throbber
Magnetic Resonance Materials in Biology, Physics and Medicine 6 (1998) 7712
`
`
`
`MAGMA
`tic Resonance Materials in
`Physics, Biology and Medicine
`
`
`T2 relaxation time study of iron overload in b-thalassemia
`
`S.I. Mavrogeni a-*, E.D. Gotsis 1’, V. Markussis b, N. Tsekos C, C. Politis d, E. Vretou d,
`D. Kremastinos i‘
`
`" Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, 50 Experuu Street, 175-6] P.Fa/ir0. Athens. Greece
`b Ent'ephalor Institute, Athens, Greece
`C University ofA/Iinnesota.
`iMitmeapoliS. USA
`“ Drakepauiirm Hospital, Athens. Greece
`
`Received 25 September 1997; received in revised form l5 December 1997; accepted 21 January 1998
`
`Abstract
`
`Myocardial iron deposition occurs as a result of blood transfusion therapy in b-thalassemia major patients. Since this deposition
`causes various cardiac complications, it is of interest to assess the iron content of the myocardium in relation to the clinical picture
`of the patients. Two different MR1 indices were used to achieve this purpose: the T2 relaxation time and the heart/skeletal muscle
`signal intensity ratio. ECG gated spin echo images were obtained from 54 adult thalassemic patients, with a mean age of 26
`(18—44) years, at TE = 22 ms and 60 ms, using a 1.5 T system. Patients were divided into 2 groups (A and B), according to their
`serum ferritin lcvcls (> or< 2000 ng ml 1). Results were compared with nine controls, with a mean age of 25 (18e43) years.
`Heart T2 relaxation time in controls (44.3i3.5 ms) was higher than in group A (29.9:57 ms, P<0.001) and group B
`(33.4 i 6.8 ms, P < 0.01). T2 was measurable in 66% of group A and 83% of group B patients. The heart/muscle signal intensity
`ratio in group A (0.45 i 0.27) was lower than in group B (0.82 i 0.33. P < 0.001) and the controls (1.15 i 0.20, P < 0.001). The
`heart/muscle signal intensity ratio was measurable in 94“ 0 of the patients and demonstrated an inverse relationship with the serum
`ferritin levels (r : — 0.52, P < 0.01). This study indicates that the heart/muscle ratio is a sensitive index of iron overload and it
`can be measured in the majority of patients, irrespective of tissue iron concentration, thereby offering an advantage over the use
`of T2 relaxation time. © 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
`
`Keywords: b-Thalassemia; Heart; T2 relaxation time
`
`1. Introduction
`
`b-Thalassemia major is a genetic hemoglobinopathy
`which is especially prevalent
`in Mediterranean coun-
`tries. It is characterised by various degrees of ineffective
`hemopoiesis and intramedullary hemolysis. Current
`therapy includes regular blood transfusions with simul-
`taneous iron Chelatjon therapy, mainly employing des-
`ferrioxamine,
`in
`order
`to
`avoid
`secondary
`hemosiderosis. Bone marrow transplantation Offers an
`effective alternative to constant blood transfusions,
`
`
`,_,_
`* Corresponding author. Tel: + 30
`9882797; e-mail: som@aias.net.gr
`
`1 9882797;
`
`fax: + 30 l
`
`to be
`where the circumstances are appropriate for it
`performed. Gene therapy offers a bright outlook to the
`future treatment and annulment of the disease and its
`complications. Despite the benefits 0f iron-chelation
`therapy, iron deposition occurs in various organs, as a
`result of inadvertent iron overloading from the trans—
`fused blOOd- Iron deposition in the heart and other
`organs is the causative factor of the main complications
`in b-thalassemia major [l~5]. Excessive iron is primar-
`ily retained in the reticuloendothelial system and, when
`the capacity Of this system is exceeded, secondary depo-
`sition in parenchymal organs follows [6].
`The estimation of iron stores in each individual or-
`.
`.
`.
`.
`gan and the total 1ron burden in b-thalassemic patlents
`
`1352—8661/98/$ — see front matter © 1998 Elsevier Science B.Vi All rights reserved.
`PIISl352-8661(98)00003-9
`
`Apotex Tech.
`Ex. 2033
`
`Apotex Tech.
`Ex. 2033
`
`

`

`8
`
`SJ. Mavrogeni el al. / Magnetic Resonance Materials in Biology, Physicr and Medicine 6 (1998) 7712
`
`is useful in evaluating the efficacy of chelation therapy.
`This is a difficult task since hemosiderin and ferritin,
`the iron storage proteins, are mainly intracellular. On
`the other hand, serum ferritin levels are highly corre-
`lated with the amount of iron deposited in the tissues,
`and are hence considered a very sensitive index [7].
`However, the levels may be affected by factors such as
`fever,
`inflammation, etc.
`[8,9]. At present.
`the most
`accurate way to estimate the total body iron deposition
`is the direct measurement of iron content in liver biopsy
`specimens [10], an invasive procedure which cannot be
`applied during routine follow—up, and which does not
`offer any information concerning iron deposition in the
`heart.
`
`The ability of stored intracellular tissue iron to en-
`hance magnetic susceptibility provides the basis by
`which it can be detected by magnetic resonance imaging
`(MRI). Recent studies in experimental animals have
`shown that the T2 relaxation time is linearly correlated
`with the total iron content for all organs, including the
`heart [1 1]. However, T2 relaxation time calculation may
`prove to be impossible in severely iron-overloaded pa—
`tients, due to a very low signal intensity which is similar
`to background noise [12].
`The aim of this study was to assess heart, liver and
`skeletal muscle iron content
`in b-thalassemia major
`patients using two different indices (T2 relaxation time
`of the heart, liver and skeletal muscles, and the heart/
`muscle and liver/muscle MRI signal intensity (SI) ra-
`tios), and to correlate these parameters with the
`corresponding serum ferritin levels.
`
`2. Patients and methods
`
`2.]. Patient population (Table I).
`
`Fifty four thalassemic patients, 24 males and 30
`females, with a mean age of 26 (18744) years, were
`studied. Thirty nine of them had no symptoms of heart
`failure (NYHA 1) whereas 15 were diagnosed with
`
`Table 1
`
`Study group stratification (values as x i SD or range)
`
`
`
`
`
`Group BGroup A Group C
`
`Subjects (n)
`Age (yrs)
`Ferritin (ng ml")
`Blood units transfused
`(n)
`
`13.3 i 4.4 12.7 i 5Chelation (years) 7
`
`30
`26 (18-—36)
`4102 i 1541
`1025 i 274
`
`9
`24
`25 (18743)
`26 (18744)
`11504—381“ u
`965 i 429
`7
`
`
`
`
`
`Group A: high ferritin population.
`Group B: low ferritin population.
`Group C: controls.
`“ P< 0.01.
`
`heart failure (NYHA 11—111). All patients were iron-
`chelated regularly and 40 of them were splenectomized.
`A serum ferritin level below 2000 ng ml’l was consid-
`ered to be the target value for a patient successfully
`treated with deferoxamine [27]. Patients were stratified
`into two groups, according to their average serum
`ferritin values ( > or < 2000 ng ml “ I) over the previous
`5 years: Group A (n = 30) with mean ferritin levels of
`4150 i 1653 ng ml“ and group B (n = 24) with mean
`ferritin levels of 1240 i 366 ng ml’ 1. The total number
`of transfusions and years of iron-chelation therapy were
`similar in both groups. The results from thalassemic
`patients were compared with those of nine normal
`volunteers (Group C; controls) with a mean age of 25
`(18443) years. An informed consent was obtained from
`all participants.
`
`2.2. MRI techniques
`
`studies were conducted using a 1.5 T
`All MRI
`Siemens system (Magnetom, SP), with an ECG gated
`spin echo sequence (acquisition matrix=256 x 256,
`FOV = 40 x 40 cm2, number of slices, eight, TR equal
`to RR interval, and TE = 22 and 60 ms). The oblique
`orientation of the imaging slices was determined from
`scout coronal anatomical images (parameters as above
`with TE 2 22 ms), in order to depict a short axis view
`of the heart. These images included the liver and a
`section of skeletal muscle (latissimus dorsi). The signal
`intensities of the heart (81”),
`the liver (SIL) and the
`skeletal muscle (SIM) were determined using circular
`regions of interest (ROIs). Two indices were employed:
`(a) The T2 relaxation time of the heart (T2“),
`liver
`(T2“) and skeletal muscle (TZM), calculated from the
`images collected at
`the two TE values [13];
`(b) The
`heart/muscle (SIB/SIM) and liver/muscle (SIL/SIM) sig-
`nal intensity ratios at TE = 22 ms. The skeletal muscle
`was used as an internal standard to form this ratio since
`iron deposition is minimal in skeletal muscle [12].
`
`2.3. Statistical analysis
`
`The results are expressed as x: SD and were com-
`pared by means of the unpaired two—tailed Student 1
`test. The Chi square test was used to compare percent-
`ages between groups. Correlations between various
`parameters were sought by employing Pearson’s corre-
`lation coefficient. Statistical significance was considered
`for P < 0.05.
`
`3. Results
`
`The T2 relaxation time of the left ventricle of the
`heart (TZH) in the high ferritin group (group A) was
`29.9 i 5.7 ms. In the low ferritin group (group B), the
`Apotex Tech.
`Ex. 2033
`
`Apotex Tech.
`Ex. 2033
`
`

`

`SJ. Mavrogem' er a1. /Magnetic Resonance Materials in Biology, Physics and Medicine 6 (I998) 7~12
`
`9
`
`Table 2
`T2 relaxation time in the study groups (values expressed as x i SD)
`
`Group A
`
`Group B
`
`Group C
`
`Subjects (n)
`T2 heart (ms)
`r2 liver (ms)
`
`30
`299 i 5.7 (20)
`24.3 t 1.8 (3)
`
`T2 muscle
`(ms)
`
`28.4 i 2.7 (30)
`
`24
`33.4 J_r6.8 (20)
`29.0 i 10.3
`(12)
`29.2 i 2.4 (24)
`
`9
`44.3 i 3.5 (9)"b
`30.0 i 7.7 (9)
`
`30.0 i 0.9 (9)
`
`The numbers in the brackets denote the number of subjects in whom
`the T2 relaxation time was measurable.
`Group A: high ferritin population.
`Group B: low ferritin population.
`Group C: controls.
`“ P<0.001, compared to group A.
`b P<0.()l. compared to group B.
`
`T2 relaxation time was 33.45 + 6.8 ms and in the
`
`the time was 44.3 i3.5 ms. The
`controls (group C),
`T2H in group C was higher compared both to group A
`(P<0.001) and group B (P<0.01). There was no
`statistically significant difference between groups A and
`B (Table 2).
`intensity of the myocardium (SIH) was
`The signal
`only measurable at both echo times in 20/30 (66.7%) of
`the group A patients and in 20/24 (83.3%) of the group
`B patients (PzNS) (Fig. 1(a, b)Fig. 2(a, b)). As a result
`the T2H could only be calculated in these patients.
`Seven additional group A patients and the remaining
`four group B patients had measurable signal intensities
`at TE=22 ms but not at TE=60 ms. The signal to
`noise ratio was too low at both echo times to permit T2
`and signal
`intensity ratio calculation in the final
`re—
`maining three group A patients. Twelve group A pa-
`tients
`(40%) and three group B patients
`(12.5%)
`manifested heart failure (NYHA 117111). Out of these
`patients, T2H was measurable only in four out of 12 of
`the group A population and in one out of three patients
`belonging to group B.
`There was no difference in the T2 relaxation time of
`
`the liver (T2L) between groups A, B and C. The signal
`intensities of the liver (SIL) at both echo times and,
`consequently, the calculated T2L, were only measurable
`in three out of 30 (10%) group A patients and 12 out of
`24 (50%) group B patients (P<0.01, chi square test).
`Twelve additional patients of group A and nine group
`B subjects had measurable signal intensities of the liver
`at TE = 22 ms, but not at TE 2 60 ms.
`The T2 relaxation time of the skeletal muscle (T2M)
`was measurable in all subjects and was similar in the
`three groups.
`In group A, no correlation was docu—
`mented between T2“, T2L or TZM and ferritin levels,
`nor between the number of transfusions or iron-chela—
`
`tion time. In group B, an inverse correlation was found
`between the average ferritin levels and T2H (r =2 — 0.49,
`P < 0.05).
`
`The heart/muscle signal intensity ratio (SIH/SIM) in
`group A (0.45 i 0.27) was lower
`than in group B
`(0.82 i 0.33, P < 0.001) and group C (1.15 i 0.2, P <
`0.001) (Table 3). Similarly, the liver/muscle signal inten-
`sity ratio (SIL/SIM) in group A (0.17 i 0.13) was lower
`than in group B (0.37i0.3l, P<0.01) and group C
`(1.28 -l_~ 0.16, P < 0.01). Patients with heart failure, as a
`subgroup, had a lower SIH/SIM ratio (0.33 :1; 0.19) com—
`pared to the mean group A (P<0.001) and group B
`(P < 0.001) values. Ferritin levels were inversely corre-
`lated with both SIH/SIM (r = ~—0.52, P<0.01) (Fig. 3)
`and SIL/SIM ratios (r = —— 0.41, P < 0.01). In group B, a
`positive correlation (r= 0.55, P<0.01) was found be-
`tween the SIB/SIM ratio and T2H values.
`
`
`Mwmwfi“ . “a ,.
`
`t: 5r
`
`l. (a and b) Short axis view of the heart ofa thalassemic patient
`Fig.
`with mild iron overload, using TE = 22 ms (3) and TE = 60 ms (b).
`Apotex Tech.
`Ex. 2033
`
`Apotex Tech.
`Ex. 2033
`
`

`

`10
`
`5.1. Mavrogeni el 01. /Magnetic Resonance Materials in Biology, Physics and Medicine 6 (1998) 7712
`
`
`
`Fig. 2. (a and b) Short axis view of the heart of a thalassemic patient
`with severe iron overload and impaired LV function, using TE = 22
`ms (a) and TE 2 60 ms (b). In the latter image, the myocardial signal
`intensity is equal to the background noise.
`
`4. Discussion
`
`The presence of iron affects the tissue T1 and T2
`relaxation times [14,15]. However,
`the effect on T1
`relaxation time is not as significant
`[15], and most
`studies use the T2 time for characterization of iron
`
`deposition. This effect is proportional to the concentra-
`tion of iron in the tissue and depends on the applied
`magnetic field (B0) [16]. This concept was employed to
`evaluate a group of adult thalassemic patients.
`In this study, the heart and liver T2 relaxation times
`were significantly reduced, with higher iron concentra—
`tions resulting in lower T2 values. The signal intensities
`(SI) of different tissues demonstrated similar trends. No
`
`significant difference was found in the heart T2 relax-
`ation time between the high and low serum ferritin
`groups. Serum ferritin levels were only inversely corre-
`lated to heart T2 relaxation times (T2H)
`in the low
`ferritin group. These observations result from the fact
`that the T2 of several patients in the high ferritin group
`could not be measured due to low signal to noise ratio.
`On the contrary, signal
`intensity measurements were
`feasible in all patients,
`irrespective of iron burden.
`Significant differences were recorded between the two
`patient groups, and an inverse correlation was found
`between heart/muscle and liver/muscle SI
`ratio and
`serum ferritin levels
`in the thalassemic population.
`Since there is a significant error involved in the calcula-
`tion of the T2 relaxation time when the tissue signal
`intensity (SI) is low, heart SI (normalized in proportion
`to skeletal muscle employed as the control standard) is
`a more appropriate index for correlation with iron
`deposits.
`serious complication of b-tha-
`a
`failure,
`Heart
`lassemia, was present in both ferritin groups, although
`it was more prevalent in the severely iron—overloaded
`group. When heart failure patients from groups A and
`B were analysed as a separate sub-group, the T2 relax-
`ation time of the heart was measurable only in one
`third of the population, and the heart/muscle signal
`intensity ratio was even lower than the values observed
`in the high ferritin group. Similarly, the T2 relaxation
`time of the liver was measurable in half of the patients
`in the low ferritin group, whereas in the majority of the
`patients
`in the high ferritin group, measurements
`proved to be impossible. When the liver/muscle signal
`intensity ratio was employed, however, measurements
`in all patients were achieved and differences were man—
`ifested between the high and low ferritin groups, and
`the control subjects.
`
`Table 3
`
`Signal intensity ratios (SI) in the study groups (values expressed as
`x i SD)
`
`
`
` Group B Group C Group A
`
`Subjects (n)
`SIM/SIM
`
`SIL/SIM
`
`
`24
`30
`0.45 i 0.27 (27) 0.82 i 0.33
`(24)a
`0.17i0,13 (15) 0.37i0.3l
`(21)“
`
`9
`1.15 i 0.20 (9)b
`
`1.28i0.l6 (9)”
`
`
`intensities measured at TE=22 ms (H: heart, M: skeletal
`Signal
`muscle, L: liver). The numbers in the brackets denote the number of
`subjects in whom the signal intensity ratios were measurable.
`Group A: high ferritin population.
`Group B: low ferritin population.
`Group C: controls.
`“ P < 0.001.
`
`hP<0.01, compared to group A.
`C P<0.0()l, compared to groups A and B.
`
`Apotex Tech.
`Ex. 2033
`
`Apotex Tech.
`Ex. 2033
`
`

`

`SJ. Mavrogeni er al. / Magnetic Resonance Materials in Biology, Physics and Medicine 6 (1998) 77712
`
`11
`
`1.60 '7
`
`1.40 e»
`
`1.20 +
`
`1.00 +
`
`0.80 ~—
`
`
`
`heart/muscleSIratio
`
`0.60 ~
`
`0.40 T
`
`0.20 r
`
`.
`
`‘
`
`‘o
`
`0
`
`o
`
`o
`
`.
`
`9.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`o
`
` l l l i» l 0.00
`
`
`
`I
`h
`i
`l
`
`0
`1000
`2000
`3000
`4000
`5000
`6000
`7000
`8000
`9000
`10000
`
`Ferrltln (nglml)
`
`Inverse relationship between the heart/muscle signal
`Fig. 3.
`(r r v (3:5)}; F<933Hr
`
`intensity (SI) ratios and the average ferritin levels of the thalassemic patients
`
`Serum ferritin is currrently considered the most accu—
`rate index of body iron content. Variations in serum
`ferritin mainly correspond to changes in the reticuloen-
`dothelial system storage iron levels and not to changes
`in the parenchymal
`iron content
`[17]. Liver disease,
`inflammation.
`infection and assay mmlicafiems
`[8,9,18] have been reported to influence measurements.
`In this study, in an attempt to overcome these limita-
`tions,
`the average ferritin levels of the preceding five
`years were employed.
`
`There is a controversy over the precise relationship
`between the quantity of iron present in the myocardium
`and the degree of heart dysfunction. Correlations be—
`tween heart T2 relaxation time and cardiac biopsy are
`absent since right ventricular biopsies are subject
`to
`serious sampling errors and iron deposition is patchy
`(not uniform) [)9]. A good contention was found be-
`tween iron content and T2 relaxation time only when
`whole rat hearts were sampled [11]. Under these cir—
`cumstances, MRI appears to be useful
`in addressing
`this issue,
`
`Recently, studies of thalassemic patients at 0.5 T
`intliicateb that cardiac comphhcabons are rehateb to )0»!
`T2 times [20]. The heart/muscle signal
`intensity ratio
`was also found to be sensitive to iron content
`in a
`
`group of patients treated by mmtiple mood transfusions
`[12]: and‘a t‘rend‘tbr worse tieart tunctron was ev1dent
`in the more heavily-transfused patients, even though
`there was no correbatbon with serum 331x215]: Dave-)5.
`)2?
`
`[21], employing a new in vivo,
`addition, Zaino et al.
`non-invasive method for measuring iron utilizing nu-
`clear resonance scattering (NRS), detected symptomatic
`cardiac disease in the patients with the more elevated
`cardiac iron levels.
`
`Liver iron load, as studied by MRI, has been consid-
`ered as an alternative to liver biopsy for the assessment
`
`of total iron burden [22]. In vitro measurements of T2
`relaxation time of liver samples, from iron-overloaded
`rats [l4] and spleen samples from thalassemic patients
`[15], demonstrated a linear correlation between relax-
`ation rate (1/T2) and iron content. The reticuloendothe-
`‘nal system preferentially accumulates iron from the
`breakdown of transfused red blood cells before iron
`
`deposition occurs in other parenchymal organs such as
`the heart. The data presented here are consistent with
`the study by Buja et al.
`[23], which indicates that
`cardiac iron deposition is accompanied by excessive
`hepatic iron deposits.
`Although the T2 relaxation time is generally a reli-
`able index of iron deposition, being well-correlated with
`liver biopsy information,
`it may be unmeasurable in
`severely iron—overloaded patients, due to low signal
`intensity equal to background noise. For this reason,
`some authors consider the application of the T2 relax-
`ation time to assess heart
`iron deposition as being
`inaccurate [12], The use of a 0.5 T machine, where the
`magnetic susceptibility phenomenon is less prominent
`[16],
`the use of shorter echo times (TE) [15] or the
`application of MR spectroscopy [22],, could be more
`promising in the study of severe iron-overloaded pa—
`tients. Other non-invasive techniques such as dual en-
`ergy computed tomography [24,251,
`superconducted
`quantum. interference ram: (\SQULDL agaplirzatirmi [310‘
`and nuclear resonance scattering (NRS) can overcome
`this limitation, but are not available on a wide scale.
`This study suggests that M'Rl' could prove to be an
`effective non—invasive method in performing tissue
`characterization. MRI,
`in particular, provides
`the
`means for the simultaneous examination of heart iron
`deposition and heart
`function. Moreover, measure—
`ments are quantifiable, enabling the repeated examina-
`tions of thalassemic patients and evaluation of the
`iron-che'la‘tion therapy efficacy.
`Apotex Tech
`Ex. 2033
`
`Apotex Tech.
`Ex. 2033
`
`

`

`12
`
`SJ. Mavrogeni et al. / Magnetic Resonance Materials in Biology, Physics and Medicine 6 (1998) 7712
`
`In conclusion, T2 relaxation time is a very useful
`index in the monitoring of tissue iron deposition. How-
`ever,
`it
`is not always measurable using commercially
`available systems. As a consequence, the use of signal
`intensity ratio appears to be a valuable alternative for
`patient screening and follow-up.
`
`Acknowledgements
`
`We are indebted to Sonja Phillips, BSc. MSc., for
`proofing the manuscript.
`
`References
`
`[1] Kattamis C, Touliatos N, Haidas S, Matsaniotis N. Growth of
`children with thalassemia: effect of different
`transfusion regi-
`mens. Arch Dis Childhood 1970;45:502—6.
`[2] Propper RD, Cooper B, Rufo RR, et a]. Continuous subcuta-
`neous administration of deferoxamine in patients with iron over—
`load. N Engl J Med 1977;297:418723.
`lron state and
`[3] Aldouri MA, Wonke B, Hoffbrand AV, et a1.
`hepatic disease in patients with thalassemia major treated with
`long—term subcutaneous
`desferrioxamine.
`J Clin
`Pathol
`1987;40:135379.
`[4] Engle MA. Cardiac involvement in Cooley's anemia. Ann NY
`Acad Sci 1969;] 1926947702.
`[5] Kremastinos DT, Tsiapras D, Tsetsos G, Rentoukas E. Vretou
`H, Toutouzas P. Left ventricular diastolic Doppler characteris-
`tics in bthalassemia major. Circulation 1993;88:1127 V35.
`[6] Jacobs A. The pathology of iron overload. 1n: Jacobs A, Wor—
`wood M, editors. Iron in biochemistry and medicine, 11. New
`York: Academic Press, 19802439752.
`[7] Jacobs A, Miller F, Worwood M, Beamisch R, Wardrop C.
`Ferritin in the serum of normal subjects with iron def~ciency
`and iron overload. Br Med J 1972;XX:206721].
`[8] Crosby WH. Serum ferritin fails to indicate hemochromatosis:
`nothing gold can stay. N Engl J Med 1976;294:33374.
`[9] Green R, Watson LR, Saab GA, Crosby WH. ‘Normal’ serum
`ferritin: a caution. Blood 1977;50:54577.
`[10] Ridson RA, Barry M, Flynn DN. Transfusiona] iron overload:
`the relationship between tissue iron concentration and hepatic
`fibrosis in thalassemia. J Pathol 1975;] 16:83795.
`[11] Liu P, Henkelman M, Joshi J, Waien S, Butany J, Olivieri N.
`Quantification of myocardial
`tissue iron contents using NMR
`relaxation. Validation in a novel murine thalassemia model.
`JACC 1992;19(3):187A (abstract 935—976).
`
`[12] Johnston DL, Rice L, Vick W, Hedrick TD, Rokey R. Assess-
`ment of tissue iron overload by nuclear magnetic resonance
`imaging. Am J Med 1989;87:4077.
`[l3] Sechtem U, Higgins C. Relaxation measurements and contrast
`media.
`In: Underwood R, Firmin D, editors. Magnetic Reso~
`nance of
`the
`cardiovascular
`system. London: Blackwell,
`199128977101.
`
`[14] Stark DD, Moseley ME, Bacon BR, et a]. Magnetic resonance
`imaging and spectroscopy of hepatic iron overload. Radiology
`1985;154:137742.
`[15] Gomori JM, Grossman R]. Drott HR. MR relaxation times and
`iron content of thalassemic spleens: an in vitro study. AJR
`1988;150:567—79.
`[16] Vymazal J, Brooks RA, Zak O, McRill C, Shen C, Di Chiro G.
`T] and T2 of ferritin at different field strengths: Effect on MRI.
`Magn Res Med 1992;27:368774.
`[17] Gomori JM, Horev G, Tamary H, et a1. Hepatic iron overload:
`Quantitative MR imaging. Radiology 1991;179:36779.
`[18] Worwood M, Cragg SJ, Jacobs A, McLaren C, Ricketts C,
`Economidou J. Binding of serum ferritin to concanavallin A:
`Patients with homozygous betaithalassemia and transfusional
`iron overload. Br J Haematol 19801462409716.
`[l9] Olson LJ, Edwards WD, McCall JT, Ilstrup DM, Gersh BJ.
`Cardiac iron deposition in idiopathic hemochromatosis: histo»
`logic and analytic assessment of 14 hearts from autopsy. JACC
`1987;10:1239743.
`[20] Liu P, Olivieri N, Sul1ivan H, Henkelman M. Magnetic reso—
`nance imaging of cardiac iron overload in thalassemia: Detection
`of iron content and association with cardiac complications.
`JACC 1993:21(2):409A (abstract 9487119).
`[21] Zaino EC, Wielopolski L.
`in vivo measurement of hepatic and
`cardiac iron in Cooleys anemia by nuclear resonance scattering.
`Ann NYAcad Sci 1990;612:57376.
`[22] Dixon RM. Styles P. Al-Refaie F, et a1. Assessment of hepatic
`iron overload in thalassemic patients by magnetic resonance
`spectroscopy. Hepatology 1994;19:904—710.
`[23] Buja LM, Roberts WC. Iron in the heart: Etiology and clinical
`significance. Am J Med 1971;51:209721.
`[24] Houang MT, Skalicka A, Arozena X. Huehns ER, Shaw DG.
`Correlation between computed tomographic values and liver
`iron content in thalassemia major with iron overload. Lancet
`1979;]:1322733.
`[25] Olivieri NF, Grisaru D. Daneman A, Martin DJ, Rose V,
`Freedman MH. Computed tomography scanning of the liver to
`determine eff~cacy of iron chelation therapy in thalassemia
`major. J Pediatrics 1989;114:427—30.
`[26] Brittenham G, Griffith PM, Nienhuis AW, et al. Efficacy of
`deferoxamine in preventing complications of iron overload in
`patients with thalassemia major. N Engl J Med 1994;331:5677?
`73.
`
`[27] Olivieri NF, Nathan DG, MacMillan JH, Wayne AS, Liu PP,
`McGee A. et a]. Survival
`in medically treated patients with
`homozygous b—thalassemia. N Engl J Med 1994;331:574—8.
`
`Apotex Tech.
`Ex. 2033
`
`Apotex Tech.
`Ex. 2033
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket