throbber
Journal of
`OLECULAR
`BIOLOGY
`
`Editors in Chief
`J. C. KENDREW S. BRENNER
`
`olume 186
`
`Number 3
`
`5 Decem.ber 1985
`
`San Diego
`Orlando
`London
`Toronto Montreal
`Sydney
`
`New York
`Tokyo
`
`JMOBAK 186 (3) 483- 677
`ISSN 0022- 2836
`
`PFIZER EX. 1063
`Page 1
`
`

`

`Journal of Molecular Biology
`
`Editors-in-Chief
`J . C. Kendrew, 7 All Saints Passage. Cambridge CB2 3LS. England
`f:l . Brenner , M.R.C. La bora tory of Molecula r Biology . Uni versity P ostgrad uate Medi cal School
`Hills Road. Cambridge CB2 2QH , England
`
`nen es :
`
`}
`
`Gene stru cture
`Gene mod ifi cation
`Gene ex pression
`Gene regulation
`
`( 'ells:
`
`Ce ll development
`Cell fun ct ion
`
`Organellt> structures }
`Macromolec ula r
`assemblies
`
`Molen d e8:
`
`Macromolec ula r
`stru cture
`
`Physical chemistry
`
`L etters to the
`Editor:
`
`General
`Pre limina ry X-ray data
`
`Editors
`S. B ren ner (address a bove) .
`P. Chambon , Laboratoire de Genet iq ue Moleculaire des E ucaryotes du
`CN RS. Institu t de Chimie Biologique. F aculte de Medi cine, II Rue
`Humann . 67085 Strasbourg Cedex . F rance.
`J.I.J. Gottesman , Laboratory of Molecular Biology . National Cancer
`Instit ute , Nationa l Institu tes of Hea lt h, Bethesda, Mel 20205,
`U.S.A.
`I. Herskowitz, Depa rtment of Biochemistry a nd Biophysics, School of
`Medi cine. Uni versity of California . San Francisco, C'A 941 43. U.S.A.
`B. Mach , Depa rtement d~ Mi cro biologie , C.M.ll .. 9 a \'. de Champel, CH-
`1211 Geneve 4. Swi tzerland .
`A'. Matsubam , Instit ute for Molecula r a nd Cellular Biology. Osaka
`Cni versity , Ya mada -oka , Sui ta. Osaka 565, J apan .
`H. E . Hu xley . M. R.C' . Labora tory of Molecula r Biology , Un iversity
`Postgrad uate Med ical Schoo l. Hills Road , Ca mbridge CB2 2QH,
`England .
`A . Kl ug. M.R. C'. Laboratory of Molecula r Biology. University
`Postgradu ate Med ical Schoo l. Hills Road. Cambridge CB2 2QH.
`Engla nd .
`R. H1tber . Ma x-Pi anck-Tnstit ut fii r Biochemie. 8033 Mart insried bei
`Miin chen. Germ any .
`J . C. K endrew (address ~bove) .
`G . A . Gilbert , De pa rt ment of Biochemistrv. Universitv of Birmingham.
`P .O. Box 363 , Birmingham B l5 2TT~ England .

`S . Brenner (address abo\'e) .
`R . Hu.ber (add ress abo,·e) .
`J . C. K endrew (address a bove) .
`
`{
`{
`{
`
`Associate Editors
`( '. R . Cant01· , Depart ment of Human Genetics and Development. College of P hysicians Hurgeons of Columbia
`Uni versity , 70 1 West 168 Street, Room 1602. New York , NY 10032, U.S .A.
`1'. Lu zzati , Cent re de Genetique Molecul aire. Cent re National de Ia Recherche Scient ifi que. 9 1 Gif-sur-Yvette . France.
`J . H. M iller. Depa rt ment of Biology, U niversity of California , 405 Hilgard Avenue. Los Angeles. CA 90024 . U.H.A .
`M . F. M oody , School of Pha rm acy , Uni versity of London. 29/39 Brunswi ck Sq uare. London WC I N I AX.
`
`Publ ished t wi ce a mont h on t he 5th and 20t h at 24- 28 Ova l R oad , London NW I 7DX , E ngland by Academic P ress Inc.
`(London ) Limi ted .
`
`1985. Volum es 181- 186, 24 Issues. Inla nd , £498.00 in cluding postage and pac king; abroad , $1250.00 including postage
`and packing. Index and Cumul ative Contents of Volu me
`I to 20. 21 to 4-0. 41 to 60: prices on appli cation .
`
`~u bser ipt i o n orders should be sent to Academi c Press In c. (London) Limi ted . 24-- 28 Ova l Road. Londo n NWI 7DX.
`with the exce pt ion of t hose originating in t he U.S.A ., Canada, Cent ra l Ameri ca and Sout h America; t hese shou ld be sent
`to Academi c Press In c., Ill Fift h Avenue. New York . New York 10003 . Second class postage paid at Ja maica. N.Y ..
`LTXA . Air freight and mailing in t he U.S.A . by Pu blications Ex ped it ing Inc .. 200 Meacham A,·enue, E lmont , N.Y.
`1100:~ . U . ~ .A . Send notices of cha nge of address to t he offi ce of t he Pu blishers at least 6- 8 weeks in advance. Please
`in clude both old a nd new addresses. Postmaster. send changes of address to J o-urnal of Molecular Biology . Ill Fift h
`Av enue. New York , N.Y. 10003, U.S .A ..
`© 1985 A cad em ic Press Inc. (London ) Ltd . The a ppearance of t he code at the bot tom of t he fi rst page of a paper in this
`journ al indi cates the copy right owner's consent t hat copies of t he paper may be made for personal or internal use. or for
`the persona l or intem al use of specific clients in t he U.S.A. T his consent may be given on t he condit ion. wit hin the
`L .S.A .. t hat the copier pay t he stated per-copy fee t hrough t he Copy right Clearance Center. In c., 21 Congress Street,
`~al em . MA 01970 , U .S.A . for copy ing beyond t hat permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of t he LT.S. Copyright Law. This
`con ent does not extend to other kinds of copy ing, such as copy ing for general dist ribution. for advert ising or
`promotional purposes, for creating new collective works. for resale or for the copy ing or d istribu t ing copies outside the
`L .S.A.
`
`PFIZER EX. 1063
`Page 2
`
`

`

`J. Mol. Biol. (1985) 186, 651 - 663
`
`Domain Association in Immunoglobulin Molecules
`The Packing of Variable Domains
`
`Cyrus Chothia
`
`M RC Laboratory of Molecular Biology
`Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QH
`
`and
`Christopher Ingold Laboratories
`Department of Chemistry, University College London
`20 Gordon Street, London WC1H OAJ, England
`
`Jiri N ovotny, Robert Bruccoleri
`
`Molecular & Cellular Laboratory
`Massachusetts General Hospital
`
`and
`Harvard Medical School, Boston MA 02114, U.S.A .
`
`and
`Martin Karplus
`
`Department of Chemistry
`Harvard University, Cambridge MA 02138, U.S.A.
`
`(Received 17 July 1984, and in revised form 19 July 1985)
`
`We have analyzed the structure of the interface between VL and VH domains in three
`immunoglobulin fragments: Fab KOL, Fab NEW and Fab MCPC 603. About 1800 A 2 of
`protein surface is buried between the domains. Approximately three quarters of this
`interface is form ed by the packing of the VL and VH fj-sheets in the conserved
`" fram ework " and one quarter from contacts between the hypervariable regions. The
`fj-sheets that form the interface have edge strands that are strongly twisted (coiled) by
`P-bulges. As a result, the edge strands fold back over their own fj-sheet at two diagonally
`opposite corners. When the VL and VH domains pack together, residues from these edge
`strands form the central part of the interface and give what we call a three-layer packing;
`i.e. there is a third layer composed of side-chains inserted between tht: two backbone side(cid:173)
`chain layers that are usually in contact. This three-layer packing is different from
`previously described fj-sheet packings. The 12 residues that form the central part of the
`three observed VL-VH packings are absolutely or very strongly conserved in all
`immunoglobulin sequences. This strongly suggests that the structure described here is a
`genera l model for the association of VL and VH domains and that the three- layer packing
`plays a central role in forming the antibody combining site.
`
`1. Introduction
`
`Immunoglobulins are the best-studied examples
`of a large and ancient family of proteins, which also
`includes fj-microglobulins. Thy-1 antigens, major
`
`(i .e. class II) histo(cid:173)
`(i.e. class I) and minor
`compatibility antigens and cell surface receptors.
`Functionally, all these structures are involved in
`cell recognition processes (Jensenius & Williams,
`1982), either actively as vehicles endowed with
`
`0022- 2836/85/230651-13 03 .00/0
`
`651
`
`© 1985 Academic Press Inc. (London) Ltd.
`
`PFIZER EX. 1063
`Page 3
`
`

`

`652
`
`C. Chothia, J. Novotny , R . Bruccoleri and M . Karplus
`
`recognition specificity (antigen-combing antibodies)
`or passively as surface structures that are being
`recognized (histocompatibility antigens). Only the
`immunoglobulin tertiary structures are known to
`date (Schiffer et al. , 1983; Epp et al. , 1974; Saul et
`al., 1978; Segal et al., 1974; Marquart et al., 1980;
`Deisenhofer, 1981; Phizackerley et al., 1979).
`However, the homology among primary structures
`of immunoglobulin, /1-microglobulin , Thy-1 antigen,
`some of the histocompatibility antigen domains,
`T-cell receptor p chain and the transepithelial
`"secretory component" has been interpreted as
`evidence for a common fold (Cunningham et al. ,
`1973; Orr et al. , 1979; Feinstein , 1979; Cohen et al. ,
`1980, 1981a; Novotny & Auffray, 1984; Yangai et
`al., 1984; Hedrick et al., 1984; Mostov et al., 1984).
`A typical antibody molecule (IgG 1) consists of
`two pairs of light chains (Mr 25,000) and two pairs
`of heavy chains (Mr 50,000), each of the chains
`being
`composed of domains made up of
`approximately 100 amino acid
`residues. The
`domains are autonomous folding units; it has been
`demonstrated experimentally
`(Hochman et al. ,
`1973; Goto & Hamaguchi, 1982) that a polypeptide
`chain segment corresponding to a single domain can
`be
`refolded
`independently of the rest of the
`polypeptide chain . All the immunoglobulin domains
`are formed by two /1-sheets packed face-to-face and
`.covalently connected together by a disulfide bridge.
`The topology of the N-terminal , variable domains
`in both the light and heavy chains differs from that
`of the C-proximal constant domains. While the two
`variable domain sheets consist of five and four
`strands, respectively, the constant domain sheets
`are three- and four-stranded (Fig. 1). The four(cid:173)
`stranded /1-sheets of the two domain types are
`homologous; the five- or four- stranded /1-sheet of
`the variable domains derives from the three-strand
`sheet of the constant domains by the addition , at
`one side, of a two-stranded /1-hairpin or a single
`/1-strand, respectively.
`In a complete immunoglobulin molecule, domains
`that correspond to different polypeptide chains
`associate to form domain dimers VL- VH , CL- CH1
`and CH3-CH3. Edmundson et al. (1975) were the
`first
`to note
`the phenomenon of
`rotational
`allomerism between
`the variable and constant
`domain dimers, that is, whereas the C-C dimers
`interact via a close packing of their four-strand
`sheets, the V- V dimers pack " inside out", with the
`five-stranded
`sheets oriented
`face-to-face. The
`reversal of domain- domain interaction is reflected
`in the amino acid sequence homology between , and
`among,
`the constant and variable domains
`(Novotny & Franek, 1975; Beale & Feinstein , 1976;
`Novotny et al. , 1977).
`Different antibody molecules
`same
`the
`in
`organism bind different antigenic structures. The
`variation in specificity
`is produced by several
`mechanisms: mutations, deletions and insertions in
`the binding regions of the VL and VH domains; and
`the association of different light and heavy chains.
`Aspects of the second mechanism are analyzed in
`
`this paper. In particular, the nature of the interfi
`between VL and VH domains is examined ~
`comparing the Fab fragments of KOL, NEW a~
`MCPC 603 myeloma proteins whose X-ra
`structures are known. The relative contributions~
`the buried surface between the dom ains from the
`conserved framewbrk
`residues and
`t he hyPe
`regions are determined. Attention ~­
`variable
`focused on the unique packing of th e interfaces an:
`the reasons for this packing are examined.
`
`2. Materials and Methods
`
`(a) Fab fmgrnent co-ordinates
`
`Cartesian co-ordinates for Fab fragm ents K OL , NEW
`and MCPC 603 were obtained from the Brookhaven Data
`Bank (Bernstein et al., 1977) . Table I lists t he domain
`classification , the nominal resolutions and t he crystallo(cid:173)
`graphic residuals (R factors) for the 3 F ab fragments. To
`facilitate comparisons of the 3 structures, t heir residue
`numbering was changed from that used in t he original
`descriptions to that used by Kabat et al. (1983). Thus, in
`this paper residues that are structurally homologous have
`the same sequence number.
`To obtain consistent sets of atomic co-ordinates, the
`original co-ordinates were dissected into individual VL-
`
`(a)
`
`I'
`(b)

`.
`lobu tn
`.
`.
`Ftgure 1. The P-sheets 111
`typiCa l tmmunog ms:
`domains. Vertices represent the position of Ox a~~ose
`linked by ribbor~s; a nd L' the
`those
`in P-sheets are
`between strands by lines. (a) The VL domam of KO ·the
`P-sheet involved in VL-VH contacts is clos~r tot ted
`
`viewer (unbroken line). (b) The same VL domam t ;in!!
`
`by approximately 90°. Note tha t the interface- or nel'll
`P-sheet is strongly twisted at diagonally opposrte cor
`(drawing by A. M. Lesk) .
`
`PFIZER EX. 1063
`Page 4
`
`

`

`Packing of Immunoglobulin Variable Domains
`
`653
`
`Table 1
`Summary of X -ray crystallographic data
`
`Land H
`chain
`types
`
`.!.I , yiii
`
`.!.I, yii
`
`K , yi
`
`Protein
`
`Fab KOL
`human
`Fab NEW
`human
`Fab MCPC 603
`mouse
`
`X-ray data
`
`Minimized
`
`Resolution R factor Energy
`(A)
`(kJ)
`(% )
`
`r.m.s. shift
`(A)
`
`Reference
`
`1·9
`
`2·0
`
`2·7
`
`26
`
`19
`
`24
`
`-3010
`
`Marquart et al. (1980)
`
`-2592
`
`0·21
`
`Saul et al. (1978)
`
`-3703
`
`0·26
`
`Segal et al. (1974)
`
`The energy given for Fab KOL is that of the unminimized crystallographic data.
`
`· dimers. The structures were subjected to 100
`the
`of constrained energy minimization with
`CHARMM version 16 using the adopted-basis
`son procedure (Brooks et al., 1983) with
`of41·8kJ (lOkcal) present on all t he atoms
`& Karplus, unpublished results). Typically,
`·ned minimization converged from original
`values of potential energy to values of about
`( -0·50 kcalfatom) with an average root(cid:173)
`co-ordinate different from the original X-ray
`of 0·3 A (see Table 1 ). The results indicate that
`llfDwo• •v~•"' l'-'"' c structures were satisfactory and that
`of potential energy can be achieved by
`ustments of the co-ordinates. Thus, both energy
`structures and the crystallographic co-ordinates
`used in the present study; essentially
`identical
`were obtained from the 2 types of co-ordinates
`
`(b) Computation of solvent-accessible sU?jaces
`and contact areas
`surfaces (Lee & Richards, 1971) were
`with programs written by A. M. Lesk using the
`of Shrake & Rupley (1973) and by T . Richmond
`the methods of Lee & Richards (1971) and
`& Richards (1978). The latter program was
`from Yale University . The water probe radius
`1·4 A and the section interval along the Z axis
`A; the atom van der Waals' radii used were 2 A
`t he (extended) tetrahedral carbon atoms, 1·85 A
`the planar (sp2 hybridized) carbons, 1·4 A and
`for carbonyl and hydroxyl oxygens, respectively ,
`for a carbony l OH group, 2·0 A for all
`t he
`tetrahedral nitrogen atoms, 1·5 A, 1·7 A and
`for sp2-hybridized nitrogen atoms carrying no
`1 and 2 hydrogen atoms, respectively , 2·0 A for
`group and 1·85 A for a divalent sulfur atom
`hydrogens.
`
`(c) {3-Strands and {3-sheets
`structures were analyzed using the CHARMM
`(Brooks et al. , 1983) in the so-called explicit
`atom representation: aliphatic hydrogens were
`together with their heavy atoms into"extended
`whereas hydrogens bound to polar atoms and
`involved
`in hydrogen bonds were explicitly
`. The {3-strands and {3-sheets were defined by
`Inter-strand backbone (C = 0 ... H -N) hydrogen-
`
`bonding pattern. A hydrogen bond list was generated in
`CHARMM for all the polypeptide chain segments under
`consideration and amino acids with hydrogen bonds of
`nearly optimal geometry (energy of -4·18 kJfbond or
`less) were taken to be parts of the {3-sheets (cf. Fig. 3 of
`Novotny et al. , 1983). This method of defining {3-strand
`boundaries gives results essentially identical to those
`obtained by visual inspection of crystallographic models,
`although it tends to be somewhat more restri ctive (the 2
`methods sometimes differ in
`in clusion of the N- or
`C-terminal {3-strand residues). Ambiguities arise in cases
`of edge {3-strands that start and end with irregular
`conformations ({3-bulges); such cases are discussed in
`more detail below.
`
`(d) {3-Strand conf ormation
`
`In a typical extended polypeptide chain segment, the
`dihedral angle between the 2 consecutive side-chains is
`not 180° as in the ideal {3-sheet (Pa uling et al., 1951) but
`closer to -160°;
`that is, the {3-strands are twisted
`The
`out-of-planarity
`angle
`(Choth ia ,
`1973).
`(180° -160°) = 20° can be obtained explicitly from the
`values of the principal backbone torsion angles cp, 1/1 and
`w (see, e.g. Chou et al. , 1982). We define the local
`backbone twist for 2 consecutive residues as:
`s = ( -~) (180-l-rl) ,
`where T is the torsion angle C{J-CIX- C' IX- C' f3 and 1-rl denotes
`its magnitude. When glycine residues that lack C{J atoms
`are encountered, the torsion angle S is measured with
`respect to the C' f3 atom following the glycine. Thus,
`glycine residues contribute to t he local backbone twist
`indirectly, by being in cluded in t he virtual bond CIX-CIX
`that spans from the residue preceding the glycine to that
`which follows it .
`Backbone twist profiles (plots of S as a function of the
`amino acid residue) serve to characterize polypeptide
`chain conformations. Certain conformational character(cid:173)
`istics of polypeptides are more clearly seen using S values
`instead of the cpljl values for individual residues. In our
`plots, the value of the torsion angle C1X-C{3-C'1X- C' f3 is
`assigned to t he second (C') residue. The angle S is related
`to " the amount of twist per 2 residues " , defined as b by
`Chou et al. ( 1982); in fact, S = tb. It thus follows t hat S
`can be obtained from the helical parameters n (number of
`residues per turn) , h (the rise per residue) and T
`(T = 360°/n) in a correspond ing way to t hat described for
`b by Cho u et al. (1982).
`
`PFIZER EX. 1063
`Page 5
`
`

`

`654
`
`C. Chothia, J. Novotny, R . Bruccoleri and M. Karplus
`
`3. Results
`
`(a) Domain-domain contact surfaces
`We identified the residues t hat form t he interface
`between VL and VH by calculation of t he solvent(cid:173)
`accessible surface of t he domains, first in isolation
`and second when associated . Any residue that lost
`surface on t he association of VL a nd VH was taken
`as part of t he interface between t hem. We also
`determined which residues form van der Waals'
`contacts across the interface (distance cutoff 4·1 A).
`The lists of residues obtained by the t wo methods
`were very similar. Thus, except for a few margina l
`cases, t he residues that lose surface in domain(cid:173)
`domain contacts also have van der Waals' inter(cid:173)
`actions between the domains, indicating that the
`VL-VH interface is tightly packed.
`The total surface areas of the separated VL and
`VH domains and t hat buried on t he association is
`shown in Table 2. The values for the buried surface
`area (between 1700 and 1900 A 2
`) and the fraction of
`the buried surface that is composed of polar ato ms
`are similar to those found in other cases (Chot hia &
`J anin , 1975). For the bovine pancreatic trypsin
`inhibitor and t rypsin it is known that t he structure
`of
`t he
`isolated
`proteins does
`not
`cha nge
`significantly on association . In most cases, as for
`the VL and VH domains considered here, there a re
`no
`data
`concerning
`the
`structure of
`the
`unassociated domains.
`Of t he total area buried between t he VL-VH
`dimers about one quarter comes from residues in
`t he hypervariable regions and about three quarters
`/3-sheets. Figure 2 shows
`the
`from
`residues
`in
`residues that form the interfaces and t he areas t hat
`are buried for the three VH- VL packings. Two
`important features are evident in t his Figure. First,
`homologous residues form the interface in the three
`structures. Second, t he pattern formed by
`t he
`contact residues is most unusual. The contacts of
`residues on the edge strands of the /3-sheets are
`more extensive than t hose of residues on the inner
`strands. This is the opposite of the behavior found
`in previously described ]1-sheet packings, where it
`is the central strands that have the largest contact.
`
`For example, for packing of /3-sheets in t he
`domain , the region of maximal contact
`runs diagonally across the sheets at 45°
`to the /3-strands (Cohen et al. , 1981 b;
`J anin , 1981). The point is clearly illustrated in
`Ca backbone plot; in Figure 2(c) ; here, for each
`t heCa ato ms a circle is displayed , the area of
`is proportional to t he total contact area made
`t he residue with the other sheet. As we
`below, the unusual packing is a direct
`of the distortions present in t his type of /3-sheet.
`
`(b) Conf ormation of interface /3-sheets
`The deviation of
`t he conformations of
`/3-sheets that form the interface between VL
`VH from t he idealized flat structure (i.e.
`coiling and bending) can be characterized by
`variations in the twist angle 9 (see Materials
`Methods). On such twist profiles, regular
`/3-sheets correspond to horizontal lines with
`average 9 = + 20°, right-handed a helices to lines
`9 = -110° and tight reverse turns as triplets ci
`points of approximately t he same magnitude IIlii
`a lternating sign . The insertion of an additional
`residue in an edge strand of a /3-sheet, so that two
`edge residues face one another on an inner strand,
`forms what has been called a /3-bulge (Richardson d
`al. , 1978). Such insertions can have a variety of
`conformational effects depending upon the exact
`cptjl values of the inserted residue and those of i
`neighbors. Usually a sharp bend or local coiling it
`produced in the edge strand ; this gives rise to I
`single- or double- point peak or trough in the 8
`values.
`In Figure 3 we show the 9 values for t he VL-VB
`interface segments (/3-strands with the adjacent
`hypervariable loops) in KOL, NEW and MCPC 603.
`/3-sheets are
`important features of these
`Two
`the Figure. First, most of the
`evident
`from
`individual values of 9, and the patterns formed by
`t he variations in 9 angles, are very similar in the
`different sheets, particularly in the inner /3-strands
`(/31 , /33, /35 and /38 of Fig. 3) and in the /3-bulges; the
`edge /3-strands (/32, /34, /36 and f39 of F ig. 3) have
`
`Table 2
`Accessible surfaces and those lost on V L--V H association ( A2
`
`)
`
`Isolated surface
`
`Contact surface
`
`Domain pair
`
`Hydrophobic Polar Total
`
`Hydrophobic Polar Total
`
`KOL VL domain
`KOL VH domain
`VL-VH in KOL
`NEW VL domain
`NEW VH domain
`VL-VH in NEW
`MCPC 603 VL domain
`MCPC 603 VH domain
`VL-VH in MCPC 603
`VL-VH average
`
`1121
`1216
`2337
`1233
`1186
`2419
`1082
`1156
`2238
`233 1
`
`658
`700
`1358
`744
`80 1
`1545
`689
`760
`1449
`171 4
`
`1779
`1926
`3705
`1977
`1985
`3962
`1771
`1916
`3687
`3785
`
`580
`615
`1195
`529
`506
`1035
`676
`619
`1295
`1195
`
`311
`250
`561
`387
`386
`773
`299
`324
`623
`652
`
`891
`865
`1756
`91 6
`892
`1808
`975
`943
`1918
`1827
`
`PFIZER EX. 1063
`Page 6
`
`

`

`Packing of I mmunoglobulin Variable Domains
`
`655
`
`31
`
`I
`I TIS
`I FSS
`
`32 H24
`
`I PSO
`100111
`I F62
`I 018
`
`027
`101DS2
`
`I
`96
`I
`I
`DO
`95N31 ____ 33
`I
`I N20
`
`95 L76 ::::92
`
`I s23
`I ::~
`I LS4
`
`96 Rl43
`
`I WI06
`I 064
`
`91 Y39
`
`34
`102 _______ 94
`I Yl2
`I W7S
`I AO
`103W71
`93Ao:::: 35TO
`I W73
`I AO
`I E9
`I
`I
`I
`was
`j~~~r===y~~ T::~
`
`10~4
`02s
`I
`106:
`
`F32
`
`V6
`
`104 ______ _ 92
`
`36
`
`"4s t11~s~
`I G30
`44GI3
`R96
`
`107:::_-_-_:90
`
`38:::::::46
`
`I
`1018
`
`1 ________ 1 048
`819 ________ 319g~~
`
`40 ______ "43 /
`I
`I
`
`109::::::::-88
`I
`I
`
`VH
`
`(b)
`
`I L4S
`
`4
`
`t;b
`
`16
`
`44 =~
`I ::;
`
`43A63
`P61
`
`-------
`37 - _____ _45~
`
`8
`
`:::::::3
`
`15
`
`18
`
`/
`39 _______ "42
`I
`I
`
`1
`104 _______ 84
`I
`I
`
`VL
`
`(a)
`
`33
`97 ::::::: 90
`I AO
`I N24
`I F96
`98 F9S
`89 06 :::: 34 K30
`I 09
`I A9
`I FIIO
`....-:::::99--- -----88
`I Y48
`
`35
`I Y41
`
`100~(4
`
`A32
`
`11
`-------
`..........
`102 ___ __ -- 86
`
`sr~~==::316~!~
`I
`I
` gii
`
`I
`
`10
`
`3
`
`( c )
`2. P-Sheet residues that form the VL-VH in terface in the Fabs KOL, NEW and MCPC 603. Residue numbers
`of Kabat et al. (1983). (a) VL interface-forming P-sheet; (b) VH interface-forming P-sheet. Broken lines
`hydrogen bonds. At each position where a residue forms part of the interface, we give the residue identity in
`NEW and MCPC 603, and the accessible surface of the residue that is buried in the VL-VH interface. Note the
`in the edge strands at positions 43, 44 and 100, 101 in VL and 44, 45 and 105, 106 in the VH. (c) The P-sheet
`VH domain. Residues making contacts to the VL domain across the domain-domain interface are circled .
`----·u-,,. .. ,,,·n atoms are displayed. The circles associated with each Cct atom have an area proportional to the
`surface area lost when the VL-VH dimer forms . Note the large areas associated with residues in the edge
`of the P-sheet.
`
`PFIZER EX. 1063
`Page 7
`
`

`

`656
`
`C. Chothia, J. Novotny, R. Bruccoleri and M. Karplus
`
`CZ>
`
`.... .,
`·~ ....
`
`Ql
`1=1
`0 ..a
`..!If
`()
`aS
`Ill
`
`150
`
`100
`
`50
`
`0
`
`-50
`
`-100
`
`-150
`
`20
`
`150
`
`100
`
`50
`
`0
`
`-50
`
`- 100
`
`CZ>
`
`.... .,
`·~ ....
`
`Ql
`1=1
`0 ..a
`..!If
`()
`aS
`Ill
`
`Sequence nuxnber
`
`(a}
`
`85
`
`90
`
`95
`
`100
`
`105
`
`Sequence nuxnber
`
`( b}
`Figure 3. The backbone twist (3) profiles of VL--VH interface-forming segments. The segments shown include:;
`hypervariable loops (Ll , L2, L3 , Hl , H2 and H3) and the {J-strands. The {J-strands are indicated by bars at the bot ce
`of the plots and labeled {J I through {J9 according to Novotny et al. (1983) . {J-B ulges are denoted by open boxes. Seq~~: 2
`numbers correspond to the Kabat et al. (1983) numbering system and are the same as in Fig. 2. (a) and (b)
`ill·
`interface-form ing segments of the VL domain ; (c) and (d) the 2 interface-forming seg ments of the VH doma
`(0) KOL; (0) NEW; (L",.} MCPC 603.
`
`PFIZER EX. 1063
`Page 8
`
`

`

`Packing of Immunoglobulin Variable Domains
`
`657
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`Sequence number
`(c)
`
`90
`
`95
`
`100
`
`105
`
`110
`
`115
`
`120
`
`Sequence number
`
`(d)
`
`Fig. 3.
`
`/3-bulge
`of
`differences. Conservation
`·••vnn.•u. .. rm " is especially striking and implies th at
`are important architecturally , as previously
`(1981).
`The
`Richardson
`by
`pondence in t he /3-sheets is made even more
`
`t he
`in behavior of
`t he difference
`evident by
`hyperva ri a ble
`loops. The overall
`similarity of
`/3-sheet geo metries is confirmed by a least-squ ares
`fi t of t heir ato mic co-ordinates. Fits of t he main(cid:173)
`chain ato ms of t he t hree VL /3-sheets to each other
`
`PFIZER EX. 1063
`Page 9
`
`

`

`658
`
`C. Chothia, J. Novotny , R . Bruccoleri and M. Karplu
`
`Pro
`100
`
`84 39
`
`VL
`
`109
`
`88
`
`40
`
`43
`
`VH
`
`VL-VH
`
`F igure 4. The key residues in the edge strands involved in VL-VH packings (Fab KOL). Note how in (a) Pro«,
`Ty r96 and Phe98 in VL and in (b) Leu45 , ProlOO and Trpl03 in VH fold over the central strands of their /3-sheet and
`so in (c) form the core of the VL-VH packing (see also the position of these residues in Fig. 5).
`
`(30 residues) , and of the three VH /3-sheets to each
`other
`(32
`residues)
`give
`root-mean-square
`differences in atomic positions of between 0·73 and
`1·23 A (see Table 3) . If a few peripheral residues are
`removed from the fits the r.m.s.t differences are
`redu ced to 0·55 to 0·87 A. Table 3 also reports the
`results of least-squares fits of the VL /3-sheets to the
`VH /3-sheets. The r.m .s. differences are only a little
`greater than for the fits of the VL or VH /3-sheets to
`each other, 0·70 to 1·11 A. Thus, the six regions of
`/3-sheet that form the VL- VH interface in KOL,
`NEW and MCPC 603 have very similar structures.
`In fact, the least-squares superposition of the two
`sheets can be achieved as a 2-fold symmetry
`operation, i.e. rotation around an axis passing
`through the centroid of the interface.
`The second feature of the /3-sheets illustrated in
`Figure 3 is the different amounts of twist found in
`the edge and inner strands. The two central strands
`in both VL and VH have ~ values in the range that
`indicate a degree of twist commonly found
`in
`/3-sheets. The average ~ value tends to be the same
`for both the inner and the edge strands, but the
`twist of the edge strands is dominated by /3-bulges
`(Figs 2 and 3) with characteristic ~ values ± 70. Its
`effect is to fold the ends of the edge strands over
`central strands. This occurs at two diagonally
`opposite corners of the /3-sheets. Side-chains of
`residues 44 (Pro) , 96 (Tyr, Arg, Leu) and 98 (Pro) in
`VL and 45 (Leu) , 100 (Pro, Ile, Phe) and 103 (Trp)
`cover residues in the inner strands (Fig. 4(a) and
`(b)). The other parts of the edge strand residues,
`45-46 and 101- 104 in VL, 46--48 and 106--109 in
`VH, lie next to the inner strand in the normal
`manner.
`
`t Abbreviation used: r.m .s., root-mean -sq uare.
`
`(c) Packing of the /3-sheets at the V ~ V H interface
`As noted above, the strong twists that occur in
`the edge strands of VL and VH means t hat residues
`at two diagonally opposite corners fold over the
`/3-sheets: 44, 96 and 98 in VL (Fig. 4(a)), and 45,
`100 and 103 in VH (Fig. 4(b)) . Figure 4(c) show
`that when the VL and VH domains pack together
`
`Table 3
`The fit of /3-sheets forming V ~ V H interfaces
`A. Fits of individual {J-sheets
`
`VLt
`
`VHt
`
`KOL NEW MCPC
`
`KOL NEW MCPC
`
`0·76
`
`0·55
`0·82
`
`0·88
`0·96
`0·70
`
`l · ll
`1·05
`1·00
`0·87
`
`0·94
`0·97
`0·84
`0·65
`0·87
`
`VLt KOL
`NEW
`MCPC
`VHtKOL
`NEW
`MCPC
`
`B. Fits of both {J-sheet regions of the V L-V fl interfaces§
`
`KOL NEW MCPC
`
`0·87
`
`0·70
`0·87
`
`KOL
`NEW
`MCPC
`The Table give r.m.s. differences in position of the mai~ cht::
`atoms
`following
`least-sq uares
`fits of
`their co-ordma

`ces
`Differences are given in A.
`t VL residues u ed to determine fits and r .m.s. differen
`ces
`33- 39, 43- 47 , 84- 90 and 98- 104.
`t VH residues used to determine fits and r.m.s. differen
`f VL
`33- 40, 44- 48, 88- 94 and 102- 109.
`§Residues used in fits 33- 39, 43-47 , 84-90 and 98--104 °
`and 34-40, 44-48, 88-94 and 103- 109 of VH.
`
`PFIZER EX. 1063
`Page 10
`
`

`

`Packing of Immunoglobulin Variable Domains
`
`659
`
`VL
`
`VH
`
`(b)
`
`(a)
`
`VH
`
`VL
`
`(c)
`
`(d)
`
`5. Residue packing at the KOL VL-VH interface .. This Figure shows superimposed serial sections cut through
`ling model of the interface. VH residues are shown by broken lines and VL residues by continuous lines. The
`ax is that relates VL to VH is perpendicular to the page. Each part of the Figure shows 4 sections,
`by I A, superimposed . (a) ections 0 to 3 A; (b) sections 4 to 7 A; (c) sections 8 to ll A; and (d) Sections 12 to
`
`PFIZER EX. 1063
`Page 11
`
`

`

`660
`
`C. Chothia, J. Novotny , R. Bruccoleri and M. Karplus
`
`Table 4
`V L-V H interfaces
`Residues buried in
`
`Residue at this position
`in
`
`Accessible surface
`area of residue (A 2
`)
`
`Domain Residue
`No . KOL NEW MCPC
`
`KOL NEW MCPC
`
`No. of sequences known that
`include this positiont
`
`Principal residues found
`at this posit iont
`(identity and num ber of cases)
`
`VL
`
`VH
`
`34
`36
`38
`44
`46
`87
`89
`91
`96
`98
`35
`37
`39
`45
`47
`91
`93
`95
`100
`103
`
`Asn
`Tyr
`Gin
`Pro
`Leu
`Tyr
`Ala
`Trp
`Ty r
`Phe
`Tyr
`Val
`Gin
`Leu
`Trp
`Phe
`Ala
`Asp
`Pro
`Trp
`
`Lys
`Tyr
`Gin
`Pro
`Leu
`Tyr
`Gin
`Tyr
`Arg
`Phe
`Thr
`Val
`Gin
`Leu
`Trp
`Tyr
`Ala
`Asn
`Ile
`Trp
`
`Ala
`Tyr
`Gin
`Pro
`Leu
`Tyr
`Gin
`Asp
`Leu
`Phe
`Gin
`Val
`Gin
`Leu
`Trp
`Tyr
`Ala
`Asn
`Phe
`Trp
`
`2
`0
`2
`8
`17
`9
`0
`3
`6
`10
`0
`0
`8
`10
`II
`0
`0
`0
`0
`27
`
`39
`0
`7
`5
`35
`I
`I
`12
`5
`9
`2
`3
`20
`6
`6
`8
`0
`0
`32
`28
`
`0
`I
`17
`5
`8
`II
`0
`0
`3
`2
`0
`I
`21
`3
`4
`II
`I
`5
`0
`26
`
`t Data taken from Kabat et al. ( 1983).
`
`362
`318
`302
`238
`235
`227
`217
`211
`199
`206
`217
`200
`183
`163
`157
`159
`161
`131
`113
`125
`
`Ala117 , Asn92, His51 , Ser37
`Tyr243, Phe40, Val28
`Gln279
`Prol90, Phe29, Val14
`Leul57 , Gly32 , Prol9 , Vall3
`Tyrl60, Phe65
`Glnl28, Ala35
`Trp59, Tyr31 , Ser27
`Trp46 , Tyr31 , 126, R20
`Phe203
`Gln53 , Asn42, Ser34, Lys22
`Val178, Ile 19
`Gln 176
`Leul60
`Trpl51
`Tyrl28 , Phe30
`Ala146
`Asp53 , Gly 18
`Phe76, Met I I , Leu6
`Trp 11 8
`
`these six residues form the center of the interface.
`They are in contact with each other in pairs and
`make a herringbone pattern.
`Details of how residues pack at the VL- VH
`interface can be seen in sections cut through space(cid:173)
`filling models. Figure 5 shows sections of the KOL
`VL-VH interface. The central role played by the
`three pairs of edge residues, Tyr96 and Trpl03 , and
`Leu45 and Pro44 are seen in parts (b) , (c) and (d) of
`the Figure. The inner strands of the P-sheets, 32- 39
`and 84- 92 in VL and 33-40 and 88- 95 in VH , only
`make interdomain contacts at one end of the
`interface where the side-chains of Gln38 and Gln39
`hydrogen bond
`to each other (Fig. 5(a)) . The
`structures of the VL-VH interfaces in NEW and
`MCPC 603 are very similar to that of KOL
`illustrated here. This is demonstrated by graphical
`inspection of their packing and by the fits of the co(cid:173)
`ordinates of the main-chain atoms forming the VL(cid:173)
`VH interfaces described above (Table 3).
`The packing of t

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket