Facebook, Inc. and WhatsApp, Inc.
`(Petitioners)
`v.
`Uniloc USA, Inc. and Uniloc Luxembourg S.A.
`(Patent Owner)
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`1
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 1
`
`
`(Petitioners)
`v.
`Uniloc USA, Inc. and Uniloc Luxembourg S.A.
`(Patent Owner)
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`1
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 1
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01428 (Patent 8,995,433)
`Claims 9-12, 14-17, 25 and 26
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`2
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 2
`
`
`
`Claim Construction
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`3
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 3
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent 8,995,433,
`Ex. 1001
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`4
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 4
`
`
`
`“instant voice message”
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`5
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 5
`
`
`
`Zydney’s voice container discloses an “instant voice message”
`
`Petition
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`Petition at 24-25
`
`6
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 6
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s proposal: “audio file voice recording data”
`
`• Not required by specification
`
`• Excludes embodiments
`
`• Contrary to Patent Owner’s related patent with
`same written description
`
`• Not required by claims
`
`Petitioner Reply
`(Paper 29)
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`Reply at 2-5
`
`7
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 7
`
`
`
`“Audio File Voice Recording Data” Not Required by Specification
`
`• Specification describes “intercom mode” in which an “instant voice message”
`is a buffered transmission not an audio file
`
`Petitioner Reply
`(Paper 29)
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`Reply at 4-5; Zydney (Ex. 1001) at 11:34-60
`
`8
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 8
`
`
`
`“Audio File Voice Recording Data” Excludes Embodiments
`
`• Dependent claim 13 recites “instant voice message” generated using
`“intercom mode”
`
`Petitioner Reply
`(Paper 29)
`
`A “claim construction that excludes a preferred embodiment . . . is rarely, if ever
`correct and would require highly persuasive evidentiary support.”
`Epos Techs. Ltd. v. Pegasus Techs. Ltd., 766 F.3d 1338, 1347 (Fed. Cir. 2014) (quoting Anchor Wall
`Sys., Inc. v. Rockwood Retaining Walls, Inc., 340 F.3d 1298, 1308 (Fed. Cir. 2003))
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`Reply at 5
`
`9
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 9
`
`
`
`Related Uniloc ’747 Patent confirms “instant voice message”
`not synonymous with “audio file recording voice data”
`
`•
`
`’747 Patent, claim 1:
`
`Petitioner Reply
`(Paper 29)
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`Reply at 3; U.S. Patent No. 8,199,747, claim 1
`
`10
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 10
`
`
`
`“Audio File Voice Recording Data” Not Required by Claims
`
`• Claim steps of playing or recording do not limit to only “audio file”
`
`• Claims recite that a “file” can be attached to an instant voice message,
`suggesting that the instant voice message need not be a “file”
`
`Petitioner Reply
`(Paper 29)
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`Reply at 2-3
`
`11
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 11
`
`
`
`“instant voice messaging application”
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`12
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 12
`
`
`
`Broadest reasonable construction in context of claims of ’433 patent is
`“hardware and/or software used for instant voice messaging”
`
`IVM client 208, a “general-purpose
`programmable computer”
`
`Petition
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`Petition at 10-12; ’433, Fig. 3, 12:6-16
`
`13
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 13
`
`
`
`• Petitioner agrees with Board that no construction is necessary to
`show that Zydney discloses the “instant voice messaging application”
`
`DI (Paper 8) at 7
`
`Institution Decision
`(Paper 8)
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`14
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 14
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s dispute about including “hardware” in
`broadest reasonable interpretation is irrelevant
`
`• Petition mapped “instant messaging application” to Zydney’s software
`agent and features and functionality of its associated software components
`
`Petitioner Reply
`(Paper 29)
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`• Patent Owner has not pointed to any place where Petitioner relied on
`hardware functionality as disclosing the claimed instant messaging application
`
`Reply at 10-11; Petition at 23
`
`15
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 15
`
`
`
`“client platform system”
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`16
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 16
`
`
`
`Broadest reasonable construction is “hardware and/or software
`on a client for generating an instant voice message”
`
`• As part of the “instant messaging application,” “client platform system”
`under its broadest reasonable construction should similarly be defined
`as hardware and/or software
`
`Petition
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`Petition at 13-14
`
`17
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 17
`
`
`
`• Petitioner agrees with Board that no construction is necessary to
`show that Zydney discloses the “client platform system”
`
`DI (Paper 8) at 7
`
`Institution Decision
`(Paper 8)
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`18
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 18
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s dispute about including “hardware” in
`broadest reasonable interpretation is immaterial
`
`• Petition mapped “client platform system" to components of Zydney’s
`software agent:
`
`Petitioner Reply
`(Paper 29)
`
`• Patent Owner has not pointed to any place where Petitioners relied on
`hardware functionality as disclosing the claimed client platform system
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`Reply at 10-11; Petition at 27
`
`19
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 19
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s cited specification passage is not definitional
`
`Petitioner Reply
`(Paper 29)
`
`“To act as its own lexicographer, a patentee must ‘clearly set forth a definition
`of the disputed claim term’ other than its plain and ordinary meaning.”
`Thorner v. Sony Computer Entm’t Am. LLC, 669 F.3d 1362, 1365 (Fed. Cir. 2012)
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`Reply at 10-11; ’433, 12:6-23
`
`20
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 20
`
`
`
`Zydney discloses “client platform system”
`even under Patent Owner’s proposed construction
`
`Petition
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`Petition at 27-28
`
`21
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 21
`
`
`
`Independent Claim 9
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`22
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 22
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent 8,995,433,
`Ex. 1001
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`23
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 23
`
`
`
`Zydney discloses “attach[ing] one or more
`messages to the instant voice message”
`
`• Patent Owner’s argument relies on incorrect claim interpretation that a voice
`container is not an “instant voice message”:
`
`Petition
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`Petition at 32-36; Zydney, 19:1-7; Patent Owner Response at 21
`
`24
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 24
`
`
`
`Claim 17
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`25
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 25
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent 8,995,433,
`Ex. 1001
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`26
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 26
`
`
`
`Board correctly found no support in claims or specification
`for Patent Owner’s “separateness” requirement
`
`Petitioner Reply
`(Paper 29)
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`•
`
`“Receiving the Instant Voice Message and an Indication . . .” is properly
`left to its plain meaning
`
`Reply at 6; DI at 9-10
`
`27
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 27
`
`
`
`Claim 26
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`28
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 28
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent 8,995,433,
`Ex. 1001
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`29
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 29
`
`
`
`Zydney central server “delivers the instant voice message
`to the one or more intended recipients who are determined
`to be currently available”
`
`Petition
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`Petition at 48; Zydney at 16:7-12, 12:18-23
`
`30
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 30
`
`
`
`Board correctly found no requirement that the data format
`of the instant voice message must remain identical
`
`Petitioner Reply
`(Paper 29)
`
`A “claim construction that excludes a preferred embodiment . . . is rarely, if ever
`correct and would require highly persuasive evidentiary support.”
`Epos Techs. Ltd. v. Pegasus Techs. Ltd., 766 F.3d 1338, 1347 (Fed. Cir. 2014) (quoting Anchor Wall
`Sys., Inc. v. Rockwood Retaining Walls, Inc., 340 F.3d 1298, 1308 (Fed. Cir. 2003))
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`Reply at 12-13; DI at 16-17
`
`31
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 31
`
`
`
`Claims 11, 15 & 16
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`32
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 32
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent 8,995,433,
`Ex. 1001
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`33
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 33
`
`
`
`• Sending user could enter herself as among the recipients who will receive a
`message, a practice Greenlaw expressly encourages
`
`Petition
`
`• Sending user could then view attachment or use controls to play, review or
`delete the instant voice message, as claimed
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`Petition at 53-59; Greenlaw (Ex. 1010) at 19, 21
`
`34
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 34
`
`
`
`Board correctly found that the claims do not
`require “display” before sending message
`Claim 11:
`
`Claim 15:
`
`Claim 16:
`
`Institution Decision
`(Paper 8)
`
`“[I]t is important not to import into a claim limitations that are not a part of the claim.”
`Electro Med. Sys. S.A. v. Cooper Life Sci., Inc., 34 F.3d 1048, 1054 (Fed. Cir. 1994)
`DI at 17-19; Reply at 13-16
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`35
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 35
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01667 (Patent 8,724,622)
`Claims 3, 6-8, 10, 11, 13, 14-23, 27-35, 38 and 39
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`36
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 36
`
`
`
`Claim Construction
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`37
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 37
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent 8,724,622,
`Ex. 1001
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`38
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 38
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent 8,724,622,
`Ex. 1001
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`39
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 39
`
`
`
`Institution Decision,
`Paper 8
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`DI at 9
`
`40
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 40
`
`
`
`Claim 3
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`41
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 41
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent 8,724,622,
`Ex. 1001
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`42
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 42
`
`
`
`Reply (Paper 24)
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`Reply at 11-12
`
`43
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 43
`
`
`
`Petition
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`Petition at 32
`
`44
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 44
`
`
`
`Petition
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`Petition at 32-33
`
`45
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 45
`
`
`
`Petition
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`Petition at 33
`
`46
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 46
`
`
`
`Petition
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`Lavian Decl. (Ex. 1002) at ¶ 143
`
`47
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 47
`
`
`
`Institution Decision
`(Paper 8)
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`DI at 20
`
`48
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 48
`
`
`
`Claim 27
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`49
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 49
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent 8,724,622,
`Ex. 1001
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`50
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 50
`
`
`
`Petition
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`Petition at 54
`
`51
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 51
`
`
`
`Petition
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`Petition at 54
`
`52
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 52
`
`
`
`Petition
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`Petition at 55-56
`
`53
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 53
`
`
`
`Petition
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`Petition at 56
`
`54
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 54
`
`
`
`Claims 14-17, 28-31
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`55
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 55
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent 8,724,622,
`Ex. 1001
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`56
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 56
`
`
`
`Clark,
`Ex. 1008
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`Clark, Fig 4A, 9:11-15, 11:50-54; Petition at 59-61
`
`57
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 57
`
`
`
`Petitioners’ Reply
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`Clark, Fig 5A; Petition at 59, 61 (“StoreMessageID”), Reply at 20-22
`
`58
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 58
`
`
`
`Motivation to combine Zydney and Clark
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`Petition at 62
`
`59
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 59
`
`
`
`Motivation to combine Zydney and Clark (continued)
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`Petition at 62
`
`60
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 60
`
`
`
`Claims 38-39
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`61
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 61
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent 8,724,622,
`Ex. 1001
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`62
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 62
`
`
`
`Petition
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`Petition at 57
`
`63
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 63
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent 8,724,622,
`Ex. 1001
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`64
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 64
`
`
`
`Appelman,
`Ex. 1004
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`Petition at 69-75, citing Appelman Fig. 3 (annotation added)
`
`65
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 65
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01668 (Patent 8,724,622)
`Claims 4, 5, 12 and 24-26
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`66
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 66
`
`
`
`Claim Construction
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`67
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 67
`
`
`
`Institution Decision,
`Paper 8
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`DI at 9
`
`68
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 68
`
`
`
`Claims 4, 5, 12
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`69
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 69
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent 8,724,622,
`Ex. 1001
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`70
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 70
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent 8,724,622,
`Ex. 1001
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`71
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 71
`
`
`
`Petition
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`72
`
`Petition at 37-39; Lavian Decl. (Ex. 1101) at ¶ 306-309; Hethmon (Ex. 1109) at 54 (annotations added)
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 72
`
`
`
`Petition
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`73
`
`Petition at 37-39; Lavian Decl. (Ex. 1101) at ¶ 309; Hethmon (Ex. 1109) at 78 (annotations added)
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 73
`
`
`
`Petition
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`Petition at 39
`
`74
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 74
`
`
`
`Petition
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`Petition at 40
`
`75
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 75
`
`
`
`Petition
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`Petition at 41, 42
`
`76
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 76
`
`
`
`Lavian Decl. (Ex. 1101)
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`Lavian Decl. (Ex. 1101) at ¶ 319; Petition at 44-45
`
`77
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 77
`
`
`
`Claims 24-26
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`78
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 78
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent 8,724,622,
`Ex. 1001
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`79
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 79
`
`
`
`Petition
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`Petition at 46-47
`
`80
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 80
`
`
`
`Petition
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`Petition at 47-48
`
`81
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 81
`
`
`
`Petition
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`Hethmon at 78; Petition at 48; Reply at 15-16
`
`82
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 82
`
`
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibit
`
`83
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1118
`IPR2017-01428 - Page 83
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
