throbber
j
`
`,YA'bt 1 4 I`drlew Y
`lm . Xas-b • u I . :gJ44T
`IfU;n wt R m,l, IG ..,n,
`
`:-lrNi
`
`1. .,s ,4r' .I
`
`P l, r•
`
`:- :
`
`Peter Lit#,,
`
`tti; iiKclici
`
`May 13, 1996
`
`IJ
`
`l ihi 1 VEKSh1•Y
`. .y
`
`~t~x sg;j11l1r pnt
`
`t
`
`I .I,'lltly ('1 /Ilrt; 4 U
`
`8r: . •.
`
`Dr. G. Sher
`Toronto General Hospital
`EN-3-306
`
`Dear Graham :
`
`RE: MR. CAF
`
`It was a pleasure to see this 24-year-old young man with previous he
`fallu
`back in 1987 with impaired left ventricular function from iron overload. . Since hW'stait on;
`Unfortunately he. did"'rioetolerate
`L1, he has had a dramatic reversal of his situation .
`interferon therapy in 1994, and he is now resuming on L1 .=
`
`From a study point of view, he has graduated from courses of human biology this-
`summer. He is contemplating a graduate program in invitro fertilization in the anatomy
`department . He is able to keep up with the demands of the academic study without any'
`problems .
`
`Currently he is still receiving transfusions at 700 'cc's every three -weeks
`maintaining a hemoglobin over 100. If he uses a lower dose, he would feel quite fatigued :.
`In terms of chelatioil, he is continuing on Ll on the doses of 3-4-4 pills per day . . He does
`have the side effect of bilateral knee effusion that requires occasional taps . He can walk
`adequately, but cannot rwi comfortably . This annears'to be a necessary side effect for him
`to benef from the L1 .
`
`Cardiac function inquiry is essentially negative . He can walk two kilometers on
`the level, and more than 7 flights of stairs .
`
`His current medications included Insulin 15 units q .a.m. and 18 units q.p.m.,
`Penicillin 300 mg . b.i.d., and a medication cased-Rochotrol at 375 mg. b.i.d
`
`1 of 2
`
`Taro Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.
`Exhibit 1066
`
`
`
`

`

`Physical examination revealed a well-looking young man with a resting blood
`pressure of 100/60 mmHg . The NP was at the sternal angle with no inspiratory rise . On
`auscultation the heart sounds were normal with occasional S3 and a Grade IVVI systolic
`ejection murmur in the outflow tract . The liver edge was palpable, but not tender. There
`was a splenectomy scar. The chest was clear and there was no peripheral edema .
`
`C_ has done very well over the past few years, ever since the LI was started .
`His resting ejection fraction in September of 1995 has now increased to 68%, and up to
`71% with exercise . The left ventricle was normal sized with normal contractilty . The
`diastolic function parameters were only very minimally abnormal.
`
`Therefore, CMS has done an amazing turn around with completely :normal
`ventricular function . This can be credited to the chelation effectiveness from the-Ll. _ .
`have asked him to continue with his medication, and allow us to monitor his iron kvets
`well with MR . He should nevertheless keep active. We will be delighted to see him again
`in one year's time .
`
`PL'eb
`
`Peter Liu, M .D.FRCP(C)
`
`2 of 2
`
`Taro Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.
`Exhibit 1066
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket