throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2017-01406
`U.S. Patent No. 7,673,072
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`________________
`
`INTEL CORP., CAVIUM, INC.,
`WISTRON CORPORATION, and DELL INC.
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`ALACRITECH, INC.,
`Patent Owner
`________________
`
`Case IPR2017-014061
`U.S. Patent No. 7,673,072
`________________
`
`
`
`
`
`UNOPPOSED PATENT OWNER ALACRITECH, INC.'S MOTION FOR
`ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE OF ANTONIO SISTOS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 Cavium, Inc., which filed a Petition in Case IPR2017-01718, Wistron
`Corporation, which filed a Petition in Case IPR2018-00327, and Dell Inc., which
`filed a Petition in Case IPR2018-00371, have been joined as petitioners in this
`proceeding.
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2017-01406
`U.S. Patent No. 7,673,072
`
`Exhibit List
`
`Exhibit Name
`
`Declaration of Antonio Sistos in support
`of Alacritech
`Inc.’s Motion
`for
`Admission Pro Hac Vice of Antonio
`Sistos
`
`Exhibit #
`
`2700
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2017-01406
`U.S. Patent No. 7,673,072
`
`Patent Owner Alacritech, Inc. (“Alacritech”) respectfully requests that the
`
`Board recognize Antonio Sistos, Esq. as pro hac vice counsel for Alacritech in this
`
`proceeding. Petitioner has indicated that it does not oppose this motion.
`
`I.
`
` BACKGROUND
`
`Alacritech’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission is being filed pursuant to
`
`and in compliance with the Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition and Time
`
`Period for Filing Patent Owner Preliminary Response, which was filed June 5,
`
`2017 (Paper 6) (the “Notice”). The Notice authorizes parties to file motions for
`
`pro hac vice admission under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c). Further to the Notice, such
`
`“motions shall be filed in accordance with the ‘Order– Authorizing Motion for Pro
`
`Hac Vice Admission’ in Case IPR2013-00639” (the “Order”).
`
`II. TIME OF FILING
`
`This Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission is being filed in accordance with
`
`the Notice Authorizing the Filing of a Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission, and is
`
`filed greater than 21 days after that Notice.
`
`III. STATEMENT OF FACTS
`
`As required by the Order, the following statement of facts, supported by the
`
`attached Declaration of Antonio Sistos in Support of Motion for Pro Hac Vice
`
`Admission (Ex. 2700), shows that there is good cause for the Patent Trial and
`
`Appeal Board (“Board”) to recognize Mr. Sistos pro hac vice in this proceeding.
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2017-01406
`U.S. Patent No. 7,673,072
`
`As required by 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), Alacritech’s lead counsel, James M. Glass, is
`
`a registered practitioner experienced in proceedings before the USPTO.
`
`Mr. Sistos is an experienced litigation attorney. Mr. Sistos has been
`
`litigating cases for more than 13 years, and has been involved in numerous patent
`
`litigation cases in federal courts. Mr. Sistos’s experience includes representing a
`
`wide range of clients in complex intellectual property and commercial litigation in
`
`various Appellate and District Courts. This will be Mr. Sistos’s first appearance
`
`pro hac vice before the Board. Mr. Sistos is a member in good standing of the
`
`California State Bar, with no suspensions or disbarments from practice, nor any
`
`application for admission to practice denied, nor any sanctions or contempt
`
`citations. Additionally, Mr. Sistos is admitted to practice in the United States
`
`District Court, Northern District of California. His mailing address is: Quinn
`
`Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, 50 California Street, Floor 22, San Francisco,
`
`California 94111. His email address is: antoniosistos@quinnemanuel.com, and his
`
`direct dial is: (415) 875-6334.
`
`Mr. Sistos has worked with lead counsel in most aspects of his participation
`
`in this proceeding. As such, he has reviewed and is very familiar with (i) U.S.
`
`Patent No. 7,673,072, the patent at issue in this proceeding, (ii) the prior art relied
`
`upon by Petitioner, (iii) the legal and factual arguments made by Petitioner in both
`
`its Petition for inter partes review and in the supporting declaration of Dr. Horst
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2017-01406
`U.S. Patent No. 7,673,072
`
`(Ex. 1003), as well as the legal and factual arguments addressed by Alacritech in
`
`its Patent Owner Response; and (iv) the developments and relevant briefs in this
`
`proceeding since Petitioner filed its Petition, as well as the developments in related
`
`matters before the Board.
`
`Mr. Sistos is counsel for Patent Owner Alacritech, Inc. (“Alacritech”), which
`
`is the plaintiff in related pending litigations in the United States District Court for
`
`the Eastern District of Texas (Alacritech v. Dell, No. 2:16-cv-00695, Alacritech v.
`
`Wistron et al., No. 2:16-cv-00692, and Alacritech v. CenturyLink et al., No. 2:16-
`
`cv-00693), in which the subject patent of this proceeding, U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,673,072, is asserted. Mr. Sistos is familiar with the subject matter at issue in this
`
`proceeding as a result of his representation of Alacritech in the related litigation,
`
`including the alleged prior art that Petitioner presents in this proceeding, as well as
`
`issues of claim construction.
`
`Even though Mr. Sistos has not been involved in other proceedings before
`
`the Board, he has fully familiarized himself with its established practices.
`
`Accordingly, he has established familiarity with the subject matter at issue in these
`
`proceedings and the conduct of these proceedings to date.
`
`Mr. Sistos has read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide and the Board’s Rules for Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of 37
`
`C.F.R., and he agrees to be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2017-01406
`U.S. Patent No. 7,673,072
`
`set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.01 et seq., and to disciplinary jurisdiction under 37
`
`C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`IV. ANALYSIS
`
`The facts contained in the Statement of Facts above, and contained in the
`
`Sistos Declaration, establish that there is good cause to admit Mr. Sistos pro hac
`
`vice in this proceeding under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c). Alacritech’s lead counsel is a
`
`registered practitioner, Mr. Sistos is an experienced litigating attorney, and Mr.
`
`Sistos has an established familiarity with the subject matter at issue in these
`
`proceedings.
`
`V. CONCLUSION
`
`
`
`Therefore, Alacritech respectfully submits that there is good cause for the
`
`Board to recognize Mr. Sistos as Pro Hac Vice for Alacritech during these
`
`proceedings. Alacritech’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission is accompanied by
`
`a Declaration of Mr. Sistos (Ex. 2700) as required by the Order.
`
`
`
`
`Date: September 5, 2018
`
` Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /s/ James M. Glass, Reg. No. 46,729
` James M. Glass (Reg. No. 46,729)
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN, LLP
`51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
`New York, NY 10010
`Tel: (212) 849-7000
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2017-01406
`U.S. Patent No. 7,673,072
`
`Fax: (212) 849-7100
`Email: jimglass@quinnemanuel.com
`
`Lead Attorney for Patent Owner –
`Alacritech, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2017-01406
`U.S. Patent No. 7,673,072
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), the undersigned hereby certify that
`
`UNOPPOSED PATENT OWNER ALACRITECH, INC.'S MOTION FOR
`
`ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE OF ANTONIO SISTOS was served on
`
`September 5, 2018 by filing it through the Patent Review Processing System, as
`
`
`
`well as by e-mailing copies to:
`
`Garland T. Stephens (Reg. No. 37,242)
`garland.stephens@weil.com
`intel.alacritech.ipr@weil.com
`WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
`700 LOUISIANA, SUITE 1700
`HOUSTON, TX 77002-2784
`
`Anne M. Cappella (Reg. No. 43,217)
`Adrian Percer (Reg. No. 46,986)
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`201 Redwood Shores Parkway
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`Tel: (650) 802-3141
`Fax: (650) 802-3100
`anne.cappella@weil.com
`adrian.percer@weil.com
`
`Patrick McPherson (Reg. No. 46,255)
`David T. Xue
`Karineh Khachatourian
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`PDMcPherson@duanemorris.com
`DTXue@duanemorris.com
`karinehk@duanemorris.com
`
`Christopher TL Douglas (Reg. No. 56,950)
`Kirk Bradley
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2017-01406
`U.S. Patent No. 7,673,072
`
`ALSTON & BIRD LLP
`101 South Tryon Street, Suite 4000
`Charlotte, North Carolina 28280
`christopher.douglas@alston.com
`kirk.bradley@alston.com
`
`Benjamin E. Weed
`Erik J. Halverson
`K&L GATES LLP
`benjamin.weed.ptab@klgates.com
`erik.halverson@klgates.com
`
`Date: September 5, 2018
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /s/ James M. Glass, Reg. No. 46,729
` James M. Glass (Reg. No. 46,729)
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN, LLP
`51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
`New York, NY 10010
`jimglass@quinnemanuel.com
`
`
`Lead Attorney for Patent Owner –
`Alacritech, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket