throbber
Fechrical
`
`Field
`
`of
`
`TECHNICAL FIELD
`
`The present invention relates to a method for detecting pathogenic microorganism
`method for evaluating an effect of an antimicrobial agent on pathogenic
`
`microorganism.tp-particujarrelates_te—anda method for evaluating-an-effect-oftt
`
`an-agentwhereindetecting an antimicrobial agent. The present invention also relates
`to_an antimicrobial agent existiagin-and a therapeutic agent for onychomycosis
`
`which areobtained according,to the above-mentioned method foror evaluating Be
`
`drug effect.
`
`BACKGROUND ART
`
`A method for evaluating a drug effect with an animal model is needed in orderto
`explore a novel antimicrobial agent (also hereinafter “referred to drug"). Further, a
`method forevaluating-enabling a drug effect to be evaluated with accuracy is needed
`because of greatgrate importance in view of predicting a clinical therapeutic efficiency
`thereof.
`
`Historically, an experimental dermatophytosis model that back, planta and interdigital
`| of a guineaguniea pig have beeninfected with Trichophyton mentagrophytes has
`been used in order to evaluate an effect of an antifungal agent on dermatophytosis.
`Such animal models have been already employed to develop some antifungal agent.
`The evaluation of the effect of such antifungal agent is—carried out by applying the
`antifungal agent to the infected animal, byexcising the skin after the certain period of
`time to cut into plural small pieces, bycultivating the skin pieces on the medium, and
`‘by counting the numberof pieces wherein no growth of fungus is seen or the number
`of animals or feet wherein no growth of fungus is seenin all skin pieces, as an
`indicator (Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 36: 2523-2525, 1992, 39: 2353-
`2355, 1995). Hereinafter, the conventional method for evaluating the drug effectis
`referred to as "the conventional method".
`
`Although the drug having a potent activity against Trichophyton in vitro such as
`
`ARGENTUM EX1009
`
`Page 1
`
`

`

`lanoconazole or amorolfine has been marketed in these days, an improvementof cure
`rate in a clinical use is hardly seen, As a main reasonthereof, a relapse that since
`fungusin the skin is not completely killed after a treatment, the fungus grow againis
`pointed.
`
`In also animal experiments, when aneffect of lanoconazole on guipeaguniea pig
`models of tinea pedis was evaluated using the conventional method, though "fungus-
`negative” was observedin all feet out of 20 feet 2 days after the last treatment, a
`relapse was observedin 11 out of 20 feet 30 daysafter the last treatment, and no
`correlation was seen betweenthe effect 2 days after the last treatment and the effect
`30 days after the last treatment (36th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial
`Agents and Chemotherapy, New Orleans, Levisiana-La., 1996, Abstr. F80).
`
`As a reason thereof, there were followings. Since lanoconazole have very potent
`antitrichophyton activity in vitro, lanoconazole persisted in the skin 2 daysafter the
`last treatment in the concentration wherein the sterilization effect was shown.
`Therefore, when the skin is excised and cultivated on the medium to detect fungus,
`the lanoconazole remaining in the skin is diffused in the medium, and therefore, no
`fungus was detected due to prevention of the growth regardless of the presenceof
`viable fungus in the excised skin. On the other hand, since the concentration of the
`drug remainedin the skin is reduced 30 daysafter the last treatment, fungusin the
`skin can grow again and can be detected by culture study.
`
`According to this hypothesis,it is ascertained —-that- the drug remain in the skin
`through the inhibition of the growth of fungus around the skin blocks completely, when
`the lanoconazole-treated skin blocks were located and cultivated on the medium
`which contains dermatophytes.
`
`Therefore, it becameto clear that the conventional method has the problem that the
`
`drug effectcan not se aeelaesa a thenellyIyaa
`
`Page 2
`
`

`

`ar
`ie
`5
`oy
` mathocd
`
`therapeutic effect need to be evaluated after removing the drug remaining in the skin,
`
`is the superficial dermatosis whichis
`Meanwhile, a kind of mycosis. dermatophytosis,
`caused by dermatophyte parasitizing the keratin such as skin (stratum corneum), the
`nail and the hair. In particular, tinea unguium formed in the nail is known as the
`intractable disease among dermatomycoses based on dermatophytoses, and is
`accompanied by symptom such as opacity, tylosis, destruction and deformation of nail
`plate. Now the oral preparation (such as griseofulvin or terbinafine) is used for the
`treatment of such tinea unguium. However, there are many cases wherethe patient
`stops taking the drug or that takes the drug irregularly, since they have to take the
`drug for a long period, for example at least.a half a year in order to completely cure
`tinea unguium. It is thought that this is a main cause of difficulty of curing tinea
`unguium completely. Furthermore, by taking the drug for a long period, griseofulvin
`has the problem of side effects on internal organ (gastrointestinal disorder,
`hepatotoxicity)
`and hepatotoxicity is reported as the side effect in terbinafine.
`Therefore, in order to improve the complianceof the patientit is desired to develop a
`topical preparation which cure tinea unguium for a short period and hasless the
`systemic side effect than the oral preparation.
`
`in case of the simple application on nail plate with the current antifungal
`However,
`agentfor topical use, the antifungal effect on fungus in the nail was not seen, because
`the drug could not sufficiently permeate the thick keratin in nail plate (Markus
`Niewerth and Hans C. Korting, Management of Onychomycoses, Drugs, 58: 283-296,
`1999).
`
`In addition, the therapeutic effect of a topical preparation of antifungal agent on the
`experiment model of trichophytosis can not be evaluated using the conventional
`method as mentioned above. This may be a reason why the drug effect on the guniea
`pig modelof tinea unguium has been hardly reported.
`
`DISCLOSURE OF INVENTION
`
`The present invention has been accomplished based onfindings thatit is desirable
`that an effect of antimicrobial agent such as particularly antifungal agent is evaluated
`after removing a drug remainingin the infected site after treatment of an animal ora
`biosample such as skin with the pathogenic microorganism. An object of the present
`
`Page 3
`
`

`

`invention is to provide a novel method for evaluating the effect of the antimicrobial
`agent and the antimicrobial agent obtained according to the method for evaluating the
`drug effect. In detail, the present invention provides the method for detecting the
`viable pathogenic microorganism in the above-mentioned infected site of the animal
`or the biosample with the pathogenic microorganism after removing the antimicrobial
`agent which has been administered to the animal or the biosample, and the method
`for evaluating the effect of antimicrobial agent which can accurately evaluate the
`effect of the antimicrobial agent without the influence of the antimicrobial agent
`remaining in the infected site of the animal or the biosample with thea pathogenic
`microorganism—ar-. In addition,
`the present invention provides the antimicrobial
`agent obtained according to the above-mentioned the method for evaluating the drug
`effect-efthe—agent, and a-methed-ferthe detecting aa—method of the antimicrobial
`
`seewhereip-an-which sormers2s detecting.the Sxisting satteropial =is.
`
`to which the antimicrobial agentis
`{Mears,
`administered.
`
`In more detail, according to Selve-the
`
`
`
`
`
`erderte-seektoramethodteaccuratelyevaluatethethe present invention a
`detection of a pathogenic microorganism 2and an evaluation of an Steckor an
`
`pilcrogudaciate:absichs-ciereenassont be artied outqe infectingan1 animal ora
`
`biosample with the pathogenic microorganism, administering aathe antimicrobial
`agent comprising a compound having an antimicrobial effect or a- composition thereof
`before or after the infection, then removing the antimicrobial agent, and thereafter
`
`detecting the viable‘pathogenic microorganism in the infected site win the ralfogents
`
`
`‘
`5
`FEE
`delen
`microorganism-+Gta
`
`According to the present invention a detection of Glaira—t+—iriwhichthe—pathegenis
`
`Page 4
`
`antinlaeelal agar
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

` “:
`
`raprsesby infecting 2an1 animal
`ora biosample with a mathgerié microorganism, admteeaie aathe antimicrobial
`agent comprising -a compound -having an antimicrobial effect or a composition
`thereof before or after the infection, —then— excising —the —infected —site -with —the
`pathogenic microorganism, placing and cultivating it on aa-agara medium containing
`ee eaelal EHIeECOECanonY, ang elarCC Otee seeeeeeee:
`
`
`:
`observing a
`arewininhibition ofthe pathoaanie microorganism ebserved-around the infected site
`with the pathogenic microorganism+Claim—++4-
`
`Embed
`
`be =
`
`Additionally, an object of the present invention is to provide the evaluation method of
`a_ drug which enables the effect of an antifungal agent to accurately evaluate in a
`guinea pig model of tinea unquium. Another object of present invention is to provide a
`therapeutic agent for onychomycosis which exhibits the effect on tinea unguium by
`topical applicartion and which is capable of curing tinea unquium shorter period than
`that of the marketed oral preparation due to good permeability, qood retention
`capacity and conservation of high activity in nail plate as well as the potent antifungal
`activity thereof based on the present invention. Another object of the present
`invention is to provide the effective therapeutic agent for onychomycosis exhibiting no
`
`Page 5
`
`

`

`side effect even if therapeutically effective amounts of it are administered sufficiently.
`
`More concretely, the present invention provides a therapeutic agent for
`onychomycosis containing a compound having a formula (1): ##STR1## Wherein
`R.sup.1 and R.sup.2 are the same or different and are hydrogen atom, C.sub.1-6
`alkyl group, a non-substituted aryl group, an aryl group substituted with 1 to 3
`substituents selected from a halogen atom, trifluoromethy! group, nitro group and
`C.sub.1-6 alkyl group, C.sub.2-8 alkenyl group, C.sub.2-6 alkinyl group, or C.sub.7-12
`aralkyl group, m is 2 or 3, nis 1 or 2, [0019] or a salt thereof as active ingredient.
`
`In addition, "presence"includes the mean of "remaining".
`
`BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
`
`As an animal employed in the present invention, there includes mammal such as
`mice, rat, guinea pig or rabbit. As a biosample, there includes a skin of back or planta,
`a nail or the like, which is taken from such animal.
`
`A methodfor infecting such animal or biosample with a pathogenic microorganism
`includes an inoculation percutaneoustypercutaneouslly, orally, intravenously,
`transbronchially, -transnasally- or intraperitoneally. Especially in case of the skin,
`there includes a method for inoculating it on the skin, a method for inoculating on the
`exposed demis, the closed patch method, intracutaneous -injection—orthe-ike-
`
`injection or the like. In case of the nail, there includes a method for inoculating on nail,
`a method in which a skin of the animals’ foot is infected by the above-mentioned
`infecting method to the skin, and thereafter the infection is moved into the nail by
`leaving it for several months.
`
`The term "skin" meansa tissue including the three layers being epidermis, demis and
`subcutaneoustissue, accompanied bypilus (hair), nail, glandulae sebaceae,
`glandulae sudoriferae and glandulae mammaria as appendages.
`
`The epidermmis is separated five layers being stratum corneum, stratum lucidum
`granulosum epidermidis, stratum spinosum, and stratum basale from surface in order.
`
`Page 6
`
`

`

`the stratum lucidum and the stratum granulosum epidermidis is
`The stratum corneum,
`
`referred to as a stratum corneum in a broad sense. Herein. keratin sbustance means
`a part of the above-mentioned stratum corneum.
`
`The term "nail" includes nail plate, nail bed, nail matrix, further side nail wall, posterial
`nail wall, eponychium and hyponychium which make upa tissue around thereof.
`
`In the present invention, the term "pathogenic microorganism" means a
`microorganism which causes human and animal disease in one way or another. An
`example of the pathogenic microorganism (hereinafter referred to "microorganism"is
`bacteria including —aerobic —Gram-negative —bacillus —and —coccus —such— as
`Pseudomonas and Neisseriaceae species; facultative anaerobic Gram-negative
`bacillus such as Eschrichia, Salmonella and Enterobacter species; Gram-positive
`coccus such as Staphylococcus and Streptococcus species. The other examples of
`microorganism are fungi including Hyphomycetes such as Trichophyton, Microsporum
`and Epidermophyton species; Blastomycetes such as Candida and Malassezia;
`Ascomycetes such as Aspergillus species; Zygomycetes such as Mucor species; and
`variants thereof. Examples of such variants are resistant strain which naturally obtains
`drug resistance; auxotrophic mutation strain which comes to have nutritious
`dependency;artificial mutation strain whichis artificially mutated by treatment with
`mutagenic agent; and thelike.
`
`Mycosis means a disease which is caused by invading andproliferating in the tissue
`of human or animal. Usually, mycosis is broadly divided into superficial mycosis and
`deep mycosis. A seat of the diseaselie in the skin or visible mucosa in case of the
`former, in viscus, central nervous system, subcutaneous tissue, muscle, born or
`articulation in case of the latter. Chief example of superficial mycosis is
`dermatophytosis which is caused by infecting with dermatophyte such as
`Trichophyton, Microsporum and &pidermephyterEpidernophyton species, including
`three disease,tinea, tinea favosa and tinea imbricata. Tinea may be conventionally
`employed a synonymouswith dermatophytosis.
`
`In addition, dermatophyte belonging to Trichophyton species is referred usually to as
`trichophytosis.
`
`In the present invention, an antimicrobial agent means a compound having an
`antimicrobial effect or a composition containing the compound. The composition
`includes a preparation form being artificial composition and a natural composition
`such as a natural product.
`
`Page 7
`
`

`

`A methodfor administration of the antimicrobial agent in the present invention
`depends onthe kind thereof and includes topical application, subcutaneous
`administration, oral administration, intravenous administration or the like.
`
`When the method for detecting the pathogenic microorganism, the method for
`evaluating the drug effect and the method for detecting the antimicrobial agent
`according to the present invention is carried out, either an infection with
`microorganism or an administration of the antimicrobial agent may be carried outfirst.
`Especially, in the method for evaluating the drug effect of the present invention
`(hereinafter referred to "the present -evaluation method"), a therapeutic effect of the
`antimicrobial agent can be evaluated in case where the antimicrobial agentis
`administered after the infection with microorganism, meanwhile, thea effect of the
`antimicrobial agent protecting from the infection and the retention capacity thereof can
`be evaluated in case wherethe infection with microorganism is carried out after the
`administration of the antimicrobial agent. In order to evaluateevaluating the retention
`capacity of the antimicrobial agent, the evaluation can be carried out with varying the
`period until infection with microorganism from the administration of the antimicrobial
`agent.
`
`In the present invention, it is preferable to use dialysis orultra filtration for removing
`the antimicrobial agent in view point of simplernessthe usefulness, but notlimited
`thereto as long as a microorganism to be a detecting target or a microorganism used
`in the present evaluation method and thelike is not affected byit.
`
`In dialysis, a marketed dialysis membrane made of cellulose is convenient. A
`membrane made of theother material can be used without -problem, —as -long -as -the
`microarganism -to be the detecting target or the microorganism used -in- the present
`evaluation method and the like can not be passed, and the antimicrobial agent can be
`passed throughit. -Since sizes of most fungi and bacteria are at least 0.2 yra.mu.m, it is
`preferable to use the membrane having less than 0.2 yr.mu.m of the pore size,
`particularly it is suitable to use dialysis membrane having fractional molecular weight of
`1,000 to 50,000._
`
`As eutsideout side solutions usedin dialysis, there include physiological saline,
`distilled water, phosphate buffered physiological saline, theother buffer and thelike.
`
`Page 8
`
`

`

`In removing the antimicrobial agent according to the present invention, even though
`the infected site with the microorganism is the nail, organ or the like as well as the
`skin, the antimicrobial agent can be efficiently removed. Usually, since there is the
`case whereit takes longertime fer-dialysis to remove the antimicrobial agent from nail
`than, skin, the following treatment with digestive enzyme may be carried out before’
`removingit in order to enhance the removaleffect.
`
`Dialysis conditions depend on variety, dose concentration, dose term and the drug
`holidays (the term until evaluation from last day of treatment) of an antimicrobial
`agent. Therefore, it is preferable to previously investigate the dialysis conditions
`enabling the antimicrobial agent to be removed from the treated skin about individual
`cases using the following detecting method of the existing antimicrobial agent in the
`infected site with a microorganism in the present invention (hereinafter referred to "the
`present method for detecting an agent”) to adjust the conditions appropriately.
`
`Whether an antimicrobial agent has been removed can be easily determined using
`the following method.
`
`The present method for detecting an agent is carried out by placing and cultivating
`the infected site with a microorganism which is subjected to the removing method of
`the antimicrobial agent (e.g. an skin piece) or a suspension obtained accordingto the
`following extraction procedure of the microorganism from the above skin piece on an
`agar medium containing the microorganism, and observing a growth inhibition of the
`microorganism found aroundit. -When there is the remaining antimicrobial agent, the
`growth inhibition of the microorganism is observed.
`
`The present evaluation method can be carried out by locating and cultivating, on a
`
`Page 9
`
`

`

`medium, the skin piece in which a removal of an antimicrobial agent has been
`determined using the above--mentioned present method for detecting the agent after
`carrying out the appropriate- removal of the antimicrobial agent and observing
`whether there is a growth of microorganism or not, or by smearing and cultivating a
`suspension obtained -according —to -the- extraction procedure of the microorganism
`from the skin piece on an agar medium and observing whetherthere is the growth of
`microorganism or not or counting colonies emerging on those medium.
`
`A treatment with trypsin can be carried out in order to extract a microorganism
`efficiently from a biosample such as a skin or a nail. Other digestive enzyme than
`trypsin such as pronase orkeratinase, or a keratin resolvent such as urea also can be
`used withoutlimitation to trypsin as long as they have an extraction effect.It is
`necessary to adjust concentrations of the digestive enzyme such astrypsin and
`keratin resolventin a treating solution, and reaction time to no affect range to a
`microorganism. The treatment with digestive enzyme such as trypsin may be carried
`out either before or after dialysis. When the treatment with trypsin is -carried -out
`before dialysis, it is necessary to remove the digestive enzyme suficiently so that the
`microorganism is not affected on dialysis.
`
`As a medium usedfor a cultivation of a microorganism in the present invention, any
`medium can be used aslong asit can be conventionally used for the cultivation and a
`separation of the microorganism. In the-case of fungi, +e-example -of -the -medium
`is Sebouraud medium, modified Sabouraud medium, Czapek agar medium, Potato
`dextrose agar medium orthe like. -On the other hand, inthe case of bacteria,
`example of the medium is Mueller Hinton medium, modified Mueller Hinton medium,
`Heart Infusion agar medium, Brain Heart Infusion agar medium, normal agar medium
`or the like.
`
`A reacting temperature is 10 to 40°.degree. C;., preferably-.20 to 40°.degree. C. A
`microorganism may be cultivated with standing during a sufficient time when the
`microorganism can be grewrAgrowth, for example, 1 to 20 days ferin case of fungi, 1 to
`5 days ferin bacteria.
`
`The present evaluation method car—be utiizedutilizable as ana evaluation method of
`a drug effect in exo vivo which comprisesinfecting a skin, a nail excised from an
`animal body with a microorganism, thereafter administering an antimicrobial agent as
`a test sempeuAdcompound, then removing the antimicrobial agent and detecting and
`determining quantity of the microorganism in the sample.
`
`Page 10
`
`

`

`The present evaluation method also can be applied to an evaluation of an
`antimicrobial agent such as a therapeutic agent for deep mysesisinycosis or an
`antibacterial agent as well as an evaluation of an effect of a therapeutic agent for
`superficial mycosis.-_Thatis to say, it is possible to evaluate an effect of a therapeutic
`agent for deep mycosis or an antibacterial agent by meansof administering an
`antimicrobial agent to an animal infected with a microorganism such as a fungusor a
`bacterium——_byinoculating -percutaneously,-orally, -intravenously, transbronchially,
`
`_transnasally, intraperitoneally, then obtaining biosample such as skin, kidney,
`lung or brain, and detecting the viable microorganism -in the biosample -in which
`removed the remaining: antimicrobial agent -has been removed.
`
`In addition, the present evaluation method enables a quantitative comparison of
`antimicrobial effects by means of determining the numberof viable microorganisms in
`the treated biosample.
`
`That is to say, a significant deference testefsignificance is carried out about the
`numberof microorganisms in the infected site with the microorganism for the treated
`group with drug and for the: reference infected group using a statistical method such
`as Kruskal-Wallis Test, and thereby a quantitative comparison between the groups
`can be done-
`
`
`
` byJ. using a multiple
`
`
`
`test such as Tukey method.
`
`The present invention is useful as either a method for evaluating a drug effect ora
`method for detecting the antimicotics in keratin substance or nail, after administering the
`antifungus to the patient infected with fungus. For example, according to the present
`invention, an effect of an antifungal agent can be evaluated by administeringit to the
`patient-whose skin or nail is infected with fungus, obtaining the keratin substance or
`nail, then removing the above-mentioned antifungal agent, and thereafter detecting the
`viable fungus in the keratin substance or nail. Additionally, according to the present
`invention, a detection of an antifungal agent can be carried out by administeringit to the
`patient whose skin or nail is infected with fungus, then obtaining the keratin substance
`or nail, cultivating it on agar medium containing fungus, and thereafter detecting the
`existing antifungal agent in the keratin substance ornail through a growth inhibition of
`fungus observed around the keratin substance or nail. Such evaluation of an antifungal
`
`Page 11
`
`

`

`agent administered to a patient with fungus and detection of the antifungal agent from
`the keratin substance or nail can be carried out in the same manneras in the above-
`mentioned evaluation method of a drug effect and detecting method of the antimicrobial
`agent administered to an animal or a biosample.
`
`Furthermore, the present invention provides various useful antimicrobial agents
`according to the present evaluation method. As the antimicrobial agent obtained by the
`present evaluation method. there is an antimicrobial agent comprising a compound
`having an eradication effect for microorganism in vivo or a composition for therapy of
`the superficial mycosis, deep mycosis or bacterial infection containing the compound;
`an antimicrobial agent having the true effect selected by means of showing a
`statistically significant effect; furthermore, an antimicrobial agent having an excellent
`eradication effect for microorganism in vivo, which is selected by means-of clarfyingthe
`
`
`
`O
`
`nce
`
`A
`
`cr
`
`r=
`
`yle
`
`a
`
`2
`
`offic
`
`
`KPR-103mentionedbelow.of appearing the pure antimicrobial activity thereof; or an
`
`antimicrobial agent of the complete cure type without relapse. A concrete example is a
`therapeutic agent for onychomycosis comprising a compound having the group
`represented by the above-mentioned formula (I). Among them, more preferable
`concrete example is a therapeutic agent for onychomycosis comprising the compound
`represented by the formula (Il): ##STR2## wherein, Ar is a non-substituted pheny!
`group or a phenyl group substituted with 1 to 3 substituents selected from a halogen
`atom andtrifluoromethyl group, R.sup.1 and R.sup.2 are the sameor different and are
`hydrogen atom, C.sub.1-6 alkyl group, a nori-substituted aryl group, an aryl group
`substituted with 1 to 25 3 substituents selected from a halogen atom, trifluoromethy!
`group, nitro group and C.sub.1-6 all group, C.sub.2-8 alkenyl group, C.sub.2-6 alkinyl
`group, or C.sub.7-12 aralkyl group, mis 2 or 3, nis 1 or 2, X is nitrogen atom or CH,
`and *1 and *2 mean an asymmetric carbon atom.
`
`is a pheny!
`group
`the substituted pheny!
`In the above-mentioned formula(I) or(Il),
`group having 1 to 3 substituents selected from a halogen atom andtrifluoromethyl, and
`includes, for instance, 2,4-difluorophenyl, 2,4-dichlorophenyl, 4-fluorophenyl, 4-
`chlorophenyl, 2-chlorophenyl, 4-trifluoromethylphenyl, 2-chloro-4-fluorophenyl, 4-
`bromopheny| orthe like, C.sub.1-6 alkyl group includes, for example, a straight chain
`branched chain or cyclic alkyl group having 1 to 6 carbon atoms such as methyl, ethyl,
`n-propyl,
`isopropyl, n-butyl, isobutyl, sec-butyl, tert-butyl, n-pentyl, isopentyl, neopenty!
`tert-pentyl and cyclohexyl. The non-substituted aryl group includes, for example, phenyl.
`naphthyl, biphenyl or the like. The substituted aryl group includes, for example, 2.4-
`difluorophenyl, 2.4-dichlorophenyl, 4-fluorophenyl, 4-chlorophenyl, 2-chlorophenyl, 4-
`trifluoromethylphenyl, 2-chloro-4-fluorophenyl, 4-bromophenyl, 4-tert-butylphenyl, 4-
`nitrophenyl or the like. C.sub.2-8 alkenyl group includes, for example, vinyl, 1-propeny!
`
`Page 12
`
`

`

`styryl or the like. C.sub.2-6 alkynyl group includes, for example, ethynyl or thelike.
`C.sub.7-12 aralkyl group includes, for example, benzyl, naphthylmethyl, 4-nitrobenzy! or
`the like.
`
`In addition, the most preferable compound among the above-mentioned antimicrobial
`agent includes the compound which showsthe therapeutic efficiency like the following
`KP-103.
`
`The above-mentioned KP-103 means an antifungal indicated by (2R,3R)-2-(2,4-
`
`
`difluorophenyl)-3-(4-methylenepiperidine-1-yl)-1-(1 H-1,2,4-triazole-1-yl)butane-2-ol.
`The compound can be prepared by allowing (2R,3S)-2-(2,4-difluoropheny!)-3-methyl-2-
`[(1H-1,2,4-triazole-1-— yl)methylloxirane to react with 4-methylenepiperidine based on
`Example 1 in WO94/26734.
`
`An effectiveness of the KP-103 used as an antifungal in the present invention for
`onychomycosis has not been confirmed, but its antifungal activity has been already
`known (W0O94/26734).
`
`The antimicrobial agent obtained in such mannercan belo used as a drug
`composition, the drug composition in orderto sterilize a microorganism. In other
`words, it comes to be a drug composition which cures disease such as mycosis
`completely, and prevents a relapse.
`
`EXAMPLE
`
`Onychomycosis means a kind of the above-mentioned superficial mycosis, in the
`other word a disease which is caused by invading andproliferating in the nail of
`human or an animal. Trichophyton rubrum and Trichophyton mentagrophytes mainly
`cause onychomycosis in human. In rare case, Microsporum, Epidernophyton,
`Candida, Aspergillus or Fusarium causesit.
`
`As a disease which is susceptible to treat with a therapeutic agents for
`onychomycosis of the present invention, there is included tinea unguium caused by
`Trichophyton species, Onychocandidasis caused by Candida species or
`onychomycosis (sensu stricto) caused by the other fungus.
`
`Whena therapeutic agent for onychomycosis being a kind of antimicrobial agent in
`the present invention is given as topical preparation,
`thereis liquid preparation
`cream, ointoment or manicure preparation as dosage form. In this case,
`it can be
`prepared using oil vehicle, emulsion vehicle or the like. The preferable amount of
`
`Page 13
`
`

`

`active ingredientis in 0.1 to 10% by weight. A dose amount may be appropriately
`aligned depending on the width of affected area and condition of disease.
`
`tablet, granule, capsule or syrup.
`In case of an oral preparation,it is used as powder,
`In addition,
`it is used in form of injection such as subcutaneousinjection
`intramuscular injection or intravenousinjection.
`
`In the present invention, although the dosage amountof a therapeutic agent for
`onychomycosis depends on age, weight and individual conditions of a patient, it is
`about 10 mg to about 10 g per day, preferably about 50 mg to about 5 g as amountof
`the active ingredient. The agent was given in the above-mentioned daily dose at once
`or several
`divided
`portions.
`
`The present invention is further explained in details based on the Examples
`hereinafter, but is not limited thereto.
`
`PRETREATMENT OF COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 1 AND EXAMPLES 1 TO 3
`
`[1] Preparation of Fungal Solution and Production of a Guinea Pig Model of Interdigital
`Type of Tinea Pedis.
`
`Millipore Filter (made by Millipore Corporation, HA, diameter 47 mm, 0.45 ,A.mu.m)
`was-placed on Brain-Heart-infusion agar medium (available from Nissui Pharmaceutical
`Co., LTD.), and 46®10.sup.6 cells of microcondium of Trichophyton mentagrophytes KD-
`04 strain were applied thereon. The cultivation was carried out at 30°.degree. C. under
`17-% of SO,.CO.sub.2 for 7days/days. After the cultivation, ana—apprepriatejust amount of
`physiological saline containing 0.05-% of Tween 80 was dropped onthe filter and
`arthroconidia were collected using a platinum loop. After a hyphal mass was removed
`by a filtration with a sterile gauze, the numberof arthroconidia —in- the —arthreseridia
`
`suspension—filtrate was calculated —by hemocytometerto adjust in concentration of 1x
`40*times.10.sup.8 arthroconidia+/ml to obtain a fungal inocula._
`
`A guinea pig modelof interdigital type of tinea pedis was prepared according to the
`method of Arika et al (Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 36: 2523-2525, 1992).
`Concretely, in -two- hind foots of male Hartley strain guinea pigs of 7 weeks age, the
`interdigital skin was lightly abraded -with sandpaper. A paper disc (AAdisc available
`
`from Whatmen International Ltd cut in 8<.times.4 mm) moisten with the above-
`mentioned solution of the inoculated organism was applied onto the region between the
`interdigital toes of the hind feet and fixed using Self-adhering-Foam Pad (Restone
`1560M; available from 3M) and adhesive stretch bandage (ELASTPORE; available from
`
`ee
`
`Page 14
`
`

`

`Nichiban Co., Ltd). The paper disc and the bandage were -removed seven daysafter of
`the infection.
`
`tepicaltreatmentTopical Treatment
`
`[2]Preparation of drug-selutioaDrug-Solution and
`
`
`for guinea-pigmodelcHnterdigitaltypethe Guinea Pig Modelof tinea-pedis
`
`Interdigital Type of Tinea Pedis
`
`A marketed 1-% lanoconazole solution (commercial name: Astat (trade name)
`
`oesaea oatralines ki103aietaeee
`
`
`deseribed_in-Example_tinWO-94/26734}was solved ina concentration af 1% in
`polyethylene glycelgrycole #400-: ethanol (75—:25 v/v) mixture were used astest
`substance. Each solution in-an amountof 0.1 ml was applied to the plantar skin once
`a day from 10 days after the infection for 10 days.
`
`COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE1
`
`Conventional methedMethod for evaluating-drug-effect
`
`Evaluating Drug Effect
`
`The conventional method wasdescribed asfollows.- For the infected control group
`without an application of the drug, the KP-103-treated group and the lanoconazole-
`treated group, 10 guinea pigs (hereinafter referred to "animal") were employed,
`respectively. Animals of each group were sacrificed two days after and 30 days after the
`last treatment. Their two hind feet were excised and wiped with the cotton swabsweb
`containing alcohol sufficiently. A skin of whole sole was excised and cut into 15 skin
`pieces in total inclu

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket