throbber
British Journal of Haematology, 199 3. 85, 430-4 33
`
`Correspondence
`
`DEATHS CN PATIBNTS RECEIVING ORAL IRON CHELATOR Ll
`
`Agarwal el al (1992) reported four deaths in Indian thalas(cid:173)
`saemics while on the oral iron chelator Ll or shortly after
`discontinuing it. While their conclusion was that none of the
`deaths was related to Ll in any way. despite our evidence to
`the contrary in one of them (Mehta et al. 1991 ). new evidence
`(Berdoukas et al. 1993) would appear to suggest otherwise.
`Preclinical animal studies have shown thymic and other
`organ atrophy in rats at doses of I 00 mg/kg or more
`(Berdoukas et al, 1993). One of the patients from the group of
`Agarwal et al (1992), who died of overwhelming varicella
`infection in Philadelphia. was found to have thymic atrophy
`(Berdoukas et al. 1993). It is quite likely that the fatal
`varicella infection was the result of Ll -induced atrophy of
`lymphatic organs and immunosuppression.
`Another splenectomized patient who had not been vacci(cid:173)
`nated against pneumococcus and who was not on penicillin
`prophylaxis died of pyogenic meningitis. The third patient.
`who was vaccinated against pneumococcus prior to splenec(cid:173)
`tomy and was on peniciUin prophylaxis, died of an acute
`gastrointestinal infection with possible encephalitis within
`24 h of presentation. The causative organism in either case. if
`identified. was not mentioned. Even if the organism was
`pneumococcus. it is possible that LI-induced immunosup(cid:173)
`pression (and resultant hypogammaglobulinaemia) could
`have increased the patients' susceptibility to the infections.
`The death of the fourth patient was attributed to cardiac
`failure, arrhythmia. urinary sepsis. and septicaemia by
`Agarwal et al (1992). As physicians who looked after the
`patient during his terminal illness. we have reported our
`strong belief that the patient died of consequences of Ll(cid:173)
`induced systemic lupus erythematosus (Mehta et al. 199 I).
`There was no documented cardiac arrhythmia, and the
`symptoms of the urinary tract infection had improved on
`therapy prior to death. The blood pressure of 170/ 120
`recorded 10 min prior to death is incompatible with septic
`shock. Berdoukas {l 991) initially felt that the death may
`have been due to the cardiac effects of the high-dose
`methylprednisolone that the patient was receiving. but has
`now hypothesized (Berdoukas et al. 1993) that cardiac
`dysfunction may have been precipitated or potentiated by Ll(cid:173)
`induced redistribution of iron.
`We believe that there is reasonable evidence to implicate
`L 1 directly or indirectly in at least three of the four deaths. rt is
`important to make all views pubµc now because of the debate
`on the future ofLl that is sure to follow the announcement of
`Ciba-Geigy that further development of the drug is not
`justified in view of its toxicity (Berdoukas et al, l 993 ), and the
`
`subsequent statement from the International Study Group on
`Oral Iron Chelation that this is premature (Hershko. 199 3).
`
`Blood Research Centre,
`Vivina Building 3A.
`S V Road,
`Bombay 400 058,
`India
`
`REFERENCES
`
`}AYESH MEHTA
`SEEMA SINGHAL
`B. c. MEHTA
`
`Agarwal. M.B .. Gupte. S.S .. Viswanathan. C .. Vasandani. D .. Rama(cid:173)
`nathan. J .. Desai. N .. Puniyani. R.R. & Chhablani. A.T. {l 992)
`Long-term assessment of efficacy and safety of LI. an oral iron
`chelator. in transfusion dependent thalassaemia: Indian trial.
`British Journal of Haematology, 82. 460-466.
`Berdoukas. V. ( 1991) Antinuclear antibodies in patients taking Ll.
`Lancet, 337. 672.
`Berdoukas: V .. Bentley. P .. Prost. H. & Schnebli. H.P. ( 1993) Toxieity
`of oral iron chelator f,l. Lancet. 341, J 088.
`Hershko. C. (1993) Development of oral iron chelator LI. l,am:et.
`341, 1088- 1089.
`Mehta. J .. Singhal. S .. Revankar. R .. Walvalkar. A., Chablani. A. &
`Mehta. B.C. (1991) Pata! systemic lupus erythematosus in patient
`taking oral iron chelator Ll. Lancet. 337, 298.
`
`In developing countries. iron chelation is not available to
`thalassaemics because of its high cost. lnadequate blood
`transfusions and splenectomies are common. As a result.
`most thalassaemics succumb to iron overload or infections
`during their late second decade. At our centre. analysis of
`360 thalassaemics, monitored over 8 years (1983-90).
`showed cardiac failure and infections including pyogenic
`meningitis as the main mode of death. which occurred in 52
`subjects (Agarwal, 1986 ).
`Four thalassaemic patients on Ll. who died during our
`initial trial. belonged to the age group 15- I 8 years (Agarwal
`et al. 1992aJ. Their serum ferritin ranged from 8300 to
`12800 ng/ ml (Agarwal et al. 1992a). All of them were
`splenectomized and their mode of death was either iron(cid:173)
`related cardiac failure or infection and in no way different
`from thalassaemics dying elsewhere in India.
`Mehta et al have hypothesized that these deaths may be due
`to LI-related immuno-paralysis. Their hypothesis is based on
`animal work carried out by Ciba-Geigy as well as the presence
`of thymic atrophy in one of our patients who was on Ll
`(Berdoukas et al. 1993).
`
`430
`
`
`1 of 1
`
`Taro Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.
`Exhibit 1033
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket