throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`Paper No. 24
`July 20, 2018
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`
`UNIFIED PATENT INC.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`PLECTRUM LLC,
`Patent Owner
`____________
`
`IPR2017-01430
`Patent 5,978,951
`____________
`
`
`Before KEN B. BARRETT, MIRIAM L. QUINN, and
`SHEILA F. McSHANE, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`McSHANE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`DECISION
`Patent Owner’s Unopposed Motion for
`Pro Hac Vice Admission of C. Ryan Pinckney
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01430
`Patent 5,978,951
`
`
`
`I. INTRODUCTION
`
`Plectrum LLC (“Patent Owner”), filed a Motion for Pro Hac Vice
`
`Admission of C. Ryan Pinckney in this proceeding. Paper 22 (“Mot.”). A
`
`supporting Declaration has also been filed. Ex. 2006 (“Decl.”). Patent
`
`Owner represents that Petitioner, Unified Patent Inc., does not oppose the
`
`grant of this motion. Mot. 1. For the reasons provided below, Patent
`
`Owner’s Motion is granted.
`
`II. DISCUSSION
`
`In accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), we may recognize counsel
`
`pro hac vice during a proceeding upon a showing of good cause, subject to
`
`the condition that lead counsel be a registered practitioner. The
`
`representative Order authorizing motions for pro hac vice admission requires
`
`a statement of facts showing there is good cause for us to recognize counsel
`
`pro hac vice, and an affidavit or declaration of the individual seeking to
`
`appear. See Paper 4, 2 (citing Unified Patents, Inc. v. Parallel Iron, LLC,
`
`Case IPR2013-00639 (PTAB Oct. 15, 2013) (Paper 7) (representative
`
`“Order – Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission”)).
`
`Patent Owner asserts that there is good cause for us to recognize Mr.
`
`Pinckney pro hac vice in this proceeding. Mot. 3. Patent Owner’s
`
`assertions in this regard are supported by the Declaration of Mr. Pinckney.
`
`Decl. 1–2.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case IPR2017-01255 (Patent 8,798,593 B2)
`Case IPR2017-01264 (Patent 8,798,647 B1)
`
`
`Mr. Pinckney declares that he is a member in good standing of the bar
`
`of Texas and the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Decl.
`
`1. Mr. Pinckney also declares that he is familiar with the subject matter at
`
`issue in this proceeding. Id. at 2. In addition, the facts alleged in Mr.
`
`Pinckney’s Declaration comply with the requirements set forth in our
`
`representative Order authorizing motions for pro hac vice admission. See id.
`
`at 1–2; Mot. 1–5.
`
`On this record, we determine that Mr. Pinckney has sufficient
`
`qualifications to represent Patent Owner in this proceeding. We also
`
`determine that Patent Owner has established that there is good cause for the
`
`pro hac vice admission of Mr. Pinckney in this proceeding.
`
`III. ORDER
`
`Accordingly, it is
`
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s Unopposed Motion for Pro Hac Vice
`
`Admission of Mr. C. Ryan Pinckney is GRANTED. Mr. Pinckney is
`
`authorized to represent Patent Owner as back-up counsel in this proceeding
`
`only;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner shall continue to have a
`
`registered practitioner represent it as lead counsel in this proceeding;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Pinckney shall comply with the
`
`Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for
`
`Trials, as set forth in Part 42 of Title 37, Code of Federal Regulations; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Pinckney is subject to the Office’s
`
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a), as well as the Office’s
`
`Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et. seq.
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case IPR2017-01255 (Patent 8,798,593 B2)
`Case IPR2017-01264 (Patent 8,798,647 B1)
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`David L. Cavanaugh
`Daniel V. Williams
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP
`david.Cavanaugh@wilmerhale.com
`daniel.williams@wilmerhale.com
`
`
`Roshan Mansinghani
`Jonathan Stroud
`Unified Patents Inc.
`Roshan@unifiedpatents.com
`jonathan@unifiedpatents.com
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Zachariah S. Harrington
`Larry D. Thompson, Jr.
`Matthew J. Antonelli
`ANTONELLI, HARRINGTON & THOMPSON LLP
`zac@ahtlawfirm.com
`larry@ahtlawfirm.com
`matt@ahtlawfirm.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket