throbber
Drugs of the Future 1992, 17(8) : 691-704
`Copyright PRODS SCIENCE
`
`Correlates in Pharmacostructures
`
`Phenyl substituted prostaglandin analogs for glaucoma
`treatment
`
`Johan Stjernschantz and Bahram Resul
`Glaucoma Research Laboratories, Kabi Pharmacia
`Ophthalmics, S-75182 Uppsala, Sweden.
`
`CONTENTS
`
`Introduction
`General method for synthesis of phenyl substituted
`PGF2alpha analogues
`17-Phenyl substituted PGF2alpha analogues
`Structure-activity relationships of 17-phenyl substituted
`PGF2alpha- ie analogues
`Latanoprost - A new drug candidate for glaucoma
`treatment
`Preclinical studies
`Clinical studies
`Variation of length of phenyl substituted omega chain
`Structure-activity relationships
`Effects of substituents on the phenyl ring
`Structure-activity relationships
`Importance of ring structure on the omega chain
`Other phenyl substituted prostaglandin analogues
`Conclusions
`Acknowledgements
`References
`
`691
`
`692
`694
`
`694
`
`698
`698
`699
`700
`700
`701
`701
`701
`702
`702
`702
`702
`
`Introduction
`
`In the eye prostaglandins have generally been associated
`with inflammation. This misconception goes back to the late
`1960s and 1970s and was, to a large extent, due to studies
`designed to prove the inflammatory role of prostaglandins
`in the eye . One problem with these studies was that large
`quantities of prostaglandins were administered to the eye,
`and usually by direct injection . Another problem was that in
`many of the studies, rabbits were used as experimental ani-
`mals . The rabbit eye is prone to reacting to a variety of stimu-
`li with increased blood flow and disruption of the
`blood-aqueous barrier in the anterior uvea . This protective
`mechansim of the rabbit eye (1) is in sharp contrast to pri-
`mate and human eyes, which generally are much less sensi-
`tive to trauma . It is conceivable that endogenous prosta-
`glandins may play an important role in this protective
`mechanism of the rabbit eye .
`The first study to demonstrate a clear-cut reduction in in-
`traocular pressure (IOP) after topical administration of pros-
`taglandins was that of Camras et a!. (2) . In this study a bi-
`phasic response in IOP could be obtained with small doses
`
`of prostaglandins, e .g ., prostaglandin F2alphe, (PGF2alpha) 1
`(Scheme 1) ; first an increase and then a sustained de-
`crease . A topical dose of 5 mcg induced only a decrease in
`IOP (2) . Unfortunately, however, this study was performed
`in rabbits, a species exhibiting marked tachyphylaxis to
`prostaglandins, and is therefore not representative for the
`human and primate eye in which prostaglandins lower IOP
`by another mechanism of action . In subsequent studies it
`has been demonstrated that prostaglandins indeed reduce
`IOP in primates and cats as well as in dogs (3-10) .
`The most relevant animal model with respect to the hu-
`man eye is the monkey eye and mechanism studies per-
`formed with prostaglandins in monkeys will therefore be de-
`scribed . Several independent studies clearly indicate that
`the main mechanism of action to reduce IOP, at least of
`PGF2alpha and its isopropyl ester, is increased uveoscleral
`outflow of aqueous humor (11-14) . Aqueous humor is pro-
`duced in the ciliary processes behind the iris . It then flows
`through the pupil from the posterior chamber into the ante-
`rior chamber between the iris and the cornea (Fig . 1) . Nor-
`mally, most of the aqueous humor exits the eye through the
`trabecular meshwork and Schlemm's canal situated in the
`chamber angle . Schlemm's canal is directly connected to
`episcleral veins outside the eye. However, part of the
`aqueous humor bypasses this exit route and leaves the eye
`through the so-called uveoscleral outflow pathway (15) . In
`this pathway aqueous humor percolates through the ciliary
`muscle from the anterior chamber to enter into the supraci-
`liary and suprachoroidal spaces from which the fluid rela-
`tively easily can pass out from the eye through the sclera
`(Fig . 1) . The main resistance in this pathway is constituted
`by the ciliary muscle .
`In glaucoma the drainage of aqueous humor from the an-
`terior chamber is obstructed in the trabecular meshwork
`and/or the tissue adjacent to Schlemm's canal . Thus, if part
`of the fluid could be shunted out from the eye through anoth-
`er route this would be very attractive from a pathophysiolog-
`ical and clinical point of view. In fact, theoretically, since the
`pressure gradient forcing fluid into the uveoscleral outflow
`pathway is very small, if all aqueous humor were to exit the
`eye through this route an IOP close to the episcleral venous
`pressure would ensue . Such a pressure level, around 10
`mmHg, would be very desirable in glaucoma management .
`
`Micro Labs Exhibit 1015
`
`

`

`692
`
`Phenyl substituted PG analogs for glaucoma treatment
`
`Trabecular
`meshwork
`
`Ciliary
`processes
`
`Cornea
`
`Fig . 1 . Schematic picture of the anterior segment of the eye . The
`aqueous humor dynamics in the anterior segment determines the
`intraocular pressure together with the pressure in the blood ves-
`sels outside the eye . Aqueous humor is produced in the ciliary
`processes (1) . It flows through the pupil into the anterior chamber
`(2), through the trabecular meshwork into Schlemm's canal and
`out into the blood vessels on the surface of the eye (3) . Part of the
`aqueous humor exits through the uveoscleral pathway, traversing
`the ciliary muscle to enter into the supraciliary and suprachoroidal
`spaces, from where the fluid can leave the eye through the sclera
`(4 and 5, respectively) .
`
`PGF2alpha and PGF2alpha isopropyl ester (PGF2alphaie) 2
`(Scheme 1) have been shown effectively to reduce IOP both
`in normotensive healthy volunteers and in patients suffering
`from ocular hypertension or open angle glaucoma (16-23) .
`However, both PGF2alpha and PGF2alpha-ie cause pro-
`nounced local side effects when applied topically on the eye .
`A diester prodrug, 15-propionate-PGF2 al pha -ie, was not
`found to significantly improve the therapeutic index of
`PGF2alpha in the eye of human volunteers (24) . These side
`effects comprise superficial irritation, mostly experienced as
`a grittyness or foreign body sensation and conjunctival hy-
`peremia lasting for several hours (25) . Because of the side
`effects it has not been possible to develop PGF 2,lpha or an
`esterified prodrug of PGF2alpha to a useful drug for glaucoma
`treatment in spite of the very good IOP lowering effect of this
`prostaglandin . It should be stressed, however, that
`PGF2a ,p ,,a and PGF2e1ph,-ie have never been found to induce
`any intraocular side effects, and therefore from a clinical
`point of view, this class of drugs probably would be accept-
`able as long as the superficial ocular side effect profile Is im-
`proved.
`
`Attempts were made to reduce the local side effects of
`prostaglandins by a prodrug concept through esterification
`of different parts of the molecule . Esterification increases li-
`pophilicity of the molecule and thus the bioavailability in the
`eye . The sites of esterification of PGF2alpha used for the pro-
`drug concept are illustrated in Scheme 1 . These prodrugs
`of PGF2alpha were prepared in the early 1980s. Unfortunate-
`ly, the prod rugs did not significantly increase the therapeutic
`index of PGF2alpha in the eye . However, substituting part of
`the omega chain with a phenyl ring (Scheme 2) has been
`shown to change the pharmacological profile of PGF2alpha
`dramatically with respect to the side effects in the eye
`(26-29) .
`
`General method for synthesis of phenyl substituted
`PGF2alpha analogues
`
`The omega chains of the phenyl substituted PGF2alpha
`analogues were synthesized from the appropriate phospho-
`ranes (30-32) or phosphonates (33) as key reagents . Three
`general routes were utilized as outlined in Scheme 3 .
`The acyl triphenylphosphorane I (Scheme 3) was pre-
`pared by addition of an aryl halide to lithiotriphenyl phosphi-
`noacetonide (method A) or by reaction of methyl triphenyl-
`phosphonium bromide with aryl acid ester using potassium
`t. butoxide (method B) . The reactive dimethyl (2-oxoalkyl)
`phosphonates were prepared by reaction of aryl halide and
`dimethyl (2- oxopropyl) phosphonate in THF using n-BuLi
`(method C) . These precursors were prepared in 55-60%
`yield .
`The phenyl substituted PGF2alpha analogues were pre-
`pared from a commercially available bicyclic lactone (34,
`35) corresponding to formula III as outlined in Scheme 4 .
`The primary alcohol of lactone III was oxidized to aldehyde
`IV using dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and dicyclohexylcarbo-
`diimide (DCC) in the presence of anhydrous phosphoric
`acid in dimethoxyethylene (DME) (36-38) . The crude aide-
`hyde IV was reacted with the appropriate acyl phosphorane
`or acyl phosphonate I, II (Scheme 3) using a method de-
`scribed by Emmon-Horner (39,40) affording alpha, beta un-
`saturated ketone V. The resulting enone V was treated with
`lithium tri sec butylboro hydride (lithium selectride) (41) at
`-120°C/-130°C, furnishing 70-75% S isomer Vla over R iso-
`mer Vlb . Sodium borohydride and cerium chloride (41) were
`also used but with lower stereoselectivity . The isomers were
`separated by column chromatography on silica gel using tol-
`uene : AcOEt 2 :1 as eluent. The phenyl benzoyl group was
`removed by using powdered potassium carbonate in meth-
`anol to give an 80% yield of the diol . The product was puri-
`fied by column chromatography on silica gel using AcOEt as
`eluent . The diol was treated with diisobutyl aluminium hy-
`dride (DIBAL) (42) in dry THF at -78°C to afford lactol (triol)
`VII in 75-80% yield . The triol VII underwent Wittig reaction
`with 4-carboxy butyl triphenylphosphonium bromide and
`Kot.Bu in THF furnishing the phenyl PGF 2a acid VIII . This
`was further reacted without isolation with isopropyl iodide
`(Ipri) and DBU in acetone (43) to give the corresponding es-
`ter in about 50% yield . The 15-allylic alcohol of the phenyl
`PGF 2. Iph , ester IX was oxidized with 2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicya-
`nobenzoquinone (DDQ) (44, 45) in dioxane to give the
`
`Micro Labs Exhibit 1015-2
`
`
`
`

`

`Drugs Fut 1992, 17(8)
`
`693
`
`desired 15-keto phenyl PGF 2a,pha analogue X in about 80%
`yield .
`13,14-dihydro phenyl PGF 2awp,, a analogues were synthe-
`sized as outlined in Scheme 5 . The trans allylic double bond
`of compound VI was reduced under hydrogen atmosphere
`using pd-c as a catalyst in the presence of sodium nitrite (46)
`affording compound XI in quantitative yield . The product XI
`was isolated and reacted subsequently following a proce-
`
`dure described above to give the desired product XII
`(Schemes 4 and 5) . The 9,11 dihydroxyl groups of the phe-
`nyl PGF2aipha analogue XII were protected with benzene bo-
`ronic acid (47) to give 9,11-phenyl boronate, which was fur-
`ther
`reacted
`without isolation with
`pyridinium
`chlorochromate (PCC) adsorbed on alumina (48) in CH2 CI 2
`to give the 15-keto analogue XI II . This was treated with hy-
`drogen peroxide to deprotect the 9,11-phenyl boronate,
`
`Micro Labs Exhibit 1015-3
`
`

`

`694
`
`Phenyl substituted PG analogs for glaucoma treatment
`
`Scheme 3
`
`METHOD A
`
`P =CH000H2-(CH,)n
`3
`1
`
`METHOD C
`
`(CH3O)2PO-CHpCOCH3 + X(CH2)n
`
`1-NaH
`"
`2-n-BuLi
`
`(CHAIPO -CH2cOCH1(CH2)n
`11
`
`Dose (µg)
`
`Fig, 2 . Miotic effect of 17-phenyl substituted PGF20iphe ie analogues in cat eyes 3 hours after topical application (maximum effect) .
`PGF2aipha-ie included for comparison (n = 6) .
`
`Micro Labs Exhibit 1015-4
`
`
`

`

`Drugs Fut 1992, 17(8)
`
`695
`
`DCC, DMSO
`
`N,P04
`
`tr1PPB
`Iv
`
`1- K,CO,ikOH
`
`2- DIBAUTHF
`
`(CH,)n
`
`VI
`
`a RIrOH R2.--H
`b RI=H R2=OH
`
`acylphosphonate or
`acylphosphorane
`
`NiGH4, C80 61 14,0
`
`(CHZ)
`
`0
`
`(CH,)n
`
`VII
`
`Ph,P,CH{CHt,000N
`
`OH
`
`000 d oxana
`
`(CNyn
`
`R,
`
`IX
`
`a R1--OH R2=H
`
`b RI=H RUM
`
`X
`
`giving the desired product, the 15-keto phenyl PGF2a1pha
`analogue XIV in good yield .
`The analogues were identified with 13C and 1 H NMR and
`the purity was determined with HPLC . All analogues were
`used as isopropyl esters to enhance bioavailability in the
`eye .
`
`17-Phenyl substituted PGF2alpha analogues
`
`Structure-activity relationships of 17-phenyl substituted
`PGF2a pr,a-ie analogues
`
`The test compounds were administered topically on the
`eye in aqueous solution . All the 17-phenyl substituted
`PGF2alpha ie analogues (Scheme 2) exhibited marked and
`dose dependent miotic (pupillary constrictive) effect in the
`cat (Fig . 2) . The horizontal pupillary diameter of the exper-
`imental eye was compared with that of the contralateral con-
`trol eye treated with vehicle only. In fact, some of the phenyl
`substituted analogues such as compound 5 (Scheme 2)
`were more potent than PGF2alpha (administered as the iso-
`propyl ester),which is endogenous in the eye (Fig . 2) . These
`results seem to be in fairly good agreement with those of
`previously reported studies with 17-phenyl-1 8,19,20-trinor-
`prostaglandins in other biological systems (49) . In spite of
`
`the fact that PGF2aiphaie is very irritative in the cat eye, none
`of the phenyl substituted PGF2alpha-ie analogues caused
`any ocular irritation as judged from the behavior of the ani-
`mals as well as from the degree of lid closure after topical
`administration of the compunds (Table I) . The marked miotic
`effect of these compounds in combination with the total lack
`of irritative effect strongly suggests that substitution of part
`of the omega chain with an aromatic ring structure either
`causes conformational alteration in the molecule or im-
`poses a steric hindrance, which enables a discrimination
`between different prostaglandin receptor subtypes .
`The IOP reducing effect of the new phenyl substituted PG
`analogues was investigated in cynomolgus monkeys using
`pneumatonometry. The pneumatonometer was calibrated
`for IOP measurement in monkeys using the closed stopcock
`method (50) . Again the experimental eye was treated topi-
`cally with the test compound while the contralateral eye re-
`ceived the vehicle only. It has to be emphasized that the IOP
`of the normotensive cynomolgus monkey is usually low, of-
`ten around 10-14 mmHg, and consequently only pressure
`reductions of a few mmHg can be obtained . In spite of this,
`many of the analogues caused a clear-cut reduction in IOP
`(Fig . 3) . Particularly analogues 5, 8 and 11 were effective .
`These compounds were roughly equipotent with PGF 2e ie .
`Least reduction was caused by the 15-epimers with the
`
`Micro Labs Exhibit 1015-5
`
`
`

`

`696
`
`Phenyl substituted PG analogs for glaucoma treatment
`
`Table 1. Maximum irritative and hyperemic responses of 17-phe-
`nyl trinor PGF2a1pha -ie analogues . PGF2alp l a -ie is included for
`comparison. All compounds were applied topically. The dose in
`cats was 1 mcg and in rabbits 0 .5 mcg (n = 6; Mean +/- SEM) .
`
`Irritation in the
`cat eye
`(0-3)
`
`Ocular surface
`hyperemia in
`rabbits (0 - 4)
`
`2 .7+/-0.2
`
`0 .0+/-0.0
`
`0.0+/-0 .0
`
`0.04-0 .0
`
`0.0+/-0 .0
`
`0.04-0 .0
`
`0.04-0 .0
`
`0.0+/-0 .0
`
`2 .9+/-0 .2
`
`1 .54-0 .3
`
`1 .1+/-0 .3
`
`1 .4+/-0 .2+
`
`1 .3+/-0 .1*
`
`0 .7 +/- 0 .1"
`
`0 .3+/-0 .3+
`
`0 .6+/-0 .3
`
`Compound No.
`
`PGF2aIPha ie
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`a
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`"pose 1 .0 mcg; +n = 3 .
`
`15-OH group in the upward position 6, 9 and by the
`15-keto-17-phenyl-PGF2ep,,,a -ie analogues 7, 10 (Fig . 3) .
`
`The log P values of the test compounds were computed
`using PACO program V 2 :10 (Chemodata-Computer Che-
`mie GmbH) . Log P values of compounds 2 and 8 were deter-
`mined experimentally using octanol/phosphate buffer (pH
`7 .4) and were found consistently to be about 1 log unit small-
`er than the computed values, indicating that the computed
`values give a satisfactory approximation of the true log P
`value . As can be seen from Table II the differences in log P
`values between compounds 5 to 11 were too small to ac-
`count for significant differences in bioavailability, and thus
`the differences obtained in biologic activity in the eye must
`be considered to reflect the inherent properties of the ana-
`logues tested .
`Repeated administration of compound 11 in laser treated
`ocular hypertensive monkeys caused a sustained reduction
`in IOP throughout the treatment period (51) . Suprisingly,
`even if these analogues reduce IOP in monkeys they have
`very little effect on the IOP in cats (28) or rabbits (unpub-
`lished results) .
`The effects of the phenyl substituted prostaglandin ana-
`logues on the conjunctival blood vessels have been studied
`in the rabbit eye . Rabbits were treated topically on the eye
`with the prostaglandin analogues, and surface (mostly con-
`junctival and episcleral) hyperemia was documented by col-
`
`Micro Labs Exhibit 1015-6
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Drugs Fut 1992, 17(8)
`
`697
`
`PGF2a- 1e
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`***
`
`T
`
`**
`
`T
`
`***
`
`y
`
`EEmyM O
`
`.
`
`L<
`
`O VQ 6
`
`C
`
`CO O d
`
`Fig . 3 . Maximum intraocular pressure reducing effect of 1 mcg of 17-phenyl substituted PGF2aipha-ie analogues in conscious cynomolgus
`monkeys after topical application . PGF2aipha-ie included for comparison (n = 6 ; Mean +/- SEM) . 'p < 0 .05, • • p a 0 .01 and ***p < 0 .001 .
`
`Table ll: Calculated log P values of the test compounds .
`
`OH
`
`COOCH(CH.0 A
`
`Compound
`No .
`
`5,6
`7
`8, 9,11
`10
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`2
`
`X
`
`DS
`DB
`SB
`SB
`SB
`DB
`D8
`DB
`D8
`DB
`DB
`DB
`DB
`DB
`DB
`DB
`DB
`
`X ~ Y-(CH2)n
`
`Y
`
`C-OH
`C=O
`C-OH
`C=O
`C-OH
`C-OH
`C-OH
`C-OH
`C-OH
`C-OH
`C-OH
`C-OH
`C-OH
`C-OH
`C-OH
`C-OH
`C-OH
`PGF2a,,
`
`n
`
`2
`2
`2
`2
`0
`1
`3
`4
`5
`6
`9
`2
`2
`2
`2
`2
`2
`isopropyl ester
`
`R
`
`H
`H
`H
`H
`H
`H
`H
`H
`H
`H
`H
`2-CH3
`4-CH3
`3-OCH3
`4-OCH3
`4-CF3
`4-F
`
`Log P'
`
`5 .33
`5 .00
`5 .57
`4 .87
`4 .59
`4 .82
`5 .81
`6 .33
`6.85
`7.39
`9 .01
`5.64
`5 .68
`5.20
`5.18
`6.24
`5.39
`5.47
`
`*Log P was calculated with PACO program V 2 :10 (Chemodata-Computer Chemie GmbH) according to R .F. Rekker and C. Hansch. SB
`= Single Bond ; DB = Double bond .
`
`Micro Labs Exhibit 1015-7
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`698
`
`Phenyl substituted PG analogs for glaucoma treatment
`
`or photographs . The experimental eye received the test
`compound while the contralateral eye served as a control re-
`ceiving the vehicle only . The photographs were evaluated
`on an arbitrary scale from 0-4 . As can be seen in Table I, all
`phenyl substituted PGF2aIPhaie analogues (Scheme 2) in-
`duced clearly less hyperemia than PGF2a1pha-ie . The ana-
`logues exhibiting least conjunctival hyperemia were gener-
`allythose exhibiting least pharmacologic activity such as the
`earlier mentioned 15-OH epimers 6,9 and the 15-keto 7, 10
`17-phenyl substituted prostaglandin analogues (Table I) .
`
`Latanoprost - A new drug candidate for glaucoma
`treatment
`
`13,14-dihy-
`PhXA41 ;
`name :
`(code
`Latanoprost,
`dro-17-phenyl-18,19,20-trnor- PGF2aipha isopropyl ester ;
`Scheme 6) 8 is the pure 15R epimer of compound 11
`(PhXA34), which is a mixture of the 15R and 15S epimers
`in approximately equimolar proportion. Since the 15Sepim-
`er exerts similar biologic activity to the 15R epimer but is
`much weaker, exerting only about 10% of the activity of the
`15Repimer (29) several of the pharmacological and clinical
`studies with PhXA41 have been carried out using the epim-
`eric mixture (PhXA34) . In this context it is pertinent to men-
`
`Scheme 6
`
`OH
`
`/v `COOCH(CH3) 2
`
`OH
`
`OH
`
`LATANOPROST
`
`tion that the doses of PhXA34 used correspond roughly to
`50% of equivalent doses of PhXA41, The reason for using
`PhXA34 in these first studies was that this substance origi-
`nally was the drug candidate for a new prostaglandin based
`antiglaucoma drug .
`
`Preclinical studies
`
`Pharmacodynamic studies performed in monkeys have
`demonstrated that the main mechanism of action of latano-
`prost to reduce IOP is by increasing the uveoscleral outflow,
`and no or very little effect has been seen on the conventional
`outflow of aqueous humor through Schlemm's canal (14) .
`Of importance is that no negative, effect was seen on the
`aqueous humor production (14) . Thus, the reduction of IOP
`seen in primate eyes after topical administration of latano-
`prost is not due to a decrease in aqueous humor production,
`as is the case with beta-adrenergic antagonists .
`The effects of latanoprost on the ocular microcirculation
`have been carefully studied . Experiments performed with
`the radiolabelled microsphere technique (52) indicate that
`the acute effects of topically administered latanoprost in pri-
`mate eyes are very modest, and the only tissues in which a
`slight increase in blood flow could be detected were the an-
`terior portion of the sclera and the ciliary body (14) . In the
`same experiments the effect of latanoprost on capillary per-
`meability was also determined using 125 1 albumin, 13 '1 albu-
`min and 51 Cr labelled erythrocytes according to well estab-
`lished techniques (53, 54) . Topical administration of
`latanoprost in primate eyes had no effect on capillary per-
`meability in any of the ocular tissues (14) . Thus, these ex-
`periments show that latanoprost has negligible effects on
`the microcirculation in the eye . This is in contrast to
`PGF2alpha ie, which has been demonstrated to substantially
`increase the blood flow of the anterior segment upon topical
`application in monkeys (55) .
`The prostaglandin receptor profile of latanoprost has
`been worked out in vitro usirig a receptor classification sys-
`tem previously described (56) . In these experiments the free
`
`Table ill : EC-50 values of latanoprost 8 in different prostaglandin receptor systems compared with the specific ligands.
`
`Specific ligand
`
`Receptor
`
`FP
`
`EP,
`
`EP2
`
`EP,
`
`DP and IP
`
`TP
`
`Latanoprost EC-50
`(moles/I)
`
`3 .6 x 10 .9
`
`1 .1 x 10' 5
`
`3 .6 x 10 -
`
`1 .1 x 10-4
`
`3 .4 x 10-3
`
`>1 .0 x 10-3
`
`Substance
`
`PGF2aipha
`
`PGE 2
`
`PGE 2
`
`Sulprostone
`PGE 1
`
`BW245C
`PG12`
`
`U-46619"
`
`"Carbaprostacyclin used as stable ligand ; "Stable T,,A2 analogue.
`
`EC-50
`(moles/1)
`
`6 .7 x 10-s
`
`3 .3 x 10$
`
`1 .5 x 10'7
`
`1 .8 x 10 -10
`2 .5 x 10' 9
`
`4 .7 x 10-8
`4 .7 x 10' 9
`
`3 .1 x 10 -6
`
`Micro Labs Exhibit 1015-8
`
`

`

`Drugs Fut 1992, 17(8)
`
`Scheme 7
`
`699
`
`Name
`
`COMPOUND
`No
`
`15-PHENYL PGF
`16-PHENYL PGF
`17-PHENYL PGF
`18-PHENYL PGF
`19-PHENYL PGF
`20-PHENYL PGF
`20-METHYLENE-
`PHENYL PGF
`20-(4-PHENYL-
`BUTYL PGF
`
`1 3
`
`14
`1 5
`16
`
`0
`
`2
`
`4
`5
`6
`
`9
`
`'The compound was- used as 13,14-dihydro-15-phenyl-pentanor
`PGF2a-i9
`
`acid instead of the isopropyl ester has been used . Latano-
`prost has high affinity and selectivity for PGF2a,pha (FP) re-
`ceptors as demonstrated in Table 111 (57) . The affinity for
`EP2, EP3, DP, IP and TP receptors is very low compared
`with the specific ligands . However, the affinity for EP1 recep-
`tors is somewhat greater (57) . These results indicate that
`FP receptors most likely are important in the mechanism
`leading to increased uveoscleral outflow and reduced IOP
`in primate and human eyes . Even if the site of action prob-
`ably is the ciliary muscle and/or adjacent tissues, it is not ful-
`ly clear which cells mediate the effect .
`
`Clinical studies
`
`In the clinical studies published so far mostly PhXA34 11
`has been used . It should be recalled that PhXA34 contains
`about 50% PhXA41 . Several Phase II clinical trials are pres-
`ently in progress with latanoprost . In a first Phase I study the
`ocular effects of PhXA34 were investigated in healthy hu-
`man volunteers . PhXA34 was found to potently reduce IOP
`in a dose-dependent way with few side effects when applied
`topically on the eye (58) . The concentrations tested were
`0 .003%, 0 .01 % and 0 .03% . The only side effect observed
`was a conjunctival hyperemia which occurred with the high-
`est concentration and which was much less pronounced
`than that generally seen with PGF 2aip ha-ie . Repeated admin-
`istration of the highest concentration, once daily for a total
`of 7 days in healthy volunteers caused a sustained reduction
`
`in IOP throughout the treatment period (58) . There was no
`effect on the formation of aqueous humor as studied with
`fluorophotometry (58) .
`In a masked, placebo-controlled dose-finding study in pa-
`tients with ocular hypertension a dose of approximately 3
`mcg of PhXA34 per application corresponding to a concen-
`tration of 0 .01% was found to be close to optimal with re-
`spect to maximum IOP reduction and a minimum of con-
`junctival hyperemia (59) . This dose reduced IOP by an
`average of 30% from an initial pressure of around 25 mmHg
`without significant conjunctival hyperemia (59) . In another
`masked placebo-controlled study ocular hypertensive pa-
`tients were treated with 0 .003% and 0 .01 % PhXA34 twice
`daily for 6 days (60) . Both concentrations significantly re-
`duced IOP with few side effects. The maximum reduction in
`IOP with the higher concentration was 10 mmHg from an ini-
`tial pressure level of about 25 mmHg (60) .
`The longest duration of continuous treatment with latano-
`prost so far is 1 month (61) . In this recent masked, placebo
`controlled multicenter study it was shown that ocular hyper-
`tensive patients treated with latanoprost exhibited reduced
`IOP throughout the treatment period (61) . Thus, all clinical
`studies performed so far indicate that latanoprost (including
`PhXA34) effectively reduces IOP with markedly improved
`side effect profile compared to PGF 2a1 ,ha and its isopropyl
`ester. The duration of action of latanoprost in the eye is long,
`and a dose regimen of once a day application may be suffi-
`cient.
`
`Micro Labs Exhibit 1015-9
`
`∎
`

`

`700
`
`Phenyl substituted PG analogs for glaucoma treatment
`
`Variation of length of phenyl substituted omega chain
`
`As part of the structure-activity program in this
`project a series of phenyl substituted prostaglandin ana-
`logues with the omega chain length varying from 15-phenyl-
`pentanor-PGF2alPha ie to 20(4phenyl-butyl)-PGF2a 1p,,-ie
`(Scheme 7) were synthetized and investigated for biologic
`activity in the eye . The synthetic pathway of these com-
`pounds is outlined in Scheme 4 .
`
`Structure-activity relationships
`
`The purpose of these experiments was to study the influ-
`ence of omega chain length on the potency and specificity
`of the phenyl substituted PGF2a1Pha-ie analogues . The main
`emphasis has been on investigating general biologic activity
`and sensory irritative effect of the compounds . Thus, the cat
`eye has been used as a model, because exact measure-
`ments can be made on the miotic response reflecting gener-
`al biologic activity and the cat eye is a satisfactory model for
`the sensory irritative effect. It should be stressed that most
`of the phenyl substituted PGF2aIPha analogues, as pointed
`out earlier, have a poor IOP reducing effect in cats . Howev-
`er, the miotic effect in cats expressing a FP receptor function
`seems to correlate with the IOP reducing effect in primates
`and man . All analogues have been used as isopropyl esters
`and they have been administered topically on the eye .
`The miotic and irritative effects of a fixed dose (1 mcg) of
`phenyl substituted analogues of PGF2alpha-ie with an omega
`chain ranging from 3 to 12 carbon atoms (total number of
`carbons 15-24) (Scheme 7) are illustrated in Figure 4 . As
`can be seen, the position of the phenyl moiety in the omega
`chain is of fundamental importance for activity and selectiv-
`
`ity. The 17-phenyl substituted analogue was optimal be-
`cause this compound exhibited high biologic activity without
`irritating effect . Again differences in partition coefficient be-
`tween the compounds (Table II), and thus differences in
`bioavailability, cannot account for the striking differences in
`biologic activity. It can be seen that compounds 16, 17 and
`18 had higher log P values, but higher log P values reflect
`greater lipophilicity which usually enhances penetration into
`the eye . It should be observed that particularly the 16-phenyl
`13 but also the 18-,19-, 20-, and 20-methylene-phenyl ana-
`logues 14,15,16,17 exhibited irritation although significant-
`ly less than PGF2alpheie . Furthermore, it is noteworthy that
`the 16-phenyl analogue 13 of PGF2alPha-ie at a dose of 1 mcg
`exerted no miotic effect at all . Decreasing the chain length
`to the 15-phenyl-pentanor analogue 12 resulted in loss of
`biologic activity at the dose level tested as could be ex-
`pected and in general this compound is anticipated to have
`only weak activity. Elongation of the omega chain to the 20
`(4-phenyl-butyl)-PGF2a,pha-ie analogue 18 also resulted in
`loss of biologic activity in the eye, whereas the 20-methy-
`lene-phenyl analogue 17 exerted some biologic activity .
`These results indicate that the 17-phenyl-18,19,20-tri-
`nor- PGF2aIPha-ie is unique in that this compound exhibits a
`structural conformation with no affinity for PG receptors in-
`volved in the sensory irritative response (presumably PG .re-
`ceptors on sensory nerves), while retaining the affinity for
`FP receptors as demonstrated by the miotic response . In
`contrast, PGF2alpheie analogues with shorter or longer phe-
`nyl substituted omega chain did show some affinity for PG
`receptors mediating nociceptive impulses . However, this af-
`finity was much weaker than that of PGF2 SIpha-ie . It appears
`that the steric hindrance of the phenyl ring and the inter-
`atomic distances between functional groups in the mole-
`cules are important for drug-receptor interaction .
`
`10-
`
`6-
`
`8-
`
`7-
`
`6-
`
`5-
`
`4-
`
`3-
`
`2-
`
`0-
`
`TZ
`
`I
`
`-3.0
`
`-"2 .0
`
`i
`i
`
`i
`
`i
`
`i
`
`-1 .0
`
`i
`
`a
`
`a
`
`w
`
`EE
`
`w
`
`mE
`
`m
`
`aC
`
`L
`
`S C
`
`0
`
`cc
`
`PGF2a-ie C-15
`
`C-16
`
`C-17
`
`C-18
`
`C-19
`
`C-20
`
`C-21
`
`Compund :
`
`12
`
`13
`
`5
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`C-24
`
`18
`
`Fig. 4. Miotic and irritative effects of phenyl substituted PGF2aIpha-ie analogues with different omega chain length . The compounds were
`administered topically on cat eyes and the dose was 1 mcg . The total number of carbon atoms in the analogues up to the phenyl ring is
`indicated below the abscissa. Empty columns indicate miosis and hatched columns ocular irritation . PGF2a1pt,a-ie included for comparison
`(n = 6 ; Mean +/- SEM) .
`
`Micro Labs Exhibit 1015-10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Drugs Fut 1992, 17(8)
`
`701
`
`Table IV.• Miotic and irritative effects in the cat eye of 17-phenyl
`trinor prostaglandin analogues substituted in the phenyl ring.
`The compounds have been compared with PGF2alpha -ie and
`compound 5. Reduction in pupil diameter was determined 3 h
`after treatment. Dose 1 mcg (n = 6; Mean +/- SEM).
`
`Compound No.
`
`PGF2a,phaie
`
`5
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`Reduction in pupil
`diameter
`(mm)
`
`-8.24-0.7
`
`-9 .74-03
`
`-8 .3 +/- 0 .6
`
`-2 .54-0 .2
`
`-1 .24-0-2
`
`0 .0+/-0.0
`
`-0 .54-0 .2
`
`-8 .24-0 .2
`
`Irritation
`(0-3)
`
`2 .7 +/- 0.2
`
`0 .04-0 .0
`
`0 .04-0 .0
`
`0 .0+1-0 .0
`
`0 .3+/-0 .0
`
`0 .0+/-0 .0
`
`0 .0+/-0 .0
`
`0 .04-0 .0
`
`Effects of substituents on the phenyl ring
`
`The biological effects of different substituents on the ben-
`zene ring of 17-phenyl-18,19,20-trinor-PGF2a, pha ie have
`also been studied . The miotic and irritative effects in the cat
`eye were investigated as described above . The compounds
`investigated are shown in Scheme 8, and the synthesis of
`the compounds is outlined in Scheme 4 .
`
`the irritative response . However, introduction of the methyl
`group into position 4 of the phenyl ring 20 markedly de-
`creased the miotic effect (Table IV), probably reflecting a re-
`duction of biologic activity based on steric hindrance .
`Introduction of a methoxy group into the phenyl ring has
`been used to study the effect of an electron donating group
`in the vicinty of the benzene ring . Introduction of a methoxy
`group in position 3 of the phenyl ring 21 or in position 4 of the
`phenyl ring 22 resulted in markedly reduced miotic effect or
`complete loss of the miotic effect in cats (Table IV) . Even ten
`times higher doses of compound 22 had very little miotic ef-
`fect in the cat .
`Introduction of a trifluoromethyl group into position 4 in the
`phenyl ring 23, as can be expected, rendered the 17-phenyl-
`trinor- PGF2a,phaie analogue practically inactive (Table IV) .
`Even in a dose of ten times that in Table IV very little miotic
`effect could be elicited. Introduction of electron donating or
`electron receiving groups such as methoxy and trifluoro-
`methyl, respectively, conceivably gives this part of the mole-
`cule an ionic character that leads to decreased activity .
`Introduction of fluorine into position 4 on the phenyl ring
`24 did not appreciably change biologic activity as judged
`from the miotic response (Table IV) . There was no irritating
`effect of this compound either.
`Again, as evident from Table 11, the differences in log P val-
`ues between the compounds were not big enough to ac-
`count for the significant differences in biologic activity be-
`tween the compounds . These experiments thus show that
`it is
`possible
`to
`alter
`the
`biologic
`activity
`of
`17-phenyl-18,19,10-trinor-PGF 2a ,ph aie by introducing cer-
`tain substituents on the phenyl ring .
`
`Structure-activity relationships
`
`The effect of introduction of a methyl group, methoxy
`group, trifluoromethyl group or fluorine into the phenyl ring
`on the structure-activity relationship has been studied . As
`evident from Table IV introdid[ion of a methyl group into po-
`sition 2 on the benzene ring 19 did not change the miotic or
`
`Importance of ring structure on the omega chain
`
`From what is mentioned above, it is evident that by substi-
`tuting part of the omega chain

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket