throbber
MARCH 1991 VOLMNO 3
`
`::c
`~
`,-
`--I
`::c
`
`"J:."
`"'~:"
`;A.
`
`(/)
`~
`r-n
`:z
`~ c->
`rr•
`_.
`(/)
`.-
`w
`en
`<..!)
`__.
`::::0
`:;J;.>
`::::0 -<
`
`URNAL OF
`I/CLINICAL
`PATHOLOGY
`
`BRITISH MEDICAL ASSOCIATION TAVlSTOCK SQUARE LONDON WClH 91R
`
`The journal of the Association of Clinical Pathologists
`
`in situ hybridisation in perspective A War/0rd, l Lauder
`Opportunistic protozoan infections in human immunodeficiency virus disease: Review highlighting
`diagnostic and therapeutic aspects A Curry, A J Turner. S Luca:
`.
`
`liistopathoioly and lmmunohistochemistry of the caecum in children with the Trich dysentery
`syndrome T T MacDonald. M-Y Chay. .I Spencer, 2: al
`
`lmmunohlstological characterisation of amyloid deposits
`C Hartley, J McClure, P Acktill
`
`renal biopsy specimens R J Pita-nitrite,
`
`Occult papillary mlcrocorcinoms of the thyroid — a potential pitfall of line needle aspiration
`cytology? H R Harach. E Saraw'a Day, S B Zunnan
`
`[Ki-67 staining in histological subtypes of breast carcinomn and fine needle aspiration smears
`V KWmamenn, Ti: H Van Der Kmart, H A J Van Laarhooen, S C Hem-Lopnam
`c-erbB-Z expression in different histological types of invasive breast carcinoma S Soomm, S Shouxlaa,
`P Taylor, H M Shepard. M Ftldmarnl
`DNA flow cytometry of follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma J C Macanney, R S Camplqohn, R Mom's.
`K Hollowaod. D Clarke, A Timothy
`
`Histometric studies on cellular infiltrates of tuberculin tests in patients with sareoidoais J G Lane,
`I H Gibbs, R C Putts. J L Stanford, J Swanson Beck
`
`Monocyte counting: Discrepancies in results obtained with diflerent automated instruments
`W Gama", L van Hove. R L Vn'wilghcn
`
`Measurement of acute phaae proteins for assessing severity of Plasmodium falciparum malaria
`S H Gillupit, C Bow, 1 G Rayner, R H Bohnm, P L Chabdml'. K P W} McAdam
`
`Plasma leucocyte elastaae concentrations in smokers C R K Hind, H Joyce, G A Tommi. M B Pepys.
`N B Pride
`
`Measurement of alkaline phosphatase of intestinal origin in plasma by P-bromotetramiaole
`inhibition T Karma, 8 B Rosalhi
`.
`
`Automated microparticie enzyme immunoassaya for 1:6 and 13M antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii‘
`J W Safimi, G 6 Abbott. M C Craim. R G MacDonald
`
`Plasma histamine in patients with chronic renal failure and nephrotic syndrome D S Gill,
`VA Fomeca. M A Barradal, R Balliod, J F Maorhtad, l’ Damiano
`
`Lack of specificity for antibodies to double stranded DNA found in four commercial kits
`M Kadinbomki, M Jackson, P L Yap, G Neill
`
`lmmnnocytologleal diagnosis of primary cerebral non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma A P Lax, A S Wurzbl'cb,
`P M Norman
`-
`
`Primary squamous cell carcinoma ofthe terminal ileum C C Plan. N Y Haboubu. P F Schofield
`
`Cells containing factor Xllla and pulmonary fibrosis induced by bleomyein M Taido. Y Charm],
`1‘ TM
`
`Audit of turnaround timoa in a microbiology laboratory S Rogers, M J Bywatn, D 5 Rune:
`Comparative yield of Salmonella typhi from blood and bone marrow cultures in patients with fever
`of unknown origin 8 J Far-Maui, M Khurshl'd, M K Alhqu. M Am KIran
`
`Recovery of CD3 + andCDS — lymphocyte subpopulatlon after autologous bone marrow
`transplantation and chunotherapy P J McKay, A McLaren. L M Andrew, N P Lucie
`
`202 Correspondence'Boohrevier'Noticea'
`
`PFIZER EX. 1089
`Page 1
`
`

`

`JOURNAL OF
`CLINICAL
`PATHOLOGY
`
`TM Journal of tht Association of Clinical Patlw/ogisu
`
`EDITORIAL
`BOARD
`
`Editor: John Lilleyman
`Deputy Editor: David Lowe
`Technical Editor: Caroline White
`Editorial Assistant: Mavis Burrell
`
`DR Davies
`AJ Bellingham
`PD Dawkins
`AJ Bint
`A Fleck
`A W Boylston
`J Gough
`D Catovsky
`and the Editor, British Medical Journal
`
`EGowland
`MRHaeney
`PG Isaacson
`FDLee
`
`DY Mason
`JO'DMcGee
`GLRidgway
`G Slavin
`
`JD Sleigh
`JPO'Shea
`DR Turner
`DL Williams
`DA Winfield
`
`Former Editors
`
`AG Signy 1944-72 HEM Kay 1972-80 G Slavin 1978-88
`
`Association of
`Clinical Pathologists
`
`President : NK Shinton President-Elect: G Slavin Vice-Presidents: CB Hobbs, FD Lee
`Honorary Officers: WR Timperley (Chairman of Council), DM Harris, (Secretary), AC Ames (Treasurer)
`General Secretary: Mrs JS Turner
`Address: The University of Sussex, School of Biological Sciences, Falmer, Brighton BNl 9QG; Tel (0273) 678435/6
`
`Information for Authors
`
`Papers should be sent in duplicate to the Editors,
`Journal of Clinical Pathology, BMA House, Tavistock
`Square, London WClH 9JR. They should be type(cid:173)
`written with double spacing on one side of the paper
`only. The names of the authors with initials or one
`forename should be followed by the name of the
`institution where the work was performed. An indica(cid:173)
`tion of the position held by each author must be given in
`an accompanying letter to the Editors, and this should
`include the signatures of all authors on papers with joint
`authorship. Guidelines on authorship are detailed in J
`Clin Patholl986;39: 110. Results should not be shown as
`both tables and graphs, and histograms should not be
`used.
`
`ARTICLES Articles should usually be no more than 2000
`words long and should report original research of
`relevance to the understanding and practice of clinical
`pathology. They should be written in the standard form:
`a summary (maximum 200 words) saying what was done
`and why, what was found, and what was concluded; an
`introduction; material and methods; results; and discus(cid:173)
`sion. Single case reports of outstanding interest or
`clinical relevance are welcomed, and are usually pub(cid:173)
`lished as indexed letters. Letters to the Editor should be
`of not more than 500 words with no more than five
`references and one figure or table.
`
`ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT A stamped addressed
`postcard should be enclosed for return to the author as
`acknowledgment of receipt of the manuscript. Overseas
`authors should enclose
`international
`reply paid
`coupons.
`
`ETHICS The critical assessment of papers submitted
`will include ethical considerations.
`
`reproduced
`should be
`ILLUSTRATIONS Diagrams
`photographically. The legends for illustrations should
`be typed with double spacing on a separate sheet.
`Photographs and photomiCrographs should be of high
`quality in full tonal scale on glossy paper, and un(cid:173)
`mounted. Only salient detail should be included, and
`prints should be no larger than 19 em without margins.
`
`Published by British Medical
`Association, Tavistock
`Square, London WClH 9JR
`and printed in England by
`Eyre & Spottiswoode Ltd,
`London and Margate
`
`ABBREVIATIONS Abbreviations must be spelt out on
`first use or be accompanied by explanation in the text.
`The use of non-standard abbreviations and acronyms
`should be avoided.
`
`Symbols and abbreviations should be in the Vancouver
`style.
`
`UNITS All measurements should be given in SI units.
`
`REFERENCES The references must be given in the
`Vancouver style.
`
`REPRINTS These may be ordered when the proof is
`returned. Prices for large numbers of reprints available
`on request.
`
`for advert(cid:173)
`NOTICE TO ADVERTISERS Applications
`isement space and for rates should be addressed to the
`Advertisement Manager, Journal of Clinical Pathology,
`BMA House, Tavistock Square, London WClH 9JR.
`
`The Journal of Clinical Pathology is published monthly.
`The annual subscription rates are £137.00 inland and
`£146.00 overseas; USA $250.00. Orders should be sent
`to The Subscription Manager, Journal of Clinical
`Pathology, BMA House, Tavistock Square, London
`WClH 9JR. Subscribers may pay for their subscrip(cid:173)
`tions by Access, Visa, or American Express, by quoting
`on their order the credit or charge card preferred,
`together with the appropriate personal account number
`and expiry date of the card. Orders can also be placed
`with any leading subscription agent or bookseller. (For
`the convenience of readers in the USA subscription
`orders, with or without payment, may also be sent to the
`British Medical Journal, Box 560B, Kennebunkport,
`Maine 04046, USA. All enquiries, however, must be
`addressed to the publisher in London.) All enquiries
`regarding air mail rates and single copies already
`published should be addressed to the publisher in
`London.
`COPYRIGHT © 1991 Journal of Clinical Pathology. This
`publication is copyright under the Berne Convention
`and the International Copyright Convention. All rights
`reserved. Apart from any relaxations permitted under
`national copyright laws, no part of this publication may
`be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmit(cid:173)
`ted in any form or by any means without the prior
`permission of the copyright owners. Permission is not,
`however, required to copy abstracts of papers or of
`articles on condition that a full reference to the source is
`shown. Multiple copying of the contents of the publica(cid:173)
`tion without permission is always illegal.
`
`Second class postage paid, at Rahway N.J. Postmaster to
`send address changes to: Journal of Clinical Pathology
`cfo Mercury Airfreight International Ltd. Inc., 2323
`Randolph Avenue, Avenel, NJ 07001, USA.
`ASTM CODEN:JCPAAK 44(3) 177-264 (1991)
`ISSN 0021-9746
`
`PFIZER EX. 1089
`Page 2
`
`

`

`1 Clin Patholl99l;44:2ll-2l4
`
`211
`
`c-erbB-2 expression in different histological types
`of invasive breast carcinoma
`
`S Soomro, S Shousha, P Taylor, H M Shepard, M Feldmann
`
`Abstract
`Sections of 149 breast carcinomas were
`examined for
`the over-expression of
`c-erbB-2 oncoprotein using the avidin(cid:173)
`biotin immunoperoxidase technique and
`two different specific antibodies. These
`included the polyclonal antibody 21N
`and the monoclonal antibody 4D5. The
`tumours were divided into two main
`groups. The first included 75 cases of
`invasive ductal and classic
`invasive
`lobular carcinomas. The second group
`consisted of 74 cases with histological
`types known to have a good prognosis,
`including mucinous, alveolar variant of
`invasive lobular, medullary, tubular,
`cribriform and papillary carcinomas.
`Fifteen (20%) tumours of the first group
`were positive with the two antibodies.
`Fourteen of these were of the ductal type
`and one was a mixed invasive ductal and
`lobular carcinoma. Ten of the pure
`ductal cases had areas of comedo
`carcinoma. The intraductal elements in
`a further tumour were positively stained
`with 21N antibody only. None of the
`second group of
`tumours, which
`included histological types known to
`have good prognosis, stained with 4D5,
`although one mucinous carcinoma was
`positively stained with 21N.
`These findings suggest that in invasive
`breast carcinoma immunostaining for
`c-erbB-2 is mainly seen in a subgroup of
`ductal tumours, and that almost all
`other histological types, especially those
`associated with good prognosis, lack this
`expression.
`
`Department of
`Histopathology,
`Charing Cross and
`Westminster Medical
`School, London,
`W68RF
`S Soomro
`S Shousha
`Charing Cross Sunley
`Research Centre,
`London
`P Taylor
`MFeldmann
`Genentech Inc, San
`Francisco, California,
`USA
`H M Shepard
`Correspondence to:
`DrS Shousha
`Accepted for publication
`31 October 1990
`
`c-erbB-2 (also called HER2 and neu) is a
`proto-oncogene which encodes a 185-190
`that
`is
`kilodalton glycoprotein molecule
`closely related in structure to the epidermal
`growth factor receptor. H It maps to human
`chromosome 17.5 Under experimental con(cid:173)
`ditions, c-erbB-2 becomes a potent oncogene
`with transforming activity only when it is
`overexpressed in the cells. 6
`In 1986
`the
`oncogene was found to he amplified in a small
`percentage of adenocarcinomas of various
`organs, including breast, but not in other
`types oftumours.7
`The gene product has been localised to the
`cell membrane with extracellular, transmem(cid:173)
`brane, and intracellular domains. 1 Various
`specific antibodies have been raised to the
`extra- and intracellular domains. Repeated
`
`studies have shown a good correlation be(cid:173)
`tween the amplification of the c-erbB-2 gene
`and positive immunostaining for its protein
`product
`in
`the cells using
`these specific
`antibodies,s-12 although overexpression of the
`protein product can sometimes occur in the
`absence of gene amplification. 11 12
`In breast carcinoma between 9-33% of
`invasive
`tumours overexpress
`the gene
`product, 8 9 11
`20 and there is strong evidence
`-
`that overexpression
`is
`associated with
`increased
`tumour
`aggressiveness. 111 3171
`25
`'}-
`Most of these studies were carried out mainly
`on breast carcinomas of the ductal type. As
`there are other less common types of invasive
`breast carcinoma, some of which are known to
`have a relatively good prognosis/6 27 we inves(cid:173)
`tigated the possibility that such tumours may
`have a lower incidence of c-erbB-2 protein
`overexpression. The study was carried out
`using two specific antibodies, one raised to the
`intracellular and the other to the extracellular
`domains of the c-erbB-2 gene product.
`
`Methods
`Routinely processed paraffiin wax sections of
`149 invasive breast carcinomas ·were studied.
`The cases were selected on the basis of their
`histological type and were divided into two
`groups. The first included 75 cases of invasive
`ductal and classic invasive lobular carcinomas.
`The second group included 74 cases with
`histological
`types known to have a good
`prognosis, including mucinous, medullary,
`tubular, cribriform, papillary and the alveolar
`variant of invasive lobular carcinoma (table
`1 ). 27
`Two specific antibodies were used: a poly(cid:173)
`clonal antibody, 21N (kindly supplied by
`Dr W J Gullick, ICRF Oncology Group,
`Hammersmith Hospital, London), raised to a
`synthetic peptide of the predicted sequence of
`the intracellular domain of c-erbB-2 gene
`product/ 8 and a monoclonal antibody, 4D5
`(Genentech, San Francisco, California, USA),
`raised to the extracellular domain of the gene
`product. 2
`3 1
`'}-
`Four sections, each 5 Jlm thick, were cut
`from a representative paraffiin wax embedded
`tissue block of each case. Two of these sec(cid:173)
`tions were intended for staining with the
`specific antibodies, and two were used as
`controls. All sections were incubated over(cid:173)
`night at 3TC. On the following day they were
`dewaxed in two changes of xylene for two
`minutes each and hydrated in graded alcohols.
`Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked
`
`PFIZER EX. 1089
`Page 3
`
`

`

`212
`
`Soomro, Shousha, Taylor, Shepard, Feldmann
`
`Table I c-erbB-2 immunostaining of breast carcinoma according to histological type
`
`Histological type
`(all invasive )
`
`Total No
`of cases
`
`Cases positive
`with 2/N (%)
`
`Cases p ositive
`with 4D5 ( % }
`
`Ductal
`Lobular, classic
`Composite, ductal and lobular
`Mucinous
`Lobular, alveolar variant
`Medullary
`T ubular
`Cribriform
`Papillary
`Total
`
`63
`11
`1
`23
`22
`13
`6
`6
`4
`149
`
`14 (22% )
`0
`1
`1 (4% )
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`16 (1 1% )
`
`14 (22% )
`0
`1
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`15 (10%)
`
`by 3% hydrogen peroxide in methanol for 30
`minutes at room temperature. This was foll(cid:173)
`owed by rinsing three times in O·lM TRIS(cid:173)
`buffered-saline (TBS), pH 7·6.
`Sections intended for staining with the
`polyclonal antibody 21N, and their controls,
`were incubated with 10% normal swine serum
`in TBS. Sections intended for staining with
`the monoclonal antibody 4D5, and their con(cid:173)
`trols, were incubated in 10% normal rabbit
`serum. After 30 minutes excess serum was
`removed and sections were incubated over(cid:173)
`night at 4oC either with the specific primary
`antisera, or, for the negative controls, with
`TBS .
`On the following day sections were rinsed
`in TBS and then covered for 30 minutes with
`a 1 in 250 solution of the secondary antibodies
`in TBS
`(biotinylated
`swine anti-rabbit
`immunoglobulin for 21N, and biotinylated
`rabbit anti-mouse immunoglobulin for 4D5;
`both from Dakopatts, England). Sections
`were then rinsed three times with TBS and
`incubated for 60 minutes in avidin-biotin
`complex-horseradish peroxidase (Dakopatts,
`England). After rinsing in TBS sections were (cid:173)
`incubated with diaminobenzidine
`(DAB,
`Sigma, England) for six minutes and then
`counterstained with Harris's haematoxylin,
`dehydrated in graded alcohols, and mounted
`with Permount.
`The results were assessed semiquanti(cid:173)
`tatively according to the percentage of cells
`showing membrane staining so
`that ( - )
`indicated absence of stained cells,
`( + )
`indicated staining of less than 33% of tumour
`cells, ( + +) staining of 33-66% of tumour
`cells, and ( + + + ) staining of more than 66%
`of the cells. Cells showing cytoplasmic stain(cid:173)
`ing only were regarded as negative. 32 33
`
`Results
`Only 15 tumours stained with both antibodies
`(table 1). Of these, 14 were invasive ductal
`(22% of all ductal cases examined), 10 of which
`had areas of intraductal comedo elements (fig 1 ).
`The only other positive case was a composite
`tumour comprising two distinct zones, one
`invasive ductal and the other classic lobular;
`both showed strong positive staining ( + + + )
`with the two antibodies.
`Positive staining with 21N was seen in two
`other tumours. These included a moderately
`stained ( + +)pure mucinous carcinoma (fig 2)
`and the intraductal elements of an invasive
`
`c-erbB-2 positi'l!e in'l!asi'l!e ductal carcinoma
`Figure I
`(avidin-biotin complex).
`
`/
`
`..
`
`· '~ , -~
`Figure 2 c-erbB-2 ( 2I N ) positive pure mucinous
`carcinoma (avidin-biotin complex) .
`
`Table 2 Comparison of semiquanticatively assessed
`staining results of 21N and 4D5 antibodies in invasive
`elements of 63 ductal carcinomas
`
`Antibody
`
`Total
`
`+
`
`+ + + + +
`
`21N
`405
`
`63
`63
`
`49
`49
`
`13
`6
`
`ductal tumour. These two tumours did not
`stain with 4D5.
`All remaining 133 tumours were negative
`with the two antibodies. These included all
`pure classic and alveolar lobular carcinomas,
`22 of the 23 mucinous carcinomas, and all
`medullary, tubular, cribriform and papillary
`tumours examined (table 1).
`Thus the two antibodies gave concordant
`results in 147 (98·7%) out of the 149 cases
`examined. In a given positive case, however,
`21N tended to stain more cells than 4D5 (table
`2). On the other hand, cytoplasmic staining,
`presumably non-specific, was often seen with
`21N, but was not encountered in cases stained
`with4D5.
`
`Discussion
`The main finding of this study is the almost
`consistent absence of c-erbB-2 immunostaining
`in the uncommon histological varieties of
`invasive breast carcinoma, which are known to
`be associated with better prognosis than the
`. common invasive ductal variety. This was
`
`PFIZER EX. 1089
`Page 4
`
`

`

`c-erbB-2 in breast carcinoma
`
`213
`
`especially so when the monoclonai antibody
`4D5, which
`recognises
`the extracellular
`domain of the oncogene product, was used.
`The results obtained with the polyclonal
`antibody 21N were similar, except for one case
`of mucinous carcinoma which was positive
`with this antibody but not with 4D5 (table 1).
`The findings provide indirect support for the
`existence of an association between positive
`immunostammg
`and
`increased
`c-erbB-2
`aggressiveness of invasive tumours. As most of
`these special types of breast carcinoma, with
`the exception of the medullary type, are also
`usually rich in oestrogen receptors/7 34
`the
`findings are in line with the presence, in general,
`of an inverse relation between c-erbB-2 and
`oestrogen receptors. 18 25 3>-39
`Almost all cases of invasive lobular carcin(cid:173)
`oma examined, whether classic or alveolar in
`type, did not overexpress this oncoprotein. The
`only positive lobular elements were seen in a
`composite tumour which consisted of separate,
`but adjacent, lobular and ductal parts. There
`are no published references about the c-erbB-2
`expression of the alveolar variant of lobular
`investigators who have
`carcinoma, but
`examined cases of the classic variant found
`them either all negative, 12 17 35 40 or to have
`included only an occasional positive case. 9 14 39 41
`In view of the recently reported absence of the
`oncoprotein in lobular carcinoma in situ40 42 the
`that overexpression of
`findings
`suggest
`c-erbB-2 may not have an important role in
`lobular neoplasia. The presence of c-erbB-2
`immunostammg
`in
`the composite ductal/
`lobular tumour examined may indicate that the
`pathogenesis of the lobular-looking elements in
`this case is different from that of pure lobular
`tumours.
`The only cases that were positively stained
`with the two antibodies used in this study were
`either purely or partly of ductal type, and most
`of these cases also contained
`intraductal
`comedo elements . This is consistent with the
`findings of most previous studies and strongly
`supports the suggestion that overexpression of
`c-erbB-2 oncoprotein in invasive breast carcin(cid:173)
`oma is almost totally restricted to a subset of
`ductal tumours with specific morphological
`features. 9 16 40 42 It also seems that there are only
`two specific types of in situ breast tumour which
`frequently overexpress
`the oncoprotein(cid:173)
`namely, intraductal comedo c-arcinoma9 39 42 and
`Paget's disease of the nipple.404344 It is tempt(cid:173)
`ing to suggest that a common thread may
`connect these three lesions, one invasive and
`two in situ, together. They are all characterised
`by large cell size, and although they may
`occasionally occur separately, they are more
`commonly seen in a combination of two or
`three; and when they do, they ·almost all
`overexpress the c-erbB-2 oncoprotein.4344 The
`neoplastic changes are probably the same and
`involve specific cells at specific anatomical sites,
`and what determines what type of lesion(s)
`develop(s) is the primary site of the target
`cell(s) involved in the neoplastic process and its
`original directional proliferation potential.
`Our study also shows that there is an
`·· excellent correlation (98·7%) between the
`
`immunostaining results obtained with the two
`antibodies used which were raised to different
`domains of the oncogene product (intra- and
`extra-cellular). The polyclonal antibody raised
`to the intracellular domain (21N), however,
`tended to stain more cells in a given case,
`exclusively stained two (1·4%) extra cases
`(table 2), and in some tumours showed cyto(cid:173)
`plasmic staining which is considered to be non(cid:173)
`specific by most authors.
`
`We thank Dr W J Gullick of the ICRF Oncology Group,
`Hammersmith Hospital for supplying us with the 21N antibody.
`Photography was carried out by Mr Ron Barnett.
`
`This study was presented in the Summer meeting of the
`Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland which was
`held in Nottingham, England, between 10-13 July 1990.
`This work is part of Dr Soomro's PhD thesis.
`
`Schechter AL, Stern DF, Vaidyanathen L, eta/. The neu(cid:173)
`oncogene: an erbB related gene encoding a 185,000
`M tumour antigen. Nature 1984;312 :513- 16.
`Coussense L, Yang-Fang TL, Liao Y-C, eta/. Tyrosine
`kinase receptor with extensive homology to EGF receptor
`shares chromosomal location with neu oncogene . Science
`1985;230: 11 32-9.
`Yamamoto T , lkawa S, Akiyama T, et a/. Similarity of
`protein encoded by the human c-erbB-2 gene to epidermal
`growth factor receptor. Natu re 1986;319:230-4.
`4 Akiyama T, Sudo C, Ogawara H , Toyoshima K , Yamamoto
`T. The product of the human c-erbB-2 gene: A 185-
`kilodalton glycoprotein with tyrosine kinase activity.
`Science 1986;232: 1644-6.
`Schechter AL, Hung M-C, Vaidyanathan L, eta/. The neu
`gene: An erb B-homologous gene distinct from and
`unlinked to the gene encoding the EGF receptor. Science
`1985;229:976-8.
`6 Di Fiore PP, Pierce JH, Kraus MH, Segatto 0, King CR,
`Aaronson SA. erb B-2 is a potent oncogene when overex(cid:173)
`cells.
`1987;237:
`in NIH/3T3
`pressed
`Science
`178-82.
`Yokotaj, Yamamoto T, Toyoshima K, eta/. Amplification of
`c-erbB-2 in human adenocarcinomas in vivo. L ancet
`1986;i:765-7.
`8 Venter D J, Tuzi NL, Kumar S, Gullick WJ. Overexpression
`of the c-erb B-2 oncoprotein in human breast carcinomas:
`immunohistological assessment correlates with gene
`amplification. Lancet !987;i i:69-72.
`9 Van de Vijver MD , Peterse JL, Mooi WJ, eta/. Neu-protein
`overexpression in breast cancer. Association with comedo(cid:173)
`type ductal carcinoma in situ and limited prognostic value
`in stage II breast cancer. N Eng/J Med 1988;319:1239-45.
`10 Walker RA, Senior PV, j ones JL, Critchley DR, Varley JM .
`An immunohistochemical and in situ hybridisation study
`of c-myc and c-erbB-2 expression in primary human
`breast carcinomas. J Patho/1989;158:97-105.
`II Slamon DJ, Godolphin W, j ones LA, eta/. Studies uf the
`HER-2/neu proto-oncogene in human breast and ovarian
`cancer. Sciena 1989;244: 707-12.
`12 Parkes HC, Lillycrop K , Howell A, Craig RK. C-erbB2
`mRNA expression in human breast tumours: comparison
`with c-erbB2 DNA amplification with prognosis. Br J
`Cancer 1990;61 :39-45.
`13 Slamon DJ, Clark GM, Wong SG, Levin WJ, U llrich A,
`McGuire WJ. Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse
`and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu
`oncogene. Science 1987;235 : 177-82.
`14 Barnes DM, Lammie GA, Millis RR, Gullick WL, Allen
`DS, Altman D G. An immunohistochemical evaluation of
`c-erbB-2 expression in human breast carcinoma. Br J
`Cancer 1988;58:448-52.
`IS Gusterson BA, Machin LG, Gullick WJ, et a/. C-erbB-2
`expression in benign and malignant breast disease. Br J
`Cancer 1988;58:453-7.
`16 Adnane J, Gaudray P, Simon M-P, Simony-Lafontaine ],
`Jeanteur P, Theillet C. Proto-oncogene amplification and
`human breast
`tumor phenotype. Oncogene 1989;4:
`1389-95.
`17 Walker RA, Gullick WJ, Varley JM. An evaluation of
`immunoreactivity for c-erbB-2 protein as a marker of poor
`short-term prognosis in breast cancer. Br J Cancer
`1989;60:426-9.
`18 Zeillinger R, Kury F, Czerwnka K , eta/. HER-2 amplifica(cid:173)
`tion, steroid receptors and epidermal growth factor recep(cid:173)
`tor in primary breast cancer. Oncogene 1989;4:109-14.
`19 Zhou D-J, Ahuja H , Cline MJ. Proto-oncogene abnor(cid:173)
`malities in human breast cancer: c-ERBB-2 amplification
`does not correlate with recurrence of disease. Oncogene
`1989;4:105-8.
`'
`20 Paik S, Hazan R, Fisher ER, et a/. Pathologic findings from
`
`PFIZER EX. 1089
`Page 5
`
`

`

`214
`
`Soomro, Shousha, Taylor, Shepard, Feldmann
`
`the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project:
`prognostic significance of erb B-2 protein overexpression
`in primary breast cancer. J Clin Onco/1990;8:103--12.
`21 Cline MJ, Battifora H, Yokota J. Proto-oncogene abnor(cid:173)
`in human breast cancer: correlations with
`malities
`anatomic features and clinical course of disease. J Clin
`Onco/1987;5:999-1006.
`22 Varley JM, Swallow JE, Brammar WJ, Whittaker JL,
`Walker RA. Alterations to either c-erbB-2 (neu) or c-myc
`proto-oncogenes in breast carcinomas correlate with poor
`short-term prognosis. Oncogene 1987;1:423--30.
`23 Zhou D, Battifora H, Yokota J, Yamamoto T, Cline MJ.
`Association of multiple copies of the c-erbB-2 oncogen
`with spread of breast carcinoma. Cancer Res 1987;
`47:6123--5.
`24 Tandon AK, Clark GM, Chamness GC, Ullrich A,
`McGuire WL. HER-2/neu oncogene protein and prog(cid:173)
`nosis in breast cancer. J Clin Onco/1989;7:112~.
`25 De Potter C, Beghin C, Makar AP, Vandekerckhove D,
`Roels HJ. The neu-oncogene protein as a predictive factor
`for haematogenous metastases in breast cancer patients.
`lnt J Cancer 1990;45:55-8.
`26 McDivitt RW, Stewart FW, Berg JW. Tumours of the
`breast. Fascicle 2. In: Atlas of tumor pathology. Second
`series. Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of
`Pathology, 1968:86.
`27 Shousha S, Backhaus CM, Alaghband-Zadeh J, Burn I.
`Alveolar variant of invasive lobular carcinoma of the
`breast. A tumor rich in estrogen receptors. Am J Clin
`Patho/1986;85:1 - 5.
`28 Gullick WJ, Berger MS, Bennett PLP, Rothbard JB,
`Waterfield MD. Expression of the c-erbB-2 protein in
`normal and transformed cells. lnt J Cancer 1987;40:
`246-54.
`29 Hudziak RM, Schlessinger J, Ullrich A. Increased expres(cid:173)
`sion of the putative growth factor receptor p185HER2
`causes transformation and tumorigenesis of NIH 3T3
`cells. Proc Nat/ Acad Sci USA 1987;84:7159-63.
`30 Hudziak RM, Lewis GD, Shalaby MR, et al. Amplified
`expression of the HER2/ERBB2 oncogene induces resis(cid:173)
`tance to tumor necrosis factor alpha in NIH 3T3 cells.
`Proc Nat/ A cad Sci USA 1988;85:5102-6.
`31 Hudziak RM, Lewis GD, Winget M, Fendly BM, Shepard
`HM, Ullrich A. p185HER2 monoclonal antibody has
`antiproliferative effects in vitro. and sensitizes human
`breast tumor cells to tumor necrosis factor . Mol Cell Bioi
`1989;9: 1165-72.
`
`32 Gusterson BA, Gullick WJ, Venter DJ, et al. Immuno(cid:173)
`histochemical localization of c-erbB-2 in human breast
`carcinomas. Mol Cell Probes 1988;2:383--91.
`33 De Potter CR, Quatacker J, Maertens G. The subcellular
`localization of the neu protein in human normal and
`neoplastic cells. lnt J Cancer 1989;44:969-74.
`34 Shousha S, Coady AT, Stamp T, James KR, Alaghband(cid:173)
`Zadeh J. Oestrogen receptors in mucinous carcinoma of
`the breast: an immunohistological study using paraffin wax
`sections. J Clin Patho/1989;42:902-5.
`35 Garcia I, Dietrich P-Y, Aapro M, Vauthier G, Vadas L,
`Engel E. Genetic alterations of c-myc, c-erbB-2, and
`c-Ha-ras protooncogenes and clinical association
`in
`human breast carcinomas. Cancer Res 1989;49:6675-9.
`36 Roux-Dosseto M, Romain S, Dussault N, Martin PM.
`Correlation of erbB-2 gene amplification with low levels of
`estrogen and/or progesterone receptors in primary breast
`cancer: do erbB-2 products delineate hormone-indepen(cid:173)
`dent tumors? Biomed Pharmacother 1989;43:641-9.
`37 Wright C, Angus B, Nicholson S, et al. Expression of
`c-erbB-2 oncoprotein: a prognostic indicator in human
`breast cancer. Cancer Res 1989;49:2087-90.
`38 Heintz NH, Leslie KO, Rogers LA, Howard PL. Amplifica(cid:173)
`tion of the c-erbB-2 oncogene and prognosis of breast
`adenocarcinoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1990;114:160-3.
`39 Marx D, Schauer A, Reiche Chr, et al. c-erbB2 expression in
`correlation to other biological parameters of breast cancer.
`J Cancer Res Clin Onco/1990;116: 15-20.
`40 Gusterson BA, Machin LG, Gullick WJ, et al. Immuno(cid:173)
`histochemical distributionofc-erbB-2 in infiltrating and in
`situ breast cancer. lnt J Cancer 1988;42:842-5.
`41 Ro J, EI-Naggar A, Ro JY, et al. c-erbB-2 amplification in
`node negative human breast cancer. Cancer Res 1989;
`49:6941-4.
`42 Ramachandra S, Machin L, Ashley S, Monaghan P, Guster(cid:173)
`son BA. Immunohistochemical distribution of c-erbB-2
`in in situ breast carcinoma-A detailed morphological
`analysis. J Patho/1990;161:7-14.
`43 Lammie GA, Barnes DM, Millis RR, Gullick WJ. An
`immunohistochemical study of the presence of c-erbB-2
`protein in Paget's disease of the nipple. Histopathology
`1989;15:504-14.
`44 Keatings L, Sinclair J, Wright C, et al. c-erbB-2 oncoprotein
`expression
`in mammary and extramammary Paget~s
`disease: an immunohistochemical study. Histopathology
`1990;17:243--7.
`
`PFIZER EX. 1089
`Page 6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket