throbber
DEFERIPRONE (Keifer)
`A report of 22 patients who have taken it for over a decade
`
`M.B. Agarwal, G. Rajadhyaksha, Sameer Munot
`Department of Haematology,
`LTMG Hospital & L1M Medical College, Mumbai - 400 022. India.
`
`Since 1989, 216 transfusion dependent thalassaemia major patients have
`received Deferiprone (Ll, Kelfer) as an iron chelator in Mumbai (India).
`Fifty two of these, had started Deferiprone way back in 1989 when the
`initial phase-II/III trial of L1 began in India. The initial results were
`published in 1992 in British Journal of Haematology. Twenty two .of these
`have continued to take Deferiprone until now except for a brief period in
`1994-95, when the clinical trials were over and the drug was yet not
`licensed for marketing (approximately 16 months). These patients are
`regularly monitored for efficacy and adverse effects, if any, of Deferiprone
`for over a decade. Hence, they form a group of probably, longest, "almost
`continuous" use of Deferiprone in transfusion dependent thalassaemia. The
`dose varied between 75 and 120 mg/kg/day with a mean of 86±12 mg/kg/day.
`The efficacy was excellent with S. ferritin dropping from a mean of 5820 ±
`2660 ng/ml to 2130 ± 1680 ng/ml. Nine of these 22 patients (40%) have had
`their S. ferritin below 2000 ng/ml for last 4 years or more. Eleven of these
`patients have entered the third decade of life. Assessment of cardiac
`function shows normal ejection fraction in all with mild diastolic
`dysfunction in two. One of them has overt diabetes while 2 have altered GIT.
`Seven out of eleven girls have achieved menarche and 3 have regular menses.
`No one has hypothyroidism or hypocalcemia. LFT shows mild alternations in
`liver enzymes in majority of them. Three are HCV-RNA positive and two of
`them have received Interferon+ Ribavarin therapy. Four have complained of
`occasional GI symptoms, one had transient leukopenia while one had skin
`changes suggestive of zinc deficiency. Vague skeleto-muscular pain have
`occurred in six patients while frank arthralgia occurred in three patients.
`None required discontinuation of the therapy. Three of these patients have
`had sequential liver biopsies during last 3 years (2'biopsies i~ 2 patients
`and 3 biopsies in one patient). None of them have shown progressive fibrosis
`I cirrhosis. There have been no toxicities related to visual and auditory
`system. There is no evidence of immune paralysis, opportunistic infections
`or immune complex disorders except variable sero positivity for ANA, RA,
`single standed ds-DNA antibodies and Anti-histone antibody.
`We conclude that very Jong-term use of Deferiprone during second and third
`decade of life in a cohort of patients who tolerated it well, has been a reasonably
`effective therapy without occurrence of known or unknown toxicities. This is
`probably the "Jarg9.st ~nd th~ longest" use of Deferiprone in a given set of patients of
`..
`transfusion dependent' thai~§.._aemia .
`
`
`1 of 2
`
`Taro Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.
`Exhibit 1011
`
`

`

`Millennium ICOC
`*
`
`*·
`
`.
`
`.. :-.. -·
`
`,•
`
`* . -.
`•··
`10th International Conference on Oral Chelators
`in the Treatment of Thalassaemia and Other Diseases
`and Biomed Meeting
`22-26 March 2000 I"· ~~
`. -::.
`.
`' ~· "t ~- . .
`. "'. . . .
`Limassol, ~¥Prus
`.
`..
`
`.
`
`~ . ',· " 2~
`~ "~~
`·~ ~~~
`
`~~
`
`
`2 of 2
`
`Taro Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.
`Exhibit 1011
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket