throbber
IPR2017-01446
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`________________
`
`TARO PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`APOTEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`________________
`
`Case No. IPR2017-01446
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,049,328 B2
`
`Title: USE FOR DEFERIPRONE
`________________
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S MOTION TO SEAL
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01446
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.14 and 42.54, Patent Owner, Apotex
`Technologies, Inc. (“Apotex”), respectfully requests that the Board seal Patent
`Owner’s Opposition to Petitioner’s Motion to Compel Routine Discovery, or in the
`Alternative, for Additional Discovery (“the Opposition”).
`The parties have conferred and agreed to the provisions of the Modified
`Default Standing Protective Order set forth in Exhibit 1051, and have stipulated to
`be bound by its terms. The Modified Default Standing Protective Order provides:
`A party may file documents or information with the Board
`under seal, together with a non-confidential description of
`the nature of the confidential information that is under seal
`and the reasons why the information is confidential and
`should not be made available to the public. The
`submission shall be treated as confidential and remain
`under seal, unless, upon motion of a party and after a
`hearing on the issue, or sua sponte, the Board determines
`that the documents or information do not to qualify for
`confidential treatment.
`(Ex. 1051 (Modified Default Standing Protective Order).)
`The Opposition refers to information contained in Exhibits 1037-1045 and
`1047-1049, which are documents that Patent Owner has designated as Highly
`Confidential pursuant to the Stipulated Protective Order entered in the concurrent
`district court case, ApoPharma Inc. v. Taro Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., Case
`No. 2:16-cv-00528 (E.D. Tex.). Patent Owner therefore filed the Opposition under
`seal, along with a publicly-available redacted version of the Opposition.
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01446
`
`I.
`GOOD CAUSE EXISTS FOR SEALING THE DOCUMENTS
`Although “the default rule is that all papers filed in an inter partes review
`are open and available for access by the public,” a party may file a motion with the
`Board to seal confidential information that is protected from disclosure. See
`Garmin Int’l, Inc. v. Cuozzo Speed Techs., LLC, IPR2012-00001, Paper No. 34
`(PTAB Mar. 14, 2013). “The standard for granting a motion to seal is ‘for good
`cause.’” Id. (quoting 37 C.F.R. § 42.54). The Office Patent Trial Practice Guide,
`77 Fed. Reg. 48756, 48760 (Aug. 14, 2012), states that the “rules identify
`confidential information in a manner consistent with Federal Rule of Civil
`Procedure 26(c)(1)(G), which provides for protective orders for trade secret or
`other confidential research, development, or commercial information.”
`Patent Owner is filing an Opposition to Petitioner’s Motion to Compel
`Routine Discovery, or in the Alternative, for Additional Discovery, which refers to
`materials that Patent Owner has designated as “Highly Confidential” under the
`Stipulated Protective Order filed in the concurrent district court case. Patent
`Owner is seeking to seal the Opposition, and based on Patent Owner’s designation
`in the ongoing district court litigation, there is good cause to seal these documents.
`
`II. CERTIFICATION OF CONFERENCE WITH OPPOSING
`PARTY PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.54
`The parties have conferred and Petitioner does not oppose this motion.
`THEREFORE, Patent Owner respectfully requests that the Board grant this
`Motion to Seal.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01446
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: April 23, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`/W. Blake Coblentz/
`W. Blake Coblentz
`Counsel for Patent Owners
`
`
`
`
`
`COZEN O’CONNOR PC
`1200 Nineteenth St. N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20036
`202-912-4837
` wcoblentz@cozen.com
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01446
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`I hereby certify that, on April 23, 2018, I caused a true and correct copy of
`the foregoing materials: PATENT OWNER’S MOTION TO SEAL to be served
`via electronic mail on the following attorneys of record:
`
`
`Huiya Wu
`Sarah Fink
`GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
`The New York Times Building
`620 Eighth Avenue
`New York, NY 10018-1405
`HWu@goodwin.law.com
`SFink@goodwinlaw.com
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/ W. Blake Coblentz
`
`W. Blake Coblentz
`Reg. No. 57,104
`COZEN O’CONNOR
`1200 Nineteenth Street, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20036
`(202) 912-4837
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket