throbber
J
`
`mlr
`
`Skin Pharmacol 1991;4:89-94
`
`© 1991 S. Karger AG, Basel
`1011-0283/91/0042-008952.75t0
`
`Ciclopirox Nail Lacquer 8%: Jn vivo Penetration into and
`through Nails and in vitro Effect on Pig Skin
`
`C,G, CescMtl-Roqz~esa, It. Hb’nelb, S.M. Pruja-Bougaretc, ft. Lz¢ca, J. Vandermander%
`
`G. Michela
`
`a Laboratoire de M icrobiologie Industrielle et Virologic, Facult6 des Sciences Pharmaceutiqucs,
`
`Toulouse, France; bHoechst AG, Frankfurt am Main, BRD;
`c Centre de P.ccherehe Pierre-Fabre Mddicament, Castres, France
`
`Key Words. In vivo nail penetration ¯ Human healthy nails ¯ Ciclopirox ¯
`Microbiological assessment - Pig skin ¯ In vitro antifungal test ¯ Onychomycosis
`
`Abstract. Th is repo.q presents origi hal methods to assess the bioavailability of an antifun-
`gal drug from a varnish preparation in finger nails. For the studies with human volunteers a
`ciclopirox 8 % nail lacquer was used to determine its efficacy in the treatment of onychomy-
`coses. In vivo sludies were performed on the fingernails of healthy volunteers by determining
`the total amount of ciclopirox penetrated per milligram of nail and the partition of the drug
`in the plate of the nails (technically divided into four layers). Ciclopirox concentrations were
`evaluated by measuring the inhibition of Candida pseudotropicalis growth in vitro. The
`ciclopirox concentration after 30 days treatment was determined as 3.35 ± 0.82 gg/mg nail
`material. This is a sufficient amount to kill the fungaI pathogens. In addition, in vitro pen-
`etration experiments were carried out with excised pig skin. Lacquer formulations from 0.5
`to 8 % were used to inhibit the growth of Trichophyton mentagrophytes. Formulations from 2
`to 8 % led to a strong to total inhibition of the dermatophyte after 30 min treatment time.
`
`Introduction
`
`Fungi involved in onychomycosis can
`grow within different nail locations in the
`nail plate and/or the nail bed [1]. This phe-
`nomenon raise’.; the interest of determining
`the penetration of antifungal drugs into and
`through the nail. On the other hand, the
`ultrastructure of the nail can limit this pa-
`rameter [2]. The keratinocytes within the
`nail plate are strongly linked by numerous
`
`desmosomes [3] and surrounded by phos-
`pholipid layers [3]. The nailplate is built up
`by three different layers which could have
`different penetration characteristics, but this
`subject is discussed controversally in the lit-
`erature. The penetration characteristics in
`diseased nails are poorly investigated but it
`is rather likely that the more dehydrated dis-
`eased nail has a reduced penetration for hy-
`drophilic compounds. This report presents
`methods to test the nail penetration of an
`
`’ "i
`
`/
`
`?
`
`2
`
`ARGENTUM EX1017
`
`Page 1
`
`

`

`9O
`
`Ceschin-Roques/H’anel/Pruja-Bougaret/Luc/Vandcrmander/Michel
`
`Penetration of (
`
`antifungal drug by measuring its biological
`activity instead of using radiolabeled mole-
`cules [4]. Additionally, the evaluation of
`large numbers of lacquer formulations
`causes problems due to the limited availabil-
`ity of healthy human nails. Therefore we
`applied an additional method using excised
`pig skin [5], which is a well-established
`method for the evaluation of penetration.
`
`H~inel and Ritter [5] showed that even lac-
`quer formulations can be evaluated on the
`pig skin by applying the samples and subse-
`quent strip of the stratum corneum before
`inoculation with dermatophytes.
`
`Materials and Methods
`
`Chcm icals
`6-Cyclohexyl- l-hydroxy-4-methyl-2-( 1 H)-pyridone
`(ciclopirox free acid) and ciclopirox varnish 8%
`(Centre de Recherche Pierre-Fabre M4dicament/
`Hoechst AG, FRG; patent pending).
`
`In vitro Pig Skin Experiments
`
`In vivo Experimet;ts
`
`The study was performed on the fingernails of 9
`
`healthy volunteers. The anaount of varnish (8% ciclo-
`
`pirox and placebo) applied daily was about 5-15
`
`rag/nail. Before each application and before sampling,
`the residual film of lacqucr was gently removed with
`
`methanol-wetted cotton wool.
`
`Sampling. Four free distal parts of nails were cut
`after 7, 14, 30 (9 subjects) and 45 {4 subjects) days of
`
`application, and aIso 7 and 14 days after the end of
`
`the treatment (4 subjects). The samples of each sub-
`
`ject were used for two different experiments. (1) For
`
`the determination of the total amount of ciclopirox
`
`per milligram of nail (two samples) direct extraction
`
`of ciclopirox and microbiological determination were
`
`performed. (2) In order to evaluate the distribution of
`
`ciclopirox in the nail (two samples) the distal parts of
`the nails were pressed fiat. Then the flattened samples
`were cut by means of a freezing microtome to obtain
`
`four layers in depth of equal thickness. Extraction was
`
`carried out with each layer separately. Repartition of
`
`ciclopirox in the four layers was determined by the
`
`microbiological method described.
`]:2xtraction. Extraction was performed in a 10%
`
`polyethylene glycol 4,000 (PEG) aqueous solution
`
`with a contact time of 48 h. For the determination of
`
`the total amount of ciclopirox per milligram of naiI,
`
`the samples were weighed and extraction was carried
`
`out with 50 I.tl PEG solution per milligram of naih To
`
`For the investigation the back skin of pigs was
`
`assess the distribution of ciclopirox in the nail depth,
`
`used as described in detail elsewhere [5]. The skin was
`shaved and kept on water agar. Lacquer formulations
`
`(5-i0 my) containing 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 8% ciclopi-
`
`rox were applied with a nail varnish brush as was the
`
`placebo lacquer. Treatment time was 30 min through-
`out the different concentrations. In previous cxpcri-
`
`ments (unpublished data) it had been ~ound that
`
`treatment time longer than 1 h leads to a complete
`
`saturation of the skin pieces with ciclopirox and
`
`therefore complete inhibition of fungal growth irre-
`spective of the concentrations used. After the treat-
`
`ment the lacquer was removed with a pair of forceps.
`
`each layer was extracted with 100 HI PEG solution.
`Extraction yield was determined under e~ vivo exper-
`
`imental conditions. A quantity Q of ciclopirox 8%
`
`nail lacquer was applied, equivalent to a total amount
`
`of Qc - 0.08 x Q of ciclopirox. Then the pieces of
`nail were put into a humid chamber during 7 days to
`
`obtain a passive diffusion of" the drug. After elimina-
`
`tion of the residual film of lacquer, ciclopirox was
`
`extracted with 50 ill PEG solution per milligram of
`nail. The extract for the microbiological determina-
`
`tion was defined as Qe (extractible amount of ciclopi-
`
`rox). Qe was identical irrespective of the elimination
`
`Subsequent adhesive tape strips exposed different
`depth of the stratum corneum of the pig skin.
`
`of the residual film, involving a total passive penetra-
`tion of ciclopirox in the nail. In all the cases, extrac-
`
`Inoculation was carried out as described [5] with
`microconidia of Trichopkyton menlagropkytes. Dur-
`ing 7 days of observation the fungal growth was
`
`recorded daily by measuring the size of the mycelium
`
`in comparison to the placebo-treated group [for more
`
`details see ref. 5].
`
`tion yield (Qe/Qc) was estimated at 0.95.
`
`Microbiological Determinatio~z. Ciclopirox con-
`
`centrations in the nail material were evaluated after
`filtrat4on of extracts at room temperature (0.2-~m
`
`pore size glass fiber) by measuring the kinetics of inhi-
`
`bition of Candida pseudotropica/is growth. Determi-
`
`Fig. 1. lnbi!
`g’owlh of 71 *neJ
`c sed pig skin a
`ment with lacc
`c3ntaining differ
`c opirox.
`
`nations were pc:
`parison with a
`determination. I
`solution were ca
`JJl). After additio
`g:ucose broth (D?
`plates were inoet
`t,’opicalis ( 10~ yc
`t:on was carric’d
`(650 nm) v, as re~
`the MIC tb.e t~:st>
`detection limit. "~
`been estimated t,
`data) due to the
`the extraction >,
`ciclopirox in ihe
`in the tour layers
`biological mctiv~
`r,)x in the [ac-luc
`
`In vitro !;,-,
`In lhc test u
`of ciclopirox i~
`campared (fig.
`of fungal grow,
`(10 strips) :
`
`Page 2
`
`

`

`-mander!Michcl
`
`Penetration of Ciclopimx Nail Varnish
`
`tingcrnails of 9
`¯ r~isi~ (8 % ciclo-
`as about 5-15
`c fore sampling,
`. removed with
`
`" nails ,;,ere cut
`Jbjccts) days of
`f~er lhe end of
`-s of each sub-
`mcnts. (I) For
`t cA cich~pirox
`rcct exm~ction
`ruination were
`distribtaion of
`distal paris of
`t c n,,:d samples
`om.c to obtain
`!!x traction was
`Rcparlition of
`mi:,cd by the
`
`~cd ira a 10%
`21~US solution
`::rmim~tion of
`[gram of nail,
`n was carried
`tan of nail. To
`1,.: nail depth,
`
`’E(} solution.
`v, vivo cxper-
`iclopirox 8%
`toted }llllO unt
`the pieces of
`J*,g 7 day’s to
`.i’tcr elimina-
`CiOl:’irox ;’,.as
`milligram of
`
`] determina-
`nt oi"ciciopi-
`
`elimination
`dye pcnctra-
`ascs, exlrac-
`
`oplrox con-
`t] UZltc,;t after
`
`Ire (0.2-11 n1
`
`.:tics f~lillhi-
`
`h, l)ctclnli-
`
`91
`
`[~ 10 strips
`
`6 strips
`
`[Z~ 2 strips
`
`toc
`
`90
`
`80
`
`7o-
`
`60-
`
`50--
`
`t
`
`Fig. 1. Inhibition of fungal
`
`growth of T mentagrophyte.s’ on ex-
`cised pig skin after 30-rain treat-
`ment with lacquer formulations
`
`containing different amounts of ei-
`clopirox.
`
`8 4 3 2 1 0.5
`Concentration of cic!opirox in lacquer, %
`
`nations were performed on microtiter plates in com-
`parison with a ciclopirox solution to evaluate the
`determination. Dilutions of samples and ciclopirox
`solution were carried out with a PEG solution (100
`uI). After addition of the same volume of Neopeptone
`glucose broth (DIFCO, Mich.) to each well, microtiter
`plates were inoculated with suspensions of C. pseudo-
`tropicalis (104 yeasts/ml final concentration). Incuba-
`tion was carried out at 28.5 °C and optical density
`(650 nm) was read at 18 h. At concentrations close to
`the MIC the tests were run for 24 or 48 h to lower the
`detection limit. The limit of ciclopirox detection had
`been estimated to be 0.04 lag/mg of nail (unpublished
`data) due to the sensitivity of C. pseudotropiealis and
`the extraction yield. To assess the distribution of
`ciclopirox in the nail matrix, the relative percentage
`in the four layers was determined by the same micro-
`biological method. The limit of solubility of ciclopi-
`rox in the lacquer is around 12%.
`
`Results
`
`In vitro Experiments
`In the test using pig skin six concentrations
`of ciclopirox in the lacquer formulation were
`compared (fig. 1): 0.5 % led to a low inhibition
`of fungal growth close to the stratum tucidum
`(10 strips) : 63.4%, whereas in the upper
`
`layers 84.1% (6 strips) and 88.11% (2 strips)
`inhibition of fungal growth was recorded. 1%
`lacquer led to comparative results. The 2%
`formulation was only tested down to the 6-
`strip layer and showed 100% inhibition at
`this depth. 3 % lacquer was also tested at the
`stratum lucidum (10 strips) and led to
`99.72% inhibition just like the 4% lacquer.
`The 8% lacquer however resulted in total
`inhibition (100%) in all layers investigated.
`
`In vivo Experiments
`Kinetics of Cic/opirox Penetration. After
`correction by the extraction yield, individual
`ciclopirox concentrations and means and
`standard errors were calculated and are
`given in micrograms per milligram of nail in
`table 1. Figure 2 shows the increase of the
`ciclopirox concentration in the nail during
`the first 30 days and the persistence of a
`steady state between the 30th and the 45th
`day of the daily application. The repartition
`of ciclopirox in the nail plate is indicated in
`table2 by relative percentage values ob-
`served in the four layers. After 7 days of
`daily application, the greater amount of ci-
`
`Page 3
`
`

`

`i °
`
`92tz"~ t
`
`Ceschin-RoqueslH~inel/Pruja-Bougaret/Luc/Vanderma n der/Michel
`
`Penelrali
`
`clopirox was obtained in the first layer
`(51.5 %) and a progressive decrease occurred
`in the deeper layers. Ciclopirox levels were
`not detectable in layer 3 for 2 subjects and in
`layer 4 for 3 subjects, in al! cases, penetra-
`
`tion through tile nail down to the lburth
`
`layer was relatively low. A more homoge-
`neous partition of ciclopirox appeared after
`
`14 days of application, always with a higher
`
`level in the first layer (32%). At this time,
`
`penetration occurred down to the fourth
`
`layer (23%). The same phenomenon could
`
`be observed after 30 days of application.
`Ciclopirox Concentration afler Treat-
`
`mont. These studies were performed on 4
`
`Fir{. 2
`clop, irox
`mulatien
`jects. Tre
`30 or to ,
`
`/
`
`,/
`
`Table 1. Concentrations of cicIopirox in nails
`(pg/mg nail)
`
`Subject
`
`Duration of treatment
`
`7
`days
`
`0, I
`
`1.1
`
`2.6
`
`1.3
`
`0,18
`
`0.6
`
`0.45
`
`14 30
`days
`days
`
`0.3
`
`1.5
`
`3,3
`
`3,8
`
`0.5
`
`1.6
`
`0.95
`
`0.95
`
`1.7
`
`3.2
`
`6
`
`1.3
`
`2,3
`
`1.2
`
`45
`days
`
`ND
`
`1.55
`
`3.3
`
`ND
`
`ND
`
`1.94
`1.26
`
`ND
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`0.7
`1
`
`1.3
`2.8
`
`6.5
`7
`
`ND
`
`Mean 0,892 1,783 3.35 2.01
`SE
`0,413
`0.252
`0.822
`0.45
`
`ND = Not determined; SE = standard error.
`
`healthy volunteers, 7 and 14 days after the
`
`end of the treatment. Results are presented
`
`in table 3 and indicate a progressive decrease
`
`of the active drug concentrations, which felt
`
`below the limit of detection 14 days after the
`
`end of ciclopirox treatment.
`
`Tnble 2. Relative percentages of ciclopirox in the four nail layers (1-4)
`
`Subject 7-day sample
`
`14-day sample
`
`30-day sample
`
`1
`
`32
`
`52
`
`2
`
`28
`
`41
`
`4
`
`11
`
`3
`
`29
`
`7.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`1
`
`34
`
`30
`
`2
`
`25
`
`22
`
`3
`
`21
`
`22
`
`4
`
`20
`
`26
`
`1
`
`33
`
`40
`
`2
`
`45
`
`21
`
`3
`
`12
`
`19
`
`4
`
`10
`
`treat or
`
`Among
`tare [7],
`zole [9]
`since 1
`expcrir.,-
`were p,
`
`on.veho~
`
`ketocon
`prior ~
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`60
`
`45
`
`56
`
`41
`
`48
`
`26
`
`34
`
`44
`
`33
`
`43
`
`9
`
`17
`
`-
`
`18
`
`5
`
`4
`
`8
`
`30
`
`32
`
`36
`
`34
`
`20
`
`28
`
`29
`
`28
`
`24
`
`18
`
`!7
`
`13
`
`26
`
`22
`
`i8
`
`25
`
`15
`
`38
`
`41
`
`36
`
`38
`
`20
`
`26
`
`24
`
`20
`
`22
`
`19
`
`16
`
`21
`
`20
`
`20
`
`14
`
`24
`
`21
`
`"Far, k:
`nai!) al t!
`later
`
`8
`
`9
`
`!0
`
`47
`
`55
`
`60
`
`36
`
`21
`
`40
`
`9
`
`11
`
`16
`
`-
`
`6
`
`8
`
`-
`
`33
`
`23
`
`40
`
`28
`
`15
`
`28
`
`22
`
`24
`
`22
`
`18
`
`23
`
`37
`
`27
`
`20
`
`25
`
`28
`
`34
`
`28
`
`31
`
`25
`
`25
`
`26
`
`32
`
`23
`
`20
`
`26
`
`I9
`
`24
`
`21
`
`20
`
`18
`
`Mean 49.6 34.6 11.6 4.2 32 ~4.1 21.2 22.7 34.7 26.4 19.7 19.2
`
`SE
`
`2.8 2.4 2.8 1.3
`
`1.5 1,4 1.1 2.1
`
`1.5 2.4 1.2 1.4
`
`Subject
`
`2
`
`3
`
`6
`
`7
`
`Page 4
`
`

`

`ander/Michel
`
`t]rst layer
`e occurred
`evcls were
`ects and in
`s, pcnetra-
`tim fourth
`: homoge-
`:arcd after
`h a higher
`this time,
`hc fBurth
`~on could
`cation.
`:’r Treal-
`ned on 4
`after the
`presented
`: decrease
`uhJch fell
`; alier the
`
`l 0
`
`2O
`
`2O
`
`14
`
`24
`
`21
`
`24
`
`2t
`
`2(;
`
`18
`
`Penetration of Ciclopirox Nail Varnish
`
`93
`
`1E+02
`
`~’ IK+01
`K
`
`! I E+00
`
`,E-o t I[.y
`
`i IE-02
`
`i
`0 ~0 20 30 40
`Days af~er star1 of treatment
`
`i
`50
`
`1
`60
`
`Fig. 2. Ungual penetration ofci-
`clopirox from an 8% lacquer for-
`mulation in the fingernails of 9 sub-
`jects. Treatment from day 0 to day
`30 or to day 45.
`
`Discussion
`
`Numerous attempts have been made to
`treat onychomycoses by topical antifungals.
`Among these were clotrimazole [6], tolnaf-
`tate [7], miconazole [8], and recently bifona-
`zole [9]. Ciclopirox has proved to be effective
`since 1979 [10]; also cow horn penetration
`experiments with ciclopiroxolamine cream
`were performed. The systemic therapy of
`onychomycoses with azole-compounds like
`ketoconazole has to be considered carefully
`prior to treatment due to the possibility
`
`Table 3. Residual amounts of ciclopirox (,ug/mg
`nail) at the end of treatment (D45) and 7 and 14 days
`later
`
`Subject
`
`2
`
`3
`
`6
`
`7
`
`D45
`
`1.55
`
`3,3
`
`1.94
`
`1.26
`
`7 days I4 days
`
`005
`
`0.32
`
`0.13
`
`0.(/4
`
`0.04
`
`0.04
`
`0.04
`
`0.04
`
`of serious side effects [11]. From its composi-
`tion the nail plate is more like hair than like
`stratum corneum [12]; therefore the penetra-
`tion characteristics arc remarkably different
`from the skin. From the in vivo results (fig. 3)
`it is obvious that under treatment a steady
`state is reached which enables the inhibition
`and killing of fungi like Trichophyton spp.
`Also the MICs for fungi like Hendersonula
`spp. and other causative agents ofonychomy-
`coses are more or less within the range of
`concentrations calculated.
`Among the group of nails investigated
`there were some (e.g. subjects 1, 5 and 7)
`which did not accumulate high concentra-
`tions of the compound. The variation of the
`nail structure in the individua! onychomyco-
`sis patient is also of clinical importance. In
`all clinical trials a considerable part of ’non-
`responders’ cannot be explained by a lack of
`compliance since it is often due to hydration
`problems and other mo~lghological differ-
`ences in the nails.
`
`Nevertheless, ciclopiroxolamine proved
`to be effective even as a 1% cream-solution
`
`Page 5
`
`

`

`o
`
`94
`
`_m
`
`Ceschin-Roques/H~nel/Pruja-Bougaret/[.uc/Vandcrnlandcr/Michel
`
`7 days
`
`14 days
`
`30 days
`
`combination therapy for !2.7 _+ 5.6 weeks.
`Among 150 patients 57% showed complete
`clinical and mycological cure [13]. We con-
`sider ciclopirox as one of the few antimy-
`cotic compounds with the proven ability to
`penetrate through the human nail plate.
`
`References
`
`1 Baran R, Dawber RPR: Guide mfidico-chirurgical
`des onychopathies. Paris, Arnette, 1990.
`2 Waiters KA: Penetration of chemicals into, and
`through the nail plate. Pharm Int April 1985:86-
`89.
`3 Bereiter-Hahn J, Malolsy AG, Richard KS: Biol-
`ogy of the Integument. Berlin, Springer, 1986, vol
`2.
`4 Tuttgen G, Bauer E: Bioavailability, skin and nail
`penetration of topically applied antimycotics. My-
`kosen 1982;25:74-80.
`5 Hfinel H, Ritter W: Formulations; in Ryley JF
`(ed): Chemotherapy of fungal diseases. Handbook
`Exp Pharmacol. Berlin, Springer, 1990, vol 97, pp
`251-278.
`6 Schubert E: Klinische Erfahrungen bei der Bc-
`handlung yon Nagelmykosen mit dem neuen An-
`timykotikum BAY b 5097 (Clotrimazol). Z
`Hautkr 1973;48:887-891.
`7 Ishii M, Hamada T, Asai Y: Treatment ofonycho-
`mycosis by ODT therapy with 20% urea ointment
`
`Fig. 3. Relative percentages of
`ciclopirox in four different layers of
`human fingernails after 7, 14, and
`30 days of treatment with an 8%
`ciclopirox lacquer formulation. Ab-
`solute values are given in table 2.
`
`and 2 % tolnaflate ointment. Dermatologica 1983;
`167:273-279.
`8 Rollman O: Treatment ofonychomycosis by par-
`tial nail avulsion and topical miconazole. Derma-
`tologica 1982;165:54-61.
`9 Nohing S: Non-traumatic removal of the nail and
`simultaneous treatment of onychomycosis. Der-
`matologica 1984;169(suppl 1):117-120.
`I0 Dittmar W, Grau W: Ciclopirox: Substanz mit
`Aspekten ffir Mykologic und Kosmetik. )~rztl
`Kosmetol 1979;9:209-214.
`I 1 Zaias N, Drachman D: A method for the determi-
`nation of drug effectiveness in onychomycosis. J
`Am Acad Dermatol ! 983;9:912-919.
`12 Walters KA, Flynn GL: Permeability characteris-
`tics of the human nail plate. Int J Cosmet Sei
`1983;5:231-246.
`13 Quadripur SA, Horn G, Hochler T: Zur Lokalwirk-
`samkeit von Ciclopiroxolamin bei Nagelmyko-
`sen. Arzneimittelforsch ung 1981 ;31:1369-1372.
`
`Received: blarch 30, 1990
`Accepted: October 18, 1990
`
`C.G. Ceschin-Roques
`Laboratoire de Microbiologie Industrielle et
`Virologie
`Faculte des Sciences Pharmaceutiques
`31, all~es Jules-Guesde
`F-31000 Toulouse (France)
`
`Skin
`
`G. ,l
`
`Lab,
`Touh
`Cen
`
`Ciclor;i
`
`Ab~t
`cream. (cid:128)
`stratum
`pigs inc
`inhibiti
`stratum
`in four l
`lion fro
`which a
`
`lntro
`
`Ciclc
`fungal h
`
`clinical
`3]. Cuta
`tophyte.~
`
`lar a ft] ~
`
`Therefo:
`drugs in
`the first
`
`value. T
`
`pig skin
`
`Page 6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket