throbber
Paper 32
`Trials@uspto.gov
`Entered: May 2, 2018
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`TARO PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC.,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`APOTEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case IPR2017-01446
`Patent 7,049,328 B2
`
`
`Before LORA M. GREEN, JEFFREY N. FREDMAN, and
`ZHENYU YANG, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`FREDMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Patent Owner’s Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of
`Barry P. Golob
`
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01446
`Patent 7,049,328 B2
`
`
`Patent Owner, Apotex Technologies Inc. (“Apotex”), filed a Motion
`for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Barry P. Golob pursuant to 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.10(c) in IPR2017-01446 (“Pat. Owner Mot.,” Paper 25), accompanied
`by a Declaration of Barry P. Golob (Ex. 2038). Patent Owner attests that
`Petitioner does not oppose the motion. Paper 25, 2.
`For the reasons provided below, Patent Owner’s Motion is granted.
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), the Board may recognize counsel
`pro hac vice during a proceeding upon a showing of good cause, subject to
`the condition that lead counsel be a registered practitioner. In its notice
`authorizing motions for pro hac vice admission, the Board requires a
`statement of facts showing there is good cause for the Board to recognize
`counsel pro hac vice and an affidavit or declaration of the individual seeking
`to appear in this proceeding.
`In this proceeding, lead counsel for Patent Owner, W. Blake Coblenz,
`is a registered practitioner. Paper 25, 2. Patent Owner’s motion indicates
`that there is good cause for the Board to recognize Mr. Golob pro hac vice
`during these proceedings (Pat. Owner Mot. 3–4), and is supported by the
`declarations of Mr. Golob. Ex. 2038.
`In particular, Mr. Golob declares that he has extensive experience
`litigating patent cases. Ex. 2038 ¶¶ 1, 11. Mr. Golob also declares that he
`has established familiarity with the subject matter at issue in the instant
`proceeding, because as “lead counsel in the U.S. District Court litigation
`before the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
`Marshall Division civil action no. 2:16-cv-00528-RSP concerning U.S.
`Patent No. 7,049,328, I am familiar with subject matter related to cardiac
`iron chelation technology.” Id. ¶ 11. Additionally, Mr. Golob’s declaration
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01446
`Patent 7,049,328 B2
`
`complies with the requirements set forth in the Board’s order authorizing
`motions for pro hac vice admission. Id. ¶¶ 1–12.
`On this record, we determine that Patent Owner has demonstrated that
`Mr. Golob has sufficient legal and technical qualifications to represent
`Patent Owner in the instant proceeding. We further recognize that there is a
`need for Patent Owner to have its counsel in the related district court
`litigation involved in this proceeding. See Patent Owner Mot. 3.
`For the foregoing reasons, Patent Owner has established that there is
`good cause for Mr. Golob’s pro hac vice admission in these proceedings.
`Mr. Golob will be permitted to appear pro hac vice in these proceedings as
`back-up counsel only. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c).
`
`Accordingly, it is:
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s motions for pro hac vice admission of
`Mr. Golob are granted; Mr. Golob is authorized to represent Patent Owner
`only as back-up counsel in the instant proceeding, IPR 2017-01446;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner is to continue to have a
`registered practitioner represent it as lead counsel for the instant proceeding;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Golob is to comply with the Office
`Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as
`set forth in Part 42 of Title 37, Code of Federal Regulations; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Golob is to be subject to the Office’s
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a), and the USPTO Rules
`of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101–901.
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01446
`Patent 7,049,328 B2
`
`PETITIONER:
`Huiya Wu
`Robert V. Cerwinski
`Sara Fink
`GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
`hwu@goodwinlaw.com
`rcerwinski@goodwinlaw.com
`sfink@goodwinlaw.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`W. Blake Coblentz
`Aaron S. Lukas
`COZEN O’CONNOR
`WCoblentz@cozen.com
`ALukas@cozen.com
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket