throbber
Abstracts of the 42nd Annual Meeting ofthe American Society of Hematology, December1 - 5,
`2000, The Moscone Center, San Francisco, CA
`
`[2601] CARDIAC IRON DEPOSITION IS NOT PREDICTED BY CONVENTIONAL
`MARKERSOF IRON OVERLOAD IN HOMOZYGOUS B-THALASSAEMIA.
`Lisa Anderson, John B. Porter, Beatrix Wonke, J. Malcolm Walker, Sally Holden, Bernard A. Davis, Emma
`Prescott, Clare Charrier, DavidN. Firmin, Dudley J. Pennell (Intr. by Rosemary E. Gale}. Cardiac MR Unit,
`Royal Brompton Hospital, London; Departments ofHaematology and Cardiology, University College London
`Hospitals, London; Department ofHaematology, The Whittington Hospital, London.
`Monday, December 4, 2000, 10:00 AM, Hall C, Poster Board Number65
`The managementofiron overload requires the identification of patients at highestrisk of heart failure, the
`commonest cause of death in thalassaemia major. Becauseit has not previously been possible to estimate
`cardiac iron deposition non-invasively and reproducibly, managementhasrelied upon assessment of other
`variables. Thus while wholeliver iron levels >15mg/g dry weight or serum ferritin values consistently
`>2500ng/I have been shownto predictpatients at highest risk of cardiac death,it is not known how these
`variables relate to cardiac iron deposition. We report the relationship between myocardial andliver iron,
`measured by magnetic resonance, in 151 regularly transfused patients with homozygous B-thalassemia. We
`measured T2*,an inherent value of any tissue which is inversely related to iron concentration. This
`measurement gives a high degree of reproducibility in both the liver (coefficient of variation=3.3%) and the
`heart (coefficient of variation=5.0%). Liver T2* correlated with liver iron measured at biopsy (r=0.93,
`p<0.0001, n=13 for non-fibrotic samples and 1=0.81, p<0.0001 and n=30 forall samples), but there was a
`striking discordance between myocardial iron deposition and liver iron or serum ferritin in many patients.
`Althoughthe correlations betweenliver T2* and heart T2* (r=0.19, p=0.02) and serum ferritin and heart T2*
`(r=0.14, p=0.01) achievedstatistical significance in this large cohort, the scatter was great. No significant
`relationship could be demonstrated betweenliver iron andleft ventricular ejection fraction (r=0.11, p=0.19) or
`serum ferritin and left ventricular ejection fraction (r=0.032, p=0.70). There wasalso no significant relationship
`between mean serum ferritin for one year prior to the scan and myocardial T2* (r=0.13, p=0.11) or ejection
`fraction (0.001, p=0.98). The highly variable relationship betweenliver and heart ironis likely to reflect
`differences in chelation history between patients as well as differences in the rates at which iron is taken up and
`removed from hepatocytes and myocytes. We conclude that neither serum ferritin or liver iron measurements
`usefully predict those patients with increased myocardialiron deposition.
`Keywords: B-Thalassemia;Iron overload
`
`Poster Session: Thalassemia & Globin Gene Regulation: Switching/Clinical Studies (10:00 AM-6:30 PM)
`
`Supported by an unrestricted educational grant from AstraZeneca.
`Page 1
`
`Apotex Tech.
`Ex. 2007
`
`Apotex Tech.
`Ex. 2007
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket