throbber
Experimental Eye Research 78 (2004) 767–776
`
`www.elsevier.com/locate/yexer
`
`Pharmacological characteristics of AFP-168 (tafluprost), a new prostanoid
`FP receptor agonist, as an ocular hypotensive drug
`
`Yasutaka Takagia, Tadashi Nakajimaa, Atsushi Shimazakia, Masaaki Kageyamaa,
`Takeshi Matsugia, Yasushi Matsumurab, B’Ann T. Gabeltc, Paul L. Kaufmanc, Hideaki Haraa,*
`
`aGlaucoma Group, Research and Development Center, Santen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, 8916-16, Takayama-cho, Ikoma 630-0101, Nara, Japan
`bFine Chemicals Group, Chemicals Company, Asahi Glass Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan
`cDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
`
`Received 9 July 2003; accepted in revised form 16 December 2003
`
`Abstract
`
`To evaluate the pharmacological characteristics of AFP-168 (tafluprost), a new prostaglandin (PG) F2a derivative, we examined its
`receptor-binding affinities, intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effect, effects on aqueous humor dynamics, and stimulating effect on
`melanogenesis. The receptor-binding profile for AFP-172, a carboxylic acid of AFP-168, was determined by measuring muscle contractions
`in an organ bath, inhibition of platelet aggregation, and competitive binding of a radio-labelled ligand. For the IOP-measurement study,
`ocular normotensive and laser-induced ocular hypertensive cynomolgus monkeys were used, and IOP was measured using a
`pneumatonograph. For the studies of aqueous humor dynamics, IOP (Goldmann applanation tonometry), fluorophotometry, two-level
`constant pressure perfusion, and isotope dilution and accumulation techniques were used in ocular normotensive monkeys. The melanin
`contents in the medium and in the cell bodies of cultured B16-F0 melanoma cells were measured. The affinity for the FP receptor shown by
`AFP-172 (Ki: 0·4 nM) was 12 times that of PhXA85 (Ki: 4·7 nM), a carboxylic acid of latanoprost. A single application of AFP-168 at
`0·0025% significantly lowered IOP in both ocular normotensive and hypertensive monkeys (3·1 and 11·8 mmHg, respectively, p , 0·01) and
`latanoprost at 0·005% significantly lowered IOP (2·1 mmHg, p , 0·01 and 9·5 mmHg, p ¼ 0·059; respectively). Once daily instillation of
`AFP-168 at 0·001, 0·0025, or 0·005% for 5 days in normotensive monkeys significantly reduced IOP not only for a few hours, but also at the
`drug-trough time 24 hr after application. Latanoprost at 0·005% also reduced IOP, but not at the drug-trough time. AFP-168 decreased IOP
`mainly by increasing uveoscleral outflow by 65% ðp , 0·05Þ and, as sometimes seen with other prostanoids, also increased total outflow
`facility (33% increase, p , 0·05). In cultured B16-F0 melanoma cells, AFP-172 (100 mM) did not stimulate melanogenesis, but PhXA85
`(100 mM) did. These findings indicate that AFP-168 has a high affinity for the prostanoid FP receptor, has potent IOP-lowering effects in both
`ocular normotensive and hypertensive monkeys that exceed those of latanoprost, and has less stimulating effect on melanogenesis in
`melanoma cells.
`q 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
`
`Keywords: AFP-168; tafluprost; prostaglandin derivatives; FP agonist; receptor binding; intraocular pressure; aqueous humor dynamics; melanogenesis;
`cynomolgus monkey
`
`1. Introduction
`
`AFP-168 (tafluprost), 1-methylethyl (5Z)-7-[(1R,2R,
`3R,5S)-2-[(1E)-3,3-difluoro-4-phenoxy -1-butenyl]-3,5-
`dihydroxycyclopentyl]-5-heptenoate and AFP-172, a car-
`boxylic acid of AFP-168, are newly synthesized
`
`* Corresponding author. Dr Hideaki Hara, Glaucoma Group, Research
`and Development Center, Santen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, 8916-16,
`Takayama-cho, Ikoma 630-0101, Nara, Japan.
`E-mail address: hideaki.hara@santen.co.jp (H. Hara).
`
`0014-4835/$ - see front matter q 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
`DOI:10.1016/j.exer.2003.12.007
`
`prostaglandin (PG) F2a analogues (Fig. 1). AFP-168 is
`under development as an ocular hypotensive drug in the
`USA, Europe, and Japan. It is a pro-drug ester that facilitates
`corneal penetration and allows delivery of the active
`carboxylic acid form (AFP-172) to the aqueous humor, a
`similar situation to that seen with PGF2a-isopropyl ester and
`other ocular hypotensive derivatives of PGF2a, such as
`latanoprost.
`Glaucoma is a major cause of blindness worldwide, and
`many ocular hypotensive drugs are in existence. For over 20
`years, b-blockers such as timolol were the first-line therapy.
`
`IPR Page 1/10
`
`Santen/Asahi Glass Exhibit 2031
`Micro Labs v. Santen Pharm. and Asahi Glass
`IPR2017-01434
`
`

`

`768
`
`Y. Takagi et al. / Experimental Eye Research 78 (2004) 767–776
`
`unoprostone isopropyl, and PGF2a-isopropyl ester were
`purchased from Cayman Chemical Co. (Ann Arbor, MI,
`USA). Latanoprost ophthalmic solution (Xalatanw) was
`purchased from Pharmacia K. K. (Tokyo, Japan), pilocar-
`pine hydrochloride from Sigma-Aldrich Corp. (St Louis,
`MO, USA), and [3H] PGF2a (200 mCi/ml) from Amersham
`Biosciences Corp. (Piscataway, NJ, USA). [125I] and [131I]
`were obtained from PerkinElmer Life Sciences,
`Inc.
`(Boston, MA, USA). Timolol-gel forming ophthalmic
`solution (Timoptol-XEw) was a product of Santen Pharma-
`ceutical Co. Ltd (Osaka, Japan). PhXA85 and unoprostone
`(carboxylic acids of latanoprost and unoprostone isopropyl,
`respectively) were prepared at the laboratories of Santen
`Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. Because latanoprost, unoprostone
`isopropyl, and AFP-168 are pro-drug esters, and each is
`converted to its respective acid by the esterase in the cornea,
`the carboxylic acid forms were used in vitro, while the ester
`forms were used in vivo.
`
`2.2. Receptor-binding assays
`
`2.2.1. Prostanoid FP receptor
`For the prostanoid FP receptor-binding study, we used a
`clonal cell line that stably expresses the recombinant human
`prostanoid FP receptor (Abramovitz et al., 1994). The
`radioligand-binding assay was performed according to the
`methods of Abramovitz et al. (1994) and Graves et al. (1995).
`In this conventional filtration assay, membranes expressing
`the receptor are incubated with a fixed concentration of the
`radioligand and increasing concentrations of the test
`compounds. After reaching equilibrium, the radioligand
`bound to the membranes (bound) is separated from the
`unbound (free) radioligand by filtration through glass-fiber
`filters. The amount of bound radioactivity is determined by
`liquid scintillation spectrometry (LS5000TD; Beckman
`Coulter Inc., Fullerton, CA, USA), and the amount of
`bound radioactivity is plotted as a function of the logarithm
`of the concentration of the competing test compound.
`Increasing concentrations of the competing test compound
`decrease the binding of the radioligand according to the laws
`of mass action, and the affinity (IC50) of the test compound
`for the receptor can be determined by non-linear regression
`analysis according to
`B ¼ non-specific binding
`þ ðtotal binding 2 non-specific bindingÞ
`1 þ 10log½CŠ2logðIC50Þ
`
`where B equals the amount of radioligand-binding at a given
`concentration of test compound [C], total binding equals the
`amount of radioligand-binding in the absence of test
`compound, and non-specific binding equals the residual
`amount of radioligand-binding after complete displacement
`of specific binding by a saturating concentration of the test
`compound.
`
`Fig. 1. Chemical structures of AFP-168 and AFP-172.
`
`Then, after the discovery of the intraocular pressure (IOP)-
`lowering effects of PGs (Camras and Bito, 1981), several
`PG-derivatives such as isopropyl unoprostone (Taniguchi
`et al., 1996), latanoprost (Stjernschantz et al., 1995; Camras
`et al., 1996), bimatoprost (Woodward et al., 2001), and
`travoprost (Sharif et al., 1999; Hellberg et al., 2001) were
`launched into the market as anti-glaucoma drugs. The IOP-
`lowering effect of latanoprost has been found to be greater
`than that of timolol in a number of clinical comparative
`studies (Alm, 1995; Mishima et al., 1996; Watson et al.,
`1996; Alm et al., 2000). Recently, because of its potent IOP-
`lowering effects and fewer general side effects, latanoprost
`has been used as first-line therapy in many countries,
`including the USA and Japan.
`Prostanoid FP-receptor agonists have potent IOP-low-
`ering efficacy, and effectively no general side effects.
`However, PG-related ocular hypotensive drugs do have
`local side effects, such as pigmentation of the iris (Wistrand
`et al., 1997; Yamamoto and Kitazawa, 1997; Sherwood and
`Brandt, 2001; Netland et al., 2001), palpebra or/and
`periocular skin (Wand et al., 2001), and abnormal eyelash
`growth (trichiasis) (Johnstone, 1997). Furthermore,
`the
`existing PG-related ocular hypotensive drugs,
`including
`latanoprost, do not produce satisfactory IOP control in all
`patients. We therefore tried to find a new candidate as an
`ocular hypotensive drug that exceeds latanoprost in terms of
`IOP-lowering efficacy, and has weaker local side effects.
`In this study,
`in a comparison with latanoprost, we
`examined the binding affinity of AFP-172 for recombinant
`human prostanoid FP receptors, the binding selectivity of
`AFP-172, the IOP-lowering effects of AFP-168 in ocular
`normotensive and laser-induced ocular hypertensive mon-
`keys, the effects of AFP-168 on aqueous humor dynamics in
`ocular normotensive monkeys, and the effects of AFP-172
`on melanogenesis in cultured B16-F0 melanoma cells.
`
`2. Materials and methods
`
`2.1. Materials
`
`AFP-168 and AFP-172 were synthesized at the labora-
`tories of Asahi Glass Co. Ltd (Tokyo, Japan). Latanoprost,
`
`IPR Page 2/10
`
`

`

`Y. Takagi et al. / Experimental Eye Research 78 (2004) 767–776
`
`769
`
`2.2.2. Prostanoid DP, EP1, EP2, EP3, IP, and TP receptors
`Binding affinity for the prostanoid DP receptor was
`determined by measuring the inhibition of the adenosine
`diphosphate (ADP)-induced aggregation of rabbit platelets.
`Platelet-rich plasma was prepared from freshly obtained
`rabbit blood, and platelet aggregation was induced by 10 mM
`ADP (Eglen and Whiting, 1989). Binding affinities for the
`prostanoid EP1, EP2, and EP3 receptors were determined by
`measuring muscle contractions in an organ bath. The
`muscles, which were attached to an isometric transducer,
`were maintained at 378C in aerated (95% O2, 5% CO2)
`Krebs – Hensleit solution. For the prostanoid EP1 receptor,
`contraction of the guinea pig ileum was induced by 1 mM
`AFP-172 (Eglen and Whiting, 1989), and the contraction
`induced by AFP-172 was expressed as a percentage of the
`maximal response to 10 mM acetylcholine. For the prosta-
`noid EP2 receptor, contraction of the guinea pig trachea was
`induced by 1 mM carbachol, then inhibited by 1 mM AFP-
`172. For the prostanoid EP3 receptor, twitch contractions of
`the guinea pig vas deferens were induced by electrical
`stimulation (1 min interval, 5 sec trains of pulses at maximal
`voltage; pulse width, 1 msec; frequency, 5 Hz),
`then
`inhibited by AFP-172 (Savage et al., 1993). The binding
`studies for prostanoid IP and TP receptors were performed
`by a contract facility (Cerep, France) with standard binding
`procedures.
`
`2.2.3. Other receptors and transporters
`The binding studies for other receptors and transporters
`listed in Table 3 were performed by another contract facility
`(Daiichikagaku Pure Chemicals Co. Ltd, Toukaimura,
`Japan) with standard binding procedures.
`
`2.3. IOP measurement
`
`For the studies on ocular normotensive monkeys, 10
`adult male cynomolgus monkeys, each weighing 4·7 – 7·4 kg
`(Keari Co. Ltd, Osaka, Japan), were used for the single-
`application experiment, and another 10 adult monkeys, each
`weighing 4·5 – 8·1 kg (Animal Care Co. Ltd, Tokyo, Japan),
`were used for a repeated-application study. Only animals
`with normal eyes (in terms of anterior chamber, angles, IOP,
`ocular media, and optic nerve heads) were included in these
`studies. For the ocular hypertensive monkey study, 12 adult
`cynomolgus monkeys, each weighing 5·2 – 8·1 kg (Keari Co.
`Ltd, Osaka, Japan), were used. Elevated IOP was produced
`in the monkeys according to a previous report (Lee et al.,
`1985), with a minor modification. Briefly, ocular hyperten-
`sion was induced in the left eye by photocoagulating the
`trabecular meshwork using an argon laser (Ultima 2000;
`Coherent-Japan, Tokyo, Japan), applying 150 burns around
`360 degrees twice with a 1-week interval. The present study
`was carried out more than 4 weeks after
`the last
`photocoagulation. If the IOP in the photocoagulated eye
`was not 5 mmHg greater than that in the non-photocoagu-
`lated fellow eye, the animal was not used for this study.
`
`Before we measured IOP, all monkeys were trained for
`restraint in a monkey chair (CL-4535; Primate Products,
`Miami, FL, USA) and for measurements of IOP. For IOP
`measurements, the monkey was kept in a sitting position in
`the monkey chair, and the IOP was measured with a
`pneumatonograph (Model Classic 30R; Soran Ophthalmic,
`Jacksonville, FL, USA) without any general anesthesia or
`sedation. For corneal anesthesia, 0·4% oxybuprocain
`solution (Santen Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd, Osaka, Japan)
`was topically applied prior to IOP measurement. Drugs
`(20 ml) were applied to one eye in each monkey, with the
`contralateral eye remaining untreated. In the normotensive
`monkey study (single application), IOP was measured just
`before and at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hr after drug application. In
`the normotensive monkey study (repeated application), IOP
`was measured just before and at 4, 6, 8, and 24 hr on days 1,
`3, and 5 of the drug-application protocol. In the ocular
`hypertensive monkey study, drugs (20 ml) were applied to
`the left eye with elevated IOP in each monkey, at 9 – 10 a.m.
`IOP was measured just before and at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hr
`after drug application. A masked observer (F. N.) measured
`IOP in all experiments. A crossover design was applied to
`these studies; each animal contributed to all groups.
`Prior to aqueous humor dynamics studies, IOP responses
`to AFP-168 (4 £ 5 ml of 0·005%), timolol (2 ml containing
`5 mg timolol) and PGF2a-isopropyl ester (2 £ 5 ml of
`
`0·02%) were confirmed in monkeys anaesthetized with
`ketamine HCl (10 mg kg21, i.m.) using a minified Gold-
`mann applanation tonometer (Kaufman and Davis, 1980).
`
`2.4. Aqueous humor dynamics assays
`
`For the aqueous humor dynamics study, we used a total
`of 28 adult male and female cynomolgus monkeys, each
`weighing 2·5 – 6·0 kg (the majority from Covance Inc.,
`Madison, WI, USA; two from the Coulston Foundation,
`Almagordo, NM, USA; one born at
`the University of
`Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA). Aqueous humor formation
`(AHF) was measured in eight monkeys (i.m. ketamine
`anesthesia, 10 mg kg21 initial supplemented by 5 mg kg21
`as needed) by fluorophotometry (Gabelt et al., 1994); total
`outflow facility was measured in the same eight monkeys
`plus four additional ones (i.m. ketamine (10 mg kg21)
`(15 mg kg21
`followed by i.v. pentobarbital
`initial,
`supplemented with 5 – 10 mg kg21 as needed)) using two-
`level constant pressure perfusion (Ba´ra´ny, 1964; Gabelt
`et al., 1991); uveoscleral outflow and trabecular outflow
`were measured in the same 12 monkeys by means of isotope
`accumulation (Sperber and Bill, 1984; Gabelt et al., 2003)
`prior to outflow facility measurements on the same day.
`Only animals with normal eyes (in terms of anterior
`chamber, angles, IOP, ocular media, and optic nerve
`heads) were used. In these studies, 4 £ 5 ml of 0·005%
`AFP-168 was applied once daily for 3 – 5 days; 5 mg
`timolol (2 ml of timolol-gel forming solution diluted with
`saline) was applied once daily for 3 days; 2 £ 5 ml of 0·02%
`
`IPR Page 3/10
`
`

`

`770
`
`Y. Takagi et al. / Experimental Eye Research 78 (2004) 767–776
`
`PGF2a-isopropyl ester was applied twice daily for 4 or 5
`days to eight monkeys different from the previous 12;
`100 mg/10 ml pilocarpine HCl was applied intracamerally to
`yet another group of eight different monkeys.
`The rate of AHF was determined in ketamine anaes-
`thetized monkeys using a Coherent scanning ocular
`fluorophotometer (Fluorotron Master, Palo Alto, CA,
`USA). Fluorescein (10% fluorescite for injection, Alcon
`Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX, USA) was administered
`topically on the afternoon preceding the fluorophotometry
`experiments (usually five 2 ml drops of 5% solution diluted
`with 0·1 M sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7·4) 5 min after
`one drop of 0·5% proparacaine hydrochloride (Bausch and
`Lomb Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tampa, FL, USA). This kept
`the corneal fluorescein concentration at 200 ng ml21 or
`more during the measurement period. On the experimental
`day, scans were recorded in each eye every hour for 5 hr.
`Isotopic determination of AHF was performed in
`pentobarbital anaesthetized monkeys beginning 3 hr after
`the last dose of AFP-168 (fourth or fifth dose of once daily
`treatments) or PGF2a-isopropyl ester (seventh or ninth dose
`twice daily treatments) by circulating [125I] or
`of
`[131I]monkey albumin through the anterior chamber and
`measuring the dilution of label with newly formed aqueous
`(by counting a portion of the circuit every 5 min over a 2 hr
`period in a well detector/multichannel analyzer system,
`(ASA-100 NaI multichannel analyzer, Genie-2000 Spec-
`troscopy Software, Canberra Industries, Inc., Meriden, CT,
`USA). Flow through the trabecular meshwork was deter-
`mined by taking blood samples every 10 min from a femoral
`artery and counting them in a gamma counter (COBRA
`model D5003, Packard Instrument Co., Downers Grove, IL,
`USA). Uveoscleral outflow was calculated as the difference
`between AHF and trabecular outflow.
`Total outflow facility was determined in pentobarbital
`anaesthetized monkeys by two-level constant pressure
`perfusion of the anterior chamber with Ba´ra´ny’s mock
`aqueous humor, correcting for the internal resistance of the
`perfusion apparatus as appropriate (Ba´ra´ny, 1964). For
`AFP-168 and PGF2a-isopropyl ester studies, total outflow
`facility was determined for approximately 45 min at the
`conclusion of isotope studies and were completed within
`hours 5 – 6 after the fourth or fifth dose of once daily
`treatments with AFP-168 or after the seventh or ninth dose
`of twice daily treatments with PGF2a-isopropyl ester. For
`pilocarpine,
`the anterior chambers of both eyes were
`cannulated with a branched needle (with one branch
`connected to a reservoir and the other to a pressure
`transducer). Baseline facility measurements were taken for
`35 – 45 min. Following baseline measurements, a bolus
`injection of 10 ml containing 100 mg pilocarpine HCl was
`made into the inflow tubing of one eye, Ba´ra´ny’s into the
`opposite eye tubing. Following a 5-min wash in period
`with the reservoirs elevated, cold air was blown on the
`corneas to mix the anterior chamber contents by convection.
`Post-drug outflow facility was then determined for another
`
`35 – 45 min. Facility was calculated by successive averaging
`(Ba´ra´ny, 1964).
`
`2.5. Melanogenesis assay
`
`B16-F0 melanoma cells were purchased from Dainippon
`Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd (Osaka, Japan). Melanin contents
`were measured as in previous reports (Siegrist and Eberle,
`1986; Kosano et al., 1995). Briefly, fourth- or fifth-passage
`B16-F0 melanoma cells (ATCC No. CRL6322; 5 £ 103
`cells/well) were seeded in a 24-well plate (Asahi Techno
`Glass Corp., Funabashi, Japan) in culture medium (Dulbec-
`co’s modified Eagles medium containing 10% fetal bovine
`serum and 50 mg ml21 gentamicin). Starting the day after
`seeding,
`the cells were cultured for 4 days in culture
`medium with or without drug (AFP-172 or PhXA85).
`The culture medium was collected, and the cells dissolved
`in lysis buffer (0·1N NaOH solution containing 10% Triton
`X-100) with 10-sec sonication. The melanin content of the
`medium and cell lysates was measured by absorbance at 490
`and 415 nm, respectively.
`
`2.6. Statistical analysis
`
`The following statistical analyses were performed. For
`the IOP measurement study, the maximal reduction in IOP
`was used for statistical analysis. A Student’s t-test was
`carried out following an F-test. Dunnett’s test and the
`Tukey – Kramer test were carried out following a one-way
`analysis of variance. For the aqueous humor dynamics
`study, a two-tailed paired t-test was carried out on the values
`obtained for treated/control ratios. p , 0·05 was taken as
`statistically significant.
`
`3. Results
`
`3.1. Receptor-binding assays
`
`3.1.1. Prostanoid FP receptor
`Prior to the FP binding study, we confirmed the
`expression of prostanoid FP receptors in the clonal cells.
`Immunofluorescence microscopy using an anti-FP receptor
`antibody, examination of the accumulation of inositol
`phosphates induced by fluprostenol, and radioligand-bind-
`ing competition curve analysis of PGF2a to [3H]PGF2a
`revealed that the clonal cell line used in this study did
`indeed express human FP receptors (data not shown). AFP-
`172 showed a high affinity for the human prostanoid FP
`receptor, with an EC50 of 0·53 nM. The affinity of AFP-172
`was 12 times that of PhXA85 and 1700 times that of
`unoprostone (Table 1). AFP-172 produced full displacement
`of specific [3H]PGF2a binding and competed in a
`manner consistent with a simple bimolecular reaction
`(Hill slope , 1), as did PhXA85 and unoprostone.
`
`IPR Page 4/10
`
`

`

`Y. Takagi et al. / Experimental Eye Research 78 (2004) 767–776
`
`771
`
`Table 1
`Fifty percent inhibition concentration (IC50) and affinities of AFP-172,
`PhXA85, and unoprostone for the human prostanoid FP receptor
`
`Table 3
`Inhibitory effects of AFP-172 on various receptors and transporters
`
`Compounds
`
`IC50 (nM)
`
`AFP-172
`PhXA85
`Unoprostone
`
`0·53 ^ 0·18
`6·3 ^ 1·3
`900 ^ 55
`
`Ki
`(nM)
`
`0·4
`4·7
`680
`
`Potency ratio
`
`(Ki value of AFP-172 ¼ 1)
`
`1
`12
`1700
`
`Affinity for the prostanoid FP receptor was determined by competitive
`binding to radiolabelled prostaglandin F2a. The 50% inhibition concen-
`tration (IC50) and Ki values were calculated from the following equations:
`B ¼ non-specific binding þ ðtotal binding 2 non-specific bindingÞ
`1 þ 10log½CŠ2logðIC50Þ
`Ki ¼
`IC50
`1 þ ½radioligandŠ=Kd
`Data represent the mean ^ S.E.M. from far to five experiments; B; amount
`of radioligand binding; C; concentration of test compound; Ki; equilibrium
`inhibition constant; Kd; equilibrium dissociation constant.
`
`;
`
`;
`
`3.1.2. Prostanoid DP, EP1, EP2, EP3, IP, and TP receptors
`The inhibitory or stimulatory effects of AFP-172 on
`the binding or pharmacological responses of prostanoid
`receptors are shown in Table 2. AFP-172 at 1 mM did not show
`evidence of inhibitory or stimulatory effects on any receptor
`binding, except that of the prostanoid EP3 receptor. The IC50
`of AFP-172 for the prostanoid EP3 receptor was 67 nM, and
`the binding affinity of AFP-172 was 126 times weaker for this
`receptor than for the prostanoid FP receptor (see Tables 1 and
`2). PGD2 (DP), PGE2 (EP1), butaprost (EP2), 17-phenyl
`trinol-PGE2 (EP3), iloprost (IP) and U44069 (TP) were used
`as positive controls in each experiment.
`
`3.1.3. Other receptors and transporters
`As shown in Table 3, the inhibitory effects of AFP-172 at
`1 mM on a variety of receptor and transporter bindings were
`all less than 15%.
`
`Table 2
`functional activities of AFP-172 to
`Receptor-binding affinities or
`prostanoid DP, EP1, EP2, EP3, IP, and TP receptors
`
`Prostanoid receptors Assays
`
`EC50 or IC50 (nM)
`
`DP
`
`EP1
`
`EP2
`
`EP3
`
`IP
`
`TP
`
`Inhibition of ADP-induced
`aggregation in
`rabbit platelets
`Contraction in
`guinea pig ileum
`Inhibition of carbachol-induced
`contraction in guinea
`pig trachea muscle
`Inhibition of electrical
`stimulation-induced
`contraction in guinea
`pig vas deferens
`Inhibition of [3H]iloprost
`binding in human platelets
`Inhibition of [3H]SQ29548
`binding in human platelet
`
`.1000
`
`.1000
`
`.1000
`
`67
`
`.1000
`
`.1000
`
`Data are averaged from two or four experiments.
`
`Receptors/
`transporters
`
`Radioligand/assay
`
`Inhibition (%)
`(1 mM AFP-172)
`
`Adenosine A1
`Adenosine A2a
`Adrenergic a1
`(non-selective)
`Adrenergic a2
`(non-selective)
`Adrenergic b1
`Angiotensin AT1
`Benzodiazepine
`Bradykinin B2
`Cannabinoid CB1
`Cannabinoid CB2
`Cholecystokinin
`CCKA
`Dopamine D1
`Dopamine D2
`Dopamine
`transporter
`Endothelin ETA
`g-Aminobutyric
`acid (GABA)A
`Glutamate
`(non-selective)
`Histamine H1
`Melanocortin MC4
`
`Muscarinic
`(non-selective)
`Neurokinin NK1
`Neuropeptide Y1
`Neuropeptide Y2
`Norepinephrine
`transporter
`Nicotinic Ni
`Opiate
`(non-selective)
`Orphanin ORL1
`Serotonin 5HT1
`(non-selective)
`Serotonin
`transporter
`Sigma (s)
`Vasopressin V1b
`Vasopressin V2
`
`[3H]dipropylcyclopentylxanthine , 15
`[3H]CGS21680
`, 15
`[3H]Prazosin
`, 15
`
`[3H]RX821002
`
`[3H]CGP12177
`[125I]Angiotensin II
`[3H]Flunitrazepam
`[3H]Bradykinin
`[3H]CP55940
`[3H]WIN55212-2
`[3H]L-364718
`
`[3H]SCH23390
`[3H]Spiperone
`[3H]WIN35428
`
`[125I]Endothelin-1
`[3H]Flunitrazepam
`
`[3H]Glutamic acid
`
`[3H]Pyrilamine
`[3H]4-Norleucine,
`7-D-phenylalanine-a-
`melanocyte stimulating
`hormone
`[3H]Quinuclidinyl benzilate
`
`[3H]Substance P
`[125I]Peptide YY
`[125I]Peptide YY
`[3H]Nisoxetine
`
`[3H]Epibatidine
`[3H]Naloxone
`
`[3H]Nociceptin
`[3H]Serotonin
`
`[3H]Imipramine
`
`[3H]1,3,-Di-o-tolylguanidine
`[3H]Arg-Vasopressin
`[3H]Arg-Vasopressin
`
`, 15
`
`, 15
`, 15
`, 15
`, 15
`, 15
`, 15
`, 15
`
`, 15
`, 15
`, 15
`
`, 15
`, 15
`
`, 15
`
`, 15
`, 15
`
`, 15
`
`, 15
`, 15
`, 15
`, 15
`
`, 15
`, 15
`
`, 15
`, 15
`
`, 15
`
`, 15
`, 15
`, 15
`
`Data are averaged from two experiments.
`
`3.2. Effects of a single application of AFP-168 on
`intraocular pressure in conscious normotensive monkeys
`
`Fig. 2 shows the maximum IOP reductions of a single
`application of either AFP-168 or latanoprost in conscious
`ocular normotensive monkeys. The maximal IOP reductions
`with AFP-168 (0·00002 – 0·0025%) were dose-dependent,
`and significance was reached at doses of 0·0005 and
`0·0025%. The maximal IOP reduction seen with AFP-168
`
`IPR Page 5/10
`
`

`

`772
`
`Y. Takagi et al. / Experimental Eye Research 78 (2004) 767–776
`
`in Fig. 3), AFP-168 at 0·0025 and 0·005% did significantly
`reduce IOP at each trough time-point from 0 hr on day 3
`(24 hr on day 2) through 0 hr on day 6 (24 hr on day 5). Even
`with AFP-168 at 0·001%, an IOP reduction at the trough
`time-point was observed after 0 hr on day 3 (24 hr on day 2),
`and this effect was significant on and after 0 hr on day 4
`(24 hr on day 3). Fig. 4 shows the daily maximal IOP
`reductions induced by AFP-168 and latanoprost. The daily
`maximal reductions induced by all doses of AFP-168 and
`latanoprost increased after day 1, but statistically significant
`increases vs. day 1 were observed only with AFP-168 at
`0·0025 and 0·005%. The maximal IOP reductions achieved
`with AFP-168 at 0·0025 (mean ^ S.E.M.: 4·7 ^ 0·2 and
`5·0 ^ 0·2 mmHg at day 3 and 5, respectively, n ¼ 10) and
`0·005% (6·1 ^ 0·2 and 5·8 ^ 0·3 mmHg at days 3 and 5,
`respectively, n ¼ 10) were greater than that achieved with
`latanoprost at 0·005% (4·2 ^ 0·3 and 4·2 ^ 0·4 mmHg at
`day 3 and 5, respectively, n ¼ 10).
`
`3.4. Effects of a single application of AFP-168 on
`intraocular pressure in conscious laser-induced ocular
`hypertensive monkeys
`
`Fig. 5 shows the maximal IOP reductions induced by
`applications of AFP-168 and latanoprost in laser-induced
`ocular hypertensive monkeys. The mean IOP values at the
`pre-treatment time in all groups were in the range 35·8 –
`38·7 mmHg, and there was no statistically significant
`difference among the groups. AFP-168 (0·00002 –
`0·0025%) induced a dose-dependent IOP reduction, the
`maximal reduction at 0·0025 and 0·005% (11·8 and
`10·5 mmHg, respectively,) being statistically significant
`compared to that in the vehicle-treated eye (6·2 mmHg).
`The effect of AFP-168 on laser-induced ocular hypertension
`seemed to peak at 0·0025%,
`then almost plateau. The
`maximal IOP reduction (9·5 mmHg) seen after application
`of latanoprost tended to be greater than that in the vehicle-
`treated eye, but with borderline significance ðp ¼ 0·057Þ·
`
`Fig. 2. Effects of a single application of AFP-168 or latanoprost (maximal
`reduction in intraocular pressure (IOP)) in conscious ocular normotensive
`monkeys. Data represent the mean ^ S.E.M. for 12 animals. **p , 0·01 vs.
`vehicle (Tukey– Kramer test).
`
`at 0·0025% was over 3 mmHg, greater than that induced by
`latanoprost at 0·005% (which was approximately 2 mmHg,
`statistically significant compared to that in the vehicle-
`treated eye). The potency of AFP-168 at 0·0005% was
`almost equal to that of latanoprost at 0·005%.
`
`3.3. Effects of repeated applications of AFP-168 on
`intraocular pressure in conscious normotensive monkeys
`
`Fig. 3 shows time – course data for the effects of repeated
`applications of AFP-168 or latanoprost on IOP in ocular
`normotensive monkeys. Mean IOP values at
`the pre-
`treatment time in all groups were within a narrow range
`(21·5 – 22·1 mmHg), and there was no statistically signifi-
`cant difference among the groups. All doses of AFP-168
`reduced IOP at 4, 6, and 8 hr after their application on days
`1, 3, and 5. Latanoprost at 0·005% caused significant IOP
`reductions at 4, 6, and 8 hr after its application on days 1, 3,
`and 5. While latanoprost did not reduce IOP at the trough
`time-point (24 hr after its application; i.e. 0 hr on days 2 – 6
`
`Fig. 3. Effects of once daily application of AFP-168 or latanoprost on intraocular pressure (IOP) in conscious ocular normotensive monkeys. IOP change was
`calculated from time 0 on day 1. Drugs were instilled at 10:30 a.m. on each day from day 1 to day 5. Data represent the mean ^ S.E.M. for 10 animals.
`*p , 0·05; **p , 0·01 vs. vehicle (Dunnett’s multiple-range test).
`
`IPR Page 6/10
`
`

`

`Y. Takagi et al. / Experimental Eye Research 78 (2004) 767–776
`
`773
`
`uveoscleral outflow (Fu) by 65%. In this experiment, the
`FTB value is assumed to represent outflow through the
`trabecular meshwork (conventional outflow).
`Twice daily application of PGF2a-isopropyl ester at
`0·02% for 4 or 5 days did not affect AHF, but significantly
`decreased FTB by 59% and tended to increase Fu (although
`not significantly due to variability in the data).
`Once daily application of AFP-168 at 0·005% for 4 or 5
`days significantly increased total outflow facility by 33%
`compared to contralateral control eyes, but twice daily
`application of PGF2a-isopropyl ester at 0·02% for 4 or 5
`days did not. However, the control eye values in AFP-168
`animals tended to be lower than those of the control eyes for
`PGF2a-isopropyl ester and pilocarpine; the absolute facility
`values for AFP-168-treated and PGF2a-isopropyl ester-
`treated eyes were almost exactly the same. Intracameral
`application of pilocarpine significantly increased total
`outflow facility by 184%.
`
`3.6. Effect of AFP-168 on melanogenesis in B16-F0
`melanoma cells
`
`Fig. 6 shows the effects of AFP-168 and latanoprost on
`melanogenesis in cultured B16-F0 melanoma cells. In these
`cells, a-melanocyte stimulating hormone increased the
`melanin content in both the culture medium and cell bodies
`(data not shown). AFP-172 at 1 – 100 mM and PhXA85 at 1
`and 10 mM did not increase the melanin content in either the
`culture medium or cell bodies. PhXA85 at 100 mM
`significantly increased the melanin content above that
`seen with vehicle.
`
`4. Discussion
`
`AFP-172, a carboxylic acid of AFP-168, showed a potent
`affinity for the prostanoid FP receptor, and its affinity was
`greater than that of either PhXA85, a carboxylic acid of
`latanoprost, or unoprostone. The binding affinity of AFP-
`172 was 126 times higher for the prostanoid FP receptor
`than for EP3 receptor. On the other hand, AFP-172 showed
`no or less affinity for other prostanoid receptors (DP, EP1,
`EP2, IP and TP) and other receptors and transporters. AFP-
`172 also contracted the isolated cat iris sphincter muscle and
`its efficacy was greater than that of PhXA85 (Nakajima
`et al., 2003). These findings indicate that the binding profile
`of AFP-172, like that of PhXA85, is that of a selective
`agonist for the prostanoid FP receptor (Stjernschantz et al.,
`1995). Since the structural characteristics of AFP-168 and
`AFP-172 involve two fluorine atoms in position 15 in the b-
`chain of the prostaglandin structure, its fluorine atoms may
`bestow a more potent affinity for the prostanoid FP receptor
`than that exhibited by other PG derivatives.
`We demonstrated ocular hypotensive effects of AFP-168
`in ocular normotensive
`and laser-induced ocular
`hypertensive monkeys. A single application of AFP-168
`
`Fig. 4. Effects of a once daily application of AFP-168 or latanoprost
`(maximal reduction in intraocular pressure (IOP)) in conscious ocular
`normotensive monkeys. Drugs were instilled at 10:30 a.m. on each day
`from day 1 to day 5. Data represent the mean ^ S.E.M. for 10 animals.
`*p , 0·05 vs. day 1 (Dunnett’s multiple-range test).
`
`The reduced IOP had returned almost to the initial value at
`24 hr after drug application.
`
`3.5. Effect of AFP-168 on aqueous humor dynamics in
`anaesthetized ocular normotensive monkeys
`
`timolol-gel
`Table 4 shows the effects of AFP-168,
`forming solution, PGF2a-isopropyl ester, and pilocarpine on
`each parameter relating to aqueous humor dynamics in
`ocular normotensive monkeys.
`By fluorophotometry, once daily application of AFP-168
`at 0·005% for 3 days did not affect AHF. On the other hand,
`once daily application of timolol for 3 days significantly
`decreased AHF

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket