throbber
Laser-Induced Primate Glaucoma
`
`I. Progression of Cupping
`Jonathan E. Pederson, MD, Douglas E. Gaasterland, MD
`
`\s=b\Sustained intraocular pressure ele-
`vations were induced in 15 monkey eyes
`by argon laser photocoagulation of
`the
`trabecular meshwork. Large fluctuations
`of IOP resulted. Posttreatment goniosco-
`py revealed an open angle with scattered
`low peripheral anterior synechiae. Optic
`disc cupping progressed during pressure
`elevations, manifested first as posterior
`bowing of the optic nerve head and peri-
`papillary tissues. Reversal of
`this early
`phase of cupping occurred in eight eyes
`during spontaneous normalization of IOP.
`In most eyes, as cupping evolved from
`saucerization to a deeper cup,
`the cup
`remained round. In four eyes, focal slop-
`ing of the cup to the inferotemporal rim
`occurred with nerve fiber layer defects.
`Total cupping with undermining of the rim
`occurred in five eyes with prolonged IOP
`elevation. Laser-induced primate glauco-
`ma has features in common with juvenile
`human glaucoma and is a useful model for
`the study of cupping of the optic nerve
`head.
`(Arch Ophthalmol
`1692)
`
`1984;102:1689-
`
`Argon laser photocoagulation of the
` ** trabecular meshwork has recent¬
`ly gained favor in the treatment of
`open-angle glaucoma.1 If the entire
`circumference of the trabecular mesh¬
`work is treated, approximately 10
`joules of energy are used. However,
`
`Accepted for publication May 18, 1984.
`From the Department of Ophthalmology, Uni-
`versity of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Dr Pederson);
`and the National Eye Institute, National Insti-
`tutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (Dr Gaaster-
`land).
`Read in part before the Association for
`Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Saraso-
`ta, Fla, April 28, 1981.
`Reprint requests to Box 493 Mayo Memorial
`Bldg, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
`55455 (Dr Pederson).
`
`laser photocoagulation can induce
`glaucoma in monkey eyes if more than
`50 joules are applied to the trabecular
`meshwork.2·3 Laser-induced primate
`See also pp 1604, 1626,
`1629, 1693, and 1699.
`glaucoma is typified by large fluctua¬
`tions in intraocular pressure, allowing
`for study of
`the progression and
`reversal of cupping.4 To our knowl¬
`edge, the clinical features of optic disc
`changes have not been described. The
`present report describes the clinical
`features of laser-induced glaucoma in
`the monkey, with special emphasis on
`the
`the development of cupping of
`optic nerve head.
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`Fourteen monkeys, ten rhesus and four
`initially weighing 2.5 to 7.1
`cynomolgus,
`kg, were used in this study. Pretreatment
`optic disc photographs and IOP measure¬
`ments were made. With the use of pento-
`barbital sodium anesthesia, 15 eyes under¬
`went argon laser photocoagulation of the
`trabecular meshwork with an argon laser
`(Coherent model
`photocoagulator
`900)
`using a small Koeppe lens or single-mirror
`Goldmann goniolens. Laser settings were
`as follows: 50 Mm, 700 to 850 mW, 0.5 to 1.0
`s, and 38 to 115 spots (average, 71 spots).
`Confluent laser burns were made on the
`light-gray trabecular meshwork. The laser
`spot was moved circumferentially,
`in a
`"painting" fashion, during the burn. If no
`IOP elevation occurred within several
`months, the treatment was repeated.
`All eyes were examined weekly, when
`possible, with the use of
`intramuscular
`ketamine hydrochloride anesthesia. Tests
`included slit-lamp examination, IOP mea¬
`surement with a tonometer (Perkins), and
`optic disc photographs with a fundus cam¬
`era (Zeiss). The animals were killed at
`varying intervals to obtain representative
`samples for histopathologic determina¬
`tions.
`
`—
`
`Gonioscopic appearance of angle
`Fig 1.
`structures two months following laser photo-
`coagulation of trabecular meshwork. Irregular
`pigmentation of trabecular meshwork is noted,
`low peripheral anterior syne-
`with several
`chiae.
`
`RESULTS
`to the laser
`Prior
`treatment, no
`animal exhibited appreciable optic
`disc cupping. A small-diameter, shal¬
`low depression was sometimes noted
`in the center of the optic disc, measur¬
`ing less than 0.1 cup-disc ratio. All
`animals
`had
`IOPs
`pretreatment
`between 10 and 20 mm Hg.
`During the laser treatment, the tra¬
`becular meshwork would
`blanch
`markedly, with visible swelling and
`bubble formation. Because of the long
`duration of the laser burn, the area of
`blanching would expand onto the cili¬
`ary body band, which was more heavi¬
`ly pigmented than the trabecular
`meshwork. Immediately following the
`laser
`treatment, mild iridocyclitis
`developed in all eyes, with anterior
`chamber flare and cells (+1 on a scale
`of 1 to 4). The anterior chamber reac¬
`tion cleared within three to four
`weeks. Frequently the IOP fell
`for
`about one week. If the IOP subse¬
`quently rose, it occurred one to two
`
`Downloaded From: http://jamanetwork.com/pdfaccess.ashx?url=/data/journals/ophth/17954/ by a University of California - San Diego User on 05/09/2017
`
`Micro Labs Exhibit 1021
`
`

`

`Time, wk
`Fig 2.—Intraocular pressure of monkey eye 6, with disc photographs
`shown in Fig 4. Letters A through F correspond to Fig 4, A through F.
`Solid arrows indicate laser treatments.
`
`Time, wk
`Fig 3.—Intraocular pressure of monkey eye 13, with disc photographs
`shown in Fig 5. Letters A through F correspond to Fig 5, A through F.
`Solid arrows indicate laser treatments.
`
`Fig 4.—Disc photographs for monkey 6: A, pretreatment; , following laser treatment,
`reversal of cupping and loss of
`slight saucerization, and peripapillary shadow; C,
`peripapillary shadow; D, minimal increase in cupping; E, more cupping; F, more extensive
`cupping, with nerve fiber layer thinning inferiorly.
`prolonged pressure elevation. This
`weeks following the laser treatment.
`condition was not due to stretching of
`Gonioscopic examination after laser
`the iris by peripheral anterior syne-
`treatment in all eyes revealed an open
`angle, with indistinct angle struc¬
`chiae. Corneal edema developed dur¬
`tures, pigment mottling of the trabec¬
`ing periods of extremely high IOP,
`occasionally interfering with ade¬
`ular meshwork, and scattered,
`low,
`tentlike peripheral anterior synechiae
`quate optic disc photographs. Since
`(to ciliary body or scierai spur) (Fig
`the upper limit of IOP measurement
`1). More than one laser treatment was
`with the tonometer we used is 50 mm
`Hg, IOPs above that level were desig¬
`usually required to produce a perma¬
`nent IOP rise. The IOP rise was rapid,
`nated as greater than 50 mm Hg. The
`followed by alternating periods of
`mean fluctuation in IOP (highest
`normal and elevated IOP (Figs 2
`recorded IOP to lowest) was 41 mm
`and 3).
`Hg.
`Progression of optic disc cupping
`Fixed mydriasis, with absent light
`reflex, occurred in all eyes following
`only occurred following IOP eleva-
`
`tions above 39 mm Hg. One eye
`showed no cupping, but had a maxi¬
`mum IOP of 37 mm Hg, with a total of
`only four weeks of IOP above 30 mm
`Hg. Cupping in the other 14 eyes
`typically began as conical or funnel-
`shaped
`the change
`saucerization,
`being best detected with stereoscopic
`viewing. Posterior bowing of the optic
`nerve head and peripapillary region
`was noted in 11 of 15 eyes. A peripap¬
`illary "shadow," detectable without
`stereoscopic viewing, was observed in
`those eyes; it was due to an increase in
`posterior sloping of the peripapillary
`region (Fig 4, B). With normalization
`
`Downloaded From: http://jamanetwork.com/pdfaccess.ashx?url=/data/journals/ophth/17954/ by a University of California - San Diego User on 05/09/2017
`
`Micro Labs Exhibit 1021-2
`
`

`

`Fig 5.—Disc photographs for monkey 13: A, pretreatment; , following laser treatment, moderate
`saucerization; C, early nerve fiber layer defect inferiorly; D, increased cupping and nerve fiber layer
`defect; E, cup extends to rim inferiorly; F, virtually total cupping, with undermining of rim and
`development of collateral vessel
`in base of cup.
`
`Clinical Features of Monkey Eyes After Sustained Elevation of Intraocular Pressure*
`
`Eye
`
`Saucer¬
`ization
`
`Reversal
`of
`Cupping
`
`Nerve Fiber
`Layer Defect
`
`Peripapillary
`Shadow
`
`Duration of
`Experiment, mo
`
`No. of
`Laser
`Treatments
`
`15
`15
`10
`
`10
`
`10
`
`13
`14
`
`12
`
`Total
`Mean
`'Plus indicates noted; minus, not noted.
`
`IOP Needed
`for Cupping,
`mm Hg
`
`Final Vertical
`Cup-Disc
`Ratio
`0.0
`
`50
`
`39
`43
`
`47
`50
`
`0.5
`
`0.8
`0.8
`0.8
`0.9
`
`1.0
`1.0
`1.0
`
`Total
`Energy,
`Joules
`71
`65
`69
`
`110
`80
`137
`
`90
`
`81
`
`of IOP (which periodically occurred
`spontaneously), reversal of sauceriza¬
`tion was noted in eight of 15 eyes (Fig
`4, C). After the initial phases of cup¬
`ping, a gradual increase in sauceriza¬
`tion of the optic nerve head was noted,
`resulting in a deeper cup with steeper
`walls, and an increase in the area of
`pallor (Fig 4, E). The cup remained
`round during this phase, and definite
`vertical ovalization of the cup was not
`observed. Reversal of cupping did not
`
`occur during this stage of cupping.
`Nerve fiber layer defects were noted
`in four of 15 eyes (Figs 4 and 5). Those
`eyes in which nerve fiber layer defects
`developed had corresponding thinning
`of the rim tissue, resulting in a slight¬
`ly vertically oval cup. If the IOP eleva¬
`tion remained extremely high for a
`considerable time, total cupping with
`undermining of
`the rim ultimately
`occurred (Fig 5, F). No flame-shaped
`hemorrhages or notches of the neural
`
`rim were noted in any eye during the
`features are
`study. Other clinical
`summarized in the Table. The cup-
`disc ratio in the Table is the contour
`stereoscopic
`ratio, determined by
`viewing of optic disc photographs.
`Discernible enlargement of
`the
`globe was often noted following IOP
`elevation.
`Immediately following re¬
`moval of the eyes for histopathologic
`evaluation, the globe dimensions were
`measured. The mean (±SD) antero-
`
`Downloaded From: http://jamanetwork.com/pdfaccess.ashx?url=/data/journals/ophth/17954/ by a University of California - San Diego User on 05/09/2017
`
`Micro Labs Exhibit 1021-3
`
`

`

`posterior dimension of ten globes was
`20.7 ± 1.1 mm and the horizontal
`dimension was 20.2 ± 0.9 mm. Com¬
`parable dimensions of six normal
`monkey eyes were 18.8 ± 1.2 and
`17.8 ± 0.3 mm, respectively.
`COMMENT
`Although several reports have out¬
`creating
`lined the technique for
`laser-induced primate glaucoma,
`to
`our knowledge the clinical
`features
`have not previously been detailed.24
`Primate glaucoma differs from hu¬
`man open-angle glaucoma in several
`respects. Although the angle is open
`in primate glaucoma, scattered,
`low,
`synechiae are
`peripheral anterior
`present. They do not extend over the
`trabecular meshwork and may be due
`to postlaser iridocyclitis from absorp¬
`laser energy by the darkly
`tion of
`pigmented ciliary body. Fixed mydria¬
`sis, noted in all eyes, may also be due
`to laser-induced damage of ciliary
`nerves that pass through the ciliary
`body and innervate the iris sphinc¬
`ter.
`Another difference between human
`and primate glaucoma is the variabil¬
`the IOP. Although a direct
`ity of
`comparison
`statistical
`be
`cannot
`made, the IOP fluctuation in primate
`glaucomas (41 mm Hg) is greater than
`in untreated human primary open-
`
`angle glaucoma, which has an average
`IOP fluctuation of about 15 mm Hg.5
`The IOP fluctuation in untreated
`human secondary open-angle glauco¬
`ma is unknown but would offer a more
`direct comparison.
`In the early phases of cupping in
`laser-induced primate glaucoma, pos¬
`terior bowing of the optic nerve head
`and peripapillary tissues was fre¬
`quently observed. The posterior dis¬
`placement was of sufficient magni¬
`tude to produce a characteristic shad¬
`ow around the optic disc (Fig 4, B).
`Viewed stereoscopically, this feature
`was saucerization of the optic disc and
`surrounding tissues, creating a slop¬
`ing margin, visible as a shadow. Pre¬
`sumably the thin monkey
`sclera
`allows the entire region to stretch
`posteriorly. This characteristic is not
`observed in older patients with open-
`angle
`but
`glaucoma
`been
`has
`described in younger patients.6 In the
`early phases of glaucoma in the mon¬
`reversal of saucerization was
`key,
`observed during periods of lower IOP.
`This change is well described in infan¬
`tile glaucoma7 and has been noted in
`young adults.6 Additional similarities
`between infantile human glaucoma
`and primate glaucoma include en¬
`the globe and corneal
`largement of
`edema with markedly elevated IOP.
`Symmetrical expansion of the cup,
`
`References
`
`localized
`with later development of
`thinning of the disc rim tissue, has
`been noted in a longitudinal study of
`cupping in human adult glaucoma.8
`Similar observations were made in
`the
`the
`IOP
`study.
`If
`present
`remained elevated, a definite round
`cup would develop after the phase of
`saucerization. The rim tissue of the
`optic nerve head remained symmetri¬
`in most eyes, but in four monkey
`cal
`eyes localized thinning of the disc rim
`tissue developed in association with
`nerve fiber
`layer defects (Figs 4
`and 5).
`A follow-up study of patients with
`childhood glaucoma found visual field
`defects similar to those found in adult
`open-angle glaucoma.9 This finding
`suggests a similar mechanism of optic
`nerve damage in infantile and adult
`human glaucoma. Since primate glau¬
`coma resembles infantile human glau¬
`coma, by inference the primate model
`should be useful
`for studying the
`pathogenesis of cupping of both infan¬
`tile and adult human glaucoma.
`
`This study was supported in part by Public
`Health Service grant EY-03277.
`Technical help was provided by Carol Toris.
`Key Words.—Argon laser photocoagula-
`tion; experimental glaucoma;
`intraocular
`pressure; monkey eye; optic disc cupping.
`
`1. Wise JB, Witter SL: Argon laser therapy for
`open-angle glaucoma: A pilot study. Arch Oph-
`thalmol 1979;97:319-322.
`2. Gaasterland DE, Kupfer C: Experimental
`glaucoma in the rhesus monkey. Invest Ophthal-
`mol Vis Sci 1974;13:455-457.
`3. Quigley HA, Hohman RM: Laser energy
`levels for trabecular meshwork damage in the
`primate eye.
`Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1983;
`24:1305-1307.
`4. Gaasterland DE, Tanashima T, Kuwabara
`T: Axoplasmic flow during chronic experimental
`
`I. Light and electron microscopic
`glaucoma:
`studies of the monkey optic nervehead during
`development of glaucomatous cupping.
`Invest
`Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1978;17:838-846.
`5. Duke-Elder S, Jay B: Glaucoma and hypoto-
`ny, in Duke-Elder S (ed): System ofOphthalmolo-
`gy. London, Henry Kimpton, 1969, vol 2: Disease
`of the Lens and Vitreous, p 456.
`6. Pederson JE, Herschler J: Reversal of glau-
`comatous cupping in adults. Arch Ophthalmol
`1982;100:426-431.
`7. Shaffer RN, Hetherington J Jr: The glauco-
`
`matous disc in infants: A suggested hypothesis
`for disc cupping. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol
`Otolaryngol 1969;73:929-935.
`8. Pederson JE, Anderson DR: The mode of
`progressive disc cupping in ocular hypertension
`and glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1980;98:490-495.
`9. Robin AL, Quigley HA, Pollack IP, et al: An
`analysis of visual acuity, visual fields, and disk
`cupping in childhood glaucoma. Am JOphthalmol
`1979;88:847-858.
`
`Currently in Other AMA Journals
`ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY
`/5-Galactosidase and Neuraminidase Deficiency Associated With Angiokeratoma
`Corporis Diffusum
`Akira Ishibashi, MD; Ryoji Tsuboi, MD; Masayoshi Shinmei, MD (Arch Dermatol
`1984;120:1344-1346)
`
`Downloaded From: http://jamanetwork.com/pdfaccess.ashx?url=/data/journals/ophth/17954/ by a University of California - San Diego User on 05/09/2017
`
`Micro Labs Exhibit 1021-4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket