throbber
IPR Page 1/8
`
`Santen/Asahi Glass Exhibit 2024
`Micro Labs v. Santen Pharm. and Asahi Glass
`IPR2017-01434
`
`

`

`Volume 4 number 7 1985
`
`Current
`Eye
`Research
`
`rr
`
`Pharmacological testing in the laser-induced monkey glaucoma model
`innnee
`
`Ping-Yu Lee, Steven M. Podos, Julia R. Howard-Williams, Colette H. Severin, Aron D. Rose and Mare
`J. Siegela
`Department of Ophthalmology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine of the City University of New York,
`NY 10029, USAenneEEEUEUEnEIEda
`
`Received on 26 March 1985; accepted on 1] June 1985
`
`ABSTRACT
`Glaucoma was induced in cynomolgus monkeys by
`photocoagulating the trabecular meshwork with the
`argon laser. Repeat treatments were often
`necessary and wide intraocular pressure f luctua-
`tions were characteristic.
`Baseline intraocular pressure was measured
`with a calibrated pneumatonometer hourly for six
`hours.
`On a succeeding day a baseline measure-
`ment was made, 50 a] of the drug to be tested
`applied, and six hourly measurements of
`intraocular pressure repeated.
`The effects on
`intraocular pressure of timolol, epinephrine,
`pilocarpine, vanadate, prostaglandin Foa
`(PGFox), forskolin, and corynanthine were
`(p <
`tested in at
`least eight eyes. Significant
`0.05) reductions of
`intraocular pressure were
`produced by 0.5% timolol,
`2% epinephrine,
`4%
`pilocarpine, 1% vanadate, 500 pg of PGFoa and
`1% forskolin.
`Five per cent corynanthine
`produced no significant lowering of
`intraocular
`pressure.
`Tonography revealed an increased outflow
`facility associated with the reduction of
`intraocular pressure 2 hours after the admin-
`istration of 4% pilocarpine.
`This glaucoma animal model may be useful
`investigating agents that
`lower intraocular
`pressure by a variety of mechanisms.
`
`in
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`The search for animals with different types of
`spontaneous glaucoma has revealed a few models in
`rabbits, dogs, chickens, and primates (1).
`The
`general disadvantage of most animal models, with
`the exception of primates,
`is that the irido-
`corneal angle anatomy is different
`from that of
`the human. Although all species seem to have a
`continuous endothelial
`lining of the aqueous
`outflow channels,
`there are major differences in
`the presence of pectinate ligaments,
`a limited
`ciliary body musculature, and a scleral venous
`plexus instead of Schlemm's canal
`(2).
`Historically,
`investigators have tried to
`create animal models of glaucoma since as early
`as 1870.
`Some methods have failed and others
`
`produced transient or prolonged elevations of
`intraocular pressure. Glaucoma has been produced
`in rabbits by the injection of 1% kaolin into the
`anterior chamber, and by encircling the globe
`with cotton threads or rubber bands (1,3).
`Kupfer (4), by inserting a polyethylene tubing
`into the angle of the anterior chamber of the
`rabbit eye, produced an elevated intraocular
`pressure within 24 hours which remained elevated
`for at
`least 3 months.
`Samis (5) and Kazdan (6)
`created glaucoma in rabbits by blocking the angle
`of the anterior chamber with methyl cel lulose.
`Hamasaki and Ellerman (7) found that injection of
`alpha-chymotrypsin directly into ow] monkey eyes
`caused an elevation in intraocular pressure.
`This technique has also been used successfully in
`rhesus monkeys (8) and rabbits (9).
`Intraocular
`pressure elevations lasting from 2 to 42 days
`have been produced in squirrel and cynomolgus
`monkey eyes by anterior chamber injections of
`autologous, fixed red blood cells (10).
`Gaasterland and Kupfer
`(11) described a new
`method for the production of sustained, elevated
`intraocular pressure in the rhesus monkey by
`repeated, circumferential argon laser photocoagu-
`lation of the mid-trabecular meshwork. This
`
`intra-
`technique caused a sustained elevation of
`ocular pressure, reduction of outflow facility,
`and retinal
`and optic nerve changes similar to
`those seen in human chronic, open-angle glaucoma.
`This model has been available for studies for 11
`
`years. Quigley and Hohman (12) treated the
`trabecular meshwork of cynomolgus monkey eyes
`with the argon laser by a variety of protocols in
`an attempt
`to cause moderate, consistent
`intraocular pressure elevation. This was
`achieved most satisfactorily with deliveries of
`
`i ©
`
`IRL Press Limited, Oxford, England.
`
`775
`
`IPR Page 2/8
`
`IPR Page 2/8
`
`

`

`Current
`Eye
`Research
`
`
`
`
`least
`0.5 to 1.0 seconds and a total energy of at
`50 joules.
`8y light and electron microscopy,
`the
`trabecular beams were blunted, and scattered
`
`The disc changes in
`synechiae were present.
`these experimental eyes have been similar to
`
`those previously described in human eyes with
`glaucoma (13,14),
`A satisfactory animal model has not been
`available for the investigation of the effect of
`a number of commonly used clinical and
`
`experimental drugs for the treatment of glaucoma.
`The experimental model of glaucoma in rabbit
`induced by the posterior chamber injection of
`alpha-chymotrypsin has been studied as to the
`effects of timolol, epinephrine, norepinephrine,
`isoprotereno] and propranolol! on intraocular
`pressure (15).
`The effect of topical pilocarpine
`on intraocular pressure has been studied in
`
`normotensive and glaucomatous beagles (16). We
`carried out a study of the effect of topically
`
`applied timolol, epinephrine, pilocarpine,
`vanadate, prostaglandin Foa, forskolin and
`corynanthine on intraocular pressure in the
`laser-induced monkey glaucoma model.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Eight cynomolgus monkeys weighing 3 to 4 kg,
`were used. Baseline examination showed eyes with
`normal anterior chamber angles, normal
`intra-
`ocular pressure, normal outflow facility, clear
`ocular media, and normal optic nerveheads.
`
`Following baseline examination, 13 eyes
`in 3
`(bilateral
`in 5 monkeys and unilateral
`monkeys) were treated using the argon laser
`(Coherent Radiation Model 9900, U.S.A.).
`Ketamine hydrochloride was
`injected intra-
`muscularly (5-10 mg/kg) for sedation during laser
`therapy.
`The eyes were treated with topical
`proparacaine 0.5% and photocoagulated using a
`single mirror goniolens specially made to
`cynomolgus monkey specifications (Ocular
`Instruments, Bellevue, Washington, U.5.A.).
`Between 50 and 130 50-micron spots of 1000-1500
`mW power and 0.5 seconds exposure time were
`applied to the mid-portion of the trabecular
`
`meshwork for 360°,
`
`Fundus examinations and
`
`intraocular pressure measurements were repeated
`every seven days. Retreatment of the trabecular
`meshwork with laser was done if the intraocular
`
`the
`
`pressure remained normal.
`For the intraocular pressure measurements,
`monkeys were kept
`in a sitting position in
`specially designed chairs throughout each experi-
`ment,
`The intraocular pressure was measured with
`a Model 30R pneumatonometer (Digilab, Inc.,
`Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.A.) in animals
`lightly anesthetized with ketamine hydrochloride,
`3-5 mg/kg given intramuscularly, about
`5 minutes
`before each measurement.
`The instrument was
`
`calibrated by the manufacturer for humans and the
`verifier was used to check the tonometer
`
`calibration. Topical 0.5% proparacaine
`anesthesia was instilled prior to all
`intraocular
`pressure measurements.
`
`The drugs employed included sodium chloride
`0.9%,
`timolol maleate 0.5% (Merck Sharp & Dohme,
`West Point, Pa., U.S.A.), L-epinephrine HC]
`2%
`(Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, Texas,
`U.S.A.), pilocarpine HC] 4% (Alcon, Humacao,
`Puerto Rico, U.S.A.), prostaglandin Foo
`(PGFox),
`5 mg/m)
`(The Upjohn Co., Kalamazoo,
`Michigan, U.S.A.), vanadate (NaV03)
`(E, Merck,
`Darmstadt, Germany) prepared as a 1% solution in
`distilled water,
`10% DMSO, and 5% Tween 80,
`forskolin (Calbiochem Behring Co., La Jolla,
`Calif., U.S.A.) prepared as a 1% suspension in
`isotonic buffered saline containing 0.5%
`methylcellulose, and corynanthine (Sigma Co., St.
`Louis, Mo., U.S.A.) prepared as a 5% solution in
`distilled water.
`The vanadate, forskolin, and
`corynanthine were prepared fresh daily prior to
`topical ocular delivery.
`We did not use vehicles
`in the control measurements for vanadate and
`forskolin because the vehicles had no effects on
`
`intraocular pressure in normal cynomolgus monkey
`eyes in our previous studies.
`For all
`
`One drop
`experiments a 50 pl drop size was used.
`(50 1) was used of sodium chloride,
`timolol,
`L-epinephrine, pilocarpine, vanadate, forskolin,
`and corynanthine, and two drops were used of
`
`— 7
`
`76
`
`IPR Page 3/8
`
`IPR Page 3/8
`
`

`

`Current
`Eye
`Research
`
`
`PGFog three to five minutes apart.
`The glaucomatous monkeys underwent baseline
`(control day) and drug treated (treated day)
`6-hour diurnal curves, the intraocular pressure
`being recorded at 9:30 a.m., 10 a.m., 10:30 a.m.,
`11:30 a.m., 12:30 p.m., 1:30 p.m., 2:30 p.m., and
`3:30 p.m,
`The baseline diurnal curve served as a
`control and was made 1 or 2 days before the
`experimental (treated) diurnal curve.
`On the
`experimental day baseline intraocular pressure
`was measured at 9:30 a.m,
`Each drug was admin-
`istered to both eyes of the monkey immediately
`after the 9:30 a.m, measurement
`(0 hour).
`
`Included in this study were those monkey eyes in
`which the intraocular pressure was 22 mm Hg or
`more in both the baseline diurnal curve and the
`
`drug treated baseline intraocular pressure
`measurements.
`A two-week washout period was
`
`employed between testing each drug on the same
`monkey. Occasionally the same eye was used twice
`to test the same drug.
`Tonography was performed after using 4%
`pilocarpine with an EDT-103 tonography unit
`(Alcon). Baseline outflow facility was
`determined between 9 a.m. and 10 a.m., 2 hours
`before administration of 4% pilocarpine.
`
`Tonography was repeated 2 hours after drug
`administration. Outflow facility values were
`
`approximated from the 1955 Friedenwald tables.
`We employed two methods to analyze the changes
`intraocular pressure after drug administra-
`of
`tion, because of
`the wide intraocular pressure
`fluctuations in the glaucomatous monkey mode).
`Method 1: The intraocular pressures on the
`treated day were compared to that on the control
`day. Method 2:
`The differences in intraocular
`pressures at
`intervals after therapy between the
`treated and control day measurements were
`compared to the initial
`(0 hour) differences
`between the treated and control day values.
`
`RESULTS
`
`meshwork and caused immediate blanching, bubble
`formation, and pigment scatter. Occasionally,
`small hyphema was noted.
`The intraocular
`pressure often fell the week following treatment
`and rose on the subsequent week or fell
`if the
`
`a
`
`treatment had been inadequate. Three eyes
`maintained a raised intraocular pressure after
`only one treatment session of 56-72 joules but
`most eyes needed 2-5 treatment sessions. Wide
`pressure fluctuations were noted in all monkey
`eyes as previously reported by Pederson and
`Gaasterland (13). Optic disc cupping was
`ultimately noted in 8 out of the 13 eyes during
`the course of this study. All eyes showed fixed
`mydriasis which may be due to laser-induced
`damage of ciliary nerves that pass through the
`ciliary body and innervate the iris sphincter
`(13).
`The effects of sodium chloride,
`
`timolol,
`
`epinephrine, pilocarpine, vanadate, PGFo4,
`forskolin, and corynanthine on the intraocular
`pressure in this glaucomatous monkey model are
`shown in Table l.
`
`Intraocular pressures before a single
`instillation of these drugs (0 hour) were similar
`in treated and contro) day measurements in all
`
`Sodium chloride 0.9% instillations had
`groups.
`no significant effect on intraocular pressure,
`comparing control and drug treated 6-hour diurnal
`curves.
`
`The 0.5% timolol significantly (p < 0.05)
`lowered intraocular pressure from 3 to 6 hours
`after instillation.
`The maximum effect occurred
`
`5 hours after drug administration, and persisted
`at this level for an additional
`1 hour, at which
`time the experiments were terminated.
`Topical application of 2% epinephrine to the
`monkey eyes produced a significant (p < 0.05)
`decrease in intraocular pressure occurring
`between 0.5 and 6 hours after drug administra-
`tion.
`The maximum reduction in intraocular
`
`pressure, occurred 1 hour after drug applica-
`tion.
`
`Elevated intraocular pressure (10P) was
`achieved in all 13 eyes treated with the argon
`Four percent pilocarpine produced a
`laser. Treatment was to the mid-trabecular
`significant
`(p < 0.05) reduction of intraocular
`
`
`IPR Page 4/8
`
`Li?
`
`IPR Page 4/8
`
`

`

`Current
`Eye
`Research
`
`
`Table 1: Effect of Sodium Chloride, Timolol, Epinephrine, Pilocarpine, Vanadate, PGFoa, Forskolin, and
`Corynanthine, Topically Administered, on the Intraocular Pressure in Glaucomatous Cynomolgus Monkey Eyes
`
`Groupst
`
`Eye
`No.
`
`QO Hr¥
`
`0.5 hr
`
`1 hr
`
`2 hrs
`
`3 hrs
`
`4 hrs
`
`5 hrs
`
`6 hrs
`
`Mean intraocular pressure (mm Hg + S.E.)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Control 32.942.8©33.743.312 36,0+3.4 35,843.6 35,443.49 34.743,2 35.543.2 35,043.09
`
`Sodium
`
`chloride 0.9% 33.1H4.2©32,444.312 34,0+3.6 33,7+3.8 33.44+3.8 33.543.8 33.043.8 32.94.09
`
`Control
`Timo1ol, 0.5%
`
`Control
`Epinephrine,
`
`2%
`
`8
`8
`
`8
`8
`
`35.944.4
`36.874.6
`
`38.343.3
` 34,673,5
`
`34.144.4
`34.664.3
`
`32.5+4.4
`29.974.4
`
`28,943.8
`25.443.7
`
` 29,643.9
` 22,974.1§
`
`29,3+3.8
`21.474.5§
`
`27,8+3.9
`19.843.7§
`
`28.0+4.0
`20.973.7§
`
` 39.543.5
`28.493.6§
`
`40.043.3
`28.874.2§
`
`39.543.8
`29.574.6§
`
`39.843.9
`30.344.6§
`
`39.044.0
`29.874.8§
`
` 38.0+4.3
`28.074.9§
`
` 35.644.5
`26, 374.6*
`
`31.9+3.1
`32.742.9
`33.6+2.9
`33,6+3.0
`34.14+2.9
`34.143.2
`34,4+3,3
`35.0+3.4
`14
`Control
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pilocarpine, 24.273.2§©24.03.4*4% 14 33,773.2 25.443.2§ 23,143.36 23,573.26 24.473.3§ 23.973.3§
`
`
`
`Control 41.143.7—39.443.78 39,143,8 40,143.9 41,043.7 42.143.4 42.943.4 42,543.69
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Vanadate,
`1%
`8
`37.344,1
`36,343,8*
`37,643.9* 35,644,4
`34,374.7*
`34,944.8
`34,644.4
`35,644.3
`
`
`
`Control 29.74+3.4=28.643.3 32.144,0=30.4+3.89 32.243.9 28.7+4,1 27,3+3.4 26.4+3.0
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PGFoa, 0.005% 28.473.5927.1F73.7§9 -32.772.8 32,173.0 25.943.9§ 23.8F3.7§ 24.773.6 24. 773.4
`
`
`
`
`Control 32.443.8©29.843.69 33.043.8 32.3+3.9 31.943.6 33.943.7 34.143.9 —-28.743.2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Forskolin,
`1%
`5
`33.643.2
` 29.144.0
`27,844.18 30.144.4
`30, 044.3
`29.444.4
`29.244.3
`28.7+4.5
`
`33,04+3.6
`32.943.5
`32,0+3,4
`31,9+3.0
`31.6+2.9
`33.04+2.7
`33.842.9
`34.643.0
`14
`Control
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Corynanthine,5% 14 31.143.2929.343.5929.343.6©29.143.732.143.1t . 133. 30. 5+3 8F 30. 445.5 31.644.1
`
`
`
`(sodium chloride, timolol, epinephrine,
`tBoth eyes of the drug-treated group were treated with 50 yl
`pilocarpine, vanadate,
`forskolin, and corynanthine) or 100 1 (PGF2a) of the indicated concentration.
`Time after administration
`
`*Significantly different (p < 0.05) from the control day measurements at corresponding intervals, paired t-test.
`
`(p < 0.05) from the control day measurements at corresponding intervals and the
`$Significantly different
`differences between the treated and control day measurements significantly different
`(p < 0.05) from the initia
`(O hr) differences between the treated and control day measurements, paired t-test.
`
`pressure at 0,5 to 6 hours after the drug
`administration.
`The maximum effect occurred at
`to 2 hours.
`
`1
`
`One percent vanadate significantly (p < 0.05)
`decreased intraocular pressure in the treated
`eyes at 0.5, 1, and 3 hours only comparing
`control and treated day measurements.
`The
`maximum reduction occurred 3 hours after drug
`administration.
`
`Topical application of 500 yg of PGFoato
`the monkey eyes produced a significant
`(p < 0.05)
`decrease in intraocular pressure occurring
`between 2 to 4 hours after drug administration.
`The levels of
`intraocular pressure reduction were
`Similar at 2, 3, and 4 hours.
`
`One percent forskolin significantly (p < 0.05)
`lowered intraocular pressure only at 1 hour after
`drug administration.
`There was no significant (p > 0.1) difference
`in intraocular pressure between treated and
`control eyes after 5% corynanthine
`administration.
`
`In 13 eyes of 8 qlaucomatous monkeys, 2 hours
`after a topical administration of 4% pilocarpine,
`the mean intraocular pressure was significantly
`{p < 0.001) reduced in the treated eyes as com-
`pared to the baseline value, and the mean outflow
`
`facility was significantly (p < 0.01) increased
`as compared to the baseline value (Table 2).
`Before laser photocoagulation,
`the intraocular
`
`
`778
`
`IPR Page 5/8
`
`IPR Page 5/8
`
`

`

`Current
`Eye
`Research
`
`
`The Effect of 4% Pilocarpine on the
`Table 2.
`Outflow Facility of 13 Eyes of 8 Glaucomatous
`Monkeys
`
`Intraocular
`
`pressure
`mean + S.E.
`mm_Hg)
`35.7 FS
`226+ 2.5%
`
`Out fT ow
`
`facility
`mean + S.E£.
`(ui /min/mm Hg
`0.10 + 0.02
`0.21 + 0.03t
`
`Baseline
`Treated
`
`*Significantly different as compared to baseline
`(p < 0.001), paired t-test.
`tSignificantly different as compared to baseline
`(p < 0.01), paired t-test.
`
`pressure was 19.6 + 0.5 mm Hg (mean + S.E.) and
`the outflow facility was 0.57 + 0.05 wl/min/mm Hg
`in the 13 monkey glaucoma eyes.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`The open anterior chamber angles and the optic
`nervehead changes in the monkey eyes with
`elevated intraocular pressure induced by laser
`treatment of the trabecular meshwork are similar
`
`to the findings in human eyes with open-angle
`glaucoma.
`The glaucomatous monkey model differs
`from human glaucoma by the presence of scattered
`anterior synechiae and wide intraocular pressure
`fluctuations.
`The weekly intraocular pressure
`fluctuation in the monkey glaucoma eyes (24 +12
`mm Hg, mean IOP fluctuation + $.0.) is greater
`than in untreated human primary open-angle
`glaucoma. This finding is in agreement with that
`of previous workers (11,13).
`The mean maximum
`diurnal
`intraocular pressure fluctuation in the
`13 monkey glaucoma eyes is 8.1 mm Hg.
`Gaasterland and Kupfer (11) report that outflow
`facility, determined in laser-induced glaucoma of
`rhesus monkeys,
`ranges from 0.02 to 0.11
`yl/min/mm Hg
`(normal values: 0.33 to 0.75
`ul/min/mm Hg).
`The mean outflow facility is 0.10
`+ 0.02 y1/min/mm Hg (mean + S.E.)
`(normal values:
`0.57 + 0.05 yl/min/mm Hg)
`in our studies in 13
`cynomolgus glaucomatous monkey eyes.
`The two
`results are similar.
`
`in
`The present study employs drops of 50 yl
`order to mimic the clinical situation with regard
`to drop volume.
`Of note, a 50 pl drop is very
`large for the small monkey conjunctival cul de
`sac.
`
`The present experiments demonstrate that
`topical application of timolol, epinephrine,
`vanadate, PGFaa, pilocarpine, and forskolin
`significantly lower intraocular pressure in the
`laser-induced monkey glaucoma model and corynan-
`thine has no significant effect.
`The intraocular pressure lowering effects of
`timolol, epinephrine, and pilocarpine in this
`
`monkey model are consistent with their actions in
`clinical use.
`It is reassuring that the latter
`two compounds which act predominantly by
`increasing outflow facility are effective in the
`glaucomatous monkey eye since laser damage to the
`outflow mechanism must be rather extensive to
`
`In the present
`create the ocular hypertension.
`study,
`the ocular hypotensive effect of
`pilocarpine is associated with an increase of
`outflow facility measured tonographical ly.
`Vanadate, a potent inhibitor of the enzyme
`sodium-potassium-activated adenosine triphospha-
`tase [(Nat, Kt)ATPase],
`lowers intraocular
`pressure in rabbits (17).
`The fall
`in
`intraocular pressure is not associated with
`significant changes in outflow facility or
`episcleral venous pressure. Topical
`administration of 1% vanadate in a formulation
`
`designed to enhance penetration reduces
`intraocular pressure in normal cynomolgus monkey
`eyes associated with significant decreases in
`aqueous flow (18).
`The effects of this
`formulation of vanadate in the glaucona monkey
`model are less impressive than those of the drugs
`in clinical use.
`
`Topical application of either prostaglandin
`PGEo or PGFoa effectively reduces the
`intraocular pressure in rabbits, cats, and
`monkeys (19-21). Tonography reveals an increased
`facility of outflow but no change in aqueous flow
`simultaneous with the reduction of
`intraocular
`
`pressure in the normal eyes of cats and monkeys
`
`=
`
`779
`
`IPR Page 6/8
`
`IPR Page 6/8
`
`

`

`Current
`Eye
`Research
`
`
`the change in outflow facility does not
`As
`(22).
`account for the total observed reduction in
`
`intraocular pressure, other mechanisms may be
`possible which may or may not be operant
`in the
`glaucomatous monkey model eye. Nevertheless, of
`the experimental drugs used in this study,
`PGFoa has the most significant effect on
`intraocular pressure.
`
`Forskolin is a unique activator of adenylate
`cyclase (23). Caprioli and Sears (24) report
`that topical ocular application of forskolin
`lowers intraocular pressure in rabbit, monkey,
`and humans and reduces aqueous flow in rabbit.
`In rabbits,
`intracameral
`injection of forskolin
`jowers intraocular pressure and increases outflow
`
`facility as measured by a constant pressure
`perfusion technique (25),
`A recent study (26)
`notes that
`topical administration of a 1%
`forskolin suspension significantly reduces
`intraocular pressure in normal cynomolgus monkey
`eyes associated with a signficant decrease in
`aqueous humor flow measured by a fluorophoto-
`metric technique and without change in
`tonographic outflow facility.
`The reductions of
`intraocular pressure induced in the present study
`are minimal.
`
`a selective oy-adrenergic
`Corynanthine,
`antagonist,
`is effective in the reduction of
`intraocular pressure when topically applied to
`the normal eyes of rabbits and monkeys (27).
`fall
`in intraocular pressure is not associated
`with significant changes in outflow facility or
`aqueous humor flow.
`The absence of an
`intraocular pressure effect
`in the glaucomatous
`monkey eye may reflect a severe reduction of
`the
`uveoscleral outflow mechanism induced by the
`laser procedure.
`
`The
`
`(1) suggests that the laser-induced
`Gelatt
`glaucoma monkey model will probably be most
`useful for the study of posterior segment changes
`as the extensive iridocorneal angle scarring
`will, for the most part, minimize many
`physiological and pharmacological alterations
`affecting aquecus outflow.
`The present study,
`however, demonstrates that the glaucoma monkey
`
`is not only suitable for investigating drug
`model
`that affect aqueous humor production (ji.e.,
`timolol, vanadate, forskolin), but also suitable
`for investigating drugs that act on outflow
`(j.e., epinephrine, pilocarpine, PGF2a).
`Drawbacks of this glaucoma model are the wide
`intraocular pressure fluctuations and the
`
`instability of the model which limits long-term
`experiments. Short-term pharmacological trials
`utilizing tonography and fluorophotometry are in
`progress.
`
`ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
`
`The authors would like to acknowledge
`Elizabeth Wilkins for assistance in preparation
`of the manuscript,
`This work was supported in part by grants
`EY03651 and EYO1867 from the National Eye
`Institute, Bethesda, Maryland and by an
`unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent
`Blindness,
`Inc. Dr. Siegel was supported by a
`Mary and Alexander P. Hirsch award from Fight for
`Sight, Inc., N.Y¥., N.Y.
`
`CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
`
`Steven M. Podos, M.D., Department of
`Ophthalmology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine of
`the City University of New York, One Gustave L.
`Levy Place, New York, N.Y.
`10029.
`
`REFERENCES
`(1977) Animal models for
`1. Gelatt, K.N.
`glaucoma.
`Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 16,
`592-596.
`(1971) Ultrastructure of the
`2. Tripathi, R.C.
`exit pathway of the aqueous in lower mammals.
`Exp, Eye Res, 12, 311-314,
`3. Kalvin, N.H., Hamasaki, and Gass, J.D.M,
`(1966) Experimental glaucoma in monkeys.
`Arch, Ophthalmol. 76, 82-93.,
`intraocular
`4. Kupfer, C.
`(1962) Studies of
`pressure: II, The histopathology of
`experimentally increased intraocular pressure
`in the rabbit.
`Invest. Ophthalmol. 1,
`474-479,
`~
`(1962)
`5. Samis, W.D.
`An experimental method to
`produce angle block in rabbits and the use of
`phospholine iodide after angle block.
`Am. J.
`Ophthalmol. 54, 1089-1091,
`6. Kazdan, J.d.(1963) Experimental angle block
`avoiding paracentesis reflex.
`Am. J.
`Ophthatmo!. ‘56, 836,
`
`rra
`780
`
`IPR Page 7/8
`
`IPR Page 7/8
`
`

`

`Current
`Eye
`Research
`
`i.
`
`22,
`
`(1965)
`Hamasaki, D.I. and Ellerman, N.
`Abolition of the electroretinogram following
`injection of a-chymotrypsin into the vitreous
`and anterior chamber of mankey. Arch.
`Ophthalmol. 73, 843-850.
`(1969)
`. Lessell, S. and Kuwabara, T.
`Experimental qg-chymotrypsin glaucoma. Arch.
`Ophthalmol. 81, 853-864.
`. Sears, D.
`(1974) Blood-aqueous
`andSears, M.
`barrier and alpha-chymotrypsin glaucoma in
`rabbits.
`Am.
`J. Ophthalmol. 77, 378-383,
`Quigley, H.A.
`and Addicks, E.M.
`(1980)
`Chronic experimental glaucoma in primates:
`Il. Effect of extended intraocular pressure
`elevation on optic nerve head and axonal
`transport.
`Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 19,
`137-152.
`~~
`(1974)
`Gaasterland, D. and Kupfer, C.
`Experimental glaucoma in the rhesus monkey,
`Invest. Ophthalmol. 13, 455-457,
`Quigley, H.A. and Hohman, R.M.
`(1983) Laser
`energy levels for trabecular meshwork damage
`in the primate eye.
`Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis.
`Sci. 24, 1305-1307.
`Pederson, J.E. and Gaasterland, D.E.
`Laser-induced primate glaucoma:
`I.
`Progression of cupping. Arch. Ophthalmol.
`102, 1689-1692,
`(1984)
`Radius, R.L. and Pederson, J.E.
`Laser-induced primate glaucoma: II.
`Histopathology. Arch. Ophthalmol. 102,
`1693-1698.
`Vareilles, P., Silverstone, 0., Plazonnet,
`B., Douarec, J.-C.L., Sears, M.L., and Stone,
`C.A.
`(1977) Comparison of the effects of
`timolol and other adrenergic agents on
`intraocular pressure in the rabbit.
`Invest.
`Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 16, 987-996.
`Gwin, R.M., Gelatt, K.N., Gum, G.G.,
`Peiffer, Jr., R.L., and Williams, L.W.
`The effect of topical pilocarpine on
`intraocular pressure and pupil size in the
`normotensive and glaucomatous beagle.
`Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 16,
`1143-1148.
`Krupin, T., Becker, B., and Podos, S.M,
`(1980) Topical vanadate lowers intraocular
`pressure in rabbits.
`Invest. Ophthalmol.
`Vis. Sci. 19, 1360-1363.
`Podos, S.M., Lee, P., Severin, C., and
`Mittag, T.
`(1984) The effect of vanadate on
`aqueous humor dynamics in cynomolgus monkeys.
`Invest. Ophthalmol Vis. Sci. 25, 359-361.
`Camras, C.B., Bito, L.Z., andEakins, K.E.
`(1977) Reduction of intraocular pressure by
`prostaglandins applied topically to the eyes
`of conscious rabbits.
`Invest. Ophthalmol.
`Vis. Sci. 16, 1125-1134,
`(1982) Comparison
`Stern, F.A. and Bito, L.Z.
`of the hypotensive and other ocular effects
`of prostaglandins Eo and Faw on cat and
`rhesus monkey eyes.
`Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis.
`Sci. 22, 588-598.
`(1981) Reduction
`Camras, C.B, and Bito, L.Z.
`of
`intraocular pressure in normal and
`glaucomtous primate (Aotus trivirgatus) eyes
`by topically applied prostaglandin Faq.
`Curr. Eye Res. 1, 205-209.
`
`
`(1984)
`
`Lee, P., Podos, $.M., and Severin, C.
`Effect of prostaglandin Fog on aqueous
`humor dynamics of rabbit, cat, and monkey.
`Invest. Ophthalmol, Vis. Sci. 25,
`1087-1093.
`(1981) Forskolin:
`Seamon, K.B. and Daly, J.W.
`a unique ditepene activator of cyclic AMP-
`generating systems.
`J. Cyclic. Nucl. Res. 7,
`201-224,
`~
`Jd. and Sears, M.
`Caprioli,
`(1983) Forskolin
`lowers intraocular pressure in rabbits,
`monkeys, and man.
`Lancet 1, 958-960.
`Bartels, 5.P., Lee, S.R., and Neufeld, A.H.
`(1982/1983) Forskolin stimulates cyclic AMP
`synthesis,
`lowers intraocular pressure and
`increases outflow facility in rabbits. Curr.
`Eye Res. 2, 673-681.
`Lee, P, Podos, S.M., Mittag, T., and
`Severin, C.
`(1984) Effect of topically
`applied forskolin on aqueous humor dynamics
`in cynomolgus monkey.
`Invest. Ophthalmol.
`Vis. Sci. 25, 1206-1209,
`Serle, J.B., Stein, A.d., Podos, S.M., and
`Severin, C.H.
`(1984) Corynanthine and
`aqueous humor dynamics in rabbits and
`monkeys. Arch. Ophthalmol, 102, 1385-1388.
`
`23.
`
`24,
`
`25.
`
`26.
`
`27,
`
`(1984)
`
`(1977)
`
`10,
`
`ll.
`
`le.
`
`13.
`
`14.
`
`15.
`
`16.
`
`i
`
`18.
`
`13.
`
`20.
`
`Zl,
`
`IPR Page8/8
`
`781
`
`IPR Page 8/8
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket