throbber

`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________
`
`
`VISIONSENSE CORP.
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`NOVADAQ TECHNOLOGIES INC.
`Patent Owner.
`
`Patent No. 8,892,190
`
`
`_______________
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review No. IPR2017-01426
`____________________________________________________________
`
`DECLARATION OF BRIAN WILSON
`
`
`
`
`va-501433
`
` 1
`
`
`
`Novadaq Technologies Inc. Exhibit 2002 Page 1
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01426
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I. PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND .................................................................. 3
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`II.
`
`BASIS FOR OPINION .................................................................................... 5
`
`III.
`
`Little ................................................................................................................. 6
`
`IV. CONCLUSION ..............................................................................................12
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`va-501433
`
` 2
`
`
`
`Novadaq Technologies Inc. Exhibit 2002 Page 2
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01426
`
`
`
`
`
`I, Brian Wilson, Ph.D., declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I have been retained as an expert on behalf of Novadaq Technologies
`
`Inc., in the above-captioned Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 8,892,190
`
`(“the ’190 patent”). I have been asked to provide my opinions and views on the
`
`Little prior art (Ex. 1002) cited in the Petition for Inter Partes Review of the ’190
`
`Patent filed by Visionsense Corp.
`
`I.
`
`PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND
`
`2.
`
`I am a medical biophysicist with more than 40 years of experience in
`
`the field.
`
`3.
`
`I obtained a Ph.D. in experimental physics from the University of
`
`Glasgow in 1971.
`
`4. My professional experience has included three years at the Institute of
`
`Cancer Research at the Royal Marsden Hospital in the United Kingdom, from 1972
`
`to 1974, engaged in the study of radiological physics, imaging and therapeutics. I
`
`subsequently spent seven years as a medical physicist, including five years as
`
`Assistant Professor of Diagnostic Radiology at Flinders University Medical Center
`
`in Australia, from 1974 to 1981. I then became the Head of Medical Physics at the
`
`Hamilton Cancer Centre at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada,
`
`first as an Associate Professor and then as a Full Professor, from 1981 to 1993. In
`
`
`va-501433
`
` 3
`
`
`
`Novadaq Technologies Inc. Exhibit 2002 Page 3
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01426
`
`
`
`my capacity at McMaster University, I established a research program in
`
`Biomedical Optics, including Optical Imaging and Therapeutics.
`
`5.
`
`I am currently a Senior Scientist at University Health Network and
`
`Professor of Medical Biophysics in the Faculty of Medicine at University of
`
`Toronto in Toronto, Canada. I have been in this position since 1993. I lead a
`
`translational research program in the application of optics-based techniques to
`
`human imaging and treatment. I also co-direct the Advanced Optical Microscopy
`
`Facility at the University Health Network, which is an association of several major
`
`teaching hospitals of the University of Toronto, along with their associated
`
`research institutes.
`
`6.
`
`I have published more than 370 peer-reviewed scientific papers, of
`
`which more than 300 are in the area of biomedical optics and its applications.
`
`7.
`
`Biomedical optics is defined as the use of light and optical
`
`technologies for applications in the life sciences and clinical medicine. This
`
`includes optical imaging, image-guided therapeutics and light-based treatments,
`
`including the use of lasers.
`
`8.
`
`I have extensive experience in fluorescence imaging in a wide variety
`
`of applications. Examples include the use of high-resolution fluorescence
`
`microscopy for cellular imaging and for imaging tissue vasculature and tissue
`
`function, the use of fluorescent nanoparticles and other fluorescence agents for
`
`
`va-501433
`
` 4
`
`
`
`
`
`Novadaq Technologies Inc. Exhibit 2002 Page 4
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01426
`
`
`
`
`
`tissue contrast, the use of fluorescence endoscopy using autofluorescence of tissues
`
`and fluorescent dyes for cancer imaging, and the design and construction of
`
`fluorescence imaging systems for intraoperative use in guiding surgery.
`
`9. My professional work has involved the development of wide field of
`
`view fluorescence imaging systems for intraoperative use in guiding brain surgery.
`
`10.
`
`I am being compensated at an hourly rate by the Patent Owner for my
`
`assistance in connection with the above-captioned inter partes review proceeding,
`
`and all activities in connection with the preparation of this declaration. I am being
`
`paid regardless of the conclusions or opinions I reach. I have no personal financial
`
`stake or interest in the outcome of the present inter partes review.
`
`II. BASIS FOR OPINION
`
`11. My opinions and views set forth in this report are based on my
`
`education, training, and experience in the relevant field, as well as the materials I
`
`reviewed in this case, and the scientific knowledge regarding the same subject
`
`matter that existed prior to the earliest effective filing date of the ’190 patent.
`
`
`va-501433
`
` 5
`
`
`
`Novadaq Technologies Inc. Exhibit 2002 Page 5
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01426
`
`
`
`III. LITTLE1
`
`12. Little discloses performing fluorescein dye based angiography during
`
`bypass surgery on the brain to assess the success of a superficial temporal artery
`
`(STA) to middle cerebral artery (MCA) anastomosis. (Ex. 1002 at 560.)
`
`13. Little describes the anastomosis procedure as follows:
`
`An inverted U-shaped scalp flap was turned. The larger STA
`
`branch, together with a generous cuff of connective tissue, was
`
`mobilized carefully. A relatively large temporoparietal
`
`craniotomy was performed. The largest exposed cortical artery,
`
`usually the angular branch of the MCA, was selected as the
`
`receptor vessel. Mean STA diameter was 1.3 mm (range: 0.9 to
`
`1.6 mm) and mean receptor artery diameter was 1.2 mm (range:
`
`0.9 to 1.6- mm). Continuous suturing11 was performed for the
`
`anastomosis in all but the initial three patients, in whom the
`
`standard interrupted suture technique was used. The operations
`
`were carried out by one surgeon (J.R.L.).
`
`(Id. at 562.) Based on the operative procedure described in Little, the MCA was
`
`thus selected as the receptor vessel and the STA was selected as the vessel graft
`
`
`1 The copy of Little provided by the Petitioner as Exhibit 1002 includes poor
`
`quality images. Accordingly, Patent Owner provided me a copy of Little scanned
`
`at higher resolution but otherwise identical. The images of Little reproduced
`
`within are from the higher resolution copy, which is cited as Ex. 2001.
`
`
`va-501433
`
` 6
`
`
`
`
`
`Novadaq Technologies Inc. Exhibit 2002 Page 6
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01426
`
`
`
`
`
`(i.e., the vessel that is implanted into the subject). The STA was anastomosed to
`
`the MCA to bypass blockage in the upstream internal carotid artery or upstream
`
`portion of the MCA. (Id. at 560.)
`
`14. Little provides a white-light image of a surgical site after anastomosis
`
`of the STA vessel graft to the MCA receptor vessel in the upper left image of
`
`Figure 1. (Id. at 563.) The caption of Figure 1 explains that in this image, the STA
`
`is covered by “a generous cuff of connective tissue and fat (X).” (Id.) The upper
`
`left image of Figure 1 is provided below with annotations.
`
`
`va-501433
`
` 7
`
`
`
`
`
`Novadaq Technologies Inc. Exhibit 2002 Page 7
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01426
`
`
`
`
`
`(Ex. 2001 at Figure 1 (annotation added).) The above annotation of this image
`
`outlines the cuff of connective tissue and fat to help illustrate the location of the
`
`STA, which as explained in Little, is covered by the cuff of connective tissue and
`
`fat. That portion of the image was marked with an “X” in Little itself. The STA
`
`vessel graft is not visible in this image due to the covering of connective tissue and
`
`fat. The same is true of the white-light images in Figures 2 through 4.
`
`15. Little describes that fluorescence imaging was performed to assess the
`
`success of the anastomosis procedure. (Ex. 1002 at 564.) The remaining five
`
`images in Figure 1 are fluorescence images showing the movement of fluorescent
`
`dye through the vessel to which the vessel graft is attached and downstream
`
`vasculature. (Ex. 1002 at Figure 1 caption.)
`
`16. The top right image of Figure 1, bearing the time stamp of 01:13
`
`provides an example of the lack of fluorescence response in the area of the STA
`
`vessel graft. This image is reproduced below.
`
`
`va-501433
`
` 8
`
`
`
`Novadaq Technologies Inc. Exhibit 2002 Page 8
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01426
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Ex. 2001 at Figure 1 (annotated).) The caption of Figure 1 explains that the white
`
`area (indicated by the arrow in the above annotation) illustrates “filling of the
`
`cortical receptor artery.” (Ex. 1002 at Figure 1 caption.)
`
`17. As explained by Little in the description of the operative procedure,
`
`the “largest exposed cortical artery, usually the angular branch of the MCA, was
`
`selected as the receptor vessel.” (Ex. 1002 at 562 (emphasis added.) Therefore,
`
`the “cortical receptor artery” mentioned in the caption of Figure 1 is the MCA.
`
`Thus, one of ordinary skill in the art would understand that the portion of the upper
`
`right image of Figure 1 of Little (reproduced above) shows fluorescence response
`
`of the blood flow in the MCA receptor vessel.
`
`
`va-501433
`
` 9
`
`
`
`Novadaq Technologies Inc. Exhibit 2002 Page 9
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01426
`
`
`
`
`
`18. Because of the covering by the cuff of connective tissue and fat, the
`
`STA vessel graft is not shown in the upper right image of Figure 1 of Little. The
`
`central portion of the image—the location of the cuff of connective tissue and fat
`
`covering the STA vessel graft—is completely dark.
`
`19.
`
`In the other four fluorescence images of Figure 1 of Little,
`
`fluorescence radiation in the MCA receptor vessel and downstream vessels is
`
`captured, but blood flow within the STA vessel graft is completely obscured by the
`
`cuff of connective tissue and fat. (Id.) The lower central portion of each image—
`
`the location of the cuff covering the STA—is completely dark.
`
`20. The center right image of Figure 1 of Little provides a stark example
`
`of the lack of fluorescence response in the area of the STA vessel graft. The below
`
`annotation of the center right image of Figure 1 includes an arrow indicating the
`
`dark area in the center of the image to illustrate the lack of imaging of the STA
`
`vessel graft.
`
`
`va-501433
`
` 10
`
`
`
`Novadaq Technologies Inc. Exhibit 2002 Page 10
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01426
`
`
`
`
`
`(Ex. 2001 at Figure 1.) In the above image, fluorescence radiation emitted from
`
`areas downstream of the anastomosis is captured, as indicated by the light-colored
`
`areas. But, no fluorescence radiation has been captured in the area of the STA
`
`vessel graft, as indicated by the darkness in the area corresponding to the cuff of
`
`connective tissue and fat.
`
`21. Little provides images for three other surgical procedures in Figures 2
`
`through 4. Each of the procedures depicted in the figures of Little included a cuff
`
`of connective tissue and fat over the STA that prevented detection of any
`
`fluorescence signal from dye within the STA. (Id. at 564-66.) While the image on
`
`
`va-501433
`
` 11
`
`
`
`
`
`Novadaq Technologies Inc. Exhibit 2002 Page 11
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01426
`
`
`
`
`
`the right in Figure 4 includes some fluorescence signal in the vicinity of the cuff,
`
`the caption of Figure 4 explains that this is due to leakage of the fluorescein dye
`
`into the walls of the STA and the surrounding tissue and is not radiation from dye
`
`within the STA. (Ex. 1002at 566.)
`
`22. Little therefore includes images that show blood flow in the MCA
`
`receptor vessel to which the vessel graft is attached and in downstream vessels, but
`
`none of the images shows blood flow in the STA vessel graft itself. The STA
`
`vessel graft was covered with a layer of tissue and fat that prevented imaging of the
`
`blood flow within the STA vessel graft.
`
`IV. CONCLUSION
`
`23.
`
`I hereby declare that all statements made herein of my own
`
`knowledge are true, and that all statements made on information and belief are
`
`believed to be true, and that these statements were made with knowledge that
`
`willful false statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or
`
`imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. § 1001.
`
`Dated: August 22, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`va-501433
`
`Brian Wilson
`
`
`
` 12
`
`
`
`Novadaq Technologies Inc. Exhibit 2002 Page 12
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket