`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Celltrion, Inc.
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`Genentech, Inc.
`Patent Owner
`
`Patent No. 6,407,213
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review No. IPR2017-01374
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER CELLTRION’S MOTION TO SEAL
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.14 and 42.54, Petitioner Celltrion, Inc.
`
`respectfully requests that the Board seal portions of Petitioner Celltrion’s Motion
`
`to Exclude Evidence, filed herewith. The portions of Petitioner Celltrion’s Motion
`
`to Exclude Evidence that Petitioner seeks to seal reflect information that Patent
`
`Owner has marked Confidential pursuant to the Modified Default Standing
`
`Protective Order.
`
`I.
`
` Good Cause Exists for Sealing the Documents
`Although “the default rule is that all papers filed in an inter partes review
`
`are open and available for access by the public,” a party may file a motion to seal
`
`confidential information that is protected from disclosure. Garmin v. Cuozzo,
`
`IPR2012-00001, Paper No. 34 (PTAB March 14, 2013). “The standard for
`
`granting a motion to seal is ‘for good cause.’” Id. (quoting 37 C.F.R § 42.54).
`
`The Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756, 48760 (Aug. 14,
`
`2012), states that the “rules identify confidential information in a manner
`
`consistent with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”) 26(c)(1)(G), which
`
`provides for protective orders for trade secret or other confidential research,
`
`development, or commercial information.”
`
`Petitioner is filing portions of Petitioner Celltrion’s Motion to Exclude
`
`Evidence under seal, as it specifically relies on and describes Exhibits that Patent
`
`Owner has designated as “PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL” pursuant to the
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`Modified Default Standing Protective Order entered by the Board (Paper 14 at 3;
`
`Ex. 2030). A redacted version of Petitioner Celltrion’s Motion to Exclude
`
`Evidence has been publicly filed. Based on Patent Owner’s designations, there is
`
`good cause to seal the designated information.
`
`II. Certification of Conference with Opposing Party Pursuant to 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.54
`
`The parties have conferred, and Patent Owner does not oppose this motion.
`
`THEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests that the Board grant this
`
`Motion to Seal.
`
`Dated: June 22, 2018
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Cynthia Lambert Hardman/
`Cynthia Lambert Hardman (Reg. No. 53,179)
`Elizabeth J. Holland (Reg. No. 47,657)
`Robert V. Cerwinski (admitted pro hac vice)
`Linnea P. Cipriano (Reg. No. 67,729)
`GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
`The New York Times Building
`620 Eighth Avenue
`New York, NY 10018
`(212) 813-8800 (telephone)
`(212) 355-3333 (facsimile)
`
`Sarah J. Fischer (Reg. No. 74,104)
`GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
`100 Northern Avenue
`Boston, MA, 02210
`(617) 570-3908 (telephone)
`(617) 801-8991 (facsimile)
`
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), I certify that on this 22th day of June, 2018, I
`
`caused a copy of this PETITIONER CELLTRION’S MOTION TO SEAL by email
`
`on the lead and back up counsel for Patent Owners at:
`
`David Cavanaugh (David.Cavanaugh@wilmerhale.com)
`
`Lauren V. Blakely (lauren.blakely@wilmerhale.com)
`
`Robert Gunther (Robert.Gunther@wilmerhale.com)
`
`Adam Brausa (abrausa@durietangri.com)
`
`Daralyn Durie (ddurie@durietangri.com)
`
`Andrew Danford (Andrew.Danford@wilmerhale.com)
`
`Lisa Pirozzolo (Lisa.Pirozzolo@wilmerhale.com)
`
`Kevin Prussia (Kevin.Prussia@wilmerhale.com)
`
`By: /Cynthia Lambert Hardman/
`Cynthia Lambert Hardman (Reg. No. 53,179)
`GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
`The New York Times Building
`620 Eighth Avenue
`New York, NY 10018
`(212) 813-8800 (telephone)
`(212) 355-3333 (facsimile)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`