throbber
WO 91109967
`
`PCf/GB90/02017
`
`- 33 -
`
`region of the variable r egion from the Aval site
`and to include the 5 ' r esidues of the human
`constant region up to and including a unique Narl
`site which had been previously engineered into the
`constant region.
`A Bindlll site was introduced to act as a marker
`for insertion of the linker.
`The linker was ligated to the VL fraqment and the
`413 bp EcoRl-Narl adapted fraqme nt was puri f ied
`from the ligation mixture.
`The constant region was isolated as an Narl-BamHl
`fragment from an Ml3 clone NW361 and was ligated
`with the variable region DNA into a n
`EcoRl / BamHl / ClP pSP65 treated vector in a three
`way reaction t o yield plasmid J A143.
`Clones were
`isolated after transformation into E.coli and the
`linker and junction sequences were confirmed by
`the presence of the Hindlll site and by DNA
`sequencing.
`LIGHT CHAIN GENE CONSTRUCTION - VERSION 2
`The construction of the first chimeric light chain
`gene produces a fusion of mouse and human amino
`acid sequences at the variable-constant region
`junction.
`In the case of the OKT3 light chain
`the amino acids at the chimera junction are:
`• ••••••• Leu-Glu-Ile-~A~s~n_-~Ar~g~/ ____ -~/~T~h=r-val-Ala
`VARIABLE
`CONSTANT
`··-·- This arrangement of sequence introduces a
`potential site for Asparagine (Asn) linked
`(N-linked) glycosylation at the V-C junction.
`Therefore, a second version of the chimeric light
`chain oligonucleotide adapter was designed in
`which the threonine (Thr ) , the first amino acid of
`the human constant region, was replaced with the
`equivalent amino acid f rom the mouse constant
`region, Alanine (Ala).
`
`:rYS>'>)
`L$Q
`-Ala /1
`
`9.2
`
`, --·-···- -,--·- ·-
`
`,-, ,
`
`I
`
`Board Ass gned Page #306
`
`PFIZER EX. 1095
`Page 501
`
`

`

`wo 91/09967
`
`PCf/GB90/02017
`
`- 34 -
`
`i nc l uded i n this
`An internal Hindlll site was not
`adapter, to differentiate the two chimeric light
`chain genes.
`The variable region fragment was isolated as a 376
`bp EcoRl-Aval fragment.
`The oligonucleotide
`linker was ligated to Narl cut pNW361 and then the
`adapted 396bp constant region was isolated af ter
`recutting the modified pNW3 61 with EcoRl.
`The
`variable region fragment and the modified constant
`region fragment were ligated directly into
`EcoR l /ClP treated pEE6hCMVneo to yield pJA137.
`Initially all clones examined had the insert in
`Therefore, the insert
`the incorrect orientation.
`was re-isolated and recloned to turn the insert
`round and yield plasmid pJA141.
`Several clones
`with t he insert in the correct orientation were
`obtained and the adapter sequence of one was
`confirmed by DNA sequenc i ng
`HRAVY CHAIN GENE CONSTRUCTION
`9.3.
`9 .3. 1 . CHOICE OF HEAVY CHAIN GENE ISOTYPE
`The constant region isotype c hos en for the heavy
`chain was human IgG4.
`9.3.2. GENE CONSTRUCTION
`The heavy chain eDNA sequence showed a Banl site(seQ r::p I'JO'.o)
`near the 3' end of the variable region (Fig. 2(a)J.
`)1
`The majority of the sequence of the variable
`region was isolated as a 4 26bp. EcoRl/ClP/Banl
`fragment.
`An oligonucleotide adapter was
`designated to replace the remainder of the 3'
`region of the variable region from the Banl site
`up to and including a unique Hindiii site which
`had been previ ously engineered into t he first two
`amino a cids of the constant regio n.
`The linker was ligated to the VB fragment and the
`EcoRl-Hindlll adapted fragment was purified from
`the ligation mixture.
`
`\
`
`Board Ass gned Page #307
`
`PFIZER EX. 1095
`Page 502
`
`

`

`wo 91/09967
`
`PCf /GB90/02017
`
`- 35 -
`
`The variable r egion was ligated to the constant
`region by c utting pJA91 with EcoRl and Hindlll
`removing the intron fragment and replacing it with
`the VH to yield pJA142.
`Clones were isolated
`after transformation i nto E.coli JM101 and the
`linker and j unction sequences were confirmed by
`DNA sequencing.
`(N.B . The Hindlll site is lost
`on cloning) .
`
`CONSTRUCTION OF CHIMERI C EXPRESSION VECTORS
`neo AND gpt VECTORS
`The chimeric light chain {vers i on l) was removed
`from pJA14 3 a s an EcoRl fragment and cloned into
`EcoRl/ClP treated pEE6hCMVneo expression vector to
`yield pJA145.
`Clones with the insert in t he
`correct orientation were identified by restrict i on
`mapping.
`The chimeric light chain (version 2 ) was
`constructed a s described above.
`The chimeric heavy chain gene was isolated f r om
`pJA142 as a 2 .5Kbp EcoRl / BamHl f ragment and cloned
`into the EcoRl / Bcl l/ClP treated vector fragment of
`a derivative of pEE6hCMVgpt to yield plasmid
`pJA144.
`GS SEPARATE VECTORS
`GS versions of pJA14 1 and pJA144 were constructed
`by replacing the neo and gpt cassettes by a
`BamHl / Sall / ClP treatment o f the plasmids,
`isolation of the vector fragment and l igation to a
`GS-containing fragment from the plasmid pR049 to
`yield the light chain vector pJA179 and the heavy
`chain vector pJA180.
`GS SINGLE VECTOR CONSTRUCTION
`Single vector constructions containing the cL
`(chi meric l i ght), cH (chimeric heavy) and GS genes
`on one plasmid in the order cL-cH-GS, or cH-cL-GS
`
`10.
`10 .1.
`
`10.2.
`
`10.3.
`
`Board Ass gned Page #308
`
`PFIZER EX. 1095
`Page 503
`
`

`

`WO 91/09967
`
`PCf/GB90/02017
`
`11.
`11.1.
`
`- 36 -
`
`and with transcription of the genes being head to
`tail e.g. cL>cH>GS were constructed.
`These
`plasmids were made by treating pJA179 or pJA180
`with BamB1/C1P and ligating in a Bgl11/Hindl11
`hCMV promoter cassette along with either the
`Hind111/BamB1 fragment from pJA141 into pJA180 to
`give the cH-cL-GS plasmid pJA182 or the
`Hind111/BamHl fragment from pJA144 into pJA179 to
`give the cL-cH-GS plasmid pJA181.
`
`EXPRESSION OF CHIMERIC GENES
`EXPRESSION IN COS CELLS
`The chimeric antibody plasmid pJA14S (cL) and
`pJA144 (cH) were co-transfected into COS cells and
`supernatant from the transient expression
`experiment was shown to contain assembled antibody
`which bound to the HUT 78 human T-cell line.
`Metabolic labelling experiments using 35s
`methionine showed expression and assembly of heavy
`and light chains.
`However the light chain ·
`mobility seen on reduced gels suggested that the
`potential glycosylation site was being
`glycosylated.
`Expression in COS cells in the
`presence of tunicamycin showed a reduction in size
`of the light chain to that shown for control
`chimeric antibodies and the OKT3 mouse light
`chain.
`Therefore JA141 was constructed and
`In this case the light chain did not
`expressed.
`show an aberrant mobility or a size shift in the
`presence or absence of tunicamycin.
`This second
`version of the chimeric light chain, when
`expressed in association with chimeric heavy (cH)
`chain, produced antibody which showed good binding
`to HUT 78 cells.
`In both cases antigen binding
`was equivalent to that of the mouse antibody.
`
`Board Ass gned Page #309
`
`PFIZER EX. 1095
`Page 504
`
`

`

`wo 91/09967
`
`PCf/GB90/02017
`
`11.2
`
`12.
`
`12. 1.
`
`- 37 -
`
`EXPRESSION IN CHINESE HAMSTER OVARY (CHO) CELLS
`Stable cell lines have been prepared from plasmids
`PJA141 / pJAl44 and from pJA179/pJA180, pJA181 and
`pJA182 by transfection into CHO cells.
`
`CDR-GRAFTING
`The approach taken was to try to introduce
`sufficient mouse residues into a human variable
`region framework to generate ant igen binding
`activity comparable to the mouse and chimeric
`antibodies.
`VARIABLE REGION ANALYSIS
`From an examination of a small database of
`structures of antibodies and antigen-antibody
`complexes it is clear that only a small number of
`antibody residues make direct contact with
`antigen. Other residues may contribute to
`antigen binding by posit ioning the c ontact
`residues in favourable configurations and also by
`inducing a stable packing of the individual
`variable domains and stable interaction of the
`light and heavy chain variable domains .
`The residues chosen for transfer can be identified
`in a number of ways:
`(a)
`By examination of antibody X-ray crystal
`structures the antigen binding surface can
`be predominantly located on a series of
`loops, three per domain, which extend from
`the B-barrel framework.
`By analys i s of antibody variable domain
`sequences regions of hypervariability
`[termed the Complementarity Determining
`Regions (CDRs) by wu and Kabat (ref.· 5 )]
`can be identified.
`In the most but not
`all cases these CDRs correspond to, but
`extend a short way beyond, the loop regions
`noted above.
`
`(b)
`
`Board Assgned Page #310
`
`PFIZER EX. 1095
`Page 505
`
`

`

`wo 91/09967
`
`PCT/GB90/02017
`
`- 38 -
`
`(c )
`
`Residues not identified by ( a ) and (b) may
`contribute to antigen binding directly or
`indirectly by affecting antigen binding
`site topology, or by inducing a stable
`packing of the individual variable domains
`and stabilising the inter-variable domain
`interaction.
`These residues may be
`identified either by superimposing the
`sequences for a given antibody on a known
`structure and looking at key residues for
`their contribution, or by sequence
`alignment analysis and noting
`"idiosyncratic" residues followed by
`examination of their structural location
`and likely effects.
`12 • 1 . 1 . LIGHT CHA-GJb 4J;l NO~{b And "')
`Figure 3~shows an alignm1~~~~<ae~~ces for the
`human framework regio~~l and the OKTJ light
`l56:JW f\.Q'~t:
`It
`variable region.
`The
`ructural loops (LOOP) and
`A
`CDRs (KABAT ) believed to correspond to the antigen
`binding region are marked. Also marked are a
`number of other residues which may also contribute
`
`to antigen binding as described in 13.1~- ~J)
`(SE:Q J:O NQ:
`1 (Jr0
`'}
`Above the sequence in Figure 3A~he res~
`type
`indicates the spatial location of each residue
`side chain, derived by examination of resolved
`structures from X-ray crystallography analysis.
`The key to this residue type designation is as
`follows:
`N - near to CDR (From X-ray Structures)
`P - Packing
`B - Buried Non-Packing
`s
`Surface
`Exposed
`I -
`Interface
`Interface
`Packing/ Part Exposed
`? - Non-CDR Residues which may require to be left
`as Mouse sequence.
`
`E
`*
`
`Board Ass gned Page #311
`
`PFIZER EX. 1095
`Page 506
`
`

`

`

`

`WO 91/09967
`
`PCf /GB90/020 17
`
`12.3.
`
`- 40 -
`
`This sequence motif is
`sequence in the gene.
`believed to have a beneficial role in tran slation
`initiation in eukaryotes.
`GENE CONSTRUCTION
`To build the variable regions, various strategies
`are available.
`The sequence may be assembled by
`using oligonucleotides in a manner similar to
`Jones et al (ref. 17) or by simultaneously
`replacing all of the CDRs or loop regions by
`oligonucleotide directed site specific mutagenesis
`in a manner similar to Verhoeyen et al (ref. 2).
`Both strategies were used and a list of
`con structions is set out in Tables 1 and 2 and
`a-{-
`Figures 4 and 5.
`It was noted in several cases
`1\
`that the mutagenesis approach led to deletions and
`rearrangements in the gene being remodelled, while
`the success of the assembly approach was very
`sensitive to the quality of the oligonucleotides.
`
`13 .
`
`CONSTRUCTION OF EXPRESSION VECTORS
`Genes were isolated from Ml 3 or SP65 based
`intermediate vectors and cloned into pEE6hCMVneo
`for the light chains and pEE6hCMVgpt for the heavy
`chains in a manner similar to that for the
`chimeric genes as described above.
`
`Board Assgned Page #313
`
`PFIZER EX. 1095
`Page 508
`
`

`

`W091109967
`
`- 41 -
`
`PCT/GB90/02017
`
`TABLE 1
`CODE
`
`CDR-GRAFTED GENE CONSTRUCTS
`MOUSE SEQUENCE
`CONTENT
`
`METHOD OF
`CONSTRUCTION
`
`KOZAK
`SEQUENCE
`
`+
`
`121B
`
`221
`221A
`
`LIGHT CHAIN
`ALL HUMAN FRAMEWORK REl
`121
`26-32, 50-56. 91-96 inclusive
`l21A
`26-32 , 50-56, 91-96 inclusive
`+1, 3. 46. 47
`26-32, 50-56, 91 - 96 inclusive
`+ 46, 47
`24 -24 , 50-56, 91-96 inclusive
`24-34 , 50-56, 91- 96 inclusive
`+1, 3, 46, 47
`24-34, 50- 56 , 91 - 96 inclusive
`+1. 3
`24-34, 50-56, 91-96 inclusive
`
`221B
`
`221C
`
`HEAVY CHAIN
`ALL HUMAN FRAMEWORK KOL
`121
`26-32, 50·56, 95 -lOOB inclusive
`131
`26- 32, 50-58, 95- l OOB inclusive
`141
`26 - 32, 50·65, 95-lOOB inclusive
`321
`26- 35, 50·56 , 95- l OOB inclusive
`331
`26-35, 50-58, 95-lOOB inclusive
`
`341
`
`26-35 , 50· 65, 95-lOOB inclusive
`
`341A
`
`341B
`
`26-35 , 50-65, 95-lOOB inclusive
`+6, 23 , 24, 48 , 49, 71, 73, 76,
`
`(~8~8~~ 9~\+-t:-u--ruman)
`26-35, 50-65 , 95- l OOB inclusive
`+ 48 , 49, 71, 73, 76, 78, 88, 91
`(+63 + human)
`
`SDM and gene
`Partial gene
`
`assembly
`assembly
`
`n . d.
`+
`n.d. +
`
`Parcial gene assembly
`
`n.d. +
`
`Parcial gene assembly
`Parci al gene assembly
`
`Parcial gene assembly
`
`+
`
`+
`
`+
`
`Par tial gene assembly
`
`+
`
`+
`+
`
`+
`
`+
`
`Gene assembly
`Gene assembly
`Partial gene assembly
`Parcial gene assemb l y
`Partial gene assembly
`Gene assembly
`SOH
`Par tial gene assembly
`Gene assembly
`
`n.d . +
`n . d. +
`n.d.
`+
`n. d .
`+
`+
`
`+
`
`+
`
`+
`n.d .· +
`
`Gene as sembly
`
`n.d. +
`
`KEY
`n .d .
`SDM
`Gene assembly
`Parcial gene
`assembly
`
`not done
`Site directed mutagenesis
`Variabl e region assembled entirely f r om oligonucl eotides
`Variabl e region assembled by combination of restriction
`fragments either from ocher genes ori ginally created by SDM
`and gene assembly or by ol i gonucleotide assembly of pare of
`the variable region and reconstruction with restriction
`fragments from other genes originally created by SDM and gene
`assembly
`
`-- ---
`
`Board Ass gned Page #314
`
`PFIZER EX. 1095
`Page 509
`
`

`

`wo 91/09967
`
`PCT/GB90/02017
`
`14.
`14 .1.
`
`- 42 -
`
`EXPRESSION OF CDR-GRAFTED GENES
`PRODUCTION OF ANTIBODY CONSISTING OF GRAFTED LIGHT
`(gL) CHAINS WITH MOUSE HEAVY (mH) OR CHIMERIC
`HEAVY (cH) CHAINS
`All gL chains, in association with mH or cH
`produced reasonable amounts of antibody.
`Insertion of the Kozak consensus sequence at a
`position 5' to the ATG (kgL constructs) however,
`led to a 2-5 fold improvement in net expression.
`Over an extended series of experiments expression
`levels were raised from approximately 200ng/ml to
`approximately 500 ng/ml for kgL/cH or kgL/mH
`combinations.
`When direct binding to antigen on HUT 78 cells was
`measured, a construct designed to include mouse
`sequence based on loop length (gL121) did not lead
`to active antibody in association with mB or cH.
`A construct designed to include mouse s~quence
`r .::.o r:o NO·.?.D_
`based on Kabat CDRs ( gL221 ~'demonstrated some weak
`binding in association with mH or cH.
`However,
`when framework residues 1, 3, 46, 47 were changed
`from the human to the murine OKT3 equivalents
`based on the arguments outlined in Section 12.1
`antigen binding was demonstrated when both of the
`new constructs, which were termed 121A and 221A
`were co-expressed with cH. When the effects of
`these residues were examined in more detail, it
`appears that residues 1 and 3 are not major
`contr~uting r7ftdues as the product of the gL221B
`cs h -:til w:.t,_ 1 d
`bl b · d ·

`· t

`geneAs ows li t e etecta e ~n ~ng act~v~ y ~n
`association wit~ ~H.
`The l ight chain product of
`~~t:-U ~\) ND.Z$
`gL221~, in wbich ouse sequences are present at 46
`and 47, shows good binding activity in association
`with cH.
`
`I -·~
`
`Board Ass gned Page #315
`
`PFIZER EX. 1095
`Page 510
`
`

`

`W091/09967
`
`PCf/GB90/02017
`
`14. 2
`
`- 43 -
`
`PRODUCTION OF ANTIBODY CONSISTING OF GRAFTED HEAVY
`( gH) CHAINS WIT~ MOUSE LIGHT
`( rnL ) OR CHIMERI C
`LIGHT (cL ) CHAINS
`Expression of .the gH genes proved to be more
`difficult to achieve than f o r gL.
`First,
`inclusion of the Kozak sequence appeared to have
`no marked effect on expressio n of gH genes.
`Expression appears to be slightly improved but not
`to the same degree as seen f o r the grafted light
`chain.
`Also, it p~oved difficult to demonstrate
`production of expected quantities of material when
`the loop choice (amino acid 26-3 2) f or CDRl is
`used, e.g. 9H121, 131, 141 and . no conclusions can
`~ :r)) NO: 11)
`be drawn about these constructs.
`Moreover, co~expressio n of the gH341 gene~ with cL
`o r mL has been variable and has tended to produce
`l ower amounts of antibody than the cH/cL o r mH/mL
`)
`( $6Q I.b NO'. I I
`.
`,
`.
`comb1.nat1.ons .
`The al t..erat,Lo.ns to gH~ l.A t o
`f"~-s;:,>~:l'l;-1 L~J:(,.(, ~.() \'IU5<2.J ) ....
`produce gH34l~ana gH341B lead t o ~mproved level s
`1\
`A
`of expression.
`This may be due either to a general increase in
`the fraction of mouse sequence in the variable
`region, or to the alteration at position 63 where
`the residue is returned to the human amino acid
`Valine (Val) from Phenylalanine (Phe) to avoid
`possible internal packing prob l ems with the rest
`of the human framework.
`This arrangement also
`occurs in gH331 and gH32 1.
`When gH321 or gH331 were expr e s sed i n association
`with cL, ant i body was produced but a n tib ody
`( '5\!0- ~ ~Oi !1)
`binding act i vity was not detected.
`When the more c onservative gB34 1 geneAwas u~ed
`antigen binding could be detected i n association
`with cL or rnL, but the activity was only
`marginally above the background level.
`
`f
`
`•
`
`'
`•
`
`Board Ass gned Page #316
`
`PFIZER EX. 1095
`Page 511
`
`

`

`wo 91/09967
`
`PCf/GB90/02017
`
`14.3
`
`- 44 -
`
`When f urther mouse residues were substituted based
`on the arguments in 12.1, antigen binding could be
`clearly demonstrated for the antibody produced
`when kgB341A and kgB341B were expresse d in
`association with cL.
`PRODUCTION OF FULLY CDR-GRAFTED ANTIBODY
`The kgL221A gene was co-expressed wit h kgH341,
`kgH341A or kgH341B.
`For the combination
`kgH221A/ kgH341 very lit t l e mat erial was produced
`in a normal COS c e l l expression.
`For the combinations kgL221A/ kgH341A or
`kgH221A/ kgH341B amounts of antibody s imil ar t o
`gL/ cH was produced.
`In several experiments no antigen binding activi t y
`coul d be detected with kgB221A/ gH341 or
`kgH221A/ kgH341 combinations , a l though expression
`levels were very low.
`Ant igen binding was de t ec t ed when kgL221A/ kgH341A
`or kgH221A/ kgH341B combinations were expressed.
`In the case of the antibody produced from the
`kgL221A/kgH341A combination the antigen binding
`was very similar to that of the chimeric antibody.
`
`An analysis of the above results is given bel ow.
`
`15.
`
`DISCUSSION OF CDR-GRAFTING RESULTS
`I n the design of the ful l y humanised antibody the
`aim was t o transfer the minimum number of mouse
`amino acids that would confer ant igen binding onto
`a human antibody framework.
`LIGHT CHAIN
`15 . 1.
`15.1.1. EXTENT OF THE CDRs
`For the l ight c hain the regions defining the loops
`known from structural studies of other antibodies
`to contain t he antigen cont acting residues, and
`
`f • /
`
`Board Ass gned Page #317
`
`PFIZER EX. 1095
`Page 512
`
`

`

`W09l/09967
`
`PCf/G 890/02017
`
`- 45 -
`
`those hypervariable sequences defined by Kabat ~
`al (refs. 4 and 5 ) as Complementarity Determining
`Regions ( CDRs) are equivalent for CDR2 .
`For CDR!
`the hypervariable region extends from residues
`:1
`24-34 inclusive while the structural l oop extends
`(.)~Q .I'D Y'«)S;
`from 26-32 inclusive.
`In the case of OKT3Athere
`is only one amino acid difference between the two
`options, at amino acid 24, where the mouse
`sequence is a serine and the human framework REl
`has glutamine.
`For CDR3 the loop extends from
`residues 91-96 inclusive while the Kabat
`;q
`hypervariability extends from residues 89-97
`inclusive.
`For 0KT3 amino acids 89, 90 and 97 . N" 'b~rJ9
`{SEQ t:-D
`v_:,..
`/
`are the same between OKT3 and REl (Fig. 3~; When
`constructs based on the l oop choice for CDRl
`{gL12l) and the Kabat choice (gL221) were made and
`co-expressed with mH or cH no evidence for antigen
`binding activity could be found for gL121, but
`trace activity could be detected for the gL221,
`suggesting that a single extra mouse residue in
`the grafted variable region could have some
`detectable effect.
`Both gene constructs were
`reasonably well expressed in the transient
`expression system.
`15.1.2. FRAMEWORK RESIDUES
`The remaining framework residues were then further
`examined, in particular amino acids known from
`X-ray analysis of other an t ibodies to be close to
`the CDRs and also those amino acids which in OKT3
`showed differences from the consensus framework
`for the mouse subgroup (subgroup VI) to which 0KT3
`shows most homo logy.
`Four positions 1, 3 , 46 and
`47 were identified and their possible contribution
`was examined by substituting the mouse amino acid
`for the human amino acid at each position.
`Therefore gL221A (gL221 + DlQ, Q3V, L46R, L47W,
`
`I /
`
`Board Assgned Page #318
`
`PFIZER EX. 1095
`Page 513
`
`

`

`wo 91/09967
`
`PCT/GB90/020J 7
`
`- 46 -
`
`see Figure 3 and Ta bl e 1) was made, cloned in
`EE6hCMVneo and co-expressed with cH (pJA144). The
`resultant antibody was wel l expressed and showed
`good bindi9q activity . When the related genes
`l)fD .).."<;:!
`['ol~·.t..~l
`gL221BA( gL221 + DlQ, Q3V) and gL221C (gL221 +
`L46R, L47W) were made and similarly tested, while
`bot h genes produced antibody when co-expressed
`with cH, only the gL221C / c.H combination showed
`good antigen binding. When the gL121A (gL121 +
`Dl Q, Q3V, L46R, L47W) gene was made and
`c o-expressed with cH, antibody was produced which
`also bound to antigen.
`HEAVY CHAIN
`15.2.
`15. 2.1. EXTENT OF THE CDRs
`For the heavy chain the loop and hypervariability
`analyses agree only in CDR3 .
`For CDRl t he loop
`region extends from residues 26-32 inclusive
`whereas the Kabat CDR e xtends from residues 31-35
`inclusive.
`For CDR2 the loop regi on is from
`S0- 58 inclusive while the hypervariable r e gion
`c overs amino acids 50-65 incl usive.
`Therefore
`humanised heavy chains were construc ted us ing the
`framework from antibody KOL and with various
`c ombinations of these CDR choices, including a
`shorter choice for CDR2 of S0-56 inclusive as
`there was some uncertainty as to the definition of
`the end point for the CDR2 loop around residues 56
`to 58 .
`The genes were co-expressed with mL or cL
`initially.
`In the case of the gH genes with loop
`choices for CDRl e.g. gH121, gH131, gB141 very
`little antibody was produced in the culture
`s upernatants.
`As no free light chain was
`detected it was presumed that the antibody was
`being made and assembled inside the cell but that
`the heavy chain was aberrant in some way, possibly
`incorrectly folded, and t herefore the antibody was
`
`Board Assigned Page #319
`
`PFIZER EX. 1095
`Page 514
`
`

`

`wo 91 /09967
`
`PCT/GB90/02017
`
`- 47 -
`
`In some experiments
`being degraded internally.
`trace amoun~s of antibody could be detected in 35s
`labelling studies.
`As no net antibody was produced, analysis of t hese
`constructs was not pursued further.
`When, however, a combination of the loop choice -
`and the Kabat choice for CDRl was t e sted (mouse
`amino acids 26-35 i nc lusive) and in which residues
`31 (Ser to Arg ) , 33 {Ala to Thr ) , and 35 (Tyr to
`His) were changed f rom the human residues t o the
`mouse residue and c ompared to the first series,
`antibody was produced f or gH321, kgH33 1 and kgH341
`Expression was
`when co-expressed wi th cL.
`generally low and could not be markedly improved
`by the insertion of the Kozak consensus sequence
`5 ' to t he ATG of the s i gnal sequence of t he gene,
`as distinct from the case of the gL genes where
`such insert ion led to a 2-5 fold increase in net
`However, only in the case
`antibody production.
`of gH341 / mL or kgH341/cL could marginal antigen
`binding activity be demonstrated. When tg~ 'J.."\:1 1-JD'. 2. ~
`kgH341 gene was co-expressed with kgL221~ the net
`yield of antibody was t oo low to give a signal
`above the background level in the antigen binding
`assay.
`15.2.2. FRAMEWORK RESIDUES
`As in the case of the light chain the heavy chain
`frameworks were re-examined.
`Possibly because of
`the lower initial homology between the mouse and
`human heavy variable domains compared to the light
`chains, more amino acid positions proved to be of
`interest.
`Two genes kgH341A and kgH341B were
`constructed, with 11 or 8 human residues
`respecti vel y substitut ed by mouse residues
`compared to gH341, and with the CDR2 residue 63
`returned to the human amino acid potentially to
`
`Board Assigned Page #320
`
`PFIZER EX. 1095
`Page 515
`
`

`

`wo 91/09967
`
`PCf/GB90/02017 ·
`
`1 5. 3
`
`- 48 -
`
`Both showed antigen
`improve domain packing.
`binding when combined with cL or kgL2 21A , the
`kgH3 4 1A gene with all 11 changes appearing to be
`the superior choice.
`INTERIM CONCLUSIONS
`It has been demonstrated, therefore, for 0KT3 that
`to transfer antigen binding ability to the
`humanised antibody, mouse residues outside the CDR
`regions defined by the Kabat hypervariability or
`structural loop choices are required for both the
`light and heavy chains.
`Fewer e xtra residues are
`needed for the light chain, possibly due to the
`higher initial homology between the mouse and
`human kappa variab le regions~
`Of the . changes seven (1 a nd 3 from the light chain
`and 6 , 23, 71 , 73 and 76 from the heavy chain ) are
`predicted from a know l edge of other antibody
`structures t o be eit her partly exposed or on t he
`antibody surface.
`It has been shown here that
`residues 1 and 3 in the light chain are not
`absolutely required to be the mouse sequence;
`for the heavy chain the gH341B heavy c hain in
`combination with the 221A light chain generated
`only weak binding activity.
`Therefore the
`presence of the 6, 23 and 24 changes are important
`to maintain a binding affinity similar to that of
`the murine antibody.
`It was important,
`therefore, to further study the individual
`contribution of othe other 8 mouse residues of the
`kgH341A gene compared to kgH341.
`
`and
`
`16.
`
`FURTHER CDR-GRAFTING EXPERIMENTS
`Additional . CDR-grafted heavy chain genes were
`prepared substantially as described above. With
`reference to Table 2 the further heavy chain genes
`were based upon the gh341 ( plasmid pJAl 78) and
`
`Board Assigned Page #321
`
`PFIZER EX. 1095
`Page 516
`
`

`

`wo 91/09967
`
`PCf/GB90/02017
`
`. (J--'
`~'0· 'l
`
`- 49 -
`c.:;8Q '(_\)
`gH341A (pl asm~d pJA185 ~ wi th either mouse OKT3 or
`human KOL res~dues at _6 , 23 , 24 , 48, 4 9, 63, 71,
`The CDR(cid:173)
`73, 76, 78, 88 and 91, as indicate d.
`grafted light c hain g~nes us~d in these furthef
`(~:fDI'JV.i
`lSEQl>PNO:tb ) l~E:Q:COND:Zt> )~'l"J>!IO: Z!7
`experiments were gL22~ , gL221~ gL22 1BAand gL221~
`as described above.
`
`Board Assigned Page #322
`
`PFIZER EX. 1095
`Page 517
`
`

`

`PCT / GB90/02017
`
`wo 91/09967
`
`TA@LE 2
`
`OKT3 HEAVY CHAI N CDR GRAFTS
`
`l.
`
`gH34l and derivatives
`
`- 50 -
`
`24 . 48 . 49
`A
`G
`I
`v
`s
`I
`A
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`23
`K
`s
`K
`
`K
`
`K
`
`K
`
`K
`
`RES 1NUM
`OKT3vh
`gHJ4l
`gH341A
`gH34lE
`gH34l*
`gHJ41*
`gH341D
`gH341*
`gH34_1C
`gHJ4 l *
`gH341*
`gH34l.B
`gH341*
`gH34l*
`
`A
`
`A
`
`A
`
`A
`
`I
`v
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`A
`A
`A
`
`A
`s
`
`A
`A
`
`gH341"*
`KOL
`(_pf-'Q ·t:-v
`OKTJ LIGHT CHAIN CDR GRAITS
`
`~6
`
`6
`g
`E
`g
`g
`g
`g
`g
`g
`K
`g
`K
`g
`s
`s
`E
`s
`E
`g
`s
`s
`E
`I
`g
`s
`I
`A
`v
`s
`s
`E
`f'.lO: ?f: ID Oild l! - t+)
`';0
`
`63
`
`F
`
`F
`v
`v
`v
`v
`v
`v
`F
`v
`v
`v
`v
`v
`v
`
`7l
`T
`R
`T
`T
`T
`R
`T
`R
`
`R
`T
`T
`
`T
`T
`T
`T
`R
`
`73
`K
`
`N
`
`K
`
`K
`
`K
`
`N
`
`K
`
`N
`
`N
`
`K
`
`K
`
`K
`K
`
`K
`K
`
`N
`
`76
`s
`N
`s
`s
`N
`N
`
`N
`
`N
`N
`s
`s
`s
`s
`s
`N
`
`N
`
`78
`
`A
`L
`
`A
`
`A
`
`A
`A
`L
`
`L
`
`L
`
`A
`
`A
`A
`
`A
`
`A
`
`A
`L
`
`88
`A
`G
`
`A
`G
`
`G
`G
`
`G
`
`G
`G
`A
`
`A
`
`A
`
`G
`G
`G
`G
`
`91
`y
`
`F JA178
`Y JA185
`G JA198-..._
`F JA207-=-
`F JA209
`F JA197
`F JA199
`F JA184
`Y JA203
`Y JA205
`Y J A183
`F JA204
`F J A206
`F JA208
`F
`
`A
`G
`G
`
`G
`
`G
`
`G
`
`G
`A
`G
`
`G
`
`G
`
`G
`
`G
`G
`
`A
`
`2.
`
`gL221 and derivatives
`
`RES ~ l
`g
`OKT3vl
`GL221
`D
`g
`gL2 21A
`g
`gU21B
`GL2 21C
`D
`REl
`
`D
`
`46
`
`47
`
`3
`v
`R
`\.l
`L DA221
`L
`Q
`v
`R W 0A221A
`v
`L
`L DA221B
`t.J DA221C
`R
`Q
`Q !).q L
`L
`
`MURINE RESIDUES ARE UNDERLINED
`
`~ ~ lo£Q ~\) ~o·. %\~ l q &fe\ 'ltD,.. n)
`
`------~
`
`Board Assigned Page #323
`
`PFIZER EX. 1095
`Page 518
`
`

`

`WO 91109967
`
`PCf/GB90/02017
`
`- 51 -
`
`The CDR- grafted heavy and light chain genes were
`co-expressed in COS cells e i ther wit h one another in
`various combinations but also with the corresponding
`murine and chimeric heavy and light chain genes
`substantially as described above.
`The resultant antibody
`products were then assayed in binding and blocking assays
`with BPB-ALL cells as described above.
`
`The results of the assays for various graftgd heavy ~ains
`_f'i:> tc.Q 4=D NU : t~/
`co-expressed with the gL22lC light chai ,~are given in
`Figures 7 and 8 (for the JA184, JA185, JA197 and JA198
`constructs - see Table 2), in Figure 9 (for the JALB~,
`CJ. ~na b
`JA184, JA185 and JA197 constructs) i n Figure 10 (for the
`II
`chimeric, JA185, JA199, JA204, JA2051.~\A207, J A208 and
`JA209 constructs) and in Figure ll;(for the JA183, JA184,
`JA185, JAl98, JA203, JA205 and J A206 co nstructs).
`
`.
`The basic grafted product without any human to murine
`~J
`221(2F..R 4--D NQ.W;


`k

`
`h c anges 1.n the varl.able framewor s, 1..e. ) gL
`.11
`[sro :tP IXb • \ I
`/ '
`co-expressed with gh341 (JA1 78~, and also the "fully
`grafted" product, having most human to murine changes in )
`tsEO :1-0 N.IY. 2..8
`.
`the grafted heavy chain framework , 1..e. gL22lCA
`cswn ~0: 1'2.)
`co-expressed with gh341A (JAlBS~, were assayed for
`relative binding affinity in a competition assay against
`murine OKT3 reference standard, using HPB-ALL cells.
`The
`assay used was as described above in section 3.3.
`The
`results obtained are given in Figure 12 for the basic
`grafted product and in Figure 13 for the fully grafted
`product .
`These results indicate that the basic grafted
`product has neglibible binding abil ity as compared with
`the OKT3 murine reference standard; whereas the "fully
`grafted" product has a binding ability very similar to
`that of the OKT3 murine reference standard.
`
`The binding and blocking assay results indicate the
`following:
`
`Board Assigned Page #324
`
`PFIZER EX. 1095
`Page 519
`
`

`

`wo 91/01)967
`
`PCf/GB?0/02017
`
`- 52 -
`
`The JA198 and JA207 constructs appear to have the best
`binding characteristics and similar binding abilit ies,
`both substantially the same as the chimeric and fully
`grafted gH341A products.
`This indicates that positions
`88 and 91 and position 76 are not highly critical for
`maintaining the OKT3 binding ability; whereas at least
`some of positions 6, 23, 24, 48, 49, 71, 73 and 78 are
`more important.
`
`This is borne out by the finding that the JA20 9 and JA199,
`alt hough of similar binding ability to one anot her, are of
`lower binding ability than the JA198 and JA207
`const ructs.
`This indicates t he import ance of having
`mouse residues at positions 71, 73 and 78, which are
`either completely or parti a l ly human in the JA199 and
`JA209 constructs respectively.
`
`Moreover, on comparing the results obtained for the JA205
`and JA183 constructs it is seen that there is a decrease
`in binding going from the JA2 05 to the JA183 const ructs.
`This indicates the import ance of retaining a mouse residue
`at position 23, the only position changed between JA205
`and JA163.
`
`These and other r e sults lead us t o the conclusion that of
`the 11 mouse framework residues used in the gH341A (JA185 )
`construct, it is import ant to retain mouse residues at all
`of positions 6, 23, 24, 48 and 49, and possibly for
`maximum binding affinit y a t 71, 73 and 76.
`
`Similar Experiments were carried out to CDR-graft a number
`of the rodent antibodies including antibodies having
`specificity for CD4
`(OKT4), ICAM-1 (R6-5 ) , TAG72 (B72.3),
`and TNF~( 6 1E71, 101.4, hTNFl, hTNF2 and hTNF3).
`
`Board Assigned Page #325
`
`PFIZER EX. 1095
`Page 520
`
`

`

`wo 91/09967
`
`PCT/ GB90/0l0 17
`
`- 53 -
`
`EXAMPLE 2
`
`CDR-GRAFTING OF A MURINE ANTI-CD4 T CELL
`RECEPTOR ANTIBODY, OKT4A
`Anti OKT4A CDR-grafted heavy and light chain genes were
`prepared, expressed and tested substantially as described
`above in Example 1 for CDR-grafted OKT3.
`The CDR
`grafting of OKT4A is described in detail in Ortho patent
`application PCT/GB 90 .•••••••• of even date herewith
`entitled "Bwnanised Antibodies ".
`The disclosure of this
`Ortho patent application PCT/GB 90 ··••.••• • • • is
`incorporated herein by reference. A number of
`CDR-grafted OKT4 antibodies have been prepared.
`Presently the ·CDR-graf ted OKT4A of choice is the
`combination of the grafted light chain LCDR2 and the
`grafted heavy chain HCDR10.
`
`THE LIGHT CHAIN
`The human acceptor fr~e~o[k used for the grafted light
`.
`0'S p ~: ~o..ro ~
`chains was REJ,\-
`The pref rred LCDR2 light chain has
`human to mouse changes at positions 33, 34, 38, 49 and 89
`in addition to the structural loop CDRs.
`Of these
`changed positions, positions 33, 34 and 89 fall within the
`preferred extended CDRs of the present invention
`(positions 33 and 34 in CDRl and position 89 in CDR3).
`The human to murine changes at positions 38 and 49
`corresponds to positions at which the amino acid residu

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket