throbber
VoiP
`
`rest moves among the U.S., Asia Pacific, and Western European regions. It is
`important to closely examine who wi.ll be using this and what carriers or operators
`will be deploying these technologies. Probe Research (www.proberesearch.com)
`believes that by 2002, 6% of all voice lines will be VoiP This is still rather minor,
`given the fact that some have been saying that VoiP would have replaced circuit(cid:173)
`switched calling by now. Piper ]affray (www.piperjaffray.com) reports that minutes
`of communication services traveling over lP telephony networks will grow from an
`anticipated 70 billion minutes and 6% of all the PSTN traffic in the year 2003 to
`over a trillion minutes by the year 2006. In the United States alone, the PSTN is
`handling some 3.6 trillion minutes of traffic monthly.
`Although VolP has a very important place in telecommunications, it's impor(cid:173)
`tant to realize that it is not yet taking over the traditional circuit-switched approach
`to accommodating voice teleph9ny. The exciting future of VolP lies in advanced
`and interesting new applications, an environment where voice is but one of the
`information streams comprising a rich media application. Many expect that sales of
`VoiP equipment will grow rapidly in the coming months and years. Part of the rea(cid:173)
`son for this growth is that the network-specific cost for VolP on dedicated net(cid:173)
`works is quite a bit lower than the cost of calls on circuit-switched networks(cid:173)
`about US l.l cents per minute as compared with US 1.7 cents per minute. Using
`VolP to carry telephony traffic greatly reduces the cost of the infrastructure for the
`provider, but at the expense of possibly not being able to maintain QoS. Potential
`savings are even greater if VolP is implemented as an adjunct to data network
`Another factor encouraging customers to examine VoiP is the use of shared net(cid:173)
`works. Because IP emphasizes logical rather than physical connections, it's easier for
`multiple carriers to coexist on a single network. This encourages cooperative shar(cid:173)
`ing of interconnected networks, structured as anything from sale of wholesale cir(cid:173)
`cuits to real-time capacity exchanges. Also , VoiP can reduce the barriers to entry in
`this competitive data communications world. New companies can enter the market
`\vithout the huge fixed costs that are nom1ally associated with the traditional cir(cid:173)
`cuit-switched network models. Furthermore, because IP telephony will enable new
`forms of competition, there will be pressure to better align government-controlled
`prices with underlying service costs. International VoiP services are already priced
`well below the official rates and some of VoiP's appeal is that it eliminates the
`access charges interexchange carriers normally have to pay to interconnect to the
`local exchange carrier. ln the United States, these charges range from US 2 cents to
`US 5 cents per minute.
`
`Advantages of VoiP
`The key benefits of VoiP are cost savings associated with toll calls, enhanced voice
`services, and creative and innovative new applications. The key concerns related to
`
`APPENDIX C
`
`AT&T, Exh. 1003, p. 311
`
`

`

`350
`
`Chapter 11
`
`• Next-Generation Network Services
`
`Regulations Related to VoiP
`It's one thing to approach telephony on the Internet such that the incumbent is pro(cid:173)
`tected from competition with other voice telephony services on the Internet. But stat(cid:173)
`ing that voice on the Internet should not be allowed would be to cut your own throat.
`All the exciting new applications on the Internet do involve the use of multimedia
`applications, and voice is part of that overall stream. So, we have to be very careful
`about what we're regulating-whether it's voice, which is increasingly part of a larger
`application set, or whether it's traditional voice telephony.
`
`VoiP are voice quality compared to that in today's PSTN; the cost of QoS to ensure
`the same quality as in the PSTN; security; the current lack of compelling applica(cid:173)
`tions; and regulatory issues, such as whether voice wi.ll be allowed on the Internet
`and whether voice will be treated as an altogether different environment- as a con(cid:173)
`verged, integrated application.
`
`VoiP Applications
`VolP includes any set of enabling technologies and infrastructures that digitize
`voice signals and transmit them in packetized format. Three major network archi(cid:173)
`tectures can be used in support of VolP applications:
`
`Voice-over intranets, which could be based on leased lines, Frame Relay,
`ATM, or VPNs
`• Voice-over extranets, which could also be based on leased lines, Frame
`Relay, ATM, or VPNs
`• Voice over the public Internet
`
`The following sections discuss some of the key issues related to VolP applications.
`
`IP Long-Distance Wholesale
`So far, the most compelling business case for VolP has been in IP long-distance
`wholesale, where there are clear financial benefits and low barriers to entry. Early
`pioneers in this area include iBasis, ITXC, and Level 3, which predominantly offer
`lP services to domestic and international carriers, but also offer services to corpo(cid:173)
`rations and other service providers. What the customers gain by doing business in
`this fashion is a reduction in cost associated with carrying their traffic over expen(cid:173)
`sive toll or international transit links.
`ln IP long-distance wholesale, the voice service levels must match those of the
`PSTN. End customers of the international carriers expect to perceive the same voice
`
`APPENDIX C
`
`AT&T, Exh. 1003, p. 312
`
`

`

`VoiP
`
`351
`
`D 5oftswitch
`
`'
`
`'
`
`/
`
`557
`Network
`
`P5TN
`
`Broadband
`Packet Network
`
`P5TN
`
`VOIP{Trunking
`Gateway
`
`VOIP/Trunking
`Gateway
`
`VOIP{Trunking
`Gateway
`
`P5TN
`
`---- i
`
`L
`
`Figure 11.11 A converged long-distance network
`
`quality throughout. How can providers guarantee that when it's almost impossible to
`control QoS over the public Internet? Even in the case of IP backbones, QoS depends
`on the underlying architecture used. The solution lies in smart management of
`packet latency, to ensure circuit-like behavior inside the IP network. For example,
`iBasis developed a proprietary routing algorithm that monitors performance on the
`Internet; when it detects that congestion levels may affect the quality of the voice, it
`swi.tches the calls over to the circuit-switched network, thereby ensming that cus(cid:173)
`tomers experience the high quality that they expect end-to-end.
`The lP long-distance wholesale environment takes advantage of a converged
`voice/data backbone by using trunking gateways to leverage the PSTN (see Figure
`11.11). This allows support and processing of voice calls. The trunking gateways
`enable connection of the data network to the PSTN, to support long-haul carrying of
`the switched calls. In addition, svvitching services can be added to the data networks
`through the use of softswitches. (The functions and types of softswitches and gate(cid:173)
`ways that make up the new public network are discussed later in this chapter.)
`These are main issues in selecting providers of IP long-distance wholesale:
`
`Voice quality versus bandwidth- How much bandwidth do you use to
`ensure the best quality?
`Connecting to the customer-How many services need to be supported
`(voice, data, dialup modem, fax, ISDN, xDSL, cable modem)?
`Maintaining voice quality- As bandwidth becomes constrained, how do
`you maintain the voice quality?
`
`APPENDIX C
`
`AT&T, Exh. 1003, p. 313
`
`

`

`352
`
`Chapter 1 1
`
`• Next-Generation Network Services
`
`IP Telephony
`There are two main approach es to IP telephony. First, there's IP telephony over the
`Internet. Calls made over the public Internet using IP telephony products provide
`great cost-efficiencies. But the Internet is a large, unmanaged public network, with
`no reliable service guarantee, so the low costs come at a trade-off. International
`long-distance consumer calls are the major application of IP telephony over the
`Internet. Second, the use of private IP telephony networks is rapidly emerging. In
`this approach, calls are made over private WANs, using IP telephony protocols.
`The network owner can control how resources are allocated, thereby providing
`QoS and a managed network. Many private IP telephony networks are being built.
`They enable an enterprise to take advantage of its investments in the IP infrastruc(cid:173)
`ture. Again, because this is a single-owner network, th e QoS issues are much easier
`to contend with; in fact, a single-owner network makes it possible to contend with
`QoS issues!
`Multinational enterprises spend billions of dollars on international voice ser(cid:173)
`vices each year, so the savings that lP telephony offers is compelling. The cost ben(cid:173)
`efit of nmning voice services over a private IP network is on th e order of 20% or
`more savings on international long distance, as compared to using traditional voice
`services. Private IP transport platforms will be increasingly deployed, therefore, as
`an enterprisewide telephony option.
`Recent deployment of IP local exchange products, coupled with low-band(cid:173)
`width, high-quality voice compression , creates a solid foundation for extending
`business telephone service to telecommuters at home or on the road. Th e efficien(cid:173)
`cies of IP packet technology, coupled with the ITU G.723. l voice compression
`standards at 6.4Kbps, enable road warriors and small office/home office workers to
`have a complete virtual office over a standard 56Kbps Internet modem connection
`to the office. The really great feature of this environment is that your current loca(cid:173)
`tion is your office and your IP phone rings wherever you are. However, this
`requires an lP local exchange- a carrier-class product that resides in the service
`provider network and provides PBX-like telephony service to multiple business
`and telecommuter customers. It also requires a softswitch (that is, call-agent soft(cid:173)
`ware) that's used for purposes of managing call processing functions and adminis(cid:173)
`tration. Also, end-user services are delivered via IP Ethernet phones or analog
`telephones that use Ethernet-to-analog adapters.
`There are three major categories of IP phones:
`
`• POTS phone-The advantage of the POTS phone is high availability and
`low price. The disadvantage is that it has no feature buttons and the
`required Ethernet-to-analog adapter is quite costly.
`• Soft phone-A soft phone is software that runs on the user's PC and graphi(cid:173)
`cally resembles a telephone. Its advantage is low price. Its disadvantage is that
`
`APPENDIX C
`
`AT&T, Exh. 1003, p. 314
`
`

`

`VoiP
`
`353
`
`•
`
`it relies on the PC sound card, and it can create volume level problems when
`you switch between it and other applications that use the PC sound card.
`IP Ethernet phone-This device looks and works just like a traditional
`multiline business display phone, and it plugs into an Ethernet Rj-45 jack.
`It's priced similarly to PBX phones, at US$300 and up . Emerging "IP phone
`on a chip" technologies promise dramatically lower prices in the near
`future.
`
`The evolution of IP telephony will involve many different types of applica(cid:173)
`tions, including long-distance wholesale voice services; the support of voice appli(cid:173)
`cations for campus or enterprise networks in bringing VolP to the desktop in the
`form of new advanced applications that involve converged streams (such as video
`conferencing or multimedia in the establishment of remote virtual offices); Inter(cid:173)
`net smart phones; IP PBXs; IP centrex service; unified messaging; Internet call
`waiting; and virtual second-line applications.
`
`Vo/P Enhanced Services
`Another approach to supporting voice services is to look toward enhanced ser(cid:173)
`vices. There are two categories of enhanced services:
`
`• Transaction-oriented services-These services include Click-N-Call appli(cid:173)
`cations, interactive chat, Surf-With-Me, videoconferencing, and varieties of
`financial transactions.
`• Productivity-enhancing services-These services include worldwide for(cid:173)
`warding, multiparty calling, a visual second line, unified messaging, collab(cid:173)
`oration, access to online directories, visual assistance, CD-quality sound,
`personal voice response, and video answering machines.
`
`The key to enhanced services is not cost savings, but cost savings are realized
`through toll bypass, QoS differentiation, the capability to support remote access,
`an d the capability to create new forms of messaging. Because of the cost savings
`and features available, the use of enhanced services will grow by leaps and bounds
`over the next several years.
`VolP is part of a larger trend toward innovative voice-enabled Internet applica(cid:173)
`tions and network interactive multimedia. This trend includes various facilities to
`enhance e-commerce, customer service, converged voice and visual applications,
`new intelligent agents and variou s forms of bots, and e-calling campaigns. These
`sorts of advanced services make it possible to gain greater value from the IP invest(cid:173)
`ments that have been made, and at the same time, they create interesting n ew reve(cid:173)
`nue streams with altogether n ew businesses.
`
`APPENDIX C
`
`AT&T, Exh. 1003, p. 315
`
`

`

`354
`
`Chapter 11
`
`• Next-Generation Network Services
`
`We'll see VolP applications increasingly used in a number of ways. VolP appli(cid:173)
`cations will be included on Web-based call centers as automatic call-backs from
`customer service-based phone numbers entered into a Web page; as multiparty
`conference calls, with voice links and data sharing, initiated also from a Web page;
`and in the process of reviewing and paying bills. The key is to blend rich, Internet(cid:173)
`based content with a voice service. An example of an emerging application that
`illustrates such innovation is online gaming. lnnoMedia and Sega Enterprises are
`integrating lnnoMedia Internet telephony into Sega Dreamcast game consoles to
`allow game players worldwide to voice chat with each other while playing games.
`This device can also be used to cost-effectively place calls in more than 200 coun(cid:173)
`tries through InnoSphere, InnoMedia's global network. For example, the rate from
`the United States to Hong Kong will be US2 cents per minute, from the United
`States to the United Kingdom it will be USS cents, and from the United States to
`j apan, Australia, and most of Europe, it will be US9 cents.
`Another example of an interesting new VolP application is Phonecast, a media
`network of Internet-sourced audio channels for news, entertainment, and shop(cid:173)
`ping, available to telephones. Created by PhoneRun and WorldCom, Phonecast is
`modeled after television and radio broadcasting, and it allows callers to create a
`personal radio station and direct it by using simple voice commands. This is the
`first of a series of innovative content and service partnerships, assembled to form a
`comprehensive voice-portal product line.
`
`VoiP Service Categories
`There are several main VolP service categories:
`
`•
`
`• Enterprise-based VoiP-ln enterprise-based VolP, whether for the LAN or
`WAN, specialized equipment is required at the customer site.
`IP telephony service providers-These providers are generally involved in
`toll-bypass operations. They do not require specialized equipment at the
`customer site, but they may require additional dialing procedures to gain
`access to the network. Currently, multistage dialing is one of the problems
`we still face: You have to dial a seven- or eight-digit number to gain access
`to your ISP, and then you have to dial a string of digits for the auth entica(cid:173)
`tion code, and then you have to dial the string of digits corresponding to
`the number you want to reach. Single-stage dialing will remedy this situa(cid:173)
`tion in the very n ear future.
`• Converged service providers- These companies will bundle together
`voice, data, and video services.
`• Consumer VoiP-Consumer VolP is generally geared toward consumer
`connections over the public Internet.
`
`APPENDIX C
`
`AT&T, Exh. 1003, p. 316
`
`

`

`VoiP
`
`355
`
`VoiP Network Elements
`VoiP may seem like rocket science compared to conversations, but the concept is
`really quite simple: Convert voice into packets for transmission over a company's
`TCPIIP network. Two characteristics determine the quality of the VolP transmis(cid:173)
`sion: latency and packet loss. Latency is the time it takes to travel from Point A to
`Point B. The maximum toleran ce for voice latency is about 250 milliseconds, and
`it's recommended that the delay be less than 150 milliseconds. Small amounts of
`packet loss introduce pops and clicks that you can work around, but large amounts
`of packet loss render a conversation unintelligible. With too much packet loss, you
`would sound like you were saying "Da dop yobla bleep op bop," because little
`packets with much of your conversation would have been lost in congestion and
`could not be retransmitted while working within the delay requirements of voice.
`Hence, packet loss with VoiP can cause big chunks of a conversation to be lost.
`(We will talk about ways to resolve that a little later in this chapter.)
`VoiP gateways have allowed IP telephony applications and new, innovative
`VolP applications to move into the mainstream. Other features that have helped
`the development of VoiP are Internet telephony directory, media gateways, and
`softswitches, as well as telephony signaling protocols.
`
`Vo/P Gateways
`VoiP gateways bridge the traditional circuit-switched PSTN and the packet(cid:173)
`switched Internet. Gateways overcome the addressing problem. A couple years ago,
`for two VoiP users to communicate, they had to be using the same software, they
`had to have sound cards and microphones attached to their PCs , and they had to
`coordinate a common time during which both would be online in order to engage
`in a VoiP session. Gateways have made all that unnecessary, and now the only
`requirement is that you know the user's phone number. Phone-to-PC or PC-to(cid:173)
`phone operation requires the use of only one gateway. Phone-to-phone operation
`requires two gateways, one at each end.
`VolP gateway functionality includes packetizing and compressing voice;
`enhancing voice quality by applying echo cancellation and silence suppression;
`dual-tone multifrequency (DTMF) signaling support (that is, touch-tone dialing);
`routing of voice packets; authentication of users; address management; administra(cid:173)
`tion of a network of gateways; and the generation of call detail records that are
`used to create bills and invoices.
`To place a call over a VolP network, the customer dials the number the same
`way as on a traditional phone. The edge device, the VoiP gateway, communicates
`the dialed number to the server, where call-agent software-
`that is, a softswitch(cid:173)
`determines what is the appropriate IP address for that destination call number and
`returns that IP address to the edge device. The edge device then converts the voice
`signal to IP format, adds the given address of the destination node, and sends the
`
`APPENDIX C
`
`AT&T, Exh. 1003, p. 317
`
`

`

`356
`
`Chapter 11
`
`• Next-Generation Network Services
`
`signal on its way. If enhanced services are required, th e softswitch is called back
`into action to perform the additional functions . (The softswitch is also referred to
`as a Class 5 agent because it behaves like a local exchange or a Class 5 office.)
`There are two primary categories of VolP gateways:
`
`• Gateways based on existing router or remote access concentrator (RAC)
`platforms- The key providers here include the traditional data networking
`vendors, such as 3Com , Cisco, Lucent, and Motorola. As incumben t equip(cid:173)
`ment suppliers to ISPs, the data networking vendors are capturing the larg(cid:173)
`est percentage of these sales. They represented the majority of VolP gateway
`sales through 2000 because ISPs were buying gateways at a fast rate based
`on the significant wholesale opportunity available to larger carriers.
`• Server-based gateways- These are designed from the ground up to support
`VolP Key providers of server-based gateways include telecommunications
`vendors, as well as companies specifically designed for this business; Clar(cid:173)
`ent, Ericsson , Lucent, NetSpeak, Nortel, Nuera, and VocalTec are among
`the vendors involved. These gateways will overtake router and RAC solu(cid:173)
`tions as incumbent carriers deploy more server-based gateways with exten(cid:173)
`sive call server and signaling capabilities.
`
`More and more merger and acquisition activities will lead to blended solutions,
`causing the distinction between the different types of gateways to blur. RAC- and
`router-based gateways will take on more enhanced call-server characteristics as a result.
`The market segments for the two categories, then, are composed of the following:
`
`•
`
`• Enterprise VolP gateways- These gateways are customer premise equipment
`deployed between a PBX and a WAN device, typically a router, to provide call
`setup, call routing, and conversion of voice into IP packets and vice versa.
`• VoiP routers-Voice cards perform packetization and compression func(cid:173)
`tions and are inserted into a router chassis. The router then directs the
`packets to their ultimate destination.
`IP PBXs-An IP PBX is an infrastructure of distributed telephony servers that
`operates in packet-switched mode and offers the benefits of statistical multi(cid:173)
`plexing and IP routing. We are still in the early days for IP PBXs, although
`they are beginning to emerge as a viable alternative. A key concern is reliabil(cid:173)
`ity. (IP PBXs are discussed in more detail later in this chapter.)
`• Service-provider VolP gateways- These are used to aggregate incoming
`VolP traffic and route the traffic accordingly. The role is analogous to that of
`the local exchange. Challenges include the local loop competition among the
`incumbent carriers, quality concerns, shortage of product, interoperability
`
`APPENDIX C
`
`AT&T, Exh. 1003, p. 318
`
`

`

`VoiP
`
`357
`
`issues, the lack of hot-swappable and redundant support, and the lack of Net(cid:173)
`work Equipment Building Systems (NEBS) compliance.
`• VolP access concentrators- VoiP cards fit into an existing dial access
`concentrator.
`• SS7 gateways- SS7 gateways are critical to enabling us to tap into the intelli(cid:173)
`gence services that enhance so much of the telephony activity on the PSTN.
`
`Th ere are many gateway vendors. All gateway vendors share the need for digi(cid:173)
`tal signal processors and embedded software solutions that provide for silen t sup(cid:173)
`pression, echo cancellation, compression and decompression, DTMF signaling,
`and packet management. Th erefore, another very important part of this equation is
`the component vendors. Manufacturers of VoiP equipment need to con tinue to
`make quality improvements in the underlying technology. This includes address(cid:173)
`ing interoperability between different gateway vendors' equipment; improving the
`tradeoffs between cost, function, and quality; and introducing single-stage dialing
`and the ability to dial from any telephone.
`
`Internet Telephony Directory
`An Internet telephony directory is a vital piece of the VolP puzzle, so this section
`talks a little bit about the IETF Request for Comment 2916, also known as ENUM
`services. ENUM services convert telephone numbers into the Internet address
`information required to support all forms of IP-enabled communication services,
`including real-time voice, voicemail, fax, remote printing, and unified messaging.
`In other words, ENUM is a standard for mapping telephone numbers to IP
`addresses. DNS translates URLs to IP addresses, and EMUM uses the DNS to map a
`PSTN phone number (based on th e E.l64 standard) to the appropriate URLs.
`ICANN is considering three proposals for the . tel domain. The applicants are
`NetNumber, which currently runs the Global Internet Telephony Directory (an
`implementation of ENUM that is used by IP-enabled platforms to convert standard
`telephone numbers in to Internet address information) , Number. tel, and Telnic
`based in the United Kingdom. The ITU is trying to advance an implementation of
`the IETF ENUM standard under the domain el64.arpa. In this implementation,
`control of telephone number addressing on the Internet would be distributed to
`the more than 240 national public network regulatory bodies that administer tele(cid:173)
`phone numbers for the PSTN.
`
`Media Gateways
`Media gateways provide seamless interoperability between circuit-switched, or
`PSTN, networking domains and those of the packet-switched realm (that is, IP, AIM,
`and Frame Relay networks). They interconnect with the SS7 network and enable the
`
`APPENDIX C
`
`AT&T, Exh. 1003, p. 319
`
`

`

`358
`
`Chapter 11
`
`Next-Generation Network Services
`
`handling of IP services. They're designed to support a variety of telephony signaling
`protocols. Media gateways are designed to support Class 4, or toll-switch, functions,
`as well as Class 5, or local exchange, services. They operate in the classic public net(cid:173)
`work environment, where call con trol is separate from media flow. They support a
`variety of traffic-
`including data, voice, fax , and multimedia-over a data backbone.
`Enhanced applications of media gateways include network conferencing, network(cid:173)
`integrated voice response, fax serving, network, and directory services.
`As shown in Figure 11.12, media gateways fit between the access and core lay(cid:173)
`ers of the network, and they include several categories: VoiP trunking gateways,
`VoiP access gateways, and network access service devices. They provide service
`interconnection or intercarrier call handling. The trunking gateways interface
`between the PSTN and VoiP networks, terminating trunks associated with SS7 con(cid:173)
`trol links. These Time Division Multiplexed trunks carry media from an adjacent
`switch in the traditional circuit-switched network, and the adjacent switch gener(cid:173)
`ally belongs to another service provider. (Depending on the agreements between
`service providers, these are also referred to as cocarrier trunks or feature group D
`trunks.) The trunking gateways manage a large number of digital virtual circuits.
`The access gateways provide traditional analog or ISDN interfaces to the VoiP net(cid:173)
`works; they are devices that terminate PSTN signaling and media, and they connect
`to PBXs, as well as to traditional circuit switches, such as the Class 5 and Class 4
`offices. With network access servers, you can attach a modem to a telephon e circuit
`
`Softswitch
`
`IP
`phone
`
`POTS
`phone
`
`ISDN PRI or T-1
`trunk TOM G.711
`
`Figure 11.12 VoiP network architecture
`
`POTS
`phone
`
`POTS
`phone
`
`APPENDIX C
`
`AT&T, Exh. 1003, p. 320
`
`

`

`VoiP
`
`and p rovide data access to the Internet, so that you can attain managed modem ser(cid:173)
`vice by using cocarrier trunks.
`
`Vo!P Softswitches
`Call-control intelligence is outside the media gateways and VolP gateways; it is,
`instead, handled by a softswitch, also referred to as a media gateway controller or call
`agent. The softswitch implements the service logic. Tt controls external trunking
`gateways, access gateways, and remote access servers. Softswitches run on com(cid:173)
`mercial computers and operating systems, and they provide open application pro(cid:173)
`gramming interfaces.
`A softswitch is a software-based, distributed switching and control platform, and
`it controls the switching and routing of media packets between media gateways,
`across the packet backbone. Softswitches provide new tools and technologies to build
`services in a more productive Internet-based service creation environment. Operators
`are advised to adopt a "service separation" strategy and to distribute applications
`throughout the network, avoiding the monolithic closed system that is similar to the
`circuit-switched environment. We can use application servers to partition enhanced
`telecommunications services and to determine what interface protocol to select for
`facilitating interoperability between the softswitches and the applications servers.
`The softswitch functionally controls the voice or data traffic path by signaling
`between media gateways that actually transport the traffic (see Chapter 10). The
`gateway provides the connection between an IP or ATM network and the traditional
`circuit-switched network, acting a lot like a multiprotocol cross-connect. The soft(cid:173)
`switch ensures that a call's or a connection's underlying signaling information-auto(cid:173)
`matic number identifiers, billing data, and call triggers- are communicated between
`the gateways. Softswitches must reuse intelligent network services through an open
`and flexible directory interface, so they provide a directory-enabled architecture with
`access to relational database managemen t systems, and to Lightweight Directory
`Access Protocol (LDAP) and Transaction Capabilities Applications Part (TCAP)
`directories. Softswitches also offer programmable back-office features , along with
`advanced policy-based management of all software components.
`The softswitch is a very important element in the new public network. lt is
`what enables the media and trunking gateways to communicate with the underly(cid:173)
`ing infrastructure of the PSTN and thereby to draw on the service logic needed to
`support telephony activities. In addition, softswitches will be able to reach to new
`application servers on which new generations of applications have been designed
`for new versions of enhanced services.
`
`Telephony Signaling Protocols
`New generations of signaling and IP telephony control protocols are emerging,
`and their purpose is to con trol the communication between the signaling gateway
`
`APPENDIX C
`
`AT&T, Exh. 1003, p. 321
`
`

`

`360
`
`Chapter 11
`
`Next-Generation Network Services
`
`and lP elements. Since the early days of exploring the nature of VolP and creat(cid:173)
`ing devices to enable it, a number of telephony signaling pro tocols have been
`considered. Some of the contenders h ave been H.323, Internet Protocol Device
`Control (IPDC) , Signal Gateway Control Protocol (SGCP), Multimedia Gateway
`Control Protocol (MGCP), Multimedia Ga teway Control (MEGACO), Session
`Initiation Protocol (SIP), and IP Signaling System 7 (lPS7). Many of those con(cid:173)
`tenders have combined, so this section focuses on the ones that have the s tron(cid:173)
`gest presence and potential today.
`
`H.323 The lTU H.323 version 2 specification is based on ISDN standards and
`limited to point-to-point applications. Version 2 requires multipoint control units
`(MCUs) to manage multiple sessions. H.323 version 2 provides much of the foun(cid:173)
`dation for exchange of voice and fax messages. The advantage of H.323 is that it is
`the most mature of the telephony signaling protocols, so many vendors offer it and
`vendor interoperability is good. On the other hand, H.323 is not as robust as some
`of the newer entrants, so other protocols on the horizon might eclipse H.323
`before too long.
`
`MCGP Bellcore and Level 3 merged their respective SGCP and IPDC specifica(cid:173)
`tions into MCGP In MCGP, softswitches provide the external control and manage(cid:173)
`ment, so MCGP is becoming a good way to connect an lAD to a gateway.
`
`MEGACO MEGACO is also called H.248 and it is anoth er emerging ITU stan(cid:173)
`dard. MEGACO describes how th e media gateway should behave and function.
`
`SIP SIP (IETF Request for Con~ment 2543) is an application-layer control, or sig(cid:173)
`naling protocol, for creating, modifying, and terminating sessions with one or more
`participants. SIP is used to set up a temporary session, or call, to the server so that
`the server can execute the necessary enhanced service logic. These sessions may
`include Internet multimedia conferences, Internet telephony, or multimedia distri(cid:173)
`bution. Linking caller ID to Web page content can link the status of a mobile phone
`with instant messaging. Members in a session can communicate via multicast or via
`a mesh of unicast relations, or by a combination of these. This is increasingly popu(cid:173)
`lar as the protocol between softswitches and application servers.
`
`LDAP LDAP is the standard directory server technology for the Internet. LDAP
`enables retrieval of information from multivendor directories. In fact, LDAP 3.0
`provides client systems, hubs, switches, routers, and a standard interface to r

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket