
`- 57 -
`
`Also it was not i ced that the FR4 region of
`EU was unlike that of any other human (or
`mouse ) antibody .
`Consequently , in the
`grafted heavy chain genes this was also ·
`changed to produce a "consensus" human
`sequence.
`(Preliminary experiments showed
`that grafted heavy c hain genes containing
`the EU FR4 sequence expressed very poorly
`in transient expression systems.)
`ii. Results with grafted heavy chain genes
`Expression of grafted heavy chain genes
`containing all human fr amework regions with
`either gL or cL genes produced a grafted
`antibody with little ability to bind to
`The grafted antibody had about 1%
`mucin.
`the activity of t he c himeric antibody.
`In these experiments, however, it was noted
`t hat the activity of the grafted antibody
`could be increased to,.vlO% of B72.3 by
`exposure to pBs o f 2 - 3 .5.
`This observation provi ded a clue as to how
`the activity of t he grafted antibody could
`be improved without ac i d treatment.
`It
`was p ostulated that acid exposure brought
`about the protonation of a n acidic residue
`(pKa of aspart ic acid • 3 .86 and of
`glutamine acid = 4.2 5) which in turn caused
`a change in structure of t he CDR loops , or
`allowed better acces s of antigen.
`From comparison of the sequences of B72.3
`(re f. 13) and EU ( refs. 4 and 5 ) , it was
`clear that, in going f r om the mouse to
`human frameworks, only two pos i t i o ns . had
`been changed in such a way that acidic
`These
`residues had been introduced.
`
`:' .
`
`..
`
`Board Assigned Page #739
`
`PFIZER EX. 1095
`Page 892
`
`

`

`wo 91/09967
`
`PCT/GB90/02017
`
`- 58 -
`
`/
`
`positions are at residues 73 and 81, where
`K to ~ and Q to E changes had been made,
`respec.tively.
`Which of these positions might be important
`was determined by examining the crystal
`structure of the KOL aniibody.
`In KOL
`(.5 t;:.~ '{::\) ~·. 10
`heavy chain, pos~tion 8
`is far removed
`.
`.A
`from e~ther of the CDR loops.
`Position 73, however 1 is close to both CDRs
`1 and 3 of the heavy chain and 1 in this
`position it was possible to envisage that a
`K to E change in this region could have a
`detrimental effect on antigen binding.
`iii. Framework changes in B72.3 gH gene
`On the basis of the above analysis 1 E73 was
`mutated to a lysine (K).
`It was found
`that this change had a dramatic effect on
`the ability of the grafted Ab to bind to
`mucin.
`Further the ability of the grafted
`B72.3 produced by the mutated gH/gL
`combination to bind to mucin was similar to
`that of the B72.3 chimeric antibody.
`iv. Other framework changes
`In the course of the above experiments,
`other changes were made in the heavy chain
`framework regions. Within the accuracy of
`the assays used 1 none of the changes,
`either alone or together, appeared
`beneficial.
`Other
`All assays used measured the ability of the
`grafted Ab to bind to mucin and, as a whole,
`indicated that the single framework change
`at position 73 is sufficient to generate an
`antibody with similar binding properties to
`B72.3.
`
`v.
`
`Board Assigned Page #740
`
`PFIZER EX. 1095
`Page 893
`
`

`

`wo 91/09967
`
`PCf/GB90/02017
`
`- 59 -
`
`Comparison of the B72.3 murine and EU he avy
`chain sequences reveals that the mouse and
`human residues are identical at positions
`23, 24, 71 and 78 .
`Thus the mutated CDR-grafted B72. 3 heavy
`chain corresponds to a preferred embodiment
`of the present invent i on.
`
`Board Assigned Page #741
`
`PFIZER EX. 1095
`Page 894
`
`

`

`wo 91109967
`
`PIT/GB90/02017
`
`- 60 -
`
`EXAMPLE 4
`
`CDR-GRAFTING OF A MURINE ANTI- I CAM-1 MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY
`A murine antibody, R6- 5-D6 (EP 0314863 ) having specificity'
`for Intercellular Adhesion Molecule 1 (ICAM-1) was
`CDR-grafted substantially as described above in previous
`examples.
`This work is described in greater detail in
`co-pending application, British Patent Application No.
`9009549.8, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein
`by reference.
`The human EU framework was used as the acceptor framework
`for both heavy and light chains.
`The CDR-grafted
`antibody currently of choice i~_provided ~y co-expression
`l'S~ ~\) \\(.)~ 'l-Ie)
`of grafted liqht,chain gL221A and grafted heavy chain
`(.';)~ -n 1'{0·. ll? J
`;\
`gH341D~which has a binding affinity for !CAM 1 of about
`75% of that of the corresponding mouse-human chimeric
`antibody.
`LIGHT CHAIN
`gL221A has murine CORs at positions 24-34 (CDR1), S0-56
`(CDR2) and 89-97 (CDR3).
`In addition several framework
`residu_es are also the murine amino acid.
`These residues
`were chosen after consideration of the possible
`contribution of these residues to domain packing and
`stability of the conformation of the antigen binding
`region.
`The residues which have been retained as mouse
`are at positions 2, 3, 48 (?), 60, 84, 85 and 87.
`Comparison of the murine anti-ICAM 1 and human EU light
`chain amino acid sequences reveals that the murine and
`human residues are identical at positions 46, 58 and 71.
`HEAVY CHAIN
`gH341D has murine CDRs at positions 26-35 (CDR1), 50-56
`(COR2) and94-100B (CDR3).
`In addition murine residues
`were used in gH341D at positions 24, 48, 69, 71, 73i 80,
`88 and 91.
`Comparison of the murine anti-ICAM 1 and
`human EU heavy chain amino acid sequences are identical at
`positions 23, 49 and 78.
`
`Board Assigned Page #742
`
`PFIZER EX. 1095
`Page 895
`
`

`

`W091/09967
`
`PCf/GB90/02017
`
`- 61 -
`
`EXAMPLE 5
`
`CDR-Grafting of murine anti-TNFa an t ibodies
`A number of murine anti-TNFa monoclonal antibodies were '
`CDR- grafted substantially as descri bed above in previous
`examples.
`These antibodies include t he murine monoclonal
`A
`antibodies designated 61 E71, hTNFl, hTNF3 and 1 01 .4
`brief summary of the CDR-grafting of each of these
`antibodies is given below.
`
`61E71
`A similar analysis as described above (Example 1, Section
`12.1.) was done for 61E7l and for the heavy chain 10
`residues were identified at 23, 24, 48, 49, 68, 69, 71,
`73, 75 and 88 as residues to pote ntially retain as
`murine.
`The human frameworks chosen for CDR-grafting of
`t his antibody, and the hTNF3 and 101.4 antibodies were REl
`for the light chain and KOL for the heavy chain .
`Three genes were built , the first of which contained 23,
`24, 48, 49, 71 and 73 [gH341( 6) ] as murine residues.
`The
`second gene also had 75 and 88 as murine residues
`[gH341(8)] while the third gene additionally had 68, 69,
`Each was
`75 and 88 as murine residues [gH341(10 )] .
`co- expressed with gL221, the minimum grafted light chain
`(CDRs only).
`The gL221/gH341(6) and gL221/gH341(8)
`a ntibodies both bound

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket