throbber

`
`GUIDELINES
`Florida State Courts System
`
`Provision of Real-Time Court Reporting Services
`for Attorneys with Disabilities
`
`
`Real-time court reporting services will be provided at court expense in
`county and circuit court criminal trials for attorneys who are deaf or
`hard of hearing. The provision of real-time court reporting services in
`other county and circuit court criminal proceedings in which the court
`is already providing court reporting services to comply with
`constitutional requirements will be considered on a case-by-case basis.
`These services will be provided in accordance with the Florida State
`Courts System’s “Policy on Court Real-Time Transcription Services for
`Persons Who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing” (attached). 1, 2
`Request Procedures:
`Attorneys should submit requests for real-time court reporting services
`as follows:
`
`
`1. Requests should be made as far in advance as possible, but
`preferably at least five working days before the date of the
`courtroom proceeding.
`2. Requests may be presented either orally or in written format. All
`
`1 Providing accommodations for attorneys with disabilities who appear in the
`courtroom as part of their employment duties or professional practice is a
`responsibility that appropriately may be shared by the attorney’s employer and the
`courts. Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requires employers of 15
`or more employees and Title II of the ADA requires all state and local government
`employers to provide reasonable accommodations to qualified employees with a
`disability. In addition, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,
`covers recipients of federal funding, and requires all covered organizations to provide
`accommodations for their employees. These responsibilities are concomitant with the
`courts’ responsibility under Title II of the ADA. It is to everyone’s benefit when
`employers and the court system work together to ensure that reasonable
`accommodations for attorneys with disabilities are provided in the most efficient and
`cost effective manner.
`
` 2
`
` In accordance with 28 C.F.R. ' 35.150, the provision of real-time transcription
`services or other appropriate auxiliary aids or services is limited to those that do not
`fundamentally alter the nature of the service, program, or activity, or result in undue
`financial or administrative burdens.
`
`
`Ultratec Exhibit 1010
`Ultratec v Sorenson IP Holdings Page 1 of 4
`
`

`

`requests will be reduced to writing by the ADA coordinator.
`Requests must include a description of the hearing disability that
`necessitates provision of real-time court reporting services.3
`3. Requests should be forwarded to the local court ADA coordinator
`(contact information for ADA coordinators is available on the
`Florida Courts website, www.flcourts.org). If the request is
`originally presented to a judge or judge’s office, the judge shall
`confer with the court ADA coordinator.
`4. The judge, court ADA coordinator, or other court representative,
`as appropriate to the circumstances, may engage in an
`interactive process with the attorney to discuss whether
`provision of real-time court reporting services is appropriate.
`5. After analysis, the judge, court ADA coordinator, or other court
`representative, as appropriate to the circumstances, will inform
`the attorney whether the request will be granted.
`6. Attorneys may utilize the court’s grievance procedure when
`requests for real-time court reporting services are denied.
`
`Prepared by the Office of the State Courts Administrator
`October 30, 2007
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3 In order to fully and fairly evaluate a request, it may be necessary for the court to
`require the attorney to provide documentation about his or her disability, including a
`statement from a qualified health care provider that identifies the attorney’s
`functional limitations and describes how the requested real-time court reporting
`services address those limitations.
`
`Ultratec Exhibit 1010
`Ultratec v Sorenson IP Holdings Page 2 of 4
`
`

`

`Florida State Courts System
`
`Policy on Court Real-Time Transcription Services
`for Persons Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing
`
`
`It is the policy of the Florida State Courts System that all judges and
`court staff will abide by the following guidelines in those court
`proceedings where real-time transcription services are utilized as a
`reasonable and necessary method of ensuring effective participation
`by a party, witness, attorney, judge, court employee, juror, or other
`participant who is deaf or hard of hearing and entitled to auxiliary aids
`or services pursuant to Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of
`1990:
`
`
`Real-time transcription services should be performed by a
`1.
`court reporter who is specially trained in this skill.
`
`The device selected should display text in a manner that
`2.
`accomplishes full access to the service and should be a non-glare,
`display-type computer monitor; a large-screen image from a data
`projection panel and overhead projector; or other device that ensures
`effective communication. It is recommended that the monitor be 15
`inches or larger. The size of the monitor should take into account the
`number of persons viewing it. The display of the text should be dark
`letters on a light background, double spaced, with mixed case as
`appropriate for the context of the proceedings. The display font or
`type size should be a minimum of 18 points. The real-time
`transcription service should display not less than four (4) and no more
`than 17 lines of text at any one time. The display view should be
`limited to text that relates to the real-time transcription service; no
`system information should be visible to the user.
`
`Text displayed on the monitor should appear within three
`3.
`(3) seconds from the time of steno-type input. This time frame
`requirement includes time for any and all related spell checks including
`phonetic translation for untranslates.
`
`At the commencement of the proceeding, the court should
`4.
`determine whether effective communication is occurring. The court
`should instruct the person receiving the service and other participants
`in the proceeding to alert the court should a translation or other
`problem occur that impedes the person receiving the service from
`effectively participating in that person's appropriate role in the
`proceeding. Furthermore, if the court reporter becomes aware that an
`
`Ultratec Exhibit 1010
`Ultratec v Sorenson IP Holdings Page 3 of 4
`
`

`

`unacceptable number of untranslates or other problem is occurring
`with the real-time transcription service, the court reporter should
`immediately alert the court. Should the real-time transcription service
`become ineffective, the court should determine the cause of the
`problem and implement any corrective action the court deems
`reasonable or necessary.
`
`The reporter, prior to the beginning of the proceeding,
`5.
`should review the case file and build a good client/job dictionary. This
`same job dictionary should be used at each subsequent proceeding in
`a particular case. The job dictionary should be updated during the
`course of the proceeding to include untranslates that may be corrected
`by any of the parties during the proceedings. Such updates should be
`operable throughout the remainder of the proceeding's real-time
`transcription service and carried over to any future proceedings.
`
`The real-time transcription service and corrections that
`6.
`were displayed on the screen or monitor during the proceeding must
`be preserved in a manner to reflect what was actually displayed. Any
`corrections that were not viewed but that later become a part of the
`official court record must be maintained separately from the record of
`displayed text. At the conclusion of any proceeding (other than juror
`deliberations) in which real-time transcription service has been
`provided to ensure effective communication for a person who is deaf
`or hard of hearing, the reporter shall preserve the record of the real-
`time transcription service in accordance with rule 2.075(e), Florida
`Rules of Judicial Administration, unless otherwise directed by the
`court.
`
`If real-time transcription services are required for a juror
`7.
`who is deaf or hard of hearing, a court reporter shall be present in the
`jury room during jury deliberations. The role of the reporter, when in
`the jury room, is not as a reporter of the official record; therefore the
`real-time transcription service of jury deliberations must be deleted
`immediately upon the conclusion of jury deliberation. The reporter
`shall not counsel, advise, attempt to explain terms, or interject
`personal opinion. Furthermore, the reporter shall not read back the
`real-time transcription service from the proceeding or jury
`deliberations without express judicial approval or authorization.
`
`Ultratec Exhibit 1010
`Ultratec v Sorenson IP Holdings Page 4 of 4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket