throbber
Reliance on one methodology without verification via other
`important sources of data, such as the Somali Red Crescent death
`cart, greatly reduced the usefulness of Moore and colleagues’ visit.
`Preliminary analysis of data taken at the Concern Worldwide adult
`therapeutic centre in Baidoa underlines the poor state of knowledge
`about adult malnutrition. The average body mass index of the first
`650 severely malnourished adults and adolescents was 13. This is
`substantially lower than 16, recently proposed as the level to mark
`the most severe grade of adult starvation.3 Others survived with a
`body mass index below 10 on admission. Famine oedema occurred
`in 30% of admissions and was associated with a poorer prognosis.
`
`Concern Worldwide,
`248-250 Lavender Hill,
`London SW11 1LJ, UK
`
`STEVE COLLINS
`
`1. Mercer A. Medecins Sans Frontieres (Holland), Health surveillance review, Baidoa.
`Somalia, 1993.
`2. Collins S. Concern Worldwide Survey of nutrition and food distribution in North
`West Baidoa district February 1993.
`3. Ferro-Luzzi A, et al. A simplified approach to assessing adult chronic energy
`deficiency. Eur J Clin Nutr 1992; 46: 173-86.
`
`SIR,-Your April 23 editorial "Do epidemiologists cause
`epidemics?" brought to mind a similar speculation: "Do
`nutritionists cause mass starvation?" Your April 9 issue carries a
`paper by Dr Moore and colleagues on microdemographic research
`in Somalia undertaken by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC).
`This study detailed high mortality among two populations of
`displaced people, with death rates of 4-7 and 16-8 per 10 000 per
`day, respectively, over a period of 8 months. These rates are high,
`but well within the recorded range for famine relief shelters,
`particularly in view of the fact that the displaced people in Baidoa,
`who suffered the higher rate, were the remnant of a larger
`population subject to much out-migration. As in all recorded
`famines, the overwhelming causes of death were preventable
`infectious diseases such as measles and diarrhoea.
`However, when these results were first announced in December,
`1992/ the media claimed the rate to be the highest ever recorded and
`attributed the deaths exclusively to starvation. This was because, in
`addition to the 8 month death rate, CDC included death rates in the
`month before, when, in Baidoa, 5 children out of 21 had
`died-equivalent to 69 4 per 10 000 per day. These five unfortunate
`children received a wholly unwarranted international notoriety:
`"Somalia has amongst the highest death rate from starvation ever
`recorded... deaths among children under five in one village reached
`69-4 per day for every 10 000 children-more than three times that
`of the 1984-85 Ethiopian famine".2 This claim is absurd, but,
`coming on the day after US Marines stormed ashore in Somalia
`with the stated aim of saving two million Somalis from death by
`starvation, it helped justify that unprecedented action, and also the
`continuing preoccupation with delivering food among most of the
`intematinal agencies active in the country.
`By December, 1992, the price of staple grain in Somalia’s markets
`had fallen below the cost of production, and farmers were beginning
`to complain that the imported food aid was making it impossible for
`them to sell their harvests. Two million Somalis did not face death
`by starvation; the food scarcity was almost over. Nonetheless, relief
`agencies continued to open feeding centres and distribution points:
`the World Food Programme opened 35 distribution points in
`Mogadishu in February alone. Meanwhile, contrary to the
`warnings of Somali health professionals, the public health
`requirements of the country have remained largely neglected.
`Measles, malaria, tuberculosis, dysentery, and acute respiratory
`infections are still killing large numbers of Somali children. As a
`result, we concluded in our recent evaluation of Operation Restore
`Hope3 that the international intervention had done little to save lives
`in Somalia.
`
`African Rights,
`11 Marshalsea Road,
`London SE1 1EP, UK
`
`ALEX DE WAAL
`RAKIYA OMAAR
`
`1. Population-based mortality assessment—Baidoa and Afgoi, Somalia, 1992. MMWR
`1992; 41: 913-17.
`2. The Guardian London, UK. Dec 11, 1992.
`3. Operation Restore Hope: a preliminary assessment. London: African Rights, 1993.
`
`1479
`
`Informed consent
`
`SIR,—Your news item on informed consent (May 1, p 1141) can
`be read as giving currency to the notion that there are grades of
`consent--consent and informed consent. There are not.
`The Royal College of Physicians explains in its guidelines:1
`"Potential research subjects are entitled to choose whether or not
`they will participate in research, and obtaining valid (informed,
`understanding, voluntary) consent is central to the ethical conduct
`of clinical investigation. The terms ’valid’, ’informed’ and
`’voluntary’ imply that subjects have enough information, in a form
`that is comprehensible, to enable them to make an autonomous,
`deliberated (proper) judgement whether or not to participate. The
`word ’consent’ encompasses these requirements, for if they are not
`met there is no consent. The use of qualifying adjectives is
`unnecessary and may even be confusing. Therefore the word
`’consent’ will be used without qualification in this document".
`However, the term informed consent is now standard usage and it
`is a continuing reminder that participants in research trials must be
`given adequate information. But there is no such thing as
`uninformed consent. Consent is consent is consent, as the late
`Gertrude Stein might have said.
`37 Denning Road,
`London NW3 1ST, UK
`
`D. R. LAURENCE
`
`1. Royal College of Physicians. Guidelines on the practice of ethics committees in medical
`research involving human subjects. London: RCP, 1990.
`
`Future of oral iron chelator deferiprone (L1)
`SIR,—The decision by Ciba-Geigy to stop development of the
`oral iron chelator L 1 (deferiprone) has already prompted a response
`from the International Study Group on Oral Iron Chelators (April
`24, p 1088). After the 4th International Conference on Oral
`Chelators (ICOC) in Cyprus on March 26-29, at which the
`controversy was aired, the following recommendations were made
`by the ICOC committee.
`Some patients receive no chelation therapy, because of non-
`compliance with desferrioxamine or cost. Over 90% of the world’s
`patients with thalassaemia cannot afford desferrioxamine. The
`options seem to be that these patients receive no treatment or that,
`where clinical trials are feasible with Ll, these should be set up and
`patients recruited, with the permission of the local health authorities
`or, in view of the vast amount of information on this drug,l,2
`attempts should be made to assist organisations or companies to
`register and use this drug under surveillance. Regularly transfused
`patients are at risk, in the absence of chelation therapy of irreversible
`organ damage due to iron overload. Marketing of Ll under
`controlled clinical use should be considered once preclinical and
`clinical data satisfy the local health authorities, and this should also
`apply where desferrioxamine is freely available but cannot be used
`because of toxicity or non-compliance.
`Collected data on all aspects of Ll, including chemistry,
`toxicology, and pharmacology, should be made available, and
`information on adverse effects of L and other iron chelators should
`be sent to the WHO Collaborating Centre for International Drug
`Monitoring, Uppsala, Sweden.
`The ICOC committee took this view in the light of preclinical
`studies and clinical investigations in over 450 patients who have
`taken Ll in fifteen countries. Some patients have taken L1 daily for
`over 4 years, over 100 having taken it daily for more than 3 yeras.3
`All the centres have reported that compliance with Ll is high, iron
`excretion is comparable with that caused by desferrioxamine, while
`liver iron and serum ferritin is being reduced substantially in most
`cases after 6 months to a year. Side-effects during the trials have
`usually been transient. They include 5 cases of transient
`agranulocytosis, transient musculoskeletal/joint pains in about
`20%, gastric intolerance in 6%, and zinc deficiency in 2%. Most
`toxic effects were associated with daily doses of 100 mg/kg but were
`substantially reduced by lowering the dose to 75 mg/kg. Although a
`few patients have had to stop taking Ll because of side-effects no
`clinical trial has been suspended because of toxicity or lack of
`efficacy. The therapeutic margin, in animal models and in patients,
`does not seem to be different for Ll and desferrioxamine.
`
`Apotex Tech.
`Ex. 2021
`
`

`

`1480
`
`Controlled clinical use of L1 should continue and WHO, the
`Thalassaemia International Federation, and other interested parties
`should be encouraged to get involved with the development of Ll
`until a parent for this orphan drug is found. It may prove possible to
`control the toxicity of L in future by identifying the mechanisms of
`the adverse effects and the patients who may be susceptible to such
`toxicity.
`
`Department of Haematology,
`Royal Free Hospital School
`of Medicine,
`London NW3 2QG, UK
`
`GEORGE J. KONTOGHIORGHES
`M. B. AGARWAL PETRIGN TONDURY
`MICHAEL JAEGER
`M. J. KERSTEN
`G. VREUGDENHIL A. VANIA
`Y. E. RAHMAN, for the ICOC committee
`
`1. Oral chelation in the treatment of thalassaemia and other diseases. Drugs Today 1992;
`28 (suppl A): 1-187.
`2. Kontoghiorghes GJ. Advances in oral iron chelation in man. Int J Haematol 1992; 55:
`27-38.
`3. Abstracts of 4th International Conference on Oral Chelators for the Treatment of
`Thalassaemia and Other Diseases. March, 26-29, 1993, Limassol, Cyprus.
`
`SIR,—The International Study Group on Oral Iron Chelators
`disagrees with Ciba-Geigy’s decision to stop. They question the
`relevance of toxicity studies in normal (non-iron-loaded) animals to
`the situation in iron-overloaded patients. This argument seems
`logical at first glance but proves incorrect once the safety of Ll is
`compared with that of desferrioxamine. Pharmacological and
`toxicological studies in rats show that there is no safety margin for
`Ll, while desferrioxamine displays an acceptable safety margin:
`Subcutaneous
`desferrioxamine
`(mg/kg)
`
`Oral L 1
`(mg/kg)
`
`50
`
`> 100
`
`Dose effecting excretion of
`0-5 mg Fe/kg/day (single day
`pharmacology)
`Dose causing serious bone
`marrow lesions (3-month
`toxicity study)
`Dose causing:
`> 500t
`serious maternal toxicity
`100
`100
`> 500t
`serious embryotoxicity
`No effect#
`serious teratogenicity
`25
`*Cataract formation 3/30 at 250 mg/kg and 14/30 at 500 mg/kg, but no
`bone marrow effects at maximum tested dose of 500 mg/kg.
`t1096 of animals at 540 mg/kg.
`*Highest dose tested 540 mg/kg
`Desferrioxamine is impermeable to most cells whereas Ll, which
`rapidly penetrates all cells and tissues, is toxic exactly in its effective
`dose range.
`Porter et all have shown that iron overload does not protect
`against bone marrow toxicity of L 1. In a 60-day toxicity study in
`iron-overloaded and non-overloaded mice, Ll (200 mg/kg) but not
`desferrioxamine at the same dose, caused significant decreases in
`white cell counts and haemoglobin. These effects were identical in
`iron-loaded and non-loaded mice, though there was a difference in
`mortality (not significant).
`The major toxic effect in animals (bone marrow depression and
`decreased white cell counts) has been reported in 5 patients. The
`frequency of reporting of this side-effect is lower than predicted
`from animal studies, but there is no "sharp contrast between serious
`toxicity in normal animals and the limited toxicity in iron-
`overloaded patients". In none of the 5 cases of agranulocytosis did
`the patient have an especially low iron load, and the most frequent
`side-effect with L1 (arthropathy) seems to occur mainly in heavily
`loaded patients.
`It is the lack of a therapeutic margin of Ll and the consistency of
`the toxicity pattern in all animal species investigated, including
`primates, which has led us to discontinue the development of this
`agent.
`
`No effect*
`
`100
`
`Pharmaceuticals Division,
`Ciba-Geigy Ltd,
`CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland
`
`FRIEDLIEB PFANNKUCH
`PHIL BENTLEY
`HANS PETER SCHNEBLI
`
`1. Porter JB, Hoyes KP, Abeysinghe RD, et al. Comparison of the subacute toxicity and
`efficacy of 3-hydmacypyridin-4-one iron chelators in overloaded and non-
`overloaded mice. Blood 1991; 78: 2727-34.
`
`SIR,-In view of the serious humanl-4 and animal toxicity
`reported with Ll we are surprised that the International Study
`Group on Oral Iron Chelators feels that Ciba-Geigy’s
`discontinuation of further development of this agent is
`"premature". Before their appeal for further trials is considered it
`may be worthwhile drawing attention to the inconsistencies and
`omissions in published trial reports.’
`Olivieri et al5 did not describe any immunological abnormalities
`in their paper but in response to our report of drug-induced lupus8
`they noted antinuclear antibodies (ANA) in 5 of 12 thalassaemic
`patients with absent antibodies to nuclear histones (AHA) before
`starting L 1.9 The evolution of these abnormalities during and after
`Ll administration was not described. Al-Refaie et al4 reported
`ANA in 2 of 12 patients before L 1, and in 4 of 12 after conclusion of
`the trial. AHA, which are more specific for drug-induced lupus,
`were not mentioned. Agarwal et alb reported no significant toxicity
`on "extensive" monitoring of the immune system but they later
`noted ANA and AHA in L 1 recipients and in thalassaemic patients
`not taking L1.3,7 Our work, on patients from the same
`socioeconomic and ethnic background in Bombay, shows that
`against some background ANA positivity in thalassaemias, there is a
`significantly higher incidence in patients taking Ll,2 We detected
`AHA in patients receiving Ll but not in those not on the drug.
`Infection-related deaths of 3 patients in India while on Ll or
`shortly after discontinuation, while felt by Agarwal et al3 to be
`unrelated to the drug, need to reassessed in view of the atrophy of
`lymphatic organs seen in animal studies (April 24, p 1088).
`
`Blood Research Centre,
`Vivina Building 3A,
`S V Road,
`Bombay 400 058, India
`
`JAYESH MEHTA
`SEEMA SINGHAL
`B. C. MEHTA
`
`1. Veys PA, Wilkes S, Al-Refaie FN, et al. The mechanism of agranulocytosis mediated
`by the oral iron chelator L1. Br J Haematol 1993; 84 (supp 1): 64.
`2. Mehta J, Chablani A, Reporter R, Singhal S, Mehta BC. Occurrence of autoantibodies
`in thalassemia major and their possible relationship with oral iron chelator L1. Br J
`Haematol 1993; 84 (suppl 1): 64.
`3. Agarwal MB, Gupte SS, Viswanathan C, et al. Long-term assessment of efficacy and
`safety of L1, an oral iron chelator, in transfusion dependent thalassaemia: Indian
`trial. Br J Haematol 1992; 82: 460-66.
`4. Al-Refaie FN, Wonke B, Hoffbrand AV, Wickens DG, Nortey P, Kontoghiorghes
`GJ. Efficacy and possible adverse effects of the oral iron chelator 1,2-dimethyl-3-
`hydroxypyrid-4-one (L1) in thalassemia major. Blood 1992; 80: 593-99.
`5. Olivieri NF, Koren G, Hermann C, et al. Comparison of oral iron chelator L1 and
`desferrioxamine in iron-loaded patients. Lancet 1990; 336: 1275-79.
`6. Agarwal MB, Gupte SS, Viswanathan C, et al. Phase II trial of 1-2,dimethyl-3-
`hydroxypyrid-4-one (L1) the oral iron chelator in 52 patients of transfusion
`dependent thalassaemia. Blood 1990; 76 (suppl 1): 52a.
`7. Agarwal MB, Gupte SS, Viswanathan C, et al. Effective oral iron chelation in patients
`of thalassemia. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium cum Workshop on
`Anemia in Children (Bombay, February, 1991): 13.1-13.13.
`8. Mehta J, Singhal S, Revankar R, Walvalkar A, Chablani A, Mehta BC. Fatal systemic
`lupus erythematosus in patient taking oral iron chelator L1. Lancet 1991; 337: 298.
`9. Olivieri NF, Koren G, Freedman MH, Roifmart C. Rarity of systemic lupus
`erythematosus after oral iron chelator L1. Lancet 1991; 337: 924.
`
`Absence of association between HLA-DR7
`and cytomegalovirus infection in renal
`transplant patients
`SIR,-Dr Kraat and colleagues (Feb 20, p 494) report a higher
`frequency of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in HLA-DR7-
`positive recipients of kidney grafts. Since 1987 we have been
`prospectively following 206 consecutive patients undergoing renal
`transplantation, with the aim of detecting CMV infection or disease.
`We have been unable to confirm Kraat and co-workers’ findings.
`Virological studies included conventional and shell vial cultures
`in blood and urine, measurement of antigenaemia by indirect
`immunofluorescence with monoclonal antibodies in buffy coat,’
`and detection of IgG and IgM antibodies (complement binding and
`enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay). Specimens were obtained
`preoperatively, weekly during the first 3 months, and then at each
`outpatient visit until 12 months after transplantation. CMV
`infection was defmed as CMV isolation in any specimen with or
`without seroconversion or a substantial increase in IgG antibodies.
`CMV disease was diagnosed if at least two tests were positive and
`the patients had two or more symptoms (fever, leucopenia,
`hepatitis, pneumonitis, or intestinal damage without other cause).
`
`Apotex Tech.
`Ex. 2021
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket