throbber
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 322 (I973) 269-278
`© Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam - Printed in The Netherlands
`
`BBA 36524
`
`A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES
`OF HUMAN KERATINIZED TISSUES
`
`HOWARD P. BADEN, LOWELL A. GOLDSMITH AND BARBARA FLEMING
`
`Department of, Dermatology, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston,
`Mass. (U.S.A.)
`
`(Received April 4th, 1973)
`
`SUMMARY
`
`Stratum corneum, hair and nail are all derived from ectodermal cells but show
`significant structural differences in their fully differentiated form. However, X-ray
`diffraction studies indicate that they all contain an a-fibrous protein with the same
`molecular dimensions. The greater tensile strength and stability to heating of hair
`and nail compared to stratum corneum can be explained by their higher content of
`half cystine. Studies of the isolated structural proteins indicate that the appendages
`contain a non-helical matrix component very rich in cystine while stratum corneum
`does not. Furthermore, stratum corneum has an a-fibrous protein with physico-
`chemical properties quite different from those of hair and nail, which are very similar
`to one another. Despite different morphological characteristics, it appears that hair
`and nail have differentiated along very similar lines. However, subtle differences in
`the relative proportion and composition of the structural proteins can be detected.
`A distinguishing feature of stratum corneum is its large content of lipids which make
`it an effective barrier to the diffusion of water.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Keratinized tissues exhibit considerable heterogeneity in composition but they
`all contain structural proteins as major constituents12. In mammals these structural
`proteins are a mixture of a-fibrous and globular proteins in varying proportions~,4.
`Studies of wool proteins have demonstrated considerable species variation in physico-
`chemical properties, and in addition the fibrous and non-fibrous components them-
`selves are heterogeneous5. No such data is available, however, on human hair, stratum
`corneum and nail plate.
`A recent report on the harlequin fetuss, a genetic disorder of keratinization,
`has indicated that there can be an abnormality of the fibrous proteins of epidermis
`without a similar change in hair. This suggests that the formation of fibrous proteins
`in the epidermis and appendages may be under the control of separate genes. One
`might anticipate, therefore, that differences could be observed in the fibrous protein
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ARGENTUM EX1028
`
`Page 1
`
`

`

`of different keratinized tissues and perhaps in their non-fibrous components as well.
`Crounse7 compared the alkali-soluble proteins of hair, epidermis and nail and demon-
`strated striking similarities. The analyses were done on whole tissue, however, without
`prior separation of the different protein components. Development of newer tech-
`niques for tile identification of the various structural proteins of keratinized tissue
`has made it possible to compare more precisely the proteins of epidermis, nail and
`hair. The purpose of this report is to compare the structural protein of human
`stratum corneum, nail and hair and relate these to the differences and similarities in
`tile physical properties of these tissues.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`All tile chemicals used were of reagent grade except iodoacetic acid which was
`crystallized from anhydrous ether and light petroleum. Hair and nail clippings were
`obtained from normal individuals and washed with light petroleum before being used.
`Epidermis was separated from autopsy skin heated at 5o°C for 3o s and its under-
`surface was scraped with a scalpel to remove adherent epidermal cells. The remaining
`membrane consisted entirely of stratum corneum.
`
`Extraction procedures
`The various tissues were homogenized in 20 vol. of 0 M urea in o.I M Tris,
`pH 9.o, (Tris urea) and stirred at room temperature for 24 h. Following centrifu-
`gation the extraction was repeated a second time. The undissolved pellet was then
`extracted (io mg/ml) at 5° °C for 2 h under nitrogen in Tris-urea with o.I M mer-
`captoethanol for stratum corneum and 0.2 M mercaptoethanol for hair and nail. The
`suspension was centrifuged and an aliquot of the supernatant treated with iodoacetic
`acid to give the S-carboxymethyl derivatives. We have determined that these con-
`ditions give complete reduction and blockage of cystine residues. The alkylated and
`remaining untreated extracts were then dialyzed against distilled water and lyo-
`philized.
`
`X-ray diffraction
`X-ray diffraction analysis was done using nickle-filtered copper Ka radiation
`(2 = 1.54 A) at 4° kV at a specimen to film distance of 1.5o cm. Regenerated filaments
`for X-ray diffraction analysis were prepared by dissolving the protein in 8o % formic
`acid, picking up the solution on the tip of forceps and stretching while drying at
`room temperature.
`
`Stress-strain analysis
`Samples of hair were held between two sets of nylon clamps, one attached to a
`Stratham strain gauge (Stratham Lab., Los Angeles) and the other to a variable speed
`motor. The hair could be immersed in water or the whole apparatus placed in a
`chamber in which the humidity could be regulated. The specimen was stretched at
`constant rate and the tension recorded. Sonic velocity was measured by a dynamic
`modulus tester (L. M. Morgan Co., Cambridge, Mass.) as previously described9. The
`modulus of elasticity of nail was measured by deflection of the nail with different
`weights~°.
`
`Page 2
`
`

`

`PHYSICOCHEMISTRY OF KERATINIZED TISSUES
`
`271
`
`Water holding
`The water holding capacity was determined by suspending specimens from
`calibrated quartz springs in glass chambers in a constant temperature bath held at
`25 °C. The weight of the sample was determined by measuring the extension of the
`spring with a cathetometer. The humidity was controlled by placing anhydrous
`CaSO4 or saturated solutions of the various salts in the bottom of the chambersu.
`
`Water diffusion
`The diffusion of water was measured with aluminium chambers filled with
`water to which the specimen was fixed as a membrane. The chambers were stored
`with the specimen in contact with the water in desiccators at room temperature and
`weighed periodically to determine the rate of water loss.
`
`Amino acid analysis
`Samples for amino acid analysis were hydrolyzed in 6 M HC1 for 24 h under
`vacuum at IiO °C and run in duplicate on a Beckman 116 amino acid analyzer.
`
`Electrophoresis
`Disc electrophoresis was done at pH 8.3 using a 7% acrylamide gel with and
`without 6 M urea12.
`
`S content
`Total S content was determined gravimetrically following its oxidation to
`SO4~ and the addition of Ba (Belmont Analytical Lab,).
`
`RESULTS
`
`X-ray diffraction
`The results of X-ray diffraction analysis of human hair, nail and stratum
`corneum are shown in Table I. Although the same reflections are observed in hair
`and nail, the reflections in the former are much sharper indicating a higher degree of
`orientation. Unstretched stratum corneum shows only unoriented halos when the
`X-ray beam is perpendicular to the surface of the specimen but a partially oriented
`a pattern when it is parallel. After stretching the specimen the a pattern shows much
`sharper reflections. The orientation of filaments is parallel to the growth axis in hair
`
`TABLE I
`
`WIDE ANGLE X-RAY DIFFRACTION REFLECTIONS OF STRATUM CORNEUM, HAIR AND NAIL
`
`Very weak reflections were found at 4.15 ~ and/or 4.39 ~ (somewhat accentuated on the
`meridion} in some specimens of hair and nail and are likely due to c~ntarnination with scap1°.
`
`Equatorial Meridional
`reflection
`reflections
`A
`A
`
`Stratum corneum
`(oriented)
`Nail
`Hair
`
`9,8
`9.8
`9.8
`
`4.15, 5.14
`5. t 4
`5.14
`
`Page 3
`
`

`

`272
`
`H.P. BADEN t:l a[.
`
`and perpendicular in nail, while in epidermis there is only planar orientation unless
`the specimen is stretched. In epidermis an additional intense reflection can be seen
`at 4.15 ~ which is meridional in position with stretched tissue. Treatment of the tissue
`with polar organic solvents removes this reflection and it has been shown the material
`producing it has the characteristics of a lipidla.
`
`Water holding capacity
`The water holding capacity of stratum corneum, hair and nail at different
`relative humidities is shown in Fig. x. Much more water is held by stratum corneum
`than by hair or nail at high humidity. The data at low humidity is less reliable because
`of difficulty in reaching equilibrium conditions. Washing the tissues with a chloro-
`form-methanol mixture (3:x, v/v) followed by soaking in water markedly reduces
`the uptake of water by stratum corneum, but has no measurable effect on the other
`two tissues.
`
`!
`
`4°t
`
`60
`
`\
`
`0 20 40 60 80 I 0 0
`9~ RELATIVE HUMIDITY
`
`Fig. i. Water content of stratum corneum, hair and nail at different relative humidities. 0,
`stratum corneum; A, stratum corneum extracted with a chloroform-methanol mixture; ×, nail
`and hair which gave identical results.
`
`Water diffusion
`The flux of water across stratum obtained from skin of the anterior abdominal
`wall is in the range o.14 to 0.35 mgicm2 per h. Values almost ten times higher than
`this (2.0-3.0 mg!cm2 per h) are observed for nail plate. Since the thickness of stratum
`corneum is about I/IOO that of nail, the diffusion constant of water is several hundred
`times greater for nail compared to stratum corneum. No effect of chloroform-
`methanol (3 :z, v/v) extraction and soaking in water is observed for water flux in
`nail but the value for stratum corneum is increased almost Io-fold (z.9-3.2 mg/cm2
`per h) with this treatment.
`
`Response to heating in water
`The X-ray diffraction pattern of stratum corneum, nail and hair was determined
`before and after heating in water at 85 °C (ref. I4). No change is observed with hair
`and nail but with stratum corneum the pattern is lost and replaced by a cross fl one.
`Further heating of hair and nail produces no change until I3o °C when a poorly
`
`Page 4
`
`

`

`PHYSICOCHEMISTRY OF KERATINIZED TISSUES
`
`273
`
`oriented parallel fl pattern is noted in place of the normal a pattern. Isometric con-
`traction studies of stratum corneum show a marked increase in tension starting at
`about 80 °C but no contraction is observed with nail and hair even when the heating
`is continued to 95 °C.
`
`Modulus of elasticity
`The modulus of elasticity can be determined by several techniques. The
`measurement of the modulus of elasticity by sonic velocity techniques permits a
`direct comparison of all three tissues and the modulus of elasticity for stratum cor-
`neum, hair and nail are shown in Table II. The latter two have a much higher modulus
`
`TABLE I1
`
`YOUNG’S MODULUS FOR NAIL, HAIR AND STRATUM CORNEUM BY THE SONIC VELOCITY AND
`
`MECHANICAL TESTS
`
`Some oriention of abdominal stratum corneum occurs during drying of the specimens.
`
`Number off
`specimens
`
`Young modulus
`(dynesicm~ × zo-1° :~ S.D.)
`
`Sonic velocity
`technique
`
`Mechanical stretching
`
`50% R.H.
`
`zoo% R.H.
`
`70% R.H.
`
`Nail 12
`Hair
`13
`Stratum corneum
`Abdominal 2
`Sole
`2
`
`4.3 ± 0.4
`8.8 4- 0.6
`
`1,8 4- 0.5
`1.5 4 o.2
`
`2.6 -k 0.4
`2.3 ~- 0.3
`
`1.2 4- o.68
`0.47 4- o.15
`
`o,13 ~_ 0.07
`
`o,i9 4- o.04
`
`than the former. This same difference is also observed when mechanical methods of
`measurement are used and these relative differences are also apparent at different
`degrees of hydration of the tissue. Extraction of the tissue with a polar organic solvent
`(chloroform-methanol, 3 :i, v/v) does not alter the results indicating that the differ-
`ences are related to the structural proteins and their intrinsic organization.
`
`Amino acid analysis of whole tissue
`The amino acid composition of hair, stratum corneum and nail is shown in
`Table III. Although both hair and nail show a much higher content of half cystine
`than epidermis, the value for hair is higher than that for nail. Analyses of total S
`confirm these differences in half cystine content.
`
`Extraction of proteins
`The solubility of tissue proteins was studied in hair, nail and stratum corneum
`by first extracting the tissue with Tris-urea and then with the same buffer with the
`addition of o.I M mercaptoethanol. The results are shown in Table IV and indicate
`that in all three tissues the addition of a reducing agent markedly increases the yield
`of protein. The Tris-urea buffer did extract more protein from stratum corneum,
`however, and about half of this remained soluble when the extract was dialyzed
`against a neutral salt solution. Electrophoretic patterns of the urea-soluble proteins
`
`Page 5
`
`

`

`TABLE I[1
`
`AMINO ACID ANALYSIS OF HAIR, NAIL AND STRATUM CORNEUM
`
`The values given are the mcan of four different samples and arc expressed as residues per too
`residues. The S content is percent dry weight.
`
`A mino acid
`
`Hair
`
`Nail
`
`Stral~m
`
`COF~ebtYn
`
`Lysine
`Histidine
`Arginine
`Aspartic acid
`Threonine
`Serine
`Glutamic acid
`Proline
`Glycine
`Alanine
`Valine
`Methionine
`Isoleucine
`l+eucine
`T yrosine
`Phenylalaninc
`Halfcystine
`
`2.5
`0.9
`6.5
`5.4
`7-1)
`I2,2
`I2.2
`8.4
`5.8
`4.3
`5-5
`0.5
`2.3
`6, t
`2.2
`1.7
`~5.9
`o /
`¯ 4.5/o
`
`3. r
`~.o
`6.4
`7.o
`0. I
`iI.3
`I3.6
`
`4.2
`1.5
`3.8
`7.9
`3"O
`13.6
`I2.6
`
`5.9
`7.9
`5.5
`4.2
`0.7
`2.7
`8.3
`,3- z
`2.5
`1o.6
`~, o,
`3, - ..’o
`
`,3.o
`24.5
`4.4
`3.o
`t, [
`2.7
`6,9
`3.4
`3.2
`1.2
`¯ ~., o
`I t o/
`
`i ndicate that there are several components. X-ray diffraction patterns of the urea-
`s oluble proteins show no evidence of an a pattern, but a cross f! pattern is recognizable
`in a pH 2.65-soluble and pH 7.o-insoluble fraction from stratum corneum15.
`In the case of alt three tissues oriented filaments which give an a pattern by
`X-ray diffraction analysis can be prepared from the proteins solubilized by the buffer
`containing mercaptoethanol. The extracted proteins were converted to the S-carboxy-
`methyl derivatives to prevent the disulfide bonds from reforming. In order to solu-
`bilize the tyophilized S-carboxymethyl proteins with buffers in the pH range 7.o to
`9.o, urea at a concentration of 6 M has to be added. The nail and hair proteins remain
`in solution at concentrations up to at least 1% upon removal of the urea, but the
`stratum corneum proteins precipitate out of solution unless they are at a concen-
`tration below about o.1%. Disc electrophoresis of the S-carboxymethyl proteins
`
`TABLE IV
`
`AM[OUNT OF PROTEIN SOLUBILIZEI) BY DIFFERENT EXTRACTION PI~.OCEIIURPLS
`
`The tissue was treated sequentially with the two solvents. The data are expressed as perc~ J ! of
`initial dry weight of tissue.
`
`Tissue
`
`Percent yield -k S,D.
`
`6 ~FI urea with
`o.± M Tris (pH 9.o)
`
`6 3I urea with o.s ~’a/l
`Tris (pH 9.o) and o,s 3/1
`mercaptoethanol
`
`Stratum corneum
`Hair
`Nail
`
`25 -~ 5
`3 ~ 2
`I2 ± 4
`
`40±6
`40±3
`38~4
`
`Page 6
`
`

`

`PHYSICOCHEMISTRY OF KERATINIZED TISSUES
`
`275
`
`shows only a diffuse band at the origin of the running gel. Electrophoresis done in
`the presence of 6 M urea, however, gives distinct bands (Fig. 2). The electrophoretic
`patterns of hair and nail appear to be identical and this was confirmed by using
`IO% gels 15 cm long and run for twice the usual time. The most anodal component
`from hair and nail can be separated from the others by its solubility at pH 4.5 in
`o.5 M KC1. Filaments prepared from the insoluble proteins show an a pattern while
`those from the soluble ones show only unoriented halos. Disc electrophoretic patterns
`
`H N H : S
`
`i
`Fig. 2. Disc electrophoretic patterns of hair and nail S-carboxymethyl proteins in 6 M urea. H,
`hair; N, nail.
`
`Fig. 3. Disc electrophoretic patterns of hair and stratum corneum S-carboxymethyl proteins in
`6 M urea. H, hair; S, stratum corneum.
`
`of a protein from stratum corneum (Fig. 3) in 6 M urea show a completely different
`pattern from those of nail and hair. When solutions of the protein are adjusted to
`pH 4.5 with the addition of 0.5 M KC1, only trace amounts remain soluble.
`Amino acid analysis of the ffactionated nail and hair proteins is shown in
`Table V and indicates the striking difference in composition especially with regard
`to half cystine between the pH 4.5-soluble and -insoluble proteins. The same fractions
`from hair and nail on the other hand show a close similarity. Amino acid analysis of
`the pH 4.5-insoluble proteins from stratum corneum, however, is much different than
`either fraction of hair and nail.
`
`Page 7
`
`

`

`276
`
`TABLE V
`
`n.P. BAI)E,N gl al.
`
`AMINO ACID ANALYSIS OF HAIR, NAIL AND STRATUM CORNEUM S-CARBOKVMI~THYL PROTEINS
`
`The a proteins are insoluble at pH 4,5 in the presence of 0.5 M KC1 while the matrix ones are
`soluble. The values are expressed as residues per Ioo residues.
`
`.,t mino acid
`
`Hair
`
`Nail
`
`Stratum corneum
`
`3lalrix
`
`~
`
`Matrix
`
`r~
`
`a
`
`2.9
`0.6
`7.0
`8,4
`5-9
`lO.5
`17,1
`5,6
`5.3
`6.0
`
`5-3
`0.6
`3.o
`9.8
`2.8
`2, I
`
`i.o
`o.8
`0.3
`3.2
`9.9
`13-1
`lo. ~
`lO,9
`3-9
`2.3
`4.8
`0.3
`1.8
`3,7
`
`I .(I
`
`1.3
`
`2.8
`o. 7
`7, i
`io.4
`3.9
`9.4
`14,8
`
`5,3
`8.8
`8.3
`3.9
`trace
`2.9
`lO.7
`
`3.0
`
`2,5
`
`0,7
`i. i
`5.o
`3.7
`lO.4
`I3.O
`8.7
`12,8
`6.9
`2.5
`4.3
`I.i
`1.9
`4,6
`
`1.0
`
`1.4
`
`7-1 25.0
`
`5.5 20-3
`
`Lysine
`Histidine
`Arginine
`Aspartic acid
`Threonine
`Serine
`Glutamic acid
`Proline
`Glycine
`Alanine
`Valine
`Methionine
`Isoleucine
`Leucine
`Tyrosine
`Phenylalanine
`S-carboxyrnethyl
`eysteine
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`4,3
`i.o
`4.8
`9.5
`3.9
`II.7
`13.7
`2,3
`18.0
`5.6
`3,7
`1.5
`3.2
`8.5
`3.2
`3.4
`
`I.O
`
`These studies indicate that there is a striking similarity in the physical and
`chemical properties of hair and nail, although there are some clear differences. Both
`show a similar modulus of elasticity by the sonic velocity as well as mechanical
`methods. The higher values obtained from hair using the sonic modulus reflects the
`higher degree of filament orientation and this is also shown by the sharper reflections
`observed in the X-ray diffraction patterns. Although in human nails the filaments
`are aligned perpendicular to the growth axis, the reverse of hair, this is not a general
`property of nails but appears to be related to their shapel°.
`Hair and nail are also quite similar in their capacity to absorb water at varying
`relative humidities. Although the diffusion of water through hair was not measured,
`data on the rate of hydration by measurement of swelling suggest that it must be
`relatively rapid and similar to nail. The lack of an effect of extraction with polar
`organic solvents and water is also similar for both tissues.
`The stability of the a helix to heating in water is also similar and no change
`in the a pattern is observed until the tissues are placed at 13o °C (refs IO and 16).
`This stability appears to be related in part to the organization and composition of
`the structural proteins. The configuration which appears after heating is a partially
`oriented parallel fl and the orientation, in the case of hair, can be improved by gentle
`stretching.
`The differences observed between the total S and half cystine content of hair
`and nail can be explained in part by variation in the amount of matrix component.
`The relative amount of protein precipitated at pH 4-5 with o.5 M KC1 is greater for
`
`Page 8
`
`

`

`PHYSICOCFIEMISTRY OF KERATINIZED TISSUES
`
`277
`
`hair than nail. It is also likely that some difference in the matrix component exists
`since the half cystine contents appear to be different.
`Stratum corneum shows both quantitative and qualitative differences from
`hair with respect to many of its physicochemical properties. The a filaments are
`present both in the appendageal tissues and stratum corneum, but in the latter these
`structures lie parallel to the surface, with no specific directional orientation unless
`the tissue is stretched. The organization of the filaments and their relationship to
`matrix components is also quite different and this is reflected in a number of para-
`meters. The modulus of elasticity as measured both by the sonic and mechanical
`methods is much lower than for hair or nail. Isometric contractions of epidermis with
`melting of the a helix and conversion to a cross/~ structure occurs at about 80 °C,
`while hair and nail show change in configuration at 13o °C and form a partially
`oriented parallel ft. These differences are certainly related in part to the organization
`of the filaments and the cross-links between them and matrix proteins, but differences
`in the filamentous structures themselves may be a factor, The a proteins isolated
`from stratum corneum behave as macromolecular aggregates and can not be easily
`separated into a number of distinct components as can hair and nail. The proteins
`from stratum corneum show a considerable difference in amino acid composition from
`those of the appendages and this is particularly true with respect to half cystine.
`Considering the much lower values of half cystine in stratum corneum proteins and
`the care taken to completely reduce and block the bonds, it is difficult to explain the
`tendency toward aggregation on residual cystine bonds. The presence of other cross-
`links is suggested by the finding of blocked e-lysine groups in the fibrous proteins of
`stratum corneum and these may explain some of the differences in physical proper-
`ties17.
`
`The structural proteins of stratum corneum also differ from those of the
`appendages with regard to the matrix components. No distinct proteins rich in
`cystine have been identified in the stratum corneum. The insolubility of the structural
`proteins, however, is dependent on disulfide cross-links. It has been shown earlier
`that intermolecular cystine cross-links are not present in the prekeratin filaments of
`the viable epidermis but are formed during the latter stages of keratinization and are
`responsible for the change in solubility of the filamentsis. That the number and
`perhaps character of the cystine bonds differs in stratum corneum compared to the
`appendages may be reflected in their varying response to temperature both with
`respect to the temperature of melting of the helix and change in molecular con-
`figuration. These findings indicate that there are significant differences in the inter-
`action of the varying structural proteins in these different keratinizing tissues, al-
`though the same cross-link appears to be important in both.
`One of the most striking differences between stratum corneum and the ap-
`pendages is in the absorption and diffusion of water. At high relative humidities
`stratum corneum absorbs several-fold more water than the other two tissues. This
`appears to be related to the presence of water absorbing materials which can be
`removed by the extraction of the tissue with polar organic solvents and water.
`Following such treatment water absorption is similar to hair and nail, which are
`unaffected by the extraction procedures. The lower diffusion constant of water in
`stratum corneum compared to nail (and presumably hair) is also increased by the
`extraction procedure. It has been suggested that these properties of stratum are
`
`Page 9
`
`

`

`278
`
`H.P. BADEN et al.
`
`dependent on the presence of a particular lipid which is responsible for the barrier
`characteristic. However, attempts to identify a specific lipid by chromatographic
`techniques were not successfuPu. Baden and Goldsmith13 were able to demonstrate
`the presence of a lipid component by X-ray diffraction techniques which appeared
`to have a distinct structural relationship to the filaments. From their observations
`it is possible to develop a bimolecular membrane modei similar to what has been
`described for other tissues. Recently Scheuplein and Morgan2° have offered an alterna-
`tive explaination. They have suggested that diffusion of water is limited by bound
`water and the role of lipid is to form a compIex with the tissue proteins and other
`water absorbing materials and thus maintain the bound water. Although the exact
`mechanism underlying the interaction of water with stratum corneum is not entirely
`dear, it must be different than that of hair and nail. This appears to be directly
`related to the important function of the stratum corneum as a diffusion barrier.
`These results indicate the extent of diversity which can be observed in kera-
`tinized tissues. Although derived from a common cell type, they can exhibit funda-
`mental differences in their fully differentiated form. This in part may explain how
`genetic disorders of keratinizing tissues can involve one type while the remainder
`appear to be uninvolved. Studies are in progress using the techniques described to
`study certain disorders of keratinizing tissues.
`
`ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
`
`This work was supported by N.I.H. grant No. AM o6838.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`I Crewther, k¥. G., Fraser, R. D. B., Lennok, F. G. and Londley, H. (1965) Adv. Prot. Chem. 20,
`191-346
`z Mercer, E. H. (I96I) Keratin and Keratinization, pp. 1 5I, Pergamon, New York
`3 Corfield, M. C. and Fletcher, J. C. (I968) ,~ymposium on Fibrous Proteins, pp. 299-313, Plenum,
`New York
`4 Thompson, E. O. P. and O’Donnell, I. J. (1965) Aust. J. Biol. Sci. t8, i2o7--i225
`5 Joubert, F. J., De Jager, p. J. and Swart, L. S. (1968) S~,mposium on Fibrous Proteins, pp.
`343-352, Plenum, New York
`6 Craig, J. M., Goldsmith, L. A. and Baden, H. P. (197o) Pediatrics 40, 437-44°
`7 Crounse, R. G. (~968) Biology of Skin and Hair Growth, pp. 3o7-312, Elsevier, New York
`8 Hirs, C. W. H. (1967) Methods in Enzymology, pp. I99-2o3, Academic Press, New York
`9 Goldsmith, L. A. and Baden, H. P. (I97o) J. Invest. Dermatol. 55, 256 259
`IO Baden, H. P. (I97o) J. Invest. Dermatol. 55, II5-122
`~i Rockland, 1,. B. (196o) Ancd. Chem. 32, 1375 1376
`12 Davis, B. J. (~964) Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sat. I11, 4o4-436
`~3 Baden, H. P. and Goldsmith, L. A. (I97o) Nature 225, Io52-IO53
`14 Gifford, A. M. and Baden, H. P. (197o) J. Invest. DermatoI. 54, 298--3o3
`15 Baden, H. P., Goldsmith, L. A. and Boner, L. C. (1973) J. Invest. DermaloL, in the press
`16 Feughelman, M. and Mitchell, T. "W. (1968) Biopolymers 6, 1515 1518
`17 Baden, H. P. and Goldsmith, L. A. (I972) Clin. Res. 2o, 416
`18 Baden, H. P. and Goldsmith, L. A. (1971) Acla Dermato-Venereol. 5I, 312 316
`19 Sweeney, T. M. and Downing, D. T. (i97o) J. Invest. Dermatol. 55, I39 144
`2o Scheuplein, R. J. and Morgan, L. J. (I967) Nature 2I4, 456 458
`
`Page 10
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket