throbber
0022-1767/92/1484-1149S02.00/0
`THE JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
`Copyright 0 1992 by The American Association of Immunologlsts
`
`Vol. 148. 1149-1 154. No. 4. February 15. 1992
`Printed in U.S.A.
`
`CHIMERIC AND HUMANIZED ANTIBODIES WITH SPECIFICITY FOR THE
`CD33 ANTIGEN'
`
`MAN SUNG C0,2* NEVENKA M. AVDALOVIC,' PHILIP C. CARON,+ MARK V. AVDALOVIC,*
`DAVID A. SCHEINBERG,' AND CARY QUEEN"
`
`From *Protein Design Labs, Inc.. Mountain View, CA 94043 and 'Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center,
`New York, NY 10021
`
`Received for publication September 3, 1991.
`Accepted for publication November 21. 1991.
`The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
`payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked
`advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indi-
`cate this fact.
`' This work was supported in part by The Lucille P. Markey Charitable
`Trust and by Grant NIH CA55349. D.A.S. is a Lucllle P. Markey Scholar.
`The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted
`to the GenBank/EMBL Data Bank with accession numbers M83098 and
`M83099.
`'Address correspondence and reprint requests to Man Sung Co. Protein
`Design Labs, Inc.. 2375 Garcia Ave.. Mountain View, CA 94043.
`'Abbreviations used in this paper: AML. acute myelogenous leukemia:
`HAMA. human anti-mouse antibody: PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
`CDR, complementarity-determining region.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`Cloning of V region cDNAs. The V domain cDNAs for the H and
`L chains of murine M195 were cloned by an anchored PCR method
`1. First, total RNA was prepared
`(13). which is outlined in Figure
`using the hot phenol method. Briefly. 1 X 10' M 195 hybridoma cells
`were resuspended in 1.2 ml of RNA extraction buffer (50 mM sodium
`acetate, pH 5.2 , 1% SDS]. vortexed, and incubated at room temper-
`ature for 2 min. The cell lysates were then incubated with 0.6 ml of
`phenol, pH 5.2, a t 65°C for 15 min followed by a 15-min incubation
`a microcentrifuge: the aqueous
`on ice. The extract was spun in
`phase was recovered and ethanol precipitated twice. The RNA pellet
`1149
`
`L and H chain cDNAs of M195, a murine mAb that
`munogenicity of murine antibodies, rDNA technology can
`binds to the CD33 Ag on normal and leukemic mye-
`(5). Such
`be applied to construct chimeric antibodies
`loid cells, were cloned. The cDNAs were used in the
`antibodies combine the V region of a mouse antibody
`construction of mouse/human IgGl and IgG3 chi-
`with a human antibody C region, thus retaining the bind-
`meric antibodies. In addition, humanized antibodies
`ing specificity of the murine antibody while presenting
`were constructed which combined the complemen-
`less foreign amino acid sequence to the human immune
`tarity-determining regions of the M195 antibody
`system. In some but not all cases, chimeric antibodies in
`with human framework and constant regions. The
`fact have improved complement-dependent cytotoxicity
`human framework was chosen to maximize homol-
`and antibody-dependent cellular
`cytotoxicity function
`ogy with the M195 V domain sequence. Moreover, a
`relative to mouse antibodies (6) or are less immunogenic
`computer model of M195 was used to identify sev-
`in human patients (7). However, because the entire V
`eral framework amino acids that are likely to inter-
`domain of a chimeric antibody, about one third of the
`act with the complementarity-determining regions,
`molecule, is of mouse origin, chimeric antibodies may
`and these residues were also retained in the human-
`still provoke a substantial HAMA response when used to
`ized antibodies. Unexpectedly, the humanized IgGl
`treat humans.
`and IgG3 M195 antibodies, which have reshaped V
`To reduce further the immunogenicity of murine anti-
`regions, have higher apparent binding affinity for
`the CD33 Ag than the chimeric or mouse antibodies.
`bodies, Winter and
`colleagues (8-10)
`constructed re-
`shaped or "humanized" antibodies by combining only the
`smallest required part of a mouse antibody, the CDR,
`The mAb M195 is a murine IgG2a antibody reactive
`with human V region frameworks and C regions. A dis-
`with the CD33 Ag (1-3). M195 binds to early myeloid
`advantage of this approach is that the CDR may adopt a
`cells, some monocytes, and cells of most myeloid leuke-
`new conformation after being grafted onto the human
`
`mias but not to the earliest hematopoietic stem cells. The
`framework so the humanized antibody often has sub-
`M 195 Ag is also absent from any other hematopoietic or
`stantially reduced affinity for the Ag (101. To overcome
`nonhematopoietic tissue. These properties make the an-
`this problem, we have previously chosen a human frame-
`tibody a n ideal candidate for therapy of AML3 and chronic
`work a s homologous as possible to
`the original mouse
`myelogenous leukemia. The efficient cellular binding and
`framework and used computer modeling to identify sev-
`internalization of M 1 9 5 have allowed use of the radiola-
`eral key residues in the mouse framework which contact
`beled antibody in trials for AML therapy. These trials
`the CDR (1 1-12). These residues must also be transferred
`have demonstrated specific targeting of I3lI-M195 to leu-
`
`to the human framework to maintain the conformational
`kemic cells in
`the bone marrow (4). The murine M195
`integrity of the CDR.
`antibody, however, does not kill leukemic cells by com-
`In this paper we describe the cloning of the murine
`plement-dependent cytotoxicity with human complement
`M195 H and L chain V region cDNAs by a new method.
`or by antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity with hu-
`Chimeric antibodies of the human IgG1 and IgG3 isotypes
`man effector cells. The HAMA response may also pre-
`were constructed to improve the effector functions of the
`clude long term use of the murine antibody in patients.
`mouse antibody. Applying our general procedures, we
`To increase the effector function and reduce the im-
`then designed and synthesized humanized M 1 9 5 anti-
`bodies that retain the binding site of the murine antibody
`while having the potential to reduce immunogenicity fur-
`ther.
`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://www.jimmunol.org/
`
` by guest on January 24, 2018
`
`Pfizer v. Genentech
`IPR2017-01488
`Genentech Exhibit 2051
`
`

`

`1150
`
`HUMANIZED ANTIBODIES BINDING TO CD33
`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://www.jimmunol.org/
`
` by guest on January 24, 2018
`
`ends of the M195 VL cDNA clone. The 5’-primer contained a n XbaI
`site followed by the ATG codon and the next 15 nucleotides of VL.
`The 3“primer
`included the last 21 nucleotides of the VL coding
`sequence (noncoding strand) followed by
`the 17 nucleotides that
`follow the J.1 segment in mouse genomic DNA and then an XbaI
`
`site. The fragment generated by PCR with these primers was digested
`with XbaI and cloned into the XbaI site of the pVk vector. The
`correct orientation and sequence of the cloned VL segment in pVk
`were verified by sequencing. The chimeric H chain gene was con-
`structed similarly, using PCR with appropriate primers on the M 195
`VH cDNA and cloning into the XbaI sites of pVgl and pVg3.
`Constructfon of humanized genes. Nucleotide sequences were
`selected which encode the protein sequences of the humanized M195
`H and L chains. including signal peptides, generally utilizing codons
`found in
`the mouse sequence. Several degenerate codons were
`changed to create restriction sites or to remove undesirable ones.
`For each V region gene, two pairs of overlapping oligonucleotides on
`alternating strands were synthesized (Applied Biosystems 3808 DNA
`the entire coding sequences as
`synthesizer), which encompassed
`well as a splice donor signal, and contained suitable restriction sites
`at their ends. The oligonucleotides were 11 0 to 140 bases long with
`15-base overlaps. dsDNA fragments were synthesized with Klenow
`polymerase from
`the 5’-pair and separately
`from the 3’-pair of
`oligonucleotides, digested with restriction enzymes, ligated into the
`pUC18 vector, and sequenced. A 5”fragment and a 3”fragment with
`correct sequences were then excised from pUC18 and ligated to-
`gether into the XbaI sites of the expression vectors pVk. pVgl. or
`pvg3.
`Transfectfon. Transfection was by electroporation using a Gene
`Pulser apparatus (Bio-Rad) at 360 V and 25-microfaraday capaci-
`tance according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Before transfec-
`tion, the L- and H chain-containing plasmids were linearized using
`BamHI. extracted with phenol-chloroform. and ethanol precipitated.
`All transfections were done using 20 pg of each plasmid DNA and
`about 10’ Sp2/0 cells (ATCC CRL 1581) in PBS. The cells from each
`transfection were plated into one 96-well tissue culture plate. After
`48 h selective medium (DMEM + 10% FBS + HT media supplement
`(Sigma) + 1 p g h l mycophenolic acid) was applied. After the wells
`had become confluent with surviving colonies of cells, medium from
`each well was assayed for the presence and quantity of secreted
`antibodies by ELISA. A high yielding clone from each transfection
`was grown up to produce antibody for purification.
`Purfffcatfon of antlbodfes. The chimeric IgGl and IgG3 and hu-
`manized lgGl antibodies were purified from culture supernatant by
`affinity chromatography on protein A-Sepharose CL-4B (Pharmacia).
`The bound antibodies were eluted with 0.1 M glycine HC1 (pH 3.0)
`and neutralized with 1 M Tris-HC1 (pH 8.0). The buffer was ex-
`changed into PBS by passing over a PDlO column (Pharmacia) or by
`dialysis. The humanized IgG3 antibody was purified similarly but
`using protein G-agarose (Pierce Chemical Co.. Rockford. IL) instead
`of protein A-Sepharose. The isotypes of the purified antibodies were
`verified using a n Ouchterlony immunodiffusion kit (The
`Binding
`Site Ltd., Birmingham, UK). The final antibody concentration was
`determined assuming that 1 mgml has an A ~ w of 1.35.
`Affttrttty measurements. The purified antibodies were labeled
`with NaIz5I using chloramine-T, to 2 to 10 pCi/pg of protein. Scat-
`chard analysis was made by binding dilutions of labeled antibody to
`lo5 HL60 cells for 90 min at 0°C. The cells were washed in RPMI
`medium and counted. To avoid nonspecific and FcR binding, the
`assays were done in the presence of human serum. The least squares
`method was used to fit a line to the plot of bound/free vs bound
`antibody, and the apparent K, was read from the slope of the line.
`
`RESULTS
`Cloning of V region cDNAs. The M195 H and L chain
`V domain cDNAs were cloned using an anchored PCR
`method (Fig. l), with 3’-primers that hybridized to the C
`regions and 5”primers that hybridized to the G-tails.
`Immunoglobulin chains have been cloned previously by
`PCR using mixed 5”primers (18, 19). but that method
`may not yield the true sequence of the 5’-part of the
`chain and may not suffice to clone chains with unusual
`5’-sequences. Two independent M 1 9 5 L chain clones
`obtained by our method were sequenced and found to be
`identical: similarly, two H chain clones had the same
`sequence. The nucleotide sequences of the L and H chain
`V regions have been deposited in GenBank: the translated
`protein sequences of the mature chains are shown in
`
`V
`
`V
`
`cDNA 3‘
`
`3’ GGGG
`w
`EcoRl
`
`Reverse Transcription
`
`-
`J G Tailing
`
`C
`
`C
`
`I
`
`I
`
`TTTT 5’
`
`TTTT 5’
`
`Hindlll
`
`I PCR
`
`t
`
`C
`
`
`
`“
`
`V
`
`1
`3’
`5’
`EcoRl
`Hindlll
`Figure 1. Scheme for cloning of light and H chain V region cDNAs.
`Horfzontal arrrows represent oligonucleotide primers.
`
`was resuspended in H 2 0 and quantitated by an OD260 reading. cDNA
`was synthesized from the RNA by incubating 5 pg of total RNA with
`40 ng of dT12-1B (Pharmacia LKB Biotechnology Inc.. Piscataway.
`NJ). 200 U of Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase
`(Bethesda Research Laboratories, Bethesda, MD). 40 U of RNasin
`(Promega Biotec. Madison, WI), 50 mM Tris-HC1. pH 8.3, 75 mM KCl.
`10 mM dithiothreitol, 3 mM MgC12. and a 0.5 mM concentration of
`each dNTP in a 2 0 4 reaction volume for 60 min a t 3 7 T . The cDNA
`was purified by phenol extraction and ethanol precipitation. A tail
`of dGs was added to the 3’-terminus of the cDNA by incubating it
`with 15 U of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (Bethesda Re-
`search Laboratories), 0.1 M potassium cacodylate. pH 7.2. 2 mM
`C0Cl2. 0.2 mM dithiothreitol, and 1 mM dGTP in a 2 0 4 reaction
`volume for 30 min at 37°C. Under the conditions described, G-tails
`generally contained about 20 bases. One half of the G-tailed product
`was then amplified to clone the VL gene and the other half amplified
`to clone the VH gene, using Taq polymerase. The VL gene was
`amplified with the primers TATATCTAGAATTCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
`CCC and TATAGAGCTCAAGCTTGGATGGTGGGAAGATGGATAC
`AGTTGGTGC, which, respectively, anneal to the G-tail and the K L
`chain C region. The VH gene was amplified similarly, but using the
`downstream primer TATAGAGCTCAAGCTTCCAGTGGATAGAC(C
`AT)GATGGGG(GC)TGT(TC)GTTTTGGC, which anneals to the C
`indicate base
`region of y chains. The sequences in parentheses
`degeneracies, which were introduced so the primer would be able to
`recognize all y chains isotypes. EcoRl and HfndIIl sites were included
`
`in the upstream and downstream primers for convenient subcloning.
`An alternate set of restriction sites (XbaI and SacI) was also included
`in the primers for the rare event that an EcoRI or Hind111 site is
`present in the V region genes. The PCR reactions were performed in
`a programmable heating block using 30 rounds of temperature cy-
`cling (92°C for 1 min. 50°C for 2 min, and 7 2 T for 3 min). The
`reactions included the G-tailed product, 1 pg of each primer. and 2.5
`U of Taq polymerase (Perkin-Elmer Cetus Instruments. Nonvalk, CT)
`in a final volume of 100 pl. with the reaction buffer recommended
`by the manufacturer. The PCR product bands were excised from a
`low melting agarose gel. digested with restriction enzymes.
`and
`cloned into the pUC18 vector for sequence determination.
`Constructfon of expression vectors. pVk [Fig. 2A) was con-
`structed by replacing the EcoRI-XbaI fragment in the p V ~ l plasmid
`(1 1) with a 600-bp FnuDII fragment containing a human CMV
`enhancer and promoter (14), to which appropriate linkers were
`attached. The same fragment was inserted similarly into the pVyl
`plasmid. A fragment in the modified plasmid containing the hyg
`gene was then replaced with a fragment containing a mutant gene
`for dihydrofolate reductase (15) to construct pVgl (Fig. 28). The
`plasmid pVg3 was constructed similarly to pVgl. with a 3400-bp
`HfndIII-PuuII fragment containing the genomic CYs gene (16) replac-
`ing the C,, gene, using linkers so the XbaI and BamHI sites were
`preserved. All reactions were carried out under standard conditions
`(17).
`Constructfon ofchfrnerfcgenes. Togenerate the chimeric L chain
`gene. primers were synthesized which annealed to the 5‘- and 3‘-
`
`

`

`Downloaded from
`
`http://www.jimmunol.org/
`
` by guest on January 24, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`HUMANIZED ANTIBODIES BINDING TO CD33
`
`1151
`
`Ftgure 2. Diagram of plasmid vectors. Cod-
`ing regions are shown as boxes, and important
`restriction sites are indicated. Not drawn to
`scale.
`
`EcoRl
`
`A
`
`Amp
`
`I
`
`I
`
`was determined by ELISA. The best producing clones
`Figure 3 (upper lines). The VL domain belongs to the
`secreted 2.5 pg of chimeric IgGl and 6 pg of chimeric
`mouse K chain subgroup 111 and uses the J,1 segment. The
`IgG3/106 cells/24 h. Chimeric IgGl and IgG3 antibodies
`VH domain belongs to the mouse H chain subgroup I1 and
`secreted into the medium were purified on protein A-
`uses the JH4 segment (20).
`Expression vectors. Plasmid vectors were constructed
`Sepharose. Human IgG3 antibodies generally do not bind
`protein A (25). so the ability of the chimeric IgG3 antibody
`for the expression of chimeric and humanized L and H
`to bind to protein A may be mediated through the V region
`chain genes. The plasmid pVk (Fig. 2A) contains the
`(26). The purified IgGl and IgG3 chimeric antibodies were
`human genomic C, segment (21) including about 300 bp
`analyzed by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 4). There is some heteroge-
`of the preceding intron and the poly(A) signal. The intron
`is preceded by a unique XbaI site into which a L chain V
`neity in the murine and chimeric H chains, which may
`be a result of variable glycosylation.
`region can be cloned. Transcription of the complete L
`Design of humanized M195 V domain. To retain the
`chain gene will be initiated by the strong human CMV
`binding affinity and specificity in the humanized anti-
`major immediate early promoter and enhancer (14). The
`bodies, the general procedures of Queen et al. (1 1) were
`pVk plasmid also contains a selectable marker gene for
`followed. First, a human antibody V region with maximal
`xanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase (gpt) (22).
`sequence homology to the mouse M195 V region was
`Plasmids pVgl (Fig. 2B) and pVg3 for expression of y l
`selected to provide the framework sequences for the hu-
`and 73 H chain genes are similar to pVk but, respectively,
`manized antibodies in order to minimize the chance that
`contain the Cyl and Cy3 C region genes (16, 23) and
`the CDR conformation would be distorted when grafted
`another selectable marker. The H chain C region genes
`onto the human framework. The L and H chain V regions
`are genomic clones that include the CHI, hinge, cH2, and
`were taken from the same human antibody to reduce the
`CH3 exons with the intervening introns and about 200
`possibility of incompatibility in assembly of the two
`bp of the intron preceding CH1. The mutant dihydrofolate
`chains. Based on a sequence homology search against
`reductase selectable marker can be used for gene ampli-
`the National Biomedical Research Foundation Protein
`fication (24).
`Synthesis of chimeric antibodies. PCR with appropri-
`Identification Resource, the Eu antibody was selected to
`provide the framework sequences for humanization of
`ate primers was used to precisely copy the VL region,
`M195. The complete Eu L and H chain V regions are,
`including the signal sequence and J segment, from an
`respectively, 54 and 5 1% homologous to the murine M 195
`M195 L chain cDNA clone. The 5’-PCR primer was de-
`L and H chain V regions.
`signed to insert an XbaI site before the ATG codon. The
`Next, the computer programs ABMOD and ENCAD (27)
`3’-primer was designed to insert the splice donor signal
`that normally follows mouse J,1 in genomic DNA after
`were used to construct a molecular model of the M 195 V
`the J segment, followed by an XbaI site. The PCR- gen-
`domain. Inspection of the refined model of murine M 195
`revealed several amino acid residues in the framework
`erated fragment was then cloned into the XbaI site in the
`pVk vector (Fig. 2A). Doing so created a complete chi-
`which have significant contacts with the CDR residues.
`Specifically, residues Phe-40, Ile-52, and Asp-74 in the L
`meric K L chain gene with a miniintron between the
`chain interact with the CDR. Residues Tyr-27, Thr-30,
`mouse V-J and human C, segments. Similarly, PCR with
`Ile-48, Lys-67, Ala-68, Arg-98, and Trp-106 in the H
`suitable primers was used to insert the M 1 9 5 VH region,
`chain also show significant interactions with the CDR.
`including the signal sequence and J segment and fol-
`lowed by a splice donor signal, into the XbaI sites of pVgl
`These murine residues were retained in
`the V region
`framework of the humanized M 195 antibodies.
`(Fig. 2B) and pVg3. The resulting plasmids contain com-
`Different human L and H chain V regions exhibit sub-
`plete chimeric y l and 73 H chain genes, respectively,
`stantial amino acid homology within the framework re-
`with a miniintron between the mouse V-J segment and
`gions (20). However, a given V region usually contains
`the human CHI exon.
`amino acids atypical of other human V regions at several
`The chimeric L chain-containing plasmid was trans-
`framework positions. The Eu antibody contains such
`fected into Sp2/0 mouse myeloma cells together with
`unusual residues at positions L10, L67, and L110 in the
`either the chimeric y l- or chimeric 73-containing plas-
`L chain and positions H93, H95, H107, H108, and H110
`mid, and cells were selected for expression of the gpt
`in the H chain. At these positions, we chose to use a
`gene. Production of antibody by surviving clones of cells
`
`

`

`1152
`
`HUMANIZED ANTIBODI
`:ES BINDING TO CD33
`
`A
`
`1
`
`I
`
`D I V L T Q S P A S L A V S L G Q R A T
`I
`I
`
`
`I
`I
`I
`
` I
`I
`
`
`I
`I
`I
`I
`D I Q M T Q S P S S L S A S V G D R V T
`
`
`
`21 I S C R A S E S V D N Y G I S F M N W F
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`I T C R A S E S V D N Y G I S F M N W E
`
`41 Q Q K P G Q P P K L L I Y A A S N Q G S
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`Q Q K P G K A P K L L I Y A A S N O G S
`
`61 G V P A R F S G S G S G T D F S L N I H
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`I
`I
`l
`l
`
`I
`G V P S R F S G S G S G T Q F T L T I S
`
`81 P M E E D D T A M Y F C Q Q S K E V P W
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`I 1
`I
`I
`S L Q P D D F A T Y Y C Q O S K E V P W
`
`101 T F G G G T K L E I K
`I
`l
`l
`
`I
`l
`l
`
`I
`l
`l
`
`- T F G Q G T K V E I K
`
`B
`
`1
`
`E V Q L Q Q S G P E L V K P G A S V K I
`I
`l
`l
`
`I
`l
`l
`
`I
`l
`l
`
`I
`I
`l
`l
`
`Q V Q L V Q S G A E V K K P G S S V K V
`
`Q, c
`
`c
`
`c
`
`(3 I
`V
`
`M
`(3 I
`V
`
`c
`
`(3 3 I
`
`M
`c3
`3 I
`
`92
`67
`
`45
`
`22
`
`Ffgure4. SDS-PAGE analysls of M195 antlbodies. 1 pg of each antl-
`body was run on the 10% gel. whlch was stained wlth Coomassle blue.
`LeJt lane. m.w. standards of the lndlcated slzes. CHGI, chlmerlc antlbody
`of IgGl isotype; CHC3. chimeric antlbody of IgG3 isotype: HUGI. human-
`ked antibody of IgGl isotype; HUGS. humanlzed antibody of lgG3 Isotype.
`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://www.jimmunol.org/
`
` by guest on January 24, 2018
`
`TABLE I
`Afffnftfes of MI95 antfbodfes
`K. (XlO' "'1
`
`Antlbody Apparent
`Murlne
`2.21 f 0.73"
`Chimerlc I g G l
`2.28
`5.90 * 1.4"
`0.69 It 0.13"
`Chimerlc IgG3
`Humanlzed IgGl
`Hurnanlzed IcG3
`3.33
`" The average of three independent experiments is shown f the SD.
`
`21 S C K A S G Y T F T D Y N M H W V K Q S
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`S C K A S G Y T F T D Y N M H W V R Q A
`were surrounded by XbaI sites. The DNA segments were
`inserted into the XbaI sites of the appropriate expression
`41 H G K S L E W I G Y I Y P Y N G G T G Y
`vectors (Fig. 2) to produce plasmids containing complete
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`humanized K , y 1, and 73 genes. The humanized L chain-
`P G Q G L E W L G Y I Y P Y N G G T G Y
`containing plasmid was transfected into Sp2/0 cells to-
`gether with either the humanized y l - or humanized y3-
`containing plasmid, and cells were selected for expres-
`sion of the gpt gene. The best antibody-producing clones
`secreted 8 pg of humanized IgGl and 3 pg of humanized
`IgG3/106 cells/24 h. IgG1 antibody secreted into the me-
`dium was purified on protein A-Sepharose. Unlike the
`chimeric IgG3 antibody, the humanized IgG3 antibody
`did not bind protein A. so it was purified on protein G-
`agarose. The humanized IgGl and IgG3 antibodies were
`shown to be pure by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 4). The H chain
`isotypes of the humanized and chimeric antibodies were
`verified by Ouchterlony immunodiffusion.
`Aginity measurements. Flow cytometry was used to
`show that the chimeric and humanized M195 antibodies
`bind to HL60 and U937 cells, which express the CD33
`Ag. but not to several cell lines that do not express CD33
`(data not shown). Binding of the radiolabeled chimeric
`and humanized antibodies to HL60 cells was specific and
`for the CD33 Ag of
`saturable. The apparent affinities
`murine M195 and the various genetic constructs were
`determined by Scatchard analysis (Table I). Murine M 195
`was found to have an apparent K, of 2.2 X lo9 M"
`(Fig.
`5A). consistent with previous results (1). Chimeric IgGl
`M195 has the same apparent affinity as murine M195
`whereas the chimeric IgG3 has a slightly lower apparent
`affinity. Surprisingly, the humanized IgGl M195 anti-
`body has an apparent K, of 5.9 X log M" (Fig. 5B). about
`
`61 N Q K F K S K A T L T V D N S S S T A Y
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`I
`l
`l
`
`I
`N O K F K S g & T I T A D E S T N T A Y
`
`81 M D V R S L T S E D S A V Y Y C A R G R
`I
`I
`
`I
`l
`l
`
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`I
`M E L S S L R S E D T A Y Y X C A R G R
`
`101 P A M D Y W G Q G T S V T V S S
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`P A M D Y E S Q G T L V T V S S
`Ffgure3. Sequences of the humanized M195 llght ( A ) and heavy (B)
`chaln V domalns (lower lfnes). aligned wlth the respectlve murlne M195
`V domalns (upper Ifnes). Vertfcal marks indicate identity of the amino
`aclds. The CDR are underlined. Residues in the Eu framework which
`were replaced by murlne residues or consensus human resldues are
`double underlfned.
`
`consensus human residue rather then the Eu residue in
`the humanized antibody. Several of the unusual residues
`in Eu occur in the H chain J segment, which is signifi-
`cantly mutated from any human genomic JH segment.
`The final amino acid sequences of the humanized M195
`L and H chain V regions are shown in Figure 3. aligned
`with the murine sequences.
`Synthesis of humanized antibodies. DNA segments
`encoding the humanized M195 L and H chain V regions
`were constructed by total gene synthesis from overlap-
`ping oligonucleotides. These genes included signal se-
`quences, J segments, and splice donor sequences and
`
`

`

`1
`
`0.06 1
`
`0.05
`
`0.041
`
`1
`
`0.000
`
`A
`
`/
`
`
`
`. \ .
`
`0.010
`0.005
`0.015
`Bound (nM)
`
`0.020
`
`1153
`HUMANIZED ANTIBODIES BINDING TO CD33
`for the Ag. In contrast, construction of a humanized
`antibody by replacing the mouse V region framework
`with a human framework may alter key contacts between
`the framework and the CDR, which are required to main-
`tain the CDR conformation (30). The altered CDR confor-
`mation may in turn reduce or abolish the binding affinity
`of the antibody for the Ag.
`To retain high affinity when humanizing a mouse an-
`tibody, we have previously introduced two concepts (1 1).
`First, a human framework is selected which maximizes
`homology with the sequence of the mouse antibody V
`region. Such a framework is less likely to introduce dis-
`tortions into the CDR. For the humanized M 195 antibody,
`we chose the framework of the human Eu antibody,
`which we have also used to humanize the anti-Tac and
`anti-gD antibodies (1 1, 12). Eu is used frequently because
`it is the only human antibody having
`an H chain in
`subgroup I for which the sequence of the L chain is also
`available (20). and the H chains of many murine mAb
`are most homologous to human subgroup I. However, we
`have also successfully used the framework of the human
`Pom antibody and of other human antibodies when they
`provide greater homology (12) and (M. S. Co, unpublished
`data). The utility of choosing a homologous human frame-
`work has recently been specifically confirmed by other
`investigators (29).
`In addition to selecting an appropriate human frame-
`work, we use a computer model of the murine antibody
`to identify a small number of amino acids in the mouse
`framework which make key contacts with the
`CDR.
`These residues are retained in the humanized antibody.
`In humanized M195, three L chain and seven H chain
`murine residues were kept for this reason. It may be
`argued that the mouse framework amino acids will make
`the humanized antibody more immunogenic when used
`in human patients. However, when humanized anti-Tac,
`which incorporates a number of murine framework res-
`idues, was tested in cynomolgus monkeys, any monkey
`antibody response was directed to the anti-Tac CDR and
`not to the framework (31). For the fully humanized anti-
`bodies that have been examined (CAMPATH-1 (10). anti-
`respiratory syncytial virus (281, anti-CD4 (291, and anti-
`Tac (W. Schneider and c. Q., unpublished data)) using a
`homologous human framework or retaining some murine
`framework residues or both have been shown to be crit-
`ical for retaining high binding affinity. For the M195
`antibody, these methods actually
`led to a humanized
`antibody with higher apparent binding affinity, as deter-
`mined by Scatchard analysis, than the mouse or chimeric
`antibodies. Elsewhere, we have also directly verified the
`increased apparent binding affinity of humanized M 195
`relative to murine M195 by competition binding of one
`antibody against the other4 (36). The reason for the in-
`crease in affinity of M195 upon humanization is under
`investigation but may relate to a change in glycosylation
`patterns.
`Initial animal and clinical studies with chimeric and
`humanized antibodies have been encouraging. Human-
`ized CAMPATH- 1 has induced remissions in two patients
`with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (32) and one patient with
`Caron. P. C.. M. S. Co. M. K. Bull. N. M. Avdalovic, C. Queen, and D.
`Scheinberg. 1991. Humanized M195 (anti-CD33) monoclonal antibodies:
`potential for therapy of myelogenous leukemia. Subrnlttedfor publlca-
`tion.
`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://www.jimmunol.org/
`
` by guest on January 24, 2018
`
`0
`0 . 0 0 ~ " " ~ ~ " ' ' ~ "
`0.000
`0.005
`0.010
`0.01 5
`Bound (nM)
`
`0.020
`
`Flgure 5. Representative Scatchard analyses of binding of '251-labeled
`murine ( A ) and humanized IgGl (B) M195 antibodies to HL60 cells.
`
`%fold higher than murine M195. The affinity determi-
`nations of the murine M 195 and humanized IgGl anti-
`bodies were performed three times to verify this finding,
`each time with very similar results [Table I]. The human-
`ized IgG3 antibody has an apparent
`affinity slightly
`higher than the murine antibody but not as high as the
`humanized IgGl form. Repeating the experiments sug-
`gested that the chimeric and humanized IgG3 antibodies
`were not completely stable in solution over time.
`
`DISCUSSION
`To date, a multitude of chimeric antibodies and at least
`seven fully humanized antibodies have been described.
`The humanized antibodies, respectively, bind to the pan-
`lymphocyte CAMPATH-1 Ag (101, the p55 chain of the
`IL-2 receptor (1 1). the gB and gD glycoproteins of herpes-
`virus (12). the fusion protein
`of respiratory syncytial
`virus (28). the CD4 Ag (29) and, as described here, the
`CD33 Ag. Because the V and C regions of antibodies are
`independent protein domains (20), it is possible to con-
`struct a chimeric antibody
`by replacing the mouse C
`region with a human C region without altering the con-
`formation of the V region, including the CDR. Hence,
`chimeric antibodies generally retain full binding affinity
`
`

`

`Downloaded from
`
`http://www.jimmunol.org/
`
` by guest on January 24, 2018
`
`1154
`
`
`
`
`
`HUMANIZED ANTIBODIES
`
`BINDING TO CD33
`
`Acknowledgments. We would like to thank H. Selick
`for participating in the construction
`of the expression
`vectors, P. Payne for assistance in the antibody modeling,
`and M. K. Bull for technical assistance.
`
`12. Co. M. S., M. Deschamps. R. J. Whitley, and C. Queen. 1991.
`systemic vasculitis (33), without inducing an antibody
`Humanized antibodies for antiviral therapy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sct.
`response. The chimeric 17- 1 A antibody has displayed a
`USA 88:2869.
`longer half-life and reduced immunogenicity
`in colon
`13. Loh, E. Y., J. F. Elliott, S. Cwirla, L. L. Lanier. and M. M. Davis.
`1989. Polymerase chain reaction with single-sided specificity: analy-
`cancer patients relative to the original mouse antibody
`sis of T cell receptor d chain. Science 243:217.
`(7). Humanized anti-Tac has shown increased half-life,
`14. Boshart, M.. F. Weber, G. Jahn. K. Dorsch-Hasler. B. Fleckenstein,
`reduced and delayed immunogenicity, and improved ef-
`and W. S

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket