throbber
160
`
`lm111111wlogy Toda.Y. uo/. J, No. 6, /fJ,~2
`
`The three-dimensional structure of antibodies
`
`Markus Marquart and Johann Deisenhof er
`Max-Planck l n sritul fi.ir Biochemie, Abtc ilung S tr ukru rforschung IL D-8033 Marrinsried, f.R.G.
`
`Antibody molecules are glycoproteins which occur in
`vertebrate species. T hey recognize and bind an enor(cid:173)
`mous variety of foreign substances (antigens) a nd sub(cid:173)
`sequently trigger further defense mechanisms at the
`molecular or cellular
`level. Specific
`recognition
`requires surface structures complementa ry
`to the
`antigen and hence a h uge v;:iriety of antibody
`molecules. In contrast the effector functions need
`identica l interaction sites in all antibody molecules.
`The determination of the primary structure of
`imrnunoglobulins 1-3 and the X-ray crystallographic
`studies of several antibody molecu les and frag(cid:173)
`ments•.s.7.rn.iz-rs led to an advanced understanding of
`the way in which ant ibodies meet these opposing
`requirements.
`
`I is a schematic drawing of a n anLibody
`Fig.
`molecu le of class IgG I. IL is composed of two identical
`heavy chains and two identical light cha ins with rnol.
`wts of 50,000 and 25,000, respectively. Both types of
`polypeptide chain are folded into domains: the four
`domains of the heavy chain are VH, C H I, CH2, and
`C H 3; the light cha in consists of the two domains VL
`and C~. All doma ins except CH2 are arranged in
`pairs which a rc held together· by non-cova lent forces.
`Inter-chain disulfide bridges provide further stabil ity.
`Among antibody molecules of a given class and
`species, the V-domains differ considerably in amino
`acid sequence, whereas the C-domains have identical
`sequences. The V-domains are composed of about 110
`amino acid residues at. the N-tcr minal end of heavy
`a n<l light chains. The VH-VL pair together forms the
`antigen b inding site; differem a nt ibody specificities
`are the result of different amino acid sequences of the
`V-domains. T he sequence variability in V-domains is
`most pronounced in a few hypervariablc regions. On
`t he other ha nd the framework resid ues are well con(cid:173)
`served . The constant domains C I 12 and Cl-13 a re
`involved in effector fu nctions such as compl.ement
`activation and b inding to receptors on certain cell
`types. There is significant homology between the
`amino acid sequences of all C-domains, and of 1hc
`framework residues of V -domains.
`Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge reg ion yields stable
`a nd functional fragments: t he antigen-bi nding rrag(cid:173)
`rnent P'ab, and the Fe fragment (Fe was the first anti(cid:173)
`body fragment obtained in crystalline form)6 •
`
`A
`
`B
`
`F
`
`E
`
`IGG
`
`Fig. I Schematic represcnlalion of an IgG l immunuglobu lio
`molecul e.
`The a rms ol' the Y-s haped molecule arc limned by 1he Fab pans,
`the s1em is made up by the Fe pan. The ligh1 c hains are linked to
`1he heavy c hains by a disulphide bridge close to the C-tcrmi nus.
`The two heavy chains arc connected via two disu lphide linkages i11
`the hinge regio n.
`
`• £1$evl.;f' KM>m('"(l1nil P11'» 1\1~2
`OJC.7-4Q J<J/82/ 0QOo..oo(l0/$2 l!J
`
`H
`
`G
`
`c
`
`D
`
`x
`
`ARltANGEMENT OF snt.ANDS I N BWHKlGLOSUU H DOMA I NS
`X N-lfRMJ NUS UP. • C-HRMI NUS IJP
`
`Fig. 2 Schc rna1ic drawing of the strand topology in a V(cid:173)
`domain viewed parallel to the strands.
`(x ) and (• ) indi«<lle N- and C-terminal e nd s of the slrnnd~ poin1-
`ing LOw<!rdS I he Observer.
`
`1 of 7
`
`Celltrion, Inc., Exhibit 1082
`
`

`

`!111mu11olugy Today, wl. 3, Nu. Ii, 1982
`
`161
`
`Besides IgC I, several other classes (IgM, l g!\, lgD,
`IgE) and subclasses of immunoglobulins have been
`identified; the differences between these are located in
`the constant region of the heavy chain. The two types
`of light chain (kappa, lambda) can combine with
`heavy chains of any class.
`
`Domain folding
`The general folding pattern in a ll immunoglobulin
`domains is very similar. It is shown schematically in
`Fig. 2 for a V-domain. The folding is characterized
`by two pleated sheets connected by an internal di(cid:173)
`sulphide bridge linking strands 13 and C. The Lwo
`sheets cover a large number of hydrophobic amino
`acid side chains.
`Despite that gross similarity there exist substanlial
`differences when one compares V- and C- domains:
`C-domains lack strand X, strand D is very short (2-3
`amino acids) and connected to strand E. In addition
`the length of the loop regions in C-domains is different
`from V-domains, thus changing the overall shape con(cid:173)
`siderably.
`VH and V L, on the other hand, show only minor
`differences when compared with each other (except in
`the hypervariable regions) as do CL, C H I and CH3.
`CH 2 represents yet a
`third
`type of domain,
`differentiated from the other C -domains mainly by the
`branched carbohydrate chain linked to it. It will be
`discussed in more detail below.
`
`Do main-do ma in inter actio n
`Two kinds of domain interactions occur in immuno(cid:173)
`globulins: lateral (or trans) interactions and longi(cid:173)
`tudinal (or cis) interactions.
`In lateral interactions immunoglobu lin domains
`other than CH2 strongly associate to form modules
`VL-VH, CL-CHI, CH3-CH3. In V modules VH
`may be replaced by VL lo form light chain V dimers
`as seen in the Bence-Jones protein fragments Rei or
`Au7- 9 • In Bence-Jones proteins, which are light chain
`dimers, one of the light chains simulates the Fab pans
`of the heavy chain, as described for Mcg1 ~.
`V modules associate in a differenL way than C
`modules do. In V modules MGCD faces (see Fig. 2) of
`the domains get into contact, in C modules the /\ BFE.
`faces are involved.
`/\ considerable loss of accessible surl'ace area 11 i~
`connected with contact formation of the immuno(cid:173)
`globulin domains. It amounts to 1760 A2, 1923 f..2 and
`21801\2 for VL-VH, CL-CH I modules of IgC KoJIW
`and
`the C I l3-CH3 module of an human Fe
`fragmem '·'·11 respectively. In VL- VH association both
`framework residues and amino acids from hyper(cid:173)
`variable segments <:u-e involved. I\ comparison of V(cid:173)
`domain amino acid sequences of different animal
`species shows that the contacting framework residues
`are highly conserved. /\lso the consume dom;iin
`residues participating in lateral conlact arc either
`invariant or replaced by homologous residues in
`
`different immunoglobulin chains. This low deg ree of
`sequence variability for the residues importan1 for
`lateral comacc formation provides an explanation for
`the fact that differenl L-chains c.;an associate with
`different f I-chains to give intact irnmunoglobulins.
`In addition to the extensive Van dcr Waals cornacts,
`there exist a few trans hydrogen bonds, in which
`ma inly pol<1r side c;h;iin groups are involved. There <1re
`1.wo s;ilt linkages in Kol CL-CH I contact: Glu 125
`light chain - Lys 214 heavy chain, G lu 126 light chain
`- .Lys 148 heavy chain, which have their analgon in
`CH3 - CT-13 pairing: Glu 356- Lys 439, Glu 357 - Lys
`370.
`CJ 12 is an exception, as it forms a single unit
`without lateral domain interactions (see Fig. 3)*.
`Instead it interacts with bound carbohydrate, which is
`attached to Asn 297. The CH2 residues that are
`involved in carbohydrate contact are, with a few
`exceptions, structurally in the same positions as the
`residues that form the CH3-CH 3 contact (face ABFE
`in Fig. 2). This demonstrates that the carbohydrate
`in CH2 provides a substitute f'or
`the C-C con(cid:173)
`tact and presumably helps to stabilize the CH2-
`domain. The branched carbohydrate forms a few
`hydrogen bonds with the CH2-domain, but the dom(cid:173)
`inant interactions are hydrophobic in nature. The
`carbohydrate covers a hydrophobic pat.ch of the
`protein made up of Phe 241, 243, Val 262, 264, Tyr
`296, Thr 260, Arg 301, which would otherwise be
`exposed to the solvent. The loss of accessible surface
`area of one C l-1 2 domain is 522 A2 , which is only about
`ha lf as much covered surface area as seen in
`CII3-CH3 contact ( 1080 A2). This observation could
`explain the apparent 'softness' of those pans of the
`CH2-domain, as seen in the crysta l structureu·1\
`which are most remote from the C H 3-CH2 interface.
`The functional relevance of ca rbohydra te in ami(cid:173)
`bodies is unclear. It might be involved in intracellular
`movements of the glycoproteins and in secretion lf•. 1•. It
`may well be that the origin of t he a ltered funct ional
`properties of carbohydrate-free antibody variants is
`structural destabilization.
`ln contrast to the extensive lateral interac.:tions,
`nonbondcd longitudinal interactions a long the hcav}
`chain or light chain are much weaker or do not exist al
`all. However,
`they arc interes1ing because con(cid:173)
`formational changes in antibodies affect those inter(cid:173)
`actions.
`Fig. 3, which represents the Fe parr ol' .a n lg(; I
`molecule shows the CH2-CH3 interaction. Wit h a
`loss in accessible surface area of 778 J..z this wntacl
`has rough ly one l hi rd of the size of C H3-CH3 cont11ct.
`The residues that participate in CI-12-CI-13 contact
`arc highly conserved in a ll lg classes, suggesting that
`this contact is likely LO be found in IgC a nd lg/\ 11nd as
`CH3-CH4 contact in lgE and IgM.
`•Most t'<:adcrs will need a sicrco viewer (commcrciallr available )
`10 see in three dimensions the s tructures shown in 1hc paired
`diagrams on pages J 62, 163 and t 66.
`
`2 of 7
`
`Celltrion, Inc., Exhibit 1082
`
`

`

`Fig . .3 Stereo drawing of a space
`fi ll ing model of human Fe-frag(cid:173)
`ment.
`Th~ molecule is bui lt from two
`identical polypeptide ch;i ins (chain I,
`chain 2), and identical carbohydrate
`g roups. Both halves arc related by
`approximate diads.
`
`Fig. 4 lgG l molecule Kol.
`The Fab parts and the hinge segrnen1 are
`well ordered in the Kol crystals, the Fe part
`is disordered and not visible.
`
`PLEASE N O TE
`
`We regret that for tech nical reasons it
`has not been possible to reproduce Figs
`3, 4, 6, 7 and 8 with che colou r codi ng
`that allows different parts of the molec(cid:173)
`ules to be distinguished.
`The
`rull-colou r
`diagrams, with
`explanatory legends, can be found in
`the personal monthly edition of /mm1111-
`ology Today dated June 1982.
`
`D segment
`
`fig. 5 Am ino acid comparison of residues 98-119 (Eu num(cid:173)
`bering) of M603, New, Kol and Eu heavy chains. The
`underlined residues were left out in Fig. 6c.
`
`End ofVH
`
`98
`Cys Ala Arg
`Cys Ala Arg
`Cys Ala Arg
`Cys Ala Gly
`
`M603:
`New
`Kol
`Eu
`
`Asn Tyr Tyr
`Asn Leu
`lie
`Asp Gly Gly
`Gly Tyr Gly
`
`Gly
`Ala
`His
`lie
`
`Ser
`Gly
`Gly
`Tyr
`
`Thr
`Cys
`lie
`Phe Cys Ser Ser Ala Ser Cys
`Ser
`
`Phe
`
`3 of 7
`
`Celltrion, Inc., Exhibit 1082
`
`

`

`Fig. 6 Antigen binding region of
`lgGI Kol.
`(a) The extended third hyper(cid:173)
`variable loop of the heavy chain
`folds
`into
`the putative antigen
`binding pocket.
`(b) C a backbone and sidcchains
`of Kol antigen binding pocket.
`(c) Artificial deletion of nine
`resid ues in
`the third hyper(cid:173)
`variable segmem of Kol, which
`makes it of equal length with lgG I
`Eu'", reveals a deep curved cleft.
`
`J segment
`
`110
`Try Tyr Phe Asp Val Try Gly
`Asp Val Try Gly
`Asp Tyr Try Gly
`Pro Glu Glu Tyr
`
`Ala Gly Thr Thr
`Gin Gly Ser Leu
`Gin Gly Thr Pro
`Asn Gly Gly
`Leu
`
`119
`Val Thr Val Ser Ser
`Val Thr Val Ser Ser
`Val Thr Val Ser Ser
`Val Thr Val Ser Ser
`
`Gly Pro
`
`4 of 7
`
`Celltrion, Inc., Exhibit 1082
`
`

`

`IM
`
`/rmm111ology Today, ~of. 3, No. fi, IY/i2
`
`The C H2-CH 3 orientation is found LO be somc::whaL
`variable and influe::nced by external forces. In the F<'
`fragment crystals t he 1 wo chemically identical chains
`a re in a different environment. As a conse::quencc
`the CH2-CH3 orientation varies by about 6°. In
`Fe-Protein A complex crystals
`this arrangement
`differs slightly from that of Fe crys1als 1s.
`More drastic changes are observed in VI-I-Cl 11 and
`VL-CL longitudinal contacts, when chemically
`different Fab fragments are compared. These
`differences in longitudinal arrangement are most con(cid:173)
`veniently described by an elbow a ngle, which is
`enclosed by the pseudo diads rela ting VL to VH and
`CH1 to CL respectively. The elbow a ngle may vary
`from more than 170° to 135° when we compare Kol
`Fab with M cPc Fab 12- 1>.i9.zo.
`In two cases the elbow angles of the same molecule
`in two different crystal lallices were compared aud
`fou nd to differ by 8° and 17° respectively 19.21 . Tn Fab
`New, with an elbow angle of approximately 137°,
`there exist a few longitudinal contacts between VL
`and C L and VI I and C l 11 22•21, whereas there are no
`non-bonded longitudinal contacts in intact Kol and
`Fab Kol (see Fig. 4), which are characterized by an
`open elbow angle. We interpret these observations to
`mean that in Fab Kol the V- C arrangement is flexible
`in soluLion. In the crys1al the molecule is stablized by
`packing interactions; these will be discussed from a
`different poinl or view later.
`
`The a n tigen-binding area
`Comparison or amino acid sequences of variable
`parts has demonstrated the hypcrvariability of some
`segments. These were considered to be involved in
`antigen bindingH. Indeed, crystal structure analyses
`of lg fragment-haptcn complexes show that haptens
`bind in a cleft or depression formed by the hyper(cid:173)
`variablc segments.
`The VL d imer of Rei7•9 may serve as an illustrative
`examplt:. The symmetrica lly arranged hyperva riablc
`regions form a deep slit-like pocket around the diad
`relating lhe two VL monomers. The walls of t he sliL
`are li ned by tyrpsincs 49, 91, 96, /\sn 34 and G in 89;
`the bottom of the pocket is formed by T yr 36 and G in
`89. A trinitrophcnyl group binds to the Rei fragment
`and fills the binding pocke1 completely.
`Another example of an IgG fragment haptcn
`complex is Fab Ne", which is known to bind among
`other ligands a hydroxy derivative of vitamin K, 2\ .
`The hypervariable segments of l'\cw form a ~hallow
`groove wit~ approxima1c dimensions of 16 x 7 A O:Jnd a
`depth or 6 I\.
`McPc 603, a mouse lg/\ (K) Fab fragme11t211 u inds
`phosphorylcholine. The site or hapten binding is ~·
`large wedge s hape~ cavity, with dimensions 15 x 20 A
`and a depth of' 12 A. Only five of the six hypcrvariablc
`regions contribuLe to the forma tion of the cavity: L(cid:173)
`chain hypervariable regions one and three, and all
`three H-chain hypervariable regions. The second
`hypervariablc region of L-chain is screened from 1hc
`
`caviLy by the first hypervariable loop or L-chain and
`the third hypervariable loop of H-ehain. The deeper
`cavity in McPc603, as compared to Fab New, is due to
`longer hypervariable loops. The firs l hypervariablc
`region of L-cha in and the thi rd hypervariable region of
`I I-chain is three residues and the second hypcr(cid:173)
`variable loop of the H-chain is two residues longer in
`Mcl'c603 than in r\ew.
`Phosphorylcholine occupies only a small part of the
`cavity and interacts via Van der Waals forces, electro(cid:173)
`static interaciions, and hydrogen bonds with the
`p ro1ein.
`In contrast LO the above examples lgG Kol shows no
`cleft or depression in 1hc antigen-binding region. In
`lgG Kol the heavy chain has a rather long third hyper(cid:173)
`variable loop, which contains six residues more than
`M603 and eight more residues t h;111 Fab New. The
`amino acid sequences of the third hypervariable
`regions of M60326, NcwH, Kol2' and Eu28 a rc com(cid:173)
`pared in Pig. 5. T he sequence alignmc111 and classifi(cid:173)
`cation in VH, I) and J segment26.i• is somewhat
`arbicrary, especially for the beginning ofthe.J segment
`as a nucleotide sequence has been determined only for
`M6Q326 . The additional residues in Kol with the
`nearly palindromic amino acid sequence -Gly-Phc(cid:173)
`Cys-Ser-Ser-Ala-Scr-Cys-Phc-Gly fold into the puta(cid:173)
`tive antigen binding site and fill it comp letely (sec r ig.
`6a,b). The two cystcins arr disulphide bridged and
`form the start and endpoints of a shon ;1ntiparallel ~­
`sheet, comprising residues -Cy~-Scr-Ser-Ala-Scr-Cys - .
`If in a model building experiment nine residues arc cut
`from the third hypcrvariablc region of the Kol heavy
`chain, thus making it of equal length with lgG I Eu2",
`a deep curved cleft appears (Fig. 6c), which easily
`could accommodate haptcn~. With respect to the anti(cid:173)
`gen binding area lgG Kol 1hus looks as if it carried its
`own haptcn in form of an extended third hype::r(cid:173)
`variablc loop. Another peculiarity of lgG Kol mighi be
`of interes1 in that context. In the Kol crystal lattice the
`hypcrvariablc parts of one molecule !Ouch the hinge
`and spa1ially ac\jacent segments of a symmetrically
`related molecule. This contact consists of three salt
`linkages (Arg 49 light chain-COOH light chain, Asp
`50 light chain-Arg 215 heavy chain, /\sp 53 heavy
`ch;1in-Lys 134 heavy chain). a few hydrogen bonds
`and extensive Van der \Vaals interactions. Thus, che
`lauice contact found in Kol crystals might give an
`instructive model for antibody- an1igen interaction, as
`antigens arc usually macromolecules which cover a
`much larger part of the antibody than haptcns do.
`
`T he h inge segm en t
`The hinge segment which cova lcndy links Pab and
`Fe parts, has a unique primnry and spatial structure.
`Its central region consists of two para llel disulphide(cid:173)
`li nked poly L-p rolinc helices wirh an a mino acid
`sequence -Cys-Pro-Pro-Cys-1l.I '. In the lgG I subclass
`represented by the Kol molecule the poly-proline
`double helix is short ( Fi~. 7). However, in lgG3 the
`hinge sequence is quadruplicated'" and model build-
`
`5 of 7
`
`Celltrion, Inc., Exhibit 1082
`
`

`

`Immunology Today, uol. 3, Nv. 6, 1982
`
`165
`
`ing suggests that the poly-prolinc segment of this
`molecule may be more than 100 A long.
`The poly-proline segment, a relatively rigid struc(cid:173)
`rurc, is Aanked on both sides by Acxible segments: The
`segment on the N-te rminal side is well defined in the
`crystal lattice or Kol due LO crystal packing inter(cid:173)
`actions, but it lacks interna l interactions, that would
`provide stability in solution. The C terminal segment
`is di~ordcrcd and Acxiblc in Kol crystals and in 1 he Fe
`crystal structu rc1 1.1~. The rigid hinge segment allows
`independent movement of the Fab arms and the Fe
`part. There is direct evidence for flexibility in the
`crystal lattice of Kol''-19 and Zie3 ' . This is in contrast
`to the abnormal lgG protein Dob, which lacks a hinge
`rcgion32• The significance of the hinge for Fab-Fc
`flexib ility is obvious.
`
`Complement binding
`The binding of the Clq component of the Cl
`complex to antigcn-ancibody complexes is t he first
`step
`in
`the classical pathway of complement
`ac tivation 13·3 '· The Clq head pieces bind to the CH2
`domains of antibodies3·1•3". Protein /I., a constituent of
`the cell wait of Staphylococcus aureus, binds LO t he Fc(cid:173)
`part of antibody molecules of certain classes and sub(cid:173)
`classes, but does not
`interfere with complement
`binding. The determination of the crystal st ructure of
`the complex between FB (one of the four Fe-binding
`domains of protein AH) and Fe-fragment showed that
`protein A b inds al the Cl 12-CH3 contact•S.Js. Fig. 8
`shows a space-filling model of the FB-Fc complex.
`T he area of CH2 not covered by FB must contain the
`Clq binding site. In view of 1hc size of the Clq he<1d
`pieces (mo!. wt 50,000) it appears unlikely that t hey
`can bind at the inner sides of C H2, i.e. nea r the carbo(cid:173)
`hydrate. T he most plausible binding site is therefore
`near the tip of CH2 on t he outer side of the domain. It
`is worth mentioning that this region is disordered in
`crystals of' the FB-Fc complex which indicates th<tt
`this part of the C H2 domain is flexible. Possibly,
`flexibility is required for antibody C lq interaction.
`
`Summary a nd perspectives
`Investigations of the three-dimensional architecture
`of ;mtibodies h11ve elucidated the folding of the
`polypept ide chains into domains, and the spatial
`arrangement of the domains. The structural basis for
`understanding antibody specificity and antibody
`Aexibility was obtained. Segmental flexibi lity is a n
`important property of amibodics: Flexible segments of
`the polypeptide chains at the switch and hinge regions
`allow the !"ab fragments to change their shape and
`their relative orientation. Conformationill changes of
`this kind are necessary to meet the geometric require(cid:173)
`ments which arise on binding of antibodies to multi(cid:173)
`va lent antigens.
`The undersrnnding of the effector functions of anti(cid:173)
`body molecules is much less complete. One of the
`central problems is the explan:-ition of the strong
`e nh:-incement of C lq binding to antige n-a ntibody
`
`complexes as compared to free antibody molecules.
`Two mechanisms have been considered (for a review
`see Ref. 39): since Clq is multimeric with at least six
`antibody binding sites, binding may be enhanced by
`the form<1tion of a ntigen-antibody aggregates through
`crosslinking. Alternatively, antigen binding might
`induce a conformational change in the Fe-part which
`enhances affi nity for Clq.
`There is strong evidence for the importance or
`aggregation, but a mixed mechanism which involves
`aggregation and a conformational change cannot be
`ruled out.
`The studies described here were almost exclusively
`carried out with myeloma or Hence-Jones proteins
`because these were 1he only homogeneous irnmuno(cid:173)
`globulins which could be obtained in sufficient
`qua nt ity. However, in most cases the specificities of
`such molecules is unknown. Recently, large amounts
`or homogeneous antibodies elicited against strepto(cid:173)
`coccal or pneumococcal polysaccharides became
`available from cen a in rabbit and mouse stra ins"'·"'.
`These sources, and the use of hybrids obtained from
`myeloma and spleen cells have made it possible to
`obtain homogeneous antibodies of defined speci(cid:173)
`fic ity·•?.•~. Structural studies of 'natural' antigen-anti(cid:173)
`body complexes can be expected to lead to a more
`complete understanding of antibody function .
`Crystallographic work on a specific antibody and of its
`antigen is already in p rogress44 •
`
`Acknowledgements
`We thank Prof. R. Huber for helpful discussions.
`
`Refer ences
`I Edelman, G. M . ( 1970) Sti. :Im. /\ugusL, 8 t-S7
`2 Porter, R. R . ( 1976) Sri. Am. Oc1obcr, 8 1- 87
`3 Hi lschmann, N. (1%9).V11111rwi.r.1msdlflflm56, 19S-205
`4 F.dmundson, /\. B., Ely, K. R. and Ahola, E. £. ( 1978) 01111.
`To/1 . .lfnl. b1111111111Jf. 7, 95- 118
`5 1\m7.el , L. M . and Polj ak. R. J. ( 1?79) Ann. Rn·. l/i1Jr/1m1. 48,
`96 1- 997
`6 Porter. R. R. (1958)..V11l1ur( / ,md1m) 182, 670-67 1
`7 Epp, O .. Colman. P. M ., Fchlh<1mmcr, H ., Bode, W., Schiffer,
`:--~ .. Huber, R. and P<ilm. W. ( 1974) J\11r. ]. /Jinrhm1. 45,
`513- 524
`8 Fehlhammer, t I. , Schiffer, M., Epp, 0., Colman. P. M ..
`l.auman, E. E., Schwager, I'., Stcigcmann, W. and Schramm,
`1 l..J. ( 1975) /Jin/1/i)'·'· Strn/'/ . .lfrd11111i.wu I, 139-146
`9 Epp, 0., Laurnan, I~. E., Sch iffer, M ., Huber, R. and Palm.
`W. ( 1975) 8i1Jdmnistn• 14, 4943-4?52
`10 Edmundson, /\. B., Ely, K. R., /\bola, R. R., Schiffe r, M. and
`Paniagia1npou los. N. (t975 ) llinc"hmn<I')' 14, 3953-J961
`11 Lee, B. mid Ri<:hards, F. M . ( 1970)]. .\In/. Jim/. 55, 379-400
`t2 Colman, I'. M .. Deisenhofcr, .J .. Huber, R . and Pa lm. W .
`(1976)] . . lfo/. /lfo/. 100. 257-282
`13 Marquart, M ., Deiscnhofcr, J., Huber, R. and P~lm. W.
`(I 980)]. ,\/11/. /Jin/. 14 1. 369-392
`14 Dciscnhofcr,.J., Colman, P. M ., F.pp, 0 . and Huber-, R. (1976)
`H11f'lir-.\r.rifr\ ,(. l'h1•.<i11f. 01r111. 357, 1421- 1434
`I 5 Dei~cn hofcr,J. ( 198 1) Hi1H-lll'1ui.<lr.v 20, 236 1-2370
`16 !'l'lclchers, F. ( 1? 73) lli11rhr11111/TJ' 12, 1471-t47(1
`17 Weitzman, S. and Scharf1, ~I. D. ( 1976)]. .lfol. /Jwl. 102 ,
`237- 252
`II! Hickman,!:>., Kukzycki, /\ . .Jr, 1.ynch, R. G . and Kornfeld, S .
`c 1977)]. 11;"'· u,,111. 2s2. 4402-4408
`
`6 of 7
`
`Celltrion, Inc., Exhibit 1082
`
`

`

`Fig . 7 Confor ma tion of the hinge
`regio n as seen in IgC I Kol.
`
`Fig. 8 Space filling model of
`th e FS ( pro te in A ) - F e
`co m plex.
`
`19 Matsushima, M., Marquart, M., J ones, T. A., Colman, P. M .,
`Bartels, K., Huber, R. nnrl Palm, W. (1978) J. Mn/. BitJI. 121,
`44 1-459
`20 Segal, I). M., Padlan, E. /\., Cohen, G. H., RudikoIT. S.,
`Potter, M. a nd Davies, D. R. ( 1974) Pmc. Nall Acarl. Sci. U.S.A.
`71,4298-4302
`21 /\bola, E. E., l::ly, K. R. a nd Edmundson, A. B. ( 1980)
`B1'telmmslry 19, 432-439
`22 Poljak, R. J., Anncl. L. M., Chen, B. (,., Phiackerley. R. P.
`and Saul, F. (1974) !'me. Nntl Acnd. Sci. U.S.A. 71, 3440-3444
`23 Sau l, F., Arnzcl, l, . M. and Poljak, R. J. ( 1978)]. I/in/. Clum.
`253, 585- 597
`24 Wu, T. T. and Kabat, E. /\. ( 1970)]. /lrp. Mttl 132, 21 1-250
`25 /\mzel, L. M ., Poljak, R. j.. Saul, F .. Varga, J. M . and
`Richards. F. F. ( I 974) Proc. Nall Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 71,
`1427-1430
`26 Eady, P., Hua ng, H., Oavis, M., Calame, K. a nd Hood, L.
`(1980) Cell 19, 98 1-992
`27 Schmidt, W., Jung, H. D., Palm, W. and Hi lschmann, N.
`(1981) p rivate communication
`28 Cunningham, B. /\., Rutishauser, U., Ga ll, W. E., Cottlicb,P.
`D., Waxdal, M. J. and Edelman, G. M. ( 1970) /Jiochenustry '>,
`3161-3170
`29 Sakano, H., Maki, R., Kurosawa, Y., Roeder, W. and
`Toncgawa, S. (1980) N11ture ( l,ondo11) 286, 676-683
`30 Michaelson, T . E., Frangione, B. and Franklin, E. C. (1977)
`] . Ri11l. (.'hm1. 252, 883- 889
`
`3 I Ely, K. R., Colman, P. M., A bola, E. E., Hess, 1\. C., l'cabody,
`D. S., Parr, D. M ., Connell, G. E., Lauschinger, C. /\. and
`Edmundson , A . B. ( I 978) 8i.11chm1iflry 17. 820-823
`32 Si lverton, E: W ., Navia, M.A. and Davies, D.R. (1977) Pwr.
`Nall Arorl. Sci. U.S.A. 74, 5140-5 I 44
`33 Mueller-Eberhard, H. J. ( 1975) 111111. Rev. Bfocllrm. 44, 697- 724
`34 .Porter, R. R. and Reid, K. 13. M. ( 1979) Adv. Pmt. Cltem. 33,
`1- 71
`35 Connell, C. E. a nd Porter, R. R (197 I) llwchm1. ]. 124, 53P
`36 Yasmeen, D., Ellerson, J. R., Dorrington, I<. J. and Paimer,R.
`H. (1976}]. lmmtmt1/. 116, 518- 526
`37 Sjocdahl, J. (1977) far.J. lJiochem. 78, 47 1-490
`38 Oeisenhofcr, J., Jones, T. /\., Huber, R., Sjoedahl, .J. and Sjoe·
`quist,J. (1978) z. !'hysio/. (:hem. 359, 975-985
`39 Metzger, J-1. (1978) Ctmt. Top. Mo/. lmrmmol. 7, 119-148
`40 Jaton, J.-C., Huser, H., Braun, D. C., C i vol, D., P~dll,J. ;u1d
`Schlessingcr,J. C. (1975) Bif)(/tr.mi.1try 14, 53 12- 5315
`41 Braun, D. G. a nd Huser, H. ( 1977) in f>mgress in lmmwwfflgy If/
`(Mandel,'!'. E., Cheers, C. H., Hosking, C. S .. McKenzie,[. F.
`C. and Nossa!, G. J. V., eds) pp. 255-264, l::lsevie r North·
`Holland, Amsterdam, New York, Oxford
`42 Kuchler, G. and M ils1cin, C. (1975) Na11m ( l.1mdrm) 256,
`495-497
`43 Melchers, F., Potter, B. M. and Bethesda, N. W. (eds) (1978)
`C11rr. Top. Microbfol. lmmwlfll. 8 1
`44 Colman, P. M ., Gough, K. H., Lilley, G. G., Ulagrove, R . .J.,
`Webster, R. C. and Laver, W. G. (198 1) J. Mo/. Bini. 152,
`609--014
`
`7 of 7
`
`Celltrion, Inc., Exhibit 1082
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket