throbber
Prostaglandin F2a-l-Isopropylester Lowers Intraocular
`Pressure Without Decreasing Aqueous Humor Flow
`
`J. R. Kerstetter, M.S., R. F. Brubaker, M . D, S. E. Wilson, M . D .,
`and L. J. Kullerstrand, B.S.
`
`fluorophotometry, we performed a
`Using
`randomized, dose-response study of the ef­
`fects of a prostaglandin derivative on aqueous
`humor
`flow. Prostaglandin F 2(I-l-isopropyl-
`ester, 0.224 p,g, 0.448 p.g, and 1.120 p.g, in
`saline with polysorbate 80 was instilled into
`one eye of 20 subjects in three separate dose
`studies. Polysorbate 80 in saline was instilled
`in the fellow eye as a control. The drug had no
`measurable effect on aqueous humor flow or
`corneal endothelial permeability. Intraocular
`pressure measured eight hours after adminis­
`tration of the highest dose, 1.120 fig, was 20%
`lower in the treated eye as compared to the
`fellow eye (P < .001).
`
`PROSTAGLANDINS administered topically re­
`duce intraocular pressure in several species. 1
`For example, topical administration of prosta­
`glandin F2a (tromethamine salt) reduces intra­
`ocular pressure in rabbits.2 Lee, Podos, and
`Severin3 noted reductions in intraocular pres­
`sure in rabbits, cats, and monkeys after topical­
`ly administered prostaglandin F2„ (trometha­
`mine salt) in doses ranging from 250 to 1,000
`|xg. They observed no changes in aqueous
`humor flow as measured by fluorophotometry,
`but did observe significant increases in outflow
`facility as measured by tonography. Additional
`studies
`in cats and rhesus monkeys have
`shown that topically applied prostaglandin F2„
`(tromethamine salt) produces a transient (15- to
`
`Accepted for publication Sept. 15, 1987.
`From the Mayo Medical School (Mr. Kerstetter) and
`the Department of Ophthalmology (Drs. Brubaker and
`Wilson and Ms. Kullerstrand), Mayo Clinic and Founda­
`tion, Rochester, Minnesota. This study was supported
`by National Institutes of Health Grant EY 00634, Re­
`search to Prevent Blindness, Inc., and the Mayo Founda­
`tion.
`Reprint requests to Richard F. Brubaker, M.D., De­
`partment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester,
`MN 55905.
`
`30-minute) increase in intraocular pressure, 4
`followed by a persistent decrease in intraocular
`pressure without development of tachyphy-
`laxis when twice-daily doses are given.5
`A study of owl monkey eyes showed that
`1,000-u.g doses of prostaglandin F2o (trometha­
`mine salt) can reduce intraocular pressure by
`4.7 mm Hg in normal eyes and 25 mm Hg in
`glaucomatous eyes. 6 Crawford, Gabelt, and
`Kaufman7 showed that 100-u.g doses of topical­
`ly administered prostaglandin F2a (form not
`specified) produced an 8-mm Hg reduction in
`intraocular pressure and a reduction in aque­
`ous humor flow in some but not all of their
`experiments using cynomolgus monkeys. 7
`Camras and associates8,9 noted a 10-mm Hg
`reduction of intraocular pressure in the same
`species without an accompanying reduction of
`aqueous humor flow after a 250-u.g topical dose
`of prostaglandin F2a (tromethamine salt). These
`investigators attributed the effect to changes of
`outflow facility.
`In a study of 18 nonglaucomatous subjects,
`Giuffre10 administered a 200-u.g topical dose of
`salt) and
`prostaglandin F2a (tromethamine
`noted
`significant
`reductions of
`intraocular
`pressure in treated eyes as compared to control
`eyes. The studies cited here have shown consis­
`tent reductions of intraocular pressure in sever­
`al species with high doses of prostaglandin F2a.
`Bito and Barody11 have shown that the corne­
`al epithelium acts as a barrier to prostaglandin
`F2a. Bito12 has subsequently studied several es­
`ters of prostaglandin F2a and found that methyl,
`ethyl, and isopropyl esters reduce intraocular
`pressure in cats at much lower doses
`than
`prostaglandin F2(1. He also observed that the
`isopropyl ester of prostaglandin F2a provided
`longer-term effects than the methyl or ethyl
`esters.
`In a study of 0.1-, 0.5-, and 10-(xg doses of
`prostaglandin F 2t<-l-isopropylester in six nor­
`mal male volunteers, a dose-related reduction
`of intraocular pressure with a maximum reduc-
`
`30
`
`©AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY 105:30-34, JANUARY, 1988
`
`Micro Labs Exhibit 1033
`Micro Labs v. Santen Pharm. and Asahi Glass
`IPR2017-01434
`
`

`

`Vol. 105, No. 1
`
`Lowered Intraocular Pressure With Prostaglandins
`
`31
`
`tion eight hours after instillation was noted (A.
`Aim, M.D., and J. Villumsen, M.D., personal
`communication, 1985). The mean reduction of
`intraocular pressure eight hours after instilla­
`tion was 5.7 mm Hg (P < .02). Villumsen and
`Aim13 also studied 0.5-u.g doses of prostaglan-
`din F 2a-l-isopropylester administered at 8 A.M.
`and 8 P.M. for one day to 12 glaucomatous
`patients. They observed intraocular pressure at
`eight, 12, and 24 hours after the first dose and
`noted mean reductions in pressure of 5.7 mm
`Hg (P < .001), 7.9 mm Hg (P < .001), and 7.3
`mm Hg (P < .005), respectively.
`The purpose of this study was to measure the
`rate of flow of aqueous humor in the human eye
`after the topical administration of a range of
`doses of prostaglandin F 2o-l-isopropylester
`known to lower intraocular pressure.
`
`Subjects and Methods
`
`We selected 20 volunteers (11 men and nine
`women), ranging in age from 21 to 60 years,
`with no history of eye disease or significant
`systemic disease for the study. Subjects were
`excluded from the study for any of the follow­
`ing: (1) active ocular disease, (2) anatomic dif­
`ferences in the size and color of their eyes, (3)
`systemic drug use, (4) inability to undergo
`satisfactorily tonometry or fluorophotometry,
`(5) suspected hypersensitivity to drugs, or (6)
`participation in a trial of any other investiga-
`tional drug within two weeks. The screening
`examination included a medical and ophthal­
`mic history, visual acuity testing, slit-lamp ex­
`amination, Goldmann applanation tonometry,
`and direct ophthalmoscopy. Written, informed
`consent according to federal guidelines was
`obtained from all subjects. Preliminary
`tests
`included photogrammetry to measure the vol­
`ume of the anterior chamber. 14 Autofluores-
`cence of each cornea was also measured. 10 Re­
`sults of blood tests for pregnancy were negative
`two to three days before beginning the study in
`all female subjects.
`Prostaglandin F 2o-l-isopropylester was used
`as an ophthalmic solution at a concentration of
`22.4 u.g/100 ml. The drug was instilled by mi-
`cropipette in 1-, 2-, and 5-JJLI doses, which
`contained 0.224, 0.448, and 1.12
`|xg of
`the
`investigational drug, respectively. The study
`was conducted under investigational new drug
`exemption No. 28,391 of the Food and Drug
`Administration.
`
`Ten left and ten right eyes were randomly
`assigned to the study group. Each subject re­
`ceived a single 1-, 2-, and 5-|xl dose of the test
`drug in the selected eye and a placebo (polysor-
`bate 80 in saline) in the fellow eye in three
`separate studies spaced by a minimum of two
`weeks.
`At 2 A.M. on the day of the study each subject
`instilled 2% fluorescein
`into each eye every
`three minutes for a total of five to ten instilla­
`tions per eye. The number of instillations was
`individualized for each subject to produce the
`optimal concentration of fluorescein
`in
`the
`stroma.
`Subjects reported to the testing area at 8 A.M.
`on the day of the study. Intensity and polariza­
`tion of fluorescein were measured in both cor­
`neas and anterior chambers using the two-
`dimensional
`scanning
`fluorophotometer of
`McLaren and Brubaker. 16 After these measure­
`ments, the drug and placebo were instilled into
`the lower cul-de-sac of the subjects by micropi-
`pette; a total volume of 1, 2, or 5 u.1 was
`delivered containing 0.224 u.g, 0.448 (jig, and
`1.120 (jig of prostaglandin F2„-l-isopropylester,
`respectively. The subjects were instructed to
`keep their eyelids closed for four minutes after
`instillation to retard washout of the drug by
`tears. Hourly measurements of fluorescein in
`the cornea and anterior chamber were
`then
`made on all subjects.
`Polarization of fluorescence was measured in
`each eye four to eight hours after instillation of
`the drug. At 4 P.M. on the day of the study
`(eight hours after drug instillation), intraocu­
`lar pressure was measured
`in each eye by
`Goldmann applanation tonometry by one of
`us (S.E.W.) who did not know which eye had
`been treated. The measurements were taken
`three times, beginning with the right eye and
`alternating between eyes, and then averaged.
`Pretreatment intraocular pressures were meas­
`ured in the same manner during the screening
`examination. Pretreatment
`intraocular pres­
`sures were not measured on the study day be­
`cause of the confounding effect that fluores-
`cein-containing topical anesthetics would have
`had on the measurement of aqueous humor
`flow by fluorophotometry. At the conclusion
`of the study, an ophthalmic examination was
`again performed. Each subject was queried
`about symptoms, and any symptoms reported
`were recorded.
`Aqueous humor flow was calculated by a
`modification17 of method 2 of Jones and Mau­
`rice.18 The rate of clearance of fluorescein was
`
`Micro Labs Exhibit 1033-2
`
`

`

`32
`
`AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
`
`January, 1988
`
`calculated as the rate of disappearance of fluo-
`rescein from the combined cornea and anterior
`chamber divided by the average fluorescent
`intensity in the anterior chamber during that
`interval. The rate of diffusional clearance of
`fluorescein was assumed to be 0.25 ui/minute. 19
`
`Results
`
`All 20 subjects completed the study of the 1-
`and 2-ui doses. However, two subjects com­
`plained of pain and photophobia and were
`noted to have marked conjunctival hyperemia
`for several hours after instillation of the 2-|xl
`dose. They were excluded from tests of the 5-uJ
`dose.
`Neither of the two smaller doses caused a
`significant reduction of intraocular pressure
`eight hours after
`instillation (Table 1). The
`highest dose produced an ocular hypotensive
`effect
`that was significant eight hours after
`instillation. Intraocular pressure was 11.8 ± 2.8
`mm Hg in the treated eye and 14.4 ± 3.0 mm Hg
`in the untreated eye, a difference of approxi­
`mately 20% (P < .001).
`We were unable to demonstrate any effect of
`the drug on the rate of aqueous humor flow.
`The flow was in the range of 2.5 to 2.9 |xl/
`
`TABLE 1
`EFFECTS OF PROSTAGLANDIN F2o-1-ISOPROPYLESTER
`ON INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE
`
`TABLE 2
`EFFECTS OF PROSTAGLANDIN F2(,-1-ISOPROPYLESTER
`ON AQUEOUS HUMOR FLOW
`(jLlL/MIN)*
`
`MORNING
`(8 A.M.
`-NOON)
`
`AFTERNOON
`(NOON-8 P.M.)
`
`AVERAGE
`(8 A.M
`-8 P.M.)
`
`DOSE
`
`MEAN
`
`S.D.
`
`MEAN
`
`S.D.
`
`MEAN
`
`S.D.
`
`1 ix\ (N = 20)
`Drug
`Placebo
`2 id (N = 20)
`Drug
`Placebo
`5 M I (N = 18)
`Drug
`Placebo
`
`2.72
`2.86
`
`2.88
`2.78
`
`2.67
`2.52
`
`0.72
`0.77
`
`0.45
`0.62
`
`0.48
`0.47
`
`2.65
`2.66
`
`2.67
`2.65
`
`2.68
`2.50
`
`0.47
`0.50
`
`0.49
`0.47
`
`0.53
`0.40
`
`2.69
`2.76
`
`2.78
`2.72
`
`2.68
`2.51
`
`0.60
`0.64
`
`0.47
`0.55
`
`0.51
`0.44
`
`'Differences between drug-treated and placebo-treated eyes
`were not significant.
`
`minute under all conditions of the experiment.
`The rates of flow were generally higher in the
`morning than the afternoon in both the treated
`eye and the fellow eye (Table 2), a difference
`that can be attributed to the diurnal variation of
`aqueous humor flow in humans.
`The permeability of the corneal endothelium
`to fluorescein was not significantly altered by
`(Table 3),
`prostaglandin F 2a-l-isopropylester
`nor was there any evidence from polarization
`of fluorescence in the cornea or anterior cham-
`
`INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE (MM
`
`HG)
`
`PRETREATMENT
`
`8 HOURS
`POSTTREATMENT
`
`TABLE 3
`EFFECTS OF PROSTAGLANDIN F 2„-1-ISOPROPYL!
`ESTER
`ON ENDOTHELIAL PERMEABILITY
`x 10"4)
`(CM/MIN
`
`14.7
`14.1
`= 19
`N =
`
`2.6
`2.3
`
`14.4
`14.4
`= 19
`N =
`
`2.4
`2.5
`
`14.4
`14.6
`= 17
`N =
`
`2.3
`2.7
`
`12.9
`14.0
`
`2.6
`2.9
`■■ 20
`N =
`
`13.6
`13.4
`
`3.6
`2.7
`
`= 20
`N =
`
`2.8
`11.8*
`3.0
`14.4*
`■■ 18
`N =
`
`MORNING
`(8 A.M.-NOON)
`
`AFTERNOON
`(NOON-8 P.M.)
`
`AVE
`RAGE
`(8 A.M.
`-8 P.M.)
`
`DOSE
`
`MEAN
`
`S.D.
`
`MEAN
`
`S.D.
`
`MEAN
`
`S.D.
`
`1 ill (N = 20)
`Drug
`Placebo
`2 ill (N = 20)
`Drug
`Placebo
`5 / il (N = 18)
`Drug
`Placebo
`
`3.56
`3.69
`
`3.79
`3.70
`
`3.57
`3.52
`
`0.96
`0.68
`
`0.63
`0.70
`
`0.58
`0.62
`
`4.00
`3.94
`
`3.66
`3.65
`
`3.99
`3.91
`
`0.72
`0.63
`
`0.58
`0.46
`
`0.48
`0.66
`
`3.78
`3.82
`
`3.73
`3.68
`
`3.78
`3.72
`
`0.84
`0.66
`
`0.61
`0.58
`
`0.53
`0.64
`
`DOSE
`
`1 ,x\ (0.224 /xg)
`Drug
`Placebo
`
`2 /nl (0.448 /xg)
`Drug
`Placebo
`
`5/il(1.12/ig)
`Drug
`Placebo
`
`'Difference between drug-treated and placebo-treated eyes
`was significant (P < .001) using two-tailed f-test.
`
`'Differences between drug-tested and placebo-treated eyes
`were not significant.
`
`Micro Labs Exhibit 1033-3
`
`

`

`Vol. 105, No. 1
`
`Lowered Intraocular Pressure With Prostaglandins
`
`33
`
`TABLE 4
`EFFECTS OF PROSTAGLANDIN F2„-1-ISOPROPYLESTER ON POLARIZATION OF FLUORESCENCE*
`
`PRETREATMENT
`
`POSTTREATMENT
`
`CORNEA
`
`ANTERIOR
`CHAMBER
`
`CORNEA
`
`ANTERIOR
`CHAMBER
`
`MEAN
`
`S.D.
`
`MEAN
`
`S.D.
`
`MEAN
`
`S.D.
`
`MEAN
`
`S.D.
`
`0.167
`0.165
`
`0.154
`0.157
`
`0.171
`0.172
`
`0.036
`0.030
`
`0.022
`0.023
`
`0.023
`0.026
`
`0.031
`0.025
`
`0.023
`0.027
`
`0.026
`0.028
`
`0.023
`0.016
`
`0.016
`0.020
`
`0.014
`0.017
`
`0.176
`0.174
`
`0.175
`0.184
`
`0.188
`0.189
`
`0.043
`0.025
`
`0.023
`0.038
`
`0.022
`0.021
`
`0.033
`0.027
`
`0.019
`0.023
`
`0.026
`0.026
`
`0.018
`0.012
`
`0.011
`0.013
`
`0.015
`0.012
`
`DOSE
`1 Ail (N = 20)
`Drug
`Placebo
`2 id (N = 20)
`Drug
`Placebo
`5 MI (N = 18)
`Drug
`Placebo
`
`•Differences between drug-treated and placebo-treated eyes were not significant.
`
`ber that the drug had caused a breakdown of
`the blood-aqueous barrier (Table 4). In
`this
`experiment, polarization of
`fluorescence
`is
`used to measure any changes in the polariza­
`tion characteristics of the cornea or anterior
`chamber that would occur in response to the
`presence of additional proteins from break­
`down in the blood-aqueous barrier.
`Two subjects had moderate redness for sever­
`al hours and ocular discomfort after the 2-|i.l
`dose. Otherwise, the drug was well tolerated.
`All subjects had conjunctival hyperemia that
`lasted one to several hours after instillation.
`
`Discussion
`
`This study confirms the observations of oth­
`ers11 that low doses of topically applied prosta-
`glandin esters can reduce intraocular pressure.
`This pressure lowering effect must be the result
`of effects on outflow since we did not observe
`any decrease in the rate of clearance of fluores-
`cein. Since no significant changes in the rate of
`aqueous humor flow were noted, we calculated
`the statistical power of the experiment based on
`a previous study of 71 normal, untreated sub­
`jects, in whom the variance of our measure­
`ment technique was determined. In the present
`experiment where n = 20, the probability of
`detecting an 18% change in flow is 95%. There
`is a 50% chance that we would have detected
`
`changes in flow of approximately 10%. We be­
`lieve, as did Camras and associates 89 and Lee,
`Podos, and Severin, 3 that prostaglandin F 2a has
`no clinically significant effect on aqueous
`humor flow and that its ocular pressure lower­
`ing effect must be mediated via the outflow
`system.
`Compared to the four major classes of thera­
`peutic ocular hypotensive agents currently
`used
`for
`the
`treatment
`of
`glaucoma—
`cholinergics, adrenergic agonists, adrenergic
`blockers, and carbonic anhydrase inhibitors—
`prostaglandin F2a appears to have effects that
`are most similar to adrenergic agonists, such as
`epinephrine. First, epinephrine's effect may be
`the result of endogenous prostaglandin re­
`lease.2021 Second, both epinephrine 22 and pros­
`7 are thought to enhance uveo-
`taglandin F2a
`scleral outflow. However, ocular hypotensive
`response to prostaglandins may also be the
`result of unique mechanisms not shared by any
`currently used therapeutic agents.
`
`ACKNOWLEDGMENT
`Pharmacia AB, Uppsala, Sweden, supplied
`the prostaglandin F 2tt-l-isopropylester.
`
`References
`
`1. Bito, L. Z.: Prostaglandins, other eicosanoids,
`and
`their derivatives as potential antiglaucoma
`
`Micro Labs Exhibit 1033-4
`
`

`

`34
`
`AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
`
`January, 1988
`
`agents. In Drance, S. M. (ed.): Glaucoma. Applied
`Pharmacology in Medical Treatment. Orlando, Fla.,
`Grune and Stratton, Inc., 1984, chap. 20, pp. 477-
`505.
`2. Camras, D. B., Bito, L. Z., and Eakins, K. E.:
`Reduction of intraocular pressure by prostaglandins
`applied topically to the eyes of conscious rabbits.
`Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 16:1125, 1977.
`3. Lee, P. Y., Podos, S. M., and Severin, C: Effect
`of prostaglandin F2 alpha on aqueous humor dynam­
`ics of rabbit, cat, and monkey. Invest. Ophthalmol.
`Vis. Sci. 25:1087, 1984.
`4. Stern, F. A., and Bito, L. Z.: Comparison of the
`hypotensive and other ocular effects of prostagland­
`ins E2 and F2 alpha on cat and rhesus monkey eyes.
`Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 22:588, 1982.
`5. Bito, L. Z., Draga, A., Blanco, J., and Camras,
`C. B.: Long-term maintenance of reduced intraocular
`pressure by daily or twice daily topical application of
`prostaglandins to cat or rhesus monkey eyes. Invest.
`Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 24:312, 1983.
`6. Camras, C. B., and Bito, L. Z.: Reduction of
`intraocular pressure in normal and glaucomatous
`primate (Aotus trivirgatus) eyes by topically applied
`prostaglandin F2 alpha. Curr. Eye Res. 1:205, 1981.
`7. Crawford, K., Kaufman, P. L., and Gabelt,
`B. T.: Effects of topical PGF2(, on aqueous humor
`dynamics in cynomolgus monkeys. Curr. Eye Res.
`6:1035, 1987.
`8. Camras, C. B., Bhuyan, K. C, Rosenthal, J. S.,
`Podos, S. M., and Bhuyan, D. K.: Pathophysiolog-
`ical effects of prostaglandin (PG) F2o or epinephrine
`applied topically in monkeys. ARVO Abstracts. Sup­
`plement to Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. Philadel­
`phia, J. B. Lippincott, 1985, p. 226.
`9. Camras, C. B., Podos, S. M, Rosenthal, J. S.,
`Lee, P. Y., and Severin, C. H.: Multiple dosing of
`prostaglandin F2o or epinephrine on cynomolgus
`monkey eyes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 28:463,
`1987.
`10. Giuffre, G.: The effects of prostaglandin F2
`alpha in the human eye. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp.
`Ophthalmol. 222:139, 1985.
`
`11. Bito, L. Z., and Barody, R. A.: The penetration
`of exogenous prostaglandin and arachidonic acid
`into, and their distribution within, the mammalian
`eye. Curr. Eye Res. 1:659, 1982.
`12. Bito, L. Z.: Comparison of the ocular hypoten­
`sive efficacy of eicosanoids and related compounds.
`Exp. Eye Res. 38:181, 1984.
`13. Villumsen, J., and Aim, A.: The effect of pros­
`taglandin F2„ eye drops in open angle glaucoma.
`ARVO Abstracts. Supplement to Invest. Ophthal­
`mol. Vis. Sci. Philadelphia, J. B. Lippincott, 1987, p.
`378.
`14. Johnson, S., Passmore, J. A., and Brubaker,
`R. F.: The fluorescein distribution volume of the
`anterior chamber. Invest. Ophthalmol. 16:633, 1977.
`15. Brubaker, R. F.: The flow of aqueous humor in
`the human eye. Trans. Am. Ophthalmol. Soc. 80:391,
`1982.
`16. McLaren, J. W., and Brubaker, R. F.: A two-
`dimensional scanning ocular
`fluorophotometer.
`In­
`vest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 26:144, 1985.
`17. Brubaker, R. F., and McLaren, J. W.: Uses of
`fluorophotometry
`in glaucoma research. Ophthal­
`mology 92:884, 1985.
`18. Jones, R. F., and Maurice, D. M.: New meth­
`ods of measuring the rate of aqueous flow in man
`with fluorescein. Exp. Eye Res. 5:208, 1966.
`19. Brubaker, R. F.: Clinical evaluation of the cir­
`culation of aqueous humor. In Duane, T. D. (ed.):
`Clinical Ophthalmology. Philadelphia, Harper and
`Row Publishers, 1986, chap. 46.
`20. Camras, D. B., Feldman, S. G., Podos, S. M.,
`Christensen, R. E., Gardner, S. K., and Fazio, D. T.:
`Inhibition of the epinephrine-induced reduction of
`intraocular pressure by systemic indomethacin in
`humans. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 100:169, 1977.
`21. Bhattacherjee, P., and Hammond, B. R.: Effect
`of indomethacin on the ocular hypotensive action of
`adrenalin in the rabbit. Exp. Eye Res. 24:307, 1977.
`22. Townsend, D. J., and Brubaker, R. F.: Immedi­
`ate effect of epinephrine on aqueous formation in the
`normal human eye as measured by fluorophotome­
`try. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 19:256, 1980.
`
`OPHTHALMIC MINIATURE
`One case of acute and two cases of chronic glaucoma were treated by
`excisions of a portion of the iris in each eye. The acute case completely
`recovered with capillary hemorrhage; the two chronic cases are improving.
`In cases in which the operation has been successfully performed,
`the
`aqueous humour is not accumulated in the anterior chamber, but appears
`to escape through the wound as it is secreted. No active
`inflammatory
`symptoms have occurred after treatment as one would expect after so
`severe an operation.
`
`British Medical Journal, March 6, 1858, p. 181
`
`Micro Labs Exhibit 1033-5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket