throbber
Long-Term Trials of Deferiprone in
`Cooley’s Anemiaa
`
`NANCY F. OLIVIERI,b,d,e AND GARY M. BRITTENHAMc
`bDepartments of Medicine and Pediatrics, University of Toronto,
`Canada
`cDepartment of Medicine, MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western
`Reserve University, Cleveland, USA
`
`ABSTRACT: Deferoxamine is the currently available agent for the iron-chelation ther-
`apy required by Cooley’s anemia patients. The difficulties associated with parenteral
`administration have mandated a search for alternative therapies, especially orally
`active iron chelators, to remove excess iron that results in damage to the liver,
`endocrine organs, and heart. Four orally active agents have reached clinical trials in
`the last decade. The agent under consideration in this paper, deferiprone (1,2-
`dimethyl-3-hydroxypyridin-4-one), has shown some promise, but, according to the
`studies discussed here, may not provide adequate sustained control of body iron in a
`substantial proportion of Cooley’s anemia patients.
`
`In patients with Cooley’s anemia and hereditary hemochromatosis, excess iron acquired
`
`through transfusions or absorption results in damage to the liver, endocrine organs and
`heart.1 Several studies have highlighted the importance of sustained reduction of body
`iron burden as the principal determinant of clinical outcome in these disorders.2–5 While
`venesection can effectively and safely reduce body iron in individuals homozygous for
`hereditary hemochromatosis,2 patients with Cooley’s anemia require life-long chelating
`therapy to promote the excretion of iron accumulated from transfusions.6 The only iron-
`chelating agent available for clinical use is deferoxamine, long-term compliance which
`with prevents the complications of iron overload, and improves survival, in Cooley’s ane-
`mia.4,7 The difficulties associated with parenteral administration of deferoxamine have
`mandated a search for safe and effective therapeutic alternatives, including orally active
`iron chelators,1 four of which have reached clinical teals in the past decade. The com-
`pounds N,N’-bis (2-hydroxybenzoyl) ethylenediamine N,N’-diacetic acid (HBED), the
`aryl hydrazone pyridoxal isonicotinoyl hydrazone (PIH), and the diethyl hydroxypyridi-
`none CP94, have all been evaluated in short-term trials over the last five years, but are
`not under clinical development at this time.6 The orally active iron-chelating agent most
`extensively evaluated to date is 1,2-dimethyl-3-hydroxypyridin-4-one (deferiprone; L1),
`
`aSupported in part by research grants from: The Medical Research Council of Canada, The Ontario
`Heart and Stroke Foundation, The Ontario Thalassemia Foundation, APOTEX Inc., The United States
`Cooley’s Anemia Foundation, The National Institutes of Health Grants #HL 42824 and AI 35827, and
`The Food and Drug Administration Orphan Products Grant FD-R-000532.
`dAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. N.F. Olivieri, The Hospital for Sick Children,
`Division of Hematology, University Of Toronto, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
`M5G 1X8; Tel: (416) 813-6823; Fax: (416) 813-5346; E-mail: noliv@sickkids.on.ca
`eDr. Olivieri is a recipient of a Scientist Award from the Medical Research Council of Canada.
`
`217
`
`Apotex Tech.
`Ex. 2013
`
`

`

`218
`
`ANNALS NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
`
`one of the 3-hydroxypyridin-4-one iron chelators patented in 1982 as an potential alter-
`native to deferoxamine for the treatment of chronic iron overload.8
`Animal studies of deferiprone have reported variable efficacy in rodents and rabbits,
`and insufficient efficacy for maintenance of negative iron balance in iron-loaded primates.6
`In transfused patients with Cooley’s anemia, 75 milligrams of deferiprone per kilogram
`body weight induces urinary iron excretion approximately equivalent to that achieved with
`30–40 milligrams of deferoxamine per kilogram.1,9,10 Because fecal iron excretion induced
`by deferiprone is much less than that by deferoxamine,9,10 the short-term efficacy of
`deferiprone is acknowledged to be inferior to that of deferoxamine.
`
`Effectiveness of Deferiprone as Estimated by Serum Ferritin Concentration
`
`While the earliest studies reported no sustained decrease in serum ferritin concentration
`over one to 15 months of deferiprone therapy,11,12 two short-term trials subsequently
`reported statistically significant reductions in mean serum ferritin concentration in patients
`with Cooley’s anemia, with the most substantial declines observed in patients whose pre-
`study ferritin concentrations exceeded 5000 µg/L.13,14 As previously noted, reliance on
`changes in the concentration of serum ferritin alone may lead to inaccurate assessment of
`body iron burden in individual patients; direct assessment of tissue iron is crucial in the
`evaluation of any new potential iron-chelating agent.6 Such studies therefore could not
`establish convincingly the efficacy of deferiprone in the reduction of body iron burden.
`
`Effectiveness of Deferiprone as Estimated by Hepatic Iron Concentration
`
`Reduction in hepatic iron stores during deferiprone therapy was first demonstrated in a
`patient with thalassemia “intermedia.”15 In a subsequent study in patients with Cooley’s ane-
`mia unable or unwilling to use deferoxamine, short-term deferiprone treatment was shown
`to reduce hepatic storage iron in many patients over three years.16 As emphasized at the time
`of that report, the long-term effectiveness of this agent remained undetermined.17
`To assess the effectiveness of deferiprone in the long-term control of body iron in
`Cooley’s anemia we have continued to determine hepatic iron concentration in these
`patients, in whom results through June 1994 were reported previously.16 As of June 1996,
`18 of 21 patients remain evaluable; one patient interrupted deferiprone for 0.7 years, and
`two patients stopped deferiprone after one year. These 18 patients constitute the only
`group worldwide to receive long-term deferiprone in conjunction with serial measure-
`ments of hepatic iron concentration to accurately determine body iron. As in our previ-
`ously reported analysis,16 hepatic iron concentration, determined in tissue obtained at
`biopsy or by magnetic susceptometry,4 was the primary endpoint of effectiveness. The
`criteria used are those derived from long-term studies of morbidity and mortality associ-
`ated with increasing concentrations of hepatic storage iron in vivo.2–5,18 These will be
`briefly reviewed.
`Information about the risks associated with lower levels of body iron arises from expe-
`rience in patients heterozygous for the iron-loading disorder hereditary hemochromatosis,
`in a proportion of whom maintenance of modestly elevated concentrations of hepatic iron
`(approximately 3.2 to 7 milligrams iron per gram liver, dry weight) is associated with nor-
`mal life expectancy and no evidence of iron-induced toxicity.18 Individuals with body iron
`burdens above this range, and up to about 15 milligrams iron per gram liver, dry weight,
`are at an increased risk of hepatic fibrosis and other complications of iron overload.2,3,5
`
`

`

`OLIVIERI & BRITTENHAM: LONG-TERM DEFERIPRONE TRIALS
`
`219
`
`Patients who sustain hepatic storage iron concentrations exceeding 15 milligrams iron per
`gram liver, dry weight have a greatly heightened risk of cardiac disease and early death.4
`Accordingly, patients who reduce and maintain hepatic storage iron concentrations within
`the range of 3.2 to 7 milligrams iron per gram liver, dry weight are considered to have
`maintained body storage iron within optimal range while receiving deferiprone. Patients in
`whom long-term chelating therapy fails to maintain hepatic storage iron in this range are
`considered to be at risk for iron-induced complications of iron overload. Finally, those
`patients in whom therapy fails to maintain hepatic storage iron below 15 milligrams iron
`per gram liver, dry weight, are considered to be at risk of cardiac disease and early death.4
`Although support for Toronto’s long-term trial was terminated prematurely in 1996 by
`the corporate sponsor, continued follow-up of hepatic storage iron concentrations has pro-
`vided information regarding the long-term effectiveness of deferiprone in Cooley’s ane-
`mia. Our most recent analysis of this cohort shows that, in one-third of patients, hepatic
`iron concentrations presently exceed the threshold associated with increased risk of heart
`disease and early death in Cooley’s anemia.4 Of the 16 patients with a hepatic iron con-
`centration below this threshold when previously reported,16 the hepatic iron concentration
`now exceeds the threshold in four patients (p = 0.05); in the two other patients, the hepatic
`iron concentration has continued to exceed the threshold during 2.3 and 3.9 years of
`deferiprone, respectively. In these six patients. mean compliance with deferiprone exceed-
`ing 90% drug taken of that prescribed.19 Another interpretation of these data has recently
`been presented.20,21
`In parallel, investigators in the United Kingdom reported the results of deferiprone ther-
`apy over 42.5 months (range, 8 to 56 months) in 42 patients with Cooley’s anemia aged
`29.9 years (range, 20 to 58 years).22,23 No significant declines in serum ferritin concentra-
`tion were reported in these patients over this period of therapy. In the 17 patients in whom
`hepatic iron concentrations were determined after therapy, concentrations exceeded the
`threshold for cardiac disease and early death4 in ten patients. The conclusion of this analy-
`sis is similar to those in the Canadian study:19 the U.K. investigators have now concluded
`that “long-term therapy with deferiprone may not provide adequate control of body iron in
`a substantial proportion of patients with thalassemia major.”22,23
`In summary, two interpretation of the results obtained from the only centers to quanti-
`tatively determine body iron burden in patients receiving long-term deferiprone therapy
`raise concerns that long-term deferiprone may not provide adequate sustained control of
`body iron in a substantial proportion of patients with Cooley’s anemia.19,22,23
`
`Toxicity Studies
`
`As detailed previously,6 deferiprone did not receive full formal toxicologic evaluation
`before being given to humans; permission to administer the drug in early studies in the
`United Kingdom, India, Europe and Canada was granted on the basis of limited toxicity
`studies in rodents. Adrenal hypertrophy, gonadal and thymic atrophy, bone marrow atrophy
`and pancytopenia, growth retardation, and embryotoxicity have also been reported in ani-
`mals. In humans, the most common adverse effect associated with administration of
`deferiprone has been arthralgias, primarily of the large joints, the etiology of which remains
`elusive.6 The most serious adverse effect associated with the administration of deferiprone
`has been severe neutropenia or agranulocytosis, first reported in 1989.24 To date, this com-
`plication has been reported in several patients, most with Cooley’s anemia, as early as six
`weeks and up to 21 months after the initiation of deferiprone. The mechanism of
`
`

`

`220
`
`ANNALS NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
`
`deferiprone-induced neutropenia is unknown; this adverse effect appears not to be dose-
`dependent, but idiosyncratic and unpredictable.6
`No study of long-term toxicity of deferiprone has been conducted. Monitoring of the
`safety of deferiprone in most prospective studies continues to be directed to abnormali-
`ties reported in animal studies.23–29 Treatment of iron-loaded Mongolian gerbils with a
`hydroxypyridinone closely related to deferiprone (1,2-diethyl-3-hydroxypyridin-4-one)
`has been associated with the acceleration of hepatic fibrosis and the development of car-
`diac fibrosis in these animals, the only species which develops hemochromatosis of the liver
`and heart in the same manner as patients with Cooley’s anemia.29 While hepatic iron accu-
`mulation was inhibited during co-administration of 1,2-diethyl-3-hydroxypyridin-4-one
`over the short-term in the gerbils, hepatic iron increased significantly during extended drug
`administration.29 Of further concern, accelerated fibrosis was noted in both the livers and
`hearts of animals in which 1,2-diethyl-3-hydroxypyridin-4-one was co-administered with
`iron, compared to animals treated with iron alone. These observations, and the theoretical
`concerns with respect to the toxicity of a bidentate ligand, discussed elsewhere in this vol-
`ume, have raised concerns as to whether long-term deferiprone therapy may be associated
`with worsening of hepatic fibrosis, and cardiac iron loading and fibrosis, in humans.
`By oversight, in this and all other trials of deferiprone worldwide, hepatic histology has
`never been evaluated prospectively in patients receiving long-term therapy. As well, the
`effect of deferiprone on cardiac iron loading and fibrosis has not been been the primary
`endpoint of any prospective trial. Nevertheless, the studies by the group in the United
`Kingdom have provided indirect information regarding cardiac disease in patients with
`Cooley’s anemia treated with long-term deferiprone. In this long-term treatment cohort,23
`18 of 42 patients left the study, a dropout rate of 43 percent. Review of these 18 patients
`shows that five dropouts had died, four of cardiac disease, while on deferiprone therapy,
`while another patient withdrew from treatment because of tachycardia. In all the study
`dropouts, mean initial serum ferritin concentration, which exceeded 4,500 µg/L, report-
`edly did not change significantly during deferiprone therapy.23 These data underscore the
`concerns that long-term deferiprone may not adequately reduce body iron burden below
`concentrations that are associated with an increased risk of cardiac disease and early death
`in Cooley’s anemia,4 confirming the findings summarized above.19,22,23
`In summary, data from two centers conducting long-term trials of deferiprone support
`our previous conclusion that “long-term therapy with deferiprone may not provide ade-
`quate control of body iron in a substantial proportion of patients with thalassemia
`major.”19 Further prospective trials may be indicated to address these potential toxicities
`of deferiprone.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1. BRITTENHAM, G. M. 1992. Development of iron-chelating agents for clinical use. Blood 80:
`569–574.
`2. NIEDERAU, C., R. FISCHER, A. SONNENBERG et al. 1985. Survival and causes of death in cirrhotic
`and in noncirrhotic patients with primary hemochromatosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 313: 1256–1262.
`3. LOREAL, O., Y. DEUGNIER, R. MOIRAND et al. 1992. Liver fibrosis in genetic hemochromatosis.
`Respective roles of iron and non-iron related factors in 127 homozygous patients. J. Hepatol.
`16: 122–127.
`4. BRITTENHAM, G. M., P. M. GRIFFITH, A. W. NIENHUIS et al. 1994. Efficacy of deferoxamine in
`preventing complications of iron overload in patients with thalassemia major. N. Engl. J. Med.
`331: 567–573.
`5. NIEDERAU, C., R. FISCHER, W. STREMMEL et al. 1996. Long-term survival in patients with hered-
`itary hemochromatosis. Gastroenterology 110: 1107–1119.
`
`

`

`OLIVIERI & BRITTENHAM: LONG-TERM DEFERIPRONE TRIALS
`
`221
`
`6. OLIVIERI, N. F. & G. M. BRITTENHAM. 1997. Iron-chelating therapy and the treatment of tha-
`lassemia. Blood 89: 739–761.
`7. OLIVIERI, N. F., D. G. NATHAN, J. H. MACMILLAN et al. 1994. Survival in medically treated
`patients with homozygous β thalassemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 331: 574–578.
`8. HIDER, R. C., G. J. KONTOGHIORGHES, J. SILVER. 1982. U.K. patent GB-2118176.
`9. OLIVIERI, N. F., G. KOREN, C. HERMANN et al. 1990. Comparison of oral iron chelator L1. and
`desferrioxamine in iron-loaded patients. Lancet 336: 1275–1279.
`10. COLLINS, A. F., F. F. FASSOS, S. S. STOBIE et al. 1994. Iron balance and dose response studies of
`the oral iron chelator 1,2-dimethyl-3-hydroxypyrid-4-one (L1) in iron-loaded patients with
`sickle cell disease. Blood 83: 2329–2333.
`11. KONTOGHIORGHES, G. J., A. N. BARTLETT, A. V. HOFFBRAND et al. 1990. Long-term trial with the
`oral iron chelator 1,2-dimethyl-3-hydroxypyrid-4-one (L1). Br. J. Haematol. 76: 295–304.
`12. TONDURY, P., G. J. KONTOGHIORGHES, A. R. RIDOLFI-LUTHY et al. 1990. L1. (1,2-dimethyl-3-
`hydroxypyrd-4-one) for oral iron chelation in patients with beta-thalassaemia major. Br. J.
`Haematol. 76: 550–553.
`13. AL-REFAIE, F. N., B. WONKE, A. V. HOFFBRAND et al. 1992. Efficacy and possible adverse effects
`of the oral iron chelator 1,2-dimethyl-3-hydroxypyrid-4-one (L1) in Cooley’s anemia. Blood
`80: 592–599.
`14. AGARWAL, M. B., S. S. GUPTE, C. VISWANATHAN et al. 1992. Long-term assessment of efficacy
`and safety of L1, an oral iron chelator, in transfusion-dependent thalassemia: Indian trial. Br.
`J. Haematol. 82: 460–466.
`15 OLIVIERI, N. F., D. MATSUI, G. KOREN et al. 1992. Reduction of tissue iron stores and normal-
`ization of serum ferritin during treatment with the oral iron chelator L1 in thalassemia inter-
`media. Blood 79: 2741-2748.
`16. OLIVERI, N. F., G. M. BRITTENHAM, D. MATSUI et al. 1995. Iron chelation therapy with oral
`deferiprone in patients with thalassemia major. N. Engl. J. Med. 332: 918–922.
`17. NATHAN, D. G. An orally active iron chelator. 1995. N. Engl. J. Med. 332: 953–954.
`18. CARTWRIGHT, G. E., C. Q. EDWARDS, K. KRAVITZ et al. 1979. Hereditary hemochromatosis:
`Phenotypic expression of the disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 301: 175–179.
`19. OLIVIERI, N. F., Iron Chelation Research Group. 1996. Long-term follow-up of body iron in
`patients with thalassemia major during therapy with the orally active iron chelator deferiprone
`(L1) [abstract]. Blood 88: 310a.
`20. TRICTA, F., G. SHER, R. LOEBSTEIN et al. 1997. Long-term chelation therapy with the orally active
`iron chelator deferiprone (L1) in patients with thalassemia major [abstract]. Presented at the
`Sixth International Conference on Thalassaemia and the Haemoglobinopathies & Eight
`Annual Thalassaemia Parent and Thalassaemics International Conference. St. Paul’s Bay,
`Malta, April 5–10, 1997.
`21. DOGHERTY, P., T. EINARSON, G. KOREN & G. SHER. 1997. The effectiveness of deferiprone in tha-
`lassemia [letter]. Blood 90: 894.
`22. HOFFBRAND, A.V., B. WONKE, F. AL-REFAIE et al. 1996. Over 3 year follow up of 56 transfusion
`dependent patients receiving oral iron chelation [abstract]. Blood 88: 651a.
`23. HOFFBRAND, A.V. & B. WONKE. 1997. Long term follow-up of 42 regularly transfused thalas-
`saemia patients treated with deferiprone [abstract]. Presented at the Sixth International
`Conference on Thalassaemia and the Haemoglobinopathies & Eight Annual Thalassaemia
`Parent and Thalassaemics International Conference. St. Paul’s Bay, Malta, April 5–10, 1997.
`24. HOFFBRAND, A. V., A. N. BARTLETT, P. P. VEYS et al. 1989. Agranulocytosis and thrombocytope-
`nia in patients with Blackfan-Diamond anaemia during oral chelator trial [letter]. Lancet 2:
`457–458.
`25. PORTER, J. B., J. MORGAN, K. P. HOYES et al. 1990. Relative oral efficacy and acute toxicity of
`hydroxypyridin-4-one iron chelators in mice. Blood 76: 2389–2396.
`26. PORTER, J. B., K. P. HOYES, R. D. ABEYSINGHE et al. 1991. Comparison of the subacute toxicity
`and efficacy of 3-hydroxypyridin-4-one iron chelators in overloaded and nonoverloaded mice.
`Blood 78: 2727–2734.
`27. BIESEMEIER, J. A. & J. LAVEGLIA. 1991. 14-day oral toxicity study in dogs with 1.2-dimethyl-3-
`hydroxypyrid-4-one (DMHP, L1). Food and Drug Research Laboratories, Waverly, NY,
`Contract No. N01-DK-4-2255, NIDDK, NIH, USA.
`
`

`

`222
`
`ANNALS NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
`
`28. BERGERON, R. J., R. R. STREIFF, J. WEIGAND et al. 1992. A comparison of the iron-clearing prop-
`erties of 1,2-dimethyl-3-hydroxypyrid-4-one. 1,2-diethyl-3-hydroxypyrid-4-one, and deferox-
`amine. Blood 79: 1882–1890.
`29. SCHNEBLI, H. P. 1993. Final Report, Pre-clinical evaluation of CGP 37–391 (L1). Pharmaceutical
`Division, Ciba-Geigy Biology Report ERS 62/93; 30 pp.
`30. CARTHEW, P., A. G. SMITH, R. C. HIDER et al. 1994. Potentiation of iron accumulation in cardiac
`myocytes during the treatment of iron overload with the hydroxypyridinone iron chelator
`CP94. BioMetals 7: 267–271.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket