throbber
LONDON, SATURDAY 23 NOVEMBER 1991
`
`Oral iron chelation is here
`
`New oral chelation agents are challenging desferrioxamine
`
`Iron overload is a potentially fatal disorder, damaging the
`heart, liver, and other organs. It may be due to repeated blood
`transfusions or increased gastrointestinal absorption of iron,
`or both-as occurs in the~ thalassaemias. In patients given
`regular transfusions signs of organ damage (secondary haemo(cid:173)
`chromatosis) become apparent when around 50-100 units of
`red blood cells have been given: at that time about 10-20 g of
`extra storage iron has been introduced into the body, six to 13
`times the amount stored in normal people. Patients with
`primary haemochromatosis absorb excess iron from the diet.
`This amounts to far less iron than those having regular
`transfusions, but in time they still accumulate a lethal
`overload unless treated by venesection.
`Patients with transfusional iron overload need treatment by
`chelation. Most such patients have a haemoglobinopathy.
`Around 250 million people are heterozygotes with one of
`the haemoglobinopathies, and about 200 000 are born each
`year with potentially lethal homozygous thalassaemia or sickle
`cell anaemia. Most of the 100 000 with thalassaemia have one
`of the~ variants,' and these patients can be maintained in good
`health by repeated transfusion and chelation from the first
`year of life. Even without chelation regular transfusion can
`prolong life to around 20 years-as opposed to death within
`three years of birth without treatment.
`Many other conditions are- or should be- treated by
`chelation to prevent overload with iron from repeated trans(cid:173)
`fusions. These include not only sickle cell anaemia but also
`aplastic anaemia, myelodysplasia/myelofibrosis, and, in some
`cases, chronic renal failure. 1 Desferrioxamine has been the
`mainstay of iron (and aluminium) chelation for the past I 5
`years. It is generally effective and non-toxic, but because of its
`high cost, the cumbersome subcutaneous method of adminis(cid:173)
`tration, and toxic side effects only a small fraction of patients
`requiring chelation worldwide receive it. In India, for
`example, less than 5% of patients with f) thalassaemia major
`could afford treatment with desferrioxamine.
`What, then, about other chelators? Those such as EDT A
`and diethylenetriaminepenta-acetic acid, which are not selec(cid:173)
`tive for iron because of their carboxylic acid binding site,
`increase the excretion of zinc and magnesium, making them
`toxic. A new group of chelators, the a-ketohydroxypyridines,
`has many advantages, including a high affinity for iron; a high
`selectivity for iron over other biologically important metals;
`stability in acidic and physiological conditions because of its
`heteroaromatic structure; ability to cross the cell membrane
`because of its neutral charge and the formation of neutral iron
`
`complexes; and ability to remove iron from transferrin,
`ferritin, and haemosiderin. ~ Several of this group of chelators
`have been shown to be effective in removing iron from mice,
`rats, rabbits, and monkeys, but only a few have been shown to
`be safe when given long term to animals. One of these, 1,2
`dirnethyl-3-hydroxypyrid-4-one (LI), has been shown in the
`past five years to be of comparable efficacy to desferrioxamine
`in increasing the urinary excretion of iron in patients with
`thalassaemia and myelodysplasia.' The effectiveness of LI in
`increasing iron excretion has been confirmed in centres
`around the world in trials of daily administration for up to 15
`months.s-s
`Pharmacokinetic studies have shown that orally adminis(cid:173)
`tered LI is ahsorhed from the stomach and enters the systemic
`circulation through the liver with a halflife of O· 7-32 minutes,
`is metabolised in the liver to a glucuronide conjugate which is
`unable to bind iron, cleared through the kidneys with a half
`life of 47-134 minutes, and excreted almost completely in the
`urine in the form of mainly a glucuronide conjugate,
`unchanged LI, and LI bound to iron.9 Variations among
`patients in the clearance and extent of metabolism of LI have
`been noted. Removal of iron by Ll is thought to take place
`mainly from the serum and the liver.' LI does not increase
`faecal iron or absorption from the gut.
`The amount of iron excreted by L 1 depends on the dose and
`frequency ofadministration of the drug and the iron load of the
`patient. Single doses of Ll of 45-62 mg/kg in patients loaded
`with iron resulted in the urinary excretion of 10-70 mg iron
`(compared with less than I mg in normal people).n Results so
`far indicate that doses of 50-100 mg of L l/kg/day seem to
`cause a rate of excretion of iron sufficient to reduce the iron
`load of patients and maintain in most cases serum ferritin
`concentrations of 1000-2000 µg/I. Studies of intensive
`chelation have also been carried out and proved very effective;
`in one case 325 mg of iron was excreted in the urine after the
`oral administration of 16 g of LI in divided doses. ~ Overall,
`the results of iron removal by L l are highly encouraging, and
`there is no reason to suspect that with safe doses this treatment
`will not be as effective as subcutaneous desferrioxamine.
`Major toxic side effects of LI in animals during the
`administration of subacute doses of 200 mg/kg/day for up to
`12 months include a lowering of the white cell count,
`hypocellularity of the bone marrow affecting mainly progeni·
`tors of white cells, enlargement of the adrenals, and hyper(cid:173)
`salivation. 3 Histopathological examination of rats treated with
`acute intragastric doses of LI of greater tfian 2 g/kg have
`
`BMJ VOLUME 303
`
`23 NOVEMBER 1991
`
`1279
`
`
`1 of 2
`
`Taro Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.
`Exhibit 1019
`
`

`

`shown congestion in various organs, suggesting death from
`congestive heart failure . LI and its iron complex are not
`mutagenic and do not increase the growth of yersinia in
`vitro. l
`Toxic side effects observed during multicentre clinical
`trials with L I in over 200 patients known to have mainly
`thalassaemia and other volunteers in the United Kingdom,
`India, Switzerland, Canada, the Netherlands, Italy, and
`Czechoslovakia include transient episodes of agranulocytosis
`in two patients; musculoskeletal and joint pains in 19 patients;
`one fatal incident with a patient who developed a lupus-like
`syndrome; gastric intolerance in 12; and an increased require(cid:173)
`ment for transfusions of red cells in a patient who had not had
`a splenectomy. 3611
`' A more detailed report on the efficacy and
`toxicity of LI and other chelators in humans is given
`elsewhere."
`The prospect of identifying the few people who may be
`susceptible to LI requires further attention. Such screening
`has been suggested for other drugs - for example, screening
`for the production of sulphoxide in patients treated with
`penicillamine. Other measures might include withdrawing
`L I during acute inflammation and infection-both of which
`activate neutrophils and monocytes11-and introducing pro(cid:173)
`tocols of low doses given often. Toxicity long term and not
`efficacy is the major issue that needs to be addressed with L I
`now and possibly other related oral chelators in the near
`future. Formal long term studies of toxicity in animals and
`clinical trials will possibly be required before all patients
`switch from desferrioxamine to L I or some other oral
`chelator. Such studies, however, are expensive and may never
`be supported by pharmaceutical companies because of the
`
`Cam elf ord revisited
`
`Still not the last word
`
`classification of LI and related chelators in the "orphan
`drugs" category.
`The potentially life saving benefits of treatment with LI in
`patients loaded with iron who are not adequately treated with
`desferrioxamine may outweigh the risks of its possible
`toxicity, and its introduction in such patients may now be
`appropriate.
`
`GEORGE J KONTOGHIORGHES
`
`Senior Research Fellow,
`Department of Haematology,
`Royal Free Hospital School of Medicine,
`University of London,
`London NW3 2QG
`
`I WorlJ Health Org:mii;a1ion . ((,mmuni1y comrol of hereditary anaemias. Bull \t'.,,JJ lfrulth Or1:.in
`1983;61:63-80.
`.? Kunzmi n NA . Toxii:ity from alummium and iron: rccogmdon, 1re~nmcn1 and prc\'cllt100. Stnun
`/\'tph,oJ 1986:6(suppl IJ: l · -11.
`3 Kontugh1orgh1:s GJ. Design. propcnies ind cff1.'<'1IW use of 1he oral chdator LI anJ (Uher
`H·kctohydro>:yp)'ndincs in 1hc treatmcnl 0(1ran:i.fus1ooal iron ()\•c:rload in thala~sacm1a. Al'fn N \'
`ik ud SCI 1990:61l:339-SO.
`'* K'mm1i;;.hiorg_hes GJ. A1douri MA , Hnffbran<l AV. Barr J. \'<'onkc B, Kt.1uroudaris T , ,., al.
`Effc.-cuvc ( hc:ladon of iron
`in
`IS
`thalas.saeinia with the oral chela1or J ,2·d1mc1h\'l·3·
`hydroxypynd4-onc. BMJ 1987;l9S: IS09-1 2.

`S Komoghiorgh<S GJ, Barden AN, Hoffbrand A\1 0 Goddard JG, Sheppard L. Barr j, <1 ut. Long
`tcr-m 1rial with the oral iron chdator I ,2·d.imcthyl·3·h)·droxypyrid4-QOC ( ll ). Cl • lroo i:hd:uion
`:and metabolic studies. Br J Hucma10J 1990;76:29S·300.
`6 Tondury P, Kon1oghiorghcs GJ. l.uthy AR. Hil'1 A, Hoffbrand AV, Loucnb:.ch AM ,,., al. 1..1
`(l,2-<lime1hyl·3·hydroxypyr1d·4*0nc) for oraJ iron chda1ion in pa1jcn1s wi1h ~ chaJass.acm1a
`majo<. Br J Hamsatol 1990;16:5Sl).3
`7 Oliv·icri NF, Koren G. Hcnnann C, Bcmur Y, Chung 0, Klein J, tt al. Comparison of oral iron
`chd.ator LI and dC$fcrrioxaminc: in patient$ loaded with iron. Lanett 1990;33':127S·9.
`8 Agarwal MB. Vi.swana11wl C. Ramana1han ), Massi! DE. Shah S, Gupie SS. tt al. Oral iron
`thd:.tlon with L l. Luncd 1990;3)5:60 I.
`9 Kon1og)liorghcs GJ, Goddard JG. Bartlcll AN, Sheppard L. Pbarmaookinttic s1Udies in humans
`wilh 1he ural
`iron chdalor 1,2-dunethyl·3·hydroxypynd-4-+0ne. C/in Plwrmar(I/ Tit.er
`1990:48:2SS-61.
`10 Bardell AN. lfoflbranJ A\'. Kuntoghi0rghes (jj . Long 1cnn 1rial with the Qral iron c;hcl:uor I ~2·
`dimc1hyl·3·h)·droxypyriJ4·Qnt.: tLl). 11 Clinical obscr\'~tions. l:lr J Hatmarol 1990~76:301 ·4.
`1 l Kontoghiorghes, Gj. Ad\-a.ncc.-s 1n ural iron chelatiun 1n man. /nttm.J Harmmol ( in press).
`12 Uc1rc.~h1 JP. Drug mc1:.1001itim b)' leukocyte$ and its rok in Jn,1g induced lupus and other
`id1o:>yncr.at1(' drug reacuons. Tox1colt>JC}' 1990 ~ 20:l 13·3S.
`
`The Cornish town ofCamelford is again in the news. In July
`1988, 20 tonnes of concentrated aluminium sulphate was
`accidentally discharged into a local reservoir. Drinking water
`was heavily polluted for up to three days, not only by the
`primary contaminants but also by copper, zinc, and lead
`di~solved from domestic plumbing. The acute effects on the
`town's inhabitants included gastrointestinal disturbances and
`oral ulceration.
`In response to persistent public concern, in January 1989
`the government appointed an independent group of experts to
`advise on the possible long term consequences of the episode.
`The advisory group, chaired by Dame Barbara Clayton,
`reported in July 1989. 1 While conceding uncertainties, it
`concluded that long term toxic effects were unlikely on the
`basis of current knowledge. It did , however, support the
`collection of further information - for example, on outcomes
`of pregnancy-as well as making recommendations about the
`handling of any similar incidents in future.
`Despite the advisory group's reassuring conclusion public
`anxiety was not allayed. Furthermore, new information
`emerged which suggested that people living in Camelford at
`the time of the accident had persistent symptoms and
`clinicopathological abnormalities. In particular, there were
`reports of raised serum aluminium concentrations several
`months after the incident, of sensitivity to aluminium in some
`people, of a high prevalence of perceived difficulties with
`memory, and of abnormalities on neuropsychological testing.
`The advisory group was therefore reconvened to examine the
`
`fresh evidence, and its second report was published two weeks
`ago. 1
`Like the first, the report is carefully considered and clearly
`reasoned, and it again concludes that long term coxicity is
`unlikely. The limitations of the new data are discussed. For
`example, much of the information derives from self selected
`and highly unrepresentative samples or is inadequately
`controlled. The advisory group accepts that the accident has
`led to real mental and physical suffering but suggests that the
`excess of reported symptoms may be attributable to anxiety
`and heightened awareness rather than a direct toxic effect.
`T here are specific recommendations for further research but
`not for the large scale epidemiological survey that some have
`advocated. This conclusion is unlikely to satisfy those who
`believe that the community has been seriously poisoned.
`The task of the advisory group was always going to be
`difficult. In some ways its situation is similar to that which
`clinicians face when presented with an anxious patient whose
`symptoms seem after routine investigation to signify nothing
`sinister. How far should one go in trying to exclude improb(cid:173)
`able diagnoses before offering reassurance? Prolonged inves(cid:173)
`tigation may throw up spurious abnormalities that increase
`the patient's conviction of major pathology. On the other
`hand, just occasionally there will indeed be serious underlying
`disease.
`Epidemiological investigation of the alleged heal th effects is
`far from straightforward. There is no reliable way of measur(cid:173)
`ing exposure to the contaminated water retrospectively.
`
`1280
`
`BMJ VOLUME 303
`
`23 NOVEMBER 199\
`
`
`2 of 2
`
`Taro Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.
`Exhibit 1019
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket